DOCSLIB.ORG

Heteroptera: Miridae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by American Museum of Natural History Scientific Publications PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3558, 17 pp., 9 figures March 8, 2007 A New Genus and New Species of Austro-Papuan Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae) MICHAEL A. WALL1 ABSTRACT Sagittacopula, new genus, is described to accommodate S. rufescens, new species, from Cape York Peninsula, and S. carvalhoi, new species, from eastern New Guinea. Morobea Carvalho and its type species, Morobea longipes Carvalho, are redescribed, and M. spectabilis, new species, from eastern New Guinea is described. Wumea Carvalho and its type species, Wumea cylpealis Carvalho, are redescribed, and W. cassisi, new species, from eastern New Guinea is described. INTRODUCTION anterior margin of the pronotum, a broadly emarginate posterior margin of the pronotum, Many species of Orthotylinae of New and relatively long metathoracic legs. In the Guinea and the surrounding region share present paper, I redescribe two genera and a shining glassy body, an anteroventrally species originally described by Carvalho projecting head, with a distinctly carinate (1987) and describe one new genus and four posterior margin, a flat pronotal collar, and new species that fall within this subset of the gracile appendages. This morphology is epit- Candidomiris-group. omized by Morobea Carvalho (1987), All measurements are in millimeters. Candidomiris Kerzhner and Schuh (1995), Abbreviations for measurements are as fol- Wumea Carvalho (1987), Dimifacoris lows: L-Tot 5 total length, Cly-Cun 5 length Carvalho (1987), and a suite of undescribed from clypeus to cuneal fracture, L-Hd 5 taxa, which I collectively refer to as the length of head, L-Prn 5 length of pronotum, Candidomiris-group. Within the Candidomiris- L-Sct 5 length of scutellum, L-Cun 5 length group are several species that are diagnosed by of cuneus, W-Hd 5 width of head, W-Prn 5 an elongate parallel-sided body, a projecting width of pronotum, W-Sct 5 width of clypeus, a strongly carinate posterior margin scutellum, IOD 5 interocular distance, L-AI of the head capsule that projects over the 5 length of antennal segment I, L-AII 5 1Department of Entomology, San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, CA 92112. ([email protected]). Copyright E American Museum of Natural History 2007 ISSN 0003-0082 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3558 length of antennal segment II, L-AIII 5 in front of frons; gena and maxillary plates length of antennal segment III, L-AIV 5 extending anteroventrally; buccal cavity ob- length of antennal segment IV, L-mtf 5 length ovate, short; eyes occupying about one-half of metafemora, and L-mtt 5 length of of total head height in lateral view, postero- metatibiae. lateral margin slightly separated from margin of pronotum; antennae inserted midway Morobea Carvalho between ventral and dorsal margins of eye. Antennae elongate, gracile; segment I sub- Morobea Carvalho, 1987: 181. equal to length of pronotum, vasiform; segment II cylindrical, elongate with species TYPE SPECIES: Morobea longipes Carvalho, specific arrangement of short setae at base 1987 (original designation). (fig. 3), three times longer than segment I; DIAGNOSIS: Recognized among other segment III and IV gracile, often coiled in dry Orthotylini by the following combination of specimens. Labium reaching just beyond characters: elongate parallel-sided body posterior margin of metacoxae. Pronotum (fig. 1a, b, d); projecting clypeus (fig. 2c); elongate trapeziform, slightly longer than strongly carinate posterior margin of head broad, coarsely punctate posteriorly; pronotal projecting over anterior margin of pronotum collar thin, slightly overlapped dorsally by (fig. 2a, c); disc of pronotum coarsely rugulose weakly carinate margin of disc; lateral mar- (fig. 2a); posterior margin of pronotum broad- gins slightly emarginate; posterior margin ly emarginate; metathoracic legs relatively distinctly sinuate with medial emargination; long. Males with second antennal segment disc weakly convex, vaguely separated into with species specific arrangement of short anterior and posterior lobes by shallow setae at base (fig. 3); genital capsule enormous sulcus; calli weakly raised, undifferentiated. (fig. 4a, 5a), subequal to one-half abdominal Mesoscutum weakly exposed. Scutellum tri- length; opening of genital capsule dispropor- angular, slightly convex. Hemelytra elongate, tionately large, clearly exposing complex parallel-sided to posterior margin of cuneus; aedeagus; aedeagus with remarkably convo- cuneus two to three times longer than broad. luted and heavily sclerotized phallotheca (figs. 4d, 5e); ductus seminis with thickened Metathoracic spiracle large with evaporative heavily sclerotized ring proximal to secondary areas (fig. 2e); ostiole lenticular, placed ante- gonopore. riorly on metepisternum; peritreme swollen anteriorly and posteriorly (fig. 2f); evapora- REDESCRIPTION: Male: General Aspect: Macropterous, elongate, parallel-sided, total tive area extending to posterior margin of length 5.88–6.57; length from apex to clypeus metepisternum, deflexed posteriorly. Legs to cuneal fracture 4.42–4.75; width across extremely elongate; claws moderately curved humeral angles of pronotum 0.83–0.96. with apically convergent parempodia Coloration and Vestiture (figs. 1a, d): Body (fig. 2d). Genitalia (figs. 4–5): Genital capsule yellowish brown with red and green macula- large; genital opening disproportionately tions; antennae and legs yellowish brown with large; ventral margin of aperture with dorsal red maculation on apices of metafemora; and ventral projections. Left paramere elon- membrane of forewing moderately suffused gate, bent near base with a sinuous apical with brown; veins red to undifferentiated. process. Right paramere relatively short, Dorsum with sparse fine, short, hyaline setae; robust, bent at midlength. Phallotheca com- mesepisternum and metepisternum with field plex, highly dissected, projecting well outside of dense microchaetae; legs and antennae of genital capsule. Aedeagus relatively simple; with fine, distally orientated short, red, setae. ductus seminis with heavily sclerotized ring Structure: Head (fig. 2a–c) moderately pro- basal to secondary gonopore; secondary jecting in front of eyes; posterior margin gonopore weakly defined. convex; posterior margin strongly carinate, FEMALE: Ovipositor approximately one- projecting over anterior margin of pronotum; half length of abdomen; subgenital plate frons flat posteriorly becoming steeply decli- narrowly triangular with acute distal margin, vent anteriorly; clypeus distinctly projecting roughly one-third length of ovipositor. 2007 WALL: AUSTRO-PAPUAN ORTHOTYLINAE 3 Fig. 1. Dorsal habitus photographs. a. Morobea longipes (male). b. M. longipes (female). c. close-up of cuneus of M. longipes (female). d. M. spectabilis. e. Wumea cassisi. f. W. cylpealis. g. Sagittacopula carvalhoi. h. S. rufescens. Morobea longipes Carvalho dorsal margin of propleuron, most promi- figures 1a–c, 2, 3a, 4 nent anteriorly; genital capsule without lateral tubercle; aedeagus with relatively Morobea longipes Carvalho 1987: 181 (n.sp.). small, serrated, hatchetlike lobal sclerite DIAGNOSIS: Differentiated from similar (fig. 4d–e). Females with long medially taxa by characters listed in generic diagnosis oriented setae on posterior margin of corium and discontinuous red maculations along (fig. 1c). 4 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3558 Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of Morobea longipes. a. Head and pronotum, dorsal view. b. Head and pronotum, ventral view. c. Head and pronotum, lateral view. d. Pretarsus, ventral view. e. Meso- and metathorax, lateral view. f. Evaporative area (scale bars 5 50 mm). REDESCRIPTION: Coloration (fig. 1a): Head entiated ventrally. Scutellum yellowish brown, yellowish brown with vague red maculations sometimes suffused with blue-green. on clypeus and mandibular plates. Antennae Hemelytra predominately yellowish brown; yellowish brown becoming darker distally. margin of clavus weakly suffused with red Prothorax yellowish brown, tinged with green along scutellar margin; cuneus ringed with in some specimens; disc and collar undiffer- red. Abdomen yellow with dorsal surface of entiated; dorsal margin of propleuron with red male genital capsule dark brown. Legs pre- maculation at anterolateral margin, undiffer- dominately yellow, becoming brown distally, 2007 WALL: AUSTRO-PAPUAN ORTHOTYLINAE 5 Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of the base of second antennal segment in Morobea. a. M. longipes. b. M. spectabilis (scale bars 5 30 mm). ventral surface suffused with blue-green; minute, almost obsolete; medial portion of metafemur with pale brown spots on anterior membrane with large field of short velutinous surface and red distally. Structure:Asin hairs. Genitalia: Ovipositor as in generic generic description with the following addi- description. Internal genitalia unknown due tions. Head with weak sulcus along length of to damaged material. vertex and frons; antennal segment II weakly MEASUREMENTS: Males (N 5 2): L-Tot swollen as base, swollen portion with dense 5.88–6.11, Cly-Cun 4.42–4.44, L-Hd 0.59– field of short hairs oriented perpendicular to 0.62, L-Prn 0.83–0.93, L-Sct 0.59–0.62, L- antennal surface (fig. 3a). Cuneus 2.5 times Cun 0.92–1.03, W-Hd 0.57–0.79, W-Prn 1.18– longer than broad, subtriangular. Small cell of 1.21, W-Sct 0.57–0.61, IOD 0.35–0.37, L-AI hemelytral membrane less than one-third 0.86–1.01, L-AII 2.88–3.19, L-AIII 1.67–1.67, length of cuneus. Genitalia (fig. 4): Genital L-AIV 2.11, L-mtf 3.55, L-mtt 5.87. Females capsule broadly subconical with large aper- (N 5 2): L-Tot 6.06, Cly-Cun 4.73, L-Hd 0.62, ture; dorsal projection of ventral rim roughly L-Prn 0.83–0.90, L-Sct 0.55–0.65, L-Cun 1.05– symmetrical, slightly skewed to left, broadly 1.13, W-Hd 0.79, W-Prn 1.17–1.29, W-Sct rounded; ventral projection of ventral rim 0.61–0.64, IOD 0.41, L-AI 1.02, L-AII 3.18, L- asymmetrical skewed left, acute. Parameres as AIII 1.72, L-AIV 1.65, L-mtf 3.30, L-mtt 5.61.
Recommended publications
  • Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Wisconsin

    Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Wisconsin

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 37 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2004 Numbers Article 3 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2004 April 2004 Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wisconsin Andrew H. Williams University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Andrew H. 2004. "Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 37 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol37/iss1/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Williams: Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wiscon 16 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 37, Nos. 1 & 2 FEEDING RECORDS OF TRUE BUGS (HEMIPTERA: HETEROPTERA) FROM WISCONSIN Andrew H. Williams1 ABSTRACT Basic to our understanding of any animal and its habitat requirements is knowing what it eats. Reported here are observations of feeding by 49 species of true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) encountered in Wisconsin over 1992-2002. ____________________ Knowing what an animal eats is basic to our understanding of that ani- mal and its habitat requirements. From 1992 through 2002, I accumulated many observations of insects feeding in Wisconsin. Presented here are data from 49 species and subspecies in 11 families including Alydidae, Berytidae, Coreidae, Cydnidae, Lygaeidae, Miridae, Nabidae, Pentatomidae, Reduviidae, Rhopalidae and Scutelleridae.
  • Blister Beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae) of Wisconsin

    Blister Beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae) of Wisconsin

    BLISTER BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: MELOIDAE) OF WISCONSIN: DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY By Daniel A. Marschalek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Entomology) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2013 Date of final oral examination: 12/7/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Daniel K. Young, Professor, Entomology Daniel L. Mahr, Professor Emeritus, Entomology Claudio Gratton, Associate Professor, Entomology Eileen M. Cullen, Associate Professor, Entomology Don M. Waller, Professor, Botany Mark E. Berres, Assistant Professor, Animal Sciences i BLISTER BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: MELOIDAE) OF WISCONSIN: DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY Daniel A. Marschalek Under the supervision of Professor Daniel K. Young At the University of Wisconsin-Madison Meloids are commonly referred to as “blister beetles” due to the toxin (cantharidin) they possess which can cause blistering of human skin. Several meloid species have long histories of negatively impacting agriculture resulting from large foraging aggregations and negatively impacting livestock health. Even with these important and interesting aspects, little is known about these beetles in their natural habitats. There are recent faunistic surveys of selected insect taxa in Wisconsin but a formal investigation of Meloidae is lacking. The blister beetle fauna of several states has been published, but this survey represents the first in the Midwestern United States. This study provides a comprehensive list of all meloid species documented from Wisconsin, as well as taxonomic keys and summaries for each species (species pages) which includes taxonomy, description, and natural history. During this survey, 28 species in seven genera were documented in Wisconsin, with 10 species considered new state records.
  • An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods

    An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods

    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods Gary L Parsons Gerasimos Cassis Andrew R. Moldenke John D. Lattin Norman H. Anderson Jeffrey C. Miller Paul Hammond Timothy D. Schowalter U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon November 1991 Parson, Gary L.; Cassis, Gerasimos; Moldenke, Andrew R.; Lattin, John D.; Anderson, Norman H.; Miller, Jeffrey C; Hammond, Paul; Schowalter, Timothy D. 1991. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An annotated list of insects and other arthropods. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-290. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 168 p. An annotated list of species of insects and other arthropods that have been col- lected and studies on the H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. The list includes 459 families, 2,096 genera, and 3,402 species. All species have been authoritatively identified by more than 100 specialists. In- formation is included on habitat type, functional group, plant or animal host, relative abundances, collection information, and literature references where available. There is a brief discussion of the Andrews Forest as habitat for arthropods with photo- graphs of representative habitats within the Forest. Illustrations of selected ar- thropods are included as is a bibliography. Keywords: Invertebrates, insects, H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, arthropods, annotated list, forest ecosystem, old-growth forests.
  • Corrections for the Hemiptera: Heteroptera of Canada and Alaska

    Corrections for the Hemiptera: Heteroptera of Canada and Alaska

    J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 115, DECEMBER 2018 !25 Corrections for the Hemiptera: Heteroptera of Canada and Alaska G.G.E. SCUDDER1 ABSTRACT A total of 175 changes to the current checklist of Hemiptera: Heteroptera of Canada and Alaska are reported. Eighty deletions, eighty-eight nomenclature changes, and seven spelling corrections are detailed. In addition, comments are given on Anthocoris tomentosus Péricart, Orius diespeter Herring, O. tristicolor (White), and Tupiocoris agilis (Uhler). Key words: Changes, checklist, Heteroptera, Canada, Alaska INTRODUCTION Maw et al. (2000) published a checklist of the Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska, giving details of the occurrence of the species of Heteroptera. Since then, there have been a large number of taxonomic changes that have resulted in deletions and nomenclature modifications for many of the taxa. In addition, a few spelling errors have been noted. Details of the 175 changes are outlined here, and comments on four taxa are given. The order of taxa follows Maw et al. (2000), but species are listed in alphabetical order in each family. Museum abbreviations are as follows: CNC Canadian National Collection of Insects, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario RBCM Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, B.C. UAM University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, Alaska. UBCZ Spencer Entomological Collection, Beaty Biodiversity Museum (formerly Spencer Entomological Museum, Department of Zoology) University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. USNM National Museum of Natural History (formerly United States National Museum), Washington, D.C. SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT I. Deletions Family CORIXIDAE Glaenocorisa quadrata Walley This corixid was originally described by Walley (1930) from Quebec. Jaczewski and Lansbury (1961) followed Ossianilsson (1960) and considered G.
  • Heliomeris Multifloranutt

    Heliomeris Multifloranutt

    SHOWY GOLDENEYE Heliomeris multiflora Nutt. Asteraceae – Aster family Corey L. Gucker & Nancy L. Shaw | 2018 ORGANIZATION NOMENCLATURE Heliomeris multiflora Nutt., hereafter referred to as Names, subtaxa, chromosome number(s), hybridization. showy goldeneye, belongs to the Heliantheae tribe of the Asteraceae or Aster family (Schilling 2006). NRCS Plant Code. HEMU3 (USDA NRCS 2017). Range, habitat, plant associations, elevation, soils. Subtaxa. The Flora of North America recognizes three varieties: brevifolia (Greene ex. Wooton & Standl.) Yates, multiflora Nutt., and nevadensis (A. Life form, morphology, distinguishing characteristics, reproduction. Nelson) Yates (Schilling 2006). Synonyms. Gymnolomia brevifolia Green ex. Growth rate, successional status, disturbance ecology, importance to Wooton & Standl., Gymnolomia nevadensis A. animals/people. Nelson, and Viguiera multiflora (Nutt.) S.F. Blake (Schilling 2006). Current or potential uses in restoration. Common Names. Showy goldeneye, little sunflower, many-flowered sunflower, mountain sunflower, rosinweed (USDA FS 1937). Seed sourcing, wildland seed collection, seed cleaning, storage, Chromosome Number. Chromosome numbers are testing and marketing standards. 2n = 16, 18 for varieties brevifolia and multiflora (Keil and Pinkava 1976; Welsh et al. 1987) and 2n = 16, 18, or 32 for variety nevadensis (Solbrig et al. Recommendations/guidelines for producing seed. 1972; Hickman 1993; Schilling 2006). Hybridization. Showy goldeneye hybrids with other species were not reported in the literature. Recommendations/guidelines for producing planting stock. Recommendations/guidelines, wildland restoration successes/ DISTRIBUTION failures. Showy goldeneye is a western species. Variety Primary funding sources, chapter reviewers. multiflora is the most widely distributed, occurring in Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. Variety nevadensis is more southerly, occurring in Bibliography. California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and as far south as Jalisco, Mexico.
  • The Plant Bugs, Or Miridae

    The Plant Bugs, Or Miridae

    % STATE OF ILLINOIS DwiGHT H. Green, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Theodore H. Prison, Chief ^^olume 22 BULLETIN Article 1 The Plant Bugs, or Miridae, of Illinois HARRY^ H. KNIGHT Printed by Authority oj the State of Illinois URBANA, ILLINOIS September 1041 STATE OF ILLINOIS DwiGHT H. Green, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION Frank G. Thompson, Chairman William Trelease, D.Sc, LL.D., Biology William A. Noyes, Ph.D., LL.D. Chem.D. Forestry D.Sc, Chemistry Ezra J. Kraus, Ph.D., D.Sc, L. R. HowsoN, B.S.C.E., C.E., Engineering Edson S. Bastin, Ph.D., Geology Arthur Cutts Willard, D.Eng., LL.D., President of the University of Illinois NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Urbana, Illinois Scientific and Technical Staff Theodore H. Frison, Ph.D., Chief Section of Economic Entomology Section of Aquatic Biology W. P. Flint, B.S., Chief Entomologist David H. Thompson, Ph.D., Zoologist C. C. Compton, Ph.D., Associate Entomologist George W. Bennett, Ph.D., Limnologist M. D. Farrar, Ph.D., Research Entomologist D. F. Hansen, Ph.D., Assistant Zoologist Entomologist Bruno Limbach, B.S , Zoological /Assistant J. H. Bigger, B.S., Associate S. C. Chandler, B.S., Southern Field Entomolo- R. G. Rennels, M.F., Assistant Aquatic Biolo- gist gist Northern Field Ento- L. H. Shropshire, M.S., Section of Game Research and Management mologist Ralph E. Yeatter, Ph.D., Game Specialist B. G. Berger, M.A., Assistant Entomologist H.^B. Petty, B.A., Assistant, Entomology Ex- Section of Wildlife Experimental Areas tension Arthur S.
  • Cantharidin and Insects: an Historical Review

    Cantharidin and Insects: an Historical Review

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 17 Number 4 - Winter 1984 Number 4 - Winter Article 1 1984 December 1984 Cantharidin and Insects: An Historical Review Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Young, Daniel K. 1984. "Cantharidin and Insects: An Historical Review," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 17 (4) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol17/iss4/1 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Young: Cantharidin and Insects: An Historical Review 1984 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 187 CANTHARIDIN AND INSECTS: AN HISTORICAL REVIEW Daniel K. Young l ABSTRACT TIl.; defensive role played by cantharidin in meloid and oedemerid beetles has been well OOc\l11lenti!d. However. several groups of insects are known to orient positively toward the cberrrical or to the beetles which produce it: Miridae (Hemiptera); Pyrochroidae, An­ thicidae ,Coleoptera): Ceratopogonidae, Anthomyiidae (Diptera); and Braconidae tHymeoopteral. Literature citations are summarized for each of these taxa using current nomencla.tun: and indicating the nature of the association. \\rule re'.ie....ing literature pertinent to research on the systematics and bionomics of the genus Pedilu..s IColeoptera: Pyrochroidae), an intriguing association with a blister beetle I.\feloidael came to my attention. It involved the type specimen of P. impressus which was foond attached to the side of a Meloe angusticollis (Say 1827).
  • Compilation of Canthariphilous Insects 231-245 © Download

    Compilation of Canthariphilous Insects 231-245 © Download

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Beiträge zur Entomologie = Contributions to Entomology Jahr/Year: 2001 Band/Volume: 51 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hemp Claudia, Dettner Konrad Artikel/Article: Compilation of canthariphilous insects 231-245 ©www.senckenberg.de/; download www.contributions-to-entomology.org/ Beitr. Ent. Keltern ISSN 0005 - 805X 51 (2001) 1 S. 231 - 245 14.09.2001 Compilation of canthariphilous insects C l a u d ia H e m p an d K o n r a d D e t t n e r Summary A list of insects attracted to cantharidin is given. Most canthariphilous insects are found within the hetero­ meran beetle family Anthicidae with 190 species in the three subfamilies Anthicinae (184), Lemodiinae (1) and Tomoderinae (5). Further cantharidin baited species are known from the beetle families Endomychidae (5), Cleridae (4), Chrysomelidae (3), and Staphylinidae (1). In the beetle family Pyrochroidae 23 species from the subfamily Pedilinae and 6 species of the Pyrochroinae are canthariphilous. The insect order Diptera is represented by the families Anthomyiidae (3), Cecidomyidae (2), Ceratopogonidae (22) Chloro- pidae (1), Platystomatidae (1) and Sciaridae (5). Many species from the heteropteran family Miridae (29) are known to be attracted by cantharidin, also one species from the families Lygaeidae and Tingidae respectively. Parasites of the hymenopteran family Braconidae (6) show a positive reaction to cantharidin as well as species from the subfamily Diapriinae of the family Diapriidae. Chemical analyses of a fulgorid and a cicadid species revealed that also species of Homoptera may contain cantharidin.
  • Hemiptera) of the Prairies Ecozone of Canada

    Hemiptera) of the Prairies Ecozone of Canada

    283 Chapter 10 The Heteroptera (Hemiptera) of the Prairies Ecozone of Canada G.G.E. Scudder Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Tel: 604 822 3682, Fax: 604 822 2416 Email: [email protected] Abstract. Five hundred eighty-two Heteroptera taxa are listed for the Prairies Ecozone in Canada. This number represents 40.7% of the taxa reported for Canada and 79.2% of the taxa recorded from the three Prairie Provinces. The dominant components are species with a Nearctic distribution, excluding Beringia. However, the Great Basin-Prairies element is the most distinctive. Introduction Maw et al. (2000) listed the Heteroptera recorded from the three Prairie Provinces in Canada. Brooks and Kelton (1967) considered the aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, while Scudder et al. (2010) documented the aquatic Hemiptera recorded from the prairie grasslands and parkland. In the terrestrial Heteroptera, Kelton (1980) treated the plant bugs of the Prairie Provinces, and subsequent individual taxonomic papers have advanced the knowledge of many of the genera. Matsuda (1977) included prairie species in his consideration for the Aradidae of Canada, and Kelton (1978) did likewise for the Anthocoridae (s.l.). The only detailed annotated provincial list of Heteroptera available is that of Strickland (1953) for the province of Alberta, but this is now somewhat out of date. There are no published annotated lists for the provinces of Manitoba or Saskatchewan. Data Sources All species of Heteroptera listed from the provinces of Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan in Maw et al.
  • Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Stenodemini) from Western Canada and Northwestern United States

    Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Stenodemini) from Western Canada and Northwestern United States

    Zootaxa 3174: 51–58 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Two new species of Trigonotylus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Stenodemini) from western Canada and northwestern United States G. G. E. SCUDDER1 & MICHAEL D. SCHWARTZ2 1Beaty Biodiversity Centre and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4. E-mail: [email protected] 2Division of Invertebrate Zoology (Entomology) American Museum of Natural History, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Car- ling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Two new species of stenodemine Miridae from western Canada and the United States are described. Trigonotylus exilis n. sp. from British Columbia to northern California and Utah, and T. setosus n. sp. from northern British Columbia, Yukon Territory, and adjacent northern Northwest Territories and Alaska are documented. A key to the species of Trigonotylus from this study region is provided to allow identification of the included fauna. Host plant species are identified. Lactic acid is proposed as an alternative to potash as a dissection medium for male genitalia. Key words: Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae, Stenodemini, Trigonotylus, new species, Canada, key Introduction Further research on collections of Canadian Heteroptera has resulted in the discovery of two new species of Trigo- notylus Fieber, 1858 from western Canada and the United States. The systematics of Trigonotylus is well estab- lished (Schwartz, 2008) and the taxonomy is presented in revisions, including keys to species, for the world (Carvalho and Wagner, 1957), China (Zheng, et al.
  • A Survey of the Insects of White Sands National Monument, Tularosa

    A Survey of the Insects of White Sands National Monument, Tularosa

    A Surveyof the Insects of White Sands National Monument,Tularosa Basin, New Mexico' ClydeP. Stroud Universityof Chicago INTRODUCTION Most of the insectsreported here were collectedin and around White Sands National Monumentbetween June 5, 1947 and August 9, 1947. There are a fewrecords from collections made June20-21, 1946 and recordsof two species furnishedby othercollectors. A large numberof recordsof other arthropocswill be reportedin a subsequentpaper. The White Sands National Monumentis situatedin Tularosa Basin (Fig. 1), an area of internaldrainage bounded on the east and westby a seriesof faultranges and by relativelyhigh ground on the northand south. The chief depositof the basin is valleyfill. In additionto the White Sands, thereare severalother large areas of ecologicalimportance. West of the White Sands and adjacentto thatarea is a largesalt flat. At the south end of this flatis an intermittentsalt lake, Lake Lucero. North of the White Sands and not quite contiguouswith that area is the "malpais," a recentlava deposition. South of the White Sands and separatedfrom it by a distanceof about 20 miles is a large area of reddishsilica dunes. This dunes area surroundsthe low Jarillamountains and extendsinto the Hueco Basin to the south. The White Sands National Monument (Fig. 2) includesa part of an almostunique typeof habitat,consisting of dunes of finecrystalline gypsum, some as high as 50 feet,alternating with "flats" or level inter-dunalareas. The substrateof the southernpart of thisarea is composedalmost entirely of calciumsulfate. In the northernpart thereis much more admixtureof silica and othermaterials. The geologicalhistory of the White Sands deposithas been studiedby Vandiver (1936), Potter (1938) and others. Biotic conditionsin the White Sands are of great interest.
  • Taxonomy and Evolution of the Orthotyline Genus Lopidea (Heteroptera: Miridae) Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: //John D

    Taxonomy and Evolution of the Orthotyline Genus Lopidea (Heteroptera: Miridae) Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: //John D

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Adam Asquith for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomologypresented onJune 29, 1990. Title:Taxonomy and Evolution of the Orthotyline Genus Lopidea (Heteroptera: Miridae) Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: //John D. Lattin The genus Lopidea Uhler is revised for America north of Mexico. The relationship of Lopidea to other orthotyline generais discussed and itis proposed that the genus Ilnacora Reuter is the sister group of Lopidea. Forty-eight species of Lopidea are recognized in North America, one of which is described asnew. The following synonymies are created (junior names first): Lopidea navajo Knight = L. arizonae Knight; L. chelifer Knight= L. balli Knight; L. paddocki Knight and L. deserta Knight = L. bullata Knight; L. trispicata Knight= L. chandleri Moore; L. burkei Knight = L.confraterna (Gibson); L. arkansae Knight and L. biselli Knight = L. davisi Knight; L. denmani Knight and Schaffner = L. falcicula Knight; L. mohave Knight = L. garryae Knight; L. amorphae Knight and L. wisteriae Chandler = L. hesperus (Kirkaldy); L. marginalis (Reuter) = L. instabilis (Reuter); L. texana Knight, L. polingorum Knight and L. matamorensis Knight= L. major Knight; L. drakei Knight = L. marginata Uhler; L. phlogis Knight, L. petalostemi Knight and L. lohnstoni Knight = L. minor Knight; Lopidea raineri Knight, Lopidea sculleni Knight, Lopidea rolfsi Knight and Lopidea wilcoxi Knight= Lopidea nigridia nigridia Uhler; Lopidea nigridea hirta Van Duzee, Lopidea usingeri Van Duzee, Lopidea discreta Van Duzee, Lopidea fallax Knight,Lopidea nicholi Knight,Lopidea vakima Knight,Lopidea audeni Knight,Lopidea eriogoni Knight, Lopidea calcaria Knight, Lopidea chamberlini Knight, Lopidea anqustata Knight, Lopidea rubrofusca Knight and LopideaflavicostataKnightandSchaffner = Lopidea nigridia aculeata Van Duzee; Lopidea medleri Akingbohungbe = Lopidea nigridia serica Knight Uhler; L.oregona Hsiao, L.