DOCSLIB.ORG

Falso Gusano De La Fruta (Thaumatotibia Leucotreta) Meyrick, 1913

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Falso Gusano De La Fruta (Thaumatotibia Leucotreta) Meyrick, 1913 FALSO GUSANO DE LA FRUTA Thaumatotibia leucotreta Meyrick, 1913 Ficha Técnica No. 70 Gilligan y Epstein, 2014; Boersma, 2017; Van der Straten, s/a; Hofmeyr, s/a; Kenneth, s/a. CONTENIDO IDENTIDAD ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Nombre científico .............................................................................................................................. 1 Sinonimia .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Clasificación taxonómica ................................................................................................................... 1 Nombre común.................................................................................................................................. 1 Código EPPO .................................................................................................................................... 1 Guía para su identificación ................................................................................................................ 1 Estatus fitosanitario ........................................................................................................................... 1 Situación de la plaga en México........................................................................................................ 1 IMPORTANCIA ECONÓMICA DE LA PLAGA ...................................................................................... 1 Impacto económico a nivel mundial ................................................................................................ 2 Potencial de impacto económico en México ..................................................................................... 2 DISTRIBUCIÓN GEOGRÁFICA DE LA PLAGA ................................................................................... 3 HOSPEDANTES ................................................................................................................................... 5 Distribución nacional de hospedantes ............................................................................................... 6 ASPECTOS BIOLÓGICOS Y ECOLÓGICOS ....................................................................................... 7 Ciclo biológico ................................................................................................................................... 7 Descripción morfológica .................................................................................................................. 11 Huevo .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Larva ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Pupa ............................................................................................................................................ 13 Adulto .......................................................................................................................................... 13 DAÑOS Y SÍNTOMAS ........................................................................................................................ 17 Similitud con otras especies ............................................................................................................ 20 ASPECTOS EPIDEMIOLÓGICOS ..................................................................................................... 21 Dispersión ....................................................................................................................................... 21 MEDIDAS FITOSANITARIAS ............................................................................................................. 21 Muestreo o monitoreo de la plaga ................................................................................................... 21 Control cultural ................................................................................................................................ 21 Control biológico ............................................................................................................................. 21 Control químico ............................................................................................................................... 22 Control etológico ............................................................................................................................. 22 Técnica del insecto estéril ............................................................................................................... 22 Medidas regulatorias ....................................................................................................................... 23 VIGILANCIA EPIDEMIOLÓGICA FITOSANITARIA ............................................................................ 23 Toma y envío de muestras .............................................................................................................. 23 Alerta fitosanitaria ........................................................................................................................... 23 BIBLIOGRAFÍA ................................................................................................................................... 23 Área: Vigilancia Epidemiológica Fitosanitaria CÓDIGO EPPO: ARGPLE. Comentarios y sugerencias enviar correo a: [email protected] IDENTIDAD Código EPPO Nombre científico ARGPLE. Thaumatotibia leucotreta Meyrick. Guía para su identificación Para su identificación se recomienda consultar las publicaciones de Couilloud (1988), Williams (1953) y Komai (1999); en las que se describe a detalle la especie T. leucotreta. Estatus fitosanitario De acuerdo con la Norma Internacional para Medidas Fitosanitarias (NIMF) No. 5, Glosario de (Gilligan y Epstein, 2014) términos fitosanitarios, Thaumatotibia leucotreta Sinonimia cumple con la definición de plaga cuarentenaria y puede potencialmente causar pérdidas Cryptophlebia leucotreta Meyrick económicas en cultivos hospedantes (IPPC, Cryptophlebia roerigii Zacher 2018). Olethreutes leucotreta Meyrick Thaumatotibia roerigii Zacher Situación de la plaga en México Clasificación taxonómica Con base en la NIMF No. 8, Determinación de la situación de una plaga en un área, Clase: Insecta Thaumatotibia leucotreta es una plaga Ausente Orden: Lepidoptera en México: no hay registros de la plaga (IPPC, Familia: Tortricidae 2017). Género: Thaumatotibia Especie: Thaumatotibia leucotreta IMPORTANCIA ECONÓMICA DE LA PLAGA Nombre común Thaumatotibia leucotreta es una de las plagas más destructivas de cítricos en África (Gilligan et al., 2011; Newton, 1998). Las larvas se alimentan Nombre común directamente de los frutos ocasionando madurez Palomilla de la naranja, Falso prematura y caída del fruto. Las lesiones Español gusano de la fruta. originadas durante su alimentación sirven de entrada para patógenos oportunistas que False codling moth, citrus incrementan el daño (Gilligan et al., 2011). Las Inglés codling moth, orange codling larvas de T. leucotreta son polífagas y han sido moth, orange moth. reportadas en más de 50 especies de plantas, que incluyen a más de 30 familias botánicas (Brown et Fausse carpocapse, teigne de l´ Francés al., 2014). En África, no solo es una plaga oranger. importante en cítricos, también origina pérdidas Fuente: CAB International, 2018. económicas en cultivos como aguacate, algodón maíz, guayaba, macadamia, mango, durazno, y Área: Vigilancia Epidemiológica Fitosanitaria CÓDIGO EPPO: ARGPLE. Comentarios y sugerencias enviar correo a: [email protected] 1 otros de interés agrícola y hortícola (Venette et al., 2003; Guilligan et al., 2011; CAB International, Potencial de impacto económico en México 2018). En México, T. leucotreta representa una seria Esta palomilla es considerada una plaga amenaza, principalmente para los cultivos de cuarentenaria de importancia internacional, maíz, aguacate, cítricos, café, plátano, cacao, principalmente para países exportadores de mango, durazno, los cuales son los de mayor cítricos, incluido los Estados Unidos. Por lo ingreso y superficie sembrada en el país. De anterior, la detección de una sola larva en frutos introducirse a México, tendría repercusiones de exportación, puede resultar en el rechazo de económicas inmediatas en estos y otros cultivos, todo el envío (Venette et al., 2003; Boersma y los cuales tuvieron en conjunto un valor de Carpenter, 2016; Onah et al., 2016). producción de alrededor de 226,514 millones de pesos, con una producción de 62,669,610.27 Por la importancia que esta plaga reviste, el toneladas obtenidas en una superficie sembrada panel de expertos sobre medidas fitosanitarias de de 11,850,656.29 ha (Cuadro 1) [SIAP, 2018; con la Organización Europea y Mediterránea de datos del ciclo agrícola 2017]. De acuerdo con lo Protección Vegetal (EPPO por sus siglas en que se reporta en la literatura, T. leucotreta es ingles), decidió agregarla a la lista de alertas de la más severa en cítricos (Grové et al., 2012). En EPPO, como una plaga A2 (EPPO, 2018a). este sentido, actualmente México ocupa el quinto lugar en producción de cítricos a nivel mundial, Impacto económico a nivel mundial por lo tanto, el ingreso, establecimiento y dispersión de esta
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir
    Importation of Fresh Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Shelled or in Pods, from Jordan into the Continental United States A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment February 14, 2011 Version 2 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Beans from Jordan Executive Summary In this risk assessment we examined the risks associated with the importation of fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in pods (French, green, snap, and string beans) or shelled, from the Kingdom of Jordan into the continental United States. We developed a list of pests associated with beans (in any country) that occur in Jordan on any host based on scientific literature, previous commodity risk assessments, records of intercepted pests at ports-of-entry, and information from experts on bean production. This is a qualitative risk assessment, as we express estimates of risk in descriptive terms (High, Medium, and Low) rather than numerically in probabilities or frequencies. We identified seven quarantine pests likely to follow the pathway of introduction. We estimated Consequences of Introduction by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate-host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact. We estimated Likelihood of Introduction values by considering both the quantity of the commodity imported annually and the potential for pest introduction and establishment. We summed the Consequences of Introduction and Likelihood of Introduction values to estimate overall Pest Risk Potentials, which describe risk in the absence of mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia Leucotreta
    Stone Fruit Commodity-Based Pest Survey False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta Introduction False codling moth (Figure 1) is a significant pest because of its potential economic impact on many crops, including stone fruit, avocado, citrus, corn, cotton, and macadamia. It is not currently known to be present in the United States. Biology Depending on conditions, the false codling moth’s life cycle ranges from 30 to 174 days. It can produce from 2 to 10 generations each year, depending on multiple factors including temperature, food availability and quality, and humidity. To attract males, adult females release pheromones at FIGURE 1. Adult false codling moth (Thaumatotibia leucotreta). Photo courtesy of night. After the adults mate, the female deposits eggs on Pest and Diseases Image Library, Bugwood.org. host plants, either in batches or as single eggs. Later, the hatching larvae burrow into the rind of the host plant. Mature larvae spin cocoons and pupate before they emerge as adults. Symptoms False codling moth can attack stone fruit at any stage. Larvae can even develop in hard green fruit prior to application of control measures. Larvae burrow at the stem end into the fruit and cause damage by feeding around the stone. Damaged fruit can become vulnerable to secondary pests such as fungal organisms and scavengers. Peaches can be damaged by larvae beginning up to 6 weeks before harvest. False codling moth can also attack plants unsuitable for larvae development, such as avocado, causing lesions on fruit tissue and diminishing the marketability of fruit. Because false codling moth is an internal feeder, few symptoms are actually displayed by the larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Poole Harbour Species List
    Moths of Poole Harbour is a project of Birds of Poole Harbour Moths of Poole Harbour Species List Birds of Poole Harbour & Moths of Poole Harbour recording area The Moths of Poole Harbour Project The ‘Moths of Poole Harbour’ project (MoPH) was established in 2017 to gain knowledge of moth species occurring in Poole Harbour, Dorset, their distribution, abundance and to some extent, their habitat requirements. The study area uses the same boundaries as the Birds of Poole Harbour (BoPH) project. Abigail Gibbs and Chris Thain, previous Wardens on Brownsea Island for Dorset Wildlife Trust (DWT), were invited by BoPH to undertake a study of moths in the Poole Harbour recording area. This is an area of some 175 square kilometres stretching from Corfe Castle in the south to Canford Heath in the north of the conurbation and west as far as Wareham. 4 moth traps were purchased for the project; 3 Mercury Vapour (MV) Robinson traps with 50m extension cables and one Actinic, Ultra-violet (UV) portable Heath trap running from a rechargeable battery. This was the capability that was deployed on most of the ensuing 327 nights of trapping. Locations were selected using a number of criteria: Habitat, accessibility, existing knowledge (previously well-recorded sites were generally not included), potential for repeat visits, site security and potential for public engagement. Field work commenced from late July 2017 and continued until October. Generally, in the years 2018 – 2020 trapping field work began in March/ April and ran on until late October or early November, stopping at the first frost.
    [Show full text]
  • Thaumatotibia Leucotreta
    Thaumatotibia leucotreta Scientific Name Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) Synonyms: Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyrick), Cryptophlebia roerigii Zacher Olethreutes leucotreta Meyrick Thaumatotibia roerigii Zacher Common Name(s) False codling moth, citrus codling moth, orange moth, and orange codling moth Type of Pest Moth Figure 1. Larva of Thaumatotibia leucotreta (T. Grove Taxonomic Position and W. Styn, bugwood.org). Class: Insecta, Order: Lepidoptera, Family: Tortricidae Reason for Inclusion CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List - 2003 through 2014 Pest Description Eggs: Eggs are flat, oval (0.77 mm long by 0.60 mm wide) shaped discs with a granulated surface. The eggs are white to cream colored when initially laid. They change to a reddish color before the black head capsule of the larvae becomes visible under the chorion prior to hatching (Daiber, 1979a). 1 Larvae: First instar (neonate) larvae approximately 1 to 1.2 mm (< /16 in) in length with dark pinacula giving a spotted appearance, fifth instar larvae are orangey-pink, 1 becoming more pale on sides and yellow in ventral region, 12 to 18 mm (approx. /2 to 11 /16 in) long, with a brown head capsule and prothoracic shield (Fig. 1). [Note this coloration is only present in live specimens.] The last abdominal segment bears an anal comb with two to ten “teeth.” The mean head capsule width for the first through fifth instar larvae has been recorded as: 0.22, 0.37, 0.61, 0.94 and 1.37 mm, respectively (Daiber, 1979b). Diagnostic characters would include the anal comb with two to ten teeth in addition to: L pinaculum on T1 enlarged and extending beneath and beyond (posterad of) the spiracle; spiracle on A8 displaced posterad of SD pinaculum; crochets unevenly triordinal, 36-42; L-group on A9 usually trisetose (all setae usually on same pinaulum) (Brown, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • New Pest Response Guidelines False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia Leucotreta
    United States Department of New Pest Response Agriculture Marketing and Regulatory Guidelines Programs Animal and False Codling Moth Plant Health Inspection Service Thaumatotibia leucotreta Cooperating State Departments of Agriculture August 13, 2007 New Pest Response Guidelines False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta August 13, 2007 New Pest Response Guidelines: False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta was prepared by Jeffrey Stibick, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Emergency and Domestic Programs and edited by Patricia S. Michalak, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Manuals Unit. Cite this report as follows: Stibick, J. 2006. New Pest Response Guidelines: False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta. USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Emergency and Domestic Programs, Riverdale, Maryland [http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ import_export/plants/ppq_manuals.shtml]. R. L. Dunkle May 3, 2007 Richard Dunkle, Deputy Administrator Date USDA–APHIS–PPQ Emergency and Domestic Programs Emergency Planning Joel Floyd, Team Leader 4700 River Road Unit 137 Riverdale, Maryland 20737 Telephone: 310/734-4396 [email protected] 1 Credits False Codling Moth Contributors Stephanie Bloem, U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)–Center for Plant Health Science and Technology (CPHST), Raleigh, North Carolina Jim E. Carpenter, USDA–Agricultural Research Service (ARS)–Crop Protection and Management Research, Tifton, Georgia Susan Ellis, USDA–APHIS–Plant Protection and Quarantine–Office of the Deputy Administrator, Riverdale, Maryland Todd Gilligan, Ohio State University, Museum of Biodiversity, Columbus, Ohio Jeffrey N. L. Stibick, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Emergency and Domestic Programs, Riverdale, Maryland Shaharra J. Usnick, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Plant Health Programs, Riverdale, Maryland Robert C. Venette, USDA–Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota Industry, State Regulatory Officers, Universities, and Governmental Agencies as credited in: September 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Thaumatotibia Leucotreta (Meyrick)
    Keys About Fact Sheets Glossary Larval Morphology References << Previous fact sheet Next fact sheet >> TORTRICIDAE - Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) Taxonomy Click here to download this Fact Sheet as a printable PDF Tortricoidea: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae: Grapholitini: Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) Common names: false codling moth Synonyms: Thaumatotibia roerigii The false codling moth is incorrectly referred to as Cryptophlebia leucotreta in many publications (Brown 2006). Fig. 1: Late instar, lateral view Larval diagnosis (Summary) L pinaculum on T1 enlarged and extending beneath and beyond (posterad of) the spiracle Anal comb present with 2-10 teeth D1 and SD1 on the same pinaculum on A9 Fig. 2: Early instar, lateral view Spiracle on A8 displaced posterad of SD pinaculum Crochets unevenly triordinal, 36-42 L group on A9 usually trisetose (all setae usually on same pinaulum) Host/origin information Nearly half of all T. leucotreta interceptions come from South Africa on Citrus. This species is also one of the most commonly intercepted tortricids on pepper (Capsicum annuum) and eggplant (Solanum melongena). Other common origin/host combinations are listed below: Fig. 3: L group on T1 Fig. 4: Anal comb Origin Host(s) [Africa] Capsicum annuum, Solanum melongena, Citrus Cape Verde Ziziphus Ghana Capsicum Nigeria Capsicum South Africa Citrus Recorded distribution Fig. 5: A9, anal shield Fig. 6: A8 spiracle Thaumatotibia leucotreta is widely distributed across Africa and has been reported from approximately 40 countries on the African continent. It is occasionally reported from Europe and is considered locally present in Israel (EPPO 2013). Identifcation authority (Summary) Positive identifications of T. leucotreta should be restricted to larvae intercepted from Africa (or Europe, and especially the Netherlands, if transshipment is suspected) with the L pinaculum on T1 enlarged and extending beneath and beyond (posterad of) the spiracle and an anal comb present.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Delineation of Types of Tortricidae, 1. Types of Oriental
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Razowski, J.; Wojtusiak, J. Delineation of Types of Tortricidae, 1. Types of Oriental species in the Munich Museum described by A. Diakonoff (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 37, núm. 146, junio, 2009, pp. 191-208 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45512170009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 191-208 Delineation of Types of 31/5/09 15:07 Página 191 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 37 (146), junio 2009: 191-208 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 Delineation of Types of Tortricidae, 1. Types of Oriental species in the Munich Museum described by A. Diakonoff (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) J. Razowski & J. Wojtusiak Abstract The paper consists of the data on 58 primary types and one paratype; colour illustrations of 61 adults are provided. Four new combinations are proposed. KEY WORD: Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Type species, Diakonoff. Descripción de los tipos de Tortricidae, 1. Tipos de las especies orientales en el Museo de Munich, descritos por A. Diakonoff (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Resumen El trabajo consiste en los datos de 58 tipos y un paratipo, se dan ilustraciones a color de 61 adultos. Se proponen cuatro nuevas combinaciones. PALABRAS CLAVE: Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, tipos, Diakonoff. Introduction This is the first paper of our new series on the type specimens of Tortricidae.
    [Show full text]
  • False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia (=Cryptophlebia) Leucotreta (Meyrick) [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae]
    Mini Risk Assessment False codling moth, Thaumatotibia (=Cryptophlebia) leucotreta (Meyrick) [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae] Robert C. Venette, Erica E. Davis, Michelle DaCosta, Holly Heisler, & Margaret Larson Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108 September 21, 2003 Introduction Thaumatotibia leucotreta is a significant pest of fruit trees and field crops in portions of Africa (CIE 1976, Zhang 1994). Until recently, this pest had been most commonly known as Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Komai 1999). A detailed description of the rationale for the name change is included in this document. For the sake of scientific accuracy, we refer to the false codling moth as T. leucotreta throughout this report. We hope the change does not cause confusion. To our knowledge the risks posed by this pest for US agriculture and native ecosystems have not been evaluated previously in a formal pest risk assessment. Figure 1. Larva and adult of T. leucotreta. Images not to scale. [Larval image from http://www.arc.agric.za/institutes/ itsc/main/avocado/moth.htm; Adult image from Georg Goergen/IITA Insect Museum, Cotonou, Benin as published in (CAB 2000)] 1. Ecological Suitability. Rating: Medium. Thaumatotibia leucotreta is native to the Ethiopian zoogeographic province and presently occurs in much of Sub- Saharan Africa (CIE 1976, CAB 2000). Climates in the area occupied by this pest can be characterized as tropical, dry or temperate (CAB 2000). The currently reported global distribution of T. leucotreta suggests that the pest may be most closely associated with biomes that are generally classified as desert and xeric shrubland, tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrubland; and tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey
    1 Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey ERIOCRANIOIDEA TISCHERIOIDEA ERIOCRANIIDAE TISCHERIIDAE Dyseriocrania griseocapitella (Wlsm.) Eriocraniella mediabulla Davis Coptotriche citripennella (Clem.) Eriocraniella platyptera Davis Coptotriche concolor (Zell.) Coptotriche purinosella (Cham.) Coptotriche clemensella (Cham). Coptotriche sulphurea (F&B) NEPTICULOIDEA Coptotriche zelleriella (Clem.) Tischeria quercitella Clem. NEPTICULIDAE Coptotriche malifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche crataegifoliae (Braun) Ectoedemia platanella (Clem.) Coptotriche roseticola (F&B) Ectoedemia rubifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche aenea (F&B) Ectoedemia ulmella (Braun) Asterotriche solidaginifoliella (Clem.) Ectoedemia obrutella (Zell.) Asterotriche heliopsisella (Cham.) Ectoedemia grandisella (Cham.) Asterotriche ambrosiaeella (Cham.) Nepticula macrocarpae Free. Asterotriche helianthi (F&B) Stigmella scintillans (Braun) Asterotriche heteroterae (F&B) Stigmella rhoifoliella (Braun) Asterotriche longeciliata (F&B) Stigmella rhamnicola (Braun) Asterotriche omissa (Braun) Stigmella villosella (Clem.) Asterotriche pulvella (Cham.) Stigmella apicialbella (Cham.) Stigmella populetorum (F&B) Stigmella saginella (Clem.) INCURVARIOIDEA Stigmella nigriverticella (Cham.) Stigmella flavipedella (Braun) PRODOXIDAE Stigmella ostryaefoliella (Clem.) Stigmella myricafoliella (Busck) Tegeticula yuccasella (Riley) Stigmella juglandifoliella (Clem.) Tegeticula baccatella Pellmyr Stigmella unifasciella (Cham.) Tegeticula carnerosanella Pellmyr
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Names of Pest Species in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera)
    RESEARCH Scientific Names of Pest Species in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Frequently Cited Erroneously in the Entomological Literature John W. Brown Abstract. The scientific names of several pest species in the moth meate the literature. For example, the subfamilial designation for family Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) frequently are cited erroneously in Olethreutinae (rather than Olethreutidae) was slow to be accepted contemporary entomological literature. Most misuse stems from the for many years following Obraztsov’s (1959) treatment of the group. fact that many proposed name changes appear in systematic treat- They even appear at both taxonomic levels (i.e., Olethreutinae and ments that are not seen by most members of the general entomologi- Olethreutidae) in different papers in the same issue of the Canadian cal community. Also, there is resistance among some entomologists Entomologist in the 1980s! (Volume 114 (6), 1982) Olethreutinae to conform to recently proposed changes in the scientific names of gradually was absorbed into the North America literature, espe- well-known pest species. Species names discussed in this paper are cially following publication of the Check List of the Lepidoptera Brazilian apple leafroller, Bonagota salubricola (Meyrick); western of America North of Mexico (Hodges 1983), which has served as a black-headed budworm, Acleris gloverana (Walsingham); and green standard for more than 20 years. budworm, Choristoneura retiniana (Walsingham). Generic names During preparation of a world catalog of Tortricidae (Brown discussed include those for false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leu- 2005), it became obvious to me that several taxonomically correct cotreta (Meyrick); grape berry moth, Paralobesia viteana (Clemens); combinations of important pest species were not in common use in pitch twig moth, Retinia comstockiana (Fernald); codling moth, the entomological literature.
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO PRA on Thaumatotibia
    EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE ET MEDITERRANEENNE POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES 13-19032 Pest Risk Analysis for Thaumatotibia leucotreta September 2013 EPPO 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir 75011 Paris www.eppo.int [email protected] This risk assessment follows the EPPO Standard PM 5/3(5) Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests (available at http://archives.eppo.int/EPPOStandards/pra.htm) and uses the terminology defined in ISPM 5 Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms (available at https://www.ippc.int/index.php). This document was first elaborated by an Expert Working Group and then reviewed by core members and by the Panel on Phytosanitary Measures and if relevant other EPPO bodies. It was finally approved by the Council in September 2013. Cite this document as: EPPO (2013) Pest risk analysis for Thaumatotibia leucotreta. EPPO, Paris. Available at http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Pest_Risk_Analysis/PRA_intro.htm 1 Guideline on Pest Risk Analysis Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests Version N°5 13-19032 (13-18307, 12-18121) Pest Risk Analysis for Thaumatotibia leucotreta Fig. 1 Adult of T. leucotreta Fig. 2 Larvae of T. leucotreta (courtesy Ms van der Straten) (courtesy Ms van der Straten) Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section A: Pest categorization Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Probability of entry of a pest Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Probability of establishment Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Conclusion of introduction Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Probability of spread Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Eradication, containment of the pest and transient populations Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Assessment of potential economic consequences Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Degree of uncertainty and Conclusion of the pest risk assessment Stage 3: Pest Risk Management Expert Working group for PRA for T.
    [Show full text]