DOCSLIB.ORG

Maquetación 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ISSN (print): 1698-6180. ISSN (online): 1886-7995 www.ucm.es /info/estratig/journal.htm Journal of Iberian Geology 33 (2) 2007: 173-190 A contribution to knowledge of the development of marine life during the Permian and Triassic through the analysis of life histories of genera Contribución al conocimiento del desarrollo de la vida marina en el Pérmico y Triásico a través del análisis de la duración en el tiempo de los géneros Salvador Reguant Catedrático Emérito de Estratigrafía, Facultad de Geologia, Universidad de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain [email protected] Received: 12/01/06 / Accepted: 19/06/06 Abstract Data recently published on the longevity of various marine animal genera permits in-depht study of the history of marine life. The Permo-Triassic boundary, as well as the Permian and Triassic periods themselves, constitute a particularly interesting point in the history of life in the Phanerozoic, in that they straddle the most extensive extinction ever recorded.The analysis of the development of abundant genera (using classes and orders) in 13 marine animal taxa reveals that, on the one hand, all the taxa studied suffered the biggest change in their generic composition during these two periods precisely at the Permo-Triassic boundary, and, on the other hand, that certain groups display patterns during these two periods that do not conform to the overall trend. Keywords: Permian, Triassic, marine genera, life-history, diversity, extinctions Resumen El análisis de los datos que se conocen sobre la duración en el tiempo de todos los géneros marinos perminte profundizar en el conocimiento de la historia de la Vida. El límite Pérmico-Triásico y, en general, la historia de la Vida durante estos dos períodos presenta un particular interés debido a la existencia de la extinción más importante de seres vivos en el Fanerozoico. El análisis del comportamiento de los géneros en 13 grupos animales que presentan una particular abundancia ha permitido confi rmar la situación en el tiempo del extraordinario cambio conocido como extinción permo-triásica y ver las diferencias en el comportamiento que cada grupo de los considerados presentan a lo largo del Pérmico y del Triásico. Palabras clave: Conodontos, Permian, Triassic, marine genera, life-history, diversity, extinctions. 1. Introduction Studies relating to this theme refer to both event and the probable causes of this crisis in the history of life. According to Sepkoski’s (1984) classifi cation, the Likewise, the appearances, extinctions and biodiversity transition from Paleozoic to modern fauna occurs at the of living beings throughout fossiliferous periods are con- Permo-Triassic boundary, at the point of the largest mass stantly being analysed, as shown by the number of papers extinction in the history of Phanerozoic. published in specialized journals. These papers approach vol 33_2.indb 173 12/07/2007 18:57:57 174 Reguant / Journal of Iberian Geology 33 (2) 2007: 173-190 the subject from highly varying perspectives (see, for These candidates include: a possible meteorite impact example, Sepkoski, 1989; Erwin, 2000; Foote, 2003 and (Becker et al., 2004); the deterioration of atmospheric 2005; Bambach et al., 2004; Jablonski, 2005; Rohde and conditions leading to a drop in oxygen levels (Wignall Muller, 2005). The papers of Foote are based on the Sep- and Hallam, 1992; Wignall and Twitchett, 1996; Wei- koski compendium). dlich et al., 2003; Foster and Afonin, 2005); a decrease The publication of the compendium of fossil marine in primary biological productivity (Twitchett, 2001); sea- animal genera (Sepkoski, 2002), collated from the mate- level changes (Hallam and Wignall, 1999); and vulcanism rial published up to that point, has allowed us to review (Wignall, 2001; Mundil et al., 2004). the history of marine life at the end of the Paleozoic and In order to obtain a more complete view of how life beginning of the Mesozoic, a period of particular interest evolved in this period and in response to a considerable due to the aforementioned extinction and the path to re- interest surrounding the extinction, we posed the follow- covery that marine life took after the great catastrophe. ing question: what was the faunal composition of marine This paper describes this review and reveals some as- environments across the entire Permian and Triassic, not pects of interest that may contribute to understanding the just at the time immediately preceding and following the history of life in the Permian and Triassic periods. extinction? The description that follow aims to make a contribution to this knowledge and may help to explain 2. The history of Life and of the Earth in the the complexity of this event. Permo-Triassic 3. The Sepkoski compendium and how it is used here Uncovering the history of the Permian, and in some aspects, the Triassic, has historically proven more chal- Jack John Sepkoski Jr’s death in May 1999, meant that lenging than of any of the other geological periods of the the compendium of fossil marine animal genera he had Phanerozoic. been collating had to be published by his two friends, Da- The most important geologists of the nineeteenth cen- vid Jablonski and Michel Foote, of the University of Chicago. tury, for example, had obtain permission from the author- This compendium is very important, including infor- ities to be able to visit Russia and study the stratigraphic mation that Spekoski basically obtained from the vol- void that existed in the succession above the well-known umes of the Treatise on invertebrate Paleontology for in- Carboniferous. On this return to Britain, one of these ge- vertebrates, from Romer (1966) for vertebrates and from ologists, Roderick Impey Murchison, wrote to Tsar Nich- Loeblich and Tappan (1998) for foraminifera. olas I, informing him of the discoveries and that theyhad On publishing the work, his colleagues checked the named the new system the Permian, based on sedimen- material, made some correction and explained how this tary deposits with a large fossil record in the area they compendium was produced. visited near the Urals (Baars, 1992) Here, given that we only intend to analyse the history Studying the Triassic has also been complex, since the of marine animals in the Permian and Triassic, we have original outcrops of three layers found in Germany, which selected 13 varied taxa (mostly orders but also classes) give it its name – “trias” – do not provide much informa- that together represent a large proportion of the diversity tion on the history of life in this period. More complete of marine life existing during the time periods studied. information has been obtained in areas outside Germany, Erwin (1993) also adopted this approach when studied starting with the alpine area which, has given its name to teh Permian and part of the Triassic using data on the some of the stages of the system. existence of particular families found in previously pub- Despite these diffi culties, these periods have been the lished catalogues. subject of numerous papers, thanks to interest in the Per- The large number of studies, mentioned in the introduc- mo-Triassic mass extinction. These papers have either tion, which were published before the compendium itself described the size of the extinction and diversity recovery (though some of their authors had access to unpublished process, or discussed possible causes of the catastrophe. data that was later used in the compendium), has allowed Two authors have made very complete descriptions us to analyse general aspects, not limited to the periods of this extinction: P. Wignall and D. H. Erwin (Wignall, considered here, of the appearance and extinction of gen- 1992; Erwin, 1994, 1996a, 1996b and 2006). They have era, and biodiversity throughout the fossiliferous periods. been able to determine a single cause, as evidence that Our contribution aims to complete the vision of certain points towards various candidates has been found in the aspects of the history of marine life that have not been geological record. specifi cally dealt with previously. vol 33_2.indb 174 12/07/2007 18:57:57 Reguant / Journal of Iberian Geology 33 (2) 2007: 173-190 175 Ord. AXINELLIDA Epoch Age dt (in Ma) Ord. TABULOSPONGIDA Ord. (uncertain) Norian 16.9 LATE TRIASSIC Cl. CALCAREA (Ph. PORIFERA) Carnian 11.5 Ord. HETERACTINIDA Ord. PHARETRONIDA Ladinian 9 MIDDLE TRIASSIC Ord. PERMOSPHINCTA Anisian 8 Ord. SPHAEROCOELIDA Ord. (uncertain) Olenekian 4.7 EARLY TRIASSIC Ord. ARCHAEOGASTROPODA (Cl. GASTROPODA) Induan 1.3 Ord. NEOTAENIOGLOSSA (Cl. GASTROPODA) Ord. NAUTILIDA (Cl. CEPHALOPODA) Tatarian 9.4 LATE PERMIAN Ord. PTERIOIDA (Cl. BIVALVIA) Guadalupian 10.2 Ord. PODOCOPIDA (Cl. OSTRACODA) Ord. RHYNCHONELLIDA (Cl. ARTICULATA) Leonardian 9.4 Ord. SPIRIFERIDA (Cl. ARTICULATA) EARLY PERMIAN Sakmarian 14.6 Ord. TEREBRATULIDA (Cl. ARTICULATA) Asselian 4.4 Cl. OSTEICHTHYES Ord. COELOCANTHIFORMES Table 1.- Epochs, ages and time duration in the Permian and Triassic Ord. PALAEONISCIFORMES (see text for details) Ord. PTYCHOLEPIFORMES Tabla 1.- Épocas, edades y lapsos temporales del Pérmico y el Triásico (ver texto para más detalle) Ord. BOBASATRANIFORMES Ord. SAURICHTHYFORMES Ord. PHOLIDOPLEURIFORMES 4. The data considered and its treatment Ord. PERLEIDIFORMES Ord. PELTOPLEURIFORMES 4.1. Chronostratigraphy Ord. SEMIONOTIFORMES Ord. PYCNODONTIFORMES Inconsistencies in the nomenclature used to refer to dif- Ord. AMIIFORMES ferent chronostratigraphic units in the compendium, to the Ord. MACROSEIMIIFORMES extent that some names were not taken from the Interna- Ord. PACHYCORMIFORMES tional Stratigraphic Chart published by the “International Commission on Stratigraphy”, required us to spend some 4.3. Treatment applied time consulting chronostratigraphic scales and analysing equivalences. The epochs and ages we fi nally used, and For each of the taxa indicated, for each age, we calcu- their estimated duration (dt) can be seen in Table 1. lated the number of fi rst (FA) and last (LA) appearances, the number of existing genera (N) in that taxon in that 4.2.
Recommended publications
  • Early Triassic (Induan) Radiolaria and Carbon-Isotope Ratios of a Deep-Sea Sequence from Waiheke Island, North Island, New Zealand Rie S

    Early Triassic (Induan) Radiolaria and Carbon-Isotope Ratios of a Deep-Sea Sequence from Waiheke Island, North Island, New Zealand Rie S

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Palaeoworld 20 (2011) 166–178 Early Triassic (Induan) Radiolaria and carbon-isotope ratios of a deep-sea sequence from Waiheke Island, North Island, New Zealand Rie S. Hori a,∗, Satoshi Yamakita b, Minoru Ikehara c, Kazuto Kodama c, Yoshiaki Aita d, Toyosaburo Sakai d, Atsushi Takemura e, Yoshihito Kamata f, Noritoshi Suzuki g, Satoshi Takahashi g , K. Bernhard Spörli h, Jack A. Grant-Mackie h a Department of Earth Sciences, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University 790-8577, Japan b Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Culture, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan c Center for Advanced Marine Core Research, Kochi University 783-8502, Japan d Department of Geology, Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya 321-8505, Japan e Geosciences Institute, Hyogo University of Teacher Education, Hyogo 673-1494, Japan f Research Institute for Time Studies, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753-0841, Japan g Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan h Geology, School of Environment, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Received 23 June 2010; received in revised form 25 November 2010; accepted 10 February 2011 Available online 23 February 2011 Abstract This study examines a Triassic deep-sea sequence consisting of rhythmically bedded radiolarian cherts and shales and its implications for early Induan radiolarian fossils. The sequence, obtained from the Waipapa terrane, Waiheke Island, New Zealand, is composed of six lithologic Units (A–F) and, based on conodont biostratigraphy, spans at least the interval from the lowest Induan to the Anisian.
  • Gondwana Vertebrate Faunas of India: Their Diversity and Intercontinental Relationships

    Gondwana Vertebrate Faunas of India: Their Diversity and Intercontinental Relationships

    438 Article 438 by Saswati Bandyopadhyay1* and Sanghamitra Ray2 Gondwana Vertebrate Faunas of India: Their Diversity and Intercontinental Relationships 1Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Kolkata 700108, India; email: [email protected] 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India; email: [email protected] *Corresponding author (Received : 23/12/2018; Revised accepted : 11/09/2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020028 The twelve Gondwanan stratigraphic horizons of many extant lineages, producing highly diverse terrestrial vertebrates India have yielded varied vertebrate fossils. The oldest in the vacant niches created throughout the world due to the end- Permian extinction event. Diapsids diversified rapidly by the Middle fossil record is the Endothiodon-dominated multitaxic Triassic in to many communities of continental tetrapods, whereas Kundaram fauna, which correlates the Kundaram the non-mammalian synapsids became a minor components for the Formation with several other coeval Late Permian remainder of the Mesozoic Era. The Gondwana basins of peninsular horizons of South Africa, Zambia, Tanzania, India (Fig. 1A) aptly exemplify the diverse vertebrate faunas found Mozambique, Malawi, Madagascar and Brazil. The from the Late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic. During the last few decades much emphasis was given on explorations and excavations of Permian-Triassic transition in India is marked by vertebrate fossils in these basins which have yielded many new fossil distinct taxonomic shift and faunal characteristics and vertebrates, significant both in numbers and diversity of genera, and represented by small-sized holdover fauna of the providing information on their taphonomy, taxonomy, phylogeny, Early Triassic Panchet and Kamthi fauna.
  • EARLY TRIASSIC–EARLY JURASSIC BIVALVE DIVERSITY DYNAMICS Sonia Ros,1,2 Miquel De Renzi,1 Susana E

    EARLY TRIASSIC–EARLY JURASSIC BIVALVE DIVERSITY DYNAMICS Sonia Ros,1,2 Miquel De Renzi,1 Susana E

    PART N, REVISED, VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 25: EARLY TRIASSIC–EARLY JURASSIC BIVALVE DIVERSITY DYNAMICS Sonia RoS,1,2 Miquel De Renzi,1 SuSana e. DaMboRenea,2 and ana MáRquez-aliaga1 [1University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 2University of La Plata, La Plata, Argentina, [email protected]] INTRODUCTION effects on a global scale (newell, 1967; Raup & SepkoSki, 1982). The P/T extinc- Bivalves are a highly diversified molluscan tion event was the most severe biotic crisis class, with a long history dating from early in the history of life on Earth (Raup, Cambrian times (Cope, 2000). Although the 1979; Raup & SepkoSki, 1982; eRwin, group already showed a steady diversification 1993, 2006), not only in terms of taxo- trend during the Paleozoic, it only became nomic losses, but also in terms of the highly successful and expanded rapidly from drastic reorganization of marine ecosys- the Mesozoic onward. The Triassic was, for tems (eRwin, 2006; wagneR, koSnik, & bivalves, first a recovery period and later liDgard, 2006). The subsequent recovery a biotic diversification event. It was also of ecosystems was slow, compared with the time bivalves first fully exploited their other extinction events (eRwin, 1998), and evolutionary novelties. did not end until Middle Triassic times Whereas brachiopods are typical elements (eRwin, 1993; benton, 2003). of the Paleozoic Fauna (sensu SepkoSki), From a paleoecologic viewpoint, bivalves bivalves belong to the Modern Fauna, char- (together with brachiopods, although the acterized by a dramatic increase in diversifi- latter were disproportionally decimated) cation rates just after the Permian (SepkoSki, were the main shelled invertebrates to 1981, 1984).
  • Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Early Triassic of Northwestern Madagascar

    Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Early Triassic of Northwestern Madagascar

    Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia (Research in Paleontology and Stratigraphy) vol. 123(2): 219-242. July 2017 REDESCRIPTION OF ‘PERLEIDUS’ (OSTEICHTHYES, ACTINOPTERYGII) FROM THE EARLY TRIASSIC OF NORTHWESTERN MADAGASCAR GIUSEPPE MARRAMÀ1*, CRISTINA LOMBARDO2, ANDREA TINTORI2 & GIORGIO CARNEVALE3 1*Corresponding author. Department of Paleontology, University of Vienna, Geozentrum, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: [email protected] 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 34, I-20133 Milano, Italy. E-mail: cristina.lombardo@ unimi.it; [email protected] 3Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, I-10125 Torino, Italy. E-mail: giorgio.carnevale@ unito.it To cite this article: Marramà G., Lombardo C., Tintori A. & Carnevale G. (2017) - Redescription of ‘Perleidus’ (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Early Triassic of northwestern Madagascar . Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 123(2): 219-242. Keywords: Teffichthys gen. n.; TEFF; Ankitokazo basin; geometric morphometrics; intraspecific variation; basal actinopterygians. Abstract. The revision of the material from the Lower Triassic fossil-bearing-nodule levels from northwe- stern Madagascar supports the assumption that the genus Perleidus De Alessandri, 1910 is not present in the Early Triassic. In the past, the presence of this genus has been reported in the Early Triassic of Angola, Canada, China, Greenland, Madagascar and Spitsbergen. More recently, it has been pointed out that these taxa may not be ascri- bed to Perleidus owing to several anatomical differences. The morphometric, meristic and morphological analyses revealed a remarkable ontogenetic and individual intraspecific variation among dozens of specimens from the lower Triassic of Ankitokazo basin, northwestern Madagascar and allowed to consider the two Malagasyan species P.
  • Exceptional Vertebrate Biotas from the Triassic of China, and the Expansion of Marine Ecosystems After the Permo-Triassic Mass Extinction

    Exceptional Vertebrate Biotas from the Triassic of China, and the Expansion of Marine Ecosystems After the Permo-Triassic Mass Extinction

    Earth-Science Reviews 125 (2013) 199–243 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Exceptional vertebrate biotas from the Triassic of China, and the expansion of marine ecosystems after the Permo-Triassic mass extinction Michael J. Benton a,⁎, Qiyue Zhang b, Shixue Hu b, Zhong-Qiang Chen c, Wen Wen b, Jun Liu b, Jinyuan Huang b, Changyong Zhou b, Tao Xie b, Jinnan Tong c, Brian Choo d a School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK b Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China c State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China d Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China article info abstract Article history: The Triassic was a time of turmoil, as life recovered from the most devastating of all mass extinctions, the Received 11 February 2013 Permo-Triassic event 252 million years ago. The Triassic marine rock succession of southwest China provides Accepted 31 May 2013 unique documentation of the recovery of marine life through a series of well dated, exceptionally preserved Available online 20 June 2013 fossil assemblages in the Daye, Guanling, Zhuganpo, and Xiaowa formations. New work shows the richness of the faunas of fishes and reptiles, and that recovery of vertebrate faunas was delayed by harsh environmental Keywords: conditions and then occurred rapidly in the Anisian. The key faunas of fishes and reptiles come from a limited Triassic Recovery area in eastern Yunnan and western Guizhou provinces, and these may be dated relative to shared strati- Reptile graphic units, and their palaeoenvironments reconstructed.
  • From the Middle Triassic of Southern China

    From the Middle Triassic of Southern China

    Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 50 (2), 2011, 75-83. Modena, 31 ottobre 201175 A new species of the genus Perleidus (Actinopterygii: Perleidiformes) from the Middle Triassic of Southern China Cristina LOMBARDO, Zuo-Yu SUN, Andrea TINTORI, Da-Yong JIANG & Wei-Cheng HAO C. Lombardo, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “A. Desio”, Università degli Studi di Milano, I-20113, Milano, Italy; [email protected] Z.-Y. Sun, Department of Geology and Geological Museum, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China; [email protected] A. Tintori, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “A. Desio”, Università degli Studi di Milano, I-20113, Milano, Italy; [email protected] D.-Y. Jiang, Department of Geology and Geological Museum, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China; [email protected] W.-C. Hao, Department of Geology and Geological Museum, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China; [email protected] KEY WORDS - Actinopterygians, Perleidiformes, Perleidus sinensis n. sp., Middle Triassic, Southern China, Tethys. ABSTRACT - Perleidus sinensis n. sp., a new species of “Subholostean” fossil fish of the order Perleidiformes is described herein on the basis of a single, well-preserved specimen collected from the Upper Member of the Guanling Formation (Pelsonian, Middle Anisian, Middle Triassic) outcropping near Luoping (Yunnan Province) in South China. The vertebrate assemblage yielded by these levels is proving to be of importance with regard to the marine Triassic
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 15 Phylum Chordata Chordates are placed in the superphylum Deuterostomia. The possible rela- tionships of the chordates and deuterostomes to other metazoans are dis- cussed in Halanych (2004). He restricts the taxon of deuterostomes to the chordates and their proposed immediate sister group, a taxon comprising the hemichordates, echinoderms, and the wormlike Xenoturbella. The phylum Chordata has been used by most recent workers to encompass members of the subphyla Urochordata (tunicates or sea-squirts), Cephalochordata (lancelets), and Craniata (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). The Cephalochordata and Craniata form a mono- phyletic group (e.g., Cameron et al., 2000; Halanych, 2004). Much disagree- ment exists concerning the interrelationships and classification of the Chordata, and the inclusion of the urochordates as sister to the cephalochor- dates and craniates is not as broadly held as the sister-group relationship of cephalochordates and craniates (Halanych, 2004). Many excitingCOPYRIGHTED fossil finds in recent years MATERIAL reveal what the first fishes may have looked like, and these finds push the fossil record of fishes back into the early Cambrian, far further back than previously known. There is still much difference of opinion on the phylogenetic position of these new Cambrian species, and many new discoveries and changes in early fish systematics may be expected over the next decade. As noted by Halanych (2004), D.-G. (D.) Shu and collaborators have discovered fossil ascidians (e.g., Cheungkongella), cephalochordate-like yunnanozoans (Haikouella and Yunnanozoon), and jaw- less craniates (Myllokunmingia, and its junior synonym Haikouichthys) over the 15 06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 16 16 Fishes of the World last few years that push the origins of these three major taxa at least into the Lower Cambrian (approximately 530–540 million years ago).
  • Body-Shape Diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous Neopterygian fishes: Sustained Holostean Disparity and Predominantly Gradual Increases in Teleost Phenotypic Variety

    Body-Shape Diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous Neopterygian fishes: Sustained Holostean Disparity and Predominantly Gradual Increases in Teleost Phenotypic Variety

    Body-shape diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous neopterygian fishes: sustained holostean disparity and predominantly gradual increases in teleost phenotypic variety John T. Clarke and Matt Friedman Comprising Holostei and Teleostei, the ~32,000 species of neopterygian fishes are anatomically disparate and represent the dominant group of aquatic vertebrates today. However, the pattern by which teleosts rose to represent almost all of this diversity, while their holostean sister-group dwindled to eight extant species and two broad morphologies, is poorly constrained. A geometric morphometric approach was taken to generate a morphospace from more than 400 fossil taxa, representing almost all articulated neopterygian taxa known from the first 150 million years— roughly 60%—of their history (Triassic‒Early Cretaceous). Patterns of morphospace occupancy and disparity are examined to: (1) assess evidence for a phenotypically “dominant” holostean phase; (2) evaluate whether expansions in teleost phenotypic variety are predominantly abrupt or gradual, including assessment of whether early apomorphy-defined teleosts are as morphologically conservative as typically assumed; and (3) compare diversification in crown and stem teleosts. The systematic affinities of dapediiforms and pycnodontiforms, two extinct neopterygian clades of uncertain phylogenetic placement, significantly impact patterns of morphological diversification. For instance, alternative placements dictate whether or not holosteans possessed statistically higher disparity than teleosts in the Late Triassic and Jurassic. Despite this ambiguity, all scenarios agree that holosteans do not exhibit a decline in disparity during the Early Triassic‒Early Cretaceous interval, but instead maintain their Toarcian‒Callovian variety until the end of the Early Cretaceous without substantial further expansions. After a conservative Induan‒Carnian phase, teleosts colonize (and persistently occupy) novel regions of morphospace in a predominantly gradual manner until the Hauterivian, after which expansions are rare.
  • Assessing the Record and Causes of Late Triassic Extinctions

    Assessing the Record and Causes of Late Triassic Extinctions

    Earth-Science Reviews 65 (2004) 103–139 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Assessing the record and causes of Late Triassic extinctions L.H. Tannera,*, S.G. Lucasb, M.G. Chapmanc a Departments of Geography and Geoscience, Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, USA b New Mexico Museum of Natural History, 1801 Mountain Rd. N.W., Albuquerque, NM 87104, USA c Astrogeology Team, U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA Abstract Accelerated biotic turnover during the Late Triassic has led to the perception of an end-Triassic mass extinction event, now regarded as one of the ‘‘big five’’ extinctions. Close examination of the fossil record reveals that many groups thought to be affected severely by this event, such as ammonoids, bivalves and conodonts, instead were in decline throughout the Late Triassic, and that other groups were relatively unaffected or subject to only regional effects. Explanations for the biotic turnover have included both gradualistic and catastrophic mechanisms. Regression during the Rhaetian, with consequent habitat loss, is compatible with the disappearance of some marine faunal groups, but may be regional, not global in scale, and cannot explain apparent synchronous decline in the terrestrial realm. Gradual, widespread aridification of the Pangaean supercontinent could explain a decline in terrestrial diversity during the Late Triassic. Although evidence for an impact precisely at the boundary is lacking, the presence of impact structures with Late Triassic ages suggests the possibility of bolide impact-induced environmental degradation prior to the end-Triassic. Widespread eruptions of flood basalts of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) were synchronous with or slightly postdate the system boundary; emissions of CO2 and SO2 during these eruptions were substantial, but the contradictory evidence for the environmental effects of outgassing of these lavas remains to be resolved.
  • Actinopterygian Fishes (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Kalkschieferzone (Uppermost Ladinian) Near Meride (Canton Ticino, Southern Switzerland)

    Actinopterygian Fishes (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Kalkschieferzone (Uppermost Ladinian) Near Meride (Canton Ticino, Southern Switzerland)

    Actinopterygian fishes (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Kalkschieferzone (Uppermost Ladinian) near Meride (Canton Ticino, Southern Switzerland) Autor(en): Bürgin, Toni Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae Band (Jahr): 88 (1995) Heft 3 PDF erstellt am: 10.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-167705 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Eclogae geol. Helv. 88/3: 803-826 (1995) 0012-9402/95/030803-24 $1.50 + 0.20/0 Birkhäuser Verlag. Basel Actinopterygian fishes (Osteichthyes; Actinopterygii) from the Kalkschieferzone (Uppermost Ladinian) near Meride (Canton Ticino, Southern Switzerland) Tom Bürgin Key words: Kalkschieferzone. Middle Triassic. Monte San Giorgio, fossil Actinopterygii.
  • A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes

    A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes Romano, Carlo Abstract: About half of all vertebrate species today are ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii), and nearly all of them belong to the Neopterygii (modern ray-fins). The oldest unequivocal neopterygian fossils are known from the Early Triassic. They appear during a time when global fish faunas consisted of mostly cosmopolitan taxa, and contemporary bony fishes belonged mainly to non-neopterygian (“pale- opterygian”) lineages. In the Middle Triassic (Pelsonian substage and later), less than 10 myrs (million years) after the Permian-Triassic boundary mass extinction event (PTBME), neopterygians were already species-rich and trophically diverse, and bony fish faunas were more regionally differentiated compared to the Early Triassic. Still little is known about the early evolution of neopterygians leading up to this first diversity peak. A major factor limiting our understanding of this “Triassic revolution” isaninter- val marked by a very poor fossil record, overlapping with the Spathian (late Olenekian, Early Triassic), Aegean (Early Anisian, Middle Triassic), and Bithynian (early Middle Anisian) substages. Here, I review the fossil record of Early and Middle Triassic marine bony fishes (Actinistia and Actinopterygii) at the substage-level in order to evaluate the impact of this hiatus–named herein the Spathian–Bithynian gap (SBG)–on our understanding of their diversification after the largest mass extinction event of the past. I propose three hypotheses: 1) the SSBE hypothesis, suggesting that most of the Middle Triassic diver- sity appeared in the aftermath of the Smithian-Spathian boundary extinction (SSBE; ฀2 myrs after the PTBME), 2) the Pelsonian explosion hypothesis, which states that most of the Middle Triassic ichthyo- diversity is the result of a radiation event in the Pelsonian, and 3) the gradual replacement hypothesis, i.e.
  • 2009 Geologic Time Scale Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Precambrian Magnetic Magnetic Bdy

    2009 Geologic Time Scale Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Precambrian Magnetic Magnetic Bdy

    2009 GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST. HIST. ANOM. ANOM. (Ma) CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 65.5 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 542 CALABRIAN MAASTRICHTIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE 1.8 31 C31 251 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 70.6 254 2A PIACENZIAN 32 C32 L 630 C2A 3.6 WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN 33 CAMPANIAN CAPITANIAN 5 C3 5.3 266 750 NEOPRO- CRYOGENIAN 80 C33 M WORDIAN MESSINIAN LATE 268 TEROZOIC 3A C3A 83.5 ROADIAN 7.2 SANTONIAN 271 85.8 KUNGURIAN 850 4 276 C4 CONIACIAN 280 4A 89.3 ARTINSKIAN TONIAN C4A L TORTONIAN 90 284 TURONIAN PERMIAN 10 5 93.5 E 1000 1000 C5 SAKMARIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 297 99.6 ASSELIAN STENIAN SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 299.0 5A 100 300 GZELIAN C5A 13.8 M KASIMOVIAN 304 1200 PENNSYL- 306 1250 15 5B LANGHIAN ALBIAN MOSCOVIAN MESOPRO- C5B VANIAN 312 ECTASIAN 5C 16.0 110 BASHKIRIAN TEROZOIC C5C 112 5D C5D MIOCENE 320 318 1400 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 326 6 C6 APTIAN 20 120 1500 CALYMMIAN E 20.4 6A C6A EARLY MISSIS- M0r 125 VISEAN 1600 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 SIPPIAN M3 BARREMIAN C6C 23.0 345 6C CRETACEOUS 130 M5 130 STATHERIAN CARBONIFEROUS TOURNAISIAN 7 C7 HAUTERIVIAN 1750 25 7A M10 C7A 136 359 8 C8 L CHATTIAN M12 VALANGINIAN 360 L 1800 140 M14 140 9 C9 M16 FAMENNIAN BERRIASIAN M18 PROTEROZOIC OROSIRIAN 10 C10 28.4 145.5 M20 2000 30 11 C11 TITHONIAN 374 PALEOPRO- 150 M22 2050 12 E RUPELIAN