DOCSLIB.ORG

CORRUPTION and SECURITY “Fighting Dragons Is What Heroes Do“ 2 Welcome Word Credits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Empowering Professionals ISSUE X, MARCH 2016 the magazine1 IACAIssue X, March 2016 LUMNUS EUROPEAN UNION SUPPORT INSTRUMENTS IN THE FIELD OF ANTI-CORRUPTION By Gerhard Levy INTEGRITY COMMITTEES By Lucky Kabondo Muntanga Interview with Sarah Chayes CORRUPTION AND SECURITY “Fighting draGONS IS WHAt heroes do“ 2 Welcome Word CREDITS Dear alumni, IACAlumnus - the magazine is the alumni magazine of the International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA), addressing alumni around the world who have participated, or are Sarah Chayes, author of the book Thieves of currently taking part in trainings designed State and the subject of our cover story, says and implemented by IACA. anti-corruption professionals are the greatest public servants of all. “They may sometimes IACAlumnus - the magazine welcomes contributions by feel like they’re fighting a dragon, but alumni. As a forum to exchange ideas and latest developments, and feature the career paths of our alumni, we fighting dragons is what heroes do,” is her seek to provide you with a medium to stay connected. For message for those of you reflecting on your contributions please contact [email protected]. difficult and sometimes dangerous work in this field. IACA reserves the right to select and edit any contribution to suit the publication. We will not consider contributions that have already been published, in any form, in print or online. Sarah was the keynote speaker at a side- event during IACA’s fourth Assembly of EDITORIAL Parties in Vienna in December 2015. In a Richard Eames special interview with IACAlumnus for our DESIGN first issue of 2016, she talks about the Adrian Ciupagea reaction to her book, reframing the corruption issue, and finding the vulnerable PHOTOGRAPHS points of corrupt networks. IACA, iStock.com IACA alumni around the world continue to ON THE COVER make progress in fighting the corruption “Fighting dragons is what heroes do“ dragon. In this issue Gerhard Levy shows how EU anti-corruption projects help EU PUBLISHER Member States and non-members alike, International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA) Lucky Kabondo Muntanga looks at the role Muenchendorfer Strasse 2 of Integrity Committees in tackling 2361 Laxenburg, Vienna corruption in Zambia, while Claudia AUSTRIA Paluszkiewicz and Sebastian Hamel report +43 (0)2236 710 718 100 www.iaca.int back from the IACA Regional Summer [email protected] Academy - Latin America. As always, we encourage you to write for PRINT Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports/Armed Forces the magazine and to tell us how we can Printing Centre, Vienna, Austria. serve you better. We also look forward to seeing many of you at this summer’s third alumni reunion, preliminary details of which WAIVER are on page 22. IACA promotes academic freedom. The contents of this magazine reflect the opinions of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views or official position of IACA. Sincerely, Neither IACA nor its staff members or partners shall be liable The Alumni Team for any inaccuracy, incompleteness, unavailability or error of the information provided. ISSUE X, MARCH 2016 3 CONTENTS MARCH 2016 MAPS P4 LATIN AmeRICA P18 IACA ALUMNI Mapping by Country INTERVIEW P6 CORRUPTION AND SECURITY Interview with BUILDING BONDS IN THE FIGHT Sarah Chayes AGAINST CORRUPTION By Claudia Paluszkiewicz P21 PUTTING LEARNING INTO PRACTICE EUROpeAN UNION P10 By Sebastian Hamel A WIN-WIN SITUATION European Union support instruments in the field of anti-corruption 3 rd IACA ALUMNI REUNION P22 By Gerhard Levy ZAMBIA P14 INTEGRITY COMMITTEES Institutional Vehicles in the Fight against UPCOMING P23 Corruption What‘s new at IACA ? By Lucky Kabondo Muntanga Conferences 4 IACA ALUMNI MaPPING BY COUNTRY STATUS AS OF 29 FEBRUARY 2016 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply any official endorsement or acceptance by the International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA). No official endorsement or acceptance is implied with regard to the legal status of any country, territory, city, or any area or its authorities, or with regard to the delimitation of frontiers or boundaries. This map was produced to the best of common knowledge. 01. Afghanistan 21. Cambodia 41. Fiji 61. Jordan 02. Albania 22. Cameroon 42. Finland 62. Kenya 03. Algeria 23. Canada 43. France 63. Kyrgyzstan 04. Angola 24. Cayman Islands 44. Gambia 64. Latvia 05. Argentina 25. Chile 45. Georgia 65. Lebanon 06. Australia 26. China 46. Germany 66. Lesotho 07. Austria 27. Colombia 47. Greece 67. Liberia 08. Azerbaijan 28. Costa Rica 48. Grenada 68. Libya 09. Bahrain 29. Congo 49. Guinea 69. Lithuania 10. Bangladesh 30. Côte d’Ivoire 50. Guatemala 70. Luxembourg 11. Belarus 31. Curaçao 51. Haiti 71. Madagascar 12. Belgium 32. Cyprus 52. Hungary 72. Malawi 13. Bermuda 33. Czech Republic 53. India 73. Malaysia 14. Bhutan 34. Democratic Republic of the Congo 54. Indonesia 74. Malta 15. Bosnia and Herzegovina 35. Denmark 55. Iraq 75. Mexico 16. Brazil 36. Dominican Republic 56. Ireland 76. Mongolia 17. British Virgin Islands 37. El Salvador 57. Islamic Republic of Iran 77. Montserrat 18. Bulgaria 38. Egypt 58. Israel 78. Morocco 19. Burkina Faso 39. Estonia 59. Italy 79. Mozambique 20. Burundi 40. Ethiopia 60. Japan 80. Myanmar ISSUE X, MARCH 2016 5 61. Jordan 81. Namibia 101. Saudi Arabia 120. Timor-Leste 62. Kenya 82. Nepal 102. Senegal 121. Togo 63. Kyrgyzstan 83. Netherlands 103. Serbia 122. Trinidad and Tobago 64. Latvia 84. New Zealand 104. Sierra Leone 123. Tunisia 65. Lebanon 85. Niger 105. Singapore 124. Turkey 66. Lesotho 86. Nigeria 106. Sint Maarten 125. Turks and Caicos Islands 67. Liberia 87. Norway 107. Slovakia 126. Uganda 68. Libya 88. Oman 108. Solomon Islands 127. Ukraine 69. Lithuania 89. Pakistan 109. South Africa 128. United Kingdom 70. Luxembourg 90. Paraguay 110. South Sudan 129. United Republic of Tanzania 71. Madagascar 91. Peru 111. Spain 130. Uruguay 72. Malawi 92. Philippines 112. Sudan 131. USA 73. Malaysia 93. Poland 113. Swaziland 132. Uzbekistan 74. Malta 94. Portugal 114. Sweden 133. Venezuela 75. Mexico 95. Republic of Korea 115. Switzerland 134. Viet Nam 76. Mongolia 96. Republic of Moldova 116. Syrian Arab Republic 135. Yemen 77. Montserrat 97. Romania 117. Tajikistan 136. Zambia 78. Morocco 98. Russian Federation 118. Thailand 137. Zimbabwe 79. Mozambique 99. Rwanda 119. The former Yugoslav 80. Myanmar 100. Saint Kitts Republic of Macedonia 6 PHOTO COURTESY OF KAVEH SARDARI Interview with Sarah Chayes CORRUPTION AND SECURITY “Fighting dragons is what heroes do“ ISSUE X, MARCH 2016 7 In her recent book Thieves of State, Sarah Chayes highlighted the largely overlooked nexus between corruption and acute security crises. She elaborated on this theme as the keynote speaker at a side-event during IACA’s fourth Assembly of Parties (AoP) in Vienna in December 2015. In a separate interview with IACA at the AoP, she talked about the reaction to her book, reframing the corruption issue, and finding the vulnerable points of corrupt networks. ell us first of all about your book and the reaction issue or a brake on development, or as introducing economic to it. Was there anything that really stood out for inefficiencies into the system. The human dimension of it has T you? been ignored. So people miss the way the indignation that corruption generates is responsible for some very extreme A couple of things. I did get the sense that for some people I was reactions on the part of populations, be it revolutions or joining articulating something that they sort of understood but hadn’t extremist movements. quite put together, like joining dots. But secondly, some outreach I got surprised me. For example I was contacted by the U.S. I think corruption has been misframed, and as a result of the Department of Commerce, which had not been one of my misframing it’s always seen as a secondary consideration. So targets. My targets had been the more predictable foreign or whatever your priority is as a private sector actor or a public defence ministries. Then I realized “but of course!” There’s a official - whether it’s delivering a health programme in a hugely important issue for the private sector and in particular developing country, having good diplomatic relations with your trade promotion on the part of western countries that consider counterparts, or security - trumps corruption. But what people themselves to be non-corrupt. They will often be pushing for haven’t understood is that they will never achieve their immediate good deals for their industries in countries that are corrupt, and imperatives if they ignore corruption. good deals are achieved in a sense by colluding with corruption. Or private sector actors are thinking only about how to navigate Does it make sense to fight corruption at the national corrupt environments rather than how their interaction with level, or does the approach need to be more these environments is in fact enabling and facilitating the international, more global? strengthening of kleptocratic networks. So these companies bear a certain degree of responsibility for the negative outcomes There’s a very important international dimension to corruption. that may result, including security outcomes. In some cases kleptocratic networks in a given country spill over borders. And some of the countries that consider themselves to Corruption is a huge problem but we’re not talking be uncorrupt are in fact the ones providing the most services to about it. Why not? corrupt officials overseas, so you could even say that the network extends to western developed nation service providers. By that I Good question! I think partly the way it’s been framed in the past mean banks, real estate companies, lawyers, et cetera. has been an incredible doze. It’s been phrased as an efficiency 8 SARAH CHAYES However, it’s very important to understand the dynamics of How important a role can civil society groups play? corruption on a country or regional basis, because they’re very different.
Recommended publications
  • Lebanese American University

    Lebanese American University

    Lebanese American University The Power of Silence: Impunity and Accountability in Lebanon By Michelle Bouchebel Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Affairs School of Arts and Sciences May 2014 © 2014 Michelle Bouchebel All Rights Reserved ii iii iv To my beloved father, mother and brothers v AKNOWLEDGMENTS This research would not have been possible without the help and assistance of many people. First, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Walid Moubarak who devotedly guided me throughout the whole process of producing this thesis. I am also very grateful to Dr. Marwan Rowayheb and Dr. Makram Ouaiss for being members of my thesis committee. Thanks also goes to the Lebanese American University for all the support this institution offered me throughout my graduate studies, Finally, special thanks go to Martti Antola, Christalla Yakinthou, my family and my friends who were always there for me throughout this process and offered motivation and support. vi The Power of Silence: Impunity and Accountability in Lebanon Michelle M. Bouchebel ABSTRACT The Power of Silence: Impunity and Accountability in Lebanon by Michelle Bouchebel explores the extent to which transitional justice mechanisms could help to strengthen accountability and the rule of law in Lebanon and suggests several options for the kinds of transitional justice mechanisms that could be explored, taking into account the current political context of the country. The study draws on, and seeks to contribute to, literature on transitional justice as well as literature on the Lebanese civil war and its aftermath.
  • A Critical Enquiry on the Anti-Corruption Programe

    A Critical Enquiry on the Anti-Corruption Programe

    THE IMPLEMENTATION AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ANTI-CORRUPTION PROGRAMME OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF KENYA IN MASENO NORTH DIOCESE BY PHILIP AMUKOA OWASI A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN RELIGION DEPARTMENT OF RELIGION, THEOLOGY, AND PHILOSOPHY, SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES MASENO UNIVERSITY ©2018 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for any degree program in any University. Philip Amukoa Owasi Reg No. PG/Ph.D./REL/041/04 Signature ___________________________ Date______________________ This research project has been submitted for examination with the approval of the University supervisors: Prof. Sussy Gumo Department of Religion, Theology and Philosophy Maseno University Signature ___________________________ Date______________________ Prof. Crispinus Iteyo Department of Peace and Conflict Studies Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology Signature ___________________________ Date______________________ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to express my deep sincere appreciation to Maseno University, School of Graduate Studies for granting me an opportunity to undertake my doctorate degree. Special thanks also go to my supervisors: Prof. Sussy Gumo and Prof. Crispinus Iteyo for their critical but constructive supervision of my thesis. My sincere thanks are also extended to the lecturers, Department of Religion, Theology and Philosophy, Maseno University, for their support, guidance, helpful suggestions and positive criticism which led to the development of this research work. My special thanks is also to Rev. Bowers Lihanda the former Principal of The Pentecostal Bible College (PBC) Nyang‘ri Kenya, Rev Patrick Lihanda General Superintendent P.A.G Kenya and The Pentecostal Assemblies of God (P.A.G) Kenya, Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada (PAOC), The Governor of Vihiga County - Rev.
  • Corruption As an Obstacle for Doing Business in the Western Balkans: a Business Sector Perspective

    Corruption As an Obstacle for Doing Business in the Western Balkans: a Business Sector Perspective

    Jelena Budak and Edo Rajh Corruption as an Obstacle for Doing Business in the Western Balkans: A Business Sector Perspective Prosinac. December 2011 . Radni materijali EIZ-a EIZ Working Papers ekonomski institut, zagreb Br No. EIZ-WP-1104 Radni materijali EIZ-a EIZ Working Papers EIZ-WP-1104 Corruption as an Obstacle for Doing Business in the Western Balkans: A Business Sector Perspective Jelena Budak Senior Research Associate The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Trg J. F. Kennedyja 7 10000 Zagreb, Croatia T. 385 1 2362 228 F. 385 1 2335 165 E. [email protected] Edo Rajh Senior Research Associate The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Trg J. F. Kennedyja 7 10000 Zagreb, Croatia T. 385 1 2362 298 F. 385 1 2335 165 E. [email protected] www.eizg.hr Zagreb, December 2011 IZDAVAÈ / PUBLISHER: Ekonomski institut, Zagreb / The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Trg J. F. Kennedyja 7 10000 Zagreb Croatia T. 385 1 2362 200 F. 385 1 2335 165 E. [email protected] www.eizg.hr ZA IZDAVAÈA / FOR THE PUBLISHER: Sandra Švaljek, ravnateljica / director GLAVNA UREDNICA / EDITOR: eljka Kordej-De Villa UREDNIŠTVO / EDITORIAL BOARD: Ivan-Damir Aniæ Valerija Botriæ Edo Rajh Paul Stubbs IZVRŠNI UREDNIK / EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Josip Šipiæ TEHNIÈKI UREDNIK / TECHNICAL EDITOR: Vladimir Sukser Tiskano u 80 primjeraka Printed in 80 copies ISSN 1846-4238 e-ISSN 1847-7844 Stavovi izraeni u radovima u ovoj seriji publikacija stavovi su autora i nuno ne odraavaju stavove Ekonomskog instituta, Zagreb. Radovi se objavljuju s ciljem poticanja rasprave i kritièkih komentara kojima æe se unaprijediti buduæe verzije rada. Autor(i) u potpunosti zadravaju autorska prava nad èlancima objavljenim u ovoj seriji publikacija.
  • Crime and Culture : Breaking New Ground in Corruption Research

    Crime and Culture : Breaking New Ground in Corruption Research

    SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH PROJECT: CRIME AND CULTURE Crime as a Cultural Problem. The Relevance of Perceptions of Corruption to Crime Prevention. A Comparative Cultural Study in the EU-Accession States Bulgaria and Romania, the EU-Candidate States Turkey and Croatia and the EU-States Germany, Greece and United Kingdom Dirk Tänzler Konstadinos Maras Angelos Giannakopoulos Crime and Culture Breaking New Ground in Corruption Research Discussion Paper Series No 1 2007 2 Dr. Dirk Tänzler is currently visiting Professor at the University of Zurich 2007, Assistant Professor at the University of Konstanz and Co-ordinator of the EU-Research-Consortium ‘Crime and Culture’ 2006-2008. He was Visiting Professor at Vienna University 2005, 2006, Visiting Lecturer at the University of Luzern 2005-2008, Zeppelin University, Friedrichs- hafen 2006, University of Salzburg 2005, Humboldt University of Berlin 1995, 1996. Director of the Sozialwissenschaftliches Archiv Konstanz (“Alfred-Schütz-Gedächtnis-Archiv)/ Zentralarchiv der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2000-2005, Research Fellow at the University of Konstanz 1999-2000, Research Fellow at the Science Centre Berlin for Social Research (WZB) 1993-1997, Research Fellow at the Institute for Economic Culture at Boston University 1991-1992. He earned his postdoctoral degree (Habilitation) at the University of Konstanz 2005 and his Ph.D. at J.-W. Goethe University of Frankfurt a.M. 1990. His special research and teaching interests are Sociological Theory, Social Philosophy, History of Sociology, Sociology of Knowledge, Sociology of Culture, Political Sociology, Qualitative Methods, Hermeneutics, Media Analysis, Visual Sociology. Dr. Dr. Konstadinos Maras is Lecturer at the University of Tübingen, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Institute of Art History and research assistant at the “European Centre for Scientific, Ecumenical and Cultural Co-operation”, Würzburg, responsible for documentation and research on the European and International Philhellenism.
  • Anticorruption Policy in Croatia: Benchmark for Eu

    Anticorruption Policy in Croatia: Benchmark for Eu

    1 Damir Grubiša Anti-Corruption Policy in Croatia: a Benchmark for EU Accession In 1998, the European Commission concluded in its evaluation of the central and east European countries' requests for EU membership in the context of the preparation for Agenda 2000 that the fight against political corruption in these countries needed to be upgraded. The Commission's report on the progress of each candidate country can be summed up as follows: "The efforts undertaken by candidate countries are not always adequate to the entity of the problem itself. Although some of these countries initiate new programmes for the control and prevention of corruption, it is too early for a judgment on the efficiency of such measures. A lack of determination can be seen in confronting this problem and in rooting out corruption in the greatest part of the candidate countries". Similar evaluations were repeated in subsequent reports on the progress of candidate countries from central and east Europe. Accordingly, it was concluded in 2001 that political corruption is a serious problem in five out of ten countries of that region: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Slovakia, and a constant problem in three more countries: Hungary, Lithuania and Latvia. The Commission refrained from expressing critical remarks only in the case of two countries – Estonia and Slovenia. Up to 2002, only eight out of fifteen member states ratified the basic instrument that the EU had adopted against corruption, namely the EU Convention on the Safeguarding of Economic Interests of the European Communities. Some of the founding members of the European Community were rated as countries with a "high level of corruption" – Germany, France and, specifically, Italy.
  • Combating Systemic Corruption in Africa: Altitudinal, Attitudinal, Confrontational Or Constitutional?

    Combating Systemic Corruption in Africa: Altitudinal, Attitudinal, Confrontational Or Constitutional?

    Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 9 (2016 9) 2092-2123 ~ ~ ~ УДК 328.185(1-926) Combating Systemic Corruption in Africa: Altitudinal, Attitudinal, Confrontational or Constitutional? Emmanuel Oladipo Ojo* Ekiti State University Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria Received 09.06.2016, received in revised form 12.07.2016, accepted 18.08.2016 The fact and reality of systemic corruption in Africa is irrefutable. It is therefore not surprising that the subject has attracted quite a great deal of attention from the academia. Thus, to assert that corruption is the greatest impediment to the socio-political and economic development of Africa is a superfluous understatement and a mere reinstatement of the obvious. Across Africa, incredibly huge sums of money sufficient to conduct free, fair and credible elections, equip the military and the police for optimum performance, revolutionize agriculture, rejuvenate education, resuscitate infrastructures, reinvigorate the economy, revamp the industrial sector and achieve scientific and technological emancipation end up in private vaults and pockets. The consequences of this are impaired economy, immobile technology, fractured infrastructures, ill equipped armed forces, unmitigated poverty and unprecedented brigandage and banditry. This paper does not intend to contribute to the oversubscribed debate on the origins, theories and causes of corruption in Africa; rather, it addresses the question of the option(s) that could best combat systemic corruption in Africa. The paper argues that neither the altitudinal factor nor constitutional provisions could combat corruption in Africa and concludes that only attitudinal change or the confrontation option could liberate the continent from systemic corruption. The descriptive and analytical method of historical research was employed in the analysis of the data obtained for the study.
  • Prosecution of Corruption”

    Prosecution of Corruption”

    ACN Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central National Anticorruption Directorate, Asia Romania OECD Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia EXPERT SEMINAR “EFFECTIVE MEANS OF INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF CORRUPTION” Held in Bucharest, Romania on 20 – 22 October 2010 Hosted by the National Anti-Corruption Directorate of Romania PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEMINAR These proceedings were prepared by the Secretariat of the Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ACN) at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD does not guarantee the accuracy of data included in the presentations and accept no responsibility for any consequences of their use. This document is available for download from the ACN Web site at www.oecd.org/corruption/acn Participants in the expert seminar “Effective Means of Investigation and Prosecution of Corruption”, 20 – 22 October 2010, Bucharest, Romania 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 5 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS ............................................................................................................... 7 TOPIC 1 EFFECTIVE MEANS TO DETECT AND INVESTIGATE CORRUPTION CRIMES .......................... 12 MEANS OF DETECTING AND INVESTIGATING CORRUPTION OFFENCES AND JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS (Juuso Oilinki, Finland) ...............................................................................................................................
  • The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Corruption Research Paper by RAND Europe

    The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Corruption Research Paper by RAND Europe

    The Cost of Non- Europe in the area of Organised Crime and Corruption Annex II - Corruption STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service European Added Value Unit PE 579.319 - March 2016 The Cost of Non-Europe in the area of Organised Crime and Corruption Annex II- The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Corruption Research paper by RAND Europe On 7 September 2015, the Coordinators of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) requested the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) to prepare a 'Cost of Non Europe Report' on Organised Crime and Corruption to support work on the own-initiative report on the fight against corruption and follow-up of the CRIM committee resolution (2015/2110 (INI), Rapporteur Laura Ferrara (EFDD, IT)). In response to this request, a general assessment1, bringing together the research findings of three studies commissioned from outside experts, has been drawn up by the European Added Value Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value within DG EPRS. Its aim is to help improve understanding of the subject matter by providing evidence of the specific benefits that could be achieved through European action to fight organised crime and corruption. The three studies commissioned from outside experts are published as separate documents: - RAND Europe, research paper on the costs of non-Europe in the area of corruption (PE 579.319); - Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) & Economisti Associati srl, research paper on the costs of non-Europe in the area of organised crime (PE 579.318); and - -Prof.
  • Curbing Corruption: Ideas That Work Executive Summaries

    Curbing Corruption: Ideas That Work Executive Summaries

    TRANSITIONS FORUM SEPTEMBER 2015 Curbing Corruption: Ideas That Work Executive Summaries www.li.com www.prosperity.com www.foreignpolicy.com/channel/democracy-lab/ ABOUT THE LEGATUM INSTITUTE The Legatum Institute is an international think tank and educational charity focussed on promoting prosperity. We do this by researching our core themes of revitalising capitalism and democracy. The Legatum Prosperity IndexTM, our signature publication, ranks 142 countries in terms of wealth and wellbeing. Through research programmes including The Culture of Prosperity, Transitions Forum, and the Economics of Prosperity, the Institute seeks to understand what drives and restrains national success and individual flourishing. The Institute co-publishes with Foreign Policy magazine, Democracy Lab, whose on- the-ground journalists report on political transitions around the world. The Legatum Institute is based in London and an independent member of the Legatum Group, a private investment group with a 27 year heritage of global investment in businesses and programmes that promote sustainable human development. ABOUT CURBING CORRUPTION: IDEAS THAT WORK The Democracy Lab and Legatum Institute have commissioned a series of case studies that examine specific interventions against corruption which have produced positive results. The aim is to tell a set of stories that illustrate how combatting corruption works in practice, which may offer insight on some of the larger issues across the globe. The papers formed the basis of a conference in September 2015 that focused on broader themes, such as developing methods to combat corruption, promoting good outcomes, and measuring success. www.li.com/curbing-corruption The Legatum Institute would like to thank the Legatum Foundation for their sponsorship and for making this report possible.
  • Collective Donor Responses to Corruption Cases

    Collective Donor Responses to Corruption Cases

    U4 REPORT November 2013: 1 Collective donor responses: Examining donor responses to corruption cases in Afghanistan, Tanzania and Zambia Maja de Vibe Nils Taxell Paul Beggan Peter Bofin U4 is a web-based resource centre for development practitioners who wish to effectively address corruption challenges in their work. U4 is operated by the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) – an independent centre for research on international development and policy – and is funded by AusAID (Australia), BTC (Belgium), CIDA (Canada), DFID (UK), GIZ (Germany), Norad (Norway), Sida (Sweden) and The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. All views expressed in this Issue are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U4 Partner Agencies or CMI/ U4. Copyright 2013 - CMI/U4 Collective donor responses: Examining donor responses to corruption cases in Afghanistan, Tanzania and Zambia Maja de Vibe Nils Taxell Paul Beggan Peter Bofin U4 Report October 2013 No 1 ! ! Contents "#$%&'()*+),)%-!.......................................................................................................................................!/0 "#1&%2,3!4%*!4551)0/4-/&%3!.........................................................................................................................!0 ! 67)#8-/0)!98,,412!.....................................................................................................................................!0///! ! :41-!;<!92%-=)3/3!1)>&1-! ;. ?%-1&*8#-/&%<!@4-/&%4()!A&1!-=)!3-8*2!.....................................................................................................!;
  • Charles Chulu

    Charles Chulu

    AN EVALUATION OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE ON CORRUPTION ISSUES IN ZAMBIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ZAMBIA NATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION (ZNBC TV1) AND MUVI TELEVISION BY CHARLES EMMANUEL CHULU A Dissertation Submitted to the University of Zambia in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Mass Communication THE UNIVERSITY OF ZAMBIA LUSAKA 2017 i DECLARATION I, CHARLES EMMANUEL CHULU, declare that this dissertation is a representation of my own work; it was and has not previously been submitted for a degree at this or any other University in or outside Zambia. This Dissertation does not contain work or published material from another dissertation submitted to this or any other University. Signed:…………………………………………… Date:……………………………………………… ii COPYRIGHT All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be reproduced or stored in any form or by any means without authorisation in writing from the Author or the University of Zambia. iii CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This Dissertation by Charles Emmanuel Chulu has been approved as having fulfilled the partial requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Mass Communication (MMC) by the University of Zambia. Examiner Signature Date 1. Internal Examiner _______________________ 2. Internal Examiner _______________________ 3. External Examiner _______________________ 4. Supervisor Mr. Fidelis Muzyamba iv ABSTRACT There is a growing concern in Zambia over what many media personnel regard as news worthy stories and in particular corruption-related stories. Many argue that the media would rather cover a political story than a news beat on corruption which is of great significance to their audience. Hence one is tempted to wonder as to whether the media deliberately ignore such stories or the ownership of a particular media house has a bearing on the type of news they cover.
  • Corruption in Croatia. Institutional Settings and Practical Experiences

    Corruption in Croatia. Institutional Settings and Practical Experiences

    Bejaković, P., Corruption in Croatia. ..., Politička misao, Vol. XXXIX, (2002), No. 5, pp. 128–155 128 Studies Pregledni članak 352/354:343.352>(497.5) 343.352:35>(497.5) Primljeno: 26. studenog 2002. Corruption in Croatia. Institutional Settings and Practical Experiences PREDRAG BEJAKOVIĆ Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb Summary Although the Croatian government has expressed a determined obligation to undertake measures against corruption, still there are opinions that the fight against corruption is not given the political acceptance and respect that are their due. After the Introduction, in the second part is raised the issue of public admini- stration, while in next part is analysed the situation in judiciary. One can estimate that in the Croatia there are different laws and institutions in charge of reducing the corruption, but serious problem is a low level of law enforcement discussed in the part four. Part five is dedicated to social and economic sources of corruption (like privatization, informal economy etc), while in part six is stressed that in Croatia the regulation of the funding of political parties is almost completely un- derdeveloped. The last chapter before conclusion remarks analyses the role of civil society and the media. Key words: corruption, countries in transition, Croatia, public administration Mailing adress: Institut za javne financije, Katančićeva 5, HR 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] 1. Introduction In January 2000 Croatia saw changes in government when a coalition of political parties won the elections against the ruling HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union) which led the country for the whole decade. During the period of HDZ rule many cases of cor- ruption had been raised by journalists, but apart from media pressure, those suspected of corruption or being involved in organised crime faced no further consequences for their possible wrongdoings.