DOCSLIB.ORG

Declaration of the Record of Decision, Operable Unit B-1 Former Adak Naval Complex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Declaration of the Record of Decision, Operable Unit B-1 Former Adak Naval Complex 1 FORMER ADAK NAVAL COMPLEX 2 DECLARATION OF THE RECORD OF DECISION, OPERABLE UNIT B-1 3 4 SITE NAME AND LOCATION 5 6 Operable Unit B-1 CERCLIS ID # AK4170024323 7 Adak Naval Complex 8 Adak Island, Alaska 9 10 STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE 11 12 This Record of Decision (ROD) presents the selected remedial actions for Operable Unit B-1 (OU B-1) at 13 the former Adak Naval Complex (NAF Adak or Adak military reservation) on Adak Island, Alaska. 14 OU B-1 includes 131 ordnance and explosives (OE) or unexploded ordnance (UXO) areas of concern 15 (AOCs, or sites). A ROD was prepared for OU A in 1999 and signed in 2000, which covered petroleum 16 sites and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites. An 17 additional ROD will be prepared for the areas of concern (AOCs) within OU B-2. The ROD for OU B-2 18 will be the final ROD for the former Adak Naval Complex on Adak Island, Alaska. 19 20 Naval Air Facility (NAF) Adak was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) in 1994. For technical and 21 administrative purposes, Adak was divided into two operable units (OUs), OU A and OU B in 1998. In 22 general, OU A encompasses the entire military reservation with respect to chemical contamination, while 23 OU B encompasses the entire military reservation with respect to ordnance contamination. OU B was 24 further subdivided into OU B-1 and OU B-2 to facilitate expedited transfer of real estate within OU B-1. 25 26 This decision document presents the Selected Remedy for OU B-1, which was chosen in accordance with 27 CERCLA (1980) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA); 42 28 United States Code (USC) Section 9601 et seq.; and, to the extent practicable, the National Oil and 29 Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This decision is based on the Administrative 30 Record for sites identified within OU B-1. 31 32 The State of Alaska concurs with the selected remedy. 33 34 ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE 35 36 The response actions selected in this Record of Decision are necessary to protect public health, welfare or 37 the environment from actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Such a 38 release or threat of release may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, 39 welfare, or the environment. 40 41 DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDIES 42 43 OU B-1 addresses all of the OE/UXO sites within the former Adak Naval Complex with the exception of 44 areas in the vicinity of Mt. Moffett and Andrew Lake. OU B-1 includes 131 sites containing OE/UXO 45 items. OE/UXO educational awareness programs and incorporation of deed notices in property transfer 46 documents will be implemented throughout the former Adak Naval Complex that will encompass these 131 47 sites. No Further Action (NOFA) is selected for 104 of the 131 sites. NOFA, as this term is used in this 48 ROD, includes the continuation of the Adak OE/UXO Awareness Program and the inclusion of a deed 49 notice pursuant to CERCLA § 120(h)(3)(A)(i) or other suitable information on OE/UXO in the Bureau of 50 Land Management permanent file concerning the conveyance. OE/UXO clearance to 4 feet below ground 51 surface (bgs) will be conducted at three of the 27 sites. Ground surface is defined as the interface between 52 surface vegetation and underlying mineral soil. The remaining 24 sites will undergo final characterization 53 and clearance to 4 feet bgs, as needed to support future land use. Disposal sites will be cleared to a depth of 54 4 feet below the lowest depth that OE/UXO is found or to bedrock, whichever is encountered first. Nine 55 targets in seven of the 24 sites will have soil sampled for explosives-related chemicals and soil removed, 56 treated, and disposed of, either on site or offsite, as necessary. The major components of the selected 57 remedies are summarized in the following section. 58 Final OU B-1 ROD 10-31-01 i 1 NO FURTHER ACTION (NOFA) 2 3 NOFA is selected for 104 of the OU B-1 sites, based on initial screening efforts by the Adak OU B Project 4 Team and on evaluations completed as part of the Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study (RI/FS) 5 process. NOFA, as this term is used in this ROD, includes the continuation of the Adak OE/UXO 6 Awareness Program and the inclusion of a deed notice pursuant to CERCLA § 120(h)(3)(A)(i) or other 7 suitable information on OE/UXO in the Bureau of Land Management permanent file concerning the 8 conveyance. 9 10 The major components of the NOFA Selected Remedy include: 11 12 • Continue the Adak OE/UXO awareness program for the foreseeable future and evaluate its 13 continuation as part of the 5-year CERCLA review process. The program applies to the entire 14 military reservation at Adak. This program is intended to familiarize island residents and visitors 15 with the history of ordnance use, storage, handling, and disposal on Adak Island; basic 16 characteristics of OE/UXO items on Adak; and the procedures that should be followed if a 17 suspected OE/UXO item is encountered. 18 19 • Provide copies of this ROD and the Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST) to the Bureau of 20 Land Management (BLM) to be maintained as part of the permanent file of conveyance 21 documentation. This information will summarize the known nature and extent of OE/UXO on 22 these sites and the depths of clearance actions taken. Reference to these documents and their 23 availability in the BLM permanent conveyance file will be included in the interim conveyance 24 executed by BLM. 25 26 UXO CLEARANCE TO 4 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE 27 28 Based on additional field investigation and documentation through the RI/FS process, 3 of the remaining 27 29 sites (C3-01A, C6-01A, and ML-01A) were recommended for OE/UXO Clearance to 4 feet bgs. 30 31 The major components of the selected remedy for the C3-01A, C6-01A, and ML-01A sites include: 32 33 • Remove all metallic debris from the surface that could interfere with geophysical surveys. 34 35 • Geophysically survey sites to find possible OE/UXO. 36 37 • Identify locations to dig for possible OE/UXO (based upon geophysical data). 38 39 • Re-locate and excavate identified targets to 4 feet bgs 40 41 • Dispose of OE/UXO by detonation in place or removal and treatment at a remote location 42 43 • In addition, disposal sites will be cleared to a depth of 4 ft below the lowest depth that OE/UXO 44 was found or to bedrock – whichever is encountered first. 45 46 SITES SELECTED FOR OBSERVATIONAL APPROACH AND PRESUMPTIVE CLEARANCE 47 (OAPC SITES) 48 49 The 24 other sites have been identified for final characterization and clearance to 4 feet bgs, as needed to 50 support future land use. These sites include the following: Combat Range 3 Sites C3-01B, -01C, -01D, 51 -01E, and C3-04A; Combat Range 8 Sites C8-01, -03 and -05A; Lake Jean Site LJ-01; Mitt Lake Sites 52 ML-01B, -02A, and -02B; Lake DeMarie Site DM-06A; Finger Bay Sites FB-01 and -04; Blind Cove Site 53 BC-01; Husky Pass Training Area (HP-01); the Shagak Bay Gun Emplacement (SH-01); the 20-mm, 40 54 mm, and 37-mm gun emplacements (GUN-01, -02, and –03); and the Ammo Pier sites, FBAP-02 and 55 AP-02, and FB-03 (see Section 13). OE/UXO that has been identified at these areas during past 56 investigations has been removed. 57 Final OU B-1 ROD 10-31-01 ii 1 The major components of the selected remedy for 15 of the 24 sites noted above are the same as for the 3 2 sites previously discussed. For these sites, implementing the remedy will first require gathering final 3 characterization data on the extent of ordnance contamination as part of an observational approach to 4 executing clearance at the site. However, at 9 sites (FB-01, FB-04, Husky Pass Training Area, the Shagak 5 Bay Gun Emplacement, 20-mm, 40-mm, and 37-mm gun emplacements, and the two Ammo Pier sites, 6 FBAP-02 and AP-02, a reconnaissance survey will be performed in addition to these activities. The 7 purpose of the reconnaissance survey is to better define the area for characterization through visual 8 inspections and with hand-held geophysical detectors, as needed. 9 10 SITES SELECTED FOR EXPLOSIVE-RELATED CHEMICAL INVESTIGATIONS 11 12 Based on field observations during OE/UXO clearance activities (for 9 targets in 7 sites of the 24 OAPC 13 sites), there is a potential for the presence of explosives-related chemical contamination in soils. The 14 selected remedy at these sites includes the following: 15 16 • Sample sites where explosives compounds may pose a risk to human receptors and excavate, 17 containerize, and treat and/or dispose contaminated soils (either on-site or off-site) that exceed cleanup 18 levels. 19 20 CHANGES TO THE REMEDY SINCE PUBLICATION OF THE PROPOSED PLAN 21 22 As a result of changes in site nomenclature since the publication of the Proposed Plan and Final RI/FS, the 23 identification of new sites, and the inclusion of former OU B-2 sites within OU B-1 to facilitate property 24 transfer, remedies in addition to those described in the Proposed Plan and above are described in Section 25 13.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Front Cover Back Cover
    Back Cover Front Cover Seaman Jun 17, 1999 - Oct 14, 1999 Mess Management Specialist Seaman Oct 15, 1999 - Jun 30, 1999 Mess Management Specialist Third Class Petty Officer Jul 1, 1999 - Oct 1, 2002 Culinary Specialist Second Class Petty Officer Oct 2, 2002 - Jul 13, 2005 Culinary Specialist First Class Petty Officer Jul 14, 2005 - Sep 15, 2008 Culinary Specialist Chief Petty Officer Sep 16, 2008 - Dec 31, 2009 Ensign The Navy Museum Supply Corps, USN Washington Navy Yard December 17, 2009 Jan 1, 2010 Designed by: www.pierreggeorges.com “ Therefore, since we have been made right in God’s sight by faith, we have peace with God because of what Jesus Christ our Lord has done for us. Because Official Party arrives of our faith, Christ has brought us into this place of highest privilege where we now stand, and we confidently and joyfully look forward to sharing God’s glory. National Anthem We can rejoice, too, when we run into problems and trials, for we know that they Mrs. Valerie Mitchell are good for us-they help us learn to endure. And endurance develops strength of character in us, and character strengthens our confident expectation of salvation. And this expectation will not disappoint us.” Invocation Bishop Kim Brown Romans 5:1-5a. Welcoming Remarks “ From the fruit of his words a man shall be satisfied with good, and the work LCDR Antonio Ting of a man’s hands shall come back to him[ as a harvest]. Fools think they need no advice, but the wise listen to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Action Memorandum Non Time Critical Removal Action Operable Unit B-2 Former Adak Naval Complex Adak Island, Alaska
    FINAL ACTION MEMORANDUM NON TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION OPERABLE UNIT B-2 FORMER ADAK NAVAL COMPLEX ADAK ISLAND, ALASKA Prepared by: NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND NORTHWEST SILVERDALE, WASHINGTON 9 JANUARY 2013 Action Memorandum Final OU B-2, NTCRA 9 January 2013 Former Adak Naval Complex, Adak Island, AK CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE 1 2. BACKGROUND AND SITE CONDITIONS 2 2.1 SITE HISTORY 2 2.2 SITE REGULATORY HISTORY 2 2.3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 8 2.4 LAND USE 11 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND ACTIONS 11 2.6 CURRENT ACTIONS 13 2.7 STATE AND LOCAL ACTIONS TO DATE 13 2.8 POTENTIAL FOR CONTINUED STATE/ LOCAL RESPONSE 13 2.9 ENGINEERING EVALUATION / COST ANALYSIS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 13 3. THEATS TO PUBLIC HEALTH OR WELFARE OR THE ENVIRONMENT AND STATUTORY AND REGULATORY AUTHORIES 15 3.1 SUMMARY OF ESHA AND MEC HA ASSESSMENT SCORES 15 3.2 CHEMICAL RISKS 17 3.3 RISK CONCLUSIONS 17 4. ENDANGERMENT DETERMINATION 18 5. PROPOSED ACTIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS 19 6. EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE SITUATION SHOULD ACTION BE DELAYED OR NOT TAKEN 21 7. OUTSTANDING POLICY ISSUES 22 8. RECOMMENDATIONS 23 9. REFERENCES 24 vi Action Memorandum Final OU B-2, NTCRA 9 January 2013 Former Adak Naval Complex, Adak Island, AK FIGURES Figure 1. Adak Island and Vicinity 3 Figure 2. OU B-2 Sites, Adak Island, Alaska 4 Figure 3. Locations of RAA-01 and RAA-03 (East and West) 5 Figure 4. Locations of RAA-02 and RAA-05 6 Figure 5. Location of RAA-04 7 TABLES Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GMD Extended Test Range Staffing Draft
    5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS Government Preparers Julia Hudson Elliott, Environmental Protection Specialist U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command M.A., 1976, Mathematics/Science Education, Michigan State University B.A., 1971, Secondary Education, Michigan State University Years of Experience: 24 David Hasley, Environmental Engineer U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command B.S., 1984, Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, Arlington Years of Experience: 17 Sharon G. Mitchell, Environmental Engineer, Environmental Division, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command B.S.E., 1991, Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville Years of Experience: 12 Contractor Preparers Ryan Boomsma, Planner, EDAW, Inc. B.S., 2000, Landscape Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Years of Experience: 3 Karen Brandt, Environmental Specialist, EDAW, Inc. B.A., 1975, San Diego State University Years of Experience: 27 Harry Bryson, Senior Environmental Scientist, EDAW, Inc. M.S., 1984, Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee - Knoxville M.S., 1979, Biology, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana B.S., 1981, Engineering Physics, University of Tennessee–Knoxville B.S., 1971, Life Sciences, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Years of Experience: 20 Jonathan D. Call, Geographic Information Systems Analyst, EDAW Inc. M.S., 2003, Environmental Geoscience/Geographic Information Systems, Mississippi State University B.S., 2001, Social Studies Education, Mississippi State University Years of Experience: 1 GMD ETR Draft EIS 5-1 Matthew M. Estes, Environmental Specialist, EDAW, Inc. M.S., 2000, Environmental Management, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama B.S., 1991, Environmental Science, University of California, Riverside Years of Experience: 11 Sue M.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Robert Buchanan
    Interview with Robert Buchanan Aleutian World War II National Historic Area Oral History Project October 9, 2008, Barberton, Ohio Interviewed and transcribed by Janis Kozlowski, National Park Service, Anchorage, Alaska This interview is part of the Aleutian World War II National Historic Area Oral History Project. The interview with Robert Buchanan was conducted via the telephone and recorded on a digital recorder. Copies of the audio file are preserved in mp3, wav, and wma formats and are on file at the offices of the National Park Service in Anchorage, Alaska. Janis Kozlowski: [0:00:00] So, can you tell me where you grew up? Robert Buchanan: In Barberton, Ohio. Janis Kozlowski: The same place that you …? Robert Buchanan: The same place I live. I’ve lived here 86 years. Janis Kozlowski: Wow. And so your whole family was there? Robert Buchanan: Uh, you mean my children and so forth? Janis Kozlowski: And your brothers and sisters and so forth? Robert Buchanan: Uh, well I’ve got … not really right now. I’ve got a sister in California and I have a son in Florida. I have one son here in Barberton, I have a daughter here in Barberton, a daughter in Wadsworth Ohio, and a daughter in North Canton, Ohio. Janis Kozlowski: So people are pretty scattered about now. Robert Buchanan: Right, yeah. [chuckling] But that don’t … they’re all pretty close together though, the towns are. Janis Kozlowski: Ok. [0:01:00] So did you become interested in aviation when you were a young kid? Robert Buchanan: Well, I might have been interested but getting into aviation in the Navy was kind of a [laughing], just kind of a mistake really.
    [Show full text]
  • 105–275 Military Construction Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1998
    S. HRG. 105±275 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2016 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEP- TEMBER 30, 1998, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 39±863 cc WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont SLADE GORTON, Washington DALE BUMPERS, Arkansas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey CONRAD BURNS, Montana TOM HARKIN, Iowa RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HARRY REID, Nevada ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah HERB KOHL, Wisconsin BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado PATTY MURRAY, Washington LARRY CRAIG, Idaho BYRON DORGAN, North Dakota LAUCH FAIRCLOTH, North Carolina BARBARA BOXER, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas STEVEN J. CORTESE, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director JAMES H. ENGLISH, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY CONSTRUCTION CONRAD BURNS, Montana Chairman KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas PATTY MURRAY, Washington LAUCH FAIRCLOTH, North Carolina HARRY REID, Nevada LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii TED STEVENS, Alaska (ex officio) ROBERT C.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Construction and Veterans Af- Fairs, and Related Agencies Appropria- Tions for Fiscal Year 2010
    S. HRG. 111–124 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AF- FAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIA- TIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 3082/S. 1407 MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, THE DE- PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense Department of Veterans Affairs Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 48–311 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio JACK REED, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BEN NELSON, Nebraska MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JON TESTER, Montana ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania CHARLES J.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutian World War II National Historic Area 2009 Calendar for It Is a Lonely Front—The Least-Known and Loneliest of All Our Far-Flung Fronts
    Aleutian World War II National Historic Area 2009 Calendar For it is a lonely front—the least-known and loneliest of all our far-flung fronts. These pilots are not fighting a glamorous war of blazing guns and gallant encounters in mid-air; they fight an unseen foe, and they fly and die alone. Their enemy is the weather. Their battlefield is a boulder-strewn beach scattered with tell-tale bits of twisted metal, or a snow-covered mountainside where the torn wing of a plane flaps emptily in the wind, or an icy strait into which a flaming bomber hisses into silence like an extinguished cigarette. They do not parachute to safety and a hero’s medal; they struggle for a few minutes in the numbing water until their ‘chute fills and drags them out of sight forever. Their citation reads, ‘Missing….’ Collier’s, March 27, 1943 The bombing of Dutch Harbor on June 3-4, 1942, just six months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, marked the beginning of the Aleutian Campaign. For 15 arduous months Allied airmen struggled to take the fight to the Japanese who were entrenched on Kiska and Attu in the western Aleutians. The American and Canadian military were forced to battle the weather as well as the enemy – and it was the weather that claimed more lives than the Japanese. With the Japanese driven from the Aleutians in August 1943, the stage was set for the US military to take the fight directly to enemy territory. The targets for the Empire Express missions were facilities on the islands of Paramushiro and Shimushu in the Kurile Islands of Japan and shipping.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX CII Ecological Risk Assessment
    APPENDIX CII Ecological Risk Assessment FINAL FOCUSED FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT Appendix CII.0 SWMU 62, New Housing Fuel Leak Revision No.: 0 U.S. Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest Date: 07/08/05 Contract No. N44255-02-D-2008 Page CII-iii Delivery Order 0037 CONTENTS CII ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT....................................................................................1 CII.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 CII.2 PROBLEM FORMULATION................................................................................2 CII.2.1 Ecological Setting .....................................................................................2 CII.2.2 Conclusion of Preliminary (Screening Level) Problem Formulation.......8 CII.3 LITERATURE CITED..........................................................................................10 ATTACHMENT CII-1 Ecological Checklist FIGURE CII-1 Ecological Conceptual Site Model, SWMU 62, New Housing Fuel Leak........................13 FINAL FOCUSED FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT Appendix CII.0 SWMU 62, New Housing Fuel Leak Revision No.: 0 U.S. Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest Date: 07/08/05 Contract No. N44255-02-D-2008 Page CII-1 Delivery Order 0037 CII ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT This section presents the findings of the ecological risk assessment of the New Housing Area site, Adak Island, Alaska. The risk assessment described in this section is deliberately limited to the evaluation of risks
    [Show full text]
  • Held up My Hand and Became a Sailor
    Lt William L. Maris, USN. (Ret) After graduating from HS in June 1938 and while still working part time as a “Deckhand” on the Guemes Island Ferry, that fall I went back to AHS in the spring and took a PG course in Business Math and typing. My Father and my Boss, decided it was time for me to get a real job (my Boss who had been a Chief Boatswain Mate in the Navy in WW-1), so off we went to the Navy Recruiting Office in Bellingham, WA. The Chief Petty Officer in Charge, asked Dad why he wanted me to join the Navy and Dad told the Chief there was no work in Anacortes and he was tired of feeding me so please sign me up! I was 20 years old the October 16th, 1939 and required my Fathers signature to Enlist. After getting the paper work done, four months on the waiting list, after we finally got a proper Birth Certificate with a “Gold Seal”, The Chief wouldn’t accept the Birth Certificates the State Statistics Office kept sending without the Seal on it. I ended up being 26 on the waiting list in the 13th Naval District. Around the first of December I received correspondence from the Naval Recruiting Office Seattle that I had been accepted and to report in to the Recruiting Office in the Federal Building in Seattle on 10 December 1939. After reporting in they logged me in and gave me a Voucher and sent me to the YMCA for dinner and berthing for the night and to report back to the Recruiting Officer at 0800 the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Air Facility Adak, AK
    DCN 1566 Naval Air Facility Adak, AK DOD RECOMMENDATION: Close NAF Adak, AK. CRITERIA DOD RECOMMENDATION MILITARY VALUE 20 of 20 FORCE STRUCTURE - - ASW force reductions ONE-TIME COSTS ($ M) 9.4 ANNUAL SAVINGS ($ M) 26 RETURN ON INVESTMENT 1997 (Immediate) NET PRESENT VALUE 354 BASE OPERATING BUDGET ($ M) 24.3 PERSONNEL ELIMINATED (MIL / CIV) 1044175 -- - ECONOMIC IMPACT (BRAC 95 / CUM) 10.4%/10.4 % ENVIRONMENTAL No Impact - ISSUES NAF Adak, AK ISSUE DoD POSITION COMMUNITY POSITION R&A STAFF FINDINGS Does closing NAF Adak result in The shift in location and The Alaska State Legislature Closing NAF Adak will result in reducing excess base capacity reduction in maritime patrol recently introduced a resolution reducing excess capacity and while maintaining Naval operations allows the closure of calling for taking steps to develop lowering operating costs. operational capability? NAF Adak and provides a a new community for the western corresponding reduction in excess Aleutions at NAF Adak. The capacity resolution proposes converting the Facility into one that can be used beneficially by the citizens of the Aleutions. -- Closure impact on Coast Guard Navy cannot subsidize Coast Coast Guard response - closure Closure will impact Coast Guard. Guard operations. Alternatives will not allow them to fhlfill Not sufficient to force Navy to exist for Coast Guard missions. retain. DRAFT DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET NAVAL AIR FACILITY ADAK. ALASKA INSTALLATION MISSION Naval Air Facility supports the anti-submarine warfare surveillance mission. DOD RECOMMENDATION The Navy wants to close the facility and is in the process of drawing down its presence there.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coldest Front: Cold War Military Properties in Alaska Revised and Expanded ______
    1 United States Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program _________ The Coldest Front: Cold War Military Properties in Alaska Revised and Expanded _________ Prepared in Cooperation with the Alaska State Historic Preservation Officer February 1996, August 2012 Stewardship ● Leadership ● Partnership 2 Legacy The Legacy Resource Management Program was established by the Congress of the United States in 1991 to provide the Department of Defense with an opportunity to enhance the management of stewardship resources on over 25 million acres of land under DoD jurisdiction. Legacy allows DoD to determine how to better integrate the conservation of irreplaceable biological, cultural and geophysical resources with the dynamic requirements of military missions. To achieve this goal, DoD gives high priority to inventorying, protecting, and restoring biological, cultural and geophysical resources in a comprehensive, cost-effective manner, in partnership with federal, state and local agencies and private groups. Legacy activities help to ensure that DoD personnel better understand the need for protection and conservation of natural and cultural resources and that the management of these resources will be fully integrated with and support DoD mission activities and the public interest. Through the combined efforts of the DoD components, Legacy seeks to achieve its legislative purposes with cooperation, industry and creativity, to make the DoD the federal environmental leader. ________________________________________________________________________ This document was prepared in partnership with Alaska State Historic Preservation Officer Judith E. Bittner Colorado State University Center for the Environmental Management of Military Lands Prepared by William J. Siedler Office of History and Archaeology Alaska Department of Natural Resources 550 W. 7th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing the Frontier Challenges and Solutions for U.S
    SECURING THE FRONTIER CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR U.S. POLAR MARITIME OPERATIONS BRYAN CLARK AND JESSE SLOMAN SECURING THE FRONTIER CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR U.S. POLAR MARITIME OPERATIONS BRYAN CLARK JESSE SLOMAN 2017 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2017 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Bryan Clark is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Prior to joining CSBA in 2013, Mr. Clark was special assistant to the Chief of Naval Operations and director of his Commander’s Action Group, where he led development of Navy strategy and implemented new initiatives in electromagnetic spectrum operations, undersea warfare, expeditionary operations, and personnel and readiness management. Mr. Clark served in the Navy headquarters staff from 2004 to 2011, leading studies in the Assessment Division and participating in the 2006 and 2010 Quadrennial Defense Reviews. His areas of emphasis were modeling and simulation, strategic planning, and institutional reform and governance. Prior to retiring from the Navy in 2007, Mr. Clark was an enlisted and officer submariner, serving in afloat and ashore submarine operational and training assignments, including tours as chief engineer and operations officer at the Navy’s nuclear power training unit.
    [Show full text]