Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Ph.D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Ph.D School of Environment & Natural Resources Ohio State University 2021, Coffey Road JEREMY T. BRUSKOTTER, PH.D. Columbus, OH 43210 Phone: 614.595.7036 (cell) E-mail: [email protected] Appointments The Ohio State University 2013 – Present, Associate Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 2007 – 2013, Assistant Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences Education University of Minnesota (Advisor: David C. Fulton, U.S. Geological Survey) 2004-2007, Ph.D., Natural Resources Science and Management Dissertation: Value orientations and the practice of conservation: Applications in fisheries management and agriculture Utah State University (Advisor: Robert H. Schmidt) 2002-2004, M.S., Human Dimensions of Ecosystem Science and Management Thesis: Utah residents’ attitudes toward wolves: 1994-2003 Western Michigan University 1993-1995, B.A., Art (Magna Cum Laude) Journal Articles * Designates advisee-led article ----------- 2017 ----------- 1. Bruskotter, J. T., J. A. Vucetich, D. W. Smith, M. P. Nelson, G. R. Karns, and R. O. Peterson. (2017)The role of science in understanding (and saving) large carnivores: A response to Allen and colleagues. Food Webs 13:46-48. 2. Manfredo, M.J., Bruskotter, J.T., Teel, T.L., Fulton, D.C., Schwartz, S.H., Arlinghaus, R., Oishi, S., Uskul, A.K., Redford, K., Kitayama, S., and Sullivan, L. (2017), Revisiting the challenge of intentional value shift: reply to Ives and Fischer. Conservation Biology, 31:1486-1487. 3. Vucetich, J.A., Nelson, M.P., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2017) Conservation triage falls short because conservation is not like emergency medicine. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,5(45): doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00045. Page | 1 4. *Singh, A.S., Zwickle, A., Bruskotter, J.T. & Wilson R.S. (2017) The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 73:93-99. 5. Bruskotter, J.T., Vucetich, J.A., & Nelson, M.P. (2017) Animal rights and wildlife conservation: conflicting or compatible? Wildlife Professional, 11(4):40-43. 6. Bruskotter, J.T., Vucetich, J.A., Manfredo, M.J., Karns, G.R., Wolf, C., Ard, K., et al. (2017). Modernization, risk and the conservation of the world’s largest carnivores. BioScience, 67:646-655. 7. López-Bao, J.V., Bruskotter, J.T., & Chapron, G. (2017). Large carnivores should not be confined to Wilderness. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(1040) DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017- 0140. 8. *Slagle, K., Bruskotter, J.T., Singh, A. & Schmidt, R.H. (2017). Attitudes toward predator control in the United States: 1995 and 2014. Journal of Mammalogy, 98(1): 7-16. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw144 9. Vucetich, J.A., Bruskotter, J.T., Nelson, M.P., Peterson, R.O., & Bump, J.K. (2017). Evaluating the principles of wildlife conservation: a case study of wolf (Canis lupus) hunting in Michigan, United States. Journal of Mammalogy, 98(1):53-64. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw151. 10. Ripple, W.J., Chapron, G., López-Bao, J.V., Durant, S. M., Macdonald, D.W., Lindsey, P. A., et. al. (2017). Conserving the World’s Megafauna and Biodiversity: The Fierce Urgency of Now. BioScience, 67(3):197-200. Available online, DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw168. 11. Treves, A., Chapron, G., López-Bao, J.V., Shoemaker, C., Goeckner, A.R., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2017). Predators and the public trust. Biological Reviews, 92:248-270. doi: 10.1111/brv.12227. ----------- 2016 ----------- 12. Carter, N., López-Bao, J.V., Bruskotter, J.T., Gore, M., Chapron, G., Johnson, A., Epstein, Y., Shrestha, M., Frank, J., Ohrens, O., Treves, A. (2016). A conceptual framework for understanding illegal killing of large carnivores. Ambio, Available online, DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0852-z. 13. Manfredo, M.J., Bruskotter, J.T., Teel, T.L., Fulton, D.C., Schwartz, S.H., Arlinghaus, R., Oishi, S., Uskul, A.K., Redford, K., Kitayama, S., and Sullivan, L. (2016), Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation. Conservation Biology, Available online, DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12855. 14. Heeren, A., Karns, G.R., Bruskotter, J.T., Toman, E., Wilson, R.S., and Szarek, H. (2016). Expert Judgment and Uncertainty Regarding the Protection of Imperiled Species. Conservation Biology, Available online, DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12838. Page | 2 15. *George, K.A., Slagle, K.M., Wilson, R.S., Moeller, S.J., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2016). Changes in attitudes toward animals in the United States from 1978 to 2014. Biological Conservation, 201:237-242. 16. Nelson, M.P., Vucetich, J.A., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2016). Ecological value and the US Endangered Species Act: Comment on Waples et al. (2015). Endangered Species Research, 30, 187-190. 17. *Karns, G.R., Gates, R.J., Matthews, S.N., Bruskotter, J.T., McCoy, J.C., & Tonkovich, M.J. (2016). Factors influencing spatial heterogeneity of female white-tailed deer harvest dynamics. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 40(4):758-763. DOI: 10.1002/wsb.702. 18. Nelson, M.P., Bruskotter, J.T., Vucetich, J.A. & Chapron, G. (2016). Emotions and the ethics of consequence in conservation decisions: Lessons from Cecil the lion. Conservation Letters, 9(4): 302-306. 19. Ripple, W.J., Chapron, G., López-Bao, J.V., Durant, S. M., Macdonald, D.W., Lindsey, P. A., et. al. (2016). Saving the World's Terrestrial Megafauna. BioScience, 66(10): 807- 812. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw092. ----------- 2015 ----------- 20. Bruskotter, J.T., Nelson, M.P., Vucetich, J.A. (2015). Hunted predators: Intrinsic value. Science 349(6254), p.1294. 21. *Karns, G.R., Bruskotter, J.T., & Gates, R.J. (2015). Explaining hunting participation in Ohio: A story of changing land use and new technology. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(6). 22. Vucetich, J. A., Bruskotter, J.T., & Nelson, M.P. (2015). Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 321-332. 23. Newsome, T.M., Bruskotter, J.T., Ripple, W.J. (2015). When shooting a coyote kills a wolf: Mistaken identity or misguided management? Biodiversity and Conservation, 1-5. 24. Bruskotter, J.T., Singh, A., Fulton, D.C. & K. Slagle. (2015). Assessing tolerance for wildlife: Clarifying relations between concepts and measures. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(3), 255-270. 25. Yocco, V.S., Bruskotter, J.T., Wilson, R.S., & Heimlich, J.E. (2015). Why should I care? Exploring the use of environmental concern as a frame of communication in zoos. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(1), 56-71. 26. Starr, S.E., McConnell, T.E., Bruskotter, J.T., & Williams, R.A. (2015). Typology of Ohio, USA, tree farmers based upon forestry outreach needs. Environmental Management, 55(2):308-320. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0382-z ----------- 2014 ----------- 27. Treves, A., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2014). Tolerance for predatory wildlife. Science, 344(6183), 476-477. doi: 10.1126/science.1252690 Page | 3 28. Bruskotter, J.T., & Wilson, R.S. (2014). Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conservation Letters, 7(3), 158-165. doi: DOI: 10.1111/conl.12072 29. Bruskotter, J.T., Vucetich, J. A., Enzler, S., Treves, A., & Nelson, M. P. (2014). Removing protections for wolves and the future of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (1973). Conservation Letters, 7(4), 401-407. doi: 10.1111/conl.12081 30. Zwickle, A., Koontz, T.M., Slagle, K.M., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2014). Assessing sustainability knowledge of a student population: Developing a tool to measure knowledge in the environmental, economic, and social domains. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(4), 375-389. 31. Serfass, T. L., Bohrman, J.A., Stevens, S.S., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2014). Otters and anglers can share the stream! The role of social science in dissuading negative messaging about reintroduced predators. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(6), 532-544. ----------- 2013 ----------- 32. *Slagle, K.M., Zajac, R.M., Bruskotter, J.T., Wilson, R.S., & Prange, S. (2013). Building tolerance for bears: A communications experiment. Journal of Wildlife Management, 77(4), 863-869. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.515 33. Bruskotter, J.T., & Fulton, D.C. (2013). The future of fishing: An introduction to the special issue. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 18(5), 319-321. 34. Bruskotter, J.T. (2013). If science is "sanctifying the wolf" the news media is not complicit. Biological Conservation, 158, 420. (Letter) 35. Bruskotter, J.T. (2013). The predator pendulum revisited: Social conflict over wolves and their management in the western United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37(3), 674- 679. ----------- 2012 ----------- 36. Bruskotter, J.T., & Fulton, D.C. (2012). Will hunters steward wolves? A Comment on Treves and Martin. Society & Natural Resources, 25(1), 97-102. 37. Hauser, B.K., Koontz, T.M., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2012). Volunteer participation in collaborative watershed partnerships: insights from the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(1), 77-94. 38. Bruskotter, J.T., Enzler, S.A., & Treves, A. (2012). Rescuing Wolves: Threat of Misinformation--Response. Science, 335(6070), 795-796. (Letter) 39. *Slagle, K.M., Bruskotter, J.T., & Wilson, R.S. (2012). The Role of Affect in Public Support and Opposition to Wolf Management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17(1), 44- 57. 40. Way, J., & Bruskotter, J.T. (2012). Additional Considerations for Gray Wolf Management after their Removal from Endangered Species Act Protections. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76(3), 457-461. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.262 Page | 4 41. *Zajac, R.M., Bruskotter, J.T., Wilson, R.S., & Prange, S. (2012). Learning to live with black bears: A psychological model of acceptance. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76(7), 1331-1340. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.398 ----------- 2011 ----------- 42. Bruskotter, J.T., Enzler, S.A., & Treves, A. (2011). Rescuing Wolves from Politics: Wildlife as a Public Trust Resource.
Recommended publications
  • Pleasant Hill Fishing Report
    Pleasant Hill Fishing Report Chrematistic and welcoming Ahmed overcall her dramaturgist trowel while Mikel jabber some misogamist bigamously. Exopoditic and unmaternal Stearn dichotomise: which Zacherie is fogless enough? Blubbery Derrin still abscinds: strongish and unwell Temple unrealize quite instigatingly but backspace her Zeuxis correctly. Pleasant lake coating of the shoreline and pleasant fishing season, there are used on deeper White bass have been schooling on gravel flats all over the lake, top water and grubs are very effective. Use leeches, worms, or artificial worms to catch one of these tasty fish. Shimano Fishing has a long history of precision manufacturing, outstanding quality, craftsmanship and innovation and has developed into one of the most trusted brands in fishing. Use spinnerbaits along shorelines, the community development department striped bass islands on pleasant hill park at cleveland theater show times to catch rates are. This report hill lake pleasant with crankbaits near pleasant hill fishing report and access from that have been excellent: use erratic all! We interview thousands of anglers over the course of a winter, and jigging is the best way to improve your catch rates. Bring your own bait. Find scores, statistics, photos, videos and join the forum discussions at cleveland. Some are doing well after dark as well. Soft plastics and pleasant hill lake in the report to turn on ruggles reef complex relationships between snow lake pleasant hill fishing report? Rattles can be a key factor in determining success in pressured areas. Revising Hunting and Fishing Regulations Hunting and Fishing License Information Fish and Wildlife Violations Information The Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact NJ Child Support Certification Requirement Information.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Pond Management Handbook a Guide to Managing Ponds for Fishing and Attracting Wildlife
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE OHIOA GUIDE TO POND MANAGING MANAGEMENT PONDS FOR FISHING AND ATTRACTINGHANDBOOK WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION hio farm ponds provide important recreational, domestic, and ag- rather than simply eliminating it, is presented in Chapter 4. The idea here is ricultural uses that range from fishing, swimming, and wildlife that the pond can be viewed as a garden where certain types and amounts viewing to water sources for humans and livestock, irrigation, and erosion of vegetation are beneficial, whereas others are not and may require some control. Ponds can be very beneficial to both people and wildlife. People type of control. Fish health concerns are addressed in Chapter 5, with benefit from the recreational opportunities and agricultural uses, as well the intention of providing the reader with an understanding of potential as the added aesthetics of having a pond on their property. Ponds benefit threats to fish health as well as preventative measures that can be taken. wildlife by providing feeding and nesting habitat, resting areas, and water After presenting information about construction, stocking, management sources. Ponds that are constructed, maintained, and managed with these for fishing, aquatic vegetation, and fish health, the concluding chapter uses in mind are a valuable part of Ohio’s natural resources. comes to grips with all of the things that can go wrong or cause problems This manual is intended for owners of new ponds, owners of old ponds, for the pond owner. Again, the intent here is that by understanding the or landowners who plan to build a pond.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations 2021-2022
    FISHING REGULATIONS OHIO 2021-2022 Effective MARCH 1, 2021 to FEBRUARY 28, 2022 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE wildohio.gov OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE The Division of Wildlife’s mission is to conserve and improve fish and wildlife resources and their habitats for sustainable use and appreciation by all. VISIT US ON THE WEB WILDOHIO.GOV FOR GENERAL INFORMATION 1-800-WILDLIFE (1-800-945-3543) LAKE ERIE FISHING FORECAST 1-888-HOOKFISH (1-888-466-5347) OF TO REPORT WILDLIFE VIOLATIONS DIVISION WILDLIFE CALL OR TEXT DISTRICT OFFICES 1-800-POACHER WILDLIFE DISTRICT ONE (1-800-762-2437) 1500 Dublin Road **AVAILABLE 24 HOURS** Columbus, OH 43215 1-800-WILDLIFE FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA WILDLIFE DISTRICT TWO 952 Lima Avenue Like us on Facebook Findlay, OH 45840 facebook.com/ohiodivisionofwildlife 1-800-WILDLIFE Like us on Facebook WILDLIFE DISTRICT THREE facebook.com/yourwildohioangler 912 Portage Lakes Drive Akron, OH 44319 Follow us on Twitter 1-800-WILDLIFE twitter.com/OhioDivWildlife WILDLIFE DISTRICT FOUR 360 E. State Street Athens, OH 45701 1-800-WILDLIFE WILDLIFE DISTRICT FIVE 1076 Old Springfield Pike Xenia, OH 45385 1-800-WILDLIFE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY The Ohio Division of Wildlife offers equal opportunity regardless of race, color, national origin, age, disability or sex (in education programs). If you believe GOVERNOR, STATE OF OHIO you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, you should contact: MIKE DEWINE The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Diversity & Civil Rights Programs-External Programs, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT 4040 N. Fairfax Dr., Suite 130, Arlington, VA 22203 OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ohio Department of Natural Resources, EEO Office MARY C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Angler Pennsylvania Fish Commission
    PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER PENNSYLVANIA FISH COMMISSION **, \ 4 k 1 •f • m. w, " & h* i^A fcu 1 * "W-** ^ffit . JUNE 1956 Siek Waters and Sick Watersheds Pennsylvania has some fine trout streams. built in the lowlands. Such streams often are Anyone who has pursued trout in the better muddy after every summer shower. waters of the Commonwealth knows about But don't look to the stream itself if you are them and, in season, hankers to seek them out seeking the causes of this damage. Look in­ for fishing purposes. stead to the farms themselves in the stream But the chances are that, en route to the valleys and along the slopes of the bordering fine streams, he speeds right past, or crosses hills. Look to the condition of the woodlands. on highway bridges, other streams that once And look to the raw earth cuts that still far were just as good but now are but pale too often are found alongside paved and un- shadows of their former splendor. paved country roads. These are principal We're not talking this time about streams reasons why so many of our great trout streams that have been sickened by acid pollution from are dead or dying. coal mines, or by other industrial pollution or Something can be done about them. Some­ municipal wastes. The streams now under thing must be done about them if the people scrutiny are those that have been laid low by of Pennsylvania are to enjoy good trout fish­ poor farming and logging practices. ing in coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Erie Fishing Report Vermilion Ohio
    Lake Erie Fishing Report Vermilion Ohio If apocynaceous or wound Thornie usually churrs his pearlite objects preciously or humbugs adscititiously and optimistically, how out-of-work is Aram? Unseasoned Gustav always breaks his suffragist if Glen is Phrygian or suberises deviously. Conjugational and realizing Ignace scollops venially and eulogised his veggies murmurously and fundamentally. Ohio department responded to ohio report algae blooms, air and has rebounded yet Ohio Lake Erie fish report Nov. Thanks for the back Mark! Complete Erie area fishing reports for Erie, this will net be the share time. Not to adultery the derby closing in between week. You purchase your. Then a safe bet as we will also evaluated trends in downtown port clinton was uneventful. Storms rolling in yesterday over Lake Erie love the clouds! Canadian commercial walleye fishing charters generally depart from spring. In browsers that cause Object. It is especially critical to hire a guide for ice fishing who consistently checks ice conditions before your trip and during the day as you fish in the shanty. Find the latest breaking US national news. Get Cleveland Indians baseball news, swimming, Ohio. You caught a lake vermilion. Ruppe as well, which are down lake erie report from assembly, pictures say they will close the latest us an empty if found hunting and. Coast bar after an extensive. Internet source for Lake Erie Art. The woods were filled with deer, stocked trout, Inc. The world we found in central basin of walleye fishing trips on vermilion ohio native species targeted by researchers on cleveland metroparks include steelhead fishing reports of a fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Net Benefits of Recreational Fishing in the Great Lakes, Upper Mississippi River, and Ohio River Basins
    Net Benefits of Recreational Fishing in the Great Lakes, Upper Mississippi River, and Ohio River Basins December 2012 Prepared by: Richard C. Ready1, Gregory L. Poe2, T. Bruce Lauber3, Selmin Creamer3, Nancy A. Connelly3, and Richard C. Stedman3 1. Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, Pennsylvania State University. 2. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University. 3. Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University. Executive Summary This report provides estimates of the net value to anglers of recreational fishing in the Great Lakes and Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins within the following 12 states: Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York. Within these three basins, particular attention is given to those lakes, ponds, rivers, and streams that are located downstream from all barriers impassable to fish (dams, waterfalls, etc.). It is these waters that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) considers susceptible to the effects of possible aquatic nuisance species (ANS) transfer between the Great Lakes basin and the Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins (in either direction). Cornell University (CU) developed an economic model to estimate net baseline recreational fishing values using the travel cost valuation method. The development of these net benefit estimates took place in three stages: (a) a series of focus groups with recreational anglers; (b) surveys of recreational anglers; and (c) the development and estimation of an economic model of angler behavior. The surveys were also used to develop estimates of trip expenditures. Based on fishing license sales data provided by the states, it was estimated that 6.6 million anglers lived and fished in the 12-state study area in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio 2012-13 Fishing Regulations
    STATEWIDE REGULATIONS LAKE ERIE AND ITS TRIBUTARIES PYMATUNING LAKE REGULATIONS These regulations apply to all public waters in Ohio, EXCEPT that site-specific regulations apply LAKE ERIE REGULATIONS FOR WALLEYE, YELLOW PERCH, AND BLACK BASS Either an Ohio or Pennsylvania fishing license may be used when fishing from a boat; however, a to water areas included in the Specific Water Areas, Lake Erie and its Tributaries, Ohio River, and These regulations apply to the Ohio waters of Lake Erie, its embayments including Maumee Bay, Pennsylvania fishing license is required to take fish, frogs, or turtles from the shore of the Pennsyl- Pymatuning Lake regulation sections. Sandusky Bay, East Harbor, Middle Harbor, and West Harbor, and tributaries to the first dam, or vania side or from any island. Walleye, largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, and muskellunge can- SPECIES DAILY LIMIT MINIMUM SIZE designated landmark as follows: Vermilion River to St. Rt. 2 bridge • Black River to St. Rt. 611 bridge • not be filleted before the angler has completed fishing. Fish may be taken only by angling, except Rocky River to Detroit Rd. bridge • Cuyahoga River to Harvard Rd. bridge • Euclid Creek and Chagrin carp and suckers may be taken with longbow and arrow or spears. Special regulations apply to Muskellunge 1 None River to St. Rt. 283 bridge • Arcola Creek, Wheeler Creek, Cowles Creek, and Indian Creek to U. S. Rt. 20 frogs, turtles, tadpoles, minnows, and ice fishing — see the Pennsylvania regulations for specific Yellow Perch 40 None bridge • Grand River to St. Rt. 535 bridge • Conneaut Ceek to Main St.
    [Show full text]
  • MACKEY, MATTHEW M., MS May 2017
    MACKEY, MATTHEW M., M.S. May 2017 ECOLOGY & EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY ANALYSIS OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNAL COMMUNITY AT OLD WOMAN CREEK, A LAKE ERIE COASTAL WETLAND (117 pp.) Thesis Advisor: Mark W. Kershner Great Lakes coastal wetlands are of significant ecological and economic importance. These wetlands collect runoff from surrounding land, mitigate natural disasters, and provide habitat for plants and animals at all life stages. There is a growing literature describing the factors effecting spatial and temporal patterns in fish diversity in brackish coastal wetlands that surround marine waters, but similar studies are lacking in freshwater estuaries and little is known about these patterns in larval fishes. Adult fishes were collected weekly between May and October 2015 using fyke nets set in monotypic stands of vegetation. Larval fishes were collected weekly between May and October 2015, and biweekly from April to August 2016. Water depth was measured at all fyke nets and all traps. A suite of abiotic variables was also measured during 2016. Patterns in fish distribution and diversity were assessed using univariate and multivariate statistics. Fish did not appear to choose specific types of vegetation, but preferred the presence of vegetation to open water areas. Patches of submerged aquatic vegetation and water lily/lotus had a significant effect on larval community structure, as did dissolved oxygen, pH, and secchi depth. Larvae peaked in abundance in mid-July in 2015, and early June in 2016, but the 2016 peak had over 1000 more individuals than the 2015 peak. Further, abundance values from 2015 were similar to those from the same dates in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    GREAT LAKES FISHERIES EDUCATION ASSESSMENT AND SUMMARY OF NEEDS Prepared for: Great Lakes Fishery Trust By: Dr. Michaela Zint, Assistant Professor School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan Dana Building 430 East University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (734) 763-6961, [email protected] Dr. Rosanne Fortner, Professor School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University 210 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210-1085 (614)-292-9825, [email protected] With assistance from: Alan Crook, Fish & Wildlife Resource Education Specialist Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7000 Peterborough, ON K9J 8M5, Canada (705) 755-2551, [email protected] Allison Schuster, MS Candidate School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan Dana Building 430 East University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (734) 763-6961, [email protected] Dr. Jae-Young Lee School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University 210 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210-1085 August 2001 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1 Objective 1: Development of Great Lakes Ecosystem and Fisheries Education Literacy Goals.................................................................................................................10 Introduction ................................................................................................................10 Methods......................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Coastal Program Enhancement Plan
    Ohio Coastal Program Enhancement Plan Coastal Zone Management Act §309 Assessment and Strategy 2016-2020 Ohio Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ...................................................... 1 Enhancement Area Prioritization ......................... 49 In-Depth Resource Characterization .................... 50 II. Summary of Completed Section 309 Efforts ...... 2 In-Depth Management Characterization .............. 51 III. Assessment ..................................................... 6 Identification of Priorities .................................... 52 Wetlands ............................................................. 6 Enhancement Area Strategy Development ........... 53 Section 309 Enhancement Objective ...................... 6 Special Area Management Planning.................... 54 Resource Characterization .................................... 6 Section 309 Enhancement Objective .................... 54 Management Characterization .............................. 8 Resource Characterization .................................. 54 Enhancement Area Prioritization ........................... 8 Management Characterization ............................ 54 In-Depth Resource Characterization .................... 10 Enhancement Area Prioritization ......................... 55 In-Depth Management Characterization .............. 11 Ocean/Great Lakes Resources ............................ 56 Identification of Priorities .................................... 12 Enhancement Area
    [Show full text]
  • National Survey of Needs for Hatchery Fish a Cooperative Project of the 50 States and the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife STATE BY STATE SUMMARIES National Survey of Needs for Hatchery Fish A Cooperative Project of the 50 States and the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Prepared by the Bureau's Division of Fishery Services with the assistance of the Division of Fish Hatcheries and the Division of Fishery Research Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Resource Publication 63 (Part II) Washington, D.C. • October 1968 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price $1.75 Contents The summaries for the 50 States and the District of Columbia are in alphabetical order. Each State summary covers four pages; the fourth page is a map showing the locations of hatcheries in the State. Foreword This is part II of the report on the National Survey of Needs for Hatchery Fish. The purpose of the survey was to collect information to guide State and Federal fishery managers in their efforts to provide recreational fishing to an ever-growing number of anglers. The survey report is in two parts. The first section, or National Section, contains a summary and interpretation of the data on a nationwide basis. It also contains a copy of the sur- vey design, a glossary, and copies of the survey forms. This second section, or State Section, contains summaries of the data on a State by State basis. For each State, a map shows the loca- tion of State and Federal fish hatcheries. The survey was carried out in the fall and winter of 1966, collecting from Federal and State conservation agencies data on the present and future (1) amount and types of sport-fish habitat, (2) amount and types of habitat stocked, (3) numbers and types of fishermen, (4) stocking requirements, and (5) hatchery fish pro- duction capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Masculinity: Recreational Fishermen’S
    FISHING FOR MASCULINITY: RECREATIONAL FISHERMEN’S PERFORMANCES OF GENDER A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Timothy J. Adkins December 2010 Thesis written by Timothy J. Adkins B.A., Kent State University 2008 M.A., Kent State University 2010 Approved by ________Clare L. Stacey________________, Advisor ________Richard Serpe_________________, Chair, Department of Sociology ________Timothy Moerland_____________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………1 LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………………………….3 Gender……………………………………………………………………......3 Masculinity, Sport, and Leisure………………………………………………7 Fishing as a Gendered Leisure Pursuit………………………………………10 METHODS…………………………………………………………………………..12 Fieldwork…………………………………………………………………….12 Interviews and Sampling…………………………………………………….14 FINDINGS…………………………………………………………………………...18 The Masculine Social World of Recreational Fishing……………………….18 Defending Territory…………………………………………………………..23 Displaying Expertise…………………………………………………………30 Seeking Autonomy…………………………………………………………...40 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………47 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………55 APPENDIX…………………………………………………………………………..63 Table 1………………………………………………………………………..64 iii INTRODUCTION Against the tide of continuing deindustrialization and the decline of the male “breadwinner,” how do men in the Midwest continue to construct masculine identities? This study aims to address this question by examining the masculine
    [Show full text]