Safe Standing – What Are Rail Seats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Safe Standing – What Are Rail Seats © Stadionwelt.de What Are Rail Seats? Robust metal seats with a high back forming Rail seats are widely used in Germany. a sturdy rail for safe standing. Fitted in place UK distribution is via the supplier of all of normal seats they link together to create a 60,000 seats for the Emirates Stadium. continuous, strong rail right along the row. The hihistorystory of rail seats Height and strength comply with government German football clubs see standing as requirements. They are also approved for an integral part of fan culture. Every use as seats by UEFA and FIFA, e.g. for ground provides standing areas. At World Cup and Champions League matches. 2011 champions Borussia Dortmund, for instance, there is standing for 27,000 The seats fold up flush between the uprights, fans, a third of the stadium capacity. thus creating wider clearways than along rows of normal seats. In 2000, the clubs faced a challenge. UEFA stipulated that grounds staging BENEFITS OF THE RAIL SEAT SOLUTION Champions League and UEFA Cup • Answers fans’ call for choice games had to be all-seater. What to do? • Makes football more socially inclusive The clubs were committed to standing • Counters problems of ageing fan base but had to comply with UEFA’s new • Safer than standing at low-backed seats rules. They found three solutions. One • Saves money on seat repairs was ‘Variositze’, ‘rail seats’ to us. • Better access for paramedics / stewards • Rails make it harder for offenders to flee Some clubs with rail seats: Hannover 96, Werder Bremen, Stuttgart, Hoffenheim, • Stadium remains UEFA / FIFA compliant Wolfsburg, Bayer Leverkusen and HSV. A solution for the UK? We believe that rail seats now present a solution to the situation in the UK, where sizable numbers of fans want to stand, the authorities need to ensure maximum safety and top clubs need to comply with UEFA/FIFA requirements. While seats can remain locked in the ‘up’ position for standing use, club staff can quickly unlock them in advance of UEFA/ FIFA games with a special key (right). Limited numbers Standing areas representing 10-15% of stadium capacity might be appropriate. 85-90% would thus remain exclusively for fans who prefer to sit. Numbers could be limited to one fan per rail seat or, if clubs wished, a second row of fans could be accommodated by adding a rear step along each row. Why rail seats are a good idea Rail seat crosscross----sectionsection views Three popular myths: Creating designated safe standing MythMyth: “ Standing is unsafe .” Not truetrue. areas in grounds that are currently Looking along a row all-seater by installing rail seats has The Government’s Green Guide to numerous benefits: Seats fold up flush between safety at sports grounds recognises the uprights, leaving a wide that standing is safe. It sets out due • clearway with no trip hazards Choice safety standards for standing areas. A Football Fans Census in 2007 We do not want these abolished or showed that 92% of fans want the weakened, but applied consistently to choice to sit or stand. football at all levels. • Enhanced enjoyment Many opponents of safe standing cite In a Premier League survey in 2008 Hillsborough as evidence of standing 15% of over 30,000 respondents said being unsafe. Yet the tragedy was not standing enhanced their enjoyment caused by standing; the Taylor Report of the game. In line with this, we’re primarily blamed overcrowding, poor suggesting 10-15% of a stadium policing and bad stadium layout. might be designated for standing. MythMyth: “ There’s no appetite from fans • Increased crowd safety for standing areas and it’s unfair on The reality in many Premier League those who wish to sit .” Not truetrue. and Championship grounds today – despite the all-seater requirements – Every week thousands of fans stand in is that hundreds, if not thousands, of front of their seats for the duration of fans stand at every game and many the game - attempts to stop this have clubs turn a blind eye. failed. Surveys regularly show the vast majority of supporters** back having a These fans are standing in areas not Between the uprights the choice to sit or stand. Nor is this issue designed for the purpose. They are space can be configured for just about those who prefer to stand. standing behind seats with low backs one row of fans (above) or for By giving supporters the choice, all or sometimes no backs at all. Any two rows (below) fans benefit. Those who wish to stand slight push can send them toppling can do so, while those who prefer to forward. Indeed, a report in 2009 for sit no longer have to worry about their the Premier League concluded that view being blocked. "standing in seated areas must be regarded as a significant risk". Myth - “ Statistics show that standing areas are less safe than seated ones .” Allocating fans who wish to stand a Not truetrue. designated standing area designed specifically for the purpose with rails The Football Licensing Authority (FLA) along every row of seats removes collects statistics giving numbers of this risk and fulfils the club’s duty of injuries for each ground. The injury care to its customers. rates are very low and, although slightly higher in grounds that retain • Improved social inclusion standing accommodation, they do not 74% of Premier League fans come distinguish where injuries occurred from the top two social classes, their (seats, standing area, concourse etc). average age is 42 and they’ve been Nor do they correlate that area with going to games for 22 years*. Rail the type of injury (e.g. wasp stings are seats offer clubs an opportunity to not related to standing or seating) or redress this demographic imbalance. take into account other factors such An optional extra line of fans on each For occasional UEFA/FIFA as the age of the stand. Although it row permits more socially inclusive games the seat is unlocked has previously been claimed that the pricing, while still maintaining or and lowered figures show that sitting is safer than even increasing overall revenue. standing, the FLA now agrees that the • Greater crowd control statistical analysis is not detailed Admission to areas of rail seats will enough to draw that conclusion. be controlled just as for normal seats by numbered, barcoded tickets. Any Contact: individual who misbehaves and tries to elude apprehension will find their Jon Darch - Safe Standing Roadshow T: 01761 463100 E: [email protected] movement restricted by the rails - W: www.safestandingroadshow.co.uk more so than in areas of normal Malcolm Clarke - Football Supporters Federation seats or on lower league terraces. T: 0330 44 000 44 E: [email protected] W: www.fsf.org.uk • Easier paramedic access Rail seats fold up flush between the Michael Burnett – Ferco Seating Systems Ltd T: 08458 123100 E: [email protected] uprights, which are just 50mm deep. W: www.fercoseating.co.uk The clearway space along a row of a typical grandstand is thus 750mm, * Premier League National Fan Survey, season more than twice that along many 2006/07 (sample: 26,014) rows of normal seats, thus making it much easier to access and exit. ** FSF National Supporters Survey, 90% back choice .
Recommended publications
  • Consultation on Seated and Standing Accommodation at Football League Matches Contents
    CONSULTATION ON SEATED AND STANDING ACCOMMODATION AT FOOTBALL LEAGUE MATCHES CONTENTS Executive Summary ..............................................3 Scope .....................................................................4 Background ...........................................................5 Legislation and Regulations ................................7 What is Rail Seating? ...........................................9 Standing in modern stadia ................................10 Case Studies .......................................................12 The Public Debate ..............................................14 The Process for Change ....................................16 Considerations for Clubs ...................................18 Implementing Rail Seating .................................19 Questions for Clubs ...........................................21 List of References ..............................................22 All-Seater/Rail Seating Questionnaire ..............23 December 2013 Football League Operations Centre Edward VII Quay, Preston, Lancashire PR2 2YF Tel: 0844 826 5188 Football League Commercial Office 30 Gloucester Place, London W1U 8FL Tel: 0844 826 3103 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Football League Clubs have requested that The Football League review the ‘all-seater’ stadia requirement in the second tier of English football and investigate the issue of ‘rail seating’. This document sets out the current legislative, public policy and regulatory framework and what steps would be required for a change to the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Football Supporters’ Federation and the Peterborough Council for Voluntary Service
    Please Take Care of our Environment Recycle this Newsletter if no longer required IN POSH WE TRUST Patron :- Tommy Robson Members of Supporters Direct, The Football Supporters’ Federation and the Peterborough Council for Voluntary Service. Sponsored by ‘CHARTERS’ and ‘OAKHAM ALES’ NEWSLETTER No 41 September 2014 Notification of Annual General Meeting and Board Member Nominations 2014 / 2015 - Posh Players Profiles What makes P.U.F.C. a Community Club? Pete’s ‘Memory’ Lane, Posh v Notts Forest! Visit our website: www.theposhtrust.co.uk E-Mail: [email protected] Registered as a Society under the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act 2014. Registration No. 29533R with the Financial Conduct Authority. THE POSH SUPPORTERS’ TRUST Chairman Barry Bennett, Secretary John Henson, Treasurer Geoff Callen Directors : Ray Cole, Keith Jennings, Walter Moore. John Lawrence. Ken Storey. Patron Tommy Robson. Consultant Peter Lloyd. The Posh Supporters’ Trust, is a democratic not-for-profit organisation of supporters, committed to strengthening the voice of supporters in the decision-making process at Peterborough United Football Club. We seek to improve the links between the club and the community it serves, and help the club to grow to the highest level. Our Mission : To bring Peterborough United Football Club, Posh fans and the local community closer together. To help disadvantaged and deserving fans to go to a match for free under the "Smile Ticket" scheme. To help the football club by increasing the Posh fan base through our "New Posh Fans Initiative." To support football related activities locally through sponsorship and donations whenever possible. To have a substantial membership in order to represent the views of fans at meetings with the football club and to promote their interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Utd Given Permission to Trial Safe Standing at Old Trafford
    12 Thursday, April 30, 2020 Sports Manchester Utd given permission to trial safe standing at Old Trafford AFP LONDON Resuming football season MANCHESTER United have been granted permission to ‘definitely possible’, claims install 1,500 safe-standing seats for use in a trial when UEFA medical committee Old Trafford is opened again to supporters. AFP The use of barrier seating LAUSANNE has been approved following a change in regulations and a UEFA’s medical committee All football organisations feasibility study carried out by believes restarting seasons which are planning the the club. suspended because of the restart of their competi- Fans are not expected to be coronavirus pandemic “is tions will produce permitted to attend matches definitely possible”, just as comprehensive protocols... for at least a number of months several European countries with English football indefinite- are ruling out attempts to ensuring that the health of ly suspended due to the corona- return to action. those involved in the virus outbreak. “All football organisations games is protected and Even when matches do re- which are planning the restart the integrity of public turn, they will likely take place of their competitions will policy is preserved. behind closed doors for the for- produce comprehensive proto- seeable future. cols... ensuring that the health -- UEFA’s medical committee However, United insist of those involved in the games chairman, Tim Meyer, in a work can be carried out on is protected and the integrity statement the project whilst respecting of public policy is preserved,” social distancing guidelines said UEFA’s medical commit- to ensure it is ready for when tee chairman, Tim Meyer, in a possible, avoid playing com- fans can return.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom for the Terraces 2013 (PDF)
    freedomfreedom forfor thethe terracesterraces 20132012 34 COUNTRIES | 14 QUESTIONS Publisher: ProFans Sandra Schwedler Postfach 028863 10131 Berlin [email protected] www.profans.de A project of ProFans in collaboration with WELKOM IN AMSTERDAM! Another year passed by, the 6th European Football Fans’ Congress takes part in Amsterdam this weekend and meanwhile for seven years we develop the project “Freedom for the terraces”. Originally started as a part of an exhibition 2006 in Hamburg, the project became much more by now. It’s still kind of an exhibition – at least every year at the Football Fans’ Congress – but it’s also published as reader and actually it’s a really big research organised and developed by football supporters. And it’s still growing. This year we’re happy to announce that supporters of 34 countries took part and answered 14 questions about fans’ paraphernalia, police repression, ticket prices, pyrotechnics and much more. “Freedom of the terraces” is a project of ProFans in association with FSE. ProFans is a nationwide supporters’ organisation in Germany, dedicated in the fight of supporter’s rights. Actually ProFans and FSE just provide an organisational framework, but work is done by many other people around Europe resp. the world. We have to say that you did a fantastic work this year again. So, thank you very much, for answering our questions, connecting people or just being supportive! The result is magnificent! In case of any question or if you miss a country or you would like to add something, don’t hesitate to contact us via e-mail: [email protected] And now: Enjoy! Dan / Prague & Sandra / Hamburg ProFans, July 2013 – 1 – ARGENTINA s ► Capital: Buenos Aires ► Language: Spanish ► No.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing for the Public Petitions Committee
    Briefing for the Public Petitions Committee Petition Number: PE1248 Main Petitioner: Mr Stephen Taylor on behalf of the Pars Supporters Trust Subject: Calls on the Parliament to ask the Scottish Government to encourage the football authorities in Scotland to allow professional clubs to have the option of re-introducing safe standing areas at the country’s top class football grounds. Background The introduction of all seated football stadia was a consequence of the findings of the 1989 report by Lord Taylor into the ‘Hillsborough Stadium Disaster’. The findings of the report applied to football stadia in England and Wales. Lord Taylor recommended all seated stadia for football matches in the following terms: “There is no panacea which will achieve total safety and cure all problems of behaviour and crowd control. But I am satisfied that seating does more to achieve those objectives than any other single measure” (Football Supporters’ Federation, 2007, p.5). The UK Government accepted Lord Taylor’s recommendation and implemented it through the Football Spectators Act (1989). Section 11 of the Act enables Ministers to require conditions in licences (to hold football matches) regarding the seating of spectators. At present, football matches in the Premiership and the Championship (the top two leagues in England and Wales) are required to be held in all seated stadia. The provisions of the 1989 Act do not apply to Scotland. In Scotland, membership of the Scottish Premier League (SPL) requires that: “…non-seated areas of a ground may not be utilised in a match in the Scottish Premier League” (SPL, 2008, p.3).
    [Show full text]
  • SBA17-Winners Brochure
    THE STADIUM BUSINESS AWARDS 2017 Recognising leadership, innovation & achievement in the delivery, operation and management of sports facilities globally THE WINNERS 22 June 2017 • Croke Park • Dublin VENUE OF THE YEAR For the world’s best stadium, arena or sports venue. From the small local club venue to the mega-capacity national sports stadium which deserves recognition for its outstanding performance over the past 12 months ...and the award goes to... MetLife Stadium, USA A Word from the Judges "The scale and complexity of the operation at MetLife Stadium is surely worthy of an award in any year... But 2016 was exceptional, as the stadium hosted its busiest season since opening in 2010: 61 major events and more than three million guests – with nine major events in the month of August alone. The stats are simply unassailable. MetLife Stadium is this year’s Venue of the Year winner." The Finalists •Golden 1 Center, USA •Liverpool FC’s Anfield, UK •MetLife Stadium, USA •Vodafone Arena, Turkey •Stade Pierre-Mauroy, France •U.S. Bank Stadium, USA •Parc Olympique Lyonnais, France EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR For the sports venue leader, pioneer or visionary that has over-delivered in the past 12 months ...and the award goes to... Vivek Ranadivé Owner & Chairman, Sacramento Kings, USA A Word from the Judges "In a sports world dominated by wealthy and distant owners, Vivek has not let his own success obscure the importance of fans and community. He views the Sacramento Kings as a platform which people look to as community leaders, activists and role models. Under his leadership in Sacramento, he opened the most technologically advanced and sustainable arena in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WATNEY CUP' [Season 1973-74]
    Please Take Care of our Environment Recycle this Newsletter if no longer required Patron :- Tommy Robson Members of Supporters Direct, The Football Supporters’ Federation and Peterborough Council for Voluntary Service. Sponsored by ‘CHARTERS’ and ‘OAKHAM ALES’ NEWSLETTER No 39 August 2013 Notification of our 11th Annual General Meeting and Board Member Nominations. The Peterborough United Squad for 2013/14 At Last! Stadium Development is GO! Pete’s ‘Memory’ Lane, 1973 / 74 season. A National Trophy for Peterborough United ‘Best Away Day’ Award 2012/13 Visit our website: www.theposhtrust.co.uk E-Mail: [email protected] THE POSH SUPPORTERS’ TRUST Registered in England and Wales with the Financial Services Authority as an Industrial & Provident Society. Registration number: 29533R. Patron Tommy Robson Chairman Barry Bennett, Vice-Chair Paul Froggitt, Secretary John Henson, Treasurer Geoff Callen Directors : Ray Cole, Tony Griffin, Keith Jennings, Paul Little, Walter Moore. John Lawrence. Consultant Peter Lloyd. The Posh Supporters’ Trust, is a democratic not-for-profit organisation of supporters, committed to strengthening the voice of supporters in the decision-making process at Peterborough United Football Club. We seek to improve the links between the club and the community it serves, and help the club to grow to the highest level. Our Mission : To bring Peterborough United Football Club, Posh fans and the local community closer together. To help disadvantaged and deserving fans to go to a match for free under the "Smile Ticket" scheme. To help the football club by increasing the Posh fan base through our "New Posh Fans Initiative." To support football related activities locally through sponsorship and donations whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing at Football
    By John Woodhouse 31 August 2021 Standing at football Summary 1 The current position 2 Time for change? commonslibrary.parliament.uk Number 03937 Standing at football Image Credits Attributed to: Fulham FC v Bolton Wanderers, 2002 by mightymightymatze. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. Disclaimer The Commons Library does not intend the information in our research publications and briefings to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. We have published it to support the work of MPs. You should not rely upon it as legal or professional advice, or as a substitute for it. We do not accept any liability whatsoever for any errors, omissions or misstatements contained herein. You should consult a suitably qualified professional if you require specific advice or information. Read our briefing ‘Legal help: where to go and how to pay’ for further information about sources of legal advice and help. This information is provided subject to the conditions of the Open Parliament Licence. Feedback Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in these publicly available briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated to reflect subsequent changes. If you have any comments on our briefings please email [email protected]. Please note that authors are not always able to engage in discussions with members of the public who express opinions about the content of our research, although we will carefully consider and correct any factual errors. You can read our feedback and complaints policy and our editorial policy at commonslibrary.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Kicking Through the Wall: Football, Division, and Entanglement In
    Kicking Through the Wall: Football, Division, and Entanglement in Postwar Berlin By Emmanuel Hogg, BA (Hons), MA A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Carleton University Ottawa, ON © 2016, Emmanuel Hogg Abstract Seldom is the German capital referred to as a “Fußballstadt” (“football-city”). When Berlin and football are mentioned together, themes of corruption, hooliganism, the Stasi, and scandal dominate. And yet, Berlin holds a rich footballing history that dates back to the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and has long played an important role in the lives of Berliners as spaces for sociability. In the postwar period, two divergent states emerged, each with their own competing structures of football. Whereas in the Federal Republic football remained an autonomous but not apolitical space, it was explicitly politicized in East Germany. As an important form of “soft power” during the Cold War, the people’s game reveals the extent to which the Iron Curtain was much more porous and elastic than the imagery of the Berlin Wall suggests. Rather than view football as “war without the fighting”, a microcosm that interprets the German and Cold War past as simplistic, reductive, and dichotomous, this dissertation analyzes the sport’s inherent dynamism that presented Berliners on both sides of the Wall with unique spaces for social interaction. Although both German states tried to use the sport to assert their own interests, this dissertation argues that football simultaneously provided fans with a relatively free space authorities could not effectively control, opening the opportunity for German- German interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing at Football a Rapid Evidence Assessment Dr Jo Welford Alex Beard Andrew Corley Dr Guy Birkin Nariah Francis Hayley Lamb
    Standing at Football A Rapid Evidence Assessment Dr Jo Welford Alex Beard Andrew Corley Dr Guy Birkin Nariah Francis Hayley Lamb Acknowledgements: We would like to thank individuals from the Premier League, English Football League, UK Football Policing Unit, Football Supporters’ Federation, Sports Grounds Safety Authority, The Football Association, Level Playing Field, Celtic FC, West Bromwich Albion FC and Oxford United FC who gave up their time to discuss this evidence review with us, along with Jon Darch and Mark Turner. Thanks also go to those who submitted evidence to be considered for this review, including the organisations and clubs acknowledged above as well as numerous academics and experts working in the sector. For more information about this report please contact: Dr Jo Welford [email protected] CFE Research Phoenix Yard Upper Brown Street Leicester LE1 5TE 0116 229 3300 www.cfe.org.uk © CFE 2019 Established in 1997, CFE is an independent not-for- profit company specialising in the provision of research and evaluation services in the fields of education, wellbeing and the economy. Contents Contents ................................................................................................................... 3 Executive summary ................................................................................................. 4 This report .......................................................................................................... 7 01. Introduction ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A 2020 Round-Up
    NEWSLETTER A 2020 Round-Up A word from our CEO, Duncan Drasdo Some of you may remember the occasion, back in 1992, when the Queen famously described the preceding 12 months as an annus horribilis. It seems that 2020 looked back on its ‘92 forefather, rolled up its sleeves and said “Hold my beer”. This is a year that few will be sorry to see behind us. It’s hard to imagine how we’d have reacted to a prediction that 2020 would see the season suspended and then games resume behind closed doors with fans excluded from stadia. Worse still Liverpool seized the chance to break a 30-year drought with their first league title* since 1990. (*Historians with Red Mancunian sympathies will delight in applying an asterisk to this entry in the record books). More seriously though, the impact of Covid on people’s lives has been immense - millions have been impacted financially and many thousands have died. Sadly, when we finally do return, there will be numerous seats at Old Trafford permanently deprived of their previous occupants. That is quite a sobering thought. It’s no exaggeration to say that Covid has dominated everything and that includes MUST’s own activities - whether they be discussions with the Club, representing our supporters, or working to support our local community through our Foodbank initiative. It’s often said that adversity brings out the best in people and that’s certainly been true of so many in this pandemic. Manchester United itself has been no exception in that respect with tremendous support for the local community, and indeed our own Foodbank Appeal with a £50,000 donation the eye- catching headline, but many more activities going on behind the scenes.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC PETITION NO. PE1248 Should You Wish to Submit a Public
    (For official use only) PUBLIC PETITION NO. PE1248 Should you wish to submit a public petition for consideration by the Public Petitions Committee please refer to the guidance leaflet How to submit a public petition and the Guidance Notes at the back of this form. 1. NAME OF PRINCIPAL PETITIONER (If applicable, please specify the name of the organisation on whose behalf the petition is raised) Stephen A Taylor on behalf of Pars Supporters Trust (Dunfermline Athletic Supporters Society Ltd) 2. PETITION TITLE Safe standing areas at football stadia 3. PETITION TEXT Calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to re- introduce safe standing areas at Scottish Premier League football stadia to give professional clubs the option to have seated or standing areas at their football grounds. 4. ACTION TAKEN TO RESOLVE ISSUES OF CONCERN BEFORE SUBMITTING THE PETITION There has been no concerted campaign by football supporters throughout Scotland, as yet, to lobby politicians to bring back standing as this has been seen as a “football” matter under the control of the football authorities. In England the football supporters organisation, Federation of Football Supporters, does have a campaign not yet replicated in Scotland but there is no doubt tremendous sympathy with the English campaign evidenced through supporters websites and plainly their actions on occasions at football grounds. Our own national organisation, Supporters Direct, has left this matter to their colleagues in the FFS to promote. Mid Scotland and Fife MSP Mr John Park is supporting us in lodging the petition and has also provided very helpful background legislative concerns on this subject 5.
    [Show full text]