DOCSLIB.ORG

Europeana Cloud Deliverable 1.3 User Requirements Analysis and Case Studies Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Europeana Cloud Deliverable 1.3 User Requirements Analysis and Case Studies Report DELIVERABLE Project Acronym: Europeana Cloud Grant Agreement number: Europeana Cloud Deliverable 1.3 User Requirements Analysis and Case Studies Report. Content Strategy Report. Project Title: Europeana Cloud: Unlocking Europe’s Research via The Cloud Europeana Cloud Deliverable 1.3 User Requirements Analysis and Case Studies Report. Content Strategy Report. [Joint Deliverables 1.3 and 1.6: User Requirements Analysis and Case Studies Report (1.3) and Content Strategy Report (1.6)] Revision: Authors: Stavros Angelis (Athena RC) Agiatis Benardou (Athena RC) – Work Package Leader Nephelie Chatzidiakou (Athena RC) Panos Constantopoulos (Athena RC) Costis Dallas (Athena RC) Alastair Dunning (Europeana Foundation) Jennifer Edmond (TCD) Stefan Ekman (UGOT/SND) Vicky Garnett (TCD) Dimitris Gavrilis (Athena RC) Caspar Jordan (UGOT/SND) Kika Kalogeropoulou (Athena RC) Konstantinos Karozos (Athena RC) Ilze Lace (UGOT/SND) Rufus Latham (UGOT/SND) Marian Lefferts (CERL) Dimitra-Nefeli Makri (Athena RC) Athanassios Mantes (Athena RC) Eliza Papaki (Athena RC) Dimitar Popovski (UGOT/SND) Owain Roberts (NLW) Norman Roger (University of Edinburgh) Martin Schaller (ONB) Björn Sjögren (UGOT/SND) Ingeborg Versprille (CERL) Kees Waterman (KNAW) Project co-funded by the European Commission within the ICT Policy Support Programme Dissemination Level P Public P C Confidential, only for members of the consortium and the Commission Services Revision History Revision Date Author Organisation Description 1. September Agiatis Athena RC Table of Contents, initial content of the 2015 Benardou report. 2. October WP1 Revision of ToC and structure 08, 2015 members 3. November WP1 Amendments to the text, revisions and 2015 members changes. 4. November RCAB Review and approval of the text. 2015 5. November WP1 Final editing. 2015 members Statement of originality: This deliverable contains original unpublished work except where clearly indicated otherwise. Acknowledgement of previously published material and of the work of others has been made through appropriate citation, quotation or both. D1.3 User Requirements Analysis and Case Studies Report. Content Strategy Report. Executive summary1 The present Deliverable (1.3) comprises of two joint reports: former Deliverable 1.3 (User Requirements and Case Studies report) and Deliverable 1.6 (Content Strategy Report). As a product of a multi-scale, interdisciplinary effort, Deliverable 1.3 (User Requirements and Case Studies report / Content Strategy Report) employs a multi-faceted approach to make sense of the information needs and behaviour of Humanities and Social Sciences researchers both within and outside the Europeana ecosystem, while achieving profound understanding of the ways these communities interact with existing Europeana content and metadata. Through extensive and widely-levelled empirical research (Case Studies, Web Survey, Interviews, Focus Groups) complimented by thorough desk research (Literature review, study of particular thematic areas), and building on work previously conducted in the context of other Digital Humanities Research Infrastructures (DARIAH, EHRI, ARIADNE, NeDiMAH) Work Package 1 managed to reach a long list of non-prioritized User Requirements as well as a set of flexible Content Recommendations for the upcoming development of Europeana Research. 1 The members of Work Package 1 would like to thank the Research Communities Advisory Board (Prof. Lorna Hughes, Dr. Leif Isaksen, Prof. Karina Van Dalen-Oskam) for their insightful comments and supportive ideas throughout this endeavour. Europeana Cloud Deliverable 1.3 User Requirements Analysis & Case Studies Report. Content Strategy ReportPage 3 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND RELATED WORK ................................................................................................... 9 2.1. AN OVERVIEW OF USER INFORMATION BEHAVIOUR STUDIES ............................................................................................... 2.2. CONTENT-WISE DESK RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................... 2.3. OTHER RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES INITIATIVES ............................................................................................................ 2.4. WHAT ABOUT TOOLS? ............................................................................................................................................... 3. RESEARCH COMMUNITIES WEB SURVEY ..................................................................................................... 16 3.1 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 SAMPLE ................................................................................................................................................................ 17 3.3 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 21 3.4 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 4. HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CASE STUDIES .................................................................................... 38 4.1 ABOUT THE TASK: PURPOSE AND METHOD ................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 CASE STUDY 1: EDUCATION AND TRANSANA ............................................................................................................... 46 4.3 CASE STUDY 2: ART HISTORY AND HYPERIMAGE .......................................................................................................... 55 4.4 CASE STUDY 3: SOCIOLOGY AND NODEXL ................................................................................................................... 69 5. APIS IN HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES RESEARCH ............................................................................. 87 5.1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 87 5.2 SECTION 1: CURRENT TRENDS AND BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES IN API CREATION AND USAGE ................................................. 88 5.3 SECTION 2: RESEARCHER BEHAVIOURS WITH REGARDS TO APIS AND DATA GENERALLY .................................................... 106 5.4 SECTION 3: RECOMMENDATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES EUROPEANA MIGHT APPLY ........................................................... 123 6. RESEARCH THEMES FOR AGGREGATING DIGITAL CONTENT ...................................................................... 129 6.1 PARLIAMENTARY PAPERS IN EUROPE ........................................................................................................................ 130 6.2 POPULATION DISPLACEMENT AS A RESULT OF CONFLICT IN THE 20TH CENTURY ................................................................ 139 6.3 POLITICAL PROPAGANDA ....................................................................................................................................... 152 6.4 CHILDREN’S LITERATURE ........................................................................................................................................ 162 6.5 EUROPEAN SCHOOL HISTORY OF THE 20TH CENTURY .................................................................................................. 180 6.6 THE ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN .............................................................................................................................. 203 7. USER REQUIREMENTS AND CONTENT STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EUROPEANA RESEARCH ..... 217 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................................... 226 APPENDICES....................................................................................................................................................... 236 APPENDIX 1: EUROPEANA CLOUD RESEARCH COMMUNITY WEB SURVEY ............................................................................. 236 APPENDIX 2 EUROPEANA RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE – POLITICAL PROPAGANDA .................................................................. 247 APPENDIX 3 PARLIAMENTARY PAPERS IN EUROPE ............................................................................................................ 250 APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN SCHOOL HISTORY OF THE 20TH CENTURY ..................................................................................... 251 Europeana Cloud Deliverable 1.3 User Requirements Analysis & Case Studies Report. Content Strategy ReportPage 4 List of figures Figure 1. Respondents’ field of study ........................................................................................18 Figure 2. Disciplinary belonging. ...............................................................................................19 Figure 3. Participants’ professional affiliation and status ...........................................................20 Figure 4. Total number of researchers in the sample. ...............................................................20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engaging in Qualitative Research Methods: Opportunities for Prevention and Health Promotion
    Engaging in Qualitative Research Methods: Opportunities for Prevention and Health Promotion LeConté J. Dill, DrPH, MPH Assistant Professor Department of Community Health Sciences SUNY Downstate School of Public Health Learning Objectives O Describe personal values, life experiences, and professional activities that inform one’s research standpoint O Describe the value of engaging in qualitative research methods O Describe ethical concerns in qualitative research O Discuss the data collection and analytical procedures inherent in each approach of qualitative inquiry Qualitative Research O Shaped by both the subjects’ and researcher’s O Personal experience O Age O Gender O Race/ethnicity O Social class O Sexuality O Biases Peshkin, 1988; Merriam, 2002; Charmaz, 2004 What is Qualitative Research? O Long tradition in: anthropology, sociology, and clinical psychology O Emerging in: public health, medicine, nursing, education, and management O Concentrates on words and observations to express reality O Describes people in natural situations and settings O Asks: O What? O Why? O How? Peshkin, 1988; Merriam, 2002; Charmaz, 2004 The Role of Theory & Qualitative Research O Theory as a starting point for scrutiny rather than for application O The best qualitative studies are theoretically informed O Generate new theoretical insights through qualitative methods Charmaz, 2004; Denzin & Lincoln,2011 “While quantitative research can tell us much about the incidence and outcomes of disease, it cannot answer how to get patients to use medication when
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issues in Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS): a User and Developer Perspective
    The Qualitative Report Volume 23 Number 13 Article 5 3-6-2018 Current Issues in Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS): A User and Developer Perspective Jeanine C. Evers Erasmus University of Rotterdam, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr Part of the Law Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, and the Social Statistics Commons Recommended APA Citation Evers, J. C. (2018). Current Issues in Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS): A User and Developer Perspective. The Qualitative Report, 23(13), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3205 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Qualitative Report at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Qualitative Report by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Current Issues in Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS): A User and Developer Perspective Abstract This paper describes recent issues and developments in Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) as presented in the opening plenary at the KWALON 2016 conference. From a user perspective, it reflects current features and functionality, including the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning; implications of the cloud; user friendliness; the role of digital archives; and the development of a common exchange format. This user perspective is complemented with the views of software developers who took part in the “Rotterdam Exchange Format Initiative,” an outcome of the conference. Keywords Qualitative Data Analysis Software, QDAS, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, TLA AS.ti, Cassandre, Dedoose, f4analyse, MAXQDA, NVivo, QDA Miner, Quirkos, Transana, Exchange format, Interoperability, Qualitative Data Analysis, Learning Curve QDAS, Textual Data Mining, Cloud services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers for Manual Coding The
    2E Second Edition The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers ‘This book fills a major gap in qualitative research methods courses. Saldaña has accomplished what has not been done before - creating a text that clearly identifies the many choices one has in coding their data. I wish I had this book when I started conducting qualitative research. It should be required reading for all.’ Mark Winton, Criminal Justice Instructor, University of Central Florida ‘An excellent handbook that helps demystify the coding process with a comprehensive assessment of different coding types, examples and exercises. As such it is a valuable teaching resource and it will also be of use to anyone undertaking qualitative analysis.’ Kevin Meethan, Associate Professor in Sociology, Plymouth University The ‘The Coding Manual describes the qualitative coding process with clarity and expertise. Its wide array of strategies, from the more straightforward to the more complex, are skillfully explained and exemplified. This extremely usable manual is a must-have resource for qualitative researchers at all levels.’ Coding Manual for Tara M. Brown, Assistant Professor of Education, Brandeis University The second edition of Johnny Saldaña’s international bestseller provides an in-depth guide to the Qualitative Researchers multiple approaches available for coding qualitative data. Fully up-to-date, it includes new chapters, more coding techniques and an additional glossary. Clear, practical and authoritative, the book: • Describes how coding initiates qualitative data analysis • Demonstrates the writing of analytic memos • Discusses available analytic software • Suggests how best to use The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers for particular studies In total, 32 coding methods are profiled that can be applied to a range of research genres from grounded theory to phenomenology to narrative inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Laadullisen Aineiston Analyysiohjelmistot: Atlas.Ti
    LAADULLISEN AINEISTON ANALYYSIOHJELMISTOT: ATLAS.TI Sanna Herkama & Anne Laajalahti Metodifestivaalit, Tampere 27.8.2019 SANNA HERKAMA ANNE LAAJALAHTI Erikoistutkija, FT Koulutus- ja kehittämisjohtaja, FT INVEST-tutkimushanke, www.invest.utu.fi Infor, www.infor.fi Psykologian ja logopedian laitos Prologos ry, puheenjohtaja Turun yliopisto Mevi ry, varapuheenjohtaja ProCom ry, Tiede- ja teoriajaos, puheenjohtaja TOPICS & Laajalahti 2019 Herkama • Technologies in qualitative analysis • What can you and can’t do with ATLAS.ti? • ATLAS.ti in practice Laajalahti, A. & Herkama, S. (2018). Laadullinen analyysi ATLAS.ti-ohjelmistolla. • Utilising ATLAS.ti – pitfalls and benefits In R. Valli (Ed.), Ikkunoita • Closing remarks tutkimusmetodeihin 2. 5th edition. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus, 106–133. TECHNOLOGIES SHAPE OUR THINKING Medium is the 1 Conducting research has always been intertwined with the usage of message! various aids, tools, and technologies. Also, various software have assisted ~ Marshall McLuhan researchers for long. 2 Even such choices as the utilisation of A4 paper size (Järpvall 2016) and PowerPoint slides (Adams 2006) guide the way we process information, i.e. how we produce, reproduce, use, and share information! Herkama & Laajalahti 2019 TRADITIONAL OR COMPUTER ASSISTED Computer ANALYSIS? Assisted/Aided Qualitative 1 Traditional analysis: Should I go for a traditional way of analysing Data research material? Paper prints and coloring, copy-paste procedures, Analysis hanging papers on the wall, post-it tags etc.? Software 2 Computer assisted analysis: Should I use Computer Assisted/Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS)? Storing data in one place, checking up things quickly, handling text and audiovisual material parallel, creating summaries in seconds… Herkama & Laajalahti 2019 CAQDAS – RESTRICTING OR EXPANDING THINKING? 1 Technologies shape our thinking – whether we want it or not (Laajalahti & Herkama 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Qualitative Interviews in Evaluations: Improving Interview Data
    Using Qualitative Interviews in Evaluations: Improving Interview Data Part 2 of 2 Sarah Heinemeier, Compass Evaluation & Research Jill D. Lammert, Westat September 2 2015 Center to Improve Project Performance (CIPP), Westat These webinars were developed as part of the Center to Improve Project Performance (CIPP) operated by Westat for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). For those of you who aren’t familiar with CIPP, our purpose is to advance the rigor and objectivity of evaluations conducted by or for OSEP-funded projects. This involves providing technical assistance in evaluation to OSEP grantees and staff and preparing TA products on a variety of evaluation- related topics. We’d like to thank our reviewers Jennifer Berktold, Susan Chibnall, and Jessica Edwards, and the OSEP Project Officers who provided input. Suggested Citation: Heinemeier, S., & Lammert, J.D.. (2015). Using qualitative interviews in evaluations: Introduction to interview planning (Part 2 of 2). Webinar presented as part of the Technical Assistance Coordination Center (TACC) Webinar Series, July 29, 2015. Rockville, MD: Westat. 1 Goals of the Two-Part Series • Part 1 - Help a study team decide whether to include interviews in an evaluation design - Outline the steps associated with using qualitative interviews as part of a rigorous evaluation - Highlight key logistical decisions associated with planning high quality interviews • Part 2 - Discuss what should be asked in the interview and how to collect high-quality interview data - Offer guidance on how to define and recognize high quality data - Discuss strategies to ensure high quality interview data are collected and utilized ~ ,.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of MAXQDA in Qualitative Research Data Analysis
    Application of MAXQDA in Qualitative Research Data Analysis Trainers: Linda Kimmel, ISR, UM Hanan Abdul Rahim, SESRI David Howell, ISR, UM Workshop Outline -- Monday 8:00-8:30 Introductory Qualitative Data Analysis concepts 8:30-10:00 Introductory Concepts and an Introduction to Basic MAXQDA Features 10:00-10:15 Break 10:15-12:15 Creating a New Project to Code Text Data 12:15-12:30 Break 12:30-2:00 Working with Different Document Types in MAXQDA 8:00-8:30 Introductory Concepts Introductory Concepts • Workshop focus • Brief overview of types of qualitative data • Computer software and qualitative data • Why we picked MAXQDA Workshop Focus: Objectives The workshop is designed to give participants a basic understanding of how the analysis of qualitative and mixed methods data can benefit from existing software tools. Through examples and guided hands-on practice, the workshop aims to empower participants to apply such tools in their own work. Workshop Focus: Objectives The specific objectives of the workshop are to: – Introduce the use of software tools in qualitative research data analysis – Demonstrate various functions of MAXQDA software from preparing data to retrieving coded text – Practice applying MAXQDA to data collected by the Social and Economic Survey Research Institute (SESRI) Workshop Focus We will not cover: • Qualitative study design • Qualitative data collection Types of Qualitative Data Form Public Private Physical Objects Sculptures, street signs, store Personal items, blood merchandise, buildings, schools samples, clothing,
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Import Is Important Too 3.5 Agreeing a Common Data Exchange Standard—The Qudex Schema 4
    FORUM: QUALITATIVE Volume 12, No. 1, Art. 35 SOCIAL RESEARCH January 2011 SOZIALFORSCHUNG CAQDAS Comparability. What about CAQDAS Data Exchange? Louise Corti & Arofan Gregory Key words: Abstract: This article seeks to address the theme of the comparability of Computer Assisted qualitative data Qualitative Data AnalysiS (CAQDAS) packages through comparing current software archiving; exchangeability and portability. Our perspective is from a data sharing and archiving perspective metadata; and the need for open data exchange standards for qualitative data which will enable longer-term descriptive sustainability of both data collections and of annotations on these data. Descriptive metadata allow standards; QuDex; us to describe data robustly and using a common standard enables us to tap the common features DDI of any complex collection. A set of "raw" research outputs (data) have common descriptive elements such as how the research project was funded and how the data were sampled, collected and analysed to form conclusions from that investigation. Data kept for the longer term must ideally be software and platform independent. In this way, we can help future-proof data resources. Most CAQDAS packages use proprietary databases to manage their data and annotations, and very few enable export of annotated data. In this article we argue for an open descriptive standard that will enable description and interpretation of data for the longer term in data archives and to which proprietary software, such as all CAQDAS packages, can import and export. The use of the term "annotation" or "annotating" is taken to mean any action on the text—classifying, coding, memoing or relating. This meaning of the term is commonly used in the linguistic community, but less so by social scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Saldaňa's Coding Methods Onto the Literature Review Process
    Journal of Educational Issues ISSN 2377-2263 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1 Mapping Saldaňa’s Coding Methods onto the Literature Review Process Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie (Corresponding author) Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling, Box 2119 Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas 77341-2119, USA Tel: 1-936-294-4509 E-mail: [email protected] Rebecca K. Frels Department of Counseling and Special Populations Lamar University, 223 Education Building, Beaumont, Texas 77710, USA E-mail: [email protected] Eunjin Hwang Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling, Box 2119 Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas 77341-2119, USA E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 24, 2016 Accepted: March 28, 2016 Published: March 29, 2016 doi:10.5296/jei.v2i1.8931 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jei.v2i1.8931 Abstract Onwuegbuzie and Frels (2014) provided a step-by-step guide illustrating how discourse analysis can be used to analyze literature. However, more works of this type are needed to address the way that counselor researchers conduct literature reviews. Therefore, we present a typology for coding and analyzing information extracted for literature reviews based on Saldaňa’s (2012) coding methods. We present stages for conducting these analyses using an actual body of published works and illustrate how to use a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software program, namely, QDA Miner. Finally, we delineate how using this systematic approach promotes counselor identity and addresses the call for ethical, transparent research and evidence-based practices. 130 www.macrothink.org/jei Journal of Educational Issues ISSN 2377-2263 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1 Keywords: Literature review, Saldaňa’s coding methods, Analyzing the literature, Coding the literature, Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software program, QDA Miner 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Data, Analysis, and Design 343 Focus on Common Qualitative Research
    Qualitative Data, 12 Analysis, and Design O u t l i n e Overview Case Study Qualitative Inquiry and Basic Principles Phenomenology Qualitative Data Ethnography Worldview Narrative General Approaches Mixed Methods The Qualitative Metaphor Qualitative Research in the Literature Text as Data: Basic Strategies Classroom Climate Recap: The Qualitative Challenge The Art of Teaching Coding Minority Teachers Relational Strategies Learning Disability Coping Strategies Hierarchy Dyslexia Typology Parental Involvement Networks Detracking Tables and Cross Tabulations Immigrant Newcomers Inseparable Data Collection and Scaffolding Analysis Data Analysis Software Emergent Methodology Summary Reliability and Validity: Trustworthiness Key Terms Credibility Application Exercises Pattern Matching Student Study Site Research Designs References Overview Recall from the two previous chapters that researchers seek the guidance of a research design, a blueprint for collecting data to answer their questions. Those chapters described experimen- tal and non-intervention designs, often incorporating statistical analysis, that are commonly used in educational research. This chapter continues a sampling of research designs with a 342342 Chapter 12: Qualitative Data, Analysis, and Design 343 focus on common qualitative research. The orientation of qualitative researchers contrasts sharply with that of quantitative researchers on many dimensions. Their thinking generates questions that are answered with an emergent methodology, and their approach to rich sources of data requires creativity for its analysis. Such divergent (“outside the box”) thinking is appar- ent in the tasks of designing and analyzing qualitative research. This will become clear in this chapter when we focus on how researchers analyze qualitative studies to extract the most meaning while ruling out alternative explanations. “Emergent” designs in the tradition of qualitative research suggest a process that is not predetermined.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimenting with the Transfer of Analyzed Research Projects Between QDA Software
    Volume 21, No. 2, Art. 22 May 2020 What is the REFI-QDA Standard: Experimenting With the Transfer of Analyzed Research Projects Between QDA Software Jeanine Evers, Mauro Ugo Caprioli, Stefan Nöst & Gregor Wiedemann Key words: Abstract: The open REFI-QDA standard allows for the exchange of entire projects from one QDA qualitative data software to another, on condition that software vendors have built the standard into their software. analysis; QDAS; To reveal the new opportunities emerging from overcoming QDA software lock-in, we describe an CAQDAS; experiment with the standard in four separate research projects done by several researchers during ATLAS.ti; iLCM; a week at the Lorentz Centre (The Netherlands) in August 2019. Each researcher exchanged some NVivo; Transana; processed research data between two qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) packages. We Quirkos; REFI- start by envisaging the development of the REFI-QDA standard, followed by the context of each QDA project; research project, the type(s) of data in it, the reasons for wanting to do the transfer to another REFI-QDA program and the lessons learnt in doing so. We conclude with the benefits of the REFI-QDA standard; REFI- standard and the issues to be taken into account when considering a transfer between QDAS. QDA codebook; interoperability; Table of Contents use cases REFI- QDA 1. Introduction 2. QDAS: Past and Future 2.1 The role and acceptance of QDAS 2.2 Origin and function of the REFI-QDA standard 3. Introduction to the Cases and Terminology of REFI and QDAS 4. ATLAS.ti to Transana: Revolt in Curaçao 4.1 Project context and goals 4.2 Data formats and preparation 4.3 Analysis and tools used in QDAS 4.4 Conclusion: lessons learnt and benefits of transfer 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing a CAQDAS Software Package
    Choosing CAQDAS software Ann Lewins & Christina Silver Choosing a CAQDAS Package A working paper by Ann Lewins & Christina Silver Glossary: CAQDAS - Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Qualitative data analysis – see below Content analysis – quantitative analysis of the occurrence of words, language Interactive – good, instant hyper linking (usually one click or double click) between an object e.g. a code in one pane and e.g. and highlighted source context in another (KWIC is an aspect of interactivity) Invivo Coding – in the context of software, a short-cut tool for using a word or short phrase in the data, as a code label Autocoding or Text search - a search for words or phrases in the data files Hits – the initial finds in the data which result from the above KWIC - Retrieval of key words in context It is not always easy to visualise exactly what a CAQDAS package offers when exploring it for the first time yourself. Equally, when asking someone else for their opinion, it is not always easy to know which questions you should be asking. Most of the software packages we are aware of and discuss regularly are excellent products in one way or several! Sometimes you choose the package that is already in situ and make good use of it – but if you have a choice about which software to purchase for your research project, you may be in some uncertainty about how to proceed. You may have basic understanding about what a CAQDAS software package will do, but the differences between the tools offered in each package are subtly but significantly different.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Tools for Qualitative Research
    Digital Tools for Qualitative Research Digital Tools sessions at The International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign May 17-19, 2018 The full conference program from May 16-19, 2018 is available at http://icqi.org/program/ Sponsors We would like to thank the following sponsors for their donations! They funded our social at Murphy’s Pub on Thursday, May 17 th , 8-10pm Be sure to join us! Murphy’s Pub is located on 604 E. Green Street, (Google Maps says it’s a 4-minute walk from the Illini Union Building!) History In 2008, this group met for the first time during the pre-conference day, Technology in Qualitative Research, comprised of eighteen presenters and sixty- two participants. The group introduced a Digital Tools for Qualitative Research Strand during the 2015 Congress, and in 2016 we became a Special Interest Group (SIG). Connect with us! https://digitaltoolsforqualitativeresearch.org/ [email protected] https://www.facebook.com/DigitalToolsforQualitativeResearch/ https://twitter.com/Digital_Qual @Digital_Qual Community Activities Thursday, May 17th Social Event Time: 8-10pm Location: Murphy’s Pub, 604 E. Green St. (Google Maps say it’s a 4-minute walk from the Illini Union Building!) The first drink is on us (while supplies last!), thanks to our generous sponsors: Atlas.ti, MAXQDA (Verbi), NVivo (QSR), Queri, Quirkos, and Transana. Saturday, May 20 th Digital Tools for Qualitative Research SIG Meeting Time: 1-2:20 pm Location: Lincoln 1057 Join in a planning meeting for the Digital Tools for Qualitative Research Special Interest Group. We will discuss leadership opportunities, review our budget, collect feedback and plan for next year.
    [Show full text]