Scleral Buckling Versus Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Aditya Maitray1, V Jaya Prakash2 and Dhanashree Ratra3
Major Review Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment Aditya Maitray1, V Jaya Prakash2 and Dhanashree Ratra3 1Fellow, Introduction include increased postoperative morbidity like Sri Bhagwan Mahavir Retinal detachment (RD) surgery is the most pain and periorbital oedema, drainage-related Vitreoretinal Services, common retinal surgery performed. RD can be complications like vitreoretinal incarceration, sub- Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India repaired either by scleral buckling (SB) or pars retinal haemorrhage and choroidal detachment, plana vitrectomy (PPV). Pneumoretinopexy, laser diplopia due to muscle restriction, chorioretinal delimitation or observation can be done in circulatory disturbances, refractive changes (typic- 2Associate consultant, selected cases. The decision to perform SB or ally axial myopia), epiretinal membrane forma- Consultant, vitrectomy depends on various factors, including tion, buckle intrusion, extrusion and infection. Sri Bhagwan Mahavir age of the patient, duration and extent of RD, Subretinal fluid may take time to absorb in case Vitreoretinal Services, presence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) of non-drainage procedure delaying anatomical Sankara Nethralaya, fi Chennai, India changes, the number, location and size of retinal recovery and resulting in poorer nal visual breaks and the lens status. Other factors which outcomes. influence the decision are availability of operating 3Senior Consultant, room equipment or staff, various patient factors Sri Bhagwan Mahavir Pars plana vitrectomy (especially expected compliance with positioning The major advantage of PPV over SB is the Vitreoretinal Services, after surgery) and surgeon preference.1 Until Sankara Nethralaya, improved internal search for breaks with micro- about a decade ago, SB was the preferred proced- Chennai, India scopic visualization of peripheral fundus by scleral ure, but there is a general trend towards vitrec- indentation and internal illumination.
[Show full text]