DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham E-Theses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses Glacial Geomorphology of southern Alberta, Canada YOUNG, NATHANIEL,JOSEPH,PETER How to cite: YOUNG, NATHANIEL,JOSEPH,PETER (2009) Glacial Geomorphology of southern Alberta, Canada, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/60/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Glacial Geomorphology of southern Alberta, Canada Nathaniel Joseph Peter Young A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science Department of Geography University of Durham April 2009 i Declaration of Copyright I confirm that no part of the material presented in this thesis has previously been submitted by me or any other person for a degree in this or any other university. In all cases, where it is relevant, material from the work of others has been acknowledged. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Nathaniel Joseph Peter Young Department of Geography University of Durham April 2009 ii Abstract During deglaciation from the Last Glacial Maximum three terrestrial ice streams within the south western sector of the Laurentide Ice Sheet competed and coalesced in southern Alberta; the High Plains Ice Stream (HPIS), Central Alberta Ice Stream (CAIS) and the east lobe. The ice streams are characterised by smoothed corridors along which lie lineations that identify multiple flow events, transverse ridges of thrust and push origin, esker networks and large sequences of parallel and transverse meltwater channels. The CAIS and HPIS were dynamic and transitory in nature creating a ‘time‐transgressive’ imprint. The CAIS terminated within southern Alberta creating a wealth of landforms composed of controlled, hummocky, push and thrust block moraines, along with doughnut hummocks, ice walled lake plains, recessional meltwater, tunnel and large spillway channels. The CAIS margin is interpreted to have been polythermal in nature, creating a continuum of landforms that is dominated by active marginal recession. The methodologies used were placed within an overarching ‘scale approach’, whereby the research initially focused on a small, regional scale and gradually moved to large scale, local investigations. Firstly, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper (Landsat ETM+) data sets were used to map the regional picture. Then, Aerial Photo Investigation (API), ground truthing and sedimentary analyses were employed to provide a detailed, localised focus into the landform sediment assemblages in southern Alberta. iii Contents Page Abstract iii List of figures vii List of Tables viii Acknowledgements ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Rationale 2 1.2 Aims and Objectives 4 1.3 Ice Streams 4 1.4 Ice Stream life cycle 5 1.4.1 Onset 5 1.4.2 Ice Streaming 6 1.4.3 Temporal behaviour and shutdown 8 1.5 Palaeo‐ice streams 9 1.5.1 Categories and criteria 9 1.5.2 Dynamics 10 1.6 The Geomorphic Imprint 11 1.6.1 Mega‐scale glacial lineations 11 1.6.2 Ribbed 'Rogen' moraines 13 1.6.3 Meltwater Hypothesis 14 1.7 Ice marginal features 14 1.7.1 Transverse ridges 15 1.7.2 Hummocky Terrain 16 1.8 Alberta 18 1.8.1 Alberta geology 21 1.9 Summary 22 2 Methods 23 2.1 Scale Dependent Model 24 2.2 Mapping 24 2.2.1 SRTM 25 2.2.1.1 Method 1 26 2.2.1.2 Method 2 28 2.2.2 Landsat ETM+ 30 2.2.3 Aerial Photo Investigation (API) 32 2.3 Sedimentary Analysis 33 2.4 Summary 34 iv 3 Results 35 3.1 Regional results 36 3.1.1 High Plains Ice Stream 36 3.1.2 Central Alberta Ice Stream 40 3.1.3 Flow‐sets and lineations 40 3.1.4 Transverse ridges 42 3.1.5 Hummocky terrain 46 3.1.6 Crevasse squeeze ridges 48 3.1.7 Esker networks 48 3.1.8 Meltwater Channels 49 3.2 Ice marginal landscape 51 3.2.1 Transverse Ridges 51 3.2.2 Hummocky terrain 57 3.2.3 Lineations 60 3.2.4 Glaciofluvial activity 60 3.3 Sedimentary results 62 3.3.1 Etzikom Coulée 62 3.3.2 Milk River 62 3.3.3 Writing on Stone 65 3.3.4 Ketchem Creek 65 3.3.5 Milk River Ridge Reservoir 68 3.3.6 Red Creek a 68 3.3.7 Red Creek b 68 3.3.8 Bow Island 69 3.3.9 Pendant d’Oreille 69 3.3.10 Cherry Coulée 71 3.3.11 Wolf Island 72 4 Interpretations 73 4.1 Glacial sedimentology 74 4.1.1 Till production 74 4.1.2 Glaciotectonics and sedimentary structures 74 4.2 Transverse ridges 76 4.2.1 Thrust ridges 76 4.2.1.1 CAIS marginal area 76 4.2.1.2 Southern Alberta 77 4.2.2 Push ridges 79 4.2.3 Push ridges and linear hummocks 80 4.2.4 Crevasse squeeze ridges 81 4.3 Hummocky Terrain 82 4.3.1 Hummocks (type1) 82 4.3.1.1 CAIS marginal area 82 v 4.3.1.2 Southern Alberta 83 4.3.2 Doughnut hummocks (type 2) 85 4.3.3 Ice walled lake plains (type 3) 85 4.4 Glaciofluvial and glaciolacustrine evidence 86 4.4.1 CAIS marginal area 86 4.4.2 Southern Alberta 88 4.5 Lineations and MSGLs 89 4.5.1 Southern Alberta 89 4.5.2 CAIS marginal area 91 4.6 Deglacial style of the CAIS 92 5 Discussion 96 5.1 Methods and data sources 97 5.1.1 Scale Dependent Model (SDM) 97 5.1.2 Mapping and Sedimentology 97 5.2 Terrestrial ice stream margin 98 5.3 Ice stream dynamics 101 5.3.1 Onset and location 102 5.3.2 Ice streaming ‐ temporal and spatial behaviour 103 5.3.3 Shutdown 104 5.3.3.1 Why did the CAIS shutdown? 104 5.3.3.2 What caused the CAIS to re‐advance? 106 6 Conclusions 108 6.1 Recommended further research 109 References 111 vi List of Figures Page Figure 1 Terrestrial and marine based ice streams (Stokes and Clark, 2001) 11 Figure 2 Terrestrial ice stream landsystem: time‐transgressive vs. Rubber 12 stamped (Evans et al., 2008, adapted from Clark and Stokes, 2003). Figure 3 Location maps of the study area 20 Figure 4 Large scale location map of the field site. 21 Figure 5 Digital Elevation Model created from Canadian Digital Elevation Data 26 Figure 6 Rendered Digital Elevation Model, created in Global Mapper 27 Figure 7 3D image of Global Mapper Digital Elevation Model 28 Figure 8 Grey scale image of SRTM data 29 Figure 9 Relief shaded profiles created from exported ENVI image files 30 Figure 10 Glacial geomorphology map of southern Alberta 37 Figure 11 Location map of Figures 13‐19 and transverse ridge sets 38 Figure 12 Reconstructed flow‐set map 39 Figure 13 Cross and long profiles of the study area 41 Figure 14 Example lineations and flowsets 43 Figure 15 Transverse ridge set examples 45 Figure 16 Transverse ridge set examples 46 Figure 17 Hummocky terrain examples 47 Figure 18 Crevasse squeeze ridges 48 Figure 19 Meltwater channels 50 Figure 20 Glacial geomorphology map of the CAIS marginal area Insert Figure 21 Location map of Figures 13E, 18‐36 and transverse ridge sets 52 Figure 22 Transverse ridge sets 1 and 2, located in the SE corner of the CAIS 53 marginal area Figure 23 Morphological characteristics of transverse ridge sets, types 1‐3 54 Figure 24 Type 2 transverse ridges located SE of Pakowki Lake and field work 55 photos of individual type 3 ridges Figure 25 Type 3 ridges sets within the CAIS marginal area 56 Figure 26 Hummocky terrain examples 58 Figure 27 Morphological characteristic of hummocky terrain types 1‐3 58 Figure 28 Hummocky terrain and ridges east of Del Bonita and field work photos of 59 type 1 hummocks. Figure 29 Field work photo of a lineation within CAfs_3 60 Figure 30 Spillway and meltwater channels within the CAIS marginal area 61 vii Figure 31 Etzikom Coulée cross section and stratigraphic log 63 Figure 32 Milk River cross section and stratigraphic log 64 Figure 33 Writing on Stone cross section and stratigraphic log, and Ketchem Creek 66 stratigraphic log Figure 34 Milk River Ridge Reservoir stratigraphic log 67 Figure 35 Red Creek cross section a 69 Figure 36 Red Creek cross section b 69 Figure 37 Bow Island stratigraphic log and grain size analysis 70 Figure 38 Pendant d’Oreille cross section and grain size analysis 71 Figure 39 Cherry Coulée and Wolf Island stratigraphic logs and grain size analysis 72 Figure 40 Deglacial timeline within southern Alberta 95 Figure 41 Terrestrial Ice marginal landform continuum and basal thermal regimes 100 List of Tables Page Table 1 List of Landsat ETM+ scenes 30 Table 2 Flowset data 42 Table 3 Ice stream geomorphological criteria 90 viii Acknowledgements I would firstly like to thank my parents for all of their support and generosity during the unexpectedly long time it has taken to complete this thesis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Little Bow Gets Bigger – Alberta's Newest River
    ALBERTA WILDERNESS Article ASSOCIATION Wild Lands Advocate 13(1): 14 - 17, February 2005 The Little Bow Gets Bigger – Alberta’s Newest River Dam By Dr. Stewart B. Rood, Glenda M. Samuelson and Sarah G. Bigelow The Little Bow/Highwood Rivers Project includes Alberta’s newest dam and provides the second major water project to follow the Oldman River Dam. The controversy surrounding the Oldman Dam attracted national attention that peaked in about 1990, and legal consideration up to the level of the Supreme Court over federal versus provincial jurisdiction and the nature and need for environmental impact analysis. A key outcome was that while environmental matters are substantially under provincial jurisdiction, rivers involve fisheries, navigation, and First Nations issues that invoke federal responsibility. As a consequence, any major water management project in Canada requires both provincial and federal review. At the time of the Oldman Dam Project, three other proposed river projects in Alberta had received considerable support and even partial approval. Of these, the Pine Coulee Project was the first to advance, probably partly because it was expected to be the least controversial and complex. That project involved the construction of a small dam on Willow Creek, about an hour south of Calgary. A canal from that dam diverts water to be stored in a larger, offstream reservoir in Pine Coulee. That water would then be available for release back into Willow Creek during the late summer when flows are naturally low but irrigation demands are high. Pine Coulee was generally a dry prairie coulee and reservoir flooding did not inundate riparian woodlands or an extensive stream channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Lakes Perspective Oldman River Region 1
    GOVDC CA3 AL Lsthoriar^a^Ar.a t< OMR 9 1975 04 2 REGIONAL LAKES PERSPECTIVE OLDMAN RIVER REGION i?rJ 1. INVENTORY OLDMAN RIVER REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 1975 J GOVDC CA3 AL OMR 9 197 5 042 Oldman River Regional Planning Commission Oldman River region : regional lakes perspective. 1. Inventory 35057007687147 OLDMAN RIVER REGION REGIONAL LAKES PERSPECTIVE 1. INVENTORY Project Co-ordinator: John L. Kovacs, Associate Planner Report & Research: Lynda Paterson, Research Officer Michael Luco, Research Officer Published by OLDMAN RIVER REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION October, 1975 FOREWORD In December, 1974, the Preliminary Regional Plan for the Oldman River Region was approved by the Provincial Planning Board. The Plan con­ tains guidelines and policies for the development and betterment of the Oldman River Region. Among other things, the Plan established that a com­ prehensive plan for outdoor recreation and open space facilities is required for the Region and that such a plan should be consistent with municipal, provincial and federal objectives. This report entitled, Oldman River Region — Regional Lakes Perspective 1. Inventory is the first stage of an evolving regional plan for out­ door recreation and open space. It contains a summary of relevant data nec­ essary for management planning of our region's lake resources. This inventory was made possible through assistance provided by the Land Use Forum's Technical Committee on Lakes and Lake Shorelands and methodologies developed by its participating agencies. This inventory on lakes also forms part of the survey phase of the Southern Alberta Recreation Enhancement Study set up through Alberta Environment to assess and enhance water based recreation in Southern Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 1
    Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 1 Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 2 Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 List of Tables and Figures ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Forward ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 Introduction-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 History -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Population --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Transportation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Natural History --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Crop Use----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 Irrigation------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 18 Cropping Limitations and Conservation Farming ------------------------------------------------- 20 Confined Feeding Operations and Livestock ------------------------------------------------------ 22 Diverse Agriculture---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Economic Activity------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • RURAL ECONOMY Ciecnmiiuationofsiishiaig Activity Uthern All
    RURAL ECONOMY ciEcnmiIuationofsIishiaig Activity uthern All W Adamowicz, P. BoxaIl, D. Watson and T PLtcrs I I Project Report 92-01 PROJECT REPORT Departmnt of Rural [conom F It R \ ,r u1tur o A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, D. Watson and T. Peters Project Report 92-01 The authors are Associate Professor, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton; Forest Economist, Forestry Canada, Edmonton; Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton and Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton. A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta Interim Project Report INTROI)UCTION Recreational fishing is one of the most important recreational activities in Alberta. The report on Sports Fishing in Alberta, 1985, states that over 340,000 angling licences were purchased in the province and the total population of anglers exceeded 430,000. Approximately 5.4 million angler days were spent in Alberta and over $130 million was spent on fishing related activities. Clearly, sportsfishing is an important recreational activity and the fishery resource is the source of significant social benefits. A National Angler Survey is conducted every five years. However, the results of this survey are broad and aggregate in nature insofar that they do not address issues about specific sites. It is the purpose of this study to examine in detail the characteristics of anglers, and angling site choices, in the Southern region of Alberta. Fish and Wildlife agencies have collected considerable amounts of bio-physical information on fish habitat, water quality, biology and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta
    Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Submitted to: Submitted by: SSRB Water Storage Opportunities AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Steering Committee a Division of AMEC Americas Limited Lethbridge, Alberta Lethbridge, Alberta 2014 amec.com WATER STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES IN THE SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER BASIN IN ALBERTA Submitted to: SSRB Water Storage Opportunities Steering Committee Lethbridge, Alberta Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure Lethbridge, Alberta July 2014 CW2154 SSRB Water Storage Opportunities Steering Committee Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin Lethbridge, Alberta July 2014 Executive Summary Water supply in the South Saskatchewan River Basin (SSRB) in Alberta is naturally subject to highly variable flows. Capture and controlled release of surface water runoff is critical in the management of the available water supply. In addition to supply constraints, expanding population, accelerating economic growth and climate change impacts add additional challenges to managing our limited water supply. The South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Water Supply Study (AMEC, 2009) identified re-management of existing reservoirs and the development of additional water storage sites as potential solutions to reduce the risk of water shortages for junior license holders and the aquatic environment. Modelling done as part of that study indicated that surplus water may be available and storage development may reduce deficits. This study is a follow up on the major conclusions of the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Water Supply Study (AMEC, 2009). It addresses the provincial Water for Life goal of “reliable, quality water supplies for a sustainable economy” while respecting interprovincial and international apportionment agreements and other legislative requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic and Ecologic Study of the Riverbottom Forest on St
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 36 Number 3 Article 1 9-30-1976 A taxonomic and ecologic study of the riverbottom forest on St. Mary River, Lee Creek, and Belly River in southwestern Alberta, Canada Robert K. Shaw Cardston, Alberta, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Shaw, Robert K. (1976) "A taxonomic and ecologic study of the riverbottom forest on St. Mary River, Lee Creek, and Belly River in southwestern Alberta, Canada," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 36 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol36/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University Volume 36 September 30, 1976 No. 3 A TAXONOMIC AND ECOI.OGIC STUDY OF THE RIVERBOTTOM FOREST ON ST. MARY RIVER, LEE CREEK, AND BELLY RIVER IN SOUTHW^ESTERN ALBERTA, CANADA Robert K. Shawi Abstr.\ct. — The riverbottom forest community of St. Mary River. Lee Creek, and Belly River in southvvestern Alberta. Canada, is a unique ecological entity characterized by poplar species hav- ing their major Alberta distribution along these streams. Stands in the community are dominated by three tree species, six shrub species, and nine herb species. Establishment of the community is dependent on climate and substrate; destruction is the result of progressive lateral stream-flow erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Op5 Onlineversion.Cdr
    Southern Alberta’s Watersheds: An Overview Occasional Paper Number 5 Acknowledgements: Cover Illustration: Liz Saunders © This report may be cited as: Lalonde, Kim, Corbett, Bill and Bradley, Cheryl. August 2005 Southern Alberta’s Watershed: An Overview Published by Prairie Conservation Forum. Occasional Paper Number 5, 51 pgs. Copies of this report may be obtained from: Prairie Conservation Forum, c/o Alberta Environment, Provincial Building, 200 - 5th Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta Canada T1J 4L1 This report is also available online at: http://www.AlbertaPCF.ab.ca Other Occasional Paper in this series are as follows: Gardner, Francis. 1993 The Rules of the World Prairie Conservation Co-ordinating Committee Occasional Paper No. 1, 8 pgs. Bradley, C. and C. Wallis. February 1996 Prairie Ecosystem Management: An Alberta Perspective Prairie Conservation Forum Occasional Paper No. 2, 29 pgs. Dormaar, J.F. And R.L. Barsh. December 2000 The Prairie Landscape: Perceptions of Reality Prairie Conservation Forum Occasional Paper No. 3, 37 pgs. Sinton, H. and C. Pitchford. June 2002 Minimizing the Effects of Oil and Gas Activity on Native Prairie in Alberta Prairie Conservation Forum Occasional Paper No. 4, 40 pgs. Printed on Recycled Paper Prairie Conservation Forum Southern Alberta’s Watersheds: An Overview Kim Lalonde, Bill Corbett and Cheryl Bradley August, 2005 Occasional Paper Number 5 Foreword To fulfill its goal to raise public awareness, disseminate educational materials, promote discussion, and challenge our thinking, the Prairie Conservation Forum (PCF) has launched an Occasional Paper series and a Prairie Notes series. The PCF'sOccasional Paper series is intended to make a substantive contribution to our perception, understanding, and use of the prairie environment - our home.
    [Show full text]
  • Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O
    30% SW-COC-002397 Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O. Box 2100 Station M Calgary, AB Canada T2P 2M5 Street Address: 625 - 25th Ave S.E. Bow River Basin Council Mark Bennett, B.Sc., MPA Executive Director tel: 403.268.4596 fax: 403.254.6931 email: [email protected] Mike Murray, B.Sc. Program Manager tel: 403.268.4597 fax: 403.268.6931 email: [email protected] www.brbc.ab.ca Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 Overview 4 Basin History 6 What is a Watershed? 7 Flora and Fauna 10 State of the Watershed OUR SUB-BASINS 12 Upper Bow River 14 Kananaskis River 16 Ghost River 18 Seebe to Bearspaw 20 Jumpingpound Creek 22 Bearspaw to WID 24 Elbow River 26 Nose Creek 28 WID to Highwood 30 Fish Creek 32 Highwood to Carseland 34 Highwood River 36 Sheep River 38 Carseland to Bassano 40 Bassano to Oldman River CONCLUSION 42 Summary 44 Acknowledgements 1 Overview WELCOME! This State of the Watershed: Summary Booklet OVERVIEW OF THE BOW RIVER BASIN LET’S TAKE A CLOSER LOOK... THE WATER TOWERS was created by the Bow River Basin Council as a companion to The mountainous headwaters of the Bow our new Web-based State of the Watershed (WSOW) tool. This Comprising about 25,000 square kilometres, the Bow River basin The Bow River is approximately 645 kilometres in length. It begins at Bow Lake, at an River basin are often described as the booklet and the WSOW tool is intended to help water managers covers more than 4% of Alberta, and about 23% of the South elevation of 1,920 metres above sea level, then drops 1,180 metres before joining with the water towers of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • South Saskatchewan River Basin Adaptation to Climate Variability Project
    South Saskatchewan River Basin Adaptation to Climate Variability Project Climate Variability and Change in the Bow River Basin Final Report June 2013 This study was commissioned for discussion purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the Climate Change Emissions Management Corporation, which is funding the South Saskatchewan River Basin Adaptation to Climate Variability Project. The report is published jointly by Alberta Innovates – Energy and Environment Solutions and WaterSMART Solutions Ltd. This report is available and may be freely downloaded from the Alberta WaterPortal website at www.albertawater.com. Disclaimer Information in this report is provided solely for the user’s information and, while thought to be accurate, is provided strictly “as is” and without warranty of any kind. The Crown, its agents, employees or contractors will not be liable to you for any damages, direct or indirect, or lost profits arising out of your use of information provided in this report. Alberta Innovates – Energy and Environment Solutions (AI-EES) and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta make no warranty, express or implied, nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained in this publication, nor that use thereof infringe on privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of AI-EES or Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta. The directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants of AI-EES and the Government of Alberta are exempted, excluded and absolved from all liability for damage or injury, howsoever caused, to any person in connection with or arising out of the use by that person for any purpose of this publication or its contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Fingerprinting in the Lower Little Bow River Using Cs-137 As a Tracer
    Melody Caron et al. Sediment fingerprinting in the Lower Little Bow River Sediment fingerprinting in the Lower Little Bow River using Cs-137 as a tracer Melody Caron Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba David A. Lobb Department of Soil Science, Watershed Systems Research Program, University of Manitoba Jim J. Miller Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Kui Liu Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba Phillip N. Owens Environmental Science Program, University of Northern British Columbia The Lower Little Bow River watershed is a source of irrigation water for southeast Alberta. However, sediment in the river can be detrimental to both irrigation pump equipment and the health of the river. In order to understand and manage how sedi- ment moves through a watershed, a study of sediment sources was conducted along a reach of the Lower Little Bow River employing fingerprinting techniques. The radionuclide cesium-137 was used as a tracer to determine whether the sediment in the river is being generated by surface or subsurface erosion processes. The main sources of sediment were found from subsur- face erosion of an irrigation return-flow channel, coulee walls, and the river’s stream banks. This demonstrates that subsurface erosion is the principle generator of sediment in the Lower Little Bow. Through measurement of multiple points along the reach, the study also determined that the composition of the suspended sediment load did not change as it moved downstream in the river. Keywords: soil erosion, sedimentation, sediment fingerprinting, cesium-137, irrigation, Alberta Introduction tion, where an increase in nutrient concentration causes exces- The sources of suspended sediments in watersheds can be identi- sive algal growth on the surface of water (Barthod et al.
    [Show full text]
  • December 15, 2017 Wade Vienneau Executive Director, Facilities Alberta
    December 15, 2017 Wade Vienneau Executive Director, Facilities Alberta Utilities Commission 400, 425 – 1st Street SW Calgary, AB, T2P 3L8 Dear Mr. Vienneau: Re: Alberta Electric System Operator (“AESO”) Alberta Utilities Commission (“Commission”) Proceeding 171; Application No. 1600682; Needs Identification Document (“NID”) for the Southern Alberta Transmission Reinforcement (“SATR”); SATR Milestones and Monitoring Process (“MMP”) Status Report for Q4 2017 The AESO writes in connection with the SATR NID Application,1 the most recent SATR NID approval issued by the Commission, being Needs Identification Document Approval 21190-D04-2016, dated June 9, 2016,2 and the SATR MMP approved by the Commission in Decision 2010-343 dated July 19, 2010.3 Enclosed with this letter is an update to the AESO’s SATR Construction Milestones report as of Q4 2017 (“Status Report”). The Status Report summarizes the status of the different SATR construction milestone measures used to confirm the need for the transmission developments approved as part of SATR. Contemporaneous with the filing of this letter, the AESO is posting a copy of the Status Report on its website, and will be including a link to the Status Report in its next stakeholder newsletter. In the original SATR NID, approved by the Commission on September 8, 2009, the AESO indicated that, if an identified trigger for the different components of SATR did not occur by the end of 2017, then the approval of the need related to such trigger would cease to be of any effect, and would have to be 1 Proceeding 171, Exhibit 0001.00.AESO-171. 2 Commission Needs Identification Document Approval 21190-D04-2016, Alberta Electric System Operator Amendment to Southern Alberta Transmission Reinforcement (June 9, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary and Late Tertiary of Montana: Climate, Glaciation, Stratigraphy, and Vertebrate Fossils
    QUATERNARY AND LATE TERTIARY OF MONTANA: CLIMATE, GLACIATION, STRATIGRAPHY, AND VERTEBRATE FOSSILS Larry N. Smith,1 Christopher L. Hill,2 and Jon Reiten3 1Department of Geological Engineering, Montana Tech, Butte, Montana 2Department of Geosciences and Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Idaho 3Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Billings, Montana 1. INTRODUCTION by incision on timescales of <10 ka to ~2 Ma. Much of the response can be associated with Quaternary cli- The landscape of Montana displays the Quaternary mate changes, whereas tectonic tilting and uplift may record of multiple glaciations in the mountainous areas, be locally signifi cant. incursion of two continental ice sheets from the north and northeast, and stream incision in both the glaciated The landscape of Montana is a result of mountain and unglaciated terrain. Both mountain and continental and continental glaciation, fl uvial incision and sta- glaciers covered about one-third of the State during the bility, and hillslope retreat. The Quaternary geologic last glaciation, between about 21 ka* and 14 ka. Ages of history, deposits, and landforms of Montana were glacial advances into the State during the last glaciation dominated by glaciation in the mountains of western are sparse, but suggest that the continental glacier in and central Montana and across the northern part of the eastern part of the State may have advanced earlier the central and eastern Plains (fi gs. 1, 2). Fundamental and retreated later than in western Montana.* The pre- to the landscape were the valley glaciers and ice caps last glacial Quaternary stratigraphy of the intermontane in the western mountains and Yellowstone, and the valleys is less well known.
    [Show full text]