DOCSLIB.ORG

OI BRASIL HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A., Case No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OI BRASIL HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A., Case No UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR PUBLICATION SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: Chapter 15 OI BRASIL HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A., Case No. 17-11888 (SHL) Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: Chapter 15 OI BRASIL HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A., Case No. 16-11794 (SHL) Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: Chapter 15 OI S.A., et al., Case No. 16-11791 (SHL) Debtors in a Foreign Proceeding. (Jointly Administered) -----------------------------------------------------------x POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM OF DECISION APPEARANCES: JONES DAY Counsel for Jasper R. Berkenbosch, Solely in His Capacity as Insolvency Trustee of Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. 250 Vesey Street New York, New York 10281 By: Corinne Ball, Esq. Stephen Pearson, Esq. Lauri W. Sawyer, Esq. Bryan M. Kotliar, Esq. Anna Kordas, Esq. -and- 51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 By: Geoffrey Irwin, Esq. DECHERT LLP Counsel for the International Bondholder Committee 1095 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036-6797 By: Allan S. Brilliant, Esq. Shmuel Vasser, Esq. Benjamin E. Rosenberg, Esq. WHITE & CASE LLP Counsel for Oi S.A. and Antonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho as Petitioner and Foreign Representative of the RJ Proceeding of Each of Oi S.A., Telemar Norte Leste S.A., Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A., and Oi Móvel S.A. 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020-1095 By: J. Christopher Shore, Esq. John K. Cunningham, Esq. Mark P. Franke, Esq. -and- Southeast Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 4900 Miami, Florida 33131 By: Richard S. Kebrdle, Esq. Jason N. Zakia, Esq. Laura L. Femino, Esq. CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP Counsel for the Steering Committee of the Ad Hoc Group of Bondholders One Liberty Plaza New York, New York 10006 By: Richard J. Cooper, Esq. Luke A. Barefoot, Esq. Samuel Hershey, Esq. SEAN H. LANE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is the Verified Petition and Motion seeking an Order (I) Recognizing the Dutch Bankruptcy Proceeding as the Foreign Main Proceeding for Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. (“Coop” or the “Debtor”); (II) Recognizing the Insolvency Trustee as the Foreign Representative; (III) Modifying the Prior Recognition Order; (IV) Modifying the Prior 2 Joint Administration Order and (V) Granting Certain Related Relief, dated July 7, 2017 (as later supplemented and modified, the “Dutch Petition”) [ECF Nos. 2, 23].1 The Dutch Petition was filed by Jasper R. Berkenbosch, solely in his capacity as Insolvency Trustee of Debtor Coop (the “Insolvency Trustee”). The Dutch Petition presents the Court with a complex factual and procedural history. Coop is a Dutch entity that is part of a family of Brazilian telecommunications companies (the “Oi Group”) that initiated bankruptcy proceedings in Brazil in the summer of 2016. In July 2016, several of these Oi Group entities—including Coop—sought and received recognition in this Court of the Brazilian bankruptcy proceedings as a foreign main proceeding under Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As a basis for that recognition, the Court found Coop’s center of main interests (“COMI”) to be in Brazil given Coop’s status as a special purpose financing vehicle for the Oi Group. Around the same time, a number of Coop’s creditors began to take action against Coop in the Netherlands, which culminated in a Dutch bankruptcy proceeding for Coop. After months of litigation in the Dutch court system, the highest national court in the Netherlands upheld the jurisdiction and propriety of Coop’s bankruptcy proceedings under Dutch law. In July 2017, the Insolvency Trustee appointed in the Netherlands filed the Dutch Petition now before this Court. Contending that Coop’s COMI is in the Netherlands, the Dutch Petition seeks to have the Court recognize Coop’s Dutch bankruptcy proceedings as a foreign main proceeding under Chapter 15 and also to overturn the prior recognition by this Court of Coop’s Brazilian bankruptcy 1 Unless otherwise specified, references to the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) docket are to Case No.17-11888. There is an extensive evidentiary record in this proceeding. Trial testimony is cited as “Trial Tr. [page:line], [date] ([witness]).” Testimony provided by written declaration is cited as “[Witness] Decl. ¶ __.” Testimony on cross-examination provided by written declaration is cited as “[Witness] Cross ¶ __.” Exhibits are cited as “TX __” for the Insolvency Trustee’s exhibits, “IBCX __” for the IBC’s exhibits, “SCX __” for the Steering Committee’s exhibits, and “OX __” for Oi’s exhibits. 3 proceedings. The Insolvency Trustee’s Dutch Petition is supported by Aurelius Capital Management, LP (“Aurelius”) and other like-minded creditors who make up the International Bondholder Committee (the “IBC,” and together with the Insolvency Trustee, the “Movants”). The relief requested by the Movants is opposed by the debtors that previously received recognition of the Brazilian bankruptcy proceedings in this Court. These debtors are joined by a separate group of Oi Group creditors (the “Steering Committee,” and, together with the debtors in the prior case, the “Objectors”). To address the numerous issues presented by the parties, this Decision is divided into sections. The first section sets forth a detailed statement of facts based on the evidence presented in the case, including at trial. The remaining sections are the Court’s conclusions of law based on these facts and applicable law. They open with a brief primer on Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, focusing on recognition and the crucial concept of a debtor’s COMI. The Court next turns to the parties’ competing views of the applicable legal standard for evaluating the Dutch Petition and Coop’s COMI. On the one hand, the Movants urge the Court to conduct a de novo review of Coop’s COMI under Section 1517(a) as of the date the Dutch Petition was filed. On the other hand, the Objectors advocate reviewing this case under Section 1517(d), which looks at whether a prior COMI determination should be terminated or modified because it was incorrect in the first instance or based on events after recognition. For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that Section 1517(d) provides the appropriate standard. After addressing the applicable legal standard, the Court considers whether the doctrines of judicial estoppel and comity apply in this case. More specifically, the Court evaluates whether this Court should conduct its own determination of COMI under Chapter 15 or whether it should defer to prior rulings made by the Dutch courts. The Court ultimately concludes that 4 judicial estoppel and comity should not apply here for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, the differences between the legal question now before this Court and the one decided by the Dutch courts. Finally, the Court evaluates the two prongs of Section 1517(d) for terminating or modifying a prior recognition. The first of these prongs directs the Court to determine whether the grounds for granting recognition were lacking. This requires the Court to examine the record before the Court at the time it recognized Coop’s COMI as Brazil. After determining that the Court should not modify or terminate recognition under the first prong in Section 1517(d), the Court turns to the second prong in Section 1517(d). This second prong examines whether the grounds of recognition have ceased to exist. It requires the Court to examine whether events after the prior recognition have changed Coop’s COMI from Brazil to the Netherlands. In concluding that this second prong has not been met, the Court considers the economic reality of the special purpose nature of Coop, the expectations of creditors, the limitations on the Dutch Insolvency Trustee presented by the proceedings in Brazil, and allegations of impropriety against creditor Aurelius. After a trial and extensive submissions by the parties, the Court denies the Dutch Petition for the reasons set forth below. This decision constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.2 2 Certain information relevant to the Court’s determination in this case is sensitive commercial information or subject to confidentiality restrictions under Dutch law. See Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order [ECF No. 38]; Stipulation Regarding Confidential Dutch Court Proceeding Information [ECF No. 67]; see also Rule 9018 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (permitting protection of, among other things, confidential commercial information). Such confidential information has been redacted from this Decision. Redactions have been kept to a minimum, however, given the interest of transparency in these proceedings. An unredacted version of this Decision has been filed under seal and provided to counsel to the parties that participated in the trial. 5 FINDINGS OF FACT A. The Oi Group’s Background and Structure Incorporated under the laws of Brazil, Oi S.A. (“Oi”) is the parent company of a large telecommunications conglomerate. Proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order, Ex. A Statement of Stipulated Facts (the “Stip. Facts”) ¶ 1 [ECF No. 87]; Declaration of Antonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho (“Rabelo Decl.”) ¶ 6 [ECF No. 59]. The Oi Group has 140,000 direct and indirect employees in Brazil, including 45,125 full-time employees, as of December 31, 2015. Rabelo Decl. ¶ 5. The Oi Group reports significant operations and market share in a range of telecommunications-related services in Brazil, including (i) operation of 651,000 public telephones, more than one million public Wi-Fi hotspots in locations such as airports and shopping malls, and 330,000 kilometers of fiber optic cables; (ii) a 34.5% market share of fixed- line services including network usage, television and data transmission; and (iii) an 18.6% national market share in mobile telecommunications with 48.1 million mobile subscribers as of December 31, 2015, and network coverage of approximately 93.0% of the urban population of Brazil.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Latin America: Mobile Deals Spur M&A Activity
    4 Global Media and Communications Quarterly Autumn Issue 2012 Latin America: Mobile Deals Spur M&A Activity The Latin American telecommunications market In December 2011, Sky Brasil (a Brazil-based has witnessed several substantial developments subsidiary of DirecTV), announced the purchase of in the past twelve months, particularly in the areas Acom Comunicações, a Brazilian television and of wireless and 4G. In particular, rising demand for internet company, for US$55 million. Completion of more widespread access to 4G and other wireless the acquisition is still pending, subject to antitrust and services has driven consolidation activity in the Latin communications regulatory approvals. This deal is part telecoms market. This article briefly describes some of Sky Brasil’s overall strategy to enhance its new 4G developments and representative transactions of the operations and to expand its services to other parts of past 12 months in Brazil, Columbia, Mexico, and Haiti. Brazil. By acquiring Acom Comunicações, Sky Brasil will acquire new 4G wireless spectrum in ten states As the economy of Brazil continues to expand, internet covering fifty major municipalities, to complement use and access continues to be a significant focus the airwaves it acquired in the June auction. of activity. Online commerce in Brazil has increased 21% since 2011 (to approximately US$18.7 billion), Outside of Brazil, other recent investments have and the forecast is for internet penetration to increase demonstrated a trend towards greater industry by the end of 2012 to over 86 million people, or 42% consolidation. In Mexico, Televisa recently completed of the population. As the demand for internet access a deal to acquire a 50% stake in Grupo Iusacell, a grows, the government is focusing increasing efforts Mexican mobile operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Claims That the Open Internet Order Impaired Investment Lack Any Sound Theoretical Or Factual Basis
    Claims That the Open Internet Order Impaired Investment Lack Any Sound Theoretical or Factual Basis ISPs and their advocates—acknowledged and unacknowledged—have made and reiterated claims that the 2015 Open Internet Order (OI Order) has impaired ISPs’ investments since February 2015, when the OI Order was adopted. Those assertions are incorrect as a matter of theory and as a matter of fact. Every commercial enterprise’s decision to invest and the level of investment undertaken reflects a wide range of factors, including general economic conditions, the cost of capital, the completion of major programs (for example—network upgrades such as LTE), known uncertainties (for example—the lack of standards for future network upgrades such as 5G), and demand forecasts. In other words, investment decisions are never a function of a single factor. There are techniques that enable analysts to identify major influences with respect to investment and changes in valuation. These techniques, often called “impact evaluations,” require a significant amount of data and, even when the requisite data are available, often lead to controversial conclusions. While it is impossible to conduct an impact evaluation in the close aftermath of a triggering event such as the OI Order, examination of major ISPs’ statements regarding their investment undermines industry partisans’ “instant analysis” claims regarding the impact of the OI Order on investment. ***** The OI Order was designed to ensure that Americans reap the economic, social, and civic benefits of an open Internet both today and in the future. Assessing whether the adopted net neutrality regulations have succeeded at doing so, without unduly affecting the dynamic incentives of providers to invest in service quality, is a difficult, yet important, policy evaluation question.
    [Show full text]
  • Betting on Digital
    Digital Evolution: Oi case study A report from The Economist Intelligence Unit Betting on digital The successful launch of an online portal has given telecommunications company Oi the confidence to pursue an ambitious digital transformation initiative For many organisations, the impetus for digital transformation comes from customer demand. As The Economist Intelligence Unit identified in its “Digital Evolution” research project, sponsored by Accenture and Pegasystems, 50% of companies involved in digital transformation initiatives cite “evolving customer needs” as a key driver. Global telecommunications giant Oi is a case in point. Five years ago Oi—the largest telecoms company in Brazil, South Africa and Portugal—began a journey to transform the way in which it interacts with customers through digital means. “For us, digital transformation means being able to provide a seamless experience, no matter the device; experiences that are easy to use, fast and fun,” says Abel Camargo, the company’s digital director. However, as Mr Camargo explains, this transformation has challenged the organisation to rethink not just its customer-facing technologies but also its organisational structure and business-process Sponsored by 1 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2016 Digital Evolution: Oi case study ❛❛ design. “It also means excelling in both digital and leadership capabilities, rethinking and improving Digital business processes, customer engagements and business models,” he notes. transformation And while it is by no means easy, the organisational
    [Show full text]
  • Owner's Manual for Advanced Features
    Owner’s Manual for advanced features Digital Camera Model No. DMC-TS4 Before connecting, operating or adjusting this product, please read the instructions completely. VQT4E09 F0112MG0 until 2012/2/22 Contents Playing Back Pictures ([Normal Play]).....40 • Selecting a picture.............................40 • Displaying Multiple Screens Before Use (Multi Playback) ................................41 • Using the Playback Zoom .................41 Care of the camera ...................................5 Playing Back Motion Pictures..................42 (Important) About the Waterproof/ • Creating Still Pictures from a Dustproof and Anti-shock Performance Motion Picture ...................................43 of the Camera ...........................................8 Deleting Pictures .....................................44 Standard Accessories .............................13 • To delete a single picture ..................44 Names of the Components .....................14 • To delete multiple pictures (up to 100) or all the pictures ................................45 Preparation Setting the Menu .....................................46 • Setting menu items ...........................46 Attaching the Strap..................................16 • Using the Quick Menu.......................48 Charging the Battery ...............................17 About the Setup Menu.............................49 • Charging ...........................................17 • Approximate operating time and Recording number of recordable pictures ..........19 Inserting and
    [Show full text]
  • Comcast of Massachusetts I, Inc. Granted by the BOARD of SELECTMEN TOWN of MATTAPOISETT, MASSACHUSETTS
    GRANTED TO Comcast of Massachusetts I, Inc. Granted By THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN TOWN OF MATTAPOISETT, MASSACHUSETTS Renewal Term August 11, 2015 —August 10, 2025 Reitzu~nl CnGle Televisio~t License Grnirted 13r ri,e r~~,~~rt o/'.11attn~oisett, dl.~l Rerreu~al Tern: ,-ltrgtrsi 1!, ?OI? —:fug~zst 10, Z02~ TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS........................................................................................................................................ ~t INTRODUCTION.................................................................................. ........................ ..................5 ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS ..........................................................................................................6 SECTION I.1 —DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................................6 ARTICLE 2 GRANT OF RENEWAL LICENSE ......................................................................11 SECTION 2.1 - GRANT OF RENEWAL LIC~;NSE .......................................................................................11 SECTION 2.2 -TERM: NON-EXCLUSIVITY ...............................................................................................1 I SECTION 2,3 -RENEWAL............................................................................................................................. l 1 SECT[ON 2.~4 -RESERVATION OF AUTHORITY.................... ................................................................... l..~ SECTION 2.5 -NON-EXCLUSIVITY
    [Show full text]
  • Literacy Forum NZ
    Literacy Forum NZ TE KORERO PANUI TUHITUHI O AOTEAROA Vol.34, No. 1, 2019 is published by The New Zealand Literacy Association (Inc.) which is an affiliate of the International Reading Association Literacy Forum NZ is a peer reviewed journal, the official publication of the New Zealand Literacy Association, which is an affiliate of the International Reading Association. It is published three times per year and is free to NZLA members. Subscription cost for non-members is available on application. Ideas and statements expressed in Literacy Forum NZ are not necessarily the official viewpoint of the New Zealand Literacy Association. Editorial Board Glenice Andrews Sue Bridges Trish Brooking Wendy Carss Sue Dymock Joy Hawke Libby Limbrick Wendy Morgan Mal Thompson Editor: Mal Thompson Local Editorial team: Manawatu Literacy Association, led by Sarah McCord and Mal Thompson. The panel of reviewers are members of the NZLA, plus academics and teachers from New Zealand and overseas. Address for correspondence Dr Mal Thompson (General Editor) 178 Burt Street Wakari Dunedin 9010 [email protected] NZLA website: http://www.nzla.org.nz/ Published March 2019 © Copyright NZLA ISSN 2324-3643 CONTENTS From the President .......................................................................................................4 Advocating for children: Not all literacy interventions, approaches and resources are equal Janet S. Gaffney, Suzanne Smith, Frances Commack, Annabelle Ash, Margot Mackie, Sonia Mudgway ...........................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Altice Signs Definitive Agreement with Oi to Acquire Portugal Telecom
    Altice signs definitive agreement with Oi to acquire Portugal Telecom December 9, 2014 - Altice (Euronext: ATC) announces that it has signed a definitive agreement with Oi to purchase the Portuguese assets of Portugal Telecom. These assets comprise the existing business of Portugal Telecom outside of Africa and excludes Portugal Telecom's Rio Forte debt securities, Oi treasury shares and Portugal Telecom financing vehicles. As previously stated, the transaction values Portugal Telecom at an enterprise value of €7.4bn on a cash and debt-free free basis which includes €500m consideration related to the future revenue generation of Portugal Telecom. The transaction, net of financial debt, accrued post-retirement liabilities and other purchase price adjustments will be financed by new debt and existing cash from Altice. The transaction requires corporate approvals and will be subject to standard regulatory approvals for a transaction of this nature. Contacts Investor Relations Richard Williams: +44 (0)7946 348939 / [email protected] Media Arthur Dreyfuss: +41 79 946 49 31 / [email protected] About Altice Founded by telecom entrepreneur, Patrick Drahi, Altice is a multinational cable and telecommunications company with presence in three regions-Western Europe (comprising France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Portugal and Switzerland), Israel and the Overseas Territories (currently comprising the French Caribbean and the Indian Ocean regions and the Dominican Republic). We provide cable based services (high quality pay television, fast broadband Internet and fixed line telephony) and, in certain countries, mobile telephony services to residential and corporate customers. Altice (ATC) is listed on NYSE Euronext Amsterdam, ISIN LU1014539529. 1 Disclaimer Matters discussed in this release may constitute or include forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Web Release, May 21, 2019
    YOF CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT VANCOUVER Access to Information &-Privacy File No.: 04-1000-20-2018-659 May 21, 2019 Re: Request for Access to Records under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the ''Act") I am responding to your request of December 18, 2018 for: All City documentation related to the following Development Permit applications that were submitted in February 2018: 1. 768 Seymour Street, DP-2017-00433, 2. -51 0 West Georgia Street, DP-2017-00387, and 3. 777 Richards Street, DP-2017-00388. Date Range� February 1, 2017 to December 17, 2018. All responsive records are attached. Under section 52 of the Act, and within 30 business days of receipt of this letter, you may ask the Information & Privacy Commissioner to review any matter related to the City's response to your FOi request by writing to: Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner, [email protected] or by phoning 250-387-5629. If you request a review, please provide the Commissioner's office with: 1) the request number (#04-1000-20-2018-659); 2) a copy of this letter; 3) a copy of your original request; -and 4) detailed reasons why you are seeking the review. Yours truly, Barbara J, Van Fraassen, BA Director, Access to Information & Privacy [email protected] 453 W 12th Avenue Vancouver BC V5Y 1 V4 City Hall 453 West 12th Avenue Vancouver BC V5Y 1V4 vancouver.ca City Clerk's Department tel: 604.829.2002 fax: 604.873.7419 *If you have any questions, please email us at [email protected] and we will respond to you as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Deal News / Brazil – Oi SA
    EMERGING MARKETS RESTRUCTURING JOURNAL ISSUE NO. 6 — SPRING 2018 DEAL NEWS / BRAZIL Oi S.A.: The Saga of Latin America’s Largest Private Sector In-court Restructuring By JESSE W. MOSIER After a nearly 2-year long process, creditors of Oi of substantively consolidated restructuring plans, S.A. (“Oi”) and certain of its subsidiaries approved (ii) the attempt (ultimately abandoned) by certain a plan of reorganization at a creditors meeting creditors to use the existence of intercompany on December 19, 2017, held in a former Olympic claims by off-shore finance subsidiaries to improve boxing venue on the outskirts of Rio de Janeiro, to their recoveries, (iii) potential limits on abusive restructure nearly US$20 billion in claims, the largest behavior by Brazilian shareholders and their board corporate restructuring in the history of Latin representatives and (iv) the treatment of regulatory America (and potentially any emerging market), claims in Brazilian restructuring proceedings. and the first truly public Brazilian company to go through judicial restructuring since Brazil reformed its insolvency laws in 2005. Background Oi is one of the most important companies in In the wake of its unsuccessful acquisition of Brazil, and is one of the largest Brazilian integrated Portugal Telecom, structural problems resulting telecommunications providers, with over 60 million from its concessions, substantial underinvestment customers throughout Brazil and over 138,000 direct in its assets and a general downturn in the Brazilian and indirect employees. Oi also has operations in economy, by early 2016 Oi was facing an unsus- a number of other Portuguese speaking countries tainable debt burden.
    [Show full text]
  • Release Management Workshop
    Обзор функциональности новых релизов StarOS и Cisco Ultra Services Platform Семинар Cisco для сотрудников ПАО “МТС” Александр Фелижанко, Ведущий консультант по технологиям Sergey Seperovich, Consulting Systems Engineer / Beratung Systemingenieur Октябрь 2016 Содержание • Обзор функциональности новых релизов StarOS • Обзор Cisco Ultra Services Platform Обзор функциональности новых релизов StarOS Электрон так же неисчерпаем, как и атом, природа бесконечна, но она бесконечно существует так же, как и Cisco StarOS Ленин В. И. Материализм и эмпириокритицизм: Критические заметки об одной реакционной философии. - М.: Звено, 1909. - 251 с. Глава V. Новейшая революция в естествознании и философский идеализм. Интеллектуальная пакетная опорная сеть Cisco Уникальная функциональность StarOS на различных аппаратных платформах Enhanced Charging (Multiple Integrated Policy and Packet Inspection – SPI/DPI Charging Records) Charging Enforcement (PCEF) Application Detection and Content Filtering – Integrated Встроенные URL Blacklisting Control (ADC/P2P) or ICAP based (In-line) HTTP Header Enrichment and Statefull Firewall (SFW) DNS Snooping сервисы Encryption Network Address Translation Tethering Detection Mobile Video Gateway (NAT) IMS Применение политик и правил Сетевое Управление P-CSCF, I-CSCF, S-CSCF, тарификации (PCEF) на внешней Аварии, статистика, мониторинг Сетевые E-CSCF, A-BG платформе – IPSG Функции LTE Small Cell Gateway CDMA GSM / UMTS WiMAX MME, SGW, H(e)NBGW, SeGW, ePDG, PDSN, HA, SGSN, GGSN ASN GW PGW/LMA, SAEGW SaMOG GW, TTG/PDG HSGW • Специализированные
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Network Codes (MNC) for the International Identification Plan for Public Networks and Subscriptions (According to Recommendation ITU-T E.212 (09/2016))
    Annex to ITU Operational Bulletin No. 1111 – 1.XI.2016 INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION TSB TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION BUREAU OF ITU __________________________________________________________________ Mobile Network Codes (MNC) for the international identification plan for public networks and subscriptions (According to Recommendation ITU-T E.212 (09/2016)) (POSITION ON 1 NOVEMBER 2016) __________________________________________________________________ Geneva, 2016 Mobile Network Codes (MNC) for the international identification plan for public networks and subscriptions Note from TSB 1. A centralized List of Mobile Network Codes (MNC) for the international identification plan for public networks and subscriptions has been created within TSB. 2. This List of Mobile Network Codes (MNC) is published as an annex to ITU Operational Bulletin No. 1111 of 1.XI.2016. Administrations are requested to verify the information in this List and to inform ITU on any modifications that they wish to make. The notification form can be found on the ITU website at www.itu.int/itu-t/inr/forms/mnc.html . 3. This List will be updated by numbered series of amendments published in the ITU Operational Bulletin. Furthermore, the information contained in this Annex is also available on the ITU website at www.itu.int/itu-t/bulletin/annex.html . 4. Please address any comments or suggestions concerning this List to the Director of TSB: International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Director of TSB Tel: +41 22 730 5211 Fax: +41 22 730 5853 E-mail: [email protected] 5. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this List do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ITU concerning the legal status of any country or geographical area, or of its authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • ATT 1Q21 Earnings.Pdf
    2021 1ST QUARTER EARNINGS AT&T Investor Update April 22, 2021 © 2021 AT&T Intellectual Property. AT&T, Globe logo, and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners Cautionary Language Concerning Forward-looking Statements Information set forth in this presentation contains financial estimates and other forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results might differ materially. A discussion of factors that may affect future results is contained in AT&T’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. AT&T disclaims any obligation to update and revise statements contained in this presentation based on new information or otherwise. This presentation may contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations between the non-GAAP financial measures and the GAAP financial measures are available on slide 11 of this presentation and on the company’s website at https://investors.att.com. 2 April 22, 2021 / © 2021 AT&T Intellectual Property - AT&T Proprietary Our Our Deliberate Market Focus 2021 Priority Capital Allocation Broadband connectivity Investing in strategic growth – 5G, Fiber 5G, Fiber, HBO Max GROW Committed to sustaining dividend Software-based at current levels entertainment Customer HBO Max Relationships Utilizing cash after dividends to reduce debt Fantastic storytelling Industry leader for Continued portfolio review – 2020 Emmy wins restructuring non-core
    [Show full text]