DOCSLIB.ORG

The Type Material of Families Lophopidae, Nogodinidae and Ricaniidae (Hemiptera-Auchenorrhyncha) in the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, Warsaw

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Type Material of Families Lophopidae, Nogodinidae and Ricaniidae (Hemiptera-Auchenorrhyncha) in the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, Warsaw Bulletin of the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, supplement to Annales Zoologici Warszawa 1999, No 2: 63-68 The Type Material of Families Lophopidae, Nogodinidae and Ricaniidae (Hemiptera-Auchenorrhyncha) in the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, Warsaw A dam Stroiński Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Polska e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The type specimens of Hemiptera-Auchenorrhyncha of the family Lophopidae, Nogodinidae, and Ricaniidae, preserved in the Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw, are listed. Key words. Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Lophopidae, Nogodinidae, Ricaniidae, type specimens. I ntroduction in print: “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa [accession The following list includes type specimens of 40 No]” or “Inst. Zool. PAN Warszawa [accession No]”, the second one is red with the following inscription in nominal species, subspecies and varieties of family print: “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa Typus n. Lophopidae, Nogodinidae, and Ricaniidae preserved [museum type number] [original name, author and in the Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences (MZPW) in Warsaw. year] [kind of the type]”. All the data published in the list are being simulta­ The family Lophopidae is represented by 4 nomi­ neously recorded in a computer data base in the nal species described by SCHMIDT and FENNAH. The Zoological Museum, and potential borrowers of the family Nogodinidae is represented by 10 nominal species and 2 nominal varieties described by specimens may refer both to the name or to the num­ ber of particular specimen they want to borrow for SCHMIDT. The family Ricaniidae is represented by 21 nominal species and 3 nominal varieties described by study. S c h m id t , Ja c o b i and S t Al . The list is arranged alphabetically by family, L i s t o f S p e c i m e n s genera and species according to the names in original descriptions. The species name is followed by the Lophopidae author and bibliographic citation. The contents of Brixioides africanus SCHMIDT, 1912: 358 individual labels are limited by quotation marks and separated by the comma. SYNTYPE female (No. 2431) labels: “Musee du The specimens included in the list are individually Congo Beige Busira 12.10.05 Waelbroeck”, numbered and labelled for an inventory purposes. All “Type”, “Brixoides africanus Schmidt o" Edm. specimens have two museum registration labels Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum attached. One of them is white and bear the inscription Warszawa 12/45”. http://rcin.org.pl 64 • A. Stroiński Note: Wings on slide labelled: “Brixioides africanus Serida gorgopis F e n n a h , 1978: 274 Schmidt Busira Type! cT Deckfltigel x Fliigel”; apex of abdomen mounted on slide labelled: HOLOTYPE male (No. 2440) labels: “Viet-nam, “Brixioides africanus Schmidt Busira Type! <f 6.6.1966 Cuo-phuóng prov. Ninh Binh leg. R. Hinterleibsende zerlegt”. Bielawski 9 B. Pisarski /7809/”, “Inst. Zool. SYNTYPE female (No. 2432) labels: “Kamerun P.A.N. Warszawa 52/66”, “Holotype”, “Serida Barombi Conradt”, “Type”, “Brixiodes africanus gorgopsis R.G. Fennah”. Schmidt 9 Edm. Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Note: Genitalia in vial of glycerin on pin Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. PARATYPE female (No. 2441) labels: “Viet-nam, Note: Apex of abdomen mounted on slide labelled: Tam Dao 70 km N Hanoi 24-26 VI 1962 A. “Brixioides africanus Schmidt Kamerun Type! 9 Warchalowski leg. /7304/”, “Inst. Zool. P.A.N. Hinterleibsende”. Warszawa 59/62”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2433) labels: “Kamerun Barombi Conradt”, “Co=Typus”, “Brixioides Nogodinidae africanus Schmidt ? Edm. Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Aphanophrys Kdstneri SC H M ID T , 1930: 119 SYNTYPE male (No. 2434) labels: “Kamerun Hinter­ land Jaunde-Stat 6.5.97 Zenker S.”, “Co=Typus”, HOLOTYPE female (No. 2468) labels: “Fly-river, N. “Brixioides africanus Schmidt cf Edm. Schmidt G. 22.VII — 6. VIII ’28 Jeswiet”, “Typus”, determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa “Aphanophrys Kastneri Schmidt 9 Edm. Schmidt 12/45”. determ. 1930”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa SYNTYPE female (No. 2435) labels: “Togo 12/45”. Bismarckburg Conradt S.”, “Co=Typus”, “Brixio­ ides africanus Schmidt 9 Edm. Schmidt determ. Gaetulia vittifrons SC H M ID T , 1912: 89 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. SYNTYPE male (No. 2453) labels: “Costa Rica H. Jugoda heterogena S C H M ID T , 1926: 30 Schmidt S.”, “Type”, “Gaetulia vittifrons Schmidt cf Edm. Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. SYNTYPE male (No. 2436) labels: “Key”, “Typus”, Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. “Jugoda heterogena Schmidt <f Edm. Schmidt SYNTYPE female (No. 2454) labels: “Costa Rica H. determ. 1926”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa Schmidt S.”, “Type”, “Gaetulia vittifrons Schmidt 12/45”. 9 Edm. Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. SYNTYPE female (No. 2437) labels: “Key”, “Typus”, Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. “Jugoda heterogena Schmidt 9 Edm. Schmidt SYNTYPE female (No. 2455) labels: “Costa Rica H. determ. 1926”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa Schmidt S.”, “Co=Typus”, “Gaetulia vittifrons 12/45”. Schmidt 9 Edm. Schmidt; determ. 1912”, “Mus. SYNTYPE (No. 2438) labels: “Key”, “Co=Typus”, Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. “Jugoda heterogena Schmidt Edm. Schmidt determ. 1926”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Indogaetulia insular is SC H M ID T , 1919: 173 Note: Abdomen is missing. SYNTYPES females (No. 2457-2461) labels: “Dohrn Sumatra Soekaranda”, “Type”, “Indogaetulia Lophops intermedia SC H M ID T , 1926: 246 insularis Schmidt 9 Edm. Schmidt determ. 1919”, HOLOTYPE female (No. 2439) labels: “Buru 1922 “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Station 3/4 29-1 800 M leg. L. J. Toxopeus”, “E- SYNTYPE female (No. 2462) labels: “Soekaranda Schmidt”, “Typus”, “Lophops intermedia Schmidt Januar 1894 Dohrn”, “Type”, “Indogaetulia insula­ 9 Edm. Schmidt determ. 1925”, “Mus. Zool. ris Schmidt 9 Edm. Schmidt determ. 1919”, “Mus. Polonicum; Warszawa 12/45”. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Lophopidae, Nogodinidae and Ricaniidae • 65 Mindura fraterna SC H M ID T , 1925: 35 ? Edm. Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. SYNTYPE male (No. 2463) labels: “Dohrn Sumatra Soekaranda”, “Typus”, “Mindura fraterna Schmidt Sassula apicalis SC H M ID T , 1905: 189 <? Edm. Schmidt determ. 1925”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. SYNTYPE male (No. 2443) labels: “Santa Inez SYNTYPE female (No. 2464) labels: “Dohrn Sumatra (Ecuad.) R. Haensch S.”, “Type”, “Orthothyreus Soekaranda”, “Typus”, “Mindura fraterna Schmidt apicalis Schmidt <f determ. 1918”, “Mus. Zool. ? Edm. Schmidt determ. 1925”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2443) labels: “Santa Inez (Ecuad.) R. Haensch S.”, “Type”, “Orthothyreus Mindura sinuatifrons SC H M ID T , 1926: 248 apicalis Schmidt ? determ. 1918”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. SYNTYPE male (No. 2465) labels: “Buru 1921 Station I VIII leg. L. J. Toxopeus”, “Typus”, Varciella apicalis SC H M ID T , 1931: 75 “Mindura sinuatifrons Schmidt cf Edm. Schmidt determ. 1925”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa SYNTYPE male (No. 2469) labels: “N. Guinea Dilo”, 12/45”. “E. Schmidt”, “Typus”, “Varciella apicalis SYNTYPE female (No. 2466) labels: “Buru 1921 Schmidt <? Edm. Schmidt determ. 1929”, “Mus. Station I 29 X leg. L. J. Toxopeus”, “Typus”, Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. “Mindura sinuatifrons Schmidt ? Edm. Schmidt SYNTYPE female (No. 2470) labels: “N. Guinea mer. determ. 1925”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa Kapakapa”, “E. Schmidt”, “Typus”, “Varciella 12/45”. apicalis Schmidt ? Edm. Schmidt determ. 1929”, SYNTYPE female (No. 2467) labels: “Burn 1921 “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Station I 12 XII leg. L. J. Toxopeus”, “Typus”, “Mindura sinuatifrons Schmidt ? Edm. Schmidt Vutinasexmaculata var. bimaculata SC H M ID T, 1912: determ. 1925”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 85 12/45”. SYNTYPES males (No. 2445-2447) labels: “Bolivien Prov. SaraSteinbach S.”, “Type”, “V. sexmaculata Nogodina Fruhstorferi SC H M ID T , 1905: 186 var. bimaculata Schmidt a" Edm. Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. HOLOTYPE male (No. 2442) labels: “Java”, “Type”, SYNTYPE female (No. 2448) labels: “Bolivien Prov. “Probletomus Fruhstorferi Schmidt d" Edm. Sara Steinbach S.”, “Type”, “V. sexmaculata var. Schmidt determ. 1919”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum bimaculata Schmidt ? Edm. Schmidt determ. Warszawa 12/45”. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Paravarcia deceptrix SC H M ID T , 1919: 150 Vutina sexmaculata var. quadrimaculata SCHMIDT, 1912: 85 HOLOTYPE male (No. 2456) labels: “Tonkin Than- Moi Juni-Juli H. Fruhstorfer”, “Type”, “Paravarcia SYNTYPE male (No. 2449) labels: “Bolivien”, deceptrix Schmidt Edm. Schmidt determ. 1919”, “Type”, “V. sexmaculata var. 4-maculata Schmidt “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. o' Edm. Schmidt determ. 1912”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Privesomorphus sinuatifrons S c h m i d t , 1912: 87 SYNTYPES males (No. 2450 and 2451) labels: “Bolivien Prov. Sara Steinbach S.”, “Type”, “V. SYNTYPE female (No. 2452) labels: “Ost-Africa sexmaculata var. 4-maculata Schmidt o' Edm. Muoa Bez. Tanga Fischer S.”, “Type”, “E. Schmidt determ. 1912” , “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Schmidt”, “Privesomorphus sinuatifrons Schmidt Warszawa 12/45”. http://rcin.org.pl 66 • A. Stroiński Ricaniidae determ. 1911”, “Mus. Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. Acroprivesa suturalis SCHMIDT, 1912: 78 SYNTYPES females (No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve
    Some Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Some by Aniruddha Dhamorikar Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Aniruddha Dhamorikar 1 2 Study of some Insect orders (Insecta) and Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Kanha Tiger Reserve by The Corbett Foundation Project investigator Aniruddha Dhamorikar Expert advisors Kedar Gore Dr Amol Patwardhan Dr Ashish Tiple Declaration This report is submitted in the fulfillment of the project initiated by The Corbett Foundation under the permission received from the PCCF (Wildlife), Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, communication code क्रम 車क/ तकनीकी-I / 386 dated January 20, 2014. Kanha Office Admin office Village Baherakhar, P.O. Nikkum 81-88, Atlanta, 8th Floor, 209, Dist Balaghat, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Madhya Pradesh 481116 Maharashtra 400021 Tel.: +91 7636290300 Tel.: +91 22 614666400 [email protected] www.corbettfoundation.org 3 Some Insects and Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve by Aniruddha Dhamorikar © The Corbett Foundation. 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used, reproduced, or transmitted in any form (electronic and in print) for commercial purposes. This book is meant for educational purposes only, and can be reproduced or transmitted electronically or in print with due credit to the author and the publisher. All images are © Aniruddha Dhamorikar unless otherwise mentioned. Image credits (used under Creative Commons): Amol Patwardhan: Mottled emigrant (plate 1.l) Dinesh Valke: Whirligig beetle (plate 10.h) Jeffrey W. Lotz: Kerria lacca (plate 14.o) Piotr Naskrecki, Bud bug (plate 17.e) Beatriz Moisset: Sweat bee (plate 26.h) Lindsay Condon: Mole cricket (plate 28.l) Ashish Tiple: Common hooktail (plate 29.d) Ashish Tiple: Common clubtail (plate 29.e) Aleksandr: Lacewing larva (plate 34.c) Jeff Holman: Flea (plate 35.j) Kosta Mumcuoglu: Louse (plate 35.m) Erturac: Flea (plate 35.n) Cover: Amyciaea forticeps preying on Oecophylla smargdina, with a kleptoparasitic Phorid fly sharing in the meal.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera: first Record for an Australian Lophopid (Hemiptera, Lophopidae)
    Australian Journal of Entomology (2007) 46, 129–132 Historical use of substrate-borne acoustic production within the Hemiptera: first record for an Australian Lophopid (Hemiptera, Lophopidae) Adeline Soulier-Perkins,1* Jérôme Sueur2 and Hannelore Hoch3 1Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, USM 601 MNHN & UMR 5202 CNRS, Case Postale 50, 45, Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France. 2NAMC-CNRS UMR 8620, Bât. 446, Université Paris XI, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France. 3Museum für Naturkunde, Institut für Systematische Zoologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Invalidenstr. 43, D- 10115 Berlin, Germany. Abstract Here the first record of communication through substrate-borne vibrations for the Lophopidae family is reported. The signals from Magia subocellata that the authors recorded were short calls with a decreasing frequency modulation. Acoustic vibrations have been observed for other families within the Hemiptera and a scenario concerning the historical use of vibrational communication within the Hemiptera is tested using a phylogenetic inference. The most parsimonious hypothesis suggests that substrate-borne communication is ancestral for the hemipteran order and highlights the groups for which future acoustic research should be undertaken. Key words Cicadomorpha, Coleorrhyncha, evolutionary scenario, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha, substrate vibration. INTRODUCTION Lophopidae migrating into America via the Bering land bridge. Some other ancestors of the extant groups moved onto Many animals have been recently recognised for their ability newly emerging land in the Pacific, expanding their distribu- to communicate through substrate-borne vibrations (Hill tion as far east as the Samoan Islands, and as far south as 2001). While elephants produce vibrations transmitted by the Australia (Soulier-Perkins 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring and Reporting Taxonomic Data, Training Students in Taxonomy
    Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 3: e37730 doi: 10.3897/biss.3.37730 Conference Abstract Visualisation of Taxonomic Knowledge: Exploring and reporting taxonomic data, training students in taxonomy Thierry Bourgoin‡, Régine Vignes Lebbe§, Nicolas Bailly | ‡ Museum national Histoire naturelle, UMR 7205 MNHN-CNRS-Sorbonne Université-EPHE, Paris, France § Sorbonne Université, MNHN, CNRS, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Institut Systématique Évolution Biodiversité, ISYEB, Paris, France | University of British Columbia / Beaty Biodiversity Museum, Vancouver, Canada Corresponding author: Thierry Bourgoin ([email protected]) Received: 27 Jun 2019 | Published: 02 Jul 2019 Citation: Bourgoin T, Vignes Lebbe R, Bailly N (2019) Visualisation of Taxonomic Knowledge: Exploring and reporting taxonomic data, training students in taxonomy. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 3: e37730. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.37730 Abstract Taxon concepts are complex, dynamic representations of the real world that are labelled with scientific names designating them. While names, taxa and classifications should be managed separately in databases (Bourgoin et al. 2019, Gallut et al. 2005), students may have difficulty comprehending the dynamic nature of the link between the three entities because taxa circumscriptions are complex to apprehend through textual representation and because names are independently ruled by nomenclatural codes. Exploring, reporting and training users about taxonomic knowledge are complex challenges that could be alleviated through development of efficient visualization tools. We propose here a tool that generates a graphical representation visualizing the successive concepts of a taxon accepted as valid with its different names and positions in classifications, including its synonyms, homonyms, chresonyms, and other related taxonomic and nomenclatural issues during its lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the External Morphology and Functions of Labial Tip Sensilla in Semiaquatic Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 111(2): 275–297, 2014 doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.033 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) A comparison of the external morphology and functions of labial tip sensilla in semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) 1 2 JOLANTA BROŻeK and HERBERT ZeTTeL 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, PL 40-007 Katowice, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum, entomological Department, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Heteroptera, Gerromorpha, labial tip sensilla, pattern, morphology, function, apomorphic characters Abstract. The present study provides new data on the morphology and distribution of the labial tip sensilla of 41 species of 20 gerro- morphan (sub)families (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) obtained using a scanning electron microscope. There are eleven morphologically distinct types of sensilla on the tip of the labium: four types of basiconic uniporous sensilla, two types of plate sensilla, one type of peg uniporous sensilla, peg-in-pit sensilla, dome-shaped sensilla, placoid multiporous sensilla and elongated placoid multiporous sub- apical sensilla. Based on their external structure, it is likely that these sensilla are thermo-hygrosensitive, chemosensitive and mechano- chemosensitive. There are three different designs of sensilla in the Gerromorpha: the basic design occurs in Mesoveliidae and Hebridae; the intermediate one is typical of Hydrometridae and Hermatobatidae, and the most specialized design in Macroveliidae, Veliidae and Gerridae. No new synapomorphies for Gerromorpha were identified in terms of the labial tip sensilla, multi-peg structures and shape of the labial tip, but eleven new diagnostic characters are recorded for clades currently recognized in this infraorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Example Insect Natural History Data
    Example Insect Natural History Data These data were assembled by participants of a workshop held at the University of Florida from May 30 to June 1 of 2018. The data cover all five major insect orders (Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera) and represent most of the various kinds of natural history information found on insect specimen labels. The data also include representative natural history information from literature sources and online databases. For more information about how these data were assembled and why, see Stucky et al. (2019) __________. Except for works in the public domain, data use licenses are as specified by the original data owners. Coleoptera Example 1 Taxonomy: Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Acmaeodera sp. Record type: database Life stage(s): adult Source: iNaturalist Record URL: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/12840335 Comments and relevant content: "Feeding on wildflowers in an open meadow in the midlands of South Carolina." Example 2 Taxonomy: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae Record type: literature Source: Paro et al. (2011) Relevant text: "Table 1. Association between girdled and available host-plants (listed alphabetically) and Onciderini beetles in Serra do Japi from 2002 to 2006." The table gives the percentages of each plant species that were girdled along with associated beetle species. Example 3 Taxonomy: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Rhaesus serricollis Record type: literature Source: Sama et al. (2010) Relevant text: "Host plants: Polyphagous on deciduous trees like Platanus (Platanaceae), Ficus
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Power Project Invertebrates Scoping Level
    Biomass Power Project Invertebrates Scoping level John Irish 21 June 2017 Biodata Consultancy cc P.O. Box 30061, Windhoek, Namibia [email protected] 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................3 2 Approach to study..............................................................................................................3 2.1 Terms of reference..........................................................................................................3 2.2 Methodology...................................................................................................................3 2.2.1 Literature survey..........................................................................................................3 2.2.2 Site visits......................................................................................................................5 3 Limitations and Assumptions.............................................................................................5 4 Legislative context..............................................................................................................6 4.1 Applicable laws and policies...........................................................................................6 5 Results...............................................................................................................................7 5.1 Raw diversity...................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Fulgoraecia (= Epiricania) Melanoleuca
    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Short Communication Occurrence of Fulgoraecia (= Epiricania) melanoleuca (Lepidoptera: Epipyropidae) as a parasitoid of sugarcane lophopid planthopper Pyrilla perpusilla in Tamil Nadu (India) with brief notes on its life stages H. Sankararaman, G. Naveenadevi & S. Manickavasagam 26 May 2020 | Vol. 12 | No. 8 | Pages: 15927–15931 DOI: 10.11609/jot.5033.12.8.15927-15931 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher & Host ners are not responsible for the accuracy of the politcal boundaries shown in the maps by the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPERS PRESENTED DURING 1922. the Fourth Volume
    205 PAPERS PRESENTED DURING 1922. On the Classification of the Fulgoroidea (Homoptera). BY F, MUIR. (Presented at the meeting of April 6, 1922.) Introduction. Stal has been justly styled the Father of Hemipterology, and the fourth volume of his Hemiptera Africana (1866) is still the foundation of the classification of Homoptera. Although the number of genera has increased greatly since then, yet the char acters he employed in his classification of the fulgorids hold good for most cases today. The trouble has been that workers have disregarded his characters and placed genera in families where they should not be, and so they have broken down the family characters. A contemporary of Stal's, F. X. Fieber, also laid us under a deep debt by his work. Although he based his work mainly on European species, it holds good today. In many ways he was more modern than Stal, especially in his specific work. His recognition of the value of the male genitalia for specific dis tinction placed the Delphacidae of Europe in a condition that no other method could have done. If we follow his lead and extend his work it will be to the advantage of Homopterology. Another worker to whom we owe a debt of gratitude for the elucidation of the relationship of the families of Auchenorhyn- chous Homoptera is H. J. Hansen. His work1 has shown the morphological distinctions between the different groups and has placed these divisions on a safe foundation. That I do not agree with him, in regarding the fulgorids as consisting of a single family, in no way implies that I do not appreciate or recognize his good work.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Hemiptera)
    Zoomorphology DOI 10.1007/s00435-012-0174-z ORIGINAL PAPER Morphology and distribution of the external labial sensilla in Fulgoromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera) Jolanta Brozek_ • Thierry Bourgoin Received: 24 May 2012 / Revised: 24 August 2012 / Accepted: 30 August 2012 Ó The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The present paper describes the sensory struc- sensilla in some other Hemiptera. This represents a more tures on the apical segment of the labium in fifteen ful- recently evolved function for the planthopper labium. goromorphan families (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha), using Finally, further lines of study are suggested for future work the scanning electron microscope. Thirteen morphologi- on the phylogeny of the group based on the studied cally distinct types of sensilla are identified: five types of characters. multiporous sensilla, four types of uniporous sensilla and four types of nonporous sensilla. Three subapical sensory Keywords Fulgoromorpha Á Apex labium Á Labial organ types are also recognized, formed from one to sev- sensilla distribution Á Phylogeny Á Gustatory function Á eral sensilla, each characteristic of a family group. Sensilla Exaptation chaetica (mechanoreceptive sensilla) fall into three cate- gories dependent on length and are numerous and evenly distributed on the surface of the labium except where they Introduction occur on specialized sensory fields. The planthopper mor- phological ground plan is represented by two apical pair of Insect sensilla consist of an exocuticular outer structure by sensory fields (dorsal and ventral) on which 11 dorsal pairs or through which stimuli are conveyed to one or more of sensilla (10 peg-like pairs ? 1 specialized pair dome or sensory cell processes within the sensilla.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Eocene of the Central Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau
    Foss. Rec., 24, 263–274, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-24-263-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The first Fulgoridae (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha) from the Eocene of the central Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau Xiao-Ting Xu1,2, Wei-Yu-Dong Deng1,2, Zhe-Kun Zhou1,2, Torsten Wappler3, and Tao Su1,2 1CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany Correspondence: Torsten Wappler ([email protected]) and Tao Su ([email protected]) Received: 12 December 2020 – Revised: 5 July 2021 – Accepted: 6 July 2021 – Published: 17 August 2021 Abstract. The Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP) played a cru- 1 Introduction cial role in shaping the biodiversity in Asia during the Ceno- zoic. However, fossil records attributed to insects are still scarce from the QTP, which limits our understanding on The Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP) is the highest and the evolution of biodiversity in this large region. Fulgori- one of the largest plateaus on Earth (Yao et al., 2017). dae (lanternfly) is a group of large planthopper in body size, With its unique and complex interactions of atmospheric, which is found primarily in tropical regions. The majority cryospheric, hydrological, geological, and environmental of the Fulgoridae bear brilliant colors and elongated heads. processes, the QTP has significantly influenced the Earth’s The fossil records of Fulgoridae span from the Eocene to biodiversity, monsoonal climate, and water cycles (Harris, Miocene in the Northern Hemisphere, and only a few fossil 2006; Yao et al., 2012; Spicer, 2017; Farnsworth et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Perspectives on the Evolution of Insect Diversity
    FOSSIL PERSPECTIVES ON THE EVOLUTION OF INSECT DIVERSITY Thesis submitted by David B Nicholson For examination for the degree of PhD University of York Department of Biology November 2012 1 Abstract A key contribution of palaeontology has been the elucidation of macroevolutionary patterns and processes through deep time, with fossils providing the only direct temporal evidence of how life has responded to a variety of forces. Thus, palaeontology may provide important information on the extinction crisis facing the biosphere today, and its likely consequences. Hexapods (insects and close relatives) comprise over 50% of described species. Explaining why this group dominates terrestrial biodiversity is a major challenge. In this thesis, I present a new dataset of hexapod fossil family ranges compiled from published literature up to the end of 2009. Between four and five hundred families have been added to the hexapod fossil record since previous compilations were published in the early 1990s. Despite this, the broad pattern of described richness through time depicted remains similar, with described richness increasing steadily through geological history and a shift in dominant taxa after the Palaeozoic. However, after detrending, described richness is not well correlated with the earlier datasets, indicating significant changes in shorter term patterns. Corrections for rock record and sampling effort change some of the patterns seen. The time series produced identify several features of the fossil record of insects as likely artefacts, such as high Carboniferous richness, a Cretaceous plateau, and a late Eocene jump in richness. Other features seem more robust, such as a Permian rise and peak, high turnover at the end of the Permian, and a late-Jurassic rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera): New Phylogenetic Evidence
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Cicadina = Beiträge zur Zikadenkunde Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 12 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hamilton K.G. Andrew Artikel/Article: Making sense of Fulgoroidea (Hemiptera): new phylogenetic evidence. 57-79 Cicadina 12: 57-79 (2011)©Arbeitskreis Zikaden Mitteleuropas e.V. - download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 57 Making sense of Fulgoroidea (Hemiptera): new phylogenetic evidence K.G. Andrew Hamilton1 Abstract: Antennal sensilla in more than 450 genera o f all 21 putative families o f Fulgoroidea provide characters that correlate well with other characters, including those of nymphal wax filaments and adult behaviour. Together, these characters indicate that Issidae, Lophopidae and Tropiduchidae are polyphyletic taxa, and suggest that Achilidae, Caliscelidae, Cixiidae and Dictyopharidae are paraphyletic. Two strongly supported monophyletic lineages comprise six plesiomorphic taxa (Achilidae+ Cixiidae+ Achilixiidae+ Derbidae+ Kinnaridae+ Meenoplidae) and five apomorphic taxa (Eurybrachidae+ Gengidae+ Lophopidae tribes Acarnini+ Colpopterini+ Elasmoscelini). Tetdgometridae share the most highly modified antennal type with Ahomocnemiellinae (of Caliscelidae). Weaker evidence suggests that Trypetomorphini (of Tropiduchidae) together with Augilini (of Lophopidae) is the basal lineage of Delphacidae, that Fulgoridae together with Dictyopharidae and Hiraciini (of Tropiduchidae) form a fifth monophyly, and that the remainder of Fulgoroidea are related to Issidae and to Nogodinidae. The most characteristic antennal sensilla type (known since 1890) is shared by seven putative families (Acanaloniidae, Flatidae, Hypochthonellidae, Ricaniidae, Issidae, Lophopidae and Tropiduchidae). The unexpected relationships of Issidae to various other such families support a 1977 hypothesis by Fennah that derive an “issid” wing type in Mithjmna Stal from that of Nogodinidae.
    [Show full text]