Geology of the Mt. Gausta Region in Telemark, Norway By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gausdal, Øyer Og Lillehammers Veteranplan 2019-2023
Gausdal, Øyer og Lillehammers VETERANPLAN 2019 - 2023 Grunnlaget bak en veteranplan Ivaretakelsen av veteraner fra internasjonale ope- Det nedsettes en arbeidsgruppe med personer rasjoner er et samfunnsansvar for alle sektorer, med relevant kompetanse, og personer med an- men kanskje spesielt for den tilhørende kommu- svar for ulike kommunale tjenester som anses å ne. være aktuelle for målgruppen. Siden 1947 har 100 000 nordmenn tjenestegjort Arbeidsgruppen skal utarbeide en Veteranplan i internasjonale operasjoner på våre vegne. Dette med tilhørende handlingsplan. Planen skal omfatter 100 operasjoner på fire kontinenter. fokusere på behov til veteraner og deres familier, Siden oppstarten av FN-operasjonen i Libanon i med utgangspunkt i anbefalinger gitt fra Regje- 1978 har mer enn 40 000 bidratt i fredens tjenes- ringen, tilpasset lokale forhold. Planene skal te for Norge og det internasjonale samfunnet. være kortfattet og konkret. De siste årene er det fra myndighetenes side viet Kommunene har en sentral rolle å sørge for at økt oppmerksomhet til veteraner. I 2014 kom re- dets innbyggere har det godt. Veteranplanen gjeringen med en oppfølgingsplan for ivaretakel- for Øyer, Gausdal og Lillehammer kommuner se av personell, før, under og etter internasjonal bygger videre på Regjeringens oppfølgingsplan, tjeneste. I denne oppfølgingsplanen oppfordres og fokuserer tiltakene sine på temaene anerkjen- kommuner som har innbyggere som har vært i nelse, ivaretakelse og oppfølging. internasjonal tjeneste, å utarbeide en kommunal handlingsplan. Regional rådmannsgruppe for I Lillehammer kommune er det oppført 338 Øyer, Gausdal og Lillehammer kommuner ga veteraner som har tjenestegjort fra 1978 frem til i derfor følgende mandat til en arbeidsgruppe: dag. I Gausdal kommune er det registrert 51 og i Øyer kommune 40. -
A Perspective on Medieval Perception of Norwegian Church Art 53
A perspective on Abstract This paper discusses the broad use of imitation techniques to give the impression of medieval perception of precious materials in Norwegian religious sacred art, with special attention to polychrome wooden objects Norwegian church art from the thirteenth century. The question of how ictive objects made out of wood, covered with chalk ground, metal foil and paint were accepted as key works of art in religious devotion is examined. What Kaja Kollandsrud the objects intended to emulate and how they could compete with precious objects will be discussed. Supporting evidence is ofered from the preserved sacred polychrome sculpture and panel paintings in Norway from the period. What makes an imitation successful is discussed in terms of the factors that contribute to the intended illusion. This is argued in relation to the attitudes towards display of such objects at the time they were installed within the church, which takes them out of the modern constraining concept of art and material value. Introduction he use of painterly materials and techniques to imitate precious metals, stone, pearls, gems, high status textiles and fur is characteristic for the painted objects from the early Middle Ages and throughout the thirteenth century in Norway as elsewhere in Europe. he Church in this period appears to have had no qualms about the emulation of such costly and precious items, as skilled imitation was common practice. In the modern attitude towards imitations, they are generally considered to be cheaper versions of the original. Although the word ‘imitation’ might suggest inferiority in our minds, these polychrome works served as iconic objects in the interiors of medieval churches.1 here were however limits to the substitution of rare and valuable materials with more readily available and cheaper materials. -
Pantebøker: Oppland Fylke Dagens Tidligere Inndeling Sorenskriverembete Pantebøker I SAH Kommunenavn Finnes T.O.M
Pantebøker: Oppland fylke Dagens Tidligere inndeling Sorenskriverembete Pantebøker i SAH kommunenavn finnes t.o.m. 1950. (2016) Yngre protokoller er registrert her Dovre Dovre gnr. 1-73. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Lesja i 1863. Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger Gnr. 23/3 overført til Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. Alvdal fra 1910, gnr. 02.01.1951. 178/1 i Alvdal. Lesja Lesja gnr. 1-145. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Dovre gnr. 1-73 (fradelt Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger 1863). Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. Øvre Folldalen til Alvdal (Alvdal: Nord-Østerdal) 02.01.1951. (Lille-Elvedalen) i Hedmark fylke 1864, gnr. 79-172. Skjåk Skjåk gnr. 1-128. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Lom i 1866. Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 02.01.1951. Lom Lom gnr. 1-139. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skjåk gnr. 1-128 (fradelt Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger 1866). Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 02.01.1951. Sel Heidal, gnr. 172-197. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Vågå 1908 Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger (Slått sammen med Sel Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- -(C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 1964.) 02.01.1951. Sel Sel, gnr. 198-300. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Vågå 1908. Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger (Slått sammen med Heidal Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 1964.) 02.01.1951. Vågå Vågå gnr. 1-284. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Heidal gnr. 172-197 Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger (fradelt 1908). Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. -
Knut Døscher Master.Pdf (1.728Mb)
Knut Kristian Langva Døscher German Reprisals in Norway During the Second World War Master’s thesis in Historie Supervisor: Jonas Scherner Trondheim, May 2017 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Preface and acknowledgements The process for finding the topic I wanted to write about for my master's thesis was a long one. It began with narrowing down my wide field of interests to the Norwegian resistance movement. This was done through several discussions with professors at the historical institute of NTNU. Via further discussions with Frode Færøy, associate professor at The Norwegian Home Front Museum, I got it narrowed down to reprisals, and the cases and questions this thesis tackles. First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Jonas Scherner, for his guidance throughout the process of writing my thesis. I wish also to thank Frode Færøy, Ivar Kraglund and the other helpful people at the Norwegian Home Front Museum for their help in seeking out previous research and sources, and providing opportunity to discuss my findings. I would like to thank my mother, Gunvor, for her good help in reading through the thesis, helping me spot repetitions, and providing a helpful discussion partner. Thanks go also to my girlfriend, Sigrid, for being supportive during the entire process, and especially towards the end. I would also like to thank her for her help with form and syntax. I would like to thank Joachim Rønneberg, for helping me establish the source of some of the information regarding the aftermath of the heavy water raid. I also thank Berit Nøkleby for her help with making sense of some contradictory claims by various sources. -
The Race for Norwegian Heavy Ater, 1940-1945 Table of Contents
IFS Info 4/1995 Olav Njolstad Ole Kristian Grimnes Joachim RBnneberg Bertrand Goldschmidt The Race for Norwegian Heavy ater, 1940-1945 Table of Contents Olav Nj0lstad : Introduction .............................................................................................. :........ 5 Ole Kristian Grimnes : The Allied heavy water operations at Rjukan .................................................. 7 Joachim R0nneberg : Operation "Gunnerside": Reminiscences of a heavy water saboteur ............ 13 Bertrand Goldschmidt : The supplies of Norwegian heavy water to France and the early development of atomic energy ......................................................... 17 Introduction By Olav Njl!llstad The sabotage action against Norsk Hydro's heavy that the Norwegian-Allied heavy water operations water factory at Vemork, Rjukan, in February 1943 "may be considered the first attempt to secure the was undoubtedly one of the most astonishing and non-proliferation of nuclear weapons by military heroic Norwegian-Allied operations in Norway action", and he discusses what kind oflegacy they during the Second World War. Its blend of high represent in that respect. politics, scientific adventure, military drama and In the second paper, Joachim RIilnneberg, who individual courage has intrigued people for more at the age of22 led the sabotage action in February than fifty years. Numerous accounts of the event 1943, shares with us his memories of that dramatic have been made, including two commercial films, event. In addition to the many fascinating details and in Norsk Industriarbeidermuseum (the Norwe about how the sabotage was planned and executed, gian Industrial Workers Museum) at Rjukan there the reader will find some very valuable reflections is now a permanent exhibition of related sabotage on why that particular operation became such a memorabilia. On each anniversary hundreds of huge success. -
Helseregion Sør-Gudbrandsdal
Interkommunalt samarbeid om primærhelsetjenester i Helseregion Sør-Gudbrandsdal Hovedavtale Hovedavtale - Helseregion Sør-Gudbrandsdal Innholdsfortegnelse 1. Parter ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Bakgrunn og lovverk ………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 3. Formål…………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………. 2 4. Om organiseringen av samarbeidet i Helseregion Sør-Gudbrandsdal………………………………..3 5. Vertskommune og utviklingssamarbeid ………………………………………………………………………...5 6. Vertskommunensplikter……………………………………………………………………………………….……..…6 7. Samarbeidskommunens plikter…………………………………………………………………………….………..7 8. Prinsipielle saker………………………………..…………………………………………………………………………7 9. Budsjett, regnskap, og økonomiske oppgjøret……………………………………………………………......7 10. Om klage, kontroll og tilsyn……………………………………………………………………………………….….8 11. Om nærmere regler for utvidelse av samarbeidet………………………………………………….………8 12. Varighet………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 13. Nærmere regler for uttreden, mislighold, og avvikling av samarbeidet……………………..……9 14. Tvister………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...………9 15. Ikrafttreden og revisjon………………………………………………………………………………………..……...9 16. Dato og underskrifter………………….………………………………………………………………………….…....9 1 Hovedavtale - Helseregion Sør-Gudbrandsdal 1. Parter Avtalen er inngått mellom Gausdal kommune, Lillehammer kommune, Nord-Fron kommune, Ringebu kommune, Ringsaker kommune, Sør-Fron -
Lithostratigraphy and U-Pb Geochronology of the Telemark Supracrustals in the Bandak-Sauland Area, Te Le Mark, South Norway
NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Lithostratigraphy and geochronologyof the Telemark supracrustals 119 U-Pb lithostratigraphy and geochronology of the Telemark supracrustals in the Bandak-Sauland area, Telemark, South Norway Kauko Laajoki, Fernando Corfu & Tom Andersen Laajoki, K., Corfu, F. &Andersen, T.: Lithostratigraphy and U-Pb geochronology of the Telemark supracrustals in the Bandak-Sauland area, Te le mark, South Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift,Vol. 82, pp. 119-138. Trondheim 2002, ISSN 029-196X. The Mesoproterowic Te lemark supracrustals in southern Norway have been subdivided into four groups: (l) the ca. 1500 Ma volcanic Rjukan group overlain by (2) the quartzite-dominatedSeljord group, itself overlain by (3) the ca. 1160 Ma volcanic-sedimentary Bandak group in the west and by (4) the undated Heddal group in the east. New mapping and U-Pb work provide considerable refinement to this stratigraphy. The Ljosdals vatnet porphyry near the base of the Bandak gro up has an age of 1155 ± 3 Ma age, but it overlies that part of the Seljord gro up, which was folded and eroded before deposition of the Bandak gro up. The Brunkeberg porphyry, which has previously been correlated to the Rjukan gro up, yields an identical age of 1155 ± 2 Ma. It is unconformably overlain by a quartzite, which has also been included into the Seljord group. This group must, therefore, consist of two separate successions separated by a period of folding, here referred to as the Vindeggengro up (older) and the Lifiellgro up (younger). The former represents a thick, fluvial,shallow sea sandstone - intertidal heterolithic sequence, whereas the latter is composed of a relati vely thin and mature beach-shoreline sandstone sequence. -
Powered by Telemark Datasenter Og Ringvirkninger
Forprosjekt: Powered by Telemark Datasenter og ringvirkninger Audun Mogen Direktør Rjukan Næringsutvikling AS Torkild Follaug Prosjektleder Desember 2012 Merk: Utkast under utvikling Dette sier Facebook om Rjukan “Telemark and Rjukan have many unique features that make it attractive within the global market for unique server park locations. The most notable features include: a robust, redundant electrical grid, inexpensive and green hydro energy, and an ideal climate for data center cooling. In addition, Norway is a politically and economically stable nation that is well suited for data centers and will continue to be a strong contender for site selectors interested in locating in Europe.“ Rachel Peterson, Facebook 06.12.2012 2 ”Powered by Telemark” • Aktiv organisering av • Audun Mogen, Rjukan næringsutvikling kompetansemiljøene knyttet til • Espen Remman, NSA Crayon/Nydro AS datasentersatsingen skaper bedre • John Terje Veseth, NUAS grobunn for utviklingsprosjekter og • Thor Oscar Bolstad, HIP økt evne til å gripe mulighetene hvor • Torkil Bjørnson, NCE Systems Engineering og når de oppstår. Prosjektet styrker • Lise Wiik, Telemark fylkeskommune regionens attraktivitet og kapasitet for • Ole Sten Volland, Tinn Energi, ATB Nett næringsutvikling. • Tommy Odinsen, Innovason Norge • Torkild Follaug, Prosjektleder 06.12.2012 3 Ringvirkninger • Prosjektet skal gjennom en nettverksplan identifisere og engasjere kompetansemiljøer som vil bidra til at datasenterprosjektene i regionen blir konkurransedyktige på pris og miljø gjennom kompetanse, -
On the Lower Didymograptus Zone (3 B) at Ringsaker, and Contemporaneous Deposit S in Scandinavia
138 NORSK GEOLOGISK TIDSSKRIFT 30. ON THE LOWER DIDYMOGRAPTUS ZONE (3 B) AT RINGSAKER, AND CONTEMPORANEOUS DEPOSIT S IN SCANDINAVIA BY STEINAR SKJESETH Contents. Abstract ......................................................... 138 Acknowledgement 139 Introduction 139 Histo11ical account of earlier research . 139 An introduction to the stratigraphy and tectonics of Southern Ringsaker 140 The Lower Didymograptus Zone (3 b) at Ringsaker . 143 Notes on the sediments . 147 Correlation of the 3 b sediments in Scandinavia . 148 The Planilimbata Limestone, "The Planilimbata Zone" . 155 Systematic description of trilobites . 156 Family Agnostidae . !57 Remopleurdiidae . 157 Asaphidae . 158 Styginidae 171 Oheiruridae . 17 3 Lichadidae . 174 Ceratopygidae . 175 Raphiophoridae 176 References . 179 Expanation of plates . 173 A b s t ra c t. The two upper sub-zones of the Lower Didymograptus Beds (3 b) appear in limestone-trilobite facies at Heramb, Ringsaker, Nor way. The layers at Heramb correspond to the Planilim:bata Limestone, or part of it, and the beds are correlated with corresponding deposits elsewhere in Scandinavia. The 3 b sediments are deposited in a more or less closed basin on the Scandinavian Foreland. In this basin the different facies of the 3 b sediments have a dtstinct distl'libution. The trilobites from the upper sub zones of 3 b at Heramb are described, among them three new trilobite species: Megalaspis Tingsakerensis sp. n. Ptychopyge herambensis sp. n. mi-noT sp. n. Ampyx �:olborthi Schm[dt is transferred to the genus Lonchodornas. LOWER DIDYMOGRAPTUS ZONE 139 ACKNOWL EDG EM ENT It is a pleasure to express my heartiest and most sincere thanks to Professor L. Størmer and Curator G. -
Fremlegg: DELEGASJONSSAKER PLANUTVALGET 12.06.15
Saksframlegg Ark.: 033 Lnr.: 4766/15 Arkivsaksnr.: 15/1095-1 Saksbehandler: Randi Solberg Kristiansen DELEGASJONSSAKER PLANUTVALGET 12.06.15 14/1655 03.03.2015 DS 55/15 LAND//GUHA GNRLG 145/1 Ivar Jr Bø, Gausdalsvegen 1371, 2656 FOLLEBU Søknad innvilget GODKJENNING AV PLAN FOR DIVERSE PLANERINGS- OG OPPFYLLINGSARBEIDER PÅ EIENDOMMEN BØ, G/BNR. 145/1 I GAUSDAL 15/17 19.03.2015 DS 70/15 LAND//ANLU V83 Bjørner Ekerhaugen, Vestringsvegen 2807, 2657 SVATSUM Søknad innvilget DELEGERT VEDTAK PÅ SØKNAD OM BYGGING AV LANDBRUKSVEG BJØRNER EKERHAUGEN GNR/BNR 87/1 GAUSDAL KOMMUNE 15/534 07.04.2015 DS 80/15 TEK//BJNY GNR 225/16 Siviling. Knut Byfuglien, Bakkalykkja 7, 2614 LILLEHAMMER Søknad innvilget TILLATELSE TIL BRUKSENDRING FRA BOD TIL TEKNISK ROM MED NYTT VENTILASJONSAGGREGAT G/BNR 225/16 ØSTRINGSVEGEN 1. TILTAKSHAVER ME-LØ EIENDOM AS 15/571 07.04.2015 DS 81/15 TEK//JMHO GNR 238/1/163 Turid og Egil Rugsveen,Grønlandsvegen 65, 2651 ØSTRE GAUSDAL Søknad innvilget TILLATELSE TIL TILTAK - G/BNR 238/1/163 BRUKSENDRING AV UTHUS TIL ANNEKS OG OPPFØRING AV NYTT UTHUS I HEMTJØNNVEGEN 62 P PÅ VÆRSKEI. TILTAKSHVAVER: TURID OG EGIL RUGSVEEN 15/503 07.04.2015 DS 82/15 TEK//BJNY GNR 145/59 Jøra Bygg AS, Heimstadjordet 15, 2656 FOLLEBU Søknad innvilget TILLATELSE TIL OPPFØRING AV FRITIDSBOLIG PÅ G/BNR 145/59 NERSETERVEGEN 31 PÅ SKEI TILTAKSHAVER TORILL OG TERJE KJØS 15/575 07.04.2015 DS 83/15 TEK//JMHO GNR 241/1 Jan Roger Solberg, Vestringsvegen 1665, 2653 VESTRE GAUSDAL Søknad innvilget TILLATELSE TIL TILTAK - G/BNR 241/1 REHABILITERING AV PIPE OG MONTERING AV NY STÅLPIPE I I ØVRE SVATSUM SAMEIE TILTAKSHAVER: ANNE-GUNN VADHEIM 15/513 08.04.2015 DS 84/15 TEK//ESVI GNR 170/5 Oddvar Klophus, Myrengvegen 2, 2652 SVINGVOLL Søknad innvilget TILLATELSE TIL FRADELING - G/BNR 170/5 - EN PARSELL PÅ CA. -
The Precambrian Rocks of the Telemark Area in South Central Norway XIII
The Precambrian rocks of the Telemark area in south central Norway XIII: STRATIGRAPHIC STUDIES OF HIGH-GRADE METAMORPHIC ROCKS EAST OF FYRESDAL JAMES H. STOUT Stout, J. H.: Stratigraphic studies of high-grade metamorphic rocks east of Fyresdal. The Precambrian rocks of the Telemark area in south central Norway XIII. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 52, pp. 23-41. Oslo 1972. Supracrustal rocks metamorphosed to the sillimanite zone in the Pre cambrian of southern Norway are correlated with their lower-grade equiv alents in the Telemark Suite. Evidence for a regional unconformity, possibly marking the hiatus between the Bandak and Rjukan Groups, is presented and discussed. James H. Staut, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, U.S. A. Introduction The geology of the area immediately west of Fyresvatn (Fig. 1) was included by Dahll (1861) in one of the first reconnaissance maps of the Telemark area. Although at a scale of 1:400,000, the general distribution of rock types is accurately shown and has served, in part, as the basis for more recent compilations (Dons 1960). Werenskiold (1910) distinguished between the 'Telemark granites' and an overlying metasedimentary sequence now known as the Telemark Suite (Dons 1960, Fig. 1). Werenskiold's work represents one of the earliest attempts to establish a stratigraphy in the Precambrian of the Telemark area. Bugge (1931) was the first to divide the Telemark Suite into separate groups by defining the Seljord Quartzite and a supposedly underlying metasedimentary sequence he named the Bandak Formation. Wyckoff (1933) later worked in part with the oldest rocks recognized in the Telemark Suite now known as the Rjukan Group (Dons 1960). -
Nappekart 2012.Cdr
Bergen Mårbu E 39 Geilo 52 km E 16 9 Fjellvåken 7 35 13 49 Odda 40 Severdighet 4 Severdigheter 35 Oslo Tourist attraction Rjukan 22 48 E 134 Haukeli Attractions 37 Drammen Veinummer E 39 13 Rauland E 18 37 Notodden E 134 E 6 Road numbers 1 Heddal Stavkirke 46 40 38 45 E 134 Seljord 9 Haugesund 35 Mårvatn 2 32 Nasjonalparkruten Tuddal Bygdetun 45 36 40 Sarpsborg 32 Tønsberg The National Park 3 Setesdal Rudsgrend Skien 40 13 Sandefjord Route 38 4 Gaustabanen/Gaustatoppen Suleskarveien E 18 Larvik Stavanger (sommeråpent) Treungen 9 5 41 Kragerø Turisthytte Rjukan/Såheim 45 Staffed lodge E 39 6 Krossobanen 44 42 42 Stordalsbu Kalhovd 7 E 18 Vemork 42 42 Egersund Arendal 44 8 Rjukanfossen/Utsiktspunkt (viewpoint) 9 9 MB Fjellvåken/Høgfjellscruise E 39 Kristiansand 10 Skinnarbu utsiktspunkt (viewpoint) 7 d a Mogen v i d 1 1 Telemarkstunet e r Tinn Foto: Guro Lien Foto: Terje Rakke n g Kalhovdfjord 12 Rauland Kunstmuseum/Raulandutstillinga r d a Atrå H a Austbygd 13 Myllarheimen 1 Heddal Stavkirke 14 Utsiktspunkt Vågslid (viewpoint) 15 Mæl Stasjon Mæl T Stokofjell innsjø 1314 28 Helberghytta 4 5 15 24 37 Servering/ 25 3 Stavanger 182 km 6 27 29 2 Haugesund 157 km 20 Rjukan 5 overnattinger Bergen 229 km 8 6 26 Songavatn 30 Eat and Drink/ 7 Gaustatoppen 19 23 22 Møsvatn 21 1883 Accommodation 4 3 Haukeliseter Fliseggji 35 1630 34 1. Haukeli motell og Cafereria 1 2. Velemoen Camping 9 364 14 Skinnarbu 3. Urdbø fjellgrend Bitdalsvatn 18 9 8 37 10 4.