DOCSLIB.ORG

North Macedonia Social Briefing: Prime Minister Zaev Sparks Social Outrage Following Bulgaria’S Veto to Macedonian EU Accession Negotiations Gjorgjioska M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Macedonia Social Briefing: Prime Minister Zaev Sparks Social Outrage Following Bulgaria’S Veto to Macedonian EU Accession Negotiations Gjorgjioska M ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 34, No. 3 (MK) November 2020 North Macedonia social briefing: Prime Minister Zaev sparks social outrage following Bulgaria’s veto to Macedonian EU accession negotiations Gjorgjioska M. Adela 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Prime Minister Zaev sparks social outrage following Bulgaria’s veto to Macedonian EU accession negotiations On the 17th of November, Bulgaria vetoed the opening of EU accession negotiations with N. Macedonia. The Bulgarian veto sparked a chain of events, which culminated with an interview given by Macedonian Prime Minister Zoran Zaev to a Bulgarian TV station.1 The interview provoked wide-spread social outrage. Numerous institutions, public intellectuals, current and former officials criticized Zaev and the overall approach of the Government, describing it as overly conciliatory, damaging and disrespectful for the position of the country and its history. The backlash went so far as to accuse the Prime Minister of complicity with the Bulgarian government in their negationism of Macedonian language, identity and (anti-fascist) history. Most importantly however, the social outrage revealed the big and widening gap between the ruling political elite and the positions espoused by the people they claim to represent. The EU negotiation frameworks for N.Macedonia (and Albania) were scheduled to be signed off on November 10 at the EU General Affairs Council and accession negotiations were expected to commence in December 2020. However, in the weeks leading up to these dates, Bulgaria engaged in an aggressive diplomatic offensive, crystalizing its threats to block the Macedonian path towards EU membership. By early October it was reported that Bulgaria had sent a Memorandum to the Council of the EU. The document, supported by all political parties represented in the Bulgarian Parliament, consists of six pages of elaborations and antagonistic claims. As part of it, Bulgarian authorities have argued that N.Macedonia needs to “break with the ideological legacy and practices of communist Yugoslavia”.2 Moreover, it included the highly offensive claims that “the Macedonian nation was an artificial construct created by the 1 https://bgnesagency.com/world/balkans/%d0%b7%d0%b0%d0%b5%d0%b2- %d0%b4%d0%be%d0%b3%d0%be%d0%b2%d0%be%d1%80%d1%8a%d1%82-%d1%89%d0%b5- %d0%b1%d1%8a%d0%b4%d0%b5-%d0%b7%d0%b0%d0%ba%d0%be%d0%bd-%d1%89%d0%b5- %d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5/?fbclid=IwAR0wLbT9wTZoolFf9hwsUKBT3FYMAKuiOw- 4dyVWUSou8HQtDgrstAgw2_c 2https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2020/09/22/bulgaria-sends-a-memorandum-on-north-macedonian-eu- accession-on-their-state-sponsored-anti-bulgarian-ideology/ 1 Yugoslav Communists” and that “the Macedonian language was an artificial construct based on a Bulgarian dialect”. Criticisms against the Memorandum have come from many directions, but also from Bulgaria itself. On the 5th of October, a group of Bulgarian historians, scholars and public figures issued an open letter condemning Sofia’s memorandum and insisting on the need for a “fundamental change of the paradigm in historical thinking” in Bulgaria. According to them, Sofia demonstrates outdated views and makes unsustainable and naive claims against Macedonia. Moreover they locate the problem in the “worn out legacy of the romanticized, myth-making historiographic opinion in Bulgaria”.3 Similar criticisms have come from the Bulgarian scholar Tchavdar Marinov, who attempted to illustrate the absurdity of the Bulgarian claims by making some comparable analogies: “Can we imagine Germany demanding that Vienna officially recognize that Mozart was German in order to join the EU?4 Germany, which is currently presiding with the Council of the EU, made some final diplomatic efforts to prevent the veto from materializing. On the 2nd of November, talks between a Macedonian and Bulgarian delegation were hosted in the German Federal Foreign Office in Berlin.5 When these last efforts failed, the hostile rhetoric by Bulgarian officials continued. Several days before the official veto, MFA of Bulgaria Zaharieva stated: ”You cannot want to be a member of the European family, on the one hand, and on the other – to venerate one of the most atrocious dictators of the 20th century – Josip Broz Tito.” The statement was met with opposition and ridicule not only in Macedonia, but also across all of the former Yugoslav countries, where Tito is broadly respected as a figure of historical importance, not least due to the many positive aspects that people still recall from life in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Several days later, comments made by Prime Minister Zaev in an interview for the Bulgarian news agency BGNES, sparked anger and public outrage in the country. Zaev stated that “Bulgaria had not been an occupying force” during the 3https://www.mediapool.bg/evropa-ne-ni-razbira-balgarski-ucheni-poiskaha-novo-istorichesko-mislene-za- severna-makedoniya-news312809.html 4https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/43443/europe-does-not-understand- us?cHash=c4187ece4743addf394d7376286c703b&fbclid=IwAR3i0IkmTtKMAQbZIpk7Ia1Vy3iSgQMmbzZn62t4R SXZd-fWiDBEiUHOsHk 5 https://360stepeni.mk/vo-berlin-popladnevo-na-ista-masa-dimitrov-osmani-i-zaharieva-so-germanski- olesnuvachi/ 2 Second World War. Furthemore, he added that former Yugoslavia is what had kept Macedonians and Bulgarians apart. Finally, he added: “We already replaced 20 plaques on which it was written, ‘Bulgarian Fascist occupier’. This is not true – Bulgaria is not a fascist country; it is our friend,” Zaev said.6 The spurious remarks by the Prime Minister sparked immediate social outrage across the Macedonian social sphere. In the days that followed social media was flooded with personal stories written by grandchildren of former partisans from the Second World War, remembering their fight and the atrocities committed by the Bulgarian fascist occupiers, which had fought on the side of the Axis powers during the Second World War.7 The common thread in such emotional commentaries was the feeling of national betrayal committed by the Prime Minister, due to his evident disregard, disrespect and negation of the national heroes who laid the foundations of Macedonian statehood. Historians and linguists wrote extensively about the scientific unsoundness of his remarks. Zaev was also condemned by a member of the Macedonian team in the joint Bulgarian-Macedonian history committee, Ljubica Spaskovska.8 “As member of the Macedonian part of the commission, I personally distance myself and condemn the latest remarks of the PM,” she said, adding: “I appeal to politicians to withhold themselves from claims and comments on subjects with which they are not acquainted, and are not in their domain,”9 Spaskovska wrote on Facebook. She was soon joined by her colleague on the same commission, Ognen Vangelov, who also distanced himself from the PM’s statements. Public criticism also came from the ranks of Zaev’s own party. Former leader of the Social Democrats, former President and PM Branko Crvenkovski, described the interview as 6 https://balkaninsight.com/2020/11/26/north-macedonia-pms-remarks-about-bulgarian-history-hit-a-nerve/ 7 https://sitel.com.mk/kalina-korchagin-do-zaev-dali-imeto-na-mojot-dedo-kje-go-zamenish-so-imeto-na- negoviot-ubiec-za-tvoi 8 A joint Bulgaria-N. Macedonia Commission on Educational and Historical issues, set up as part of the Treaty of Friendship and Good Neighbourly Relations signed in 2017, https://mfa.gov.mk/en/document/1712 9 https://www.slobodnaevropa.mk/a/30968935.html 3 “scandalous”.10 By way of protest he announced that he is freezing his membership in the SDSM and called on other party members to distance themselves from the views of the Prime Minister. Ilinka Mitreva, former Minister of Foreign Affairs from the ranks of the SDSM was also openly critical. She stated: “Zaev's views are the final blow he gives to Macedonia. He started by changing the name of our country in Prespa, and now he is reaching for our identity, our language and our history - by negating notorious historical facts, such as the fascist occupation of Macedonia.”11 A joint Memorandum titled “Macedonian Manifesto” was signed and published by official representatives of the Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University and the Macedonian Orthodox Church. Among else, the Memorandum expressed the concern about the way in which the process of EU integration is unfolding and urged the State institutions (including the President, the Government and the Parliamentary Assembly) in particular “to respect the knowledge, established facts, adopted theories and empirical research of contemporary world Slavic studies, linguistics, historiography and international law, with regards to the authenticity and autochthony of the Macedonian people, its historical, language, cultural and religious continuity.12 Parties from the opposition consistently called for Zaev’s resignation.13 From the 27th of November, protests started to be organized in spite of the ongoing pandemic. The political party Levica (“the Left”) insisted on an urgent parliamentary discussion of their “Parliamentary Draft Declaration condemning the Bulgarian national-chauvinist pretensions” submitted to Parliament on the 22nd of October. They argued that the Declaration was proposed as an act of unification of all political actors regarding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country Position Name Email Albania President Mr. Ilir Meta [email protected] Prime Minister Mr
    Country Position Name Email Albania President Mr. Ilir Meta [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Edi Rama [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Ditmir Bushati [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Ms. Besiana Kadare [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Ravesa Lleshi [email protected] Belarus President Mr. Alexander Lukashenko [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Siarhiej Rumas [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Vladimir Makei [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Valentin Rybakov [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Mr. Yury Ambrazevich [email protected] Bosnia and HerzegovinaCo-President Mr. Šefik Džaferović [email protected] Co-President Mr. Milorad Dodik [email protected] Co-President Mr. Željko Komšić [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Zoran Tegeltija [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Igor Crnadak [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Sven Alkalaj [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Nermina Kapetanovic [email protected] Bulgaria President Mr. Rumen Radev [email protected] Prime Minister Ms. Boyko Borissov [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mrs. Ekaterina Spasova Gecheva-Zakharieva [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Georgi Velikov Panayotov [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Deyana Kostadinova [email protected] Croatia President Mr. Zoran Milanović [email protected] Prime Minister Andrej Plenković [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: the Macedonian Question—Resolved?
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 48: 2, 205–214 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.10 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVENTS The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: The Macedonian Question—Resolved? Matthew Nimetz* Former Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and former Special Envoy of President Bill Clinton, New York, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The dispute between Greece and the newly formed state referred to as the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” that emerged out of the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 was a major source of instability in the Western Balkans for more than 25 years. It was resolved through negotiations between Athens and Skopje, mediated by the United Nations, resulting in the Prespa (or Prespes) Agreement, which was signed on June 17, 2018, and ratified by both parliaments amid controversy in their countries. The underlying issues involved deeply held and differing views relating to national identity, history, and the future of the region, which were resolved through a change in the name of the new state and various agreements as to identity issues. The author, the United Nations mediator in the dispute for 20 years and previously the United States presidential envoy with reference to the dispute, describes the basis of the dispute, the positions of the parties, and the factors that led to a successful resolution. Keywords: Macedonia; Greece; North Macedonia; “Name” dispute The Macedonian “name” dispute was, to most outsiders who somehow were faced with trying to understand it, certainly one of the more unusual international confrontations. When the dispute was resolved through the Prespa Agreement between Greece and (now) the Republic of North Macedonia in June 2018, most outsiders (as frequently expressed to me, the United Nations mediator for 20 years) responded, “Why did it take you so long?” And yet, as protracted conflicts go, the Macedonian “name” dispute is instructive as to the types of issues that go to the heart of a people’s identity and a nation’s sense of security.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Analysis
    VIENNEAST COMPASS – NORTH MACEDONIA: ELECTION ANALYSIS OUTLOOK: • Parliamentary elections were held on 15 July; • Zoran Zaev’s SDSM-BESA coalition emerged as the largest single bloc by two seats but failed to secure an absolute majority; • The high rate of abstention by Macedonian voters resulted in DUI and AA-Alternativa accruing historic gains at the expense of SDSM-BESA and VMRO-DPMNE, given that the Albanian constituency mobilized in normal numbers; • DUI not only retains its status as kingmaker, but will have increased influence; • A coalition government involving SDSM-BESA, DUI and DPA is the most likely scenario, with an Albanian prime minister emerging as a possibility. • The institutional and business environment is likely to remain unchanged, albeit with greater government instability, as the ruling majority is likely to be no more than 1-2 seats in the most realistic scenarios. 1. Overview On 16 July, elections were held for the 120 seats comprising North Macedonia’s unicameral parliament. Voting was organised in line with extraordinary health measures, which had been imposed owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, the infection rate of which has experienced an upsurge over the past month. Turnout amounted to 51.3%, a historic low, and down from 66% in 2016. The conduct of the election was largely in line with international standards, despite some isolated irregularities. With 98.3% of ballots counted, the breakdown of seats between the party lists is as follows: European Principle Group www.europeanprincipalgroup.com [email protected] Parliamentary election – seat share (out of 120) SDSM-BESA 54 46 VMRO-DPMNE 51 44 DUI 10 15 AA-Alternativa 3 12 Levica 0 2 DPA 1 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Last election (2016) Seat share As predicted, the SDSM-BESA alliance, led by Zoran Zaev, emerged as the largest party, albeit without an absolute majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Zoran Zaev Prime Minister of the Republic of North Macedonia Skopje Macedonia
    INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION Mr Zoran Zaev Prime Minister of the Republic of North Macedonia Skopje Macedonia By e-mail: [email protected] PERC/AL/pw Brussels, 14 June 2021 Dear Prime Minister, Repression of trade unions in North Macedonia The ITUC and the ETUC are concerned about continuous systematic pressure and attacks on our affiliate KSS and its trade unions, and the discrimination against trade union leaders and representatives, reflected in demotions, mobbing, harassment, and dismissals. Previously, we expressed our indignation about violations against the Independent Trade Union of Energy when union members were transferred to another union by the administration or arbitrarily assigned to posts in remote parts of North Macedonia. In connection with these violations, KSS also addressed the labour inspection, and as this provided no results, a court procedure was conducted before the competent court, which passed a verdict – already final – in favour of KSS members. Unfortunately, to date this judgment has not been implemented. Please be informed that we are working on development of a complaint to the International Labour Organisation about this well-documented case of violation of ILO Convention 87 by North Macedonia. Furthermore, we are also concerned about the fact that KSS was denied full involvement in the national social dialogue, prevented from participating in the process of economic and social policy building, and denied the possibility to represent the interests and promote the rights of its members in development of actions to tackle the challenges of the health and economic crisis. We understand that while certain improvements have occurred in relations between different trade union organisations of the country, the discrimination against KSS by state officials and public institutions continues, and the pressure does not stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia: Defusing the Bombs
    Macedonia: Defusing the Bombs Crisis Group Europe Briefing N°75 Skopje/Brussels, 9 July 2015 I. Overview Macedonia is reeling from two shocks. Amid a scandal over leaked wiretaps revealing a state apparatus captured and corrupted by the leading party, a battle in ethnically mixed Kumanovo between police and ethnic-Albanian gunmen, many from Kosovo, caused the region’s worst loss of life in a decade. Unless addressed urgently, the double crisis (government legitimacy/regional security) carries risk that could extend to violent confrontation, perhaps in worst case to elements of the conflict narrowly averted in 2001. Discredited national institutions cannot cope alone. The opposition has broken off talks on a European Union (EU) mediated deal between parties for reforms and early elections that deadlocked, substantially over whether the prime minister, in power since 2006, must resign and the time a transitional government would need to level the field. The EU must press for a comprehensive agreement addressing the state capture and alleged corruption, including independ- ent investigation and monitoring with international help. Macedonia and Kosovo, also with aid, should jointly investigate Kumanovo. In February 2015, the main opposition party began publishing excerpts from what it said was an illegal wiretap program leaked by unidentified persons. The massive surveillance, from at least 2010 to 2014, seems to have targeted thousands, including nearly all top opposition and government officials, as well as ambassadors and media figures. The fraction of published wiretaps focus on what appear to be conversations of senior government persons plotting to subvert elections, manipulating courts, controlling a nominally independent press and punishing enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose Roth Report
    ROSE-ROTH 98th ROSE-ROTH SEMINAR REPORT EURO-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION OF THE WESTERN BALKANS: REINFORCING THE EUROPEAN PEACE PROJECT SKOPJE, THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA* 27-29 June 2018 225 SEM 18 E | Original: English | 26 October 2018 This Seminar Report is presented for information only and does not necessarily represent the official view of the Assembly. This report was prepared by Andrius Avizius, Director of the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security. 225 SEM 18 E INTRODUCTION 1. The NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NATO PA) met in Skopje for its 98th Rose-Roth Seminar from 27 to 29 June 2018, less than two weeks after the historic agreement on the name issue between Prime Ministers Alexis Tsipras and Zoran Zaev. 2. Western lawmakers felt a palpable surge of optimism in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia* after years of despair over the lack of progress towards European and Euro-Atlantic integration. The Prime Minister, Zoran Zaev, the speaker of the parliament, Talat Xhaferi, and other high-ranking government officials noted that the country has made significant breakthroughs in recent years, both domestically – bolstering democratic institutions, judicial and media independence, the rule of law and interethnic cohesion – and internationally – signing milestone agreements with Bulgaria and Greece. 3. During the three-day seminar, local and international experts, diplomats and government officials addressed the ongoing reform processes across all government sectors. The seminar also tackled other important topics for the Western Balkans, including the state of interethnic relations, the role of disinformation and misinformation in public discourse as well as the migration crisis and the Balkan Route.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Study
    A PROJECT OF THE INTERNATIONAL REPUBLICAN INSTITUTE I JUST WANT SOMEONE TO RESPOND TO MY EMAIL”: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON UNDECIDED VOTERS’ VIEWS AND EXPERIENCE WITH LOCAL AND NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS IN NORTH MACEDONIA I JUST WANT SOMEONE TO RESPOND TO MY EMAIL”: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON UNDECIDED VOTERS’ VIEWS AND EXPERIENCE WITH LOCAL AND NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS IN NORTH MACEDONIA Center for Insights in Survey Research IRI.org @IRIglobal © 2021 All Rights Reserved “I JUST WANT SOMEONE TO RESPOND TO MY EMAIL”: Qualitative research on undecided voters’ views and experience with local and national governments in North Macedonia Copyright © 2021 International Republican Institute. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of the International Republican Institute. Requests for permission should include the following information: • The title of the document for which permission to copy material is desired. • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: Attn: Department of External Affairs International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] IRI | North Macedonia – Focus Group Research on Local and National Governments 1 IRI IN NORTH MACEDONIA A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization founded in 1983, parties, transparency, and accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resolution of the Macedonian Name Dispute: A
    THE RESOLUTION OF THE MACEDONIAN NAME DISPUTE: A STUDY OF THE FACTORS THAT LED TO THE SIGNING OF THE PRESPA AGREEMENT Asen Voynov [email protected] S2247216 June 2019 Asen Voynov S2247216 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................2 List of Abbreviations...................................................................................................................3 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................4 1.1 Research Question .............................................................................................................5 1.2 Relevance ..........................................................................................................................6 2. Historical Context ...................................................................................................................8 2.1 The Birth of the Macedonian Question ...............................................................................8 2.2 The Birth of a Nation ....................................................................................................... 10 2.3 The Birth of the Name Dispute ........................................................................................ 11 3. Literature Review .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • N. Macedonia, EU Are You Blind & the Bulgarian Veto the Communist Past
    N. Macedonia, EU are you blind & the Bulgarian Veto George Dimakos (Research Fellow, IIER) Stylianos Galatoulas (Postgraduate Student, NKUA) The relations of Bulgaria and North “The Prespa Agreement was unexpected. Macedonia have been very complicated It provided a solution to the issue of the mainly due to the Bulgarian reluctance to name and recognized the existence of recognize a national identity for the citizens of Macedonian identity and language. As North Macedonia. Bulgaria has stated clearly expected, the Prespa Agreement ignited that considers North Macedonia part of its the Bulgarian government's immediate own cultural family. response, which responded by issuing a framework position.” North Macedonia and its neighbours, The communist past especially the two close ones with which the In 1946, the Bulgarian Communist Party country had historically troubled relations, recognized the Macedonian language and Bulgaria and Greece. In 2017, also Bulgaria identity to approach Tito, the Yugoslavian and North Macedonia reached an agreement communist leader. This diplomatic effort did and signed a Τreaty of Friendship, Good- not last long due to the increased tensions Neighbourhood, and Cooperation. The two between Joseph Stalin, Chairman of the countries agreed on a commission of experts Council of Ministers of the Soviet Union and in charge of finding common ground in General Secretary of the Communist Party, historical and cultural issues. and Tito. As a result Yugoslavia was expelled In the same period, the North Macedonian from Cominform -the alliance of the government negotiated with Greece in a communist parties – in June 1948. Bulgaria desperate effort to solve a major political supported and the Soviet Union thereby cut problem, the issue of the name of the all diplomatic ties with the “traitors”.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Resolving the Greek- Macedonian Name Dispute: Will It Break the Gordian Knot at Last? Erwan Fouéré
    18 June 2018 Progress in resolving the Greek- Macedonian name dispute: Will it break the Gordian knot at last? Erwan Fouéré Some might argue that Macedonia is being asked to pay an unduly heavy price simply for the sake of starting EU accession negotiations, while others will believe that the Agreement reached last weekend is well worth that price. f all the many bilateral disputes that continue to cast a shadow over the Western Balkan region, none is more symbolic of the deep-rooted legacy of history and the O politics of identity and nationalism that pervade the region than the dispute that has divided the two neighbouring countries, Greece and Macedonia, for decades and more recently since the latter’s independence in 1991 following the break-up of the former Yugoslavia. Greece, whose northern province is also called Macedonia, used every opportunity to make clear its objection to what it perceived as the appropriation by Macedonia of the heritage of Alexander the Great, and what it called its “irredentist behaviour”. Macedonia’s admission to the UN under the provisional name of the “former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” was blocked for over a year until 1993. The Interim Agreement of 1995 lifted the 20-month Greek blockade against Macedonia and committed both sides to continue negotiations under UN auspices and enjoined Greece from blocking Macedonia’s application for membership in other international bodies as long as it did so under the provisional name. Under the patient guidance of the UN mediator Matthew Nimetz appointed in 1995, various attempts were made over the years to find a compromise solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia, Albania and Northern Macedonia Will Open a New Era of Economic and Political Co-Operation
    Serbia, Albania and Northern Macedonia will open a new era of economic and political co-operation Serbia, Albania and Northern Macedonia will open a new era of economic and political co- operation after a major business forum bringing together about 250 companies from the Western Balkans in Skopje tomorrow. The requirements of the economy and the idea of a single market in which companies would operate much easier, simpler and faster, should be put into practice – politics. That is why the Prime Ministers of Albania and Northern Macedonia, Edi Rama and Zoran Zaev, and the President of Serbia, Aleksandar Vucic, will participate in this gathering. The organizers of this most important economic gathering in the last few years are the chambers of commerce of the region and the Serbian Chamber of Commerce. PKS President Marko Cadez says that the economy of the region has put before its politicians several important initiatives that should lead to even better business of our economies. “We are entering a completely new era of economic and political cooperation in the region, especially when it comes to these three countries, Albania, Northern Macedonia and Serbia. We see concrete shifts and benefits for the economy and citizens, and we invite other ZB6 economies to join,” says Cadez. The Prime Ministers of Albania and Northern Macedonia and the President of Serbia will sign several agreements that will greatly facilitate the business of our economies and make the common market more competitive for the largest European and world companies. “We want to remove all barriers to the free flow of people, goods, services and capital in our countries, so that all permits from the competent inspections, market, phytosanitary and others, are valid in all countries, regardless of where they are issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations in Transit 2021
    NATIONS IN TRANSIT 2021 The Antidemocratic Turn NATIONS IN TRANSIT 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Nations in Transit 2021: The Antidemocratic Turn ................................. 1 Instability and Repression in Russia ................................................. 5 Managing Expectations about Breakthrough Elections ....................... 7 Standing In and Standing Up ......................................................... 10 Nations in Transit 2021 Map ........................................................... 12 Media Matters ............................................................................. 14 Hope and Pushback: How Citizens and Political Leaders Can Band Together to Counter Repression ...................................... 15 Recommendations ............................................................................. 18 Nations in Transit 2021: Scores ............................................................ 22 Nations in Transit 2021: Overview of Score Changes .............................. 24 Methodology .................................................................................... 25 Nations in Transit 2021: Category and Democracy Score Summary ......... 26 Nations in Transit 2021: Democracy Score History by Region .................. 27 This booklet was made possible through the generous support of the US Agency for International Development and the Lilly Endowment. Freedom House is solely responsible for the report’s content. RESEARCH AND EDITORIAL TEAM Elisha Aaron, David Meijer, Shannon O'Toole, and Tyler
    [Show full text]