DOCSLIB.ORG

Zados Tesis Fin De Master Alumno: ZHANG YINGLE Director: Jesús Ulargui Agurruza DIMITRIS PIKIONIS ROADS of the TIMES This Is a Book of Time

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zados Tesis Fin De Master Alumno: ZHANG YINGLE Director: Jesús Ulargui Agurruza DIMITRIS PIKIONIS ROADS of the TIMES This Is a Book of Time ETSAM_MPAA_2013/14_Estudios Oficiales de Master y Doctorado en Proyectos Arquitecónicos Avanzados Tesis Fin de Master_Alumno: ZHANG YINGLE_Director: Jesús Ulargui Agurruza DIMITRIS PIKIONIS ROADS OF THE TIMES This is a book of time, This is a book of a trip, This is a book of action, roads and memory. Through the roads along the Acropolis and Filopappou, Pikionis shows us how the task of the architect is not only occupy new spaces but also to renew the sense of those that already exist. The author of one of the most significant landscape planning of the twentieth century, the pavement project of the Acropolis in Athens, Pikionis teaches us how a simple path can be transformed into a powerful tool of redevelopment and as a network of visual connection can revive the lost relationship. THE FILOPAPPOU ROAD 10 PAINTED AUTOBIOGRAPHY 10 TRACING THE VESTIGES 10 THE ACROPOLIS ROAD 10 HELLENISTIC INTERNATIONALIST 106 SIMILAR WORDS DISCRIMINATE LANGUAGES 101 This book consists of a series This book consists of 4 simultaneously of monologues, from the view of proceeding chapters. phenomenology, to demonstrate a process of action experience, spatial composition 1. Monologue of the Filopappou road and very important, the mental change 2. Autobiography of a visitor’s promenade from the very 3. Reference beginning to the top point of the Dimitris 4. Monologue of the Acropolis road Pikionis’ pavement project at the Acropolis site. 1 &4 are the monologue of the selected areas in these 2 roads - Acropolis and The road in the Acropolis site is divided Filoppapo. Each selected area is an into two parts, one (500m) up to Acropolis autonomous story. These two chapters and the other (700m) up to the opposite record the spatial composition, time, hill – Filopappou, with branches to an actions and mental experience. All the ancient mausoleum. By the two raods, information would contribute to establish a Pikionis created a belt that hitches two series of scenes in the project. monuments to evoke the splendid Greek history in modern world. 2. Autobiography, in this chapter, we will see Pikionis of two professions: As a What is more, this project demonstrates painter, his dedication of paintings and a process of time that brings visitors from love of nature is the root of his thoughts; THE MANUAL the outer worldly street to inner silent as an architect, he was facing the realm. It is a mental transmission results quandary of national and universal spirit from physical motion. throughout his career. Time and action are critical factors in 3. Reference, this chapter is to study the the transmission of the road. This thesis external influences in Pikionis’ design is based on them. By recording the of the Acropolis project. The architect is respective promenade part by part, the captivated by the attraction of antithetical intention is to draw the clear sequence of worlds. His journey of exploration, a the two routes. difficult journey that uses architecture and landscape as mileposts, led him closer to Pikionis’ autobiography and his affinity the culture of Asia past. He incorporated with the oriental world will be studied as the oriental philosophy with the scientific references to help to explain the idea. analysis, creating the unique symbolic significance. These four columns of words, pictures, sketches form a montage so they can be shared and compared along with the reading, like the real promenade in the road. FILOPAPPOU ROAD FIG / FL FIG / FLMK PAINTED AUTOBIOGRAPHY TRACING THE VESTIGES FIG / ACMK FIG / AC ACROPOLIS ROAD THE FIRST PART PAINTED AUTOBIOGRAPHY TRACING THE VESTIGES THE FIRST PART The FIRST PART of the Filopappou road “Un espíritu arquitectónico nuevo –que no “Pikionis is attracted by the plurality of 1. THE INITIATION consists of a 139 meters straight route, es diferente del antiguo– está naciendo. traditions that have helped to establish side walkways and the St. Demetrius La arquitectura, la pintura, la escultura, a culture of unusual importance as the 10:00 _01/06/2014_ 37°58′13.1″N Loumbardiaris chapel. In these areas, artes que, a finales del Renacimiento, Greek one and to shape a common 23°43′20.7″E_ Standing in front of the Pikionis aims to create the space as intervienen de manera sustancial en el Mediterranean land, that is the cradle and entry of Acropolis road; Back to the noisy partition from the outer street, to renew the espíritu pictórico, son llamadas ahora the background of universal myths.” 1 street; Eager to start the journey towards route and to prepare for the subsequent a someterse a las exigencias rigurosas the upper sacred place. promenade. del espíritu arquitectónico. (...) La nueva "…that the course of Hellenism is época está abierta a los artistas – dependent on our responsible position SPACE KEY WORDS: Enthusiastic, 1. THE INITIATION arquitectos, escultores, pintores– que se between the East and the West. And I will Extended, esfuercen en la restitución de la forma add: and from the competent composition ACTION KEY WORDS: Expecting, 17:50 _31/05/2014_37 ° 58'12 .6 "N estética integral de nuestro tiempo” 1 of the opposing currents into a new Ambitious Fig / Acropolis Road / 01 / Site View before the 23 ° 43'18 .9" E_ Facing the entry of shape. I could analyze how this problem project DURATION: Beginning Filopappou road, after crossing the busiest manifests itself in Architecture. But it route in Athens which is full of tourists, would suffice here to say that I am from The two photos taken before (FIG/AC/01) citizens, vendors and street performers . the East.” 2 and after (FIG/AC/02) Pikionis’ Acropolis project illustrate the relocation of the SPACE KEY WORDS: Rupture, Extended, “Pikionis admitted to ‘a slightly Japanese entry up to the Acropolis. The situation Fig / Filopappou Road / 01 / Project Masterplan Vaguely / Dimtris Pikionis character’ in the building, which was showed on the second photo has been ACTION KEY WORDS: Curiosity, the result of eclectic affinity and not of remained until today. The entire pavement Adventurist indefensible influence. Of all the Oriental is divided into two parts by three streets: DURATION: Beginning arts which he studied, it was in Japan that Street Dionysiou Areopagitou and Street he found the Greek virtues: simplicity, Rovertou Galli on east side; Street Standing at the entry of Filopappou restraint, lightness, logic and ‘a shorter Apostolou Pavlou on west side. They have road, back to the crowded street, we and diagrammatic concept of representing formed an intersection for vehicles and see a stationary scene. The middle gray the world’”. 3 pedestrians. The walking street Dionysiou lithic pavement with trees on both sides, Areopagitou is close to the south side of forming a horizontal three-segment layout, Mountain Acropolis, theatre Dionysus and while the contrasts between bright paving Odeon Herodes Atticus. At the end of this 1. Alberto Ferlenga, Road of stones, Places of Fig / Acropolis Road / 02 / Site View after the blocks and the dark trees emphasize the dreams, Two Dimitirs Pikionis’ works in Athens, project street locates the entry of Acropolis road. road as the spatial protagonist. Pikionis Other ways 1 Homage to Pikionis, COACYLE, 2005, knows how to maintain the natural pag. 28, Print Apart from the traffic function, the property of landscape in his landscape 2.Dimitirs Pikionis, Autobiographical Notes, Dimitris intersection also acts importantly on project. He doesn’t choose those straight Pikionis, Architect 1887-1968 A SENTIMENTAL Pikionis’ organization of the uphill journey. trees to contour the boundary. Those TOPOGRAPHY, London, ARCHITECTURAL This joint part with three streets is full of ASSOCIATION LONDON, 1989, pag. 35, Print bent treetops meet above the road; also Fig / Filopappou Road / Paving Pattern Mock-up Components commercial and touristic scenes that drive Fig / Acropolis Road / Paving Pattern Mock-up Components establish a three-segment in vertical 3. P. PSOMOPOULOS, DIMITRIS PIKIONIS: this area away from the metaphysical and composition: road, trees and sky (Fig/ 1. CHATZINIKOLAU, Nikos, “Pikionis, l’arte e lo An indelible Presence in Modern Greece, DIMITRIS archeology atmosphere that Pikionis sets FL/02). spiritodell’epoca”, en Controspazio , “L’opera de PIKIONIS 1887 - 1968, Bastas-Plessas Publications, alongside the roads. 012 DimitrisPikionis”, 5/1991 Athens, 1994 013 FILOPAPPOU ROAD FIG / FL FIG / PA PAINTED AUTOBIOGRAPHY TRACING THE VESTIGES FIG / TV FIG / AC ACROPOLIS ROAD This grid scene attracts people’s attention Pikionis was regarded as a painter instead Convinced of Greek culture is the bridge People who want to experience both of to the end of view. It prolongs the spatial of a mutual architect for a long time in the connects the East and the West, Pikionis’ the roads must cross over this worldly scale. The linear direction and vegetation first decades of his career. Painting indeed dedication of the indigenous culture, area; thence the meditation that has been screens on both sides underline the purity acts as a critical role in his thoughts and and the affinity with Orient, cultivate the accumulated in the previous promenade of the space, predicting the upcoming has a great influence on the architectural numerous works of a variety range of would be eased or even eliminated. This promenade and calming down the mood. design. He distributed several years to fields, paintings, architecture projects intersection is a “void” between the two This straight and upward road is a study painting and sculpture in Germany and the landscape planning. All his pavements that to refresh the physical mysterious tunnel that provokes people to and Paris. Then he returned to Greece works indicate the two most outstanding space as well as mental impression. enter. and started his architectural study. The concerns: 1. Seeking for the innermost Pikionis makes fully use of the material young architect, with professional art root of Greek from the East world.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Evidence on the Origin of the Influence of Nietzsche and of the Idea of Immanent
    fig. 1 G. de Chirico, Scatola di cerini e sigarette, ca 1904-1906 13 New Evidence on the Origin of the Influence of Nietzsche and of the Idea of Immanent Myth in Giorgio de Chirico: Mavìlis, Palamàs and the Early XX Century Athens Literary Scene Fabio Benzi There have been many attempts at identifying an influence of the Greek milieu on the young Gior- gio de Chirico. From his birth (1888) to his late adolescence, the artist lived in Greece, in Volos and especially Athens, until he moved to Munich in October 1906. So, he spent the first eighteen years of life – undoubtedly a formative moment for any young intellectual – mostly in Athens, where he also completed his first artistic studies in the Academy of Fine Arts of the Polytechnic School. As might be expected, research aimed at contextualizing and furthering the knowledge of pos- sible Hellenic influences on de Chirico’s artistic activity has focused so far on the specific analysis of the local painting scene, although with little or less than significant results. To be sure, we are not aware of any extant early painting from his Greek period, except for a negligible, small still life painted on cardboard, depicting a box of matches with a lit cigarette leaning against it (fig. 1); the verso shows an earlier copy of a detail of a chromolithography by Bel- gian painter Jan van Beers (Lier, 27 March 1852-Fay- aux-Loges, 17 November 1927), which we have iden- tified here (figs. 2, 3).1 If this copy is an example of the nearly photographic unyielding adherence by a young artist who might have not yet attended the academy, the small oil is actually a genre exercise, probably painted while de Chirico was still a student.
    [Show full text]
  • When Crisis Becomes Form: Athens As a Paradigm Theophilos Tramboulis and Yorgos Tzirtzilakis
    When Crisis Becomes Form: Athens as a Paradigm Theophilos Tramboulis and Yorgos Tzirtzilakis Documenta 14 in Athens: a glossary Documenta 14 (d14) was an undoubtedly important exhibition which triggered endless debate and controversy that continues today.1 The choice of Athens as a topological paradigm by Adam Szymczyk, an ingenious curator with expected and unexpected virtues, initially fired people’s appetite and enthusiasm. Yet what it ultimately managed to do was demythicize the event itself in a way, as well as demonstrate a series of dangers in the operation of the institution. At the same time it brought to light a series of innate ailments and fantasies of contemporary culture in Greece, which manifested themselves in a distorted and sometimes aggressive fashion. This is not without significance, since it functioned complementarily to—rather than independently of—the exhibition. In short, d14 served as a kind of double mirror with which we could see the cultural relation of Greece with Europe and the world, but also the reverse: that of Europe with Greece. So what was d14 in Athens? For now we must necessarily sidestep its contribution to making Athens and Greek culture a temporary center of international attention in order to focus on what must not be overlooked. The series of arguments below can be read individually or successively as a network of alternating commentary, but also through their diagonal intersections, ruptures, disagreements, and connections, where meaning is produced in a syncretic or dialectical way. D14 is the symptom from which all discourse around it begins. 1/11 A political metonymy The critical reception of d14 in Greece focused mainly on the institution and its operation; on its discursive and political context rather than the works, concerts, or lectures— generally speaking, the actual art and discourse presented by the exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Adoptions
    Dimitris Arvanitakis: Head of the Publications Department Born in Zakynthos, Dimitris Arvanitakis is a graduate of the Department of Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies of the University of Athens. As a fellow of the Academy of Athens from 1995 to 1999, he conducted research for his doctoral dissertation at Istituto di Studi Bizantini e Postbizantini of Venice, which was successfully defended at the Ionian University in Corfu (1999). His scientific interests span a wide range of topics: social history, history of ideas and intellectual history, history of literature and historiography, Modern Greek and Italian history, and the formation of national states. Since 2000, he has been working at the Benaki Museum and since 2006 he has been in charge of the Publications Department. In his capacity as Head of Publications, he has overseen and coordinated the publication of a great number of the Museum’s exhibition and collections catalogues and has been scientific editor of many books, including the series Benaki Museum Library. Dimitris Arvanitakis has taught in postgraduate seminars in Greece and Italy, has organized scientific conferences and has edited a number of scientific volumes. Moreover, he has published many articles in scientific volumes, journals and conference proceedings. He is a member of the Editorial Secretariat of the Greek journal Ta Istorika and the Italian journal Periptero, member of the Review Team of the journal Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana, Scientific Director of the Casa di Ugo Foscolo / Hugo Foscolo’s House (Zakynthos), and since 2009 he has been a Member and Coordinator of the Scientific Committee which oversees the publication of Andreas Kalvos’ Works by the Benaki Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE ZONGOLOPOULOS George Zongolopoulos (Athens, 1903-2004) Was One of the Most Important Greek Artists and Representatives Of
    GEORGE ZONGOLOPOULOS George Zongolopoulos (Athens, 1903-2004) was one of the most important Greek artists and representatives of the so called “Generation of 1930s” with diverse and internationally recognized work. The work of the artist, who was often called the “eternal teenager”, extends across the unusual vector of time of almost eight decades, and its rich range of subject matter is characterized by incessant renewal. Biography George Zongolopoulos was born on March 1st, 1903, in Deligiorgi Street in the center of Athens, while his place of origin was the village Manna or Markasi in Corinth (as Zongolopoulos narrated to his family the real year of his birth was 1901 and not 1903 as is appeared in all his official documents). He grew up in a family of lawyers that did not encourage him to deal professionally with art, although he showed a special inclination towards painting and drawing from childhood. He served his military service as a sergeant until 1923 and during that period he met his peer and later important Greek architect Patroklos Karantinos, who became one of his closest friends and colleagues. First years of apprenticeship o National Technical University of Athens, Athens School of Fine Arts (1924-1930) In 1924 he entered the Athens School of Fine Arts and studied sculpture under Academician Thomas Thomopoulos. In his student years he expressed with militancy his opinion on the need for modernization and reorganization of teaching, and also on the need to increase the School‟s budget. His attitude towards the academicism of the School and his participation in the “occupation” of the School by its students in 1929 meant for the young Zongolopoulos expulsion from the School for a year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Sale
    athens nicosia The Greek Sale tuesday 26 november 2019 The Greek Sale nicosia tuesday 26 november, 2019 2 athens nicosia AUCTION Tuesday 26 November 2019, at 7.30 pm THE LANDMARK NICOSIA, 98 Arch. Makarios III Avenue managing partner Marinos Vrachimis partner Dimitris Karakassis london representative Makis Peppas viewing - ATHENS athens representative Marinos Vrachimis KING GEORGE HOTEL, Syntagma Square for bids and enquiries mob. +357 99582770 mob. +30 6944382236 thursday 14 to saturday 16 november 2019, 10 am to 9 pm email: [email protected] to register and leave an on-line bid www.fineartblue.com viewing - NICOSIA catalogue design Miranda Violari THE LANDMARK NICOSIA, 98 Arch. Makarios III Avenue photography Vahanidis Studio, Athens sunday 24 to monday 25 november 2019, 10 am to 9 pm tuesday 26 november 2019, 10 am to 6 pm exhibition instalation / art transportation MoveArt insurance Lloyds, Karavias Art Insurance printing Printco Cassoulides Ltd ISBN 978-9963-2497-4-9 01 Nikos KESSANLIS Greek, 1930-2004 Untitled signed lower right mixed media on hardboard 25 x 20 cm PROVENANCE private collection, Athens 1 500 / 2 000 € Nikos Kessanlis was born in Thessaloniki. Between 1944 and 1948 he studied with Yannis Spyropoulos and later enrolled at the School of Fine Arts, Athens in the studio of Yannis Moralis where he graduated in 1955. He continued his studies in Rome, on a scholarship from the Italian government at the Istituto Centrale del Restauro while also taking lessons in mural painting and engraving at the Scuola delle Arti Ornamentali di San Giacomo. In the early 1960s, he moved to Paris and in 1981 returned permanently to Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies Quarterly Journal by DAKAM
    International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies Volume: 3 Number: 1 January -February-March 2018 DAKAM IJAUS International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies Quarterly Journal by DAKAM Volume: 3 Number: 1 January-February-March 2018 [email protected] www.dakam.org/ijaus Firuzaga Mahallesi, Bogazkesen Caddesi No:76 / 8, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkiye Owner: Özgür Öztürk * Editor: Yıldız Aksoy, Asst. Prof. Dr. Publication Coordinator: Efe Duyan, Asst. Prof. Dr Reviewers of the current Issue (in alphabetical order title, surname): Prof. Dr. Ömür Barkul Prof. Dr. Leyla Alpagut Prof. Dr. Havva Alkan Bala Prof. Dr. Gülsüm Baydar Prof. Dr. Eti Akyuz Levi Prof. Dr. Derya Oktay Prof. Dr. Derya Elmalı sen Prof. Dr. Bilge Işık Assoc. Prof. Dr. Yasemen Say Özer Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sanem Özen Turan Assoc. Prof. Dr. Neşe Gurallar Assoc. Prof. Dr. Murat Şahin Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erkan Aydıntan Assoc. Prof. Dr. Alev Erarslan Göçer Asst. Prof. Dr. Yıldız Aksoy Asst. Prof. Dr. Zeynep Yılmaz Bayram Asst. Prof. Dr. Zeynep Yazıcıoğlu Halu Asst. Prof. Dr. Yasemin Sarıkaya Levent 2 IJAUS CONTENTS HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER AS A TOOL FOR MANAGING CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES IN KOSOVO ALBAN MORINA, ERINË MULOLLI, KALTRINA THAÇI, SALİ SHOSHI, NOL BINAKAJ ............................................. 4 TRANSFORMATION PROCESS AND INDUCED COMFORT IN THE OTTOMAN HOUSES MARWA BENCHEKROUN .................................................................................................................................. 15 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN LOW-INCOME COMMUNITY
    [Show full text]
  • El Paisaje Como Obra De Arte Total. Dimitris Pikionis Y El Entorno De La Acrópolis
    37 EL PAISAJE COMO OBRA DE ARTE TOTAL. DIMITRIS PIKIONIS Y EL ENTORNO DE LA ACRÓPOLIS Darío Álvarez Álvarez En 2011 se cumplen sesenta años del inicio, en 1951, del proceso de proyecto y construcción de uno de los paisajes arquitectónicos y culturales más fascinantes del siglo XX, llevado a cabo por el arquitecto griego Dimitris Pikionis en el entorno de la Acrópolis de Atenas. Con la minuciosidad de un artesano, la visión de un artista y la condición proyectual de un arquitecto, Pikionis organizó un sistema en el que se superpone la memoria individual a la memoria universal del lugar. El resultado es un palimpsesto que atraviesa los siglos y se convierte en un paisaje del tiempo, en el que encontramos rastros que nos llevan desde la idea de un paisaje clásico hasta una concepción metafísica, marcado por los trazos vanguardistas de Klee o de Kandinsky, con aires orientales y una cierta condición mística que lo convierten en una obra de arte total. Palabras clave: Pikionis, Acrópolis, Filopapo Keywords: Pikionis, Acrópolis, Filopapo Volviendo la vista atrás a cuanto he hecho en la vida, veo que, como el poeta [Kavafis], “he leído las inscripciones en una piedra antigua” con las letras “desgastadas”. D. Pikionis Fig. 1. Vistas aéreas del entorno de la Acrópolis antes y después de la intervención de Dimitris Pikionis (AA.VV. Dimitris Pikionis, Architect 1887-1968. A sentimental topography, Architectural Association, London, 1989). En 1951 Constantinos Karamanlis, Ministro de Obras Públicas de Grecia, decidió ordenar el entorno de la Acrópolis de Atenas, como parte del proceso general de recuperación de la zona arqueológica del centro de la ciudad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aegean in Greek Artists Maleas, Ghikas and Tetsis
    476 Argyro Loukaki УДК: 7.036 ББК: 85.103(4)6 А43 DOI: 10.18688/aa188-5-46 Argyro Loukaki Cultural and Physical Space as a Condition of Artistic Vision: The Aegean in Greek Artists Maleas, Ghikas and Tetsis The Aegean1 The Aegean is the matrix of Greek civilization and art. Homer’s ‘wine-dark’ sea is the hub of the uninterrupted, vast sequence of Greek civilizations as their referential and imaginary space. Here the Greek language, thought and social constitution through poetry, philosophical logos, art, architecture, the organization of space following the polis model as a civilizing and participatory condition, plus theatrical experience were cultivated. Civilizing factors facilitated communication and security, which were enhanced by the continuous sight of land within the Aegean ‘garden’, thence mutual observation that promotes dialectical thought, the facility of trade, the visual and psychological sense of isolation and, yet, of easy contact, the availability of fine materials like Parian marble, the temperate climate, plus the landscape plasticity and the geometric precision of strong outlines and colour contrasts. Given this wealth, it is proposed that, to account for the formation of the mental, visual and spatial reflexes, codes, and conventions of three important Modern Greek artists, Konstantinos Maleas (1879–1928), Nikos Hadjikyriakos Ghikas (1906–1994) and Panagiotis Tetsis (1925– 2016), nurturing parameters such as the Aegean and poetry, psychoanalytic aspects of unconscious roots in time and space, personal cultural geographies, and artistic interactions with both the West and the East should be added to the usual analysis of style and iconography. The Generation of the 1930s, to which Ghikas belonged, and which included two Nobel prize winners, the poets George Seferis and Odysseus Elytis, emphasized the importance of the Aegean to Greek culture and poetry, in itself a privileged record of Greek sensitivity and aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Greek Art History
    01 / February 2021 / vol. I / [127—133] Understanding Greek Art History. A Review of: Evgenios Matthiopoulos, ed. Art History in Greece: Selected Essays (Athens: Melissa, 2018). Paperback. 150 pp. ISBN 978-960-204-379 Matthew Rampley ([email protected]) Department of Art History, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic Keywords Hellenism; Greece; Romania; classicism; Byzantine art; nationalism; Nicos Hadjinicolaou; https://doi.org/10.5817/AEC2021-1-6 ( 127 ) Understanding Greek Art History. A Review of: Evgenios Matthiopoulos, ed. Art History in Greece: Selected Essays (Athens: Melissa, 2018). Paperback. 150 pp. ISBN 978-960-204-379 Matthew Rampley For many art history students of a certain generation, courses on art historical method were likely to have included a book titled Art History and Class Struggle.1 An extensive discussion of Marxist art history, it was part of the transformation of art history in the 1970s and early 1980s that saw the appearance of a number of pioneering works of social art history by scholars such as T. J. Clark, Horst Bredekamp and Albert Boime.2 Yet its author, Nicos Hadjinicolaou, remained a largely unknown figure. His book was first published in French in 1973, and by the time it gained wider prominence in English translation, he had already returned to the University of Crete, where he made a reputation as a scholar of El Greco.3 Art History and Class Struggle may have ended up becoming eclipsed by later authors as an exemplar of the social history of art, yet it was testimony to a practice of art history writing in Greece that was, and remains, barely known outside of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimitris Arvanitakis: Head of the Publications Department The
    Dimitris Arvanitakis: Head of the Publications Department Born in Zakynthos, Dimitris Arvanitakis is a graduate of the Department of Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies of the University of Athens. As a fellow of the Academy of Athens from 1995 to 1999, he conducted research for his doctoral dissertation at Istituto di Studi Bizantini e Postbizantini of Venice, which was successfully defended at the Ionian University in Corfu (1999). His scientific interests span a wide range of topics: social history, history of ideas and intellectual history, history of literature and historiography, Modern Greek and Italian history, and the formation of national states. Since 2000, he has been working at the Benaki Museum and since 2006 he has been in charge of the Publications Department. In his capacity as Head of Publications, he has overseen and coordinated the publication of a great number of the Museum’s exhibition and collections catalogues and has been scientific editor of many books, including the series Benaki Museum Library. Dimitris Arvanitakis has taught in postgraduate seminars in Greece and Italy, has organized scientific conferences and has edited a number of scientific volumes. Moreover, he has published many articles in scientific volumes, journals and conference proceedings. He is a member of the Editorial Secretariat of the Greek journal Ta Istorika and the Italian journal Periptero, member of the Review Team of the journal Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana, Scientific Director of the Casa di Ugo Foscolo / Hugo Foscolo’s House (Zakynthos), and since 2009 he has been a Member and Coordinator of the Scientific Committee which oversees the publication of Andreas Kalvos’ Works by the Benaki Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Sale Nicosia Tuesday 1 December 2015
    The Greek Sale nicosia tuesday 1 december 2015 athens london nicosia www.cypria-auctions.com The Greek Sale nicosia tuesday 1 december 2015 previews: athens london nicosia athens london nicosia managing director Ritsa Kyriacou AUCTION marketing & sales director Marinos Vrachimis Tuesday 1 December 2015, at 7 pm auctioneer John Souglides 14 Evrou Street, Strovolos Nicosia, 2003 for bids and enquiries Tel. +357 22341122/23 Mob. +357 99582770 viewing - ATHENS Fax +357 22341124 Email: [email protected] Hotel GRANDE BRETAGNE, Syntagma Square to register and leave an on-line bid www.cypria-auctions.com Friday 23 october - sunday 25 october 10 am to 10 pm catalogue design Miranda Violari viewing - LONDON The CONINGSBY GALLERY, 30 Tottenham Street, London W1T 4RJ english text Marinos Vrachimis Eleni Kyriacou monday 9 november to saturday 14 november 2015, 11 am to 7 pm photography Vahanidis Studio, Athens viewing - NICOSIA Christos Panayides, Nicosia CYPRIA , 14 Evrou Street, Strovolos, Nicosia, 2003 printing Cassoulides MasterPrinters tuesday 24 to monday 30 november 2015, 10 am to 9 pm tuesday 1 december 2015, 10 am to1 pm ISBN 978-1-907983-10-8 8 01 Nikiforos LYTRAS Greek, 1832 -1904 Dog signed lower right pastel on paper 29 x 28 cm PROVENANCE private collection, Athens LITERATURE Nikiforos Lytras, Nelli Missirli, Athens, 2009, National Bank of Greece Editions, no 118, p. 206, illustrated 3 000 / 5 000 € Nikiforos Lytras was born on the island of Tinos in 1832. In 1879 he married Irene Kyriakidi, the daughter of a tradesman from Smyrna, At the age of eighteen he moved to Athens to study at together they had six children.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism As Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse
    Tsiambaos, K. Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2019; 4(1): 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.179 RESEARCH ARTICLE Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse Kostas Tsiambaos National Technical University of Athens, GR [email protected] While the established histories of architectural theory generally focus upon the discourse produced by eminent architects and/or famous scholars, there is another counter-discourse that has developed gradually in the background. This is a discourse against architectural theory, in an effort to undermine theory’s importance, even to eliminate its value, scope and use altogether. Yet this implicit anti-theory – which has slowly but steadily become embedded in the international architectural scene over the last decades – is usually ignored or underestimated by architectural historians. Drawing upon the recent literature on populism (e.g. Arditi, Moffitt, Taggart, Laclau), and also taking into consideration the few, but valuable, recent texts about populism within architecture (e.g. Fausch, Fowler, Shamiyeh, Lootsma), I will argue that a populist trend against theoretical inquiry is nowadays dispersed horizontally, thereby legitimizing particular, even if diverging, research methods and design practices. The fight against intellectualism and the elites, the promoting of a new sense of architectural ‘morality’, the use of simplistic procedures, forms and slogans, are among the many symptoms of a populist mentality that traverses ideological boundaries, social contexts and conflicting political identities, linking dreams of radical communal utopias to fantasies of limitless post-capitalist markets. This essay discusses in particular the ways in which such a counter-theoretical discourse has re-emerged in the last decades among architects in Greece.
    [Show full text]