DOCSLIB.ORG

Subterranean Habitats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subterranean Habitats Faculty of the Environment Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem Subterranean Habitats M. Holec, R. Pokorný Ústí nad Labem, 2012 Faculty of the Environment Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem Subterranean Habitats Název: Subterranean Habitats Autoři: Mgr. Michal Holec, Ph.D. Ing. Richard Pokorný, DiS. Vědecký redaktor: Prof. Ing. Jaroslav Boháč, CSc. Recenzenti: RNDr. Miloslav Zacharda, CSc, RNDr. Karel Tajovský, CSc. © Fakulta životního prostředí Univerzita J. E. Purkyně 2012 ISBN: 978-80-7414-416-5 (brož.) ISBN: 978-80-7414-897-2 (online: pdf) Tato publikace vznikla v rámci projektu OPVK EnviMod - Modernizace výuky technických a přírodovědných oborů na UJEP se zaměřením na problematiku ochrany životního prostředí. Reg. č.: CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0205 Obsah Acknowledgements . 5 Introduction . 6 Emergence of Selected Underground Spaces . 7 Pseudokarst Caves . 10 Definition of Types of Natural Underground Spaces . 12 Cave ....................................................................12 Cavelet ..................................................................13 Chasm...................................................................13 Rock overhang ............................................................13 Superficial subterranean habitats ..............................................14 Stony accumulations........................................................15 Most Important Cave Regions in the Czech Republic . 16 Bohemian Karst ...........................................................16 Moravian Karst............................................................17 Branná Belt Karst ..........................................................18 Hranice Karst .............................................................18 Javoříčko Karst............................................................19 Mladeč Karst .............................................................19 Pálava Hills Karst..........................................................20 Chýnov Karst .............................................................20 Karst of the Kamenice and Železný Brod catchment basin ..........................21 Železné hory Karst ........................................................21 Tišnov Karst ..............................................................21 Main pseudokarst areas in the Czech Republic ...................................21 Subterranean habitats from the viewpoint of protection and administration . 23 Cave utilization............................................................23 Cave management and care ..................................................23 Cave research and evidence . 25 Environmental Conditions and Their Measuring . 26 Subterranean Microclimates..................................................26 Light ....................................................................28 Heat (temperature) .........................................................30 Humidity.................................................................35 Organic matter in subterranean habitats .........................................38 Atmosphere in subterranean habitats . .41 Methods of animals’ collection . 48 Direct searching for animals..................................................48 Pitfall trapping ............................................................49 Core sampling of soil, sediments or litter and fauna extraction.......................49 Ecological and Evolutionary Classifications . 51 The origin and emergence of subterranean terrestrial fauna . 55 Survey of selected groups of organisms . 57 Nematodes (Nematoda) .....................................................58 Annelids (Annelida) ........................................................59 Molluscs (Mollusca)........................................................59 Spiders and other related groups ..............................................60 Crustacea ................................................................62 Millipedes and centipedes ...................................................63 Hexapods (Hexapoda) ......................................................64 Bats (Chiroptera) ..........................................................67 Other vertebrates ..........................................................68 Future of underground research . 69 References . 70 Acknowledgements With regard to the fact that this material is mainly based on the book of POKORNÝ and HOLEC (2009), we would like to thank here all who already participated on the creation of the cited book. Here we would like to thank especially to RNDr. Vlado Papáč for providing photos of springtails. We also thank to language agency Skřivánek s.r.o. for the English translantion of the main parts of the text and to Ing. Lenka Zoubková for the final language improvement. We also thank to both opponents for their valuable comments on manuscript. We would also like to thank our workplace, which allows us to explore this issue, especially within teaching activities. We also thanks to a donation from the Ministry of Environment R&D (MŽP VaV) No. SP/2d3/4/07 for the purpose of research in the years 2007–2009, and later approved by University Development Fund (UDF, FRVŠ in Czech) project No. 305/2010/F4/a – grant of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS, MŠMT in Czech) and project of the Internal Foundation of UJEP – ”Paleontological research of the pseudokarst in north Bohemia”. Subterranean Habitats Introduction The authors have been paying considerable attention to the caves in the North Bohemian neovolca- nites for several years. The issue includes not only mapping caves in the field, but also the acquisition of other more detailed characteristics (part of data was published in POKORNÝ and HOLEC 2009). The colonization of caves by invertebrates was studied, althought data have not been still published. In the region, however, data on the occurrence of vertebrates, esp. bats, are available as well, e.g. BENDA and CHVÁTAL (2011). This was the background for the idea to create a compulsory school course, especially for foreign students of Jan Evangelista Purkyně University – Faculty of the Environment in Ústí nad Labem, which would call attention to the general scientific value of less known subterrannean environment. In this text we generalised our former unpublished text for students oriented mainly on regional lo- calities. The presented material brings the basic general information about the terrestrial caves and other natural terrestrial subterranean habitats. Water habitats, including interstitial habitats, were not mentioned because this text will serve as theoretical background for terrain excursion with students of Faculty of the Environment, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem. Our field trips with students will be oriented to the localities with terrestrial caves only and description of wa- ter habitats and water biota would stay without practical usage. For the same reason we prefer, for example, description of epigenetic pseudokarst. Description of other cave types, rarely surrounded our workplace or dangerous for excursions with students, was neglected. 6 Emergence of Selected Underground Spaces Emergence of Selected Underground Spaces Processes leading to the emergence of spaces below the surface of the earth can be divided into two basic groups – chemical and physical (= mechanical). By chemical processes we mean those which change the essence of the chemical substance of the primary rock. Generally these processes involve dissolution or oxidation. In the case of dissolution, the rock is dissolved by the action of a suitable sol- vent, such as water or a weak naturally occurring acid. This creates underground cavities of varying size and layout. As the dissolution equation generally works both ways, the reverse can happen, with dissolved substances accreting to create typical cave formations, known as speleothems. The most common chemical process leading to the creation of underground spaces is karstification, the result of which is karst, a characteristic type of landscape typified by the presence of surface and underground phenomena. The condition for this is the reaction of rainwater and other CO2-enriched surface waters with the rock (generally carbonate in composition – limestone, marble, dolomites) on the surface of the earth. Water travels down deep through fissures, where it dissolves the rock to form chimneys, passages and caves. In contrast to established opinion, karst phenomena do not only occur in limestone, but may be present in all rocks that have been at least partially dissolved. In the case of carbonates, the basic matter is dissolved according to the following schema (equations I, II) (PŘIBYL et al. 1992). + + 2– (I) CO2 + H2O ↔ H + (HCO3) – ↔ H + CO3 - 2+ 2- (II) (HCO3) + CaCO3 ↔ Ca + 2(HCO3) The work of CIGNA (1978) states that when describing the creation of the natural underground, we must base our arguments on the so-called three-component equilibrium: - CaCO3 (calcium carbonate, calcite) – the basic building block of calcareous rocks; in the broader sense any dissolved parent rock is considered to be a reaction component - water – a medium with mechanical and chemical action - - CO2 (carbon dioxide) – in the form of ions (HCO3) in a water solution acts as a kind of solvent CIGNA divides up the different types of formation depending on the number of components in- volved in the creation of the cave. 7 Subterranean Habitats Tab. I. Division of karst and non-karst
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) En El Oeste De Galicia
    Graellsia, 51: 83-92 (1995) ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO DE LA DISTRIBUCIÓN DE LA SUPERFAMILIA VITRINOIDEA FITZINGER, 1833 (GASTROPODA, PULMONATA) EN EL OESTE DE GALICIA P. Ondina (*), J. Hermida (*) y T. Rodríguez (*) RESUMEN En este trabajo se realiza un estudio faunístico de las especies de la Superfamilia Vitrinoidea Fitzinger, 1833, encontradas en el oeste de Galicia (provincias de A Coruña y Pontevedra). Para cada especie se incluyen citas previas y localidades de captura, así como sus respectivos mapas de distribución, en cuadrículas 10 x 10 Km U.T.M. Se cons- tata la presencia de Aegopinella pura (Alder, 1830) en el área de estudio y se cita por primera vez Oxychilus glaber (Rossmässler, 1835) en la provincia de Pontevedra Palabras Clave: Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Vitrinoidea, distribución, Galicia. ABSTRACT An actualitation to the knowledge of the distribution of the Superfamily Vitrinoidea Fitzinger, 1833 (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) in the west of Galicia A faunistic study of species of Superfamily Vitrinoidea Fitzinger, 1833, in the west of Galicia (A Coruña and Pontevedra provinces) has been realized. For each species the previous cite and the localities where the species have been found, are included, as well as a map showing the distribution of each species, using U.T.M. 10 x 10 Km system. We corroborate the presence of Aegopinella pura (Alder, 1830) in the study area and Oxychilus glaber (Rossmässler, 1835) is recorded for first time from Pontevedra pro- vince. Key words: Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Vitrinoidea, distribution, Galicia. Introducción cretas, como los realizados en la meseta y costa lucense por Altimira (1969), en las dunas de la ría Los primeros datos sobre la malacofauna de Vigo por Sacchi (1979) y Sacchi & Violani terrestre en Galicia datan del siglo pasado, con los (1977), en O Courel por Outeiro (1988) o en dos estudios llevados a cabo por Graells (1846), localidades de la provincia de A Coruña por Seoane (1866), Macho Velado (1871, 1878) e Riballo (1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna from Leaota Mountains - Romania
    Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. Tom. 33, No. 1/2017 ISSN 1454-6914 DIVERSITY OF SOIL MITES (ACARI: MESOSTIGMATA) AND GASTROPODS (GASTROPODA) FAUNA FROM LEAOTA MOUNTAINS - ROMANIA MANU Minodora, LOTREAN Nicolae, CIOBOIU Olivia, POP Oliviu Grigore Abstract. In the period May-September 2016, the diversity of soil mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) and fauna of gastropods (Gastropoda) was investigated in Leaota Mountains. In total 44 transects were investigated, located in 13 types of habitats. Considering the mite fauna, 52 species were identified. The highest value of Shannon index was recorded in natural beech forest, in comparison with the planted spruce forest, where this parameter recorded the lowest value. From the conservative point of view, Pergamasus laetus Juvara-Bals, 1970 was identified as an endemic species for Romania. Another two rare species were signaled: Veigaia propinqua Willmann, 1936 and V. transisalae (Oudemans, 1902). Iphidosoma multiclavatum Willmann, 1953 was signaled for the first time in Romania. Taking into account the gastropod fauna (Gastropoda), 26 species were investigated. The most favorable habitats for these invertebrates were deciduous and spruce forest. One endemic species for Romania was identified: Mastus venerabilis (L. Pfeiffer, 1855). Keywords: abundance, diversity, gastropods, habitat, mites. Rezumat. Diversitatea faunei de acarieni edafici (Acari: Mesostigmata) și de gastropode (Gastropoda) din Munţii Leaota - România. În perioada mai - septembrie 2016, s-a realizat studiul diversităţii faunei de acarieni edafici (Acari: Mesostigmata) şi a gastropodelor (Gastropoda) din munţii Leaota. Au fost investigate 44 de transecte, localizate în 13 tipuri de habitate. Analizând fauna de acarieni, au fost identificate 52 de specii. Cea mai mare valoare a indicelui de diversitate Shannon s-a obţinut în pădurea naturală de fag, în comparaţie cu plantaţia de molid, unde acest parametru a scăzut semnificativ.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Malakológiai Tájékoztató 11. (Eger, 1992.)
    M ALAKOLÓGI AI TÁJÉKOZTATÓ 11. MALACOLOGICAL NEWSLETTER • Kiadja a MÁTRA MÚZEUM TERMÉSZETTUDOMÁNYI OSZTÁLYA Published by THE NATURAL SCIENCE SECTION OF MÁTRA MUSEUM Szerkesztő (Editor) Dr. FÜKÖH LEVENTE HU - ISSN 0230-0648 Distribution of Molluscs of the Molluscan Clay of Two Localities According to Habitats and Feeding Habits (Wind Brickyard, Eger and Nyárjas Hill. Novaj; Hungary) A. Dávid Abstract: Among the Egerian Age exposures of North-east Hungary the Molluscan Clay of Wind Brickyard (Eger) and Nyárjas Hill (Novaj) contain fossils in exceptional richness. Distribution of molluscs of the Molluscan Clay of these two outcrops according to habitats and feeding habits is examined and compared. There are definite differences between the two localities. Introduction Among the several Upper-Oligocene outrops of North-Hungary the Molluscan Clay layers «f _Wind Brickyard, Eger and Nyárjas Hill, Novaj is compared (Fig.l.). These layers contain well-preserved „micro-mollusc" fossils abudantly. The bivalves, gastropods and schaphopods which were living here during the Egerian stage have belonged into the Hinia — Cadulus fossil community. It refers to similar paleoenvironments in case of both localities. The sea was deeper than 120 metres and the bottom was covered by fine-gra­ ined, clayey sediments. The aim of the investigation was to examine the distribution of the molluscs according to habitats and feeding habits in the collected materials. Methods Fifteen kilograms of clay was taken from both localities. After drying the samples were treated with hot water and peroxide of hydrogen. This material was washed out through a 0,5 nun sieve. At the end the molluscan remains were assorted from among the other fossils (e.gJ^oraminifera, Decapoda, Echinoidea, Osteichthyes).
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) by Thomas C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref TRECHOBLEMUS IN NORTH AMERICA, WITH A KEY TO NORTH AMERICAN GENERA OF TREX2HINAE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) BY THOMAS C. BARR, JR. The University of Kentucky, Lexington Trechoblemus Ganglbauer is a genus of trechine beetles (Tre- chinae: Trechini: Trechina) previously known only from Europe and Asia. It formed the type genus of Jeannel's "S6rie phyl6tique de Trechoblemus". and is generally regarded as closely related to cavernicolous trechines in Japan, the Carpathians and Transylvanian Alps of eastern Europe, and eastern United States (Barr, I969; Jeannel, I928, I962; U6no and Yoshida, I966). The large cave beetle genus Pseudanophthalmus Jeannel, with approximately 75 species in caves of ten eastern States, the monobasic genus Nea- phaenops Jeannel, from Kentucky caves, and the dibasic genus ]gelsonites Valentine, ]rorn Tennessee and Kentucky, are part of the Trechoblemus complex. The apparent restriction of Trechoblemus to Eurasia led previous investigators to conclude that, with respect to the richly diverse trechine fauna in caves of eastern United States, "there are no im- mediate, ancestral genera now present in North America" (Barr, 969, p. 83). Although there is at least one edaphobitic (obligate in soil) species of American Pseudanophthalmus known (P. sylvaticus Barr, I967), in the mountains of West Virginia, it has already lost eyes, wings, and pigment, and merely indicates that many of the "regressive" evolutionary changes in ancestral Pseudanohthal- mus may have taken place in the soil or deep humus before the beetles became restricted to caves. Most of the species of Pseuda- nophthalmus from eastern Europe (Barr, 964) are also eyeless edaphobites.
    [Show full text]
  • Karst Geology and Cave Fauna of Austria: a Concise Review
    International Journal of Speleology 39 (2) 71-90 Bologna (Italy) July 2010 Available online at www.ijs.speleo.it International Journal of Speleology Official Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Karst geology and cave fauna of Austria: a concise review Erhard Christian1 and Christoph Spötl2 Abstract: Christian E. & Spötl C. 2010. Karst geology and cave fauna of Austria: a concise review. International Journal of Speleology, 39 (2), 71-90. Bologna (Italy). ISSN 0392-6672. The state of cave research in Austria is outlined from the geological and zoological perspective. Geologic sections include the setting of karst regions, tectonic and palaeoclimatic control on karst, modern cave environments, and karst hydrology. A chapter on the development of Austrian biospeleology in the 20th century is followed by a survey of terrestrial underground habitats, biogeographic remarks, and an annotated selection of subterranean invertebrates. Keywords: karst, caves, geospeleology, biospeleology, Austria Received 8 January 2010; Revised 8 April 2010; Accepted 10 May 2010 INTRODUCTION be it temporarily in a certain phase of the animal’s Austria has a long tradition of karst-related research life cycle (subtroglophiles), permanently in certain going back to the 19th century, when the present- populations (eutroglophiles), or permanently across day country was part of the much larger Austro- the entire species (troglobionts). An easy task as Hungarian Empire. Franz Kraus was among the first long as terrestrial metazoans are considered, this worldwide to summarise the existing knowledge in undertaking proves intricate with aquatic organisms. a textbook, Höhlenkunde (Kraus, 1894; reprinted We do not know of any Austrian air-breathing species 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Desktop Biodiversity Report
    Desktop Biodiversity Report Land at Balcombe Parish ESD/14/747 Prepared for Katherine Daniel (Balcombe Parish Council) 13th February 2014 This report is not to be passed on to third parties without prior permission of the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre. Please be aware that printing maps from this report requires an appropriate OS licence. Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre report regarding land at Balcombe Parish 13/02/2014 Prepared for Katherine Daniel Balcombe Parish Council ESD/14/74 The following information is included in this report: Maps Sussex Protected Species Register Sussex Bat Inventory Sussex Bird Inventory UK BAP Species Inventory Sussex Rare Species Inventory Sussex Invasive Alien Species Full Species List Environmental Survey Directory SNCI M12 - Sedgy & Scott's Gills; M22 - Balcombe Lake & associated woodlands; M35 - Balcombe Marsh; M39 - Balcombe Estate Rocks; M40 - Ardingly Reservior & Loder Valley Nature Reserve; M42 - Rowhill & Station Pastures. SSSI Worth Forest. Other Designations/Ownership Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Environmental Stewardship Agreement; Local Nature Reserve; National Trust Property. Habitats Ancient tree; Ancient woodland; Ghyll woodland; Lowland calcareous grassland; Lowland fen; Lowland heathland; Traditional orchard. Important information regarding this report It must not be assumed that this report contains the definitive species information for the site concerned. The species data held by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) is collated from the biological recording community in Sussex. However, there are many areas of Sussex where the records held are limited, either spatially or taxonomically. A desktop biodiversity report from SxBRC will give the user a clear indication of what biological recording has taken place within the area of their enquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O19749
    Oikos o19749 Gerisch, M., Agostinelli, V., Henle, K. and Dziock, F. 2011. More species, but all do the same: contrasting effects of flood disturbance on ground beetle functional and species diversity. – Oikos 121: 508–515. Appendix A1 Tabelle1 Table A1. Full species list representing the standardized number of individuals per species for the study sites Steckby, Woerlitz, and Sandau. Density expresses the proportion of species standardized abundances to total abundance. Macropterous = winged, brachypterous = wingless, dimorphic = both forms can appear with a species. Body size is the average of maximum and minimum values found in the literature (for references see below). Wing Reproduction Body size Species names Steckby Woerlitz Sandau Density Morphology Season In mm Acupalpus dubius 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 2.6 Acupalpus exiguus 1.838 1.019 0.71 0.005 macropterous spring 2.7 Acupalpus parvulus 0.081 0.038 0.032 0 macropterous spring 3.6 Agonum dolens 0.032 0.038 0.081 0 dimorph spring 8.8 Agonum duftschmidi 14.966 2.755 0.016 0.025 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum emarginatum 116.659 4.472 25.194 0.208 macropterous spring 7.2 Agonum fuliginosum 0.097 0.038 0 0 dimorph spring 6.7 Agonum lugens 0.177 0 0.081 0 macropterous spring 9 Agonum marginatum 0.371 0.075 0.113 0.001 macropterous spring 9.2 Agonum micans 19.502 4.208 23.71 0.067 macropterous spring 6.6 Agonum muelleri 0 0.019 0 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum piceum 0.468 0 0.016 0.001 macropterous spring 6.4 Agonum sexpunctatum 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W
    Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W. Welter-Schultes Version 1.1 March 2013 Suggested citation: Welter-Schultes, F.W. (2012). Guidelines for the capture and management of digital zoological names information. Version 1.1 released on March 2013. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 126 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-44-5, accessible online at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. ISBN: 87-92020-44-5 (10 digits), 978-87-92020-44-4 (13 digits). Persistent URI: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. Language: English. Copyright © F. W. Welter-Schultes & Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 2012. Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and opinions presented in this publication are those of the author and do not represent those of GBIF. License: This document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Document Control: Version Description Date of release Author(s) 0.1 First complete draft. January 2012 F. W. Welter- Schultes 0.2 Document re-structured to improve February 2012 F. W. Welter- usability. Available for public Schultes & A. review. González-Talaván 1.0 First public version of the June 2012 F. W. Welter- document. Schultes 1.1 Minor editions March 2013 F. W. Welter- Schultes Cover Credit: GBIF Secretariat, 2012. Image by Levi Szekeres (Romania), obtained by stock.xchng (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1389360). March 2013 ii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 Table of Contents How to use this book ......................................................................... 1 SECTION I 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Identifiers and the role of Linnean names ......................................... 2 1.1.1 Identifiers ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Landscape on the Diversity in Urban Green Areas
    DOI: 10.1515/eces-2017-0040 ECOL CHEM ENG S. 2017;24(4):613-625 Marina KIRICHENKO-BABKO 1*, Grzegorz ŁAGÓD 2, Dariusz MAJEREK 3 Małgorzata FRANUS 4 and Roman BABKO 1 THE EFFECT OF LANDSCAPE ON THE DIVERSITY IN URBAN GREEN AREAS ODDZIAŁYWANIE KRAJOBRAZU NA RÓ ŻNORODNO ŚĆ W OBSZARACH ZIELENI MIEJSKIEJ Abstract: This article presented the results of a comparative analysis of carabid species compositions (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in urban green areas of the City of Lublin, Eastern Poland. In this study, the occurrence and abundance of ground beetles were analysed according to habitat preference and dispersal ability. A total of 65 carabid species were found in the three green areas. Obviously, the high species richness of ground beetles in the greenery of the Lublin is determined by the mostly undeveloped floodplain of the river Bystrzyca. The species richness of carabids and their relative abundance decrease in the assemblage of green areas under the effect of isolation of green patches and fragmentation of the semi-natural landscape elements in the urban environment. Generalists and open-habitat species significantly prevailed in all green areas. The prevailing of riparian and forest species at floodplain sites of the river Bystrzyca demonstrated the existence of a connection of the carabid assemblage with landscape of river valley. The Saski Park and gully “Rury” are more influenced by urbanization (fragmentation, isolation of green patches) and recreation that is consistent with the significant prevalence of open-habitats species in the carabid beetle assemblage. Keywords: green areas, Carabidae, species diversity, urban ecology, Poland Introduction The growth of populated areas and the transformation of landscapes have been important factors from the second half of the 20 th century to the present.
    [Show full text]