Gustav Creek, Magnetic Island

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gustav Creek, Magnetic Island Final Report CATCHMENT STUDY – GUSTAV CREEK, MAGNETIC ISLAND ACTFR Report 00/05 Prepared by A. Cairns, M.Richards and G. Lukacs Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research James Cook University Townsville Qld 4811 Phone: 07 47814262 Fax 07 47815589 Email: [email protected] Catchment Study – Gustav Creek, Magnetic Island. ACTFR Report No. 00/05 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 2 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 3 2 THE STUDY SITE.............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 LOCATION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 POPULATION .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 HISTORY......................................................................................................................................... 6 3 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 TEMPERATURE ............................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 WIND............................................................................................................................................ 10 3.4 CYCLONES.................................................................................................................................... 10 4 OVERVIEW OF GUSTAV CREEK............................................................................................... 12 4.1 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION OVERVIEW.................................................................................. 12 4.2 EXISTING LAND USES .................................................................................................................. 12 4.3 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES................................................................................................... 12 5 TENURE AND CONTROLS........................................................................................................... 13 5.1 MARINE & TIDAL JURISDICTION ................................................................................................. 13 5.2 HARBOUR PROPOSAL ................................................................................................................... 13 5.3 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS....................................................................................................... 14 6 LAND USE ........................................................................................................................................ 15 6.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.2 LAND TENURE.............................................................................................................................. 15 6.2.1 National Park ....................................................................................................................... 15 6.2.2 Freehold and Leasehold Land.............................................................................................. 15 6.2.3 Vacant Crown Land.............................................................................................................. 15 6.3 ZONING ........................................................................................................................................ 18 6.3.1 Planning Schedule................................................................................................................ 18 6.3.2 Current Zoning ..................................................................................................................... 18 6.3.3 Future Zoning....................................................................................................................... 18 6.4 ZONING TYPES.............................................................................................................................. 21 6.4.1 Residential ............................................................................................................................ 21 6.4.2 Industrial .............................................................................................................................. 22 6.4.3 Commercial and Community............................................................................................... 23 6.4.4 Tourist Facilities .................................................................................................................. 24 6.4.5 Non Urban............................................................................................................................ 25 6.4.6 Special Purpose .................................................................................................................... 25 6.5 CONTAMINATED LAND ................................................................................................................ 25 7 HERITAGE ISSUES ........................................................................................................................ 27 7.1 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE............................................................................................................... 27 7.1.1 Artefacts................................................................................................................................ 27 7.1.2 Native Title ........................................................................................................................... 27 7.2 NON ABORIGINAL HERITAGE ...................................................................................................... 27 7.2.1 National Estate ..................................................................................................................... 27 8 FLORA AND FAUNA ...................................................................................................................... 28 8.1 VEGETATION OF THE GUSTAV CREEK CATCHMENT .................................................................... 28 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page i Catchment Study – Gustav Creek, Magnetic Island. ACTFR Report No. 00/05 8.1.1 General description.............................................................................................................. 28 8.1.2 Vulnerable and Endangered species .................................................................................... 28 8.1.3 Conservation status of vegetation communities ................................................................... 30 8.1.4 Gustav Creek riparian vegetation ........................................................................................ 31 8.1.5 Survey ................................................................................................................................... 31 8.1.6 Section descriptions.............................................................................................................. 32 8.1.7 Conservation status of vegetation communities ................................................................... 33 8.1.8 Introduced species ................................................................................................................ 34 8.1.9 Declared plants .................................................................................................................... 34 8.1.10 Weed control......................................................................................................................... 35 8.1.11 Mangroves ............................................................................................................................ 35 8.1.12 Remedial work and future management ............................................................................... 36 8.2 THE FAUNA OF THE GUSTAV CREEK CATCHMENT....................................................................... 36 8.2.1 Birds ..................................................................................................................................... 36 8.2.2 Mammals .............................................................................................................................. 37 8.2.3 Reptiles ................................................................................................................................. 37 8.2.4 Invertebrates......................................................................................................................... 37 9 GEOLOGY, SEDIMENTS AND SOILS ........................................................................................ 38 9.1 GEOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................... 38 9.1.1
Recommended publications
  • Orpower 4 Inc Environmental Impact Assessment Olkaria Iii Geothermal
    0 ORPOWER 4 INC Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OLKARIA III GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by Prof. Mwakio P. Tole and Colleagues School of Environmental Studies Moi University Public Disclosure Authorized P. O. Box 3900 Eldoret, KENYA August, 2000 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Content Page Number 0.0 Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction 25 2.0 Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework 26 3.0 Description of the Proposed Project 28 4.0 Baseline Data 39 5.0 Significant Environmental Impacts 83 6.0 Assessment of Alternatives 100 6.0 Mitigation Measures 105 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 114 8.0 Bibliography 115 9.0 Appendices 122 2 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Page No. Table 1 Noise levels at selected areas around Olkaria West 47 Table 2 Effects of CO2 on Human Health 50 Table 3 Effects of H2S on Human Health 52 Table 4 H2S concentration Frequencies around the Olkaria I field 55 Table 5 Mean Concentrations of Brine in Olkaria Field 60 Table 6 Permissible levels of some heavy metals in drinking water 60 Table 7 Biological impacts of selected metals on human health 61 Table 8. Radiation Exposure Sources in Britain 63 Table 9 Chemical composition of Lake Naivasha waters 65 Table 10 Mammal Census at the Hell’s Gate National Park 72 Table 11 Traffic on Olkaria West–KWS road 84 Table 12 Expected releases of Non-condensable gases into the atmosphere 88 Table 13 Concentrations of H2S in wells at Olkaria III 90 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchOnline at James Cook University Final Report Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale, Melissa George, Rosemary Hill and Duane Fraser Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale1, Melissa George2, Rosemary Hill3 and Duane Fraser 1The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Cairns 2NAILSMA, Darwin 3CSIRO, Cairns Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme Project 3.9: Indigenous capacity building and increased participation in management of Queensland sea country © CSIRO, 2016 Creative Commons Attribution Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? is licensed by CSIRO for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-925088-91-5 This report should be cited as: Dale, A., George, M., Hill, R. and Fraser, D. (2016) Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?. Report to the National Environmental Science Programme. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (50pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) Tropical Water Quality (TWQ) Hub. The Tropical Water Quality Hub is part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme and is administered by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Many Voices Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Languages Action Plan
    Yetimarala Yidinji Yi rawarka lba Yima Yawa n Yir bina ach Wik-Keyangan Wik- Yiron Yam Wik Pa Me'nh W t ga pom inda rnn k Om rungu Wik Adinda Wik Elk Win ala r Wi ay Wa en Wik da ji Y har rrgam Epa Wir an at Wa angkumara Wapabura Wik i W al Ng arra W Iya ulg Y ik nam nh ar nu W a Wa haayorre Thaynakwit Wi uk ke arr thiggi T h Tjung k M ab ay luw eppa und un a h Wa g T N ji To g W ak a lan tta dornd rre ka ul Y kk ibe ta Pi orin s S n i W u a Tar Pit anh Mu Nga tra W u g W riya n Mpalitj lgu Moon dja it ik li in ka Pir ondja djan n N Cre N W al ak nd Mo Mpa un ol ga u g W ga iyan andandanji Margany M litja uk e T th th Ya u an M lgu M ayi-K nh ul ur a a ig yk ka nda ulan M N ru n th dj O ha Ma Kunjen Kutha M ul ya b i a gi it rra haypan nt Kuu ayi gu w u W y i M ba ku-T k Tha -Ku M ay l U a wa d an Ku ayo tu ul g m j a oo M angan rre na ur i O p ad y k u a-Dy K M id y i l N ita m Kuk uu a ji k la W u M a nh Kaantju K ku yi M an U yi k i M i a abi K Y -Th u g r n u in al Y abi a u a n a a a n g w gu Kal K k g n d a u in a Ku owair Jirandali aw u u ka d h N M ai a a Jar K u rt n P i W n r r ngg aw n i M i a i M ca i Ja aw gk M rr j M g h da a a u iy d ia n n Ya r yi n a a m u ga Ja K i L -Y u g a b N ra l Girramay G al a a n P N ri a u ga iaba ithab a m l j it e g Ja iri G al w i a t in M i ay Giy L a M li a r M u j G a a la a P o K d ar Go g m M h n ng e a y it d m n ka m np w a i- u t n u i u u u Y ra a r r r l Y L a o iw m I a a G a a p l u i G ull u r a d e a a tch b K d i g b M g w u b a M N n rr y B thim Ayabadhu i l il M M u i a a
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography and Biotic Assembly of Indo-Pacific Corvoid Passerine Birds
    ES48CH11-Jonsson ARI 9 October 2017 7:38 Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Biogeography and Biotic Assembly of Indo-Pacific Corvoid Passerine Birds Knud Andreas Jønsson,1 Michael Krabbe Borregaard,1 Daniel Wisbech Carstensen,1 Louis A. Hansen,1 Jonathan D. Kennedy,1 Antonin Machac,1 Petter Zahl Marki,1,2 Jon Fjeldsa˚,1 and Carsten Rahbek1,3 1Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway 3Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2017. 48:231–53 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on Corvides, diversity assembly, evolution, island biogeography, Wallacea August 11, 2017 The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Abstract Systematics is online at ecolsys.annualreviews.org The archipelagos that form the transition between Asia and Australia were https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316- immortalized by Alfred Russel Wallace’s observations on the connections 022813 between geography and animal distributions, which he summarized in Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. what became the first major modern biogeographic synthesis. Wallace All rights reserved traveled the island region for eight years, during which he noted the marked Access provided by Copenhagen University on 11/19/17. For personal use only. faunal discontinuity across what has later become known as Wallace’s Line. Wallace was intrigued by the bewildering diversity and distribution of Annu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of Pooh Corner Bushland Reserve Species Recorded 2005
    The Birds of Pooh Megapodes Ibis & Spoonbills Cockatoos & Corellas (cont'd). Australian Brush-turkey Australian White Ibis Yellow-tailed Black- Corner Bushland Pheasants & Quail Straw-necked Ibis Cockatoo Reserve Brown Quail Eagles, Kites, Goshawks & Parrots, Lorikeets & Rosellas Species recorded Ducks, Geese & Swans Osprey Rainbow Lorikeet Australian Wood Duck Black-shouldered Kite Scaly-breasted Lorikeet 2005 - Nov. 2014 Pacific Black Duck Pacific Baza Little Lorikeet Pigeons & Doves Collared Sparrowhawk Australian King-Parrot Summary: Brown Cuckoo-Dove Whistling Kite Pale-headed Rosella 127 species total - Common Bronzewing Black Kite Cuckoos (a) 118 species recorded by Crested Pigeon Brown Goshawk Australian Koel formal survey 2012-14 Peaceful Dove Grey Goshawk Pheasant Coucal (b) 6 species recorded since Bar-shouldered Dove Wedge-tailed Eagle Channel-billed Cuckoo survey began but not on Rock Dove White-bellied Sea-eagle(Px1) Horsfield's Bronze-Cuckoo formal survey Frogmouths Falcons Shining Bronze-Cuckoo (c) 3 species recorded prior to Tawny Frogmouth Australian Hobby Little Bronze-Cuckoo and not yet since Birdlife Owlet-Nightjars Crakes, Rails & Swamphens Fan-tailed Cuckoo Southern Queensland survey Australian Owlet-nightjar Purple Swamphen Brush Cuckoo began in Sept. 2012. Swifts & Swiftlets Dusky Moorhen Hawk-Owls White-throated Needletail Plovers, Dotterels & Lapwings Powerful Owl (WACC pre- Legend: Cormorants & Shags Masked Lapwing survey) Px1= private once only record -ie Little Black Cormorant Snipe, Sandpipers et al Masked
    [Show full text]
  • Printable PDF Format
    Field Guides Tour Report Australia Part 2 2019 Oct 22, 2019 to Nov 11, 2019 John Coons & Doug Gochfeld For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Water is a precious resource in the Australian deserts, so watering holes like this one near Georgetown are incredible places for concentrating wildlife. Two of our most bird diverse excursions were on our mornings in this region. Photo by guide Doug Gochfeld. Australia. A voyage to the land of Oz is guaranteed to be filled with novelty and wonder, regardless of whether we’ve been to the country previously. This was true for our group this year, with everyone coming away awed and excited by any number of a litany of great experiences, whether they had already been in the country for three weeks or were beginning their Aussie journey in Darwin. Given the far-flung locales we visit, this itinerary often provides the full spectrum of weather, and this year that was true to the extreme. The drought which had gripped much of Australia for months on end was still in full effect upon our arrival at Darwin in the steamy Top End, and Georgetown was equally hot, though about as dry as Darwin was humid. The warmth persisted along the Queensland coast in Cairns, while weather on the Atherton Tablelands and at Lamington National Park was mild and quite pleasant, a prelude to the pendulum swinging the other way. During our final hours below O’Reilly’s, a system came through bringing with it strong winds (and a brush fire warning that unfortunately turned out all too prescient).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Australia Part Ii: Queensland, Victoria & Plains-Wanderer
    GRAND AUSTRALIA PART II: QUEENSLAND, VICTORIA & PLAINS-WANDERER OCTOBER 15–NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Southern Cassowary LEADER: DION HOBCROFT LIST COMPILED BY: DION HOBCROFT VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM GRAND AUSTRALIA PART II By Dion Hobcroft Few birds are as brilliant (in an opposite complementary fashion) as a male Australian King-parrot. On Part II of our Grand Australia tour, we were joined by six new participants. We had a magnificent start finding a handsome male Koala in near record time, and he posed well for us. With friend Duncan in the “monster bus” named “Vince,” we birded through the Kerry Valley and the country towns of Beaudesert and Canungra. Visiting several sites, we soon racked up a bird list of some 90 species with highlights including two Black-necked Storks, a Swamp Harrier, a Comb-crested Jacana male attending recently fledged chicks, a single Latham’s Snipe, colorful Scaly-breasted Lorikeets and Pale-headed Rosellas, a pair of obliging Speckled Warblers, beautiful Scarlet Myzomela and much more. It had been raining heavily at O’Reilly’s for nearly a fortnight, and our arrival was exquisitely timed for a break in the gloom as blue sky started to dominate. Pretty-faced Wallaby was a good marsupial, and at lunch we were joined by a spectacular male Eastern Water Dragon. Before breakfast we wandered along the trail system adjacent to the lodge and were joined by many new birds providing unbelievable close views and photographic chances. Wonga Pigeon and Bassian Thrush were two immediate good sightings followed closely by Albert’s Lyrebird, female Paradise Riflebird, Green Catbird, Regent Bowerbird, Australian Logrunner, three species of scrubwren, and a male Rose Robin amongst others.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Responses to Palm Island in the 1920S and 1930S1
    ‘Socialist paradise’ or ‘inhospitable island’? Visitor responses to Palm Island in the 1920s and 1930s1 Toby Martin Tourists visiting Queensland’s Palm Island in the 1920s and 1930s followed a well-beaten path. They were ferried there in a launch, either from a larger passenger ship moored in deeper water, or from Townsville on the mainland. Having made it to the shallows, tourists would be carried ‘pick a back’ by a ‘native’ onto a ‘palm-shaded’ beach. Once on the grassy plains that stood back from the beach, they would be treated to performances such as corroborees, war dances and spear-throwing. They were also shown the efforts of the island’s administration: schools full of happy children, hospitals brimming with bonny babies, brass band performances and neat, tree-fringed streets with European- style gardens. Before being piggy-backed to their launches, the tourist could purchase authentic souvenirs, such as boomerangs and shields. As the ship pulled away from paradise, tourists could gaze back and reflect on this model Aboriginal settlement, its impressive ‘native displays’, its ‘efficient management’ and the ‘noble work’ of its staff and missionaries.2 By the early 1920s, the Palm Island Aboriginal reserve had become a major Queensland tourist destination. It offered tourists – particularly those from the southern states or from overseas – a chance to see Aboriginal people and culture as part of a comfortable day trip. Travellers to and around Australia had taken a keen interest in Aboriginal culture and its artefacts since Captain Cook commented on the ‘rage for curiosities amongst his crew’.3 From the 1880s, missions such as Lake Tyers in Victoria’s Gippsland region had attracted 1 This research was undertaken with the generous support of the State Library of NSW David Scott Mitchell Fellowship, and the ‘Touring the Past: History and Tourism in Australia 1850-2010’ ARC grant, with Richard White.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis of Thea Astley's the Multiple Effects of Rainshadow
    The Genesis of Thea Astley’s The Multiple Effects of Rainshadow CHERYL TAYLOR JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY My purpose in this essay, which extends a project commenced a decade ago (Taylor 2009), is to analyse the sources of Thea Astley’s The Multiple Effects of Rainshadow, including but going beyond the list provided in the author’s ‘Acknowledgments.’ In truth, Astley’s achievement in Multiple Effects as in her other fiction far surpasses the sum of contributions that she derived from earlier writings. The mostly forgotten books that she lists as ‘[i]mpulses’ and her bequest to the Fryer Library of her newspaper sources and hand-written notes suggest that she may have welcomed a study of this novel’s genesis. The essay begins with an overview of the place of Multiple Effects in Astley’s oeuvre and the literary and political contexts for Astley’s increasing engagement with the history of Aboriginal dispossession. It then turns in detail to the novel itself and offers an excavation of the sources that inform its historical narrative. In doing this I hope to demonstrate something about Astley’s creative process: the extent and detail of her research, the ways in which her novel creatively reworks this archive, and some of the effects of that on the kind of history that Astley tells. Following the publication in 1994 of Coda, intended as the title indicates to be Astley’s last novel, the Keating Labor government awarded her a five-year Creative Fellowship of $325,000. Thus encouraged, after ‘one year of musing and two years of writing’ (Sayer 18) at Cambewarra on the NSW south coast, Astley published Multiple Effects in August 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Reproductive Effort in a Group of Plural-Breeding Pied Butcherbirds Cracticus Nigrogularis
    Australian Field Ornithology 2012, 29, 169–181 Contributions to the reproductive effort in a group of plural-breeding Pied Butcherbirds Cracticus nigrogularis D.G. Gosper 39 Azure Avenue, Balnarring VIC 3926, Australia Email: [email protected] Summary. Concurrent nesting by two females from a single social group of Pied Butcherbirds Cracticus nigrogularis is described. Young fledged from two nests in the first 2 years, but breeding failed in the following two seasons after Australian Magpies C. tibicen displaced the group from its original nest-tree. The two breeding females in the Pied Butcherbird group constructed their nests and incubated synchronously in the same tree without conflict. Only the females constructed the nest and incubated the eggs. Other group members fed the females before laying and during incubation. Females begged for food using a display resembling that of juvenile Butcherbirds. Most (and probably all) members of the group fed the nestlings and fledglings, with multiple members delivering food to the young in both nests and removing or eating faecal sacs. Immatures at the beginning of their second year, with no previous experience, performed the full range of helping tasks, including the provisioning of females from the pre-laying stage. During the nestling stage, the group fed on nectar from Silky Oaks Grevillea robusta, but did not feed this to the young. Introduction The Pied Butcherbird Cracticus nigrogularis (Artamidae) may breed co-operatively (Rowley 1976; Dow 1980; Clarke 1995). Higgins et al. (2006) considered it to be an occasional co-operative breeder, although the only detailed study to date (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • T1 Stakeholder, Traditional Owner & Community Engagement Assessment
    T1: STAKEHOLDER, TRADITIONAL OWNER AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT A report provided to the Australian Government by the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program Taylor B1, Vella K2, Maclean K1, Newlands M3, Ritchie B4, Lockie S3, Lacey J1, Baresi U2, Barber M1, Siehoyono Sie L4, Martin M3, Marshall N1, Koopman D5 1Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation 2Queensland University of Technology 3James Cook University 4University of Queensland 5Australian Institute of Marine Science September 2019 Inquiries should be addressed to: Dr Bruce Taylor [email protected] This report should be cited as Taylor B, Vella K, Maclean K, Newlands M, Ritchie B, Lockie S, Lacey J, Baresi U, Barber M, Siehoyono Sie L, Martin M, Marshall N, Koopman D (2019) Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program: Stakeholder, Traditional Owner and Community Engagement Assessment. A report provided to the Australian Government by the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program (95 pp). Copyright Except insofar as copyright in this document's material vests in third parties the material contained in this document constitutes copyright owned and/or administered by the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS). AIMS reserves the right to set out the terms and conditions for the use of such material. Wherever a third party holds copyright in material presented in this document, the copyright remains with that party. Their permission may be required to use the material. AIMS has made all reasonable efforts to clearly label material where the copyright is owned by a third party and ensure that the copyright owner has consented to this material being presented in this document. Acknowledgement This work was undertaken for the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program, a collaboration of leading experts, to create a suite of innovative measures to help preserve and restore the Great Barrier Reef.
    [Show full text]
  • Message Stickyour Way Forward
    Message StickYour way forward September 2019 A proposal for furthering the Uluru Statement from the Heart Ewamian Tatampi Puranga Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC Ewamian Aboriginal Corporation Doing Deadly Things& In Eco-Tourism NAIDOC NAIDOC WEEK: POSTERS OF THE PAST 2019 1972 TO PRESENT VOICE. TREATY. TRUTH. NATIVE TITLE Djabugay culture lights up Redlynch Ngarraboolgan gets Djungan Cultural Sign Update from the Chief Executive Officer Engagement & Development Support Unit Update Message from Madam Chair Pictured: Dennis Hunter, Djabugay Traditional Owner Traditional Djabugay Dennis Hunter, Pictured: Your way forward Message Update Native Title Update: From From The Compensation Engagement & Madam CEO Development Chair Support Team A Proposal Ewamian Djabugay NAIDOC for Furthering Doing Deadly Culture 2019: the Uluru Things In Lights up VOICE. Statement Eco-Tourism Redlynch TREATY. from the TRUTH. Heart NAIDOC Week Ngarraboolgan Posters Of gets Djungan The Past: Cultural Sign 1972-NOW Message Stick is published by the North Queensland Land Council Native Title Representative Body Aboriginal Corporation Body Aboriginal Corporation Representative Title by the North Queensland Land Council Native Stick is published Message is information Any resale. for Stick is not Message CEO. of the NQLC consent in whole, or part, without the written reproduced and should not be to NQLC copyright Stick are of Message (ICN 1996). The contents of by the Department provided from funding Stick is made possible Message of significance. sites deceased individuals or cultural contain used that any images for time of writing. The publisher apologises at correct Michelle Liddy on 1800 814 779 or [email protected]. the editor contact Stick, please Message queries regarding Any and Cabinet.
    [Show full text]