DOCSLIB.ORG

National Action Plan for Employment 2004 MALTA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Action Plan for Employment 2004 MALTA National Action Plan for Employment 2004 MALTA 28th September 2004 Contents Page Executive Summary i. Section A: The Context and the Three Objectives A.1 Overview 1. A,2 Full Employment 4. A,3 Quality and Productivity 6. A.4 Social Inclusion 7. A.5 Employment strategy, essential measures and targets for 2010 8. Section B: The Guidelines B.1 Guideline 1 11. B.2 Guideline 2 16. B.3 Guideline 3 23. B.4 Guideline 4 28. B.5 Guideline 5 36. B.6 Guideline 6 38. B.7 Guideline 7 44. B.8 Guideline 8 49. B.9 Guideline 9 52. B.10 Guideline 10 55. Section C: Governance and Partnership C.1 Preparing the 2004 NAP 59. C.2 Use of Structural Funds 60. Annexes: A: Core Committee and Consultees 61. B: List of acronyms 62. C: Summary of feedback received 63. Executive Summary This National Action Plan on Employment sets out the principal employment strategies for the years 2005 to 2010, as well as the key measures under each strategy for the year 2005. The National Action Plan is a national document, based on consultation within and beyond government. The issues that arise in this document, and the measures intended to address them, have been identified as important by key stakeholders in the labour market. They are intended to serve the needs of various groups – employers, employees, jobseekers and groups facing labour market barriers. It is important to be clear about the scope of the Plan. It is not a job creation strategy, but aims to bring about levels of efficiency, skill and inclusion that should allow jobs to be created, and taken up, with greater ease by all. The National Action Plan will henceforth be an annual process of consultation, reporting and evaluation. The actions described are tangible and modest in scope, based as they are on an annual timeframe. However, it is believed that this planning process will go some way towards meeting the felt need to articulate and co-ordinate labour market policies and to provide an enabling framework for the creation of more and better jobs. This is the first National Action Plan on Employment to be submitted under the European Employment Strategy by Malta as a new member state. The National Action Plan (NAPemp) is the key instrument of this Strategy, submitted every year in accordance with the employment objectives and guidelines adopted by the European Council. In its present form, the Employment Strategy consists of three over- arching objectives relating to full employment, quality and productivity at work, and an inclusive labour market. It also includes ten action-oriented employment guidelines, which form the structure of this Plan. These guidelines will remain stable until 2006. Henceforth, Malta will be submitting a NAPemp in the autumn of every year. The European Employment Strategy is based on the open method of co-ordination, where the efforts and outcomes of member states’ labour market policies are made visible through an annual cycle of planning, implementation and reporting. The NAPs submitted by member states are reviewed by the member states collectively, and by the European Commission, after their submission in the autumn. A Joint Employment Report is then drawn up, presenting an account of progress at the European level as well as by individual member states. After the Spring Council of the following year, the Council issues broad employment policy recommendations as well as recommendations for individual member states. The subsequent NAP is to take account of these recommendations in its reporting. The European Employment Strategy is an important instrument to reach the targets set at the Lisbon Council in 2000, and at subsequent Councils, by 2010. In the field of employment, these targets include improved employment rates for all, but particularly women and older workers; improved participation in education and training; and the provision of childcare for children under three. This first NAP responds to these objectives and targets. In doing so, it takes into account the priorities i. agreed to on the signing of the Joint Assessment Paper of the Employment Policy Priorities of Malta in October 2001; the recommendations of the Employment Task Force in 2003; the Council Decision on guidelines for Member States’ Employment Policies for 2005, as well as the priorities highlighted for Malta for the same period. The NAPemp is structured in three main sections, in accordance with the template established by the European Commission. In Section A, a brief account is provided of the economic context of the Plan; an overview of progress towards the three overarching objectives; and employment forecasts based on the Labour Force Survey. This Section also describes the six strategic elements to be pursued between 2005 and 2010which reflect Malta’s employment policy priorities. These elements include: improving the levels of education and certification among the workforce; raising the national employment rate; enhancing the business environment; increasing productivity in the public sector; modernising the public employment service; and improving the governance of labour market policies. In Section B, these six strategies are broken down further within ten sections, which respond to each of the guidelines. Each section sets out the institutional infrastructure for each guideline; followed by a brief analysis of the strengths and weaknesses with respect to each guideline; key data; and the measures that are being taken, and that will be taken within the timeframe of this Plan. Furthermore, based on forecasts deriving from the Labour Force Survey and the anticipated impact of current and planned measures, quantitative targets are provided to account for how Malta may be expected to approach the Lisbon targets for 2010. In Section C, an account is given of the governance structure for the Plan, and of the drafting and consultation process that was followed. In essence, the Plan provides for a total of eighty one initiatives that will contribute to the development of the Maltese labour market, a number of which are novel and which have been stimulated through the consultation process in preparing this Plan. These include thirty projects that have been approved for funding under the European Social Fund (ESF) between 2004 and 2006. These projects aim to promote employability and adaptability; gender equality; lifelong learning and social inclusion; human resources development in Gozo; and to provide for ESF technical assistance. Total expenditure on ESF projects is expected to amount to EUR12.16 million, which will be jointly funded by the Maltese Government and the European Union. In addition, projects have also been approved for funding under the European Regional Development Fund, which will allow for infrastructural developments to support the broad aims of the ESF. In parallel to the implementation of these measures, the institutional capacity of government and the social partners to define, co-ordinate and evaluate employment policy will be further strengthened. In particular, co-ordination will be strengthened with regard to ensuring coherence between the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines and the National Action Plan on Social Inclusion. ii. This Plan was developed by a Core Committee chaired by the Minister responsible for employment. The Committee met on a regular basis as from February 2004, to review and develop draft chapters of the document as prepared by the drafting team within the Employment and Training Corporation. In parallel, key stakeholders were consulted as to their perceptions of the key issues surrounding each guideline, and any measures they have taken or planned in this regard. A first draft document was submitted to Cabinet for approval to enter this current phase of consultation. Approval was given in July 2004, followed by consultation in August and September 2004. A final draft was drawn up and submitted to the European Commission on the 1st October 2004 together with an appendix summarising consultee feedback. The document will also be reviewed by the Permanent Parliamentary Committee on Social Affairs by the end of November 2004. It is to be noted that this Plan is one amongst other key documents aimed at securing sustainable social and economic development in Malta. Government is, at present, going through the process of bringing about a number of changes towards this end. These include the Convergence Programme, reforms in the Pensions and Health sectors, a National Action Plan for Social Inclusion, and a Lifelong Learning Strategy among others. Work is also underway towards the development of a comprehensive Social Pact. iii. A: The National Context and Progress towards the Objectives In the 2000 Lisbon European Council, EU Member States established an ambitious long-term objective of strengthening the Union’s competitiveness and encouraging employment and sustainable growth by closely co-ordinating economic policy, employment policy and social policy. The Guidelines and Recommendations of the European Employment Strategy (EES) represent a vital instrument for attaining the goals set in the Lisbon Strategy. The Council of the European Union adopts Employment Guidelines in line with the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPGs). In 2003, the EES was reviewed with the aim of providing a stronger focus on the Lisbon targets in the employment fields. Full employment, improving job quality and productivity at work, and greater social cohesion and inclusion became the overarching objectives. Moreover, the new European Employment Strategy contains ten specific guidelines upon which this Plan is structured. Malta, like all new Member States, was called to submit a National Action Plan for Employment (NAPemp) for the first time in 2004 This followed on the signing of the Joint Assessment Paper of the Employment Policy Priorities of Malta, co-signed by the European Commission and the Government of Malta in October 2001. This NAPemp was structured according to the ten guidelines and the overarching objectives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia
    TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • Pangs of Nascent Nationalism from the Nationless State?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OAR@UM Nations and Nationalism 15 (1), 2009, 148–165. Pangsofnascentnationalismfromthe nationless state? Euro coins and undocumented migrants in Malta since 2004n GODFREY BALDACCHINO University of Prince Edward Island, Canada and Visiting Professor, University of Malta, Malta ABSTRACT. This paper examines recent manifestations of the emergence of national identity amongst the citizens of Malta, now the smallest member state of the European Union. In this search, discrete events and ‘things’ are examined as symbolic para- phernalia, empirical phenomena that provide insights to overarching narratives about identity, nationalism and integration. The discussion and eventual decision on the choice of euro coin faces in Malta is proposed as one that illustrates a process of ‘nascent nationalism’. Meanwhile, the arrival of boatloads of undocumented migrants on Malta’s shores has also encouraged the evolution of a secular, national character in Malta. Such episodes, and others, ultimately reflect a need for symbols of national unity that remain largely absent in this ‘nationless state’ which continues to be gripped by a bipolar partisanship that spares almost no one. KEYWORDS: euro coins; European Union; Malta; nationalism; nationless state; undocumented migrants Scene-setting: there are two sides to the coin The choice of stylised bridges to grace the reverse side of the euro notes, now the currency of 400 million Europeans, should not surprise us. The European Union (EU) is a grand project which speaks ambitiously to both integration n An earlier draft of this paper was prepared for a workshop titled: ‘EU–Civil Society Relations: The Impact of the EU on National Movements and National Identity’, organised by the Department of Politics at the University of Strathclyde and held at Ross Priory, Loch Lomond, Scotland, on 23–25 April 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • OGP NAP2 Malta Rev2
    Open Government Partnership 2nd National Action Plan MALTA 2015-2017 1. Introduction The Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a global effort to make governments better and more accountable. It aims to make governments more transparent, effective and accountable – with citizens that are empowered and institutions that are responsive to their demands and dreams. To further these initiatives is not easy and requires political leadership and political will in conjunction with technical knowledge. To implement these policies requires investment and sustained effort, and a dialogue of collaboration between governments and civil society. The government of Malta is committed to OGP as the principles of promoting transparency, empowering citizens, fighting corruption and harnessing new technologies are all in line with government’s views and policies. This commitment was formalised by the signing of the OGP in July 2011. Furthermore, Malta submitted its’ first National Action Plan (NAP) in June 2012 for the period 2012-2014. The first NAP focused on two grand challenges, namely: ‘Creating Safer Communities’ and ‘Increasing Corporate Accountability’. The second section of this action plan provides an update regarding the implementation of the first action plan. The second NAP will focus on the following grand challenges, ‘Improving Public Services’ and ‘Increasing Public Integrity’. The two grand challenges were chosen in collaboration with civil society. Improving Public Services 1. Participation of Women in the Public Service Over the past years, labour market participation of women in Malta, has improved but still remains considerably below EU average. The female participation rate in the labour market is one of the key challenges listed by the European Union (EU) in Malta’s Country-Specific Recommendations for 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Greening Our Economy –Achieving a Sustainable
    GREENING OUR ECONOMY – ACHIEVING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE MINISTRY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, THE ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE (MSDEC) PREAMBLE Economic growth patterns, growing populations, and current production and consumption patterns reliant on finite resources have adversely affected the environment, to the extent that a ‘business-as-usual’ approach, revolving around unsustainable practices, is no longer an option. The environment and the economy are explicitly linked and can no longer be considered in isolation from one another. It is time for a strategic vision, incorporating policies that are congruent with economic efficiency, environmental integrity and social equity, as well as coherent both at a national and an international level1. The Green Economy is thus to be resorted to as a new source of growth; as a means to accelerate progress towards sustainable development and poverty reduction. Moreover, as indicated in Malta’s National Reform Programme, not only does the Green Economy create jobs and monetary trade, but it also has the potential of improving well- being as a result of a symbiotic relationship between ‘economic growth’ and ‘environmental stewardship’. In this way, better jobs and increased revenue would be managed so as to directly and indirectly contribute towards a cleaner environment, in the interests of the present and future generations. ‘Malta’s commitment to the shift to a green economy is expressed in my Government’s programme of work, through the implementation of a strategy based on best practices that put the environment at the core of decisions made while aiming to achieve economic growth that gives due consideration to sustainable development.2’ – Prime Minister Dr Joseph Muscat It follows that, this clear policy direction is in the process of being translated into concrete action, which must be characterised by substantially increased investments in economic sectors that build on and enhance the earth’s natural capital or reduce ecological scarcities and environmental risks.
    [Show full text]
  • National Action Plan for Malta for the Reduction and Elimination of Land Based Pollution
    National Action Plan for Malta for the Reduction and Elimination of Land Based Pollution (In the framework of the implementation of the Strategic Action Programme to address pollution from land-based activities) National Diagnostic Analysis for Malta Victor Axiak As submitted to The United Nations Environment Programme, Coordinating Unit for the Mediterranean Action Plan Through The Environment Protection Directorate of the Malta Environment and Planning Authority. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................3 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 National Programmes Addressing Marine Pollution ............................................ 4 1.2.1 Coastal Zone Management in Malta..............................................................................................................4 1.2.2 Institutional Framework ..................................................................................................................................5 1.2.3 Information and monitoring of the marine environment .................................................................................7 1.3 Legal Framework for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Pollution in Malta................................................................................................ 10 1.3.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS III 1990-2012
    Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET III 1990-2012 Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012 is a collection of political and institutional data. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for a group of 36 OECD and/or EU- member countries for the period 1990-20121. The data are primarily from the data set created at the University of Berne, Institute of Political Science and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation: The Comparative Political Data Set I (CPDS I). However, the present data set differs in several aspects from the CPDS I dataset. Compared to CPDS I Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus (Greek part), Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia have been added. The present data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time series analyses. The data set contains some additional demographic, socio- and economic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD. For trade union membership, excellent data for European trade unions is provided by Jelle Visser (2013). When using the data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. This data set is to be cited as: Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler. 2014. Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Last updated: 2014-09-30 1 Data for former communist countries begin in 1990 for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Lativa and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.6.2020 SWD
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.6.2020 SWD(2020) 113 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee Report on the 2019 elections to the European Parliament {COM(2020) 252 final} EN EN Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Participation in the elections ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1. The strongest turnout in a generation .................................................................................... 3 2.1.1. Communication and citizens’ mobilisation ahead of the elections ...................................... 6 2.2. Participation of specific groups ............................................................................................... 9 2.2.1. EU citizens residing in a Member State other than their own ........................................ 9 2.2.2. By age group ................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.3. Gender .......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.4. Other underrepresented groups ................................................................................... 18 2.3. Funding of projects supporting the enjoyment
    [Show full text]
  • C 375 Gazzetta Ufficiale
    Gazzetta ufficiale C 375 dell'Unione europea 57o anno Edizione in lingua italiana Comunicazioni e informazioni 22 ottobre 2014 Sommario IV Informazioni INFORMAZIONI PROVENIENTI DALLE ISTITUZIONI, DAGLI ORGANI E DAGLI ORGANISMI DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA Parlamento europeo INTERROGAZIONI SCRITTE CON RISPOSTA 2014/C 375/01 Interrogazioni scritte presentate dai deputati al Parlamento europeo e relative risposte date da un’Istituzione dell’Unione europea.......................................................................................................................... 1 (Cfr. nota per il lettore) IT Nota per il lettore Questa pubblicazione contiene interrogazioni scritte presentate dai deputati al Parlamento europeo e le relative risposte date da un'istituzione dell’Unione europea. Per ciascuna interrogazione e risposta, la versione nella lingua originale è presentata prima di un’eventuale traduzione. In alcuni casi è possibile che la risposta sia redatta in una lingua diversa da quella dell’interrogazione: questo dipende dalla lingua di lavoro della commissione che deve fornire la risposta. Queste interrogazioni e risposte sono pubblicate in conformità degli articoli 117 e 118 del regolamento del Parlamento europeo. Tutte le interrogazioni e le relative risposte sono accessibili attraverso il sito web del Parlamento europeo (Europarl) alla rubrica «Interrogazioni parlamentari»: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/it/parliamentary-questions.html SIGNIFICATO DELLE ABBREVIAZIONI DEI GRUPPI POLITICI PPE gruppo del Partito popolare europeo (Democratico
    [Show full text]
  • Public Funding Solutions for Political Parties in Muslim-Majority Societies
    Public Funding Solutions for Political Parties in Muslim-Majority Societies Writers Marcin Walecki Kevin Casas-Zamora Omer Genckaya Dina Ammar Chantal Sarkis-Hanna Karma Ekmekji-Boladian Elobaid Ahmed Elobaid. Public Funding Solutions for Political Parties in Muslim-Majority Societies Copyright © IFES. All rights reserved. IFES 1101 15th Street, NW Ste. 300 Washington, D.C. U.S.A. Notice of rights All rights reserved. No part of this report can be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 1-931459-34-7 P a g e | 1 Table of Contents Foreword .......................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .......................................................................... 4 Biographies ....................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ........................................................................... 7 Introduction .................................................................................... 10 Dr. Kevin Casas-Zamora Part I Public Funding in Established and Transitional Democracies ......... 25 Dr. Marcin Walecki Part II Public Funding of Political Parties: ................................................. 39 The Case of Turkey Omer Faruk Genckaya Public Funding of Political Parties: .................................................. 50 The Case of Egypt Dina Ammar Public Funding for Political Parties: ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Party Organizational Strength in New and Old Democracies
    Revista do CESOP http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912019251199 e-ISSN 1807-0191 Time after time: party organizational strength in new and old democracies Pedro Floriano Ribeiro1 Luis Locatelli2 The ‘time factor’ has not been systematically considered in cross-national studies on party organizations. Relying on the largest dataset to date on party organizations, namely the Political Party Database Project (PPDB), the article tests the impact of time as a two-level variable (duration of democracy and age of parties) on parties’ organizational strength in new and established democracies. We add original data from three Latin American countries to the nineteen countries covered by the first PPDB database (132 parties overall). The results suggest that parties in established democracies have less members and more money than those of newer democracies. Among the latter, the greater capacity for mass mobilization produces stronger parties—as in Latin America—compared to the Eastern European countries. The findings challenge the traditional view of the exceptional weakness of Latin American parties and point to the importance of time as a multilevel variable: besides the national context, the “ancestral” party origin in previous regimes have a large impact on organizational strength. Keywords: party organizations; political parties; party membership; party finance; Latin America Introduction3 Many studies in political science consider time as a relevant factor in the explanation of political processes, implicitly or explicitly, when adopting historical approaches. However, a few authors have systematically placed “politics in time” (Pierson, 2004). In this sense, the influence of time as a multilevel variable—duration of democracy and age of parties—on party membership, party funding, and organizational strength has not been systematically tested until today in cross-national comparative studies.
    [Show full text]