DOCSLIB.ORG

Naval Air Facility Adak, AK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Naval Air Facility Adak, AK DCN 1566 Naval Air Facility Adak, AK DOD RECOMMENDATION: Close NAF Adak, AK. CRITERIA DOD RECOMMENDATION MILITARY VALUE 20 of 20 FORCE STRUCTURE - - ASW force reductions ONE-TIME COSTS ($ M) 9.4 ANNUAL SAVINGS ($ M) 26 RETURN ON INVESTMENT 1997 (Immediate) NET PRESENT VALUE 354 BASE OPERATING BUDGET ($ M) 24.3 PERSONNEL ELIMINATED (MIL / CIV) 1044175 -- - ECONOMIC IMPACT (BRAC 95 / CUM) 10.4%/10.4 % ENVIRONMENTAL No Impact - ISSUES NAF Adak, AK ISSUE DoD POSITION COMMUNITY POSITION R&A STAFF FINDINGS Does closing NAF Adak result in The shift in location and The Alaska State Legislature Closing NAF Adak will result in reducing excess base capacity reduction in maritime patrol recently introduced a resolution reducing excess capacity and while maintaining Naval operations allows the closure of calling for taking steps to develop lowering operating costs. operational capability? NAF Adak and provides a a new community for the western corresponding reduction in excess Aleutions at NAF Adak. The capacity resolution proposes converting the Facility into one that can be used beneficially by the citizens of the Aleutions. -- Closure impact on Coast Guard Navy cannot subsidize Coast Coast Guard response - closure Closure will impact Coast Guard. Guard operations. Alternatives will not allow them to fhlfill Not sufficient to force Navy to exist for Coast Guard missions. retain. DRAFT DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET NAVAL AIR FACILITY ADAK. ALASKA INSTALLATION MISSION Naval Air Facility supports the anti-submarine warfare surveillance mission. DOD RECOMMENDATION The Navy wants to close the facility and is in the process of drawing down its presence there. Currently, there are no assigned aircraft at Adak. Facility has decreased in size from 5000 to 1000. DOD JUSTIFICATION The Navy's anti-submarine warfare surveillance mission no longer requires these facilities to base or support it's aircraft. COST CONSIDERATIONS DEVELOPED BY DOD One-Time Cost: $9.4 million Net Savings During Implementation: $108 million Annual Recurring Savings: $26 million Break-Even Year: Immediate Net Present Value Over 20 Years: $354.8 million MANPOWER IMPLICATIONS OF THIS RECOMMENDATION (EXCLUDES CONTRACTORS) Military Civilian Students Baseline Reductions 1044 75 Realignments 0 0 Total 1044 75 DRAFT DRAFT MANPOWER IMPLICATIONS OF ALL RECOMMENDATIONS AFFECTING THIS INSTALLATION (INCLUDES ON-BASE CONTRACTORS AND STUDENTS) Out In Net Gain (Loss) Military Civilian Military Civilian Military Civilian 1044 7 5 0 0 (1 044) (75) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Closing the facility will have a positive effect on the environment since there are no other air emission sources in the area. REPRESENTATION Governor: Tony Knowles Senators: Ted Stevens Frank H. Murkowski Representative: Don Young ECONOMIC IMPACT '...&- Potential Employment Loss: 894 jobs (678 direct and 216 indirect) Adak, AK MSA Job Base: No local population Percentage: 10.4 Cumulative Economic Impact (year-year): 10.4 MILITARY ISSUES The facility has a ship berthing capacity but the piers are about 40 years old. The power and generator systems are old and the water system is old. It could be turned over to the Coast Guard or to NOAA, Interior, etc. CINCPACFLT however, has no further use for the facility and plans to continue it's anti-submarine mission out of the continental western U.S. COMMUNITY CONCERNSJISSUES None at this time. ITEMS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS Adak scored very low in the military value category. DRAFT 1995 DoD Recommendations and Justifications Naval Air Facility, Adak, Alaska Recommendation: Close Naval Air Facility, Adak, Alaska. Justification: Despite the large reduction in operational infrastructure accomplished during the 1993 round of base closure and realignment, since DON force structure experiences a reduction of over 10 percent by the year 2001, there continues to be additional excess capacity that must be eliminated. In evaluating operational bases, the goal was to retain only that infrastructure necessary to support the future force structure without impeding operational flexibility for deployment of that force. In the case of Naval Air Facility, Adak, ~laska,-theNavy's anti- submarine warfare surveillance mission no longer requires these facilities to base or support its aircraft. Closure of this activity reduces excess capacity by eliminating unnecessary capabilities and can be accomplished with no loss in mission effectiveness. Return on Investment: The total estimated one-time cost to implement this recommendation is $9.4 million. The net of all costs and savings during the implementation period is a savings of $108 million. Annual recurring savings after implementation are $26 million with an immediate return on investment expected. The net present value of the costs and savings over 20 years is a savings of $354.8 million. Impacts: Economic Impact on Communities: Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 894 jobs (678 direct jobs and 2 16 indirect jobs) over the 1996-to-200 1 period in the Aleutians West Census Area economic area, which is 10.4 percent of economic area employment. However, the geography of the Aleutian Islands localizes economic effects, and no loss is anticipated from the closure of NAF Adak beyond the direct job loss. Community Infrastructure Impact: There is no community infrastructure impact since there are no receiving installations for this recommendation. Environmental Impact: The closure of Naval Air Facility, Adak will have a positive effect on the environment in that, even though NAF Adak is in an attainment area for carbon monoxide, ozone, and PM- 10, a source of ozone will be removed, further improving already favorable air quality. In an area with few air emission sources present, cessation of air emissions from this facility will enhance the natural state of the western Alaska region. Also, there is no adverse impact on threatenedlendangered species, sensitive habitats and wetlands, or cultural/historical resources occasioned by this recommendation. BASE ANALYSIS Naval Air Facility Adak, AK DOD RECOMhgENDATION: Close Naval Air Facility, Adak, AK. CRITERIA DOD RECOMMENDATION 11 MILITARY VALUE I 20 of 20 11 FORCE STRUCTURE I Anti-Submarine Warfare Force Reduction ONE-TIME COSTS ($ M) I 9.4 ANNUAL SAVINGS ($ M) 2 6 RETTJRN ON INVESTMENT 1997 (Immediate) NET PRESENT VALUE ($M) I 354 - pp BASE OPERATING BUDGET ($ M) 24.3 I PERSONNEL ELIMINATED (MIL / CIV) 1044 / 75 PERSONNEL REALIGNED (MIL / CIV) 010 ECONOMIC IMPACT (BRAC 95 / CUM) 10.4% 1 10.4% ENVIRONMENTAL No Impact DRAFT DRAFT DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET NAVAL AIR FACILITY ADAK. AI( INSTALLATION MISSION Facility supports the anti-submarine warfare (AS W) surveillance mission. DOD RECOMMENDATION Close the Facility and save about $26 million in annual operating costs. DOD JUSTIFICATION A shift in the location of ASW operations and a reduction in maritime patrol operations allows the Navy to close NAF Adak and reduce excess capacity. SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 1. Closing Adak will reduce costs and excess capacity for the Navy, and at the same time allow for re-use of the facility. 1 >--) Staff Comment - Closing NAF Adak will result in reducing excess capacity and not reduce the Navy's ability to perform its ASW mission. 2. The Alaska State Legislature recently introduced a resolution calling for steps to develop a new community for the western Aleutians at NAF Adak. The state's resolution proposes converting the Facility into one that can be use beneficially by the citizens of the Aleutians. 3. The Coast Guard has expressed concern about the loss of NAF Adak as a support base for their air and sea operations. Staff Comment - The Coast Guard has been asked for more information about their concerns. Awaiting Navy response. R&A STAFF SUMMARY COMMENT Staff supports the DOD recommendation. D.L. Reedy/Navy/06/05/95 9:28 AM DRAFT THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 May 12, 1995 The Honorable Alan Dixon Chzirrnan, Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission 1700 North Moore Street Suite 1425 Arlington, VA 22209 gear Er. Chairman: The Coast Guard has a significant interest in the 1995 Base Closure and Realignment process. We are reviewing the list of clos~resand realignments provided by the Secretary of Defense and are assessing the impacts to our operations. We intend to provide comments directly to your staff, as well as through public hearings. h i~itialreview of the list provided by the Secretary of De'ense -** 1 indicztes the 2otential closure of Naval Air Facility Adak. This cacses creat concern as Adak is izL?ortznt fcr Coast Gua~dccttsr zne zircrafc operzzions in ckis ~rixaryo?erating Erea. The loss of Acak will cacse tke Coast G~ardto obi~insu~pcrt at a creater distance frcrn this 02erating zrez, izcrezs3.g ccsts 2nd time awzy frcn critical missions. I have enclosed z synopsis of the Coast Guard's use of Adak and other Depzrtment of Defense facilities in the Northern Pacific. In t5is tine ~f reinventing goverrzent, iz is essential that ye coniinue to meet oEr customers' needs. To that end, I ask that ycu consider she Coast Guard in your recon.nendazions to the President. Should you have questions, plezse contact me or Steven Palmer, ..Rssisrant Secretary for Governmentzl Affairs, at (202) 366-4573. Sincerely, SYNOPSIS OF COAST GJARD USE OF DOD NORTHERN PACIFIC FACILITIES .*.-.;. (._. .,....'I .& .. ."*n%--.";;co: "49czs;;z;PROBLEM: '.': The U. S . fishing trade in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4910-13 DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/21/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20567, and on govinfo.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Technical Amendment to Separate Terminal Airspace Areas from Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L Offshore Airspace Areas; Alaska AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the following Offshore Airspace Areas in Alaska: Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L. The FAA found an error with the Offshore Airspace Legal Descriptions containing airspace descriptions not related to the need to apply IFR en route Air Traffic Control services in international airspace. This action would correct that error by removing terminal airspace, airspace associated with geographic coordinates, and airspace associated with NAVAIDs from the Offshore Airspace legal descriptions. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, D.C. 20590; telephone: 1(800) 647-5527, or (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Cover Back Cover
    Back Cover Front Cover Seaman Jun 17, 1999 - Oct 14, 1999 Mess Management Specialist Seaman Oct 15, 1999 - Jun 30, 1999 Mess Management Specialist Third Class Petty Officer Jul 1, 1999 - Oct 1, 2002 Culinary Specialist Second Class Petty Officer Oct 2, 2002 - Jul 13, 2005 Culinary Specialist First Class Petty Officer Jul 14, 2005 - Sep 15, 2008 Culinary Specialist Chief Petty Officer Sep 16, 2008 - Dec 31, 2009 Ensign The Navy Museum Supply Corps, USN Washington Navy Yard December 17, 2009 Jan 1, 2010 Designed by: www.pierreggeorges.com “ Therefore, since we have been made right in God’s sight by faith, we have peace with God because of what Jesus Christ our Lord has done for us. Because Official Party arrives of our faith, Christ has brought us into this place of highest privilege where we now stand, and we confidently and joyfully look forward to sharing God’s glory. National Anthem We can rejoice, too, when we run into problems and trials, for we know that they Mrs. Valerie Mitchell are good for us-they help us learn to endure. And endurance develops strength of character in us, and character strengthens our confident expectation of salvation. And this expectation will not disappoint us.” Invocation Bishop Kim Brown Romans 5:1-5a. Welcoming Remarks “ From the fruit of his words a man shall be satisfied with good, and the work LCDR Antonio Ting of a man’s hands shall come back to him[ as a harvest]. Fools think they need no advice, but the wise listen to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Action Memorandum Non Time Critical Removal Action Operable Unit B-2 Former Adak Naval Complex Adak Island, Alaska
    FINAL ACTION MEMORANDUM NON TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION OPERABLE UNIT B-2 FORMER ADAK NAVAL COMPLEX ADAK ISLAND, ALASKA Prepared by: NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND NORTHWEST SILVERDALE, WASHINGTON 9 JANUARY 2013 Action Memorandum Final OU B-2, NTCRA 9 January 2013 Former Adak Naval Complex, Adak Island, AK CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE 1 2. BACKGROUND AND SITE CONDITIONS 2 2.1 SITE HISTORY 2 2.2 SITE REGULATORY HISTORY 2 2.3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 8 2.4 LAND USE 11 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND ACTIONS 11 2.6 CURRENT ACTIONS 13 2.7 STATE AND LOCAL ACTIONS TO DATE 13 2.8 POTENTIAL FOR CONTINUED STATE/ LOCAL RESPONSE 13 2.9 ENGINEERING EVALUATION / COST ANALYSIS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 13 3. THEATS TO PUBLIC HEALTH OR WELFARE OR THE ENVIRONMENT AND STATUTORY AND REGULATORY AUTHORIES 15 3.1 SUMMARY OF ESHA AND MEC HA ASSESSMENT SCORES 15 3.2 CHEMICAL RISKS 17 3.3 RISK CONCLUSIONS 17 4. ENDANGERMENT DETERMINATION 18 5. PROPOSED ACTIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS 19 6. EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE SITUATION SHOULD ACTION BE DELAYED OR NOT TAKEN 21 7. OUTSTANDING POLICY ISSUES 22 8. RECOMMENDATIONS 23 9. REFERENCES 24 vi Action Memorandum Final OU B-2, NTCRA 9 January 2013 Former Adak Naval Complex, Adak Island, AK FIGURES Figure 1. Adak Island and Vicinity 3 Figure 2. OU B-2 Sites, Adak Island, Alaska 4 Figure 3. Locations of RAA-01 and RAA-03 (East and West) 5 Figure 4. Locations of RAA-02 and RAA-05 6 Figure 5. Location of RAA-04 7 TABLES Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 212/Friday, October 31
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 64881 compliance with the requirements of National Archives and Records the airspace description revealed that it paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. Administration (NARA). For information on contained two items that were the availability of this material at NARA, call FAA AD Differences unnecessary. The Norton Sound Low (202) 741–6030, or go to: http:// _ 1,200 foot description for Selawik, AK, Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ www.archives.gov/federal register/ is not required. Similarly, the 1,200 ft. or service information as follows: No code_of_federal_regulations/ differences. ibr_locations.html. description for Control 1234L had duplicate references to Eareckson Air Other FAA AD Provisions Issued in Renton, Washington, on October Force Station. These two items are 9, 2008. (g) The following provisions also apply to addressed in the airspace descriptions Ali Bahrami, this AD: below. With the exception of editorial (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, changes, this amendment is the same as (AMOCs): The Manager, International Aircraft Certification Service. that proposed in the NPRM. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane [FR Doc. E8–25307 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am] These airspace areas are published in Directorate, FAA, has the authority to BILLING CODE 4910–13–P paragraph 6007 of FAA Order 7400.9R, approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested signed August 15, 2007, and effective using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. September 15, 2007, which is Send information to ATTN: Shahram DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcement
    Contact: Lorie Dankers TSA Public Affairs (206) 743-1497 [email protected] PRESS RELEASE @TSA_Pacific FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 9, 2021 TSA seeks to hire more than 170 airport security screening officers across Alaska TSA paying recruitment incentive of $1,000 to each newly-hired TSO in Alaska ANCHORAGE, Alaska - The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has launched a recruitment effort to hire more than 170 Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) in Alaska before summer 2021. Full- and part-time positions are available at 14 airports statewide. At Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, TSA is looking to hire 83 full- and part-time TSOs. At Fairbanks International Airport, TSA is hiring 13 TSOs and at Juneau International Airport, TSA is hiring 10. TSA is also hiring at Adak Airport; Bethel Airport; Cold Bay Airport; Dillingham Airport; Ketchikan International Airport; King Salmon Airport; Kodiak Airport; Merle K. (Mudhole) Smith Airport in Cordova; Nome Airport; Sitka Rocky Gutierrez Airport; and Wiley Post- Will Rogers Memorial Airport in Utqiagvik. As an incentive, TSA will pay newly hired TSOs $500 upon starting with the agency and $500 after one year of service with TSA. To qualify for the recruitment incentive, the employee must come onboard with TSA between March 14 and June 30, 2021. “TSOs are the backbone of our security operations, carrying out the essential mission of protecting the nation’s commercial air transportation system” said TSA Federal Security Director for Alaska Peter Duffy. “TSA Alaska is seeking motivated individuals at airports statewide to join our team. Now is the time to begin your federal career with TSA.” TSA is currently Benefits include paid training, annual and sick leave, health care plans for full- and part-time employees and a generous retirement plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Work Schedule 18 ‐ 19 Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Southcoast Region Winter Maintenance Schedule
    Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Southcoast Region Winter Maintenance Schedule Southeast District Winter Maintenance Schedule # (907) 465‐1763 Maintenance Station Hours of Operation Days of Operation Avg # of Operators Notes 0600‐1430 7 day a week 2/day 1 on tue‐Sat / 1 on Sun‐Thu Gustavus Airport & Highway 0430‐1400 Monday ‐ Friday 5/day Haines Airport & Highway 0700‐1530 Monday ‐ Friday 2/day Hoonah Airport & Highway Juneau Highway 0400‐2030 7 day a week 1/day & 8/grave 5 on Mon‐Fri / 4 on Sun‐Thu / 4 on Tue‐Sat 2/swing Ketchikan Highway 0400‐2230 Monday ‐ Friday 1/day & 1/swing 1/grave 0500 ‐ 14:30 Monday ‐ Friday 6/day Klawock Airport & Highway 0500‐1600 7 day a week 4/day 2 on Sun‐Wed / 2 on Wed‐Sat Petersburg Airport & Highway 7 day a week 1/day & 2/grave 1 on day Mon‐Fri / 1 on grave Sun‐ Wed Sitka Airport & Highway 04:00 ‐ 24:00 2 on grave Wed‐Sat / 2 on swing Sun‐Wed 2/swing 2 on swing Wed‐Sun 06:00 ‐ 1630 7 day a week 5/day 2 on Mon‐Thu / 1 on Tue‐Fri / 1 on Thu‐Sun Skagway Airport & Highway 1 on Sat‐Tue 06:00 ‐ 17:00 7 day a week 3/day 1 on Mon‐Fri / 1 on Sun‐Wed / 1 on Wed‐Sat Wrangell Airport & Highway 0800‐1900 7 day a week 5/day 3 on Sun‐Wed / 2 on Wed‐Sat Yakutat Airport & Highway Winter Work Schedule 18 ‐ 19 Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Southcoast Region Winter Maintenance Schedule Kodiak/Aleutian District Winter Maintenance Schedule # (907) 487‐4952 Maintenance Station Hours of Operation Days of Operation Avg # of Operators Notes Adak Airport 08:00 ‐ 18:00 Saturday ‐ Wednesday 1 No maintenance on Thursday/Friday Akutan Airport 07:00 ‐ 20:00 Daily 2 Cold Bay Airport 07:00 ‐ 16:00 Daily 2 Iliamna Airport 08:00 ‐ 17:00 Monday ‐ Friday 2 No maintance on Saturday/Sunday King Salmon Airport 06:00 ‐ 20:00 Daily 2 King Salmon 06:00 ‐ 20:00 Daily 1 Kodiak Airport 05:00 ‐ 22:00 Daily 3 2 operators daily, 1 swing shift Kodiak 06:00 ‐ 19:30 Monday ‐ Friday 2 07:00 ‐ 15:30 Saturday ‐ Sunday 1 Unalaska Airport 07:00 ‐ 19:30 Monday ‐ Friday 3 08:00 ‐ 19:30 Saturday ‐ Sunday 1 Winter Work Schedule 18 ‐ 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Nextgen Aviators Alaska Airmen Association and Civil Air Patrol Promote Youth Outreach Programs
    Summer 2019 NextGen Aviators Alaska Airmen Association and Civil Air Patrol Promote Youth Outreach Programs Youth and young professionals dreaming about becoming a pilot can find inspiration at the Great Alaska Avi- ation Gathering. At this year’s Gathering, a specific area with nine stations offered interactive activities such as airplane design, safety wiring, and a VR Drone Simulator. They had over 500 youth and young profession- al visitors. The Alaska Airmen Association is steadily increasing their youth outreach programs with their NextGen Aviators group made up of volunteer members and aviation partners. They are launching a Middle School Outreach Program, first in the Anchorage school district and then expanding to other districts out to rural Alaska. The NextGen Aviator group is working on great partnerships to make flight training, ground school, and further specialized education more available to students in Alaska. If you or your child are inter- ested in joining the NextGen Aviators Group contact them at (907) 245-1251 or online at www.alaskaairmen.org/nextgen. (L) The Gathering has interac- tive activities to get youth and young professionals excited about aviation. ( R) Airmen Association Out- reach Director Oscar Sigl with EXCEL Alaska Ground School Students. Any student interested in pursuing a career in aviation should check out the Civil Air Patrol Cadet Program. This year-round program is open to all students, 12 and up, and is where Cadets fly, learn to lead, hike, camp, get in shape, and push themselves to new limits. CAP cadets and senior members wear the US Air Force uniform since they are an official auxiliary of the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources Section
    ALEUTIANS SUBAREA CONTINGENCY PLAN RESOURCES SECTION RESOURCES: PART ONE – COMMUNITY PROFILES............................................................................................... B-1 A. Regional Organizations ................................................................................................................................. B-1 B. Community Profiles ...................................................................................................................................... B-3 RESOURCES: PART TWO – EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................. B-32 A. Commercially Available Equipment ............................................................................................................ B-33 B. Non-commercially Available Equipment .................................................................................................... B-35 C. Industry Spill Cooperative Equipment ........................................................................................................ B-38 RESOURCES: PART THREE – INFORMATION DIRECTORY .................................................................................... B-39 A. Airports and Air Services ............................................................................................................................ B-40 B. Birds and Other Wildlife ............................................................................................................................. B-41
    [Show full text]
  • DHS) Annual Reports on the Total Number of SSI Records Generated, 2005-2007
    Description of document: U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) annual reports on the total number of SSI records generated, 2005-2007 Requested date: 30-September-2008 Released date: 19-February-2009 Posted date: 16-September-2009 Date/date range of document: 2005 - 2007 Source of document: Director, Disclosure & FOIA The Privacy Office U.S. Department of Homeland Security 245 Murray Drive SW, Building 410 STOP-0655 Washington, DC 20528-0655 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, OC 20528 Homeland Security February 19,2009 Re: DHSIMGMT 09-38 This is the final response to your September 30,2008, Freedom ofInformation Act (FOIA) request to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for a copy of each annual report on the total number of SSI records generated.
    [Show full text]
  • GMD Extended Test Range Staffing Draft
    5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS Government Preparers Julia Hudson Elliott, Environmental Protection Specialist U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command M.A., 1976, Mathematics/Science Education, Michigan State University B.A., 1971, Secondary Education, Michigan State University Years of Experience: 24 David Hasley, Environmental Engineer U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command B.S., 1984, Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, Arlington Years of Experience: 17 Sharon G. Mitchell, Environmental Engineer, Environmental Division, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command B.S.E., 1991, Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville Years of Experience: 12 Contractor Preparers Ryan Boomsma, Planner, EDAW, Inc. B.S., 2000, Landscape Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Years of Experience: 3 Karen Brandt, Environmental Specialist, EDAW, Inc. B.A., 1975, San Diego State University Years of Experience: 27 Harry Bryson, Senior Environmental Scientist, EDAW, Inc. M.S., 1984, Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee - Knoxville M.S., 1979, Biology, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana B.S., 1981, Engineering Physics, University of Tennessee–Knoxville B.S., 1971, Life Sciences, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Years of Experience: 20 Jonathan D. Call, Geographic Information Systems Analyst, EDAW Inc. M.S., 2003, Environmental Geoscience/Geographic Information Systems, Mississippi State University B.S., 2001, Social Studies Education, Mississippi State University Years of Experience: 1 GMD ETR Draft EIS 5-1 Matthew M. Estes, Environmental Specialist, EDAW, Inc. M.S., 2000, Environmental Management, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama B.S., 1991, Environmental Science, University of California, Riverside Years of Experience: 11 Sue M.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Robert Buchanan
    Interview with Robert Buchanan Aleutian World War II National Historic Area Oral History Project October 9, 2008, Barberton, Ohio Interviewed and transcribed by Janis Kozlowski, National Park Service, Anchorage, Alaska This interview is part of the Aleutian World War II National Historic Area Oral History Project. The interview with Robert Buchanan was conducted via the telephone and recorded on a digital recorder. Copies of the audio file are preserved in mp3, wav, and wma formats and are on file at the offices of the National Park Service in Anchorage, Alaska. Janis Kozlowski: [0:00:00] So, can you tell me where you grew up? Robert Buchanan: In Barberton, Ohio. Janis Kozlowski: The same place that you …? Robert Buchanan: The same place I live. I’ve lived here 86 years. Janis Kozlowski: Wow. And so your whole family was there? Robert Buchanan: Uh, you mean my children and so forth? Janis Kozlowski: And your brothers and sisters and so forth? Robert Buchanan: Uh, well I’ve got … not really right now. I’ve got a sister in California and I have a son in Florida. I have one son here in Barberton, I have a daughter here in Barberton, a daughter in Wadsworth Ohio, and a daughter in North Canton, Ohio. Janis Kozlowski: So people are pretty scattered about now. Robert Buchanan: Right, yeah. [chuckling] But that don’t … they’re all pretty close together though, the towns are. Janis Kozlowski: Ok. [0:01:00] So did you become interested in aviation when you were a young kid? Robert Buchanan: Well, I might have been interested but getting into aviation in the Navy was kind of a [laughing], just kind of a mistake really.
    [Show full text]
  • 105–275 Military Construction Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1998
    S. HRG. 105±275 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2016 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEP- TEMBER 30, 1998, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 39±863 cc WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont SLADE GORTON, Washington DALE BUMPERS, Arkansas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey CONRAD BURNS, Montana TOM HARKIN, Iowa RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HARRY REID, Nevada ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah HERB KOHL, Wisconsin BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado PATTY MURRAY, Washington LARRY CRAIG, Idaho BYRON DORGAN, North Dakota LAUCH FAIRCLOTH, North Carolina BARBARA BOXER, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas STEVEN J. CORTESE, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director JAMES H. ENGLISH, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY CONSTRUCTION CONRAD BURNS, Montana Chairman KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas PATTY MURRAY, Washington LAUCH FAIRCLOTH, North Carolina HARRY REID, Nevada LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii TED STEVENS, Alaska (ex officio) ROBERT C.
    [Show full text]