DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Arbitration Notice of Arbitration of OOO "Manolium- Processing" Dated 15 November 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notice of Arbitration Notice of Arbitration of OOO TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................. 5 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 10 II. PARTIES TO ARBITRATION AND OTHER COMPANIES INVOLVED .................... 11 2.1. Claimant............................................................................................................................... 11 2.2. Respondent .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Manolium-Engineering ....................................................................................................... 13 III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 14 3.1. Republic of Belarus ............................................................................................................. 14 3.1.1. General Information .................................................................................................... 14 3.1.2. Political System And State Administration ................................................................. 15 3.1.3. Economic System Of The State .................................................................................... 15 3.1.4. Currency System Of The State ..................................................................................... 17 3.1.5. Regulation Of Foreign Investments And Treatment Of Foreign Investors ............... 19 IV. CLAIMANT'S PROJECT ..................................................................................................... 21 4.1. General Information About The Claimant's Project ....................................................... 21 4.2. Amendments To The Amount And Timing Of Investments Under The Investment Contract (2003)................................................................................................................................ 28 4.3. Issues In Performance Of The Investment Contract In 2004-2006 ................................ 32 4.3.1. Change Of The Party To The Investment Contract .................................................... 32 4.3.2. Failure To Issue A Permit To Design And Construct The Land Plot For The Depot .. ....................................................................................................................................... 33 4.3.3. Failure To Make The Land Plot Available For Constructing The Motor Transport Base ....................................................................................................................................... 34 4.4. Execution Of The Amended Investment Contract ........................................................... 35 (i) Right to implement the Investment Object ............................................................................ 36 (ii) Amount of Investments Under the Amended Investment Contract .................................... 38 (iii) Mcec's Obligations Under The Amended Investment Contract ........................................ 39 (iv) Minsktrans' Obligations Under The Amended Investment Contract................................. 40 (v) Procedures for Amendments and Termination of the Amended Investment Contract ...... 40 (vi) Financial Liability of the Claimant and Manolium-Engineering ..................................... 41 4.5. Design And Construction Of The New Communal Facilities And Investment Object After Signing The Amended Investment Contract ...................................................................... 42 4.5.1. Design And Construction Of The "Depot" New Communal Facility ........................ 42 4.5.2. Design And Construction Of The "Road" New Communal Facility ......................... 46 4.5.3. Design And Construction Of The New Communal Facility Pull Station .................. 49 4.5.4. Design Of The Investment Object ................................................................................ 52 4.6. Negotiations Between The Claimant And The Republic Of Belarus. Termination Of The Investment Contract ............................................................................................................... 59 2 4.6.1. First Round Of Negotiations, Administrative Proceedings In The Court Of The Republic Of Belarus ..................................................................................................................... 59 4.6.2. Proceedings With The First Instance Court Of The Republic Of Belarus ................ 61 4.6.3. Proceedings With The Court Of Appeal Of The Republic Of Belarus ...................... 63 4.6.4. Second Round Of Negotiations, Proceedings In The Court Of Cassation Of The Republic Of Belarus ..................................................................................................................... 64 4.6.5. Third Round Of Negotiations, Cao Of The Ministry Of Finance Report And The Second Administrative Proceedings In The Court Of The Republic Of Belarus ...................... 66 4.7. Selling The Land Plot To Another Investor ..................................................................... 68 4.8. Tax Claims Of The Republic Of Belarus Against The Claimant ................................... 69 V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................ 74 5.1. Applying The Provisions Of The EEU Treaty .................................................................. 74 5.2. Application Of The Investment Law Of The Republic Of Belarus ................................ 75 5.3. The Claimant Is An Investor In Accordance With The Requirements Set Forth By The EEU Treaty And The Investment Law Of The Republic Of Belarus ........................................ 76 5.4. The Claimant Made Investments On The Territory Of The Republic Of Belarus ....... 78 5.4.1. Requirements In Respect Of Investments Set Forth By The EEU Treaty And The Investment Law Of The Republic Of Belarus ............................................................................. 78 5.4.2. Qualification Of Investments ....................................................................................... 80 5.5. The Claimant's Claims Comply With The Provisions Of The EEU Treaty And The Investment Law Of The Republic Of Belarus .............................................................................. 81 5.6. Legal Protection Of The Claimant Set Forth By The EEU Treaty And The Investment Law Of The Republic Of Belarus .................................................................................................. 82 5.6.1. Guarantees Of The Claimant's Rights In Case Of Expropriation ............................. 82 5.6.2. Guarantees Of The Fair And Equitable Treatment In Respect Of Investments And Investment-Related Activities Of The Claimant .......................................................................... 84 5.6.3. Protection Of The Claimant's Investments On The Territory Of The Republic Of Belarus 85 5.6.4. Other Guarantees ......................................................................................................... 85 VI. VIOLATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS IN RESPECT OF THE CLAIMANT AND INVESTMENTS ................................................................................................. 87 6.1. Responsibility Of The Republic Of Belarus For Acts Of The State Organs And State- Owned Entitles ................................................................................................................................ 87 (a) Responsibility Of The Republic Of Belarus Before The Claimant For Acts Of MCEC In Respect Of The Claimant And Investments ............................................................................ 88 (b) Responsibility Of The Republic Of Belarus Before The Claimants For Acts Of Minsktrans .................................................................................................................................... 90 (c) Responsibility Of The Republic Of Belarus Before The Claimant For Acts Of The Court Of The Pervomaysky District Of Minsk, Economic Court of Minsk And The Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Belarus .............................................................................................. 90 6.2. Violation By The Republic Of Belarus Of Its Guarantee To Provide The Claimant With The Fair And Equitable Treatment In Respect Of Investments And Investment-Related Activities .......................................................................................................................................... 92 6.2.1. FET Standard In Respect Of Investments And Investment-Related Activities .......... 92 3 6.2.2. The Republic Of Belarus Failed To Perform The Obligation To Act In A Transparent Manner In Respect Of The Claimant ................................................................. 95 6.2.3. The Republic Of Belarus Failed To Perform The Obligation To Act In Good Faith In Respect Of The Claimant ........................................................................................................ 98 (i) MCEC and Minsktrans deliberately protracted the process of issuing construction permits and making available the land plots for constructing the Communal Facilities and the New Communal Facilities ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western Or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 78 | Number 78 Article 5 4-2018 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Murzionak, Piotra (2018) "Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization?," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 78 : No. 78 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol78/iss78/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Murzionak: Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or t Comparative Civilizations Review 41 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Abstract The aim of this article is to further develop the idea of the existence of a distinct Belarusian-Ukrainian/Western-Ruthenian civilization, to define its place among Western sub-civilizations, as well as to argue against the designation of Belarus and Ukraine as belonging to the Eurasian civilization. Most of the provided evidence will be related to Belarus; however, it also applies to Ukraine, the country that has had much in common with Belarus in its historical and cultural inheritance since the 9th and 10th centuries. Key words: designation, Belarus, Europe, civilization Introduction The designation of a modern country or group of countries to one or another civilization bears two aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Past, Current, and Future of the Central European Corridor for Aquatic Invasions in Belarus
    Biol Invasions (2008) 10:215–232 DOI 10.1007/s10530-007-9124-y ORIGINAL PAPER Past, current, and future of the central European corridor for aquatic invasions in Belarus Alexander Y. Karatayev Æ Sergey E. Mastitsky Æ Lyubov E. Burlakova Æ Sergej Olenin Received: 5 April 2007 / Accepted: 8 May 2007 / Published online: 25 July 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract We analyzed the role of the waterways of first comprehensive review of aquatic exotic inverte- Belarus in the spread of aquatic exotic invertebrates brates in Belarus. Currently, 19 exotic aquatic through the central European invasion corridor. invertebrates are known in Belarus, including 14 Present day Belarus became critically important species of Ponto-Caspian origin. The rate of spread of when in the end of the 18th—beginning of the 19th aquatic invasive species in the second half of the 20th century three interbasin canals connecting rivers from century increased 7-fold compared to the 19th— the Black and Baltic seas basins were constructed for beginning of the 20th century. We found a significant international trade. These canals became important positive correlation between the time since initial pathways facilitating the spread of aquatic alien invasion and number of waterbodies colonized. We species. For more than a hundred years, only Ponto- predict a further increase in the rate of colonization of Caspian species colonized Belarus using ships and Belarus by exotic invertebrates as well as an increase especially timber in rafts exported by Russia into in the diversity of vectors of spread and donor areas Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eurasian Customs Union and the Economic Geography of Belarus: a Panel Convergence Approach Mehmet Güney Celbis, Pui‐Hang Wong and Tatjana Guznajeva
    Working Paper Series #2018-029 The Eurasian customs union and the economic geography of Belarus: A panel convergence approach Mehmet Güney Celbis, Pui‐Hang Wong and Tatjana Guznajeva Maastricht Economic and social Research institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU‐MERIT) email: [email protected] | website: http://www.merit.unu.edu Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG) email: info‐[email protected] | website: http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/governance Boschstraat 24, 6211 AX Maastricht, The Netherlands Tel: (31) (43) 388 44 00 UNU-MERIT Working Papers ISSN 1871-9872 Maastricht Economic and social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology UNU-MERIT Maastricht Graduate School of Governance MGSoG UNU-MERIT Working Papers intend to disseminate preliminary results of research carried out at UNU-MERIT and MGSoG to stimulate discussion on the issues raised. The Eurasian Customs Union and the Economic Geography of Belarus: A panel convergence approach∗ Mehmet G¨uneyCelbisy Pui-Hang Wong,z Tatjana Guznajevax Version dated July 3, 2018 Abstract This study presents novel research on the economic geography of Belarus. The 118 regions of Belarus are examined in relation to the Eurasian Customs Union (EACU) through the period 2005-2014. Spatial clusters and outliers are identified and compared across the periods prior and after the establishment of the EACU. We observe that EACU membership corresponds to a slowdown in the process of regional economic convergence in Belarus, and intensified economic competition with a geographical dimension among regions. We also observe that urban regions have benefited more from the EACU than less urbanised areas. Key words: Eurasian Customs Union, Belarus, convergence, spatial analysis, economic inte- gration.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Subdivision of Belarus in Decimal System
    Galina I.Martsinkevich, Ivan I. Pirozhnik Belarusian State University Faculty of Geography PHISICAL-GEOGRAPHICAL SUBDIVISION OF BELARUS IN DECIMAL SYSTEM Summary: The analysis of all schemes of physical-geographical subdivisions (PGS) of Belarus is made. The timeframe of our research is from the Dement’evs works (1959, 1960), who di- vided the territory of Belarus on the 6 provinces, 6 okrugs, 40 regions and 53 subregions until nowadays. The proposed scheme of physical-geographical subdivisions is made in decimal sys- tem, which is linked with PGSs of neighbouring countries, including the scheme of Poland’s subdivision, which has been developed by professor J. Kondracki (1988) in the same system and consists of 5 provinces, 14 okrugs and 49 regions. Key words: physical-geographical subdivision, Belarus, taxonomic units, physical- geographical principles Territorial heterogeneousness of the geographical shell has attracted attention of geogra- phers since ancient times and contributed into evolution of the particular scientific direction in geography, which took a name of subdivision. Sectoral and complex subdivision is distinguished according to the completeness of the reflection of the nature properties. The works regarding dis- covering of territorial differentiation of individual natural components are referred to the first kind of subdivision (climatic, geomorphologic, geobotanical, hydrological subdivisions). Com- plex subdivision (physical-geographical and landscape) reflects the structure, diversity and hier- archy of the geographical complexes). Despite a variety of the researches in the field of complex subdivision, the pick of which is typical for the second half of the 20th century, the problems of given scientific direction have not been solved neither from the methodological nor from the practical point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • Vyacheslav Shved
    Vyacheslav Shved Ethnic Groups, History, and Memory in Grodno As Arkadil Smolich wrote about Grodno in the Geography of Belarus (1919): 'It is one of the best and most interesting cities of Belarus, a little isle of an old western civilization which lies near the Nieman forests.'1 The settlement on the bank of Nieman appeared at the end of the tenth to the beginning of the eleventh centuries. It is mentioned for the first time in the Ipatev chronicle on 11 or 14 August 1127. Grodno (earlier Goroden, Gorodnia) was the center of Gorodnia Duchy till 1240 and was a vassal of the Grand Duke of Kiev. From then until 1795 (the third Partition of Poland) Grodno was a central district and a residence of the Grand Duke of Lithuania. It was considered one of the most important cities of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. After the Union of Lublin in 1596 it became a town of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. From 1795 to 1917 Grodno was the center of district and from 1802 of a province in the Russian Empire, where the provincial administration was concentrated. Grodno survived the First World War and German occupation. In 1917— 19 it was part of the Belarusian National Republic and the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic (BSSR). From 21-28 April 1920 there were Polish armies in Grodno. Then Soviet armies took over for five months. The Polish army returned on 25 September 1920 and after the Treaty of Riga Grodno remained part of the Polish Second Republic as a regional town of the Bialystok region.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Sector in Belarus: Focus on Wood and Peat Fuels
    Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 171 http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2010/mwp171.htm ISBN 978-951-40-2251-7 (PDF) ISSN 1795-150X Energy sector in Belarus: Focus on wood and peat fuels Yuri Gerasimov www.metla.fi Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 171 http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2010/mwp171.htm Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute publishes preliminary research results and conference proceedings. The papers published in the series are not peer-reviewed. The papers are published in pdf format on the Internet only. http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/ ISSN 1795-150X Office Post Box 18 FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland tel. +358 10 2111 fax +358 10 211 2101 e-mail [email protected] Publisher Finnish Forest Research Institute Post Box 18 FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland tel. +358 10 2111 fax +358 10 211 2101 e-mail [email protected] http://www.metla.fi/ 2 Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 171 http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2010/mwp171.htm Authors Gerasimov, Yuri Title Energy sector in Belarus: Focus on wood and peat fuels Year Pages ISBN ISSN 2010 62 978-951-40-2251-7 (PDF) 1795-150X Unit / Research programme / Projects Joensuu Unit / 7395 Central and Eastern European Forest Information Service Accepted by Timo Karjalainen, Professor, 8.9.2010 Abstract The energy sector in Belarus makes up approximately 30% of the industrial structure of the country. The role of the sector is large both in exports (36% of the total export value) and imports (39% of the total import value).
    [Show full text]
  • C., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, Telephone 978-750-8400, Fax 978-750-4470
    Report No: ACS13961 . Republic of Belarus Public Disclosure Authorized Regional Development Policy Notes The Spatial Dimension of Structural Change . June 22, 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized . GMFDR EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA . Public Disclosure Authorized . Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202- 522-2422, e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Language Policies and Law in Education in Post-Soviet Belarus
    Language Policies and Law in Education in Post-Soviet Belarus Iryna Ulasiuk ECMI Working Paper #50 September 2011 ECMI Working Paper The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI‟s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of interethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethnopolitical tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Working Papers are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Working Paper European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Tove H. Malloy © ECMI 2011 2 | P a g e ECMI Working Paper Language Policies and Law in Education in Post-Soviet Belarus The dissolution of the Soviet Union brought to the fore claims of l inguistic minorities which had been ignored far too long. In almost all of the former Soviet republics language became an impetus to national revival and an important instrument in consolidating the newly independent states. At times excessively accentuated and overly politicized, the language issue demanded immediate reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet Youth: Engagement in Civil Society—Belarus and Beyond
    Post-Soviet Youth: Engagement in Civil Society—Belarus and Beyond LARISSA G. TITARENKO n much of the current literature on social and political transformation in I Belarus, once the most prosperous republic of the former Soviet Union (FSU), the focus tends to be on the snail’s pace of market reforms and development of civil society.1 Social analysis of the role youth may play in this process of trans- formation seems to have been largely neglected. However, there is hardly a more crucial indicator of the future of a society than the patterns of behavior and ori- entations of its youth, whatever the political regime happens to be at the moment. In this article, I focus on the first post-Soviet generation of youth—those young people whose civil socialization began during Gorbachev’s perestroika, who have never lived under any social conditions except those of the transition period and have not inherited the civil habits of the previous system. Belarus, located between Russia and Poland at the crossroads of Europe, is a strategically important country today and will remain one for many years to come. But what is in the cards for the future of the country is a question for the people of Belarus. There are also questions about the increasing social expectations of the younger generation and the country’s decreasing ability to meet them. I also present specific characteristics of present-day Belarus society that make it different from Russia and that are likely to become predominant in the future. I then examine the rising expectations of the post-Soviet generation of youth and explain why Belarus society cannot meet them.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Geography in Belarus
    9. GEOGRAPHY IN BELARUS The first geographical data pertaining to the per week) and a course entitled “Continents and area of modern Belarus appeared in the ancient Oceans” in Year 7 (1 lesson per week). In Year 8, chronicles of the 11th and 12th centuries and in the the course is entitled “Countries and Nations” (2 Belarusian and Polish chronicles of the 13th–16th lessons per week), and this is followed in Year 9 centuries (Map of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania by “Geography of Belarus” (2 lessons per week). by Makowski, T. 1613). The works of scientists Pupils in Year 10 complete a course entitled from the 18th and 19th centuries contain detailed “World Economy” (1 lesson per week at the basic descriptions of the natural features of the area. level or 3 lessons per week at the advanced level). In the second half of the 19th century and in the Finally, in Year 11, pupils complete a course enti- early 20th century, members of the north-western tled “Global Processes” (1 lesson per week at the branch of the Russian Geographical Society col- basic level or 3 lessons per week at the advanced lected significant amounts of data (Picturesque level). An exam in geography does not feature on Russia by Semenov, P.P. 1882). Systematic geo- the list of obligatory final school examinations. graphical research relating to the area of today’s In Belarus, students can enrol in B.Sc. or Belarus began to develop in the 20th century B.A. courses in higher education based on their (e.g.
    [Show full text]