A History of Sugar Marketing Through 1974

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Sugar Marketing Through 1974 A HISTORY OF SUGAR MF.RKETING THROUGH 1974 14d :: ' t.,\; "''',.':- · ' ''t,: " '"' ,,.,· .........~.~, ~'"~ ,'~-''~~''', ' ' .. ~,~. ,..'... I;."', · , .;~.~'~, .'k'"" :O ,... ' :,'~.~..: I <' '". - . L~b~ I .. ' ', '.;., U..DEATEN FAGIUTUEECNMCS TTITC, N COEATVSSEVC AGR~~~~~ICUTRLEOOICRPR O 8 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMICS. STATISTICS, AND COOPERATIVES SERVICE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REPORT NO. 382 ABSTRACT The quota system of regulating the production, importation, and marketing of sugar in the United States through 1974 was an outgrowth of Government regulation of the sugar trade dating from colonial times. Similar systems have developed in most other countries, particu- larly those which import sugar. The U.S. Sugar Quota System benefited domestic sugar pro- ducers by providing stable prices at favorable levels. These prices also encouraged the produc- tion and use of substitute sweeteners, particularly high fructose and glucose sirup and crystalline dextrose in various industries. But sugar is still the most widely used sweetener in the United States, although its dominant position is being increasingly threatened. KEYWORDS: Sugar, quota, preference, tariff, refined, raw, sweeteners, corn sweeteners, world trade. PREFACE This report was written in 1975 by Roy A. Ballinger, formerly an agricultural economist in the Economic Research Service. It supersedes A History of Sugar Marketing, AER-197, also by Ballinger, issued in February 1971 and now out of print. On January 1, 1978, three USDA agencies-the Economic Research Service, the Statistical Reporting Service, and the Farmer Cooperative Service-merged into a new organization, the Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service. Washington, D.C. 20250 March 1978 CONTENTS Page Summary ........................................ ii Introduction ........................................................... 1 Sugar Before the Discovery of America ....................................... 1 The Colonial Period in the Americas ........................................ 2 Sugar from 1783 to 1864 ......... ........................................ 5 Developments in the Latter 19th Century ............................... .......... 8 Changes in U.S. Sugar Trade Following the Spanish-American War and During 1900-15 ......... ..................................... 15 Sugar During World War I ................................................ 20 Price Fluctuations and Higher Tariffs ....................................... 23 Sugar Quotas Prior to World War II .................................................... 32 Sugar During World War II ......... ...................................... 39 U.S. Sugar Quotas after 1947 ......... ................................... 52 Government Regulation of the Sugar Industry by Countries Other than the United States ........................................... 59 International Sugar Agreements After World War II ............................ 63 World Sugar Production and Trade ............................ ........................ 66 Postwar Trends in the U.S. Sugar Industry ................................... 74 Nonsugar Sweeteners: Recent Developments ................................. 82 Retrospect and Prospect ......................... ........................ 89 Bibliography .......................................................... 92 Appendix A .......................................................... 95 Appendix B . ...................... .................. ............... 97 SUMMARY It took about about 2,000 years for the production beet sugar in Europe, largely as a result of sugar of sugar, which originated in India, to move westward shortages during the Napoleonic wars. The new across much of Asia and North Africa and become source of sugar greatly reduced the market for cane established in islands controlled by Spain and Por- sugar and led to economic depression in many sugar- tugal in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Africa. But cane-producing areas throughout the world. establishing sugar production in these islands shortly The structure of the U.S. sugar industry was altered before the discovery of America facilitated the speedy greatly by events following the Spanish-American introduction of sugarcane to the New World. The War. Sugar from the Philippines and Puerto Rico was development of sugar production in the Western allowed duty-free entry into the United States, and Hemisphere, more than any other event, marked the beginning of present-day methods of sugar production tion from the rate applicable on sugar from other tion from the rate applicable on sugar from other and trade. Except for precious metals, sugar was the first commodity shipped in commercial quantities to Euro- Sugar shortages during World War I led to a large pean countries from colonies in the New World, thus, increase in output in countries exporting cane sugar, sugar colonies became valuable possessions of Euro- particularly Cuba. England shifted from a free trade pean countries controlling them. Since each country position in sugar to one of protection for its domestic attempted to control trade with its colonies to the industry and preference for its colonies. The United benefit of its European nationals and not the col- States doubled its import duty on sugar and, in 1934, onists, disputes became fairly common and much followed this with a quota system. An international smuggling developed. This was particularly notable sugar agreement was adopted in 1937, following a with respect to English colonies. Those on the main- series of earlier efforts to establish some international land of North America-where little or no sugar was control over the sugar trade. The U.S. quota system produced-were anxious to trade surplus products for ended in December 1974. sugar and molasses produced in the Caribbean in In most years until the end of 1974, this protection Spanish and French as well as English colonies. Tar- led to somewhat higher sugar prices in the United iffs and other trade restrictions established by States and most other sugar-importing nations. It had England were greatly resented in the mainland col- also encouraged the production of nonsugar sweet- onies and were a factor leading to the Revolutionary eners and of attempts to produce sugar from sources War. other than sugarcane and sugarbeets. The most Ironically, one of the first acts of the U.S. Con- important of these competitors until about 1974 were gress, after the adoption of the Constitution, was to the starch sweeteners, commonly known in this coun- place an import duty on sugar as a means of raising try as corn glucose sirup and dextrose. The noncaloric revenue for the Government. Following the Louisiana sweeteners-saccharin and, for a few years, Purchase, the tariff also had the effect of protecting cyclamate-also increased in importance, however, the newly established sugar industry in southern Lou- current and proposed restrictions are expected to isiana. During the 40 years or so before the Civil War, restrict their use. And recently methods have been Louisiana supplied a substantial part of the relatively developed for producing fructose from starch in the small quantity of sugar consumed in the United form of a sirup containing enough fructose to make a States. product considerably sweeter than ordinary corn sirup. The most important new feature of the sugar These methods appear to be of great potential eco- industry in the 19th century was the development of nomic importance. ii A HISTORY OF SUGAR MARKETING THROUGH 1974 by Roy A. Ballinger INTRODUCTION Cane sugar has been an important article of food in sweeteners interest producers, importers, and con- the world for several thousand years. It has been an sumers of sugar. Sugar and other sweeteners have important commodity in international trade since come to be regarded as necessary by consumers in shortly after the discovery of America. And since the nearly all countries, increasing the need for abundant early 19th century, both cane and beet sugar have and reliable supplies. contributed importantly to the economic development of most nations of the world, including the United This report traces developments in the marketing States. of sugar and other sweeteners in the United States Since colonial times, a large share of U.S. sugar and, to some degree, in other countries. It is particu- needs has been supplied by imports from various larly concerned with countries from which the United countries. In addition, this country has produced a States has obtained large supplies. The influence of large amount of cane and beet sugar for domestic Government policies toward sugar in the United consumption. Production of nonsugar sweeteners has States and other countries is described. Also, trade in also achieved considerable economic importance. As sugar among nations is examined, since this trade a consequence, domestic and international problems has had a considerable indirect effect on sugar trade connected with the marketing of sugar and other patterns and production in the United States. SUGAR BEFORE THE DISCOVERY OF AMERICA Early Sweeteners Hemisphere when Europeans first arrived and explored the area. Although the natives in America The oldest sweet substance known to be used, obtained their honey from species of bees not present except fruits and other plant materials containing sug- in Europe and Asia, early European settlers brought ar, is honey. The principal ingredient of honey is a honey bees from Europe which have since become
Recommended publications
  • Assessing Transportation Problems of the Sugar Cane Industry in Thailand
    Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific No.70, 2001 ASSESSING THE TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS OF THE SUGAR CANE INDUSTRY IN THAILAND Paitoon Chetthamrongchai,* Aroon Auansakul** and Decha Supawan*** ABSTRACT Transportation has a fundamental role in the economic development of all countries. It is not just a means to service commuting people, but also to collect products and materials from producers and distribute them to consumers. Transportation has become a significant factor affecting the production costs of commodities. The production of sugar cane in Thailand is no exception. The cost of transporting sugar cane from the farm gate to the mills is quite high, owing to the multiple transport facilities and time-consuming activities involved in the delivery process. The total transportation expenditure was estimated at 5,708 million baht for the crop year 1999- 2000. The average cost per transaction incurred by farmers (excluding other labour costs) was in the range of 180-220 baht per ton in 1999. A large portion of this cost comprises truck rental and driver wages. These two elements together represent a high proportion of the overall production cost. The transportation issue has been overlooked in many industrial sectors and in the agricultural sector, in particular. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a study on the transportation and other relevant costs of sugar cane production. The findings and the subsequent recommendations could be considered for the enhancement of welfare of the sugar cane farmers and the increased efficiency of the industry in general and may also be applied to other agro- based industries facing similar problems.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic History of the United States Sugar Program
    AN ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES SUGAR PROGRAM by Tyler James Wiltgen A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Applied Economics MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana August 2007 © COPYRIGHT by Tyler James Wiltgen 2007 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Tyler James Wiltgen This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Chair Vincent H. Smith Approved for the Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Myles J. Watts Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copy is allowed for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Tyler James Wiltgen August 2007 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am greatly indebted to Dr. Vincent Smith, my thesis committee chairman, for his guidance throughout the development of this thesis; I appreciate all of his help and support. In addition, I would like to thank the other members of the committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Protein in Icing
    Corn Protein in Icing Protein ingredients can be added to confectionery products to aid in water and fat retention. Another benefit is protein fortification. An experiment was run to evaluate the impact of adding corn protein to an icing formula. The experiment compared a control and test sample. Corn protein was produced by Cargill with at least 85 wt% corn protein (dry basis) and less than about 1.5 wt% oil (dry basis), as described in patent application WO20161544CPI. The formula could be adapted to use corn protein with a minimum of 65 wt% protein and less than 3 wt% oil (dry basis) and anticipate the same finding. An example involves white icings. Icings with and without the addition of corn protein were prepared using the formula and process procedures listed. Corn protein replaced powdered sugar in this example. FORMULA Ingredients Control (%) Test (%) Powdered Sugar 57.8 52.8 Corn Protein 0.0 5 Water 18.2 18.2 Granulated Sugar 11.3 11.3 GelogenTM 5.8 5.8 Corn Syrup Solids 4.6 4.6 Hard Fat Flakes 2.3 2.3 Total 100.00 100.00 PROCESSING PROCEDURE 1. Add water, granulated sugar, corn syrup solids and Gelogen to the Vorwerk pitcher 2. Heat the mixture to 100°C and hold for a minimum of 3 minutes with the hole in the center covered 3. Turn off heating (set to 50°C) 4. Add the fat and allow it to melt (approx. 30 seconds – 1 minute) 5. Increase the mixing spread and add the powdered sugar 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar & Sweeteners Outlook
    Economic Research Service Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook Situation and Outlook Michael McConnell, coordinator [email protected] SSS-M-322 Stephanie Riche, contributor June 16, 2015 [email protected] Improved Production Prospects for 2015/16 Reduce the Demand for Imports The next release is July 16, 2015 -------------- The USDA increased projections of 2014/15 sugar production by 33,000 short tons, raw Approved by the value (STRV) to 8.560 million based on the improved outlook for early beet harvest for the World Agricultural 2015/16 crop. Projected imports are increased 58,000 STRV based on a reallocation of the Outlook Board. raw sugar TRQ by the U.S. Trade Representative, reducing expected shortfall. Total use for 2014/15 is reduced 109,000 STRV based on pace-to-date food deliveries reported through April—particularly due to lower direct consumption imports since the beginning of the fiscal year. The projected stocks-to-use ratio is currently 15.0 percent, up from 13.2 percent the previous month. The improved outlook for the 2015/16 sugarbeet crop also resulted in a 270,000 STRV increase in projected 2015/16 sugar production. Projected food deliveries for 2015/16 are reduced 110,000 STRV to reflect the reduction in the current year’s outlook. Projected imports from Mexico in 2015/16 are reduced by 595,000 STRV, as the reductions in other supplies and total use reduces the calculation of U.S. Needs, as defined in the agreement to suspend the countervailing duty investigation signed between the U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) and the Government of Mexico in December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Act, 2020
    TI{E R:EPT'BI,IC OF UGAI{DA THE suGARAcr, 2020', PARLIAMENT LIBRARY I PO 8OX 7178, XAMPALA \ * 28APR?f;;3 * CALL NO TTIE REPUBLXC Otr UGAIIDA PARLIAMENT LIBRARY PO BOX 7178. KAMPALA * 7 8. APR ;i:I * CALL I sIcNIry my assent to the bill. t President Date of assent 3r^J Act Sugar Act 2020 TTM SUGAR ACT,2O2O. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Penr I-PnsLrMrNARY 1. Commencement 2. Interpretation Panr II-UcnNoe Sucen Bonno 3. Establishment of the Uganda Sugar Board 4. Composition of the Board 5. Tenure of office of members of the Board 6. Remuneration of members of the Board PARLIAMENT LIBRARY PO BOX 7178. XAMPALA Functions of the Board * 2 t f":l l*"' * 7 . Functions of the Board ACC NO: 8. Cooperation with other agencies CALL NO:... 9. Powers of the Board 10. Powers of Minister 11. Meetings of the Board and related matters 12. Committees of the Board 13. Delegation of functions of the Board Penr Itr-STAFF oF rHp Boano t4 Executive director. 15 Functions of the executive director 16 Staff of the Board Penr IV-FTNANCES 17. Funds of the Board 18. Duty to operate in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act and sound financial principles Act Sugar Act 2020 Section Pexr V-LrcENsrNc on MrI-s 19. Licensing of mills 20. Application for a licence to operate mill 21. Processing, grant or refusal of licence 22. Modification of mill or plant Pnnr VI-Sucm INousrRY AcREEMENTS 23. Sugar industry agreements Penr VII-Sucnn CeNs PRlctNc 24. Sugar cane pricing Panr VIII-NATIoNAL Sucen Rrsrancs INsrtrure 25.
    [Show full text]
  • POWDERED SUGAR Food Additive, Flavor
    GHS SAFETY DATA SHEET AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY Prepared to U.S. OSHA Standards in compliance with the GHS system (29 CFR 1910.1200(g), rev. 2012 Section Identification 1 POWDERED SUGAR food additive, flavor enhancer, baking Manufacturer's Name ingredient, intended for American Crystal Sugar Co. human consumption 101 North 3rd Street Moorhead, MN 56560 No restrictions on use Emergency Telephone Number: (218) 236-4400 Preparation Date: Telephone Number for Information 21 November 2014 (218) 236-4324 Revised: New Section Hazard(s) No Hazardous Components The dust generated by 2 Identification the transportation and Sugar and starch support combustion handling of sugar is an only poorly and are not by themselves explosion hazard; hazards unless they are involved as measures must be taken secondary fuels in an existing fire. to avoid the creation of fugitive dust and to abate any dust created. Section Composition / Sucrose, sugar, saccharose; Table sugar, beet sugar, 3 Information on C12 H22 O11 : 97% natural sweetener Ingredients IUPAC: (2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-2-[(2S,3S,4S,5R)- CAS 57-50-1 3,4-dihydroxy-2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl) UNII C151H8M554 oxolan-2-yl]oxy-6-(hydroxymethyl) EINECS 200-334-9 oxane-3,4,5-triol ] RTECS WN6500000 Corn starch: 3% CAS 9005-25-8 RTECS C151H8M554 EINECS 232-679-6 Section First Aid Measures INHALED: not expected to require first EYES: Possible mechanical 4 aid. Exposure to dust may aggravate pre- irritant. Flush granular existing respiratory conditions. Remove material with running to fresh air; get medical attention for any water, holding eyelids open. breathing difficulty.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Works Cited PRIMARY Articles Aubrey, Allison. “Sweet Tooth Gone Bad: Why 22 Teaspoons of Sugar per Day is Risky.” Npr.com. NPR: ​ ​ Wisconsin Public Radio, 4 Feb 2014. Web. This source is an NPR article on the health risks of sugar. It details how much sugar Americans eat and how easy it is for people to consume more than the recommended amount of sugar by eating processed foods. It contains a helpful image that highlights the large amounts of sugar in typical products. It is a primary source because it describes modern sugar consumption and it discusses studies conducted recently. Books Austin, Harry A. History and Development of the Beet Sugar Industry. Washington, D.C.: 1180 National ​ ​ Press Building, 1928. Digital Collections of Colorado, University of Colorado. Web. 4 April 2016. ​ ​ This source is a book on the beet sugar industry written by Harry A. Austin, the Secretary of the U.S Sugar Beet Association. I used this source to understand the sugar beet industry and the role of sugar in the early 20th century. While this source had some scientific inaccuracies due to a lack of understanding of organic chemistry and had little information on sugar in Asia, I used the descriptions of beet sugar in the 1920’s in my documentary. This source describes how integral sugar had become to American and European households by the 1920’s and how beet sugar was used. While I primarily used this source as a primary source to gain insight into sugar in the early 20th century, I read some secondary material from this source on sugar beets in the 1800’s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alcoholic Republic
    THE ALCOHOLIC REPUBLIC AN AMERICAN TRADITION w. J. RORABAUGH - . - New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1979 THE GROG-SHOP o come le t us all to the grog- shop: The tempest is gatheri ng fa st- The re sure lyis nought li ke the grog- shop To shield fr om the turbulent blast. For there will be wrangli ng Wi lly Disputing about a lame ox; And there will be bullyi ng Billy Challengi ng negroes to box: Toby Fillpot with carbuncle nose Mixi ng politics up with his li quor; Ti m Tuneful that si ngs even prose, And hiccups and coughs in hi s beaker. Dick Drowsy with emerald eyes, Kit Crusty with hair like a comet, Sam Smootly that whilom grewwise But returned like a dog to his vomit And the re will be tippli ng and talk And fuddling and fu n to the lif e, And swaggering, swearing, and smoke, And shuffling and sc uffling and strife. And there will be swappi ng ofhorses, And betting, and beating, and blows, And laughter, and lewdness, and losses, And winning, and wounding and woes. o the n le t us offto the grog- shop; Come, fa ther, come, jonathan, come; Far drearier fa r than a Sunday Is a storm in the dull ness ofhome . GREEN'S ANTI-INTEMPERANCE ALMANACK (1831) PREFACE THIS PROJECT began when I discovered a sizeable collec­ tion of early nineteenth-century temperance pamphlets. As I read those tracts, I wondered what had prompted so many authors to expend so much effort and expense to attack alcohol.
    [Show full text]
  • Delicioussm GOLDEN BROWN SUGAR Product Information Sheet
    9501 Southview Ave. Brookfield, Illinois 60513 www.sweetenersupply.com www.powderedcellulose.com DELICIOUSsm GOLDEN BROWN SUGAR Product Information Sheet Product Code BR0050 A brown sugar produced by enrobing cane granulated sugar with high quality cane juice molasses. Delicious Golden brown is perfect for baked goods, barbecue sauces, or any formulation where a quality brown sugar is desired. Label Declaration: Brown Sugar (Sugar, Molasses) ANALYSIS Dry Solids 98% min Moisture 2% max Ash 2% max. Color Golden Brown Odor Typical of Brown Sugar Sucrose 90% typical Invert 4% typical NUTRITIONAL ANALYSIS Per 100 g Calories 390 Moisture 2g Carbohydrate 97.6 Sugars 97.6 Ash 0.40 Sodium 17 mg Potassium 96 mg Magnesium 9 mg Calcium 25 mg Not a dietary significant source of protein, fat, vitamins or fiber. MICROBIOLOGY Aerobic Plate Count – Max 500 cfu/g Yeast & Mold – Max 100 cfu/g Pathogen free Phone (708) 588-8400 Fax (708) 588-8460 Revision 3 3/21/16 approved VP Food Tech 9501 Southview Ave. Brookfield, Illinois 60513 www.sweetenersupply.com www.powderedcellulose.com Allergen Statement Brown Sugar Allergen Source: Present in Used on same Comments: Product production line Dairy: No No Egg/Egg Derivative: No No Soy/Soy Derivative: No No Peanut: No No Wheat/Wheat No No Derivative: Fish (Cod, tuna, No No etc): Nuts (tree nuts, No No etc): Crustaceans (shell No No fish, lobster, etc.): Mollusks (snail, No No clams, etc.): Seeds (sesame, No No celery, etc.): Gluten: No No Colors (FD&C, No No Caramel color): MSG: No No Sorbates: No No Sulfites: No No Benzoates: No No BHA/BHT: No No Artificial No No Sweeteners: Animal derivatives: No No Mustard No No Phone (708) 588-8400 Fax (708) 588-8460 Revision 3 3/21/16 approved VP Food Tech 9501 Southview Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Maple Sugar Blondies
    S H E L B U R N E F A R M S Maple Sugar Blondies Adapted from Cooking with Shelburne Farms by Melissa Pasanen with Rick Gencarelli INGREDIENTS For the dough 2¼ cups all-purpose flour 1 teaspoon baking soda ½ teaspoon salt ¾ cup canola oil ¼ cup Vermont maple syrup (use Grade A: Dark Color with Robust Taste or Grade A: Very Dark Color with Strong Taste for a stronger maple flavor) ¾ cup granulated maple sugar (or packed light brown sugar) 1 large egg beaten For the frosting ¼ cup Vermont maple syrup (see note above) ½ cup granulated maple sugar ½ cup confectioner’s sugar 6 tablespoons cold, unsalted butter cut into small pieces ½ teaspoon pure vanilla extract PREPARATION 1. Preheat the oven to 350°F. Lightly grease a 9x13-inch baking pan. In a medium bowl, whisk together the flour, baking soda, and salt. 2. In a separate bowl, beat together the canola oil, maple syrup, maple sugar, and white sugar until well blended. (If you have one, use a stand mixer fitted with a paddle attachment on medium speed.) Add the egg in a slow stream. Mix in the flour mixture in thirds, blending after each addition. (Use low speed in stand mixer.) 3. Press dough evenly into prepared pan. Bake 20-25 minutes until the blondies are golden brown and starting to crack on the top like brownies. Remove the pan to a cooling rack and cool for about 30 minutes before frosting. It should be warm to the touch, not hot. 4. The frosting: While the blondies are baking, bring the maple syrup to a simmer in a medium, heavy-bottomed saucepan over medium-high heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing Table Sugar with Maple Sugar by STEPHEN CHILDS
    Cornell Maple Bulletin 205 (2007) Replacing Table Sugar with Maple Sugar by STEPHEN CHILDS Balancing Balancing ingredients Ingredients Replacing granulated cane or beet sugar in recipes with maple syrup should be a growing trend. Guidelines about sugar replacement are different in different sources. It is easy to understand this confusing situation when you realize there are actually two ingredients that need to be balanced. When replacing granulated sugar in a recipe with maple syrup you should consider both the sugar balance and the liquid balance of the recipe. Some recommendations say to add 1 ! cup of syrup to replace one cup of sugar, others say to replace one cup of sugar with " cup of maple syrup. One is trying to balance the liquid in the recipe, the other the sweetness. The most straightforward approach is to simply replace one cup of granulated cane sugar with one cup of granulated maple sugar. In this case you gain the extra flavors from maple while the sweetness and the liquid stay in balance. I would especially suggest this where the recipe is depending on the qualities of milk or another liquid that you may be reducing to perform some important function in the recipe beyond what simply using water would accomplish. Liquid vs. Dry Liquid vs. Dry One cup of maple syrup at a fairly common density of 67º Brix provides 7.5 ounces (214 grams) of sugar and 3.7 ounces (105 grams) of water. One cup of cane sugar averages about 7.4 ounces (210 grams) of sugar. This is roughly the same amount sugar in a cup of maple syrup as in a cup of granulated sugar.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Volatiles in Commercial and Self-Prepared Rum Ethers and Comparison with Key Aroma Compounds of Rum
    CHARACTERIZATION OF VOLATILES IN COMMERCIAL AND SELF-PREPARED RUM ETHERS AND COMPARISON WITH KEY AROMA COMPOUNDS OF RUM BY ERIN E. BURNSIDE THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Food Science and Human Nutrition with a concentration in Food Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Professor Keith Cadwallader Professor Nicki Engeseth Assistant Professor Youngsoo Lee Abstract Rum ether is a distillate of wood extractives, so named as a result of its purported similarity in flavor to rum; however, despite it being used widely throughout the flavor industry, no work is publicly available that delves into the aroma characteristics of rum ether or explores how they compare to those of rum. With these goals in mind, two popular rums were subjected to aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) in order to establish the aroma profile for typical gold or white rum. Both commercial and self-prepared samples of rum ether were then subjected to aroma analysis for comparison with these results. Ten commercial samples obtained from a number of flavor companies were analyzed by direct injection gas chromatography-olfactometry (GCO) in order to establish an understanding of traits common to most or all commercial rum ethers. These served as a guide when using scaled-down industrial methods for distillation of two rum ethers. In both, the feasibility was assessed of replacing pyroligneous acid, a traditional rum ether ingredient, with liquid smoke, one that is more widely available and safer for use in food.
    [Show full text]