DOCSLIB.ORG

Assembly Minutes Rotterdam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assembly Minutes Rotterdam IAG International General Assembly ROTTERDAM 30th May 2015 Minutes Present: see list attached at end 1) Chairman’s welcome and Committee update The Chairman welcomed all delegates. She mentioned the recent sad death of Hanjo Hillmann, a friend and colleague to many delegates, one of IAG’s most popular characters, and led the delegates in a minute’s silence to remember him. She and the Vice-Chairman outlined recent developments and activities by the Committee. 2) Minutes of Hong Kong Assembly, 6th February 2015 The minutes from Hong Kong were reviewed and approved without amendment. 3) Host Firm Presentation Jan de Rooij of Ten Holter Noordam made interesting presentations outlining details of his firm to the Assembly, and introducing the port and commercial centre of Rotterdam. 4) Accounts 2014 The Treasurer introduced the 2014 audited accounts, and offered to answer any questions. Nick Burnett asked what level of retained surplus the Committee felt it advisable to keep. The Treasurer answered that €100,000 would be the absolute minimum figure, but it would be preferable to have a substantial safety margin above that. The Chairman then requested approval of the Financial Statements by a show of hands, which was unanimously in favour, with no votes against or abstentions. 5) Membership matters Having asked the representatives of potential members to withdraw, the Chairman introduced a Committee statement about membership of IAG by firms who were also members of members of the Schindhelm alliance. Franz Mittendorfer spoke at length confirming the statement’s view of Schindhelm and explaining more detail about the alliance and its policies. A detailed discussion followed, including contributions from Thomas Roeskens, Rolf Ritzinger, Alois Hutterer, Denis Philippe, Stuart Haynes and Johannes Thoma. 1 The Chairman reiterated the Committee’s intentions, firstly to propose SDZ Schindhelm of Warsaw for ratification as members of IAG at the next meeting, and secondly to explore whether it was viable to create an agreement enabling the Schindhelm Shanghai office to be behave and be treated, for the purposes of potential IAG membership, as if it were an independent firm. A show of hands taken to support these intentions was overwhelmingly in favour. The Chairman then proposed the ratification of Sallux Advisory, lawyers, of Seoul, South Korea, as members of IAG. This was approved unanimously, with no votes against or abstentions, and Sallux Advisory were accordingly ratified. 6) KSI update Matt Meadows of KSI gave a short update on developments within KSI and in the IAG-KSI relationship. 7) Committee and Auditor elections The Assembly was briefly addressed by all the candidates for Committee offices and places. Following this, the count of a secret ballot showed that the following had been elected: - Daden Hunt as Chairman, in his second term on the Committee to 2017 - Iben Lindhardt as Vice-Chairman, and for a second term on the Committee to 2018 - Mitch Marinello as Secretary, in his first term to 2017 - Stuart Haynes as a Committee member, for a first term to 2018 - Rupert Neudorfer as a Committee members, for a first term to 2018 and - Andreas Hahn as auditor for the financial year 2015 8) Future meetings Ioanna Kostoula and Marina Polyzou of Host firm Serafim Sotiriadis and Associates presented their firm’s excellent plans for the Athens Assembly in October. It was announced that the first venue for 2016 would be Turin, to include an optional skiing day. 9) Any other business The Chairman invited delegates to raise any items of other business, but none were raised. She then thanked all delegates for their participation and declared the formal part of the meeting closed. The Assembly then reconvened into Specialist Groups for short sessions. See list of delegates present overleaf… 2 PRESENT Delegates AUSTRALIA PLN Australia John Ridgway Lawyers, Sydney IAG Committee Member AUSTRIA Dr. Allichhammer & Co Wolfgang Allichhammer Tax Consultants & Auditors, Vienna Neudorfer Rechtsanwälte GmbH Wolfgang Zacherl Lawyers, Vienna IAG Committee Member SCWP Schindhelm Alois Hutterer Lawyers, Linz Franz Mittendorfer BELGIUM Philippe & Partners Denis Philippe Lawyers, Brussels BRAZIL Buccioli,Craveiro e Braz de Oliveira Fabio Buccioli Advogados Associados Lawyers, São Paulo CANADA Pallett Valo LLP Anne Kennedy Lawyers, Mississauga, Ontario CZECH REPUBLIC Saxinger Chalupsky & Partner V.O.S Roman Solc Lawyers, Prague DENMARK Ellebye Lawyers Iben Lindhardt Lawyers, Odense C IAG Secretary Birte Veggerby ENGLAND Aaron & Partners LLP Nick Clarke Lawyers, Manchester Stuart Haynes Birketts LLP Daden Hunt Lawyers, Ipswich IAG Vice-Chairman Nick Burnett Andrew Wood Kingston Sorel International (KSI) Matt Meadows Accountancy Network, Worldwide Ormerod Rutter Peter Orton Accountants, Droitwich, England Colm McGrory FRANCE Colbert Denis Simon Lawyers, Lyon Jean-Luc Dury Sophie Dechelette-Roy Cécile Dessapt GERMANY Maack & Company Birge Roemer Tax Consultants, Hamburg THORWART Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater Alexander Frey Wirtschaftsprüfer Partnerschaft mbB Christiane Eifler 3 Lawyers, Tax Consultants & Accountants Nürnberg Hahn & Partner Andreas Hahn Accountants & Tax Advisers, Hamburg Appelhagen Rechtsanwälte Joachim Gulich Steuerberater PartGmbB Lawyers, Braunschweig Fingerhut Rechtsanwälte Stefan Karg Lawyers & Tax Advisers, Munich Rolf Ritzinger Küttner Rechtsanwälte Silke Seeger Lawyers, Cologne de Faria & Partner Thomas Roeskens Lawyers & Notaries, Wiesbaden Silke Giesa HTG Wirtschaftsprüfung GmbH Stephanie Bschorr Accountants & Tax Advisers, Berlin-Mitte Reiners Rogge Rechtsanwälte Clemens Rogge Lawyers, Dusseldorf Johannes Thoma GREECE Serafim Sotiriadis & Associates Ioanna Kostoula Lawyers, Athens Marina Polyzou INDIA ALMT Legal Sameer Tapia Lawyers, Mumbai, India ISLE OF MAN Maitland Richard Taylor Lawyers & Fiduciaire, Douglas ITALY Studio Alinovi Guiotto Ferrari Paolo Alinovi & Mattioli Cristian Tundo Tax Advisers & Accountants, Parma LIECHTENSTEIN Juricon Trust Company Establishment Rupert Neudorfer Lawyers, Trustees & Accountants Vaduz NETHERLANDS HOST FIRM: Ten Holter Noordam Advocaten Jan de Rooij Lawyers, Rotterdam & Dordrecht Kees Mijs Emiel de Joode Van Hoesel de Blaey Peter Jan van Noortwijk Accountants & Tax Advisers, Ruby de Vries Rotterdam. (KSi Members) PORTUGAL Alves Pereira, Teixeira de Sousa João Pedro Alves Pereira & Associates Lawyers, Lisbon SINGAPORE DFDL Singapore Pte. Ltd Marcus Collins Lawyers, SE Asia 4 SPAIN Fernando Scornik Gerstein Nayra Prado Marrero Lawyers, Madrid, Barcelona & IAG Chairman Las Palmas SWEDEN Rosengrens Advokatbyrå AB Katarina Hallin Lawyers, Gothenburg Gunnard Holst Cederlöv Advocacy Mikael Holst Lawyers, Stockholm SWITZERLAND Staiger Schwald & Partner AG Natalie Peter Lawyers, Zurich USA Devereaux Kuhner and Chin, LLP Francis Custodio Accountants, San Francisco Foulston Siefkin Harvey Sorensen Lawyers, Wichita Novack & Macey LLP Mitchell Marinello Lawyers, Chicago IAG Committee Member Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah James Miller Lawyers, Media, Pennsylvania, USA Nathan Zipperian Ron Kravitz Spagnoletti & Co Frank Spagnoletti Lawyers, Houston CANDIDATES FOR RATIFICATION Sallux Advisory Limited Donghoon Yi Lawyers, Seoul, South Korea PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS SDZ Schindhelm Tomasz Szarek Lawyers, Warsaw, Poland IAG Administration Office Christopher Whitamore 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Security, Turkish Foreign Policy and Article 5 of the NATO Treaty
    sallux ECPM FOUNDATION European security, Turkish foreign policy and Article 5 of the NATO Treaty JOHANNES DE JONG & CHRISTIAAN MEINEN Do NATO member states have a duty to protect Turkey while Turkey at the same time threatens NATO and European security and stability? This publication clarifies that NATO members can withhold (Article 5) protection without changing the NATO Treaty or expelling Turkey from NATO. European, Canadian and American citizens can be informed that the military of their countries will not protect Turkey and the Erdogan government. The question Source: periodista.gr is if European, Canadian and US politicians have the courage to do so. sallux European security ECPM FOUNDATION 3 Key takeaways from this paper 1. The EU, US, Canada and NATO are struggling with the question of how to deal with Turkey. This publication of- fers an overview of Turkish behaviour since 2013 and a viable way forward in how to counter it. The strategy that this publication suggests is that NATO Member States, backed by their Parliaments or Congress, will state that Turkey can no longer count on protection based on Article 5 of the NATO Treaty until Turkey changes its behaviour. 2. This publication maintains that Turkish external behav- iour since 2013 is based on the ideological agenda of President Erdogan’s AKP government. The domestic oppression of Kurds, opposition, and all forms of free Diyanet minister Ali Erbaş holding a sword, ‘neo-Ottomanism’. Turning Hagia Sofia speech mirrors that agenda as well. in the Ottoman tradition, as he gives the into a mosque symbolised and clarified 3.
    [Show full text]
  • European Political Foundations
    Directorate-General for Finance Directorate for Political Structures Financing and Resources Political Structures Financing Unit Grants from the European Parliament to political foundations at European level per foundation per year February 2020 Maximum grant Final grant** ( € Foundation 4 Address Country Website Year* awarded ( € ) ) 2008/2 106.608 106.608 2009 147.929 146.575 2010 212.544 155.801 2011 252.450 249.940 2012 259.134 199.585 2013 249.695 226.802 Coppieters Foundation (former Centrum Boomwekereijstraat 1 European Free Alliance Belgium www.cmc-foundation.eu 2014 267.388 216.380 Maurits Coppetiers) B-1000 Brussels 2015 297.500 240.601 2016 324.930 318.411 2017 457.035 365.038 2018 479.887 388.702 2019 534.179 2020 567.165 2008/2 233.750 172.187 2009 725.200 609.356 2010 818.438 658.097 2011 942.819 804.634 2012 1.075.703 995.300 Alliance of Liberals and Democrats 2013 1.270.187 1.107.696 for Europe Party Rue des Deux Eglises 37/39 B- European Liberal Forum Belgium www.liberalforum.eu 2014 1.362.890 941.281 (before European Liberal Democrat 1000 Brussels 2015 984.981 879.840 and Reform Party) 2016 1.391.869 1.126.430 2017 1.487.768 1.164.869 2018 1.761.857 1.650.538 2019 1.798.601 2020 2.710.157 2008/2 1.208.700 1.208.436 2009 1.950.000 1.946.131 2010 2.150.000 2.136.476 2011 2.714.798 2.709.255 2012 2.802.702 2.794.525 2013 2.839.002 2.762.310 Foundation for European Progressive rue Montoyer 40 Party of European Socialists Belgium www.feps-europe.eu 2014 3.086.695 3.086.695 Studies B-1000 Brussels 2015 4.089.429 3.847.808
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook 2016
    YEARBOOK 2016 FOR A EUROPE OF DIGNITY , FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY We want to thank all our partners for their cooperation in the past year. A special word of gratitude for the VOE foundation and the FICDD who have supported several of our events. We also thank our colleagues from Sallux for all their assistance and support. contents European Christian Political Movement | design joanne.vanbeuse.com | © ECPM 2017 YEARBOOK 2016 EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN POLITICAL MOVEMENT “we believe that the Christian culture embeds fundamental freedoms that are virtuous for European societies” CONTENTS ABOUT ECPM 7 WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT 11 REFLECTION ON 2016 13 ADVISORY COUNCIL REPORT 15 INTRODUCTION OF 2016 EVENTS & CONFERENCES 17 FIRST QUARTER • Freedom of Religion or Belief Intergroup/Launch of Open Doors’ 2016 Watch List 19 • The Rights of Parents and Children belonging to Religious Minorities 19 • National Prayer Breakfast, Washington DC 20 • Europartners in Jerusalem 20 • Prayer meeting 20 • Sallux roundtable Response to the asylum crisis along the refugee route 21 • Finnish Prayer Breakfast 21 • Christian Social Congress 22 SECOND QUARTER • ECPM KD event, Helsinki/Stockholm 25 • The role of Christian communities in a new Middle East 25 • ChristenUnie Congress 26 • Ukrainian National Prayer Breakfast and Forum 26 • ECPM General Assembly 27 • Crossing the border: Giving direction to the refugee debate in a divided Europe 27 • FoRB Intergroup. Presentation of the Report on the State of Religion or Belief in 28 the World 2015-2016 THIRD QUARTER • Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Political Groups in the European Parliament Since 1979: Key Facts and Figures
    Political groups in the European Parliament since 1979 Key facts and figures STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Christian Salm Historical Archives Unit PE 637.958 – June 2019 EN Political groups in the European Parliament since 1979: Key facts and figures EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR Christian Salm, Historical Archives Unit, EPRS To contact the author, please email: [email protected] ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Historical Archives Unit of the Directorate for the Library, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in June 2019. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. Brussels © European Union, 2019. PE 637.958 ISBN: 978-92-846-4858-0 DOI:10.2861/23770 CAT: QA-01-19-517-EN-N [email protected] http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu (intranet) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (internet) http://epthinktank.eu (blog) Political groups in
    [Show full text]
  • "Populist" Politics at EU Level Morijn, John
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen Responding to "populist" politics at EU level Morijn, John Published in: International Journal of Constitutional Law DOI: 10.1093/icon/moz030 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2019 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Morijn, J. (2019). Responding to "populist" politics at EU level: Regulation 1141/2014 and beyond. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(2), 617-640. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz030 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 11-12-2019 © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections to the European Parliament
    Election-Watch.EU – wahlbeobachtung.org Elections to the European Parliament 23-26 May 2019 ELECTION-WATCH.EU Needs Assessment Mission Final Report Brussels 28 February 2019 The views expressed in this report are solely the views of Election-Watch.EU and the authors of this report TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1 II. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 III. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT ................................................................... 2 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM ...................................................... 4 FOLLOW UP TO RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 6 UNITED KINGDOM WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EU ....................................................................... 6 THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM ......................................................................................................... 6 THE RIGHT TO VOTE .................................................................................................................. 7 PARTICIPATION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES .................................................................... 8 THE RIGHT TO STAND ................................................................................................................ 8 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tip of the Iceberg: Religious Extremist Funders Against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018
    TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018 TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 – 2018 ISBN: 978 2 93102920 6 Tip of the Iceberg: Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018 Written by Neil Datta, Secretary of the European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights. Brussels, June 2021 Copyright © EPF 2021 All Rights Reserved. The contents of this document cannot be reproduced without prior permission of the author. EPF is a network of members of parliaments from across Europe who are committed to protecting the sexual and reproductive health of the world’s most vulnerable people, both at home and overseas. We believe that women should always have the right to decide upon the number of children they wish to have, and should never be denied the education or other means to achieve this that they are entitled to. Find out more on epfweb.org and by following @EPF_SRR on Twitter. 2 TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 – 2018 Tip of the Iceberg is the first attempt understand the anti-gender mobilisation in Europe through the perspective of their funding base. This report assembles financial data covering a ten year period of over 50 anti-gender actors operating in Europe. It then takes a deeper look at how religious extremists generate this funding to roll back human rights in sexuality and reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Tip of the Iceberg
    TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018 TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 – 2018 ISBN: 978 2 93102920 6 Tip of the Iceberg: Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018 Written by Neil Datta, Secretary of the European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights. Brussels, June 2021 Copyright © EPF 2021 All Rights Reserved. The contents of this document cannot be reproduced without prior permission of the author. EPF is a network of members of parliaments from across Europe who are committed to protecting the sexual and reproductive health of the world’s most vulnerable people, both at home and overseas. We believe that women should always have the right to decide upon the number of children they wish to have, and should never be denied the education or other means to achieve this that they are entitled to. Find out more on epfweb.org and by following @EPF_SRR on Twitter. 2 TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 – 2018 Tip of the Iceberg is the first attempt understand the anti-gender mobilisation in Europe through the perspective of their funding base. This report assembles financial data covering a ten year period of over 50 anti-gender actors operating in Europe. It then takes a deeper look at how religious extremists generate this funding to roll back human rights in sexuality and reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Timisoara Times
    The Timisoara Times Areopagus Centre; 104 Calea Martirilor, 300774 Timisoara; Romania Centre for Christian Studies Tel: +40-256-487485 and Contemporary Culture E-mail: [email protected], Internet: www.areopagus.ro No. 49/2016 OUR SERVICE FOR THE KING As we approach the end of 2018, we are encouraged to see once again the many ways in which God has showed His faithfulness to us, as we have tried to play out our roles as instruments for the furtherance of His kingdom in our part of the world. In view of the coming Christmas celebration, we pray that the new-born King (now the glori- fied Lord) will accept our small acts of service as a token of our heartfelt love for Him. OUR MASTERS’ PROGRAM in theology and social work continues to be the strongest and solid Master’s program of the Social Work Department of the West University of Timisoara. By God’s grace, our 38 current students, together with their professors, are passionately exploring ways in which the Christian faith can make a posi- tive impact in our fallen world. THANKS TO OUR PARTNERS FROM SALLUX (the Netherlands), we continued the Cambridge Papers translation projects and 6 new titles/articles were translated and distributed in Romania and to Romanians living abroad. The resources are available both in a digital and printed format: Worshiping God with technology (Denis Alexan- der), Finding security in the ‘risk society’ (Amy Donovan), Uniformity or mutuality? The new equality law in Chris- tian perspective (Julian Rivers), The Human Identity Crisis: Can we do without the Trinity? (Michael Ovey), Mercy not Sacrifice -Mosaic law in Christian social ethics (Jason Fletcher), How to create a relational society: Foundations for a new social order (Michael Schluter).
    [Show full text]
  • The Eu and Its Populism Paradox: Examining an Uneasily Soft Underbelly
    EUSA MAY 2019 CONFERENCE – WORK IN PROGRESS – DO NOT QUOTE OR CIRCULATE THE EU AND ITS POPULISM PARADOX: EXAMINING AN UNEASILY SOFT UNDERBELLY John Morijn1 1. Introduction The populist wave across Europe is a fundamental challenge to the European Union (EU) as currently tasked and functioning. For someone strongly believing in the possible virtues of European integration it is hard even to formulate the following: by the substantive direction the EU choses to act on today’s key policy areas of migration and economic/monetary matters, and by how it does so in a manner that is felt to fall short and fragments democratic control between the national and EU level while functioning in highly technocratic ways, it puts ever greater pressure on liberal democracy in Europe. Yes: the EU may very well itself unwittingly contribute to populism. At the same time and adding to the complexity, that same EU, on the reasoning that European integration can only stably be guaranteed if all Member States ensure the minimum guarantees of Article 2 TEU, currently prominently and importantly attempts to act on the role entrusted to it to suppress democratic backsliding. It does so with regard to Member State level populism, for example through Article 7 TEU. It has also acted at EU-level to avoid populists becoming effective within its own democratic structures by introducing a compulsory electoral threshold for EP elections2 and linking EU-level party funding to compliance with basic EU values and verifying this.3 1 LLM EU Law (College of Europe, Bruges), PhD international law (European University Institute, Florence); Assistant professor of European human rights law, University of Groningen; Emile Noël Fellow 2018-19, New York University School of Law Jean Monnet Center.
    [Show full text]
  • What Future for European Defence: One Size Fits All?
    sallux ECPM FOUNDATION WHAT FUTURE FOR EUROPEAN DEFENCE: ONE SIZE FITS ALL? Angelo Delsen & Christiaan Meinen A reflection on the European Commission’s plans and a proposal for an alternative approach sallux 2 ECPM FOUNDATION TOWARDS A RELATIONAL EUROPE In June 2017 the European Commission (EC) launched its ‘Reflection Paper on the Future of European Defence’. It sketches a European security context characterized by military, economic and energy related threats to our east, next to vulnerable and ungoverned spaces of conflict to our south. This article is an initial response to the findings of the reflection paper and the wider federalist plans we see often these days. The European Union (EU) currently has a principle in place which is called: subsidiar- ity1. All measures, agreements and working plans should be seen from this perspective. In this light Defence matters fall under the ultimate political authority of the sovereign state(s). Only states can have a standing army, so the issue of all European Defence matters immediately touch the very nature of EU member states and the EU itself. lems the EU states have to deal with (2017). First of all, the European states have according to the EC neglected their defence budgets. On the contrary, the EC sees that competing pow- ers have increased their military spending’s. Secondly, many of the threats faced by Europe do not respect national borders, as greater con- nectivity is blurring the boundaries between internal and external security. To further ex- plain the claim that European military spend- ing is neglected, the EC writes that European capabilities lag behind others, while there are differences in member states’ contributions in European defence.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Foundations: Models for the Case of Kosovo
    Political Foundations: Models for the Case of Kosovo POLITICAL FOUNDATIONS: MODELS FOR THE CASE OF KOSOVO SEPTEMBER 2020 www.kas.de Political Foundations: Models for the Case of Kosovo The expressed views do not necessarily reflect the stance of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS), fellows and PIPS Board Members. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted without the permission of PIPS ©. 2 Political Foundations: Models for the Case of Kosovo Table of Contents 1. Introduction 6 2. Political foundations 7 2.1 Political foundations in Germany 8 2.2 Political foundations in different context 13 2.3 From national to transnational: Political Foundations at the European Level 18 2.4 Challenges related to political foundations 23 3. Political parties in Kosovo 25 3.1 Political foundations: Current state of affairs 28 3.2 The importance of political foundations in Kosovo 32 4. Models of political foundations for the case of Kosovo 33 4.1 Organogram of political foundations 38 5. Conclusion 39 3 Political Foundations: Models for the Case of Kosovo EFA IRI European Free Allaince The International Republican Institute EL ISA European Left Institute for Studies and Analysis ELF KAS European Liberal Forum Konrad Adenauer Foundation ENoP KIB European Network of Political Foundations Kurdish Institute of Brussels EP KLA European Parliament Kosovo Liberation Army EPP LDK Shkurtesat European People’s Party Democratic League of Kosovo EU MENF AAK European Union Movement for a Europe of Nations and Freedom Alliance for Kosovo’s Future FDP NDI
    [Show full text]