The Distribution and Abundance of Nematodes (Especially the Plant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Distribution and Abundance of Nematodes (Especially the Plant *IAi'TE INSTÍTUTE lt- t. €€ UBRÂRY TllE D¡STRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF NEMATODES (especially the Plant Parasites) lN THE ARID REGION OF SOUTH AUSTRAUA by J. M. Nobbs. Department of Plant Pathotogy, Waite Agricultural Research lnstitute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia. Thesis submitted to the Universiy of Adelaide in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. September 1987 ârub¿æl t6n/61 Acknowledgements. I wish to thank Professor H. R. Wallace who supervised me during this work : his advice, encouragement and direction are gratefully acknowledged. I also wish to thank Dr. J. M. Fisher for his advice during glasshouse and laboratory experiments and Dr. Siddiqi and Mrs. F. Reay for taxonomic assistance. Appreciation is given to Mr. G. Gloster and family for their aid in making the pastoral property, Plumbago Station, available for exlensive field experiments and thanks are extended to all those managers and owners of pastoral properties who extended permission to sample on their property. I wish to thank the Australian Bureau of Flora and Fauna for the travel scholarship which allowed the extensive field survey of the arid region to proceed. I would also like to thank the University of Adelaide for the award of a University Research Grant for the final 2 and a half years of work. The contribution of the Biometry department and Word Processing Section is gratefully acknowledged. I express my appreciation for the assistance given by the students and staff of the Department of Plant Pathology, at the Waite lnstitute. I would also like to express my deep appreciation of my parent's willingness to accompany me on my field excursions and their encouragement and support during the period of my study. Declaration. I hereby declare that this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any degree or diploma in any University. To the best of my knowledge and belief, no material described herein has been published or wrilten by another person except when due reference is made in the text. I give consent for lhis copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University library, lo be available for loan and photocopying. Date TABLE OF CONTH{TS. Acknowledgernents. Declaration. SUMMARY. a CII-APTER 1 : INTRODUCTION. 1 CHAPTER 2 : STUDY AREA. 2.1. INTRODUCTION. 5 2.2. PAST CLÏMATE. 5 2.3 . PRESENT CLIMATE. 7 2./+ . PRESENT DISTRTBUTION OF VEGETATION. 9 2.5 . PRESENT DISTRTBUTION OF LANDIORItfS. 12 ¿.o . CONCLUS]ON AND DISCUSSION. 13 CHAPTER 3 THE IDE}JTIETCATION AND GENERAI DISTRTBUÎION OF THE TYTTIICTIID PLANT PARASITES IN THE ARID REGION OF SOUTH AUSTRAL]A. 3.1. INTRODUCTION. 15 3.2. MATERTALS AND METHODS. 16 ,3 .3 . CLASSI FI CATION. 3.3.1. The Genera of Plant Parasitic Nematodes found in the Arid Region of S.A. 18 3.3.2. Key to ',he $cnera of Plant Parasitic Ncmatodes 1n the Arid Region of S.A. 18 3.3.3 . The Family Dolichodoridae. 20 29 3.3. /+ . The Farnily HoPlolaimidae. 3 .3.5 . Other Plant Parasitic Nematodes. 3/+ 3.3.6 . Stíde Coll-ection. 3/+ 3./+. GE}TERAL DISTR.IBUTION OF PL¡.NT PARÀSITIC NEMATODES. 35 3.5. GÐ{ERAL CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION. JO CHAPTEP. I, THE RETATIONSHIP BET!ÙEn{ THE D]STRIBUTION OF PLANT SPECIES AND NEI'ÍAT,ODES, WITH SPECIFIC RET'EREIICE TO THT TYLMTCHID PLANT PAR.ÀSITES. At.1. INTP"ODUCTTON. 38 4.2. DISTRIBUTION OF NE},1ATODES I¡IITHIN DEFINED AREAS. lr. 2.1 . Introduction. ?'9 lr. 2.2. Depth Analysis. 39 lr. 2.3. Distribution of Nematode Tropkr"ic Groups within Areas of Different, Vegetation and Land.forns. /+1 CHÀPTER I, Z Conttl. /r.2.tr. Association between the Distr=ibution of P1a.nt Species e.nd the Different Nematode Trophic Groups within a particul-ar Vegetation and Landforn. /+6 tr.2.5. Associati-on of Ne¡natsdes of Different Trophic Groups with Areas of Diseased' Plants. 51 /r.2.6. Coúclusion. 53 1T.3. THE REI,ATIONSHIP BETUJEEN CHANGES IN NIIMBERS OF THE DIFFER.ENT TROPHIC GF"OUPS A}ID IIME- L.3.1. Introduction. 5l+ ln.3.2. Materials and. Methods. 55 /+.3.3, Results. 57 lr.3.1r. Conclusion. 6o tr. /r. DrscussroN. 60 CHAPTER 5 THE BIOLOGY A}ID HOST/PAzu\SITE Rtr,ATIONSHIP OF TIIE STUNT NB,IATODE Tylenchorhrmchus tobari SÀUER AND ANNfl,LS, 1981. 5.1. INTRODUCTION. 63 5.2. PREI,IMII{AP.Y STUDIES 5.2.1. Introducti-on 63 5.2.2. Sel-ection of Host Plants. 6/+ 5.2.3. Assessment of Extraction Method' 65 5.3./+. Inoculation Methods. 66 5.3.5. Culturing of T. tobari in Agar. 67 5.3.6. Soil Mediun. 68 5.3.7 . Tegrperature. 69 5.3. BIOLOGY 0F T. tobari. 5.3.1. Introduction. 70 5.3.2. Life CYc1e. 71 5.3.3. Infectiorr Rate and Fecundity. 72 5.3.4. Feeding Behaviour'. 72 5.3.5. Summary of the BiolcgY of T. tobari 73 5. /+. HOST / PARASITE Ril,ATIONSHIP. 5. /*.1. Introduction 73 5./r.2. The Effec+, of Different Initial Densities on the Final Number of Nenatodes ¿rnd the Gror¡th of the Host Plant 7/+ CHAPTER 5 : Contd. 5./+.3. Interaction between Different Densities of Nematodes and Plants. 76 5. lr. lr. Conclusion. 77 5.5. DISCUSSION. ?8 CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION. 80 REFERENCES. APPINDIX. SUMMARY. The compos¡tion of the plant paras¡tic nematode community in the arid region of South Australia was determined from a general field survey. Most species of plant parasitic nematodes identified had been described from other areas of Australia, but rarely outside Australia, indicating that they are probably endemic. Some new species, but no new genera, were found and the plant nematodes found were mainly migratory ecloparasites. A system of classifying each site in relation to vegetation and landform characters was developed from existing systems, thereby enabling analysis to be made of relationships between particular site characteristics and the frequency of occurrence of particular plant parasitic nematodes. Tylenchorhynchus tobariwas the most abundant and widely distributed plant nematode within the arid region of South Australia and an association was found between the distribution of Atriplex vesicaria and the nematode. T.tobari was successfully cultured on selected species of Atriplex (salt bush) and the biology and hosVparasite relationships of the nematode were investigated. T.tobari had little or no effect on the growth of an ephemeral saltbush (A.spongiosal; A.vesicaria was found to be an unsuitable experimental plant. The duration of the lifecycle of T.tobari, its feeding behaviour and embryology were similar to other Tylenchorhynchus species. lt is suggested that the lack of damage to the host plant may be associated with the feeding behaviour of T.tobari. The association between nematode trophic groups and plant species was also investigated, with the sampling of particular areas of similar or diff erent vegetation/landform formations. Particular plant parasitic nematodes (other than T.tobari) were found to be associated with specific vegetation/landform formations and host plants. The bacterial feeders were the most abundant trophic aroup in the arid region of S.4., with the other trophic groups occurring in differing proportions, depending on the site sampled. Survival of nematodes over time was also investigated. The method of survival of nematodes appeared to be associated with coiling. When soil was sampled during a'dry' period, the total numbers of nematodes were low, as was the proportion of straight to coiled nematodes. When moist soil was sampled, the proportion of straight to coiled nematodes increased, with a corresponding increase in the total number of nematodes. 11 in the This study indicated that the structure of the nematode community This study concentrated arid region of S.A. is similar to that in other arid or desert regions. plant nematodes' other on determining associations and distribut¡on patterns belween nematodes on the ecology trophic groups and host plants. A discussion of the influence of soil on possible of arid regions is presented in the concluding chapter, as well as some views dispersal mechanisms and the evolution of particular plant parasitic nematodes' \,VAJIL ¡l'ì:)l ¡f ii i i t.IBiIARY CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION. This study was aimed at investigating the composil¡on, distribution and associat¡on of plant paras¡tic nematodes in soil from the arid region of South Australia. The arid regions of the world are characterised by the patchiness of precipitation and the relationship between adequacy of rainfall and a hypothetical evapotranspiration of natural vegetation (McGinnies et al., 1968). The nematode is fundamentally an aquatic animal (Jenkins and Taylor, 1967) whose main response to dehydration is to form a quiescent or anhydrobiotic state (Cooper and Van Gundy, 1971), the ability and form of which varies between species. The anhydrobiotic state (or coiling) can be induced in some species by using chambers in which the relative humidity can be altered (Demeure et al., 1979a;Ellenby, 1975; Huang and Huang,1974i Roessner and Perry, 1975; Safed and Roessner, 1984; Townsend, 1984). One of the aims of this study was to investigate the changes in numbers of nematodes over time in the field, and to determine the ability (and form) of the nematodes which were able to survive desiccation. This subject has received little attent¡on in Australia. The composition of terrestrial nematode communities varies within natural and artificial ecosystems and between plants and plant communities. The distribution of nematodes in space is related to environmenlal influences, such as soil moisture and presence of food (Wallace, 1973; Whitford et al., 1983). There are four main trophic groups of nematodes (omnivore/predator, baclerial feeders, fungal feeders and plant parasiles) which have been separated on their apparent food requirements.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation Action Planning
    Conservation Action Planning 2015 Mallee Emu-Wren Stipiturus mallee Black-eared Miner Manorina melanotis Western Whipbird (eastern) Psophodes nigrogularis leucogaster Red-lored Whistler Pachycephala rufogularis Regent Parrot (eastern) Polytelis anthopeplus monarchoides Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata Threatened Mallee Birds Project Compiled by: Rebecca Boulton and Jenny Lau (BirdLife Australia) 1 Acknowledgments: Members of the Threatened Mallee Birds CAP Implementation Team including Rebecca Boulton, Jenny Lau, Wendy Stubbs, Chris Hedger, Vicky-Jo Russell, Jill Fleming, Rohan Clarke, Simon Watson, Sarah Brown, Simon Nally, Liberty Olds, Samantha Vine, David Parker and Peter Copley. Cover photos by Rohan Clarke & Chris Tzaros. This document may be cited as: Boulton, R.L. and Lau, J. (2015) Threatened Mallee Birds Conservation Action Plan, Report June 2015. Report to the Threatened Mallee Birds Implementation Team, BirdLife Australia. Version: 16/06/15 Abbreviations MEW Mallee Emu-wren BEM Black-eared Miner WWB Western Whipbird RLW Red-lored Whistler RP Regent Parrot MF Malleefowl CAP Conservation Action Plan YTM Yellow-throated Miner DEWNR Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources DELWP Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning DEDJTR Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources DoE Department of the Environment, Canberra OEH Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW PV Parks Victoria BirdLife BirdLife Australia ARI Arthur Rylah Institute ANU Australian National University TNC The Nature Conservancy
    [Show full text]
  • West Wyalong Solar Project
    WEST WYALONG SOLAR PROJECT Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Prepared for: Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd c/- Urbis Tower 2, Level 23 Darling Park, 201 Sussex St SYDNEY NSW 2000 SLR Ref: 610.18343-R01 Version No: -v4.0 March 2019 PREPARED BY SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd ABN 29 001 584 612 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia (PO Box 447 New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia) T: +61 2 4037 3200 E: [email protected] www.slrconsulting.com BASIS OF REPORT This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd (the Client). Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of the Client. No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from SLR SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Date Prepared Checked Authorised 610.18343-R01-v4.0 26 March 2019 Gilbert Whyte Jeremy Pepper Jeremy Pepper Page ii Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 610.18343-R01-v4.0_20190326.docx West Wyalong Solar Project March 2019 Biodiversity Development Assessment Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lightsource Development Services Australia Pty Ltd is proposing the development of a Solar Farm Project to be located to the north-east of West Wyalong in Western NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • La Symbiose Frankia-Casuarina Equisetifolia
    Université Paris VII LA SYMBIOSE Franltia - Casuarina Equisetifolia Thése de Doctorat d’Etat soutenue le 514 j/ p4 Par Daniel GAUTMIER pour obtenir le grade de Docteur és-Sciences devant le jury composé de Président J. P. AUBERT Rapporteur P. GADAL Directeur de Thèse Y. DOMMERGUES Examinateurs C. ELMERICH J. TAVLITZKI ASSESSMENT OF N2 FIXATION BY CASUARINA EQUISETIFOLIA INOCULATED WITH FRANKIA ORS021001 USING 15N METHODS 0. GAUTHIER, H.G. DIEM, Y.R. DOMMERGUES 'CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFICWE OFFICE DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE OUTRE MER B.P. 1386, DAKAR, SENEGAL. AND F. GANRY INSTITUT S~N~GALAIS DE RECHERCHES AGRICOLES INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE TROPICALE BAMBEY, SENEGAL. 0000000000000 1 Summclny 1 Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings,uninoculated orwith Frankia strain ORS021001 were grown for 4.5 months in pou- . ches, then transplanted into 1 m3 concrete containers for- ming 1 m2 microplots. Trees were harvested 6.5 months later when they were 11 months old. N2 fixation was mesured using three methods of assessment : the direct isotopic method, the A value method and the difference method. Estimations of N2 fixation during the 6.5 months following transplanta- tion were respectively 3.27, 2.31 and 3.07 g N2 per tree. From these values it was calculated that about 40-60 kg N2 would be fixed per ha in a year at normal densities of 10,000 trees ha -1 . The results of this experiment confirm that Frankia strain ORS021001 can be confidently recommen- ded to inoculate casuarinas in the field. Miens to improve nodulation and subsequently N2 fixation by casuarinas are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Traits and Their Effect on Fire and Decomposition
    Plant traits and their effect on fire and decomposition Saskia Grootemaat BSc Forest and Nature Conservation MSc Forest and Nature Conservation Submitted November 2015 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences Department of Biological Sciences Macquarie University North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia Principal supervisor: Dr. Ian J. Wright Associate supervisors: Prof. Peter M. van Bodegom and Prof. Johannes H.C. Cornelissen Table of contents Table of contents Summary 9 Statement 11 Contribution 13 Acknowledgements 17 1. General introduction 21 The importance of studying wildfires 21 Fuel availability 24 Litter dynamics 25 Fuel flammability and plant traits 27 Research objectives and thesis outline 29 References 32 2. Burn or rot: leaf traits explain why flammability and decomposability are decoupled across species 39 Summary 40 Introduction 41 Material and methods 44 Site and species selection 44 Material types 46 Leaf trait measurements 47 Decomposition experiment 48 Burning experiments 48 Calculations and statistical analysis 50 Results 51 Leaf traits as drivers of decomposition 51 Differences in flammability among species 52 Correlations between flammability parameters 54 Leaf traits as drivers of flammability 55 Decomposition and flammability 58 Table of contents Discussion 60 Flammability decoupled from decomposability 60 Trait relationships unravelled 61 Implications 63 Acknowledgements 64 Data Accessibility 64 References 65 Supporting information 71 3. Towards a better understanding of fuel bed flammability;
    [Show full text]
  • Identity of the Casuarina Sp. in Turkey Turkish Journal of Weed Science
    Turkish Journal of Weed Science 20(2):2019:159-168 Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tjws Turkish Journal of Weed Science © Turkish Weed Science Society Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article Identity of the Casuarina sp. in Turkey Ian T. RILEY1*, Leyla Nur KORKMAZ1 1Department of Plant Production and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Technologies, Niğde Omer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey. *Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Sheoaks (Casuarina sp.) are a common ornamental and amenity trees grown in provinces of Turkey along the Mediterranean and Aegean coasts. In the literature this species is identified as Casuarina equisetifolia L., however, recent field observations have brought this into doubt. Qualitative and quantitative characters for 14 specimens (7 female and 7 male) collected from Izmir, Dalaman, Adana and Ceyhan, indicated that the correct determination is Casuarina cunninghamiana Miq. This is a new record for Turkey for a species that is considered an invasive woody weed in up to 20 countries. However, as this species has been grown in Turkey of many decades and there is no evidence of naturalization, it is not considered to represent a potential threat and no immediate management action is considered necessary. Key Words: casual, Casuarina cunninghamiana, alien flora, identity, invasiveness, Turkey. INTRODUCTION A range of Australian trees are grown in Turkey, mostly Even observed from a distance, the sheoaks in as ornamentals, but also for forestry and agricultural uses Turkey are tall, stately trees more reminiscent of such as shelter belts. The most common and noticeable is Casuarina cunninghamiana Miq. than C. equisetifolia; Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Species
    Birdlife Australia Gluepot Reserve PLANT SPECIES LIST These are species recorded by various observers. Species in bold have been vouchered. The list is being continually updated NATIVE SPECIES Species name Common name Acacia acanthoclada Harrow Wattle Acacia aneura Mulga Acacia brachybotrya Grey Mulga Acacia colletioides Wait a While Acacia hakeoides Hakea leaved Wattle Acacia halliana Hall’s Wattle Acacia ligulata Sandhill Wattle Acacia nyssophylla Prickly Wattle Acacia oswaldii Boomerang Bush Acacia rigens Needle Wattle Acacia sclerophylla var. sclerophylla Hard Leaved Wattle Acacia wilhelmiana Wilhelm’s Wattle Actinobole uliginosum Flannel Cudweed Alectryon oleifolius ssp. canescens Bullock Bush Amphipogon caricinus Long Grey Beard Grass Amyema miquelii Box Mistletoe Amyema miraculosa ssp. boormanii Fleshy Mistletoe Amyema preissii Wire Leaved Acacia Mistletoe Angianthus tomentosus Hairy Cup Flower Atriplex acutibractea Pointed Salt Bush Atriplex rhagodioides Spade Leaved Salt Bush Atriplex stipitata Bitter Salt Bush Atriplex vesicaria Bladder Salt Bush Austrodanthonia caespitosa Wallaby Grass Austrodanthonia pilosa Wallaby Grass Austrostipa elegantissima Elegant Spear Grass Austrostipa hemipogon Half Beard Spear grass Austrostipa nitida Balcarra Spear grass Austrostipa scabra ssp. falcata Rough Spear Grass Austrostipa scabra ssp. scabra Rough Spear Grass Austrostipa tuckeri Tucker’s Spear grass Baeckea crassifolia Desert Baeckea Baeckea ericaea Mat baeckea Bertya tasmanica ssp vestita Mitchell’s Bertya Beyeria lechenaultii Mallefowl
    [Show full text]
  • D.Nicolle, Classification of the Eucalypts (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) | 2
    Taxonomy Genus (common name, if any) Subgenus (common name, if any) Section (common name, if any) Series (common name, if any) Subseries (common name, if any) Species (common name, if any) Subspecies (common name, if any) ? = Dubious or poorly-understood taxon requiring further investigation [ ] = Hybrid or intergrade taxon (only recently-described and well-known hybrid names are listed) ms = Unpublished manuscript name Natural distribution (states listed in order from most to least common) WA Western Australia NT Northern Territory SA South Australia Qld Queensland NSW New South Wales Vic Victoria Tas Tasmania PNG Papua New Guinea (including New Britain) Indo Indonesia TL Timor-Leste Phil Philippines ? = Dubious or unverified records Research O Observed in the wild by D.Nicolle. C Herbarium specimens Collected in wild by D.Nicolle. G(#) Growing at Currency Creek Arboretum (number of different populations grown). G(#)m Reproductively mature at Currency Creek Arboretum. – (#) Has been grown at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive. – (#)m At least one population has been grown to maturity at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive. Synonyms (commonly-known and recently-named synonyms only) Taxon name ? = Indicates possible synonym/dubious taxon D.Nicolle, Classification of the eucalypts (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) | 2 Angophora (apples) E. subg. Angophora ser. ‘Costatitae’ ms (smooth-barked apples) A. subser. Costatitae, E. ser. Costatitae Angophora costata subsp. euryphylla (Wollemi apple) NSW O C G(2)m A. euryphylla, E. euryphylla subsp. costata (smooth-barked apple, rusty gum) NSW,Qld O C G(2)m E. apocynifolia Angophora leiocarpa (smooth-barked apple) Qld,NSW O C G(1) A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecology Mnes Assessment Bmc Dragline Move Project
    TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY MNES ASSESSMENT BMC DRAGLINE MOVE PROJECT Prepared for Advisian Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd PO Box 1376 CLEVELAND 4163 Specialised ecological knowledge that reduces your risk Document Control Sheet File Number: 0402-007 Project Manager/s: Dr Lindsay Popple Client: Advisian on behalf of BHP Billiton Mitsui Coal Project Title: BMC Dragline Move Project Terrestrial Ecology MNES Assessment Project Author/s: Dr Lindsay Popple, Dr Penn Lloyd, Jedd Appleton, Lauren Thorburn (ESP) and Paulette Jones. Project Summary: An assessment of terrestrial ecology Matters of National Environmental Significance associated with the BMC Dragline Move Project corridor between Goonyella and South Walker Creek Mines north-east of Moranbah. Draft Preparation History: Draft No. Date draft Reviewed by Issued by completed 0402-007 Draft A 19/09/2016 Paulette Jones Paulette Jones 0402-007 Draft B 23/09/2016 Jedd Appleton Paulette Jones Revision/ Checking History Track: Version Date of Issue Checked by Issued by 0402-007 Version 0 30/09/2016 Paulette Jones Lindsay Popple Document Distribution: Destination Revision 1 Date 2 Date 3 Date 4 Date Dispatched Dispatched Dispatched Dispatched Client Copy 1 - A 19/09/2016 B 23/09/2016 0 30/09/2016 digital Client Copy 1- hard copy PDF - server A 19/09/2016 B 23/09/2016 0 30/09/2016 PDF – backup – A 19/09/2016 B 23/09/2016 0 30/09/2016 archived Hard Copy -library BAAM Pty Ltd File No. 0402-007 Draft B NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS REPORT Copyright and reproduction This report and all indexes, schedules, annexures or appendices are subject to copyright pursuant to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Wimmera, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Thèse 11.11.19
    THESE PRESENTEE ET PUBLIQUEMENT SOUTENUE DEVANT LA FACULTE DE PHARMACIE DE MARSEILLE LE LUNDI 25 NOVEMBRE 2019 PAR MME ERAU Pauline Né(e) le 6 octobre 1989 à Avignon EN VUE D’OBTENIR LE DIPLOME D’ETAT DE DOCTEUR EN PHARMACIE L’EUCALYPTUS : BOTANIQUE, COMPOSITION CHIMIQUE, UTILISATION THÉRAPEUTIQUE ET CONSEIL À L’OFFICINE JURY : Président : Pr OLLIVIER Evelyne, Professeur en Pharmacognosie, Ethnopharmacologie et Homéopathie Membres : Dr BAGHDIKIAN Béatrice, Maitre de conférences en Pharmacognosie, Ethnopharmacologie et Homéopathie M VENTRE Mathieu , Pharmacien d’officine 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Remerciements Je remercie toutes les personnes qui m’ont aidé pendant l’élabo ration de ma thèse et plus particulièrement les personnes qui font partie du jury de soutenance : - Ma directrice de thèse Madame Badghdikian Béatrice pour son intérêt ses conseils durant la rédaction et la correction de ma thèse, - Madame Ollivier Evelyne, Professeur en Pharmacognosie, Ethnopharmacologie et Homéopathie d’av oir accepté de présider ce jury, - Monsieur Ventre Mathieu pour sa patience après toutes ces années et la confiance que vous m’accordez. 9 Je remercie également de manière plus personnelle toutes les personnes qui m’ont entourée ces dernières années : - Sylvain, qui a tout fait pour m’aider, qui m’a soutenu et surtout supporté dans tout ce que j’ai entrepris, - Alexandre, qui a su, à sa manière, patienter pendant les longues heures de relecture de ce document, - Mes p arents et mes sœurs pour leur soutien depuis toujours , - Un grand merci aussi à toute l’équipe de la pharmacie Ventre : Mme Ventre, Virginie et (par ordre alphabétique) Céline, Jennifer, Marie, Marion, Maryline, Perrine et Virginie qui me supportent au quotidien, - Je remercie toutes les personnes avec qui j’ai partagé mes études et que je suis ravie de revoir après toutes ces années : Jean-Luc, Paul, Elsa, Loïc, Michael, Marion… 10 « L’Université n’entend donner aucune approbat ion, ni improbation aux opinions émises dans les thèses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palatability, and Potential Toxicity of Australian Weeds to Goats
    1 The palatability, and potential toxicity of Australian weeds to goats Helen Simmonds, Peter Holst, Chris Bourke 2 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 AUSTRALIA © 2000 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation All rights reserved. The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. National Library of Australia Cataloguing in Publication entry: Simmonds, Helen. The palatability, and potential toxicity of Australian weeds to goats. New ed. Includes index. ISBN 0 7347 1216 2 1. Weeds-goats-toxicity-palatability-Australia. i. Holst, Peter. ii. Bourke, Chris. iii. Title. 3 CONTENTS Page Preface i A comment on weed control ii The potential toxicity of weeds to goats.....................................1 Weeds - thought to be highly or moderately toxic to goats ........5 - thought to have low toxicity to goats..........................90 The palatability of weeds to goats..........................................138 The botanical name for weeds listed by their common name 142 The common name for some Australian weeds .....................147 Table of herbicide groups ......................................................151 Further reading .......................................................................152
    [Show full text]