ANTI-CORRUPTION in SOUTHEAST EUROPE: FIRST STEPS and POLICIES the Southeast European Legal Development Initiative (SELDI) Was Launched in Late 1998

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANTI-CORRUPTION in SOUTHEAST EUROPE: FIRST STEPS and POLICIES the Southeast European Legal Development Initiative (SELDI) Was Launched in Late 1998 S O U T H E A S T E U R O P E A N LE G AL D E V E L O P M E N T I N I T I A T I V E w w w . s e l d i . n e t ANTI-CORRUPTION IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE: FIRST STEPS AND POLICIES The Southeast European Legal Development Initiative (SELDI) was launched in late 1998. It was initi- ated by the Center for the Study of Democracy and the International Legal Development Organization, Rome. The Southeast European Legal Development Initiative brings together the efforts of various gov- ernment organizations and experts from different countries of Southeast Europe. It creates opportuni- ties for cooperation between the most active public institutions and public figures, the governments, and international agencies in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia, Romania, and Yugoslavia. ISBN 954-477-103-4 © 2002 Center for the Study of Democracy All rights reserved. 5 Alexander Zhendov Str., 1113 Sofia phone: (+359 2) 971 3000, fax: (+359 2) 971 2233 www.csd.bg, [email protected] CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 5 II. THE BACKGROUND: ORIGINS OF TRANS-BORDER CRIME AND CORRUPTION IN SEE 11 III. REGULATORY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ANTI-CORRUPTION 27 IV. INSTITUTIONAL PREREQUISITES FOR ANTI-CORRUPTION 51 V. JUDICIAL REFORM 93 VI. CORRUPTION IN THE ECONOMY 115 VII. CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE MEDIA 147 VIII. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 165 3 Acknowledgements The Southeast European Legal Development Initiative (SELDI) would like to thank the following per- sons and institutions for contributing to the development of this report: Auron Pasha, Institute for Development Research and Alternatives (IDRA), Tirana, Albania Elton Babameto, Institute for Development Research and Alternatives (IDRA), Tirana, Albania Boris Begovic, Center for Liberal Democratic Studies, Belgrade, Yugoslavia Lazar Antonic, Center for Liberal Democratic Studies, Belgrade, Yugoslavia Boris Divjak, Transparency International, Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, BiH Danijela Vidovic, Transparency International, Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, BiH Dragan Tumanovski, Supreme Court of Macedonia, Skopje, Macedonia Ioana Veghes, The Gallup Organization Romania Ltd., Bucharest, Romania Ivana Aleksic, Center for Policy Studies, Belgrade, Yugoslavia Kreshnik Spahiu, Albanian Center for Economic Research (ACER), Tirana, Albania Mura Palasek, Agency Puls, Zagreb, Croatia Predrag Bejakovic, Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb, Croatia Sorin Ionita, Romanian Academic Society (SAR), Bucharest, Romania Sterjo Zikov, Public Prosecutorsí Office, Skopje, Macedonia Vanja Mihajlova, Consultant, Skopje, Macedonia Zef Preci, Albanian Center for Economic Research (ACER), Tirana, Albania Zoran Jacev, Center for Strategic Research and Documentation FORUM, Skopje, Macedonia Editors / Contributors Alexander Stoyanov, Director of Research, Center for the Study of Democracy Boyko Todorov, Program Director, Center for the Study of Democracy Emil Tsenkov, Senior Fellow, Center for the Study of Democracy Maria Yordanova, Director, Law Program, Center for the Study of Democracy Marko Hajdinjak, Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Democracy Ognian Shentov, Chairman, Center for the Study of Democracy 4 I. INTRODUCTION Corruption has become a major issue, particular- sectors constituted fertile ground for both ly in the countries of transition. It has become an petty and large-scale corrupt practices. accompanying phenomenon of the transition from state-socialism to market capitalism and These features, which originate in the recent past, democracy in Southeast Europe (SEE). The com- however, cannot alone explain the extraordinary mon problems that post-communist societies scale of corrupt transactions in the new Balkan face contribute to this fact significantly, but there democracies. The process of transition of state- are also a number of characteristics specific to the owned economy into private ownership through countries in SEE: privatization, in addition to the restitution of prop- erty, created huge opportunities for the misuse of Public sector operations are non-transparent, public power at the expense of the public. performance is poor and distrust of the citi- Another often ignored sphere of systemic corrup- zens towards public officials is high. tion is the de-facto privatization of cross-bor- der transactions through bribing state officials The collapse of the Communist regimes left at the customs, border police and other regulato- behind an over-extended public sector and ry and law-enforcement bodies. Given the open high expectations in the population that it will nature of the Balkan economies, cross-border receive assistance in all walks of life (a “pre- transactions constitute up to 2/3 of the GDP for mature welfare state”, as it was called) any single country, hence they generate even more dirty money, then privatization itself. The combination of weakness, lack of trans- parency and overburdening in the SEE public Table 1: Main problems in the countries of SEE Albania Bosnia and Bulgaria Macedonia Romania Croatia Serbia Montenegro Herzegovina 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 Unemployment 44.4 44.8 60.9 60.9 67.8 68.9 75.3 58.2 39.5 33.9 66.0 78.5 30.3 38.0 53.1 51.1 Low incomes 39.3 40.8 39.6 39.3 49.0 47.0 62.0 26.7 41.3 49.4 39.1 44.2 39.2 33.6 35.6 37.2 Poverty 24.4 28.2 29.8 31.9 41.5 42.7 1.1 43.9 50.6 57.4 31.6 28.7 39.7 44.4 34.8 43.4 Corruption 60.8 68.4 47.6 48.3 37.5 35.1 35.1 31.2 59.9 59.9 41.7 41.1 37.2 37.3 30.8 35.9 Crime 36.0 24.6 32.9 32.8 25.7 32.9 27.6 23.9 10.2 12.5 33.5 30.4 44.1 41.4 31.5 30.1 High prices 24.0 23.3 10.9 13.9 22.4 20.9 25.4 7.8 35.6 35.6 27.3 18.4 24.7 24.0 21.2 17.7 Health Care 3.7 2.3 9.9 9.5 14.0 17.2 7.2 1.7 17.4 15.4 7.1 8.9 8.7 9.8 4.0 2.0 Political instability 49.6 46.0 37.0 33.9 17.0 13.1 33.2 55.9 29.9 11.6 20.1 28.7 47.8 35.3 59.3 57.7 Education 3.9 3.2 4.6 4.8 2.1 1.8 3.7 0.8 7.9 8.8 4.4 4.1 6.3 7.8 4.5 3.9 Environment pollution 5.2 3.6 3.8 3.1 2.7 1.5 6.0 1.0 1.6 3.2 2.8 3.5 2.5 5.6 4.8 2.7 Ethnic problems 3.0 2.415.6 17.1 1.7 1.414.940.7 2.4 1.6 7.0 3.6 10.2 8.2 8.6 5.2 Other 0.9 4.4 1.8 1.3 1.9 4.5 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.1 3.1 0.6 1.8 1.5 3.0 DK/NA 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.7 1.6 0.5 3.0 1.2 0.2 2.7 1.6 1.7 1.1 1.9 1.8 0.3 Source: SELDI Corruption Monitoring System. Scores close to 1 correspond to low spread of corruption, those close to 10 to high- est degree of proliferation.(For further details see http://www.seldi.net/indexes.htm) 5 In most of the SEE countries, state institutions to corruption in SEE. Several factors warrant this were subordinated to private interests in the first approach. stage of the transition in the early 1990s. The sym- biosis between the state and “high-risk” busi- The first one relates to the scale of the problem of nesses under unclear rules of the game and a corruption in these countries. Societies in SEE are paralysis of the judiciary bred systemic corrup- faced with a corruption culture that permeates all tion within society. structures of the body politic and which became a systemic feature of their political structures. The In addition, other types of misuse occured: clien- spread of corruption throughout the whole spec- telism, nepotism, and a secondary symbiosis of trum of possible forms – from the usual bakshish the state and businesses. In this case, state inter- to the traffic police to the entry of organized crime ference in business affairs is much greater than into the mainstream economies through corrupt the opposite trend – ”buying of politicians” by privatization practices - presents a challenge that strong private-economic power-groups. In this goes beyond the effectiveness of traditional anti- case, some throwbacks to the past occur, which corruption tools. The systemic nature of corrup- make possible state/party interference in the tion in SEE has become the major factor imped- economy despite the privatization of state-owned ing their development efforts. It has distorted the property. In situations like these, the opposition restructuring of their economies, the moderniza- blames the ruling party for imposing neo-author- tion of their education systems and public health itarian forms of government that favor private care, and has affected many social programs (e.g. interests close to those in power. public housing). All this has had a negative impact on the public’s trust in the emerging dem- Understandably, it is grand - political and sys- ocratic and market economy institutions and has temic - rather than administrative or petty corrup- bred disillusionment with reforms in general. tion, which is the main target of anti-corruption efforts by civil society; and public reforms, rather The second relevant aspect relates to the factors then purely preventive measures are needed facilitating the corruption on such a scale.
Recommended publications
  • Lebanese American University
    Lebanese American University The Power of Silence: Impunity and Accountability in Lebanon By Michelle Bouchebel Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Affairs School of Arts and Sciences May 2014 © 2014 Michelle Bouchebel All Rights Reserved ii iii iv To my beloved father, mother and brothers v AKNOWLEDGMENTS This research would not have been possible without the help and assistance of many people. First, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Walid Moubarak who devotedly guided me throughout the whole process of producing this thesis. I am also very grateful to Dr. Marwan Rowayheb and Dr. Makram Ouaiss for being members of my thesis committee. Thanks also goes to the Lebanese American University for all the support this institution offered me throughout my graduate studies, Finally, special thanks go to Martti Antola, Christalla Yakinthou, my family and my friends who were always there for me throughout this process and offered motivation and support. vi The Power of Silence: Impunity and Accountability in Lebanon Michelle M. Bouchebel ABSTRACT The Power of Silence: Impunity and Accountability in Lebanon by Michelle Bouchebel explores the extent to which transitional justice mechanisms could help to strengthen accountability and the rule of law in Lebanon and suggests several options for the kinds of transitional justice mechanisms that could be explored, taking into account the current political context of the country. The study draws on, and seeks to contribute to, literature on transitional justice as well as literature on the Lebanese civil war and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption As an Obstacle for Doing Business in the Western Balkans: a Business Sector Perspective
    Jelena Budak and Edo Rajh Corruption as an Obstacle for Doing Business in the Western Balkans: A Business Sector Perspective Prosinac. December 2011 . Radni materijali EIZ-a EIZ Working Papers ekonomski institut, zagreb Br No. EIZ-WP-1104 Radni materijali EIZ-a EIZ Working Papers EIZ-WP-1104 Corruption as an Obstacle for Doing Business in the Western Balkans: A Business Sector Perspective Jelena Budak Senior Research Associate The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Trg J. F. Kennedyja 7 10000 Zagreb, Croatia T. 385 1 2362 228 F. 385 1 2335 165 E. [email protected] Edo Rajh Senior Research Associate The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Trg J. F. Kennedyja 7 10000 Zagreb, Croatia T. 385 1 2362 298 F. 385 1 2335 165 E. [email protected] www.eizg.hr Zagreb, December 2011 IZDAVAÈ / PUBLISHER: Ekonomski institut, Zagreb / The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Trg J. F. Kennedyja 7 10000 Zagreb Croatia T. 385 1 2362 200 F. 385 1 2335 165 E. [email protected] www.eizg.hr ZA IZDAVAÈA / FOR THE PUBLISHER: Sandra Švaljek, ravnateljica / director GLAVNA UREDNICA / EDITOR: eljka Kordej-De Villa UREDNIŠTVO / EDITORIAL BOARD: Ivan-Damir Aniæ Valerija Botriæ Edo Rajh Paul Stubbs IZVRŠNI UREDNIK / EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Josip Šipiæ TEHNIÈKI UREDNIK / TECHNICAL EDITOR: Vladimir Sukser Tiskano u 80 primjeraka Printed in 80 copies ISSN 1846-4238 e-ISSN 1847-7844 Stavovi izraeni u radovima u ovoj seriji publikacija stavovi su autora i nuno ne odraavaju stavove Ekonomskog instituta, Zagreb. Radovi se objavljuju s ciljem poticanja rasprave i kritièkih komentara kojima æe se unaprijediti buduæe verzije rada. Autor(i) u potpunosti zadravaju autorska prava nad èlancima objavljenim u ovoj seriji publikacija.
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2018 Country Report — Serbia
    BTI 2018 Country Report Serbia This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Serbia. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | Serbia 3 Key Indicators Population M 7.1 HDI 0.776 GDP p.c., PPP $ 14512 Pop. growth1 % p.a. -0.5 HDI rank of 188 66 Gini Index 29.1 Life expectancy years 75.5 UN Education Index 0.779 Poverty3 % 1.4 Urban population % 55.7 Gender inequality2 0.185 Aid per capita $ 44.0 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Serbia’s current political system is characterized by the dominant rule of one political party at the national and provincial level, as well as most of the local government units.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Conferences on Organised Crime at the Bundeskriminalamt In
    Corruption and Organised Crime Threats in Southern Eastern Europe Ugljesa Zvekic Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime 1 Organised Crime and Corruption in the Global Developmental Perspective In this article the emphasis was on a nearly inherent link between organised crime and corruption on a local as well as transnational level. Wherever there is ground prone to corruption, there is also a favourable ground for organised crime; and vice versa. Much of the prone ground for organised corruption is established through firstly a low corruption level which then accelerates to a more sophisticated level of corruption, in particular when linked to organised crime. Furthermore, it was professed that today more intricate activities in or- ganised crime can be linked to more intricate activities in corruption, making them mutually instrumental. Historically speaking, two contradictory trends were identified: Firstly a de- cline in violent crimes over the past century and decades, and secondly an in- crease in global organised crime and corruption, which in turn promoted more international legal responses and cooperation. (Pinker, Mack 2014/ 2015) The phenomenon of organised crime is not new to the global crime trends but the scale and scope have shifted vigorously. Change is also pre- sents in new forms and methods of legitimizing illicitly gained profit. The im- pact comes to light in the form of shifts in major illicit markets, an expansion of new criminal markets as well as a blurring of traditional producer, consu- mer and transit state typologies. Therefore, organised crime and corruption both have broader implications than defined within the traditional security and justice framework; hence they are now recognised as cross-cutting threats to a sustainable development which is also pictured by the 16th goal of the Sustainable Development Goals1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Culture : Breaking New Ground in Corruption Research
    SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH PROJECT: CRIME AND CULTURE Crime as a Cultural Problem. The Relevance of Perceptions of Corruption to Crime Prevention. A Comparative Cultural Study in the EU-Accession States Bulgaria and Romania, the EU-Candidate States Turkey and Croatia and the EU-States Germany, Greece and United Kingdom Dirk Tänzler Konstadinos Maras Angelos Giannakopoulos Crime and Culture Breaking New Ground in Corruption Research Discussion Paper Series No 1 2007 2 Dr. Dirk Tänzler is currently visiting Professor at the University of Zurich 2007, Assistant Professor at the University of Konstanz and Co-ordinator of the EU-Research-Consortium ‘Crime and Culture’ 2006-2008. He was Visiting Professor at Vienna University 2005, 2006, Visiting Lecturer at the University of Luzern 2005-2008, Zeppelin University, Friedrichs- hafen 2006, University of Salzburg 2005, Humboldt University of Berlin 1995, 1996. Director of the Sozialwissenschaftliches Archiv Konstanz (“Alfred-Schütz-Gedächtnis-Archiv)/ Zentralarchiv der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2000-2005, Research Fellow at the University of Konstanz 1999-2000, Research Fellow at the Science Centre Berlin for Social Research (WZB) 1993-1997, Research Fellow at the Institute for Economic Culture at Boston University 1991-1992. He earned his postdoctoral degree (Habilitation) at the University of Konstanz 2005 and his Ph.D. at J.-W. Goethe University of Frankfurt a.M. 1990. His special research and teaching interests are Sociological Theory, Social Philosophy, History of Sociology, Sociology of Knowledge, Sociology of Culture, Political Sociology, Qualitative Methods, Hermeneutics, Media Analysis, Visual Sociology. Dr. Dr. Konstadinos Maras is Lecturer at the University of Tübingen, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Institute of Art History and research assistant at the “European Centre for Scientific, Ecumenical and Cultural Co-operation”, Würzburg, responsible for documentation and research on the European and International Philhellenism.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Serbia: [email protected]
    U4 Helpdesk Answer U4 Helpdesk Answer 2020 17 April 2020 AUTHOR Overview of corruption and Nieves Zúñiga (TI) anti-corruption in Serbia: [email protected] Changes in the last 10 years REVIEWED BY Guillaume Nicaise (U4) The evolution of corruption and anti-corruption in Serbia has [email protected] followed the transition from a fragile government led by the Democratic Party to an increasingly centralised and authoritarian Transparency Serbia regime led by the Serbian Progressive Party. Even if there is no [email protected] evidence of a significant change in the level of corruption, corruption in the Balkan country shapes political dynamics, resulting in the capture of political decision making and the political control of independent institutions, the judiciary and the legislature. The progress made in anti-corruption has been more RELATED U4 MATERIAL on paper than in practice, with the implementation of those Western Balkans and Turkey: reforms being the main challenge. Overview of Corruption and Anti- Corruption Corruption and doing business in Serbia Helpdesk Answers are tailor-made research briefings compiled in ten working days. The U4 Helpdesk is a free research service run in collaboration with Transparency International. Query How has corruption evolved in the past 10 years in Serbia? To what extent is corruption connected to political dynamics and social norms? Give an overview of anti-corruption initiatives in Serbia. Contents MAIN POINTS — In the last ten years there has not been a 1. Introduction significant change in the level of corruption 2. Evolution of corruption in the last 10 years in Serbia. a. Extent of corruption b.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticorruption Policy in Croatia: Benchmark for Eu
    1 Damir Grubiša Anti-Corruption Policy in Croatia: a Benchmark for EU Accession In 1998, the European Commission concluded in its evaluation of the central and east European countries' requests for EU membership in the context of the preparation for Agenda 2000 that the fight against political corruption in these countries needed to be upgraded. The Commission's report on the progress of each candidate country can be summed up as follows: "The efforts undertaken by candidate countries are not always adequate to the entity of the problem itself. Although some of these countries initiate new programmes for the control and prevention of corruption, it is too early for a judgment on the efficiency of such measures. A lack of determination can be seen in confronting this problem and in rooting out corruption in the greatest part of the candidate countries". Similar evaluations were repeated in subsequent reports on the progress of candidate countries from central and east Europe. Accordingly, it was concluded in 2001 that political corruption is a serious problem in five out of ten countries of that region: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Slovakia, and a constant problem in three more countries: Hungary, Lithuania and Latvia. The Commission refrained from expressing critical remarks only in the case of two countries – Estonia and Slovenia. Up to 2002, only eight out of fifteen member states ratified the basic instrument that the EU had adopted against corruption, namely the EU Convention on the Safeguarding of Economic Interests of the European Communities. Some of the founding members of the European Community were rated as countries with a "high level of corruption" – Germany, France and, specifically, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution of Corruption”
    ACN Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central National Anticorruption Directorate, Asia Romania OECD Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia EXPERT SEMINAR “EFFECTIVE MEANS OF INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF CORRUPTION” Held in Bucharest, Romania on 20 – 22 October 2010 Hosted by the National Anti-Corruption Directorate of Romania PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEMINAR These proceedings were prepared by the Secretariat of the Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ACN) at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD does not guarantee the accuracy of data included in the presentations and accept no responsibility for any consequences of their use. This document is available for download from the ACN Web site at www.oecd.org/corruption/acn Participants in the expert seminar “Effective Means of Investigation and Prosecution of Corruption”, 20 – 22 October 2010, Bucharest, Romania 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 5 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS ............................................................................................................... 7 TOPIC 1 EFFECTIVE MEANS TO DETECT AND INVESTIGATE CORRUPTION CRIMES .......................... 12 MEANS OF DETECTING AND INVESTIGATING CORRUPTION OFFENCES AND JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS (Juuso Oilinki, Finland) ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Corruption Research Paper by RAND Europe
    The Cost of Non- Europe in the area of Organised Crime and Corruption Annex II - Corruption STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service European Added Value Unit PE 579.319 - March 2016 The Cost of Non-Europe in the area of Organised Crime and Corruption Annex II- The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Corruption Research paper by RAND Europe On 7 September 2015, the Coordinators of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) requested the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) to prepare a 'Cost of Non Europe Report' on Organised Crime and Corruption to support work on the own-initiative report on the fight against corruption and follow-up of the CRIM committee resolution (2015/2110 (INI), Rapporteur Laura Ferrara (EFDD, IT)). In response to this request, a general assessment1, bringing together the research findings of three studies commissioned from outside experts, has been drawn up by the European Added Value Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value within DG EPRS. Its aim is to help improve understanding of the subject matter by providing evidence of the specific benefits that could be achieved through European action to fight organised crime and corruption. The three studies commissioned from outside experts are published as separate documents: - RAND Europe, research paper on the costs of non-Europe in the area of corruption (PE 579.319); - Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) & Economisti Associati srl, research paper on the costs of non-Europe in the area of organised crime (PE 579.318); and - -Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRUPTION and SECURITY “Fighting Dragons Is What Heroes Do“ 2 Welcome Word Credits
    Empowering Professionals ISSUE X, MARCH 2016 the magazine1 IACAIssue X, March 2016 LUMNUS EUROPEAN UNION SUPPORT INSTRUMENTS IN THE FIELD OF ANTI-CORRUPTION By Gerhard Levy INTEGRITY COMMITTEES By Lucky Kabondo Muntanga Interview with Sarah Chayes CORRUPTION AND SECURITY “Fighting draGONS IS WHAt heroes do“ 2 Welcome Word CREDITS Dear alumni, IACAlumnus - the magazine is the alumni magazine of the International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA), addressing alumni around the world who have participated, or are Sarah Chayes, author of the book Thieves of currently taking part in trainings designed State and the subject of our cover story, says and implemented by IACA. anti-corruption professionals are the greatest public servants of all. “They may sometimes IACAlumnus - the magazine welcomes contributions by feel like they’re fighting a dragon, but alumni. As a forum to exchange ideas and latest developments, and feature the career paths of our alumni, we fighting dragons is what heroes do,” is her seek to provide you with a medium to stay connected. For message for those of you reflecting on your contributions please contact [email protected]. difficult and sometimes dangerous work in this field. IACA reserves the right to select and edit any contribution to suit the publication. We will not consider contributions that have already been published, in any form, in print or online. Sarah was the keynote speaker at a side- event during IACA’s fourth Assembly of EDITORIAL Parties in Vienna in December 2015. In a Richard Eames special interview with IACAlumnus for our DESIGN first issue of 2016, she talks about the Adrian Ciupagea reaction to her book, reframing the corruption issue, and finding the vulnerable PHOTOGRAPHS points of corrupt networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Curbing Corruption: Ideas That Work Executive Summaries
    TRANSITIONS FORUM SEPTEMBER 2015 Curbing Corruption: Ideas That Work Executive Summaries www.li.com www.prosperity.com www.foreignpolicy.com/channel/democracy-lab/ ABOUT THE LEGATUM INSTITUTE The Legatum Institute is an international think tank and educational charity focussed on promoting prosperity. We do this by researching our core themes of revitalising capitalism and democracy. The Legatum Prosperity IndexTM, our signature publication, ranks 142 countries in terms of wealth and wellbeing. Through research programmes including The Culture of Prosperity, Transitions Forum, and the Economics of Prosperity, the Institute seeks to understand what drives and restrains national success and individual flourishing. The Institute co-publishes with Foreign Policy magazine, Democracy Lab, whose on- the-ground journalists report on political transitions around the world. The Legatum Institute is based in London and an independent member of the Legatum Group, a private investment group with a 27 year heritage of global investment in businesses and programmes that promote sustainable human development. ABOUT CURBING CORRUPTION: IDEAS THAT WORK The Democracy Lab and Legatum Institute have commissioned a series of case studies that examine specific interventions against corruption which have produced positive results. The aim is to tell a set of stories that illustrate how combatting corruption works in practice, which may offer insight on some of the larger issues across the globe. The papers formed the basis of a conference in September 2015 that focused on broader themes, such as developing methods to combat corruption, promoting good outcomes, and measuring success. www.li.com/curbing-corruption The Legatum Institute would like to thank the Legatum Foundation for their sponsorship and for making this report possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Analysis of Corruption Within Law Enforcement
    RISK ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION WITHIN LAW ENFORCEMENT Strengthening the accountability of law enforcement institutions is of critical importance to effectively combat corruption and break the circle of impunity.” Strengthening the Capacities of Law Enforcement and Judiciary in the Fight against Corruption in Serbia (PACS) RISK ANALYSIS ON THE CURRENT SITUATION WITH REGARD TO THE POSSIBILITIES AND ACTUAL EXTENT OF CORRUPTION WITHIN LAW ENFORCEMENT JOINT EUROPEAN UNION – COUNCIL OF EUROPE PROJECT “Strengthening the Capacities of Law Enforcement and Judiciary in the Fight against Corruption in Serbia” (PACS) www.coe.int/pacs Belgrade • 2015 Publisher Council of Europe, Office in Belgrade Španskih boraca 3, 11070 Belgrade www.coe.int This publication has been prepared within the framework of the project “Strengthening the Capacities of Law Enforcement and Judiciary in the Fight against Corruption in Serbia” (PACS), funded by the European Union and Council of Europe, and implemented by Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official position of the European Union and/or Council of Europe. Authors Robert Šumi, Council of Europe expert Lado Laličić, Council of Europe Secretariat Circulation 200 copies Preparation and printing Kuća Štampe plus www.stampanje.com ISBN 978-86-84437-70-1 All rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, re- cording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]).
    [Show full text]