Crisisscapesconferencebookweb(1)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Waste Transfer Station (SMA) for Athens and Neighboring Municipalities” in the Area of Eleonas
1 Kifissia, July 18th, 2019 HELECTOR is the contractor of the new “Waste Transfer Station (SMA) for Athens and Neighboring Municipalities” in the area of Eleonas The agreement for the project of the “Establishment of the Waste Transfer Station (SMA) for Athens and Neighboring Municipalities” in the area of Eleonas (Western Attica) has been signed by the Athens Municipality (Contracting Authority), the Special Inter-Collective Association of the Prefecture of Attica (E.D.S.N.A.) (Owner of the Project) and HELECTOR S.A., as Contractor. The total contract price is 10,839,005.15€ plus VAT and includes the design, construction and delivery in full operation of the Waste Transfer Station (SMA) in the area of Eleonas, in Western Attica, at a property of 20 acres approximately, owned by E.D.S.N.A. The Central Waste Transfer Station (SMA) has a key role in the basic infrastructure of the Regional Plan for the Management of Solid Waste in Attica, following the up-to-date legal and social requirements. The local waste collection systems’ process will be upgraded, thus creating environmental benefit, by limiting the circulation of waste collection vehicles, by reducing the aerial emissions and by supporting the effective operation of the landfill. In addition, the new Station (SMA) will adapt to the requirements of the Regional Plan for the Management of Solid Waste (PESDA) of Attica. With the opportunity of HELECTOR’s selection as a Contractor for the project, the CEO of HELECTOR, Mr. Haris Sofianos stated: «We are very pleased to undertake one more project towards the integrated solid waste management in Attica, supporting the evolution of the wider Regional Plan for the sector’s modernization. -
The Government of Greece Cycle 2009
25/05/09 RAP/Cha/GR/XIX(2009) EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 19th report on the implementation of the European Social Charter and 5th report on the implementation of the 1988 Additional Protocol submitted by THE GOVERNMENT OF GREECE (Articles 3, 12 and 13 for the period 01/01/2005 – 31/12/2007; Articles 11, 14 and Article 4 of the Additional Protocol for the period 01/01/2003 – 31/12/2007) _________ Report registered at the Secretariat on 19/05/2009 CYCLE 2009 EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 19th GREEK REPORT ARTICLES 3, 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 4 OF THE ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL Reference period 2005-2007 (for articles 3, 12, 13) 2003-2007 (for articles 11, 14, 4) ATHENS MAY 2009 Table of Contents Article 3 The right to safe and healthy working conditions.....................................4 Paragraph 1 .............................................................. 4 Paragraph 2 .............................................................14 Paragraph 3 .............................................................19 Article 11 The right to protection of health.............................................................20 Paragraph 1 .............................................................20 Paragraph 2 .............................................................34 Paragraph 3 .............................................................39 Article 12 The right to social secutity.......................................................................62 Paragraph 1 .............................................................62 Paragraph 2 .............................................................70 -
A Hydrogeotechnical Integrated System for Water Resources 3 Management of Attica – Greece
A Hydrog eotechnical Integrated System for Water Resources Management of Attica – Greece Dr. Costas Sachpazis , M.Sc., Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Geotechnology and Environmental Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of West Macedonia, Koila 50100, Kozani, Greece. e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Odysseus Manoliadis, M.Sc., Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Geotechnology and Environmental Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of West Macedonia, Koila 50100, Kozani, Greece. e-mail: [email protected] Athina Baronos , M.Sc. , Ph.D. Candidate Senior Lecturer, Department of Industrial Engineering and Design, Technological Educati onal Institute of West Macedonia, Koila 50100, Kozani, Greece. e-mail: [email protected] Chrysanthy Tsapraili , M.Sc. Assisting Laboratory Lecturer, Faculty of Management and Economy, Technological Educationa l Institute of West Macedonia, Koila 50100, Kozani, Greece. e-mail: [email protected] Abstract : In this paper an information management system used in Attica Greece that combines modeling with the integrated management of water, sewerage and storm water infrastructure is presented. From this information management system there are proposed certain public works that are grouped in two categories, i.e. works that are needed for the entire Attica district and have a general character for the whole region (1 st category works) and then, works that are specifically needed for every particular and individual municipality (2 nd category works). The first category consists of: Collection and Treatment of the Used Water Works, and Reuse of at least a portion of the Treated Wastewater Works, and the second category consists of: Flood Protection through Stormwater Storage Works, Artificial Recharge of Groundwater Aquifers Works, 1 2 Dr. -
The Athens Earthquake (7 September 1999): Intensity Distribution and Controlling Factors
Engineering Geology 59 (2001) 297±311 www.elsevier.nl/locate/enggeo The Athens earthquake (7 September 1999): intensity distribution and controlling factors E. Lekkas* Department of Geology, University of Athens, Panepistimioupoli Zografou, 15784 Athens, Greece Received 20 June 2000; accepted for publication 14 December 2000 Abstract The Athens earthquake, Ms 5:9, that occurred on 7th September 1999 with epicenter located at the southern ¯ank of Mount Parnitha (Greece, Attiki) according to instrumental data, is attributed to the reactivation of an ESE±WNW south- dipping fault without sur®cial expression. The earthquake caused a large number of casualties and extensive damage within an extended area. Damage displayed signi®cant differentiation from place to place, as well as a peculiar geographic distribution. Based on geological, tectonic and morphological characteristics of the affected area and on the elaboration of damage recordings for intensity evaluation, it can be safely suggested that intensity distribution was the result of the combination of a number of parameters both on macro and microscale. On the macroscale, the parameters are the strike of the seismogenic fault, seismic wave directivity effects and to an old NNE±SSW tectonic structure, and they are also responsible for the maximum intensity arrangement in two perpendicular directions ESE±WNW and NNE±SSW. On the microscale, site foundation formations, old tectonic structures buried under recent formations and morphology are the parameters that differentiated intensities within the affected area. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Athens; Earthquake; Intensity; Distribution; Tectonics; Fault 1. Introduction collapsed, including industrial installations, causing 140 deaths. The strongly affected area is inhabited On September 7, 1999 at 14:56 local time (11:56 by about 1 million people, 10% of whom are GMT), the City of Athens was rocked by an earth- estimated to be homeless. -
Networking UNDERGROUND Archaeological and Cultural Sites: the CASE of the Athens Metro
ing”. Indeed, since that time, the archaeological NETWORKING UNDERGROUND treasures found in other underground spaces are very often displayed in situ and in continu- ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ity with the cultural and archaeological spaces of the surface (e.g. in the building of the Central CULTURAL SITES: THE CASE Bank of Greece). In this context, the present paper presents OF THE ATHENS METRO the case of the Athens Metro and the way that this common use of the underground space can have an alternative, more sophisticated use, Marilena Papageorgiou which can also serve to enhance the city’s iden- tity. Furthermore, the case aims to discuss the challenges for Greek urban planners regarding the way that the underground space of Greece, so rich in archaeological artifacts, can become part of an integrated and holistic spatial plan- INTRODUCTION: THE USE OF UNDERGROUND SPACE IN GREECE ning process. Greece is a country that doesn’t have a very long tradition either in building high ATHENS IN LAYERS or in using its underground space for city development – and/or other – purposes. In fact, in Greece, every construction activity that requires digging, boring or tun- Key issues for the Athens neling (public works, private building construction etc) is likely to encounter an- Metropolitan Area tiquities even at a shallow depth. Usually, when that occurs, the archaeological 1 · Central Athens 5 · Piraeus authorities of the Ministry of Culture – in accordance with the Greek Archaeologi- Since 1833, Athens has been the capital city of 2 · South Athens 6 · Islands 3 · North Athens 7 · East Attica 54 cal Law 3028 - immediately stop the work and start to survey the area of interest. -
UN/LOCODE) for Greece
United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LOCODE) for Greece N.B. To check the official, current database of UN/LOCODEs see: https://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html UN/LOCODE Location Name State Functionality Status Coordinatesi GR 2NR Neon Rysion 54 Road terminal; Recognised location 4029N 02259E GR 5ZE Zervochórion 32 Road terminal; Recognised location 3924N 02033E GR 6TL Lití 54 Road terminal; Recognised location 4044N 02258E GR 9OP Dhílesi 03 Road terminal; Recognised location 3821N 02340E GR A8A Anixi A1 Road terminal; Recognised location 3808N 02352E GR AAI Ágioi Anárgyroi 31 Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3908N 02101E GR AAR Acharnes A1 Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3805N 02344E GR AAS Ágios Athanásios 54 Road terminal; Recognised location 4043N 02243E GR ABD Abdera 72 Road terminal; Recognised location 4056N 02458E GR ABO Ambelókipoi Road terminal; Recognised location 4028N 02118E GR ACH Akharnaí A1 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Approved by national 3805N 02344E government agency GR ACL Achladi Port; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC 3853N 02249E GR ADA Amaliada 14 Road terminal; Recognised location 3748N 02121E GR ADI Livádia 31 Road terminal; Recognised location 3925N 02106E GR ADK Ano Diakopto 13 Road terminal; Recognised location 3808N 02214E GR ADL Adamas Milos 82 Port; Request under consideration 3643N 02426E GR ADO Áhdendron 54 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 4040N 02236E GR AEF Agia Efimia Port; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC 3818N -
Vassilis Arapoglou,* Thomas Maloutas**
The Greek Review of Social Research, special issue 136 C´, 2011, 135-155 Vassilis Arapoglou,* Thomas Maloutas** SEGREGATION, INEQUALITY AND MARGINALITY IN CONTEXT: THE CASE OF ATHENS ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the contextual factors that shape the dynamics and the patterns of segregation in Athens. Migration and changes in the ethnic composition of the working class have not produced more segregation and widespread marginality, because employment opportunities and affordable housing were available in socially mixed areas. Attention, is drawn, however, to the dynamics of social polarization, the concentration of housing inequality and deprivation which have been reshaping the social map of the city since the 1990s. The suburbanization of higher social categories has been enhancing isolation of wealthy enclaves in the east and in parts of the centre. The indigenous working class population on the western periphery has become socially and spatially entrapped. At the same time a deprived and ethnically diverse population, has been concentrating in central, north-western and south-western districts. Keywords: segregation, immigration, ethnic segregation, Athens 1. INTRODUCTION: SEGREGATION IN THE INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE The definition of segregation is simple according to human geography dic- tionaries (Johnston et al., 1986: 424) and seems to have a general, inter- contextual, applicability (“The residential separation of subgroups within a wider population”). This simple metaphor from genetics, that subsequently *Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Crete, Greece. ** Professor of Social Geography, Ηarokopio University, Greece. 136 VASSILIS ARAPOGLOU, THOMAS MALOUTAS became the dominant meaning of the term, owed its success to the fact that it reflected the conditions of the booming American metropolis of the first half of the 20th century. -
Generation 2.0 for Rights, Equality & Diversity
Generation 2.0 for Rights, Equality & Diversity Intercultural Mediation, Interpreting and Consultation Services in Decentralised Administration Immigration Office Athens A (IO A) January 2014 - now On 1st January 2014, the One Stop Shop was launched and all the services issuing and renewing residence permits for immigrants in Greece were moved from the municipalities to Decentralised Administrations. Namely, the 66 Attica municipalities were shared between 4 Immigration Offices of the Attic Decentralised Administration. a) Immigration Office for Athens A with territorial jurisdiction over residents of the Municipality of Athens, Address: Salaminias 2 & Petrou Ralli, Athens 118 55 b) Immigration Office for Central Athens and West Attica, with territorial jurisdiction over residents of the following Municipalities; i) Central Athens: Filadelfeia-Chalkidona, Galatsi, Zografou, Kaisariani, Vyronas, Ilioupoli, Dafni-Ymittos, ii) West Athens: Aigaleo Peristeri, Petroupoli, Chaidari, Agia Varvara, Ilion, Agioi Anargyroi- Kamatero, and iii) West Attica: Aspropyrgos, Eleusis (Eleusis-Magoula) Mandra- Eidyllia (Mandra - Vilia - Oinoi - Erythres), Megara (Megara-Nea Peramos), Fyli (Ano Liosia - Fyli - Zefyri). Address: Salaminias 2 & Petrou Ralli, Athens 118 55 c) Immigration Office for North Athens and East Attica with territorial jurisdiction over residents of the following Municipalities; i) North Athens: Penteli, Kifisia-Nea Erythraia, Metamorfosi, Lykovrysi-Pefki, Amarousio, Fiothei-Psychiko, Papagou- Cholargos, Irakleio, Nea Ionia, Vrilissia, -
Correlation of Structural Seismic Damage with Fundamental Period of RC Buildings
Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 3, 45-67 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2013.31006 Published Online March 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojce) Correlation of Structural Seismic Damage with Fundamental Period of RC Buildings Anastasia K. Eleftheriadou, Athanasios I. Karabinis Laboratory of RC, Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece Email: [email protected] Received March 8, 2012; revised April 20, 2012; accepted May 5, 2012 ABSTRACT The sufficient estimation of the natural period of vibration constitutes an essential step in earthquake design and as- sessment and its role in the development of seismic damage is investigated in the current research. The fundamental period is estimated for typical reinforced concrete building types, representative of the building stock of Southern Europe, according to existing relationships. The building typologies also represent groups of 180,945 existing damaged buildings of an observational database created after the Athens (7-9-1999) near field earthquake. The estimated funda- mental periods are correlated to several degrees of the recorded damage. Important conclusions are drawn on the pa- rameters (height, structural type, etc.) that influence the seismic response and the development of damage based on the wide database. After conducting a correlation analysis, noticeable is the difference between the seismic demand of the elastic spectrum of the first (1959), the contemporary (2003) Greek Seismic Code and the values of peak ground accel- erations of several Athens earthquake records. Moreover, PGAs in most records are often between the lower and the upper bound of the estimated fundamental periods for RC buildings with regular infills (n-normal) and with ground lev- els without infill panels (p-pilotis) regardless the height. -
Waste Management in Greece Facts & Figures
Waste Management in Greece Facts & Figures Investor Presentation November 2012 Greece - An emerging WM and EFW market • Greece produced 12 million metric tons of waste annually of which 5.1 mil tons is Municipal Solid Waste (Source: Hellas stat, 2010 data) • Greek waste production per capita at 457 kg/capita (European average : 502kg/capital) • 85% of the waste produced is actually collected and almost 80% ends up in landfills (vs EU average of 41%). • 40% of MSW is organic ( vs. EU av. 25%) creating waste-to-energy opportunities. Complete sorting and treatment of MSW organic waste through MBT not possible yet. • Improved investment climate following June elections expected to create activity in WM Source : McKinsey Study : Greece 10 Years Ahead/ Opportunities in Waste Management (June 2012) Waste Composition Greece EU av. Greek Waste Management Statistics Greece EU Organic Waste 40% 25% Waste collected 85% 100% Paper 29% 35% Waste to landfill 77% 41% Plastic 14% 3% Organic waste treated 4% 68% Glass 3% 6% Metal 3% 11% Recycled Waste 21% 23% Other 11% 20% ⇒ Significant volumes of un-treated organic MSW 2 Municipal waste treated in 2009 Greece vs the EU sorted by % of land filling Greece ranks very low in terms of diversion of waste from landfills (23 rd ) Source: Eurostat Current status in treating MSW in Greece No defined EFW or WM technology yet • Current facilities: Land-filling remains preferred disposal method – 77 Sanitary Landfill sites plus 60 still active uncontrolled Landfills (gradually being shut down) – 3 Energy-from waste facilities (mainly Landfill mining) – 28 Recycling/MRF facilities • 19 recycling centers processed 1.050.000 tons of recyclable materials so as to salvage 525,000 tons of packing materials (in 2009) – 4 existing MBT plants / 1 new being developed • 2 composting plants (plus 1 being developed) • 2 biodrying plants • High portion of organic waste of which only 4% is treated (vs. -
Long-Term Post-Fire Vegetation Dynamics in Pinus Halepensis Forests of Central Greece
Plant Ecology 171: 101–121, 2004. 101 © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Long-term post-fire vegetation dynamics in Pinus halepensis forests of Central Greece: A functional group approach Dimitris Kazanis1 & Margarita Arianoutsou2,∗ 1Botanical Museum & Department of Ecology and Systematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece; 2Department of Ecology and Systematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece; ∗Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Key words: Aleppo pine, Dispersal, Diversity, Growth form, Resilience, Succession Abstract A hierarchical approach for plant functional classification was applied to describe long-term vegetation change in Pinus halepensis burned forests. Plant species were initially grouped according to their growth form and afterwards data on species modes of regeneration, persistence and dispersal, together with some other specific competitive advantages were explored, resulting in the identification of 29 different functional groups, 14 for woody and 15 for herbaceous species. Three types of Pinus halepensis forests were identified, according to the structure of the understorey. For each forest type, a post-fire chronosequence of communities was selected for sampling. Data sampling was performed for at least two consecutive years in each community, so as to reduce the shortcomings of the synchronic approach and to increase the age range of each chronosequence. Even though the vast majority of the functional groups proved to be persistent throughout the post-fire development of vegetation, their species richness and abundance did not remain stable. An increase of annual herb richness and abundance was recorded in the first years after the fire, with the leguminous species forming the dominant functional group. -
Europe Turns UN Blue to Mark UN75 on October 24, 2020 Final List of European Secured Buildings – Long List October 26
Europe Turns UN Blue to mark UN75 on October 24, 2020 Final List of European secured buildings – Long List October 26 Belgium: . Town Hall - Grand Place, Brussels . European External Action Service “EEAS”, Brussels . The European Commission Berlaymont, Brussels . European Council, Brussels . Palais Egmont, Brussels . Bozar cultural Center, Brussels . Hotel de Mérode, Brussels . Town hall, Dendermonde . Town hall, Uccle . Espace International Wallonie, Brussels . Stad Leopoldsburg, Limburg . The Municipality, Lasne Austria: . Hochstrahlbrunnen, Schwarzenbergplatz, Vienna Bosnia and Herzegovina: . Sarajevo City Hall . Stari Most, Mostar . Banski Dvor Cultural Center, Banja Luka Czechia: . Petrin Lookout Tower, Prague . Dancing House, Prague . Zizkov Television Tower, Prague . British Embassy, Prague . The Dome, Olomouc . Ostrava City Hall, Ostrava Denmark: . UN City, Copenhagen . City Hall, Copenhagen . Öresundsbroen, Copenhagen Finland: . The Finlandia House, Helsinki . The Opera House, Helsinki France: . UNESCO, Paris . Centre Mondial de la Paix, Verdun . Palais Justice, Lyon . Tour Perret, Grenoble Germany: . Old City Hall, Bonn . UN Tower, Bonn Greece: . Central Bridge, Trikala . City Hall, Fyli (Ano Liosia) . City Hall, Municipality Agion Anargiron - Kamaterou . City Hall, Municipality of Aristotelis . City Hall, Municipality of Delphi . City Hall, Municipality of Elefsina . City Hall, Municipality of Zografou . City Hall, Municipality of Igoumenitsa . City Hall, Municipality of the Holy City of Messolongi . City Hall, Municipality of Ilion . City Hall, Municipality of Kassandra . City Hall, Municipality of Katerini . City Hall, Municipality of Kifissia . City Hall, Minicipality of Kilkis . City Hall, Municipality of Marathonas . City Hall, Municipality of Megara . City Hall, Municipality of Pella . City Hall, Municipality of Pydnas Kolindrou . City Hall, Municipality of Serres . City Hall, Municipality of Skopelos . City Hall, Municipality of Agrinio .