DOCSLIB.ORG

Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook United States Department of ERSAgriculture Sugar and Sweetener Economic Research Service SSS-230 January 2001 Situation and Outlook Report U.S. sugar production Mil. short tons, raw value 10 8 Total 6 Beet sugar 4 Cane sugar 2 0 1985/86 88/89 91/92 94/95 97/98 2000/01 2000/01 projected. Source: Economic Research Service, USDA. Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, January 2001, SSS-230. Contents Summary . .3 U.S. Sugar . .5 Year Ended, FY 2000 . .5 Prices . .6 Current Year, FY 2001 . .6 High Fructose Corn Syrup . .12 Special Article U.S. Sugar Price Indices and Stocks-to-Use Ratios . .14 List of Tables . .23 List of Figures . .24 Internet Access to Sugar-Related Data . .70 Report Coordinator Stephen Haley (202) 694-5247 FAX (202) 694-5884 E-mail: [email protected] Principal Contributors Stephen Haley Nydia Suarez Karen Ackerman Database Coordinator/Graphics & Table Design Fannye Lockley-Jolly Editor Martha R. Evans Layout & Text Design Wynnice Pointer-Napper Approved by the World Agricultural Outlook Board. The Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook is pub- Summary released January 25, 2001. The summary of lished two times a year and supplemented by a yearbook. To the next Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook is order, call 1-800-999-6779 in the United States or Canada. scheduled for release on May 24, 2001. Summaries and full Other areas please call (703) 605-6220. Or write ERS- text of Situation and Outlook reports may be accessed elec- NASS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. tronically via the ERS website at www.ers.usda.gov The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, reli- gion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 n Sugar and Sweetener/SSS-230/January 2001 Economic Research Service/USDA Summary The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported the Louisiana cane sugar production is projected at 1.570 mil- impact of the Payment-in-Kind (PIK) Diversion Program lion STRV. Although sugarcane area harvested has increased on fiscal year (FY) 2001 sugarbeet and beet sugar produc- 35,000 acres over last year, sugarcane production is esti- tion in the October 2000 Crop Production report and the mated down 275,000 STRV due to a continuing lack of ade- October World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates quate moisture. Sugar recovery is expected to be 5 percent (WASDE) report. Sugarbeet area harvested fell by 101,600 lower than last year. Hawaii cane sugar production for FY acres, or about 7 percent from the September 1 forecast; 2001 is projected at 265,000 STRV. One of the three and sugarbeet production dropped by 2.030 million tons, or remaining Hawaiian sugar companies ceased operations in about 6 percent lower than its September 1 forecast. November 2000, and one of the other companies closed a National yield was forecast upward by 0.2 ton per acre. The processing facility. production of beet sugar was reduced by 320,000 short tons, raw value (STRV), or by 6.9 percent from the Sugar imports under the raw and refined sugar tariff-rate September WASDE. quotas (TRQs) are currently projected at 1.275 million STRV. As of January 8, 2001, sugar imports under the TRQs Total sugar production in FY 2001 is presently projected at have amounted to 317,703 STRV, or about 25 percent of the 8.538 million STRV, down 130,000 tons from the December amount projected to enter for FY 2001. Sugar imports out- projection, and 6 percent lower than the FY 2001 estimate. side the sugar TRQ for FY 2001 are projected to total 515,000 STRV, including 365,000 STRV under the com- Beet sugar production for FY 2001 is currently projected at bined Refined Sugar Re-export Program, the Sugar- 4.370 million STRV. Sugarbeet production is forecast at Containing Products Program, and the Polyhydric Alcohol 32.521 million tons, about 3 percent lower than last year. Program. The USDA projects an increase in U.S. sugar sup- Area harvested is estimated at 1.378 million acres. The yield ply to 125,000 STRV as a result of sugar syrup imports estimate is 23.6 tons per acre, a record. Based on historical under HTS 1702.90.40. High-tier tariff sugar imports for FY relationships, it is projected that beets sliced during the cur- 2001 are projected to increase to 25,000 STRV, up from rent crop year will exceed 30.4 million tons, or about 3.7 6,000 STRV in FY 2000. percent less than last year. Based on to-date sugar recovery rates and their average relationship with respect to the final Sugar exports under the Refined Sugar Re-export Program sugar recovery rate, it is projected that the final recovery for FY 2001 are projected at 175,000 STRV. Deliveries to rate, net of sugar from molasses, will equal 270 pounds per domestic food and other products manufacturers under the sliced ton, down 24 pounds from last year. This rate, along Sugar-Containing Products Re-export Program are projected with a projection for sugar recovered from molasses, implies at 125,000 STRV. Deliveries for the Polyhydric Alcohol sugar production for FY 2001 of 4.37 million STRV, or Program are projected at 15,000 STRV. about 12 percent less than last year. Total deliveries for FY 2001 are projected at 10.385 million Cane sugar production for FY 2001 is projected at 4.168 STRV. After netting out deliveries made for the Sugar- million STRV, about 2.5 percent above the estimated total Containing Products and Polyhydric Alcohol Programs, for FY 2000. Production increases in Florida (154,000 along with deliveries for livestock feeding (20,000 STRV), STRV), Texas (75,000 STRV), and Puerto Rico (19,000 domestic food and beverage deliveries are projected at STRV) are expected to more than offset declines in 10.225 million, about 2.3 percent higher than FY 2000. Louisiana (92,000 STRV) and Hawaii (53,000 STRV). Ending stocks are currently projected at 1.987 million Florida cane sugar production is projected at 2.130 million STRV, for an ending stocks-to-use ratio of 18.8 percent. Of STRV. The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) the total, the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) owns estimates sugarcane production at 664,000 tons more than 793,555 STRV or 39.9 percent of total projected ending last year. Sugar recovery to date has been at a record high, stocks. The ratio of privately-held ending stocks-to-use is implying that the season-average recovery rate will likely projected at 12.5 percent. approach 13.2 percent. Texas cane sugar production is pro- jected at 180,000 STRV. NASS estimates Texas area of sug- The CCC acquired 793,669 STRV in October as a result of arcane for sugar and seed at 46,600 acres, up 15,600 acres loan forfeitures. Adding this amount to what the CCC had from last year. Yield is estimated at 37.7 tons per acre and already owned (296,649 STRV) gave them a pre-PIK the crop is estimated at 1.734 million STRV. Puerto Rico Diversion dispersal total of 1,090,318 STRV. On December 1, sugar production for FY 2001 is projected at 22,500 STRV. 2000, the CCC transferred title to 277,349 tons of refined It is expected that the two sugar mills on the island will be crystalline sugar to participating producers, or their assignees. back in production this year. Economic Research Service/USDA Sugar and Sweetener/SSS-230/January 2001 n 3 The acres diverted from production by the PIK program rep- current trends continue, it is likely that total HFCS deliver- resent about 7 percent of acreage planted to sugarbeets. ies for 2001 will be only 1.1 percent higher than levels in 2000. Prospects for HFCS-42 are for little to no growth, Domestic deliveries of HFCS-42 in 2000 are forecast at while HFCS-55 deliveries may grow as much as 1.7 percent. 3.562 million tons, dry basis, about the same level as last Much will depend on developments in the soft drink indus- year. Domestic deliveries of HFCS-55 are forecast at 5.603 try where sales growth diminished from the high levels from million tons, dry basis, about 30,000 tons less than last year. most of the 1990’s. These levels represent a major downturn for the industry. If 4 n Sugar and Sweetener/SSS-230/January 2001 Economic Research Service/USDA U.S. Sugar On January 11, 2001, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Sugar exports under the Refined Sugar Re-export Program (USDA) released its latest supply and use estimates for fis- are estimated to have been 124,000 STRV. Total deliveries cal year (FY) 2000 and projections for FY 2001. for domestic food and beverage uses, re-exported products, polyhydric alcohol, and feed uses are estimated at 10.111 Year Ended, FY 2000 million STRV, only marginally above the previous year’s total.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sugar & Sweeteners Outlook
    Economic Research Service Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook Situation and Outlook Michael McConnell, coordinator [email protected] SSS-M-322 Stephanie Riche, contributor June 16, 2015 [email protected] Improved Production Prospects for 2015/16 Reduce the Demand for Imports The next release is July 16, 2015 -------------- The USDA increased projections of 2014/15 sugar production by 33,000 short tons, raw Approved by the value (STRV) to 8.560 million based on the improved outlook for early beet harvest for the World Agricultural 2015/16 crop. Projected imports are increased 58,000 STRV based on a reallocation of the Outlook Board. raw sugar TRQ by the U.S. Trade Representative, reducing expected shortfall. Total use for 2014/15 is reduced 109,000 STRV based on pace-to-date food deliveries reported through April—particularly due to lower direct consumption imports since the beginning of the fiscal year. The projected stocks-to-use ratio is currently 15.0 percent, up from 13.2 percent the previous month. The improved outlook for the 2015/16 sugarbeet crop also resulted in a 270,000 STRV increase in projected 2015/16 sugar production. Projected food deliveries for 2015/16 are reduced 110,000 STRV to reflect the reduction in the current year’s outlook. Projected imports from Mexico in 2015/16 are reduced by 595,000 STRV, as the reductions in other supplies and total use reduces the calculation of U.S. Needs, as defined in the agreement to suspend the countervailing duty investigation signed between the U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) and the Government of Mexico in December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Sweeteners
    Natural Sweeteners Why do we crave sweets? Are there times when you absolutely crave chocolates, candies, or cakes? The average American consumes well over 20 teaspoons of added sugar on a daily basis, which adds up to an average of 142 pounds of sugar per person, per year!1 That’s more than two times what the USDA recommends. Below you will find information on natural sweeteners, all of which are less processed than refined white sugar, and create fewer fluctuations in blood sugar levels. Although these sweeteners are generally safer alternatives to white sugar, they should only be used in moderation. Agave Nectar Agave nectar, or agave syrup, is a natural liquid sweetener made from the juice of the agave cactus. Many diabetics use agave nectar as an alternative to refined sugars and artificial sweeteners because of its relatively low effect on blood glucose levels2. However, agave is high in fructose and has been under much scrutiny due to possible manufacturing processes which are similar to that of high fructose corn syrup. Some research suggests that fructose affects the hormone lepitin, which controls your appetite and satiety. Too much fructose may result in overeating and weight gain, so it’s important to consume agave nectar in reasonable moderation3. Barley Malt Barley malt syrup is a thick, sticky, brown sweetener and is about half as sweet as refined white sugar. It is made from the soaking, sprouting, mashing, cooking and roasting of barley. Many consumers prefer this natural sweetener because it moves through the digestive system slower than other refined sugars4.
    [Show full text]
  • ? a History of Sugar Marketing Through 1974
    s- > ? A HISTORY OF SUGAR MARKETING THROUGH 1974 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE / ECONOMICS, STATISTICS, AND COOPERATIVES SERVICE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REPORT NO. 382 ABSTRACT The quota system of regulating the production, importation, and marketing of sugar in the United States through 1974 was an outgrowth of Government regulation of the sugar trade dating from colonial times. Similar systems have developed in most other countries, particu- larly those which import sugar. The U.S. Sugar Quota System benefited domestic sugar pro- ducers by providing stable prices at favorable levels. These prices also encouraged the produc- tion and use of substitute sweeteners, particularly high fructose and glucose sirup and crystalline dextrose in various industries. But sugar is still the most widely used sweetener in the United States, although its dominant position is being increasingly threatened. KEYWORDS: Sugar, quota, preference, tariff, refined, raw, sweeteners, corn sweeteners. world trade. PREFACE This report was written in 1975 by Roy A. Ballinger, formerly an agricultural economist in the Economic Research Service. It supersedes A History of Sugar Marketing, AER-197, also by Ballinger, issued in February 1971 and now out of print. On January 1, 1978, three USDA agencies—the Economic Research Service, the Statistical Reporting Service, and the Farmer Cooperative Service—merged into a new organization, the Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service. Washington, DC. 20250 March 1978 CONTENTS Page Summary j¡ Introduction 1 Sugar Before the Discovery of America 1 The Colonial Period in the Americas 2 Sugar from 1783 to 1864 5 Developments in the Latter 19th Century g Changes in U.S. Sugar Trade Following the Spanish-American War and During 1900-15 15 Sugar During World War I 20 Price Fluctuations and Higher Tariffs 23 Sugar Quotas Prior to World War II 32 Sugar During World War II 39 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Substitution of Sucrose with Date Palm (Phoenix Dactylifera
    cess Pro ing d & o o T F e c f h o n l Nwanekezi et al., J Food Process Technol 2015, 6:9 o a l Journal of Food n o r g u DOI: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000484 y o J ISSN: 2157-7110 Processing & Technology Research Article Open Access Effect of Substitution of Sucrose with Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera) Fruit on Quality of Bread Nwanekezi EC*, Ekwe CC and Agbugba RU Department of Food science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Imo State University, Owerri, Sudan Abstract The proximate, physical and sensory analysis of bread samples produced by substituting the level of sucrose with date palm fruit pulp (50:0 g, 37.5:12.5 g, 25:25 g, 12.5:37.5 g and 0.50 g) was investigated. The proximate analysis revealed that the protein, moisture, ash, crude fiber and fat contents increased with increase in the level of the date palm fruit pulp. There were increases in the levels of nutrients which ranged from 15.19-19.43% (protein), 1.65-4.43% (crude fiber), 2.44-4.11% (ash) and 28.19-28.92% (moisture). However, there was decrease in the level of carbohydrate content from 45.39 to 35.13% as the level of date palm pulp increased. The specific volume also decreased as the level of the date palm fruit increased ranging from3.12 cm3/g to 2.93 cm3/g; the addition of date palm fruit pulp had no effect on the loaf volumes which ranged from 1920.1 to 1925.0 cm3.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release(16)07
    International Sugar Organization 1 Canada Square Canary Wharf London E14 5AA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Press Release(16)06 (English only) 4 April 2016 “Soft-Drink Makers Have New Secret Ingredient: Sugar!” Dear Colleagues and Friends, The Executive Director would like to draw the your attention to the article below by Anne Marie Chaker from the Wall Street Journal, which highlights the increasing appeal of natural sugar for soft-drink producers. In light of the constant barrage of attacks in the media against sugar consumption, it’s very interesting to receive this kind of news. Soft-Drink Makers Have New Secret Ingredient: Sugar! To boost flagging soda sales, companies are touting ‘real sugar’ as an appeal to all things natural. Sugar is infiltrating the soda aisle, as manufacturers try to boost soft drink sales by losing high fructose syrup. WSJ's Anne-Marie Chaker joins Lee Hawkins to discuss. ANNE MARIE CHAKER Soft-drink makers have a new way to pitch their sweet beverages: They contain sugar. Boylan Bottling Co.’s line of a dozen soda flavors touts “cane sugar” in capital letters on the label. Puck’s fountain sodas, available at restaurant chains in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., say they are made with “bagged sugar from cane.” This week, PepsiCo is rolling out a line of soda the company says is inspired by the original cola formula created by its founder in 1893. Cans list “real sugar” among the ingredients. New television ads to launch next week will feature a sommelier in a leather chair swirling the soft drink in a brandy glass before chugging it.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Sugar Marketing Through 1974
    A HISTORY OF SUGAR MF.RKETING THROUGH 1974 14d :: ' t.,\; "''',.':- · ' ''t,: " '"' ,,.,· .........~.~, ~'"~ ,'~-''~~''', ' ' .. ~,~. ,..'... I;."', · , .;~.~'~, .'k'"" :O ,... ' :,'~.~..: I <' '". - . L~b~ I .. ' ', '.;., U..DEATEN FAGIUTUEECNMCS TTITC, N COEATVSSEVC AGR~~~~~ICUTRLEOOICRPR O 8 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMICS. STATISTICS, AND COOPERATIVES SERVICE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REPORT NO. 382 ABSTRACT The quota system of regulating the production, importation, and marketing of sugar in the United States through 1974 was an outgrowth of Government regulation of the sugar trade dating from colonial times. Similar systems have developed in most other countries, particu- larly those which import sugar. The U.S. Sugar Quota System benefited domestic sugar pro- ducers by providing stable prices at favorable levels. These prices also encouraged the produc- tion and use of substitute sweeteners, particularly high fructose and glucose sirup and crystalline dextrose in various industries. But sugar is still the most widely used sweetener in the United States, although its dominant position is being increasingly threatened. KEYWORDS: Sugar, quota, preference, tariff, refined, raw, sweeteners, corn sweeteners, world trade. PREFACE This report was written in 1975 by Roy A. Ballinger, formerly an agricultural economist in the Economic Research Service. It supersedes A History of Sugar Marketing, AER-197, also by Ballinger, issued in February 1971 and now out of print. On January 1, 1978, three USDA agencies-the Economic Research Service, the Statistical Reporting Service, and the Farmer Cooperative Service-merged into a new organization, the Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service. Washington, D.C. 20250 March 1978 CONTENTS Page Summary ........................................ ii Introduction ........................................................... 1 Sugar Before the Discovery of America ....................................... 1 The Colonial Period in the Americas .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Facts on Refined Sugar and Label Reading
    FACTS ON REFINED SUGAR AND LABEL READING There is evidence that refined sugar contributes to tooth decay, obesity, nutrient deficiencies, and hypoglycemia. It appears to play a role in increasing total cholesterol levels, decreasing HDL (good cholesterol) levels and in the development of diabetes. Refined sugars, along with chemical additives such as artificial colors and flavors are also suspected of causing behavioral problems in children. Various studies in public schools have demonstrated that classroom performance has improved when junk food was taken out of their school lunch program. According to figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), consumption of various sweeteners, often in calorie-dense foods and drinks, has risen in the United States from an estimated 113 pounds per person in 1966 to 147 pounds in 2001. Sugar affects people in different ways. Sugar provides empty (non-nutritive) calories. In the refining process, it is stripped of all its vitamins and minerals. Then, after consuming it, we must use some of these very nutrients to metabolize it. Because it is so addictive and so available it is not easy to remove from our diets. Refined sugar shows up in so many foods on the supermarket shelf – foods like spaghetti sauce, salad dressing, crackers, breads, canned soups and vegetables. It is EVERYWHERE. Refined sugar is often responsible for many common chronic complaints. If you remove it from your diet for just 2- 3 weeks, you may be amazed to find that some of your long-standing symptoms will disappear. Energy, joint or muscle pains may improve, headaches may disappear, you may sleep better, and your stomach may no longer rumble and bloat.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Sugar Challenge Rules
    ST. PETER'S HEALTH WELLNESS 2ND ANNUAL 31-DAY SUGAR CHALLENGE RULES AND GUIDELINES Who’s ready for a reset?! Or, perhaps you’re wanting more energy, along with better sleep?! Even better – do you want to rid yourself of the cravings you have for sugar-laden foods? Would you like to be able to resist the temptations of junk food? Regardless of the reasons why you might consider a 31-day detox – you will feel GREAT if you partake! Join me by registering before Jan. 1 at sphealth.org/sugarchallenge. WHY JOIN? Added sugar (not to be confused with natural sugars found in wholesome foods) is the single biggest diet issue in most people’s lives. If you’re like most people, you’re consuming far more added sugar than the recommended daily amount – and it seriously affecting your health. Taking control and being in control is key! WHO SHOULD JOIN? EVERYONE can benefit from a sugar challenge – especially after holidays celebrations and indulgence. Sugar has been called the tobacco of the new century and the average American consumes three times the maximum daily recommended amount (6 to 9 tsp/day is recommended and we are consuming over 22 tsp/day. WHOA!) WHAT IS THE SUGAR CHALLENGE? Unless all of your meals are made by scratch and you’re aware of every ingredient going into your meals, you can be sure that over half of the normal grocery store fare has added sugar. Sure…it’s easy to note that foods like soda, cookies have sugar – but sugar is FLAVOR and also used to increase shelf life.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation Between Amylase Activity
    ition & F tr oo OPEN ACCESS Freely available online u d N f S o c l i e a n n c r e u s o J ISSN: 2155-9600 Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences Research Article Correlation between Amylase Activity & Reducing Sugar Content in Date Fruits: A Case of Increased Amylase Activity with a Proportional Increase in Reducing-Sugar Content of Fruits Saad S. AlQarni* Department of Basic Sciences, College of Science and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU- HS), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT Background: Date palm is considered as one of the essential fruits across various Arab countries, particularly in Saudi Arabia. The physical and chemical composition of the date fruits in different cultivars has been reported in many countries. The study aimed to assess the correlation between amylase activity & reducing sugar content in date fruits. It also aims to analyze the increase in amylase activity with the proportional increase in the reducing-sugar content. Methods: Qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between amylase activity & reducing sugar content in date fruits. Biochemical changes associated with the ripening of four different varieties of date fruits: sukkari, hilwa, sullaj, and khalas were examined. Results: The analysis showed that ripening of date fruits increased sugar content and enzyme activities. Correlation between amylase activity & reducing sugar content in date fruits was initially observed in Khalas and then in other varieties of date fruit. The ripening of all fruits was consistent in all date fruits varieties examined through the analysis exhibited considerable variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreading the Word About a Devastating Disease
    UPFRONT ALTERNATIVE SUGARS Spreading the Syrup word about a devastating disease November is Mouth Cancer Action Elaine Gardner, British Dietetic Association (BDA) Month and the Oral Health Foundation Spokesperson, discusses the sugar content in syrup and is asking dental professionals to show provides related oral health advice. their support and help save lives by raising vital awareness of mouth cancer. Mouth Cancer Action Month aims to reduce the amount of lives claimed by the disease and make a difference Name: Syrup All syrups contain a mixture of glucose, by promoting the importance of early fructose and sucrose in varying proportions, detection and prevention. The campaign What is it? A variety of different sugary with golden syrup and treacle containing hopes to get more mouth cancers liquids such as maple syrup, black treacle approximately a third sucrose. As a result, if diagnosed at an early stage by educating (molasses), golden syrup, date syrup and eaten in excess they have the same problems people on the risk factors, signs and pomegranate molasses can fall under this as sugar, ie obesity, diabetes. symptoms; while also encouraging the heading. These are produced as by-products Date syrup contains concentrated date sugar public to discuss them with their dental of the sugar industry (black treacle, golden (mainly fructose) with the pulp (fibre content) professional. syrup), from natural sources (maple syrup removed. It has been suggested that it has Like many cancers early detection is the sap of the maple tree) or made from antibacterial effects (similar to honey), but the makes such a vital difference to a fruits (dates, pomegranate juice).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study Between Mishrigi-Wdkhateeb Date Fruits As Semi-Wet Date Cultivar and Barakawi Date Fruits As Dry Cultivarwith Respect to Theirnutritional Value
    SUDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY College of Agricultural Studies Comparative Study Between Mishrigi-Wdkhateeb Date Fruits as Semi-wet Date Cultivar and Barakawi Date Fruits as Dry CultivarWith Respect to TheirNutritional Value دراﺳﺔ ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﯿﻦ ﻓﺎﻛﮭﺔ اﻟﺒﻠﺢ ﻣﺸﺮﻗﻲ دوﺧﻄﯿﺐ ﻛﺼﻨﻒ ﺷﺒﮫ رطﺐ وﻓﺎﻛﮭﺔ اﻟﺒﻠﺢ ﺑﺮﻛﺎوﯾﻜﺼﻨﻒ ﺟﺎف ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻘﯿﻤﺘﮭﻤﺎ اﻟﺘﻐﺬوﯾﺔ A dissertation Submitted to Sudan University of Science and Technology in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements of Master Science Degree in Food Science and Technology,Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Agricultural Studies By EIHAB HATEM JAD ELRAB ALTAHER Supervised By Prof. Dr. HATTIM MAKKI MOHAMED MAKKI July, 2017 CHAPTERONE CHAPTER TWO CHAPTER THREE CHAPTER FOUR CHAPTER FIVE REFERENCES APPENDICES ﺴﻢ اﻠﻪ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ اﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻗﺎل ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺛَﻤو َﻣ َﺮ َ ِﻦ ات ِ اﻟﻨﺨ ِﯿﻞِ وَاﻋْﻨَﺎب ِ ﺗَﺘِﺬُونَﻣِْﻪُ ﺳ َﻜَﺮاً وَرِزْﻗﺎً ﺣَﺴ َ ﻨﺎً ا ن ﻓِﻲ ذَِﻚَ ٓﯾَﺔً ﻟِّﻘَﻮْمٍ ﯾَﻌْﻘِﻠُﻮنَ ﴾ ﺻﺪق اﻟﻠﮫ اﻟﻌﻈﯿــــــــﻢ ﺳﻮرة اﻟﻨﺤﻞ اﻵﯾﺔ 67 I would like to dedicate this research work To my parents, My brothers: Mosa′ab, Mohamed and shehab and sister “Rehab” and my extended family With great regards & respects. Eihab ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all I would like to express my Prayers and thanks to my great ALMIGHTY ALLAH enabling me to complete my study. I am wishing to express deepest Grateful and sincere appreciations to my supervisor prof. Dr. Hattim Makkiwho was too patient with me during this stud. Also I would like to express my deepest gratitude to him for his systematic guidance, advice, patience, constructive criticisms and continuous supervision until the completion of the study. Thanks are also extended to my colleagues for their fruitful support and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Draft Rule – 5-953 Sweetened Beverage Tax I. GENERAL
    Draft Rule – 5-953 Sweetened Beverage Tax I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. This rule explains the Sweetened Beverage Tax (“SBT”) as imposed by Chapter 5.53 of the Seattle Municipal Code (“SMC”). The SBT is an excise tax on the distribution in the City of Seattle of any beverage, except as otherwise provided in Chapter 5.53 SMC and this rule, that is intended for human consumption and contains one or more caloric sweeteners. A. The provisions contained in Chapter 5.55 SMC shall have full force and application with respect to taxes imposed under Chapter 5.53 SMC. Definitions. The definitions contained in Chapter 5.30 shall be fully applicable to Chapter 5.53 except as may be expressly stated to the contrary herein. The following additional words and phrases when used in this Rule shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. 1. “Beverage for medical use” means a beverage suitable for human consumption and manufactured for uses as a/an: a. Oral nutritional therapy for persons who cannot absorb or metabolize caloric or dietary nutrients from usual food or beverages; or b. Oral rehydration electrolyte solution formulated to prevent or treat dehydration due to illness; or c. Any beverage that meets the statutory definition of “medical food” under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, 21 U.S.C. 360ee(b)(3), as amended. The Director may request documentation of “medical food” status and, upon request by the Director, the taxpayer is required to provide such information. The following are examples of beverages that are not “medical foods”: GATORADE POWERADE COCONUT WATER MUSCLE MILK SMARTWATER VITAMINWATER 1 Appendix A to this rule is a non-exclusive list of beverages for medical use, therapeutic nutritional meal replacements, and weight reduction meal replacements.
    [Show full text]