Aging Differences in Microslips and Stroop Interference Rate
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of the Tsuruma Health Science Society Kanazawa University Vol.38(1) Original Article 67 〜 74 2014 The usefulness of the Stroop effect during sorting movements -Aging differences in microslips and Stroop interference rate- KazushiKitayama,KatsuyukiShibata* Abstract Thisstudyaimstoverifythedifferencesintaskexecutionaccordingtooralandmanual classification,thecorrelationbetweenrequiredtimeandthenumberofmicroslips,andthe differenceintheStroopinterferencerateamongyoungpeopleandmiddle-agedpeople. Therewere16targetsinExperiment1(21 to55yearsofage);andinExperiment2,30 targetsintheyounggroup(ages 20to39)and30inthemiddle-agedgroup(ages 40to59), allofwhomwerenormal,healthyadults.Weusedfourvarietiesof16classificationcards, andclassifiedeach.InExperiment1,wecalculatedtherequiredtimefortheoralandmanual tasksandtheStroopinterferencerate;andinExperiment2,wecalculatedtherequiredtime duringthemanualtasks,theStroopinterferencerate,andthenumberofmicroslips,and comparedtheoralandmanualtasks,aswellastheyounggroupandthemiddle-agedgroup. TheStroopinterferenceratewassignificantlyhigherduringtheoraltasksthanduringthe manualtasks(p <.05).Comparingtheyounggrouptothemiddle-agedgroup,themiddle- agedgrouphadasignificantlyhigherStroopinterferencerateinbothoralandmanualtasks thantheyounggroup(p <.05).Themiddle-agedgroup’snumberofmicroslipsincreased significantlycomparedtotheyounggroup(p<.05). Asforthecorrelationbetweenthe requiredtimesandthenumberofmicroslips,ahighcorrelationwasshowninthe4varieties ofclassificationcards(p <.05).Inthisstudy,theStroopinterferencerateonchoicereaction washigherinoraltasksthaninmanualtasks.Furthermore,oralreactiontimeswereslower thanmanualreactiontimesinbothsimpleandchoicereactiontasks.Itwasindicatedthatthe numberofmicroslipsincreaseswiththedelayintime,andacorrelationbetweenthenumber ofmicroslipsandtimewasshown. Key Words Strooptask,Stroopinterferencerate,Microslip,Manualtask,Aging Introduction functionishelpfulinevaluatingtheirbasicandapplied Weareexposedtovarioustypesofinformationfrom movements.Amongtheexecutivefunctiontests,the ourperipheralenvironment,andweactwhileselecting WisconsinCardSortingTest(WCST) isusedinclinical thenecessaryinformation.However,itisdifficultto settings,butifitcanbeadministeredrelativelyeasily processinformationwhilesimultaneouslyselecting asStrooptasks,itmaybegenerallyusefulasaclinical numerouspiecesofinformation1-2).Executivefunctionhas evaluationtoolfortheelderly.Hasheretal. 6 ) usedthe theabilitytoplan,inhibit,andcontrolattentionandactions3). WCSTasarestraintfunctionthatcausedtheStroop Inrecentyears,ithasbeenindicatedthatexecutive effect.AcharacteristicoftheStroopeffectisthatthe functiondisorderscontributetoelderlypeople’sfalls outputsuppressesaresponsetoeasystimulus,and andthedeclineinactivitiesofdailyliving(ADL) 4-5).It theoutputisataskthatrespondstodifficultstimulus. issuggestedthatevaluatingelderlypeople’sexecutive Additionally,theStroopeffecthasastrongcorrelationto KeiaiHospital * SchoolofSciencesCollegeofMedical,PharmaceuticalandhealthSciences,KanazawaUniversity −67− Kazushi Kitayama , et al. theMiniMentalStateExaminationdementiaevaluation7), werearrangedonawhiteboardinfour-cardcolumnsand andthedecreaseinrestraintfunctioniscausedby four-cardrows.Thecardswere6×6squarecentimeter. cognitivefunctiondecline8-9).WiththeStroopeffect, 3)ExperimentSetting ratherthanthenamingofcolors,thereadingofthe Thesubjects’measuredposturewasseated(Figure 2). letters/wordsisfast10).Generally,aStrooptaskhasoral Handmovementsduringtheexperimentwererecorded responses,andtherequiredtimeshowstherestraint withavideocamera(Canon: iVIHR1). reactionuntiltheresponse.Thistypeofrestraintreaction 4)Implementation occursnotonlyinoralbutalsoinmanualresponses.In Themethodsinvolvedorallysorting(oral sort)and aclinicalsetting,makingasubjectiveevaluationwhile manuallysorting(manual sort)theclassificationcards. observingapatient’sbehavioriscommon.Itissuggested Theoralsortwas1)WordCards:WordReading,2)Color thatquantitativelyevaluatingnon-fluentmovement Cards:ColorNaming,3)Color-WordCards:ColorNaming, isimportantininvestigatinghindrancesinbehavioral and4)Word-ColorCards:WordReading.Themanual actions. sortwas1)WordCard:SortbyWord,2)ColorCards: Thisstudyfocusedontheusefulnessoftheevaluation SortbyColor,3)Color-WordCards:SortbyColor,and4) oftheStroopeffectduringsortingmovements.Inour Word-ColorCards:SortbyWord.Theinstructionswere dailyactions,themicroslipphenomenonoftenoccurs,such tocallthecolororwordofthecards,orputtheminthe ashesitatingbehavior,thetrajectoryofourmovements, classificationboxesbyhand. andchangesintheshapeofourhands11).Criteriaof 5)AnalyzingMethod themicroslipsis"Hesitations","TrajectoryChanges", Thetimerequiredfortaskexecutionwasmeasured "HandShapeChanges",and"TouchesandTake/Gives". byastopwatchfromthevideorecordingofthesubjects’ IntheStrooptaskinthisstudy,thedegreeofexecutive vocalizationsandmovements.Themeasurement functionisnotlimitedtorequiredtime.Inthisway,itis wasperformedbytwooccupationaltherapists,who possibletodemonstratemovementpatternsasamicroslip determinedtheaveragerequiredtime. phenomenon. 6)StatisticalProcessing Thegoalsofthisresearchweretoverify 1 ) the TheStroopinterferencerate12)wascalculatedaccording differencesbetweentheoralclassificationandmanual tothecalculationmethodsofHakodaetal(Stroop classification2),thecorrelationbetweenthetimerequired interferencerate=((3) requiredtimeofthecolor-word forataskandthenumberofmicroslips,and3)the cards-(2) requiredtimeofcolorcards)/(2)required differencesbetweentheyounggroupandthemiddle-aged timeofthecolorcards ×100).Thecomparisonof groupinamanualStrooptask. manualsortingandoralsortingwastestedbyatwo-way analysisofvariance.Additionally,toclarifythepresence Methods orabsenceofinteractionbetweenthetwotasks,asa 1. Experiment 1: The differences between oral secondarytest,weperformedmultiplecomparisons, classification and manual classification makingaBonferroniadjustmenttoapairedt-test.For 1)Subjects thecomparisonoftheyounggroupandthemiddle-aged Thesubjectswere16normal,healthyadults(aged 35.5 group,anunpairedt-testwasperformed.Thesignificance ±10.1).Wereceivedwrittenconsentfromthesubjects, levelswerealllessthan5%. explainingthepurposeofourresearchbothverballyand 2. Experiment 2: Differences among tasks and age inwriting.Ourresearchwascarriedoutwiththeapproval group in manual sorting oftheMedicalEthicsCommitteeofKanazawaUniversity 1)Targets (approvalnumber:353). Therewere30targetsintheyounggroup(ages 20 2)ClassificationCards to39)and30targetsinthemiddle-agedgroup(ages 40 Theclassificationcardswerecomposedofthefollowing to59);allsubjectswerenormal,healthyadults,andall fourvarieties:16black-inkwordcards(red: 4;blue:4; wereright-handed.Theaverageageintheyounggroup yellow:4;green:4),16coloredcolorcards,32incongruent was30.2 ±4.6,andtheaverageageinthemiddle-aged color-wordcards(Figure 1).Theclassificationcards groupwas49.3±6.0.Wereceivedwrittenconsentfrom −68− The usefulness of the Stroop effect during sorting movements -Aging differences in microslips and Stroop interference rate- Figure 1. Sorting Card The classification cards are composed of the following four varieties: 16 black-ink word cards(red: 4; blue: 4; yellow: 4; green: 4), 16 colored color cards, 32 incongruent color-word cards. Figure 2. The setting of the experiment design The subjects’ measured posture is seated. Hand movements during the experiment are recorded with a video camera. thesubjects,explainingthepurposeofourresearchboth asasecondarytest,weperformedmultiplecomparisons, verballyandinwriting.Ourresearchwascarriedout makingaBonferroniadjustmenttoapairedt-test.For withtheapprovaloftheMedicalEthicsCommitteeof thecomparisonoftheyounggroupandthemiddle-aged KanazawaUniversity(approval number:353). group,anunpairedt-testwasperformed.Thesignificance 2)ClassificationCards levelswerealllessthan5%.Forthecorrelationcoefficient Theclassificationcardsarethesameasusedin betweenthetimeandthenumberofmicroslips,Spearman’ Experiment1. srankcorrelationwascalculated.TheStroopinterference 3)ExperimentSettingandMethods rate12)wascalculatedaccordingtothecalculationmethods Theexperimentsettingandmethodsarethesameasin ofHakodaetal.12). Experiment1(Figure 2). FromthecalculatedStroopinterferencerate,apaired 4)AnalysisMethods t-testwasperformedcomparingmanualsortingand Theevaluationitemsmeasuredtherequiredtimeand oralsortingtasks,withaBonferroniadjustment.Again, thenumberofmicroslips.Themicroslipcalculationwas forthecomparisonoftheyounggroupandthemiddle- performedbytwooccupationaltherapistsandtheinter- agedgroup,anunpairedt-testwasperformed.The rateragreementwasdeterminedbythekappacoefficient. significancelevelswerealllessthan5%.Thestatistical 5)StatisticalProcessing analysissoftwareSPSS(Version 20)wasusedduringthe Thecomparisonofmanualsortingandoralsortingwas statisticalprocessing. testedbyatwo-wayanalysisofvariance.Toclarifythe presenceorabsenceofinteractionbetweenthetwotasks, −69− Kazushi Kitayama , et al. Table 1. The average of required time for oral sorting and manual intherequiredtimeforwordcardsandcolorcards. sorting However,therequiredtimeforcolor-wordcardsamong oralsorting manualsorting themiddle-agedgroup(28.7 seconds)wassignificantly wordcards 7.7 ± 0.5 21.0± 3.3 colorcards 9.9 ± 0.6 19.2 ± 2.0 slowercomparedtotheyounggroup(23.1 seconds)(p < color-wordcards 15.3 ± 1.4 25.7 ± 6.5 .05).Intheword-colorcardsasignificantdifferencewas word-colorcards 10.0 ± 0.6 19.7 ± 4.1 (seconds) confirmedbetweenthemiddle-agedgroup(21.4 seconds) In the comparison of time among tasks, the required time for color-word cards