Downloaded for Personal Non‐Commercial Research Or Study, Without Prior Permission Or Charge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloaded for Personal Non‐Commercial Research Or Study, Without Prior Permission Or Charge Osman, Yusuf Ali (2018) British employees of the Ottoman government: the Pasas Hobart and Woods. PhD thesis. SOAS University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/30898 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. BRITISH EMPLOYEES OF THE OTTOMAN GOVERNMENT: THE PAŞAS HOBART AND WOODS YUSUF ALI OSMAN Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD 2018 Department of History SOAS, University of London 3 ABSTRACT This thesis seeks to examine the roles of Augustus Charles Hobart-Hampden (Hobart Paşa) and Henry Felix Woods (Woods Paşa) as employees of the Ottoman Government between 1867-1909. Chapter one describes the origins of the thesis and analyses current literature. Chapter two provides an outline of Ottoman reform efforts in the nineteenth century, some challenges it faced, some brief remarks on Anglo-Ottoman relations and finally summarizes the careers of Hobart and Woods. Chapter three looks at their roles within the Ottoman Navy between 1867-1878 and outlines their efforts to help reform that institution and argues that they were given naval responsibilities that went beyond the reason for their initial employment. Chapter four covers the period 1878-1886 and shows how their roles began to change from only working in the Ottoman Navy to functions related to being Aide-de-camp to the Sultan. These included supporting the Sultan and his empire in print and being used as part of his personal diplomacy. This chapter largely concentrates on the work of Hobart. Chapter five covers the period 1886-1909 and argues that Woods took over Hobart’s functions after his death. Both Hobart and Woods performed useful work for their employer, the Ottoman Government, in all areas in which they were used. 4 CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND TABLES ................................................................................................ 5 DEDICATION...................................................................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 7 ABBREVIATIONS AND REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER TWO. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER THREE. HOBART AND WOODS: 1867-1878 ...................................................................... 66 CHAPTER FOUR. HOBART AND WOODS: 1878-1886 ..................................................................... 135 CHAPTER 5. WOODS PAŞA 1886-1909 .......................................................................................... 217 CHAPTER SIX. CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 300 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................. 305 5 List of Illustrations and Tables Fig. I: Hobart Pasha; Engraved by G. I. Stewart from a Photograph p. 37 Fig. II: Admiral Sir Henry Woods Pasha p. 55 Fig. III: Black Sea Antique Engraved Hand-Coloured Map, drawn & engraved by J. Rapkin. (Publisher: London H. Wrinkles, J. Rapkin. 1851). p.110 Fig. IV: Russo-Turkish War. Hobart Pasha, Commander of the Turkish naval forces, descending the Danube, in April, in a despatch boat, to inspect the Russian fortifications. p.114 Fig. V: Hobart’s diagram showing defence against torpedoes: Diagram printed in an article by Hobart entitled ‘The Torpedo Scare’ in Blackwoods Edinburgh Magazine p.122 Fig. VI: Imperial Order of the Osmanié, 2nd class awarded to Algernon Borthwick p.150 Fig. VII: Synoptical table the population of those parts of Asia Minor where the Armenians of both sexes are more numerous than elsewhere in the Ottoman Empire according to the last census p.279 6 DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to the memory of my father Ali Yusuf Osman 1950-2010. Hard working, generous and kind, he encouraged me to follow my desires wherever they may lead in the pursuit of happiness. There have been occasions Baba where working on my PhD has fallen short of that, but I hope you’ll agree, it was worth it in the end. 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a large number of people without whom this thesis would not have been possible. Professor Benjamin Fortna, my supervisor, has been a consistent source of encouragement and support. During the dark days when I lost faith in myself, he continued to believe in my ability to complete. He has read and commented on drafts of this thesis and I am very grateful for his feedback. Doctor Kathleen Taylor, Doctor Eleanor Paremain and Jessica Tearney-Pearce all assisted me in accessing archival and printed sources. I am blind and without them I would not have been able to find let alone read many of the documents I have used. Without Disabled Students Allowance I would not have been able to pay for their assistance. Without the assistance of Doctor Candan Badem and Edip Golbaşi I would not have been able to access the Ottoman Archives. My Ottoman Turkish is non-existent and there is no way of reading documents in this language in Braille or through synthetic speech. They provided me with English translations of relevant documents which have been used throughout this thesis. Thanks to them my research is fuller than it would otherwise have been and I can lay claim to be an Ottoman historian. I’d like to extend thanks to Dr Feroze Yasamee for allowing me to use his own translations of documents from the Ottoman Archives. I’d like to express my thanks to Dr Ebru Akcsu for providing me with summary English translations of three books in Turkish. Sinan Kuneralp (owner of The Isis Press) was generous enough to make an electronic version of one of his books available to me free of charge and for that I am truly grateful. Thanks should also go to Dr Kathleen Taylor who translated a number of items in French into English, and also to Kathleen Taylor, Jessica Tearney-Pearce, Jo Macey and Catherine Turner for proof reading various drafts of this thesis. The Disability Support Office at SOAS have ensured that I’ve been able to get the support I needed without which this PhD would have been impossible. Angie Akson and Zoe Davis deserve special mention in this respect. The EE Wiley Scholarship, the Snowdon Trust and the Sir Richard Stapley Educational Trust all provided me with grants which have supported me in paying tuition fees. Without which I would not have been able to complete this research. I am very grateful too all those who kindly donated through my Go Fund Me page. I have used documents contained in a variety of archives. I would like to thank the staff of the Prime Ministry Archives, The Museum of the Sea and the Yıldız Palace Archives, in Turkey, The National Archives in the United Kingdom, the British Library, the West Sussex local archive, the Baring Archive, Lambeth Palace Archives, Oxford University Library Archives, Cambridge University Library Archives and the University of Leeds Library Archive. I would like to thank Her Majesty the Queen for permission to quote from documents contained within the Royal Archives. I would also like to thank the sixth Marquis of Salisbury for permission to quote from the papers of the fourth Marquis. I’d like to thank Doctor Stefano Taglia for his assistance in contacting the successor to the Whitehead torpedo Company and thank them for providing me with a copy of WASS: 133 years of history, the official history of the Company and its successor. 8 All endeavours in the discovery of knowledge are based on what has come before. It will become abundantly clear that I owe a huge debt of gratitude to all those Ottoman and non-Ottoman historians whose work I have made use of in my research. Any errors or omissions are of course my own. Yusuf Ali Osman August 2018 9 ABBREVIATIONS and REFERENCES The following abbreviations have been used in footnotes. Başbakanlık Arsivi (Prime Ministry Archives) BBA Deniz Müzey Arsivi (Museum of the Sea Archive) DMA Yıldız Esas Evraki (Yıldız Palace Archives) YEE The British Library BL The National Archives of the United Kingdom TNA The Salisbury Papers SP References Some of the materials used in this thesis were accessed online. In order to save space in footnotes the use of internet links have been kept to an absolute minimum. The bibliography includes URLs in all cases where information can be accessed on the internet. In references to newspaper articles, page and column numbers have been given wherever possible, however there were occasions when these were illegible and have therefore been indicated
Recommended publications
  • Barquilla De Ia Santa Maria BULLETIN of the Catholic Record Society­ Diocese of Columbus
    Barquilla de Ia Santa Maria BULLETIN of the Catholic Record Society­ Diocese of Columbus Vol XXVII, No. 9 Sept. 19: St. Januarius September, AD. 2002 Liberator and Hero of Two Continents: Januarius Aloysius MacGahan (Concluded, from Vol. XXVII, No. 8) by J. Michael Finn, State Historian Ancient Order of Hibernians The Hero Returns Home to Washington to meet with the Ohio delegation During the war, MacGahan had met Lieutenant and gave his considerable support to the Francis Vinton Greene, an American army resolution. MacGahan's wife, Barbara, was also officer, who was serving as military attache to the at the meeting with Chandler. The group found U.S. legation at St. Petersburg. Greene traveled that Chandler was very supportive and willing to with the Russian army as an observer. A fast make the unique arrangements to return friendship developed between MacGahan and MacGahan's remains to the U.S. Greene. Greene became ill with typhus and was sent to Constantinople to recover. An already The arrangements were as follows: the warship ailing MacGahan went to Constantinople to USS Quinnebang, already anchored off assist in the care of his friend. Greene recovered Constantinople, would take MacGahan's but MacGahan came down with the disease and remains as far as Lisbon, Portugal, then transfer died on June 9, 1878. Ambassadors, generals the sealed coffin to the USS Powhatan, which and fellow journalists attended his funeral, which would then bring it to New York City. was conducted by Dominican friars. MacGahan was buried in the Catholic cemetery at Feirkeni On July 30, 1884 the Powhatan steamed from on the Asian bank of the Bosporus near Lisbon Harbor bearing the remains ofMacGahan Constantinople.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Revealed.Pages
    Licensed under Velvet Tours 1 Spiridon Matei St. 032087 Bucharest, Romania Tour operator license #6617 Bulgaria revealed (10 nights) Tour Description: "Bulgaria Revealed" allows you to experience an extensive array of carefully-chosen Bulgarian cultural landmarks via a comprehensive, yet relaxed itinerary. Begin in Sofia, where you’ll stroll along the famed yellow brick road to view the capital’s major sights. Continue on to Boyana Church and the spectacular Rila Monastery before traveling to Melnik, surrounded by unusual sand formations and situated right in the heart of Bulgarian wine country. Next, tour Rozhen Monastery before stopping off in the exquisite town of Kovacevica. Take in the breathtaking natural scenery at Dospat Lake and Trigrad Gorge, then explore the mysterious Yagodinska Cave. In Batak, visit a key site in the 1876 April Uprising; in the village of Kostandovo, tour the workshop of a master traditional carpet-maker. Experience an evening walking tour in Plovdiv, then admire the abundance of traditional architecture in Koprivshtitsa. At Starosel, investigate the largest Thracian burial complex in Bulgaria. Visit the Thracian Tomb at Kazanlak, drive through the stunning Shipka Pass, and tour the incredible outdoor cultural museum at Etara. Witness the woodcarving tradition at Tryavna, shop for crafts in Veliko Tarnovo, and stroll through the architectural gem of Arbanassi. View the Madara Horseman as well as the exquisite sites at Ivanovo and Sveshtari. See the world’s oldest gold treasure at Varna, with the option to tour Balchik Palace and the Aladzha Cave Monastery—or simply spend the afternoon on the beach. Finally, enjoy a splendid day on the magnificent peninsula of Nessebar before returning to Sofia and your flight home.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Revival Culture - an Axiological Perspective in the Texts of Januarius Macgahan and Stanislas St
    English Studies at NBU, 2015 ISSN 2367-5705 (Print) Vol. 1, Issue 2, 41-54 www.esnbu.org BULGARIAN REVIVAL CULTURE - AN AXIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE IN THE TEXTS OF JANUARIUS MACGAHAN AND STANISLAS ST. CLAIR Zhivko Hristov New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract Analyzing the vocabulary and the stylistic techniques in the works of the two authors, dedicated to Bulgaria, the article aims to contribute to a change of the two seemingly contrasting attitudes in their Bulgarian reception. The first is the implicit attitude to MacGahan as a "dangerous" author whose work is not even published with its true title - "The Turkish atrocities in Bulgaria". The focus of the analysis are the passages that deal with the Bulgarian material culture and education, as well as their axiological charge. The second is the negative value-based perception of the Bulgaro-phobic texts of St. Clair, an author obviously considered ineligible for translating into Bulgarian. However, his work might be a valuable source of knowledge about the culture of the Bulgarian national revival, provided that our reception remains neutral and unaffected by his derogatory language. Key words: translation equivalence, connotation, axiology, irony, value-oriented motivation Article history: Received: 24 April 2015; Reviewed: 23 November 2015; Revised: 26 November 2015; Accepted: 21 December 2015; Published: 31 December 2015 Zhivko Hristov has an MA in Philosophy with a minor in English from St Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, Bulgaria. In 2001 – 2013, he taught English for International Relations and Psychology at Varna Free University. In 2014, he started his doctoral studies in Linguistics and Theory of Translation at New Bulgarian University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great War Began at the End of July 1914 with the Triple Entente
    ANZAC SURGEONS OF GALLIPOLI The Great War began at the end of July 1914 with the Triple Entente (Britain, France and Russia) aligned against the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria- Hungary and Italy). By December, the Alliance powers had been joined by the Ottoman Turks; and in January 1915 the Russians, pressured by German and Turkish forces in the Caucasus, asked the British to open up another front. Hamilton second from right: There is nothing certain about war except that one side won’t win. AWM H10350 A naval campaign against Turkey was devised by the British The Turkish forces Secretary of State for War Lord Kitchener and the First Sea Lord, Winston Churchill. In 1913, Enver Pasha became Minister of War and de-facto Commander in Chief of the Turkish forces. He commanded It was intended that allied ships would destroy Turkish the Ottoman Army in 1914 when they were defeated by fortifications and open up the Straits of the Dardanelles, thus the Russians at the Battle of Sarikamiş and also forged the enabling the capture of Constantinople. alliance with Germany in 1914. In March 1915 he handed over control of the Ottoman 5th army to the German General Otto Liman von Sanders. It was intended that allied Von Sanders recognised the allies could not take Constantinople without a combined land and sea attack. ships would destroy Turkish In his account of the campaign, he commented on the small force of 60,000 men under his command but noted: The fortifications British gave me four weeks before their great landing.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • Osmanlı'dan Cumhuriyet'e Bir Kurum Olarak Bahriye Vekaleti
    Hacettepe Üniversitesi Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi Enstitüsü OSMANLI’DAN CUMHURİYET’E BİR KURUM OLARAK BAHRİYE VEKÂLETİ Erdoğan ORAN Doktora Tezi ANKARA 2012 Hacettepe Üniversitesi Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi Enstitüsü OSMANLI’DAN CUMHURİYET’E BİR KURUM OLARAK BAHRİYE VEKÂLETİ Erdoğan ORAN Lisansüstü Eğitim, Öğretim ve Sınav Yönetmenliğinin Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihî Anabilim Dalı İçin Öngördüğü Doktora Tezi Olarak Hazırlanmıştır. ANKARA 2012 Doktora Tezi olarak sunduğum "Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyete Bir Kurum Olarak Bahriye Vekâleti" adlı çalışmanın, tarafımdan, bilimsel ahlak ve geleneklere aykırı düşecek bir yardıma başvurmaksızın yazıldığını ve yararlandığım eserlerin kaynakçada gösterilenlerden olduğunu, bunlara atıf yapılarak yararlanılmış olduğu belirtilir ve onurumla doğrularım. 23.12.2012 Erdoğan ORAN III H.Ü. Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü'ne, İş bu çalışma, jürimiz tarafından Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalında DOKTORA TEZİ olarak kabul edilmiştir. Başkan: Prof. Dr. Adnan Sofuoğlu ……………………… Üye: Prof. Dr. Mustafa Yılmaz ……………………… Üye: Doç. Dr. Bekir Koç ……………………… Üye: Doç. Dr. M. Derviş Kılınçkaya ……………………… Üye: Doç. Dr. Seyfi Yıldırım ……………………… Yukarıdaki imzaların, adı geçen öğretim üyelerine ait olduğunu onaylarım. 23/12/2012 Prof. Dr. Adnan SOFUOĞLU Enstitü Müdürü IV BİLDİRİM Hazırladığım tezin/raporun tamamen kendi çalışmam olduğunu ve her alıntıya kaynak gösterdiğimi taahhüt eder, tezimin/raporumun kâğıt ve elektronik kopyalarının Hacettepe Üniversitesi Atatürk
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Gunpowder Empires : Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals / Douglas E
    “Douglas Streusand has contributed a masterful comparative analysis and an up-to- S date reinterpretation of the significance of the early modern Islamic empires. This T book makes profound scholarly insights readily accessible to undergraduate stu- R dents and will be useful in world history surveys as well as more advanced courses.” —Hope Benne, Salem State College E U “Streusand creatively reexamines the military and political history and structures of the SAN Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires. He breaks down the process of transformation and makes their divergent outcomes comprehensible, not only to an audience of special- ists, but also to undergraduates and general readers. Appropriate for courses in world, early modern, or Middle Eastern history as well as the political sociology of empires.” D —Linda T. Darling, University of Arizona “Streusand is to be commended for navigating these hearty and substantial historiogra- phies to pull together an analytical textbook which will be both informative and thought provoking for the undergraduate university audience.” GUNPOWDER EMPIRES —Colin Mitchell, Dalhousie University Islamic Gunpowder Empires provides an illuminating history of Islamic civilization in the early modern world through a comparative examination of Islam’s three greatest empires: the Otto- IS mans (centered in what is now Turkey), the Safavids (in modern Iran), and the Mughals (ruling the Indian subcontinent). Author Douglas Streusand explains the origins of the three empires; compares the ideological, institutional, military, and economic contributors to their success; and L analyzes the causes of their rise, expansion, and ultimate transformation and decline. Streusand depicts the three empires as a part of an integrated international system extending from the At- lantic to the Straits of Malacca, emphasizing both the connections and the conflicts within that AMIC system.
    [Show full text]
  • Under Crescent and Star
    THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES ^^H m ' '- PI; H ; I UNDER CRESCENT AND STAR BY LIEUT. -COL. ANDKEW HAGGAKD, D.S.O. ' AUTHOR OF 'DODO AND I," TEMPEST -TORN,' ETC. WITH PORTRAIT WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCXCV DT 107.3 TO ALL MY OLD COMRADES WHO FOUGHT OR DIED IN EGYPT. ANDREW HAGGARD. NAVAL AND MILITARY CLUB, November 1895. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAGE " Learning Arabic The 1st Reserve Depot Devils in hell "- " " " Too late for the battle We don't want to work The dear old false prophet" The mosquitos' revenge on the musketeers . 1 CHAPTER II. Cairo The domestic ass Security in the city The Khedive on Tommy Atkins Bedaween on the road Parapets and pyramids Alexandria . .14 CHAPTER III. Old Egyptian army worthless How disposed of under Hicks Pasha and Valentine Baker Baker's disappointment Sir Evelyn Wood to command Constitution of the new Egyp- tian army Officers' contracts Coetlogou The Duke of Sutherland Medals and promotions Sugar-candy . 23 CHAPTER IV. Formation of the new army How officered Difficulties of lan- guage and drill The music question We conform to Ma- homedan customs Big dinners The Khedive's reception Lord Dufferin's pleasant ways . .39 Vlll CONTENTS. CHAPTER V. The Duke of Hamilton and Turner His kindness to the Shrop- shire Regiment The Khedive at Alexandria The officers visit him on accession day Ramadan begins Drilling at night We make cholera camps and cholera hospital Win- gate's good work Turner's pluck and peculiarities The epidemic awful in Cairo Death lists at dinner Devotion of .
    [Show full text]
  • Rebellion, Janissaries and Religion in Sultanic Legitimisation in the Ottoman Empire
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Istanbul Bilgi University Library Open Access “THE FURIOUS DOGS OF HELL”: REBELLION, JANISSARIES AND RELIGION IN SULTANIC LEGITIMISATION IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE UMUT DENİZ KIRCA 107671006 İSTANBUL BİLGİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH YÜKSEK LİSANS PROGRAMI PROF. DR. SURAIYA FAROQHI 2010 “The Furious Dogs of Hell”: Rebellion, Janissaries and Religion in Sultanic Legitimisation in the Ottoman Empire Umut Deniz Kırca 107671006 Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi Yard. Doç Dr. M. Erdem Kabadayı Yard. Doç Dr. Meltem Toksöz Tezin Onaylandığı Tarih : 20.09.2010 Toplam Sayfa Sayısı: 139 Anahtar Kelimeler (Türkçe) Anahtar Kelimeler (İngilizce) 1) İsyan 1) Rebellion 2) Meşruiyet 2) Legitimisation 3) Yeniçeriler 3) The Janissaries 4) Din 4) Religion 5) Güç Mücadelesi 5) Power Struggle Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü’nde Tarih Yüksek Lisans derecesi için Umut Deniz Kırca tarafından Mayıs 2010’da teslim edilen tezin özeti. Başlık: “Cehennemin Azgın Köpekleri”: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda İsyan, Yeniçeriler, Din ve Meşruiyet Bu çalışma, on sekizinci yüzyıldan ocağın kaldırılmasına kadar uzanan sürede patlak veren yeniçeri isyanlarının teknik aşamalarını irdelemektedir. Ayrıca, isyancılarla saray arasındaki meşruiyet mücadelesi, çalışmamızın bir diğer konu başlığıdır. Başkentte patlak veren dört büyük isyan bir arada değerlendirilerek, Osmanlı isyanlarının karakteristik özelliklerine ve isyanlarda izlenilen meşruiyet pratiklerine ışık tutulması hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmamızda kullandığımız metot dâhilinde, 1703, 1730, 1807 ve 1826 isyanlarını konu alan yazma eserler karşılaştırılmış, müelliflerin, eserlerini oluşturdukları süreçteki niyetleri ve getirmiş oldukları yorumlara odaklanılmıştır. Argümanların devamlılığını gözlemlemek için, 1703 ve 1730 isyanları ile 1807 ve 1826 isyanları iki ayrı grupta incelenmiştir. 1703 ve 1730 isyanlarının ortak noktası, isyancıların kendi çıkarları doğrultusunda padişaha yakın olan ve rakiplerini bu sayede eleyen politik kişilikleri hedef almalarıdır.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MODERNIZATION of the OTTOMAN NAVY DURING the REIGN of SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) By
    THE MODERNIZATION OF THE OTTOMAN NAVY DURING THE REIGN OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) by DİLARA DAL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham April, 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The main focus of this study is to examine the modernization of the Ottoman navy during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz, exploring naval administration, education, and technology. Giving a summary of the transformation of shipbuilding technologies and bureaucratic institutions of the Ottoman naval forces between 1808 and 1861, it analyses the structure of the Ottoman navy, its level of development in comparison to previous periods of time, and the condition of the vessels making up the naval fleet from 1861 to 1876. It also intends to evaluate the character of existing administrative structures at the outset of Abdülaziz’s reign in 1861 and the nature of subsequent changes, including structural reorganization of the Imperial Naval Arsenal, the Ministry of Marine, and the Naval Academy, as well as advancements in military training and seafaring; all within the context of the impact of these changes on the military, political, and economic condition of the Empire during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodora Dragostinova
    Theodora Dragostinova Department of History Phone: 614-292-1602 The Ohio State University Fax: 614-292-8666 230 West 17th Avenue Email: [email protected] Columbus, OH 43210 ______________________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION 2005 Ph.D. in History, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2000 M.A. in History, University of Florida 1998 B.A. in History and Archaeology, University of Athens, Greece 1993 Certificate, Modern Greek Language Center, University of Athens, Greece 1991 Undergraduate studies, Department of History, University of Sofia, Bulgaria, 1991-1992 ______________________________________________________________________________ POSITIONS 2018 Visiting Fellow, Center for Advanced Study, Sofia, Bulgaria 2015 Visiting Fellow, Institute for Southeast European Studies, Regensburg, Germany 2012~ Associate Professor of History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 2007-2012 Assistant Professor of History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 2006-2007 Visiting Assistant Professor of History, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama ____________________________________________________________________________ PUBLICATIONS Monographs and Edited Volumes 2011 Between Two Motherlands: Nationality and Emigration among the Greeks of Bulgaria, 1900-1949 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011). Honorable mention, The Joseph Rothschild Prize in Nationalism and Ethnic Studies, Association for the Study of Nationalities and Harriman Institute, Columbia University . Honorable mention, The Edmund Keeley Book Prize, Modern Greek Studies Association . Past President Book Bronze Award, Association for Borderlands Studies Theodora Dragostinova Page 2 of 23 2016 Beyond Mosque, Church, and State: Alternative Narratives of the Nation in the Balkans (co-edited with Yana Hashamova) (New York & Budapest: Central European University Press, 2016). Refereed Journal Articles and Book Chapters 2018 “Introduction. Beyond the Iron Curtain: Eastern Europe and the Global Cold War,” Slavic Review, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Corsairs in the Central Mediterranean and the Slave Trade in the 16Th Century
    SAĠM ANIL KARZEK ANIL SAĠM MEDITERRANEAN AND THE SLAVE TRADE SLAVE AND THE IN MEDITERRANEAN OTTOMAN CORSAIRS IN THE CENTRAL CORSAIRS THE IN OTTOMAN OTTOMAN CORSAIRS IN THE CENTRAL THE 16TH 16TH THE MEDITERRANEAN AND THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE 16TH CENTURY CENTURY A Master‟s Thesis by SAĠM ANIL KARZEK Department of History Ġhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara Bilkent 2021 University August 2021 To my beloved family OTTOMAN CORSAIRS IN THE CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN AND THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE 16TH CENTURY The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of Ġhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by SAĠM ANIL KARZEK In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY ĠHSAN DOĞRAMACI BĠLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of History. Prof. Dr. Özer Ergenç Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of History. I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of History Prof. Dr. Mehmet Veli Seyitdanlıoğlu Examining Committee Member Approval of the Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Refet Soykan Gürkaynak Director ABSTRACT OTTOMAN CORSAIRS IN THE CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN AND THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE 16TH CENTURY Karzek, Saim Anıl M.A., Department of History Supervisor: Özer Ergenç August 2021 This thesis aims to analyze the Ottoman corsairs and their role in the slave trade in the 16th century Mediterranean, and it concentrates on the corsair activity around the central Mediterranean during Suleiman I's reign.
    [Show full text]