DOCSLIB.ORG

Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Published on 30 August 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Published on 30 August 2014 Issue 23, Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Published on 30 August 2014. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) AustralasianAustralasian JournalJournal ofof HerpetologyHerpetology Hoser 2014 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 22:2-8. Available online at www.herp.net Contents Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reservedContents onon pagepage 22 2 AustralasianAustralasian Journal Journal of ofHerpetology Herpetology Issue 23, 30 August 2014 Contents A long overdue taxonomic rearrangement of the New Guinea Crowned Snakes, currently referred to the genus Aspidomorphus Fitzinger, 1843 (Serpentes:Elapidae). ...... Raymond T. Hoser, 3-9. Smythkukri hunneangorum a new species of Kukri Snake from Cambodia (Serpentes: Oligodonini: Smythkukri; Geddykukrius). ... ...Raymond T. Hoser, 10-12. New snake taxa from Australasia, Asia and Africa. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 13-21. Tidying up Death Adder taxonomy (Serpentes: Elapidae: Acanthophis): including descriptions of new subspecies and the first ever key to identify all recognized species and subspecies within the genus. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 22-34. From a history of genus mergers to an overdue break-up: A new and sensible taxonomy for the Asiatic Wolf Snakes Lycodon Boie, 1826 (Serpentes: Colubridae). ... Raymond T. Hoser, 35-51. Korniliostyphlops a new genus of Blindsnake from the island of Socotra. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 52-53. A long overdue taxonomic rearrangement of the Uromastycinae (Squamata: Sauria: Agamidae). ... Raymond T. Hoser, 54-64. All photos in AJH Issues 1-23 are by Raymond Hoser. Australasian Journal of Herpetology Publishes original research in printed form in relation to reptiles, other fauna and related matters, including the subjects of classification, ecology, public interest, legal, captivity, exposure of frauds, “academic misconduct”, etc. It is a peer reviewed printed journal published in hard copy for permenant public scientific record in accordance with the Zoological Code (Ride et al. 1999), with a sizeable print run and has a global audience. Full details of acquiring copies, either printed or in identical form online, editorial policies, publication procedure, author submission guidelines, peer review guidelines, legal matters, advantages of publication in this journal and the like can be found by following links from: http://www.herp.net Published by Kotabi Pty Ltd PO Box 599 ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) Doncaster, Victoria, 3108. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Hoser 2013 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 19:3-8. Australia. Copyright. All rights reserved. Online journals (this issue) do Availablenot appear for online a month at after www.herp.net the actual and listed publication date of the printed journals. MinimumCopyright- print run Kotabi of first Publishingprintings is always - All at rightsleast fifty reserved hard copies. Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 23:3-9. ISSN 1836-5698 3(Print) Published 30 August 2014. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A long overdue taxonomic rearrangement of the New Guinea Crowned Snakes, currently referred to the genus Aspidomorphus Fitzinger, 1843 (Serpentes:Elapidae). RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3114, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 2 November 2013, Accepted 1 December 2013, Published 30 August 2014. ABSTRACT As generally recognized at present, the principally New Guinea genus Aspidomorphus Fitzinger, 1843 consists of three morphologically similar species, all found in the New Guinea region. Morphological studies, notably that of McDowell and Cogger (1967) have shown the three nominate forms to be divergent in terms of conservative traits such as hemipene morphology. Regional forms of these are also sufficiently differentiated to warrant taxonomic recognition. Recent molecular studies, including that of Metzger et al. (2010) have further shown each of the three widely recognized species of Aspidomorphus to be composite along the same lines as indicated by the morphological data published by McDowall (1967). Metzger et al. (2010) also showed that the three widely recognized species of the present time, each consist of widely divergent lineages, warranting individual taxonomic recognition at the genus level. Following on from these past studies and merging the results, this paper takes a conservative position and splits Aspidomorphus into three genera, two being named and defined for the first time in accordance with the Zoological Code (Ride et al. 1999). Furthermore, Aspidomorphus muelleri (Schlegel, 1837) as presently recognized is divided into four species, two formally named for the first time; as well as two new subspecies, both formally named for the first time; Aspidomorphus schlegeli (Günther, 1872) is divided into two species, one formally named for the first time and Aspidomorphus lineaticollis (Werner, 1903) is divided into six species, with four formally named for the first time. The subtribe Aspidomorphina Hoser, 2012, is herein elevated to full tribe status, thereby becoming Aspidomorphini tribe nov. Keywords: Taxonomy; Australasia; New Guinea; Indonesia; Papua; Irian Jaya; Milne Bay; Elapidae; Micropechiini; Aspidomorphini; Aspidomorphina; genus; Aspidomorphus; species; muelleri; schlegeli; lineaticollis; lineatus; interruptus; new genera; Walmsleyus; Pilgerus; new species; coggeri; keneficki; anstisae; assangei; nardellai; macki; mooreae; new subspecies; macdowelli; tamisi. INTRODUCTION As generally recognized at present, the principally New Guinea However, recent molecular studies, including that of Metzger et genus Aspidomorphus Fitzinger, 1843 consists of three al. (2010) have also shown each of the three widely recognized morphologically similar species, all found in the New Guinea species of Aspidomorphus to be composite and along the same region. Morphological studies, notably that of McDowell and lines as indicated by the morphological data published by Cogger (1967) have shown the three nominate forms to be McDowall and Cogger in 1967. Metzger et al. (2010) also divergent in terms of conservative traits such as hemipene showed that the three widely recognized species of the present morphology and scalation. time, each consist of widely divergent lineages, warranting individual taxonomic recognition at the genus level. Regional forms of these are also sufficiently differentiated to warrant taxonomic recognition. Following on from these past studies of both McDowall and Cogger (1967) and Metzger et al. (2010) as well as other lesser History has shown McDowall to have failed to realize the studies of these snakes, including my own, as well as relevant taxonomic significance of differences in morphology of snakes studies of other New Guinea taxa (e.g. Zug 2004) and merging as first identified in his landmark taxonomic studies of the latter the results, this paper takes a conservative position and splits twentieth century. Hoser 2014 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 23:3-9. Available online at www.herp.net Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved 4 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Aspidomorphus into three genera, two being named and defined (2010), O’Shea (1996), Parker (1936), Pyron et al. (2013), Ruiter for the first time in accordance with the Zoological Code (Ride et (1960), Schlegel (1837), Tiedemann and Grillitsch (1999), al. 1999). Werner (1899, 1903, 1925), Williams and Parker (1964), Worrell It should be noted that in terms of divergence, these newly (1961, 1963a, 1963b) and sources cited therein. named genera are considerably more divergent than other well In view of the findings of Metzger et al. (2010) and Pyron et al. recognized Australasian elapid genera such as the genera (2013), the subtribe Aspidomorphina Hoser, 2012, as defined by Tropidechis Günther, 1863, Notechis Boulenger, 1896 and Hoser (2012), is herein elevated to full tribe status, thereby Austrelaps Worrell 1963, with all three as a group being far less becoming Aspidomorphini tribe nov. by effectively adopting the divergent. same diagnosis. The subtribe Aspidomorphina should be also Furthermore, Aspidomorphus muelleri (Schlegel, 1837) as maintained to allow for the inevitable need for use when dealing presently recognized is divided into four species, two formally with fossil material. named for the first time; as well as two new subspecies, both TRIBE ASPIDOMORPHINI TRIBE NOV. formally named for the first time; Aspidomorphus schlegeli (Terminal Taxon: Aspidomorphus muelleri) (Günther, 1872) is divided into two species, one formally named Diagnosis: Separated from all other Australasian and for the first time and Aspidomorphus lineaticollis (Werner, 1903) Melanesian land dwelling (non-sea snake) elapids and others in is divided into six species, with four formally named for the first the tribe Micropechiini by the following suite of characters: time. Snakes of moderate to slender build, usually around 400 mm in McDowall and Cogger (1967) did an excellent job of defining total length as adults and never more than 650 mm as adults; differences between the various taxa identified within this paper head flattened and slightly distinct from the neck which is with little need to add further diagnostic material in order to noticeably narrower but not unduly narrow; shortish tail, small to differentiate the relevant taxa. As it happens, there is strong medium sized eye with a vertically elliptical pupil, although this is merit in publishing a species diagnosis that is both relatively
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Occurrence and Distribution of Snake Species in Balochistan Province, Pakistan
    Pakistan J. Zool., pp 1-4, 2021. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20181111091150 Short Communication Occurrence and Distribution of Snake Species in Balochistan Province, Pakistan Saeed Ahmed Essote1, Asim Iqbal1, Muhammad Kamran Taj2*, Asmatullah Kakar1, Imran Taj2, Shahab-ud-Din Kakar1 and Imran Ali 3,4* 1Department of Zoology, University of Balochistan, Quetta 2Center for Advanced Studies in Vaccinology and Biotechnology, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan. 3Institute of Biochemistry, University of Balochistan, Quetta 4 Plant Biomass Utilization Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Article Information Thailand. Received 11 November 2018 Revised 11 October 2020 Accepted 10 December 2020 ABSTRACT Available online 28 April 2021 Authors’ Contribution The current study was conducted in Zhob, Quetta, Sibi, Kalat, Naseer Abad and Makran Divisions of SAE carried the research with the Balochistan Province. A total of 619 snake specimens representing 6 families, 20 genera and 37 species help of other authors and wrote were collected. The family wise representation among collected specimens has been Boidae (4.6%), the manuscript. AI, MKT and IT Leptotyphlopidae (7.5%), Typhlopidae (10.3%), Elapidae (11.7%), Viperidae (13.4%) and Colubridae helped in the experimental work. AK (52.5%). The percentage of family Boidae, Typhlopidae, Elapidae and Leptotyphlopidae were high in and SDK classified the species and Sibi Division while family Viperidae and Colubridae were dominant in Quetta Division. The family proofread the article. IA helped in arranging contents of the article. Colubridae has been the most dominant in the Province, having ten genera viz., Boiga (6.8%) Coluber (10.1%), Eirenis (2.5%), Lycodon (3.5%), Lytorhynchus (6.1%), Oligodon (4.7%), Natrix (1.7%), (7.5%), Key words Ptyas (2.9 %) Spalerosophis (6.3%) and Psammophis.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Lycodon)
    Zoologica Scripta Multilocus phylogeny reveals unexpected diversification patterns in Asian wolf snakes (genus Lycodon) CAMERON D. SILER,CARL H. OLIVEROS,ANSSI SANTANEN &RAFE M. BROWN Submitted: 6 September 2012 Siler, C. D., Oliveros, C. H., Santanen, A., Brown, R. M. (2013). Multilocus phylogeny Accepted: 8 December 2012 reveals unexpected diversification patterns in Asian wolf snakes (genus Lycodon). —Zoologica doi:10.1111/zsc.12007 Scripta, 42, 262–277. The diverse group of Asian wolf snakes of the genus Lycodon represents one of many poorly understood radiations of advanced snakes in the superfamily Colubroidea. Outside of three species having previously been represented in higher-level phylogenetic analyses, nothing is known of the relationships among species in this unique, moderately diverse, group. The genus occurs widely from central to Southeast Asia, and contains both widespread species to forms that are endemic to small islands. One-third of the diversity is found in the Philippine archipelago. Both morphological similarity and highly variable diagnostic characters have contributed to confusion over species-level diversity. Additionally, the placement of the genus among genera in the subfamily Colubrinae remains uncertain, although previous studies have supported a close relationship with the genus Dinodon. In this study, we provide the first estimate of phylogenetic relationships within the genus Lycodon using a new multi- locus data set. We provide statistical tests of monophyly based on biogeographic, morpho- logical and taxonomic hypotheses. With few exceptions, we are able to reject many of these hypotheses, indicating a need for taxonomic revisions and a reconsideration of the group's biogeography. Mapping of color patterns on our preferred phylogenetic tree suggests that banded and blotched types have evolved on multiple occasions in the history of the genus, whereas the solid-color (and possibly speckled) morphotype color patterns evolved only once.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    First record of Ahaetulla mycterizans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Reptilia, Squamata, Colubridae) from Sumatra, Indonesia, with an expanded defi nition Aurélien MIRALLES Technical University of Braunschweig, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, Spielmannstrasse 8, D-38106 Braunschweig (Germany) [email protected] Patrick DAVID Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, UMR 7202 CNRS Origine, Structure et Évolution de la Biodiversité, case postale 30, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] Miralles A. & David P. 2010. — First record of Ahaetulla mycterizans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Reptilia, Squamata, Colubridae) from Sumatra, Indonesia, with an expanded defi nition. Zoosystema 32 (3) : 449-456. ABSTRACT A specimen of the colubrid genus Ahaetulla Link, 1807 collected in 2002 in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia, proves to be the fi rst record of Ahaetulla mycterizans (Linnaeus, 1758) for this Indonesian island. Th is species was previ- KEY WORDS ously known from Java, West Malaysia and southern Peninsular Th ailand. Th e Reptilia, Serpentes, discovery of this specimen constitutes an opportunity to redefi ne and illustrate Colubridae, this rare and poorly known species and to compare it with the more common Ahaetulla mycterizans, Ahaetulla prasina (Boie, 1827). Additionally, an identifi cation key of the species Ahaetulla prasina, Sumatra, of Ahaetulla from the Indo-Malayan Region is proposed. Th is addition brings Indonesia. to 134 the number of snake species currently known from Sumatra Island. RÉSUMÉ Première mention d’Ahaetulla mycterizans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Reptilia, Squamata, Colubridae) pour Sumatra, Indonésie, avec une redéfi nition de cette espèce. Un spécimen du genre de couleuvre Ahaetulla Link, 1807, collecté en 2002 dans la province de Jambi, île de Sumatra, Indonésie, représente la première mention confi rmée de Ahaetulla mycterizans (Linnaeus, 1758) sur cette île d’Indonésie.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Live Reptiles, Its Impact on Wild Populations, and the Role of the European Market
    BIOC-06813; No of Pages 17 Biological Conservation xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bioc Review Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market Mark Auliya a,⁎,SandraAltherrb, Daniel Ariano-Sanchez c, Ernst H. Baard d,CarlBrownd,RafeM.Browne, Juan-Carlos Cantu f,GabrieleGentileg, Paul Gildenhuys d, Evert Henningheim h, Jürgen Hintzmann i, Kahoru Kanari j, Milivoje Krvavac k, Marieke Lettink l, Jörg Lippert m, Luca Luiselli n,o, Göran Nilson p, Truong Quang Nguyen q, Vincent Nijman r, James F. Parham s, Stesha A. Pasachnik t,MiguelPedronou, Anna Rauhaus v,DannyRuedaCórdovaw, Maria-Elena Sanchez x,UlrichScheppy, Mona van Schingen z,v, Norbert Schneeweiss aa, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto ab, Ruchira Somaweera ac, Emerson Y. Sy ad,OguzTürkozanae, Sabine Vinke af, Thomas Vinke af,RajuVyasag, Stuart Williamson ah,1,ThomasZieglerai,aj a Department Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Conservation (UFZ), Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany b Pro Wildlife, Kidlerstrasse 2, 81371 Munich, Germany c Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle de, Guatemala d Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, South Africa e Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA f Bosques de Cerezos 112, C.P. 11700 México D.F., Mexico g Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy h Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Terrestrial Australo-Papuan Elapid Snakes (Subfamily Hydrophiinae) Based on Cytochrome B and 16S Rrna Sequences J
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Vol. 10, No. 1, August, pp. 67–81, 1998 ARTICLE NO. FY970471 Phylogenetic Relationships of Terrestrial Australo-Papuan Elapid Snakes (Subfamily Hydrophiinae) Based on Cytochrome b and 16S rRNA Sequences J. Scott Keogh,*,†,1 Richard Shine,* and Steve Donnellan† *School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia; and †Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia Received April 24, 1997; revised September 4, 1997 quence data support many of the conclusions reached Phylogenetic relationships among the venomous Aus- by earlier studies using other types of data, but addi- tralo-Papuan elapid snake radiation remain poorly tional information will be needed before the phylog- resolved, despite the application of diverse data sets. eny of the Australian elapids can be fully resolved. To examine phylogenetic relationships among this ௠ 1998 Academic Press enigmatic group, portions of the cytochrome b and 16S Key Words: mitochondrial DNA; cytochrome b; 16S rRNA mitochondrial DNA genes were sequenced from rRNA; reptile; snake; elapid; sea snake; Australia; New 19 of the 20 terrestrial Australian genera and 6 of the 7 Guinea; Pacific; Asia; biogeography. terrestrial Melanesian genera, plus a sea krait (Lati- cauda) and a true sea snake (Hydrelaps). These data clarify several significant issues in elapid phylogeny. First, Melanesian elapids form sister groups to Austra- INTRODUCTION lian species, indicating that the ancestors of the Austra- lian radiation came via Asia, rather than representing The diverse, cosmopolitan, and medically important a relict Gondwanan radiation. Second, the two major elapid snakes are a monophyletic clade of approxi- groups of sea snakes (sea kraits and true sea snakes) mately 300 species and 61 genera (Golay et al., 1993) represent independent invasions of the marine envi- primarily defined by their unique venom delivery sys- ronment.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 25 No. 1 March, 2000 H a M a D R Y a D V O L 25
    NO.1 25 M M A A H D A H O V D A Y C R R L 0 0 0 2 VOL. 25NO.1 MARCH, 2000 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% HAMADRYAD Vol. 25. No. 1. March 2000 Date of issue: 31 March 2000 ISSN 0972-205X Contents A. E. GREER & D. G. BROADLEY. Six characters of systematic importance in the scincid lizard genus Mabuya .............................. 1–12 U. MANTHEY & W. DENZER. Description of a new genus, Hypsicalotes gen. nov. (Sauria: Agamidae) from Mt. Kinabalu, North Borneo, with remarks on the generic identity of Gonocephalus schultzewestrumi Urban, 1999 ................13–20 K. VASUDEVAN & S. K. DUTTA. A new species of Rhacophorus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats, India .................21–28 O. S. G. PAUWELS, V. WALLACH, O.-A. LAOHAWAT, C. CHIMSUNCHART, P. DAVID & M. J. COX. Ethnozoology of the “ngoo-how-pak-pet” (Serpentes: Typhlopidae) in southern peninsular Thailand ................29–37 S. K. DUTTA & P. RAY. Microhyla sholigari, a new species of microhylid frog (Anura: Microhylidae) from Karnataka, India ....................38–44 Notes R. VYAS. Notes on distribution and breeding ecology of Geckoella collegalensis (Beddome, 1870) ..................................... 45–46 A. M. BAUER. On the identity of Lacerta tjitja Ljungh 1804, a gecko from Java .....46–49 M. F. AHMED & S. K. DUTTA. First record of Polypedates taeniatus (Boulenger, 1906) from Assam, north-eastern India ...................49–50 N. M. ISHWAR. Melanobatrachus indicus Beddome, 1878, resighted at the Anaimalai Hills, southern India .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    HAMADRYAD Vol. 27. No. 2. August, 2003 Date of issue: 31 August, 2003 ISSN 0972-205X CONTENTS T. -M. LEONG,L.L.GRISMER &MUMPUNI. Preliminary checklists of the herpetofauna of the Anambas and Natuna Islands (South China Sea) ..................................................165–174 T.-M. LEONG & C-F. LIM. The tadpole of Rana miopus Boulenger, 1918 from Peninsular Malaysia ...............175–178 N. D. RATHNAYAKE,N.D.HERATH,K.K.HEWAMATHES &S.JAYALATH. The thermal behaviour, diurnal activity pattern and body temperature of Varanus salvator in central Sri Lanka .........................179–184 B. TRIPATHY,B.PANDAV &R.C.PANIGRAHY. Hatching success and orientation in Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) at Rushikulya Rookery, Orissa, India ......................................185–192 L. QUYET &T.ZIEGLER. First record of the Chinese crocodile lizard from outside of China: report on a population of Shinisaurus crocodilurus Ahl, 1930 from north-eastern Vietnam ..................193–199 O. S. G. PAUWELS,V.MAMONEKENE,P.DUMONT,W.R.BRANCH,M.BURGER &S.LAVOUÉ. Diet records for Crocodylus cataphractus (Reptilia: Crocodylidae) at Lake Divangui, Ogooué-Maritime Province, south-western Gabon......................................................200–204 A. M. BAUER. On the status of the name Oligodon taeniolatus (Jerdon, 1853) and its long-ignored senior synonym and secondary homonym, Oligodon taeniolatus (Daudin, 1803) ........................205–213 W. P. MCCORD,O.S.G.PAUWELS,R.BOUR,F.CHÉROT,J.IVERSON,P.C.H.PRITCHARD,K.THIRAKHUPT, W. KITIMASAK &T.BUNDHITWONGRUT. Chitra burmanica sensu Jaruthanin, 2002 (Testudines: Trionychidae): an unavailable name ............................................................214–216 V. GIRI,A.M.BAUER &N.CHATURVEDI. Notes on the distribution, natural history and variation of Hemidactylus giganteus Stoliczka, 1871 ................................................217–221 V. WALLACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Reassessment of the Common Indian Wolf Snakes Lycodon Aulicus (Linnaeus, 1758) Complex (Squamata: Serpentes: Colubridae)
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 67 (1): 25–36 May 2018 Taxonomic reassessment of the Common Indian Wolf Snakes Lycodon aulicus (Linnaeus, 1758) complex (Squamata: Serpentes: Colubridae) Sumaithangi Rajagopalan Ganesh1 & Gernot Vogel2* 1Chennai Snake Park, Chennai - 600 022, Tamil Nadu, India 2Society for Southeast Asian Herpetology, Im Sand 3, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We studied the population systematics of the group of the Common Indian wolf snake (Lycodon aulicus s. lat.) based on a series of specimens from throughout most of their geographic range. Two discrete species-groups could be discerned based on head dimensions, collar band pattern, hemipenal morphology and frontal-preocular-prefrontal-su- proacular scale contact configurations (with outliers). The first one contains specimens agreeing with the morphology of the name-bearing type of Lycodon aulicus; the other includes specimens agreeing with the morphology of Lycodon anamallensis (so far within the synonymy of L. aulicus), which is here revalidated at species-level. We formally report the presence of the presumed Sri Lankan endemic Lycodon osmanhilli group taxa in the Indian peninsula and we synonymise L. osmanhilli with the senior nomen L. anamallensis which is based on an Indian specimen. Our series of specimens show clear and sometimes non-overlapping geographical variations in ventral, subcaudal scale counts and relative tail lengths within both species. Key words. Collar band, head dimension, Indian peninsula, Sri Lanka, Wolf Snakes. INTRODUCTION trix aulica. Duméril et al. (1854) transferred Natrix auli- ca to the genus Lycodon, as Lycodon aulicum. The common Indian wolf snake Lycodon aulicus (Lin- Cantor (1839) described Lycodon subfuscus based on naeus, 1758) is a non-venomous, mainly nocturnal, ovip- a single specimen from Bengal, in north-eastern India.
    [Show full text]
  • Uromastyx Ocellata Lichtenstein, 1823
    AC22 Doc. 10.2 Annex 6e Uromastyx ocellata Lichtenstein, 1823 FAMILY: Agamidae COMMON NAMES: Eyed Dabb Lizard, Ocellated Mastigure, Ocellated Uromastyx, Eyed Spiny-tailed Lizard, Smooth-eared (English); Fouette-queue Ocellé (French); Lagarto de Cola Espinosa Ocelado (Spanish) GLOBAL CONSERVATION STATUS: Currently being assessed by IUCN Global Reptile Assessment. SIGNIFICANT TRADE REVIEW FOR: Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan Range States selected for review Range Exports* Urgent, Comments States (1994-2003) possible or least concern Djibouti 0 Least concern No trade reported Egypt 4 528 Least concern Export of species banned since 1992. No exports recorded since 1995. Eritrea 0 Least concern No trade reported Ethiopia 477 Least concern Ethiopia’s CITES Authorities confirm its presence. Trade levels low. Export quotas in place based on population surveys. Somalia 0 Least concern No trade reported Sudan 11,702 Least concern Main exporter; low levels of trade (<3000 yr-1). No systematic population monitoring in place to determine non-detriment. SUMMARY Uromastyx ocellata, commonly known in the pet trade as the Ocellated Spiny-tailed Lizard, is recorded from Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Somalia and Sudan. Ethiopia’s CITES Scientific Authority also report that the species is found in that country. It is found in wadis in rocky mountainous desert with acacia trees. U. ocellata is reportedly fairly common in some range States, although regarded as declining in some areas. If it occurs at population densities comparable to those of other Uromastyx species, its population is likely to number at minimum several hundred thousand individuals. Reported exports of U. ocellata during the period 1994-2003 were mainly from Sudan (11,702) and Egypt (4,528) with Ethiopia also exporting specimens.
    [Show full text]