River Geology and Rafting a Portfolio by Mark Nair
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation
2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060 -
Metolius River Subbasin Fish Management Plan
METOLIUS RIVER SUBBASIN FISH MANAGEMENT PLAN UPPER DESCHUTES FISH DISTRICT December 1996 Principal Authors: Ted Fies Brenda Lewis Mark Manion Steve Marx ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The principal authors wish to acknowledge the help, encouragement, comments, and edits contributed by a large number of people including the Technical and Public Advisory Committees, ODFW Fish Division and Habitat Conservation Division staffs, Central Region staffs, other basin planners, district biologists, and staff from other agencies helped answer questions throughout the development of the plan. We especially want to thank members of the public who contributed excellent comments and management direction. We would also like to thank our families and friends who supported us during the five years of completing this task. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword iii Map of the Metolius River Subbasin 1 Introduction 2 METOLIUS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES INCLUDING LAKE CREEK 4 Current Land Classification and Management 4 Access 5 Habitat and Habitat Limitations 6 Fish Resources 11 Fish Stocking History 17 Angling Regulations 19 Fishery 20 Fish Management 21 Management Issues 29 Management Direction 30 SUTTLE AND BLUE LAKES SUBBASIN 41 Suttle and Blue Lakes, and Link Creek 41 Location and Ownership 41 Habitat and Habitat Limitations 42 Fish Stocking History 45 Angling Regulations 46 Fish Management 48 Management Issues 51 Management Direction 52 METOLIUS SUBBASIN HIGH LAKES 57 Overview, Location and Ownership 57 Access 57 Habitat and Habitat Limitations 57 Fish Management 58 Management Issues 61 Management Direction 61 APPENDICES 67 Appendix A: References 67 Appendix B: Glossary 71 Appendix C: Oregon Administrative Rules 77 ii FOREWORD The Fish Management Policy of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) requires that management plans be prepared for each basin or management unit. -
Nificant Natural Area Sites and Interconnections
.~ ". \ i' .- / ,.• --- ./ \. \ ~ • I. • h j . .LC .' \. \ \ '.', ."'- /_ ,I • ~, I • ,{ \ I j .' ,,'" "..', r -, " (. ) ./ ..~, / / --)" ( , / '- L • r-( ."• \ " • ." L •~ rr ('., r I" ~••. / r ~ ). ," , \ . ) / ) •. ~ \ '-: '.' / -' ", ,'; ---' -, ", - ( '..\~ , " ' '. ,J \. ) .~ .\ / -" ,e.' ·r ","." ~ METROPOLITAN - e> )~ .' \ I" e :\(?-reel1space~, :- J • 'f /' r: /. ..../ .J \ • ~.' / l .. 'v' /". • '> I / I e-, ~ ./ ,I \ • .>" ) Master-Piait ) e• .,/ r ", / Ij .'-..... L e "'" '. \ e ( r e /. e e, , --- '~. e j -.', ,. ;' r .. •er, ) r / -'. ~ \' - ( . ~ . ., ~ ~' -\ A Cooperative Regio!lal$ystem ofNa.tural Areas, "Open Space, T~f!:..ils a~¢ Gree.nways / /', ' '.)' " forWilcJlife and p,!ople . ./( . ./ ,... ' .... / r • '. X- •.\ / e ! -, "e- ( \ - '- '\ .J • r~gional go~ernmeht (As' ofJuly 1992) "- (. • Metro is the 'directly elected thatserves , .. ,/ Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington cOUlities andilie 24 Policy Advisory COn:'!m,ittee M,ember;s: • \'citiesThat make up the P~rtlana metropolita~;rea. " "'- Ri~hard Devlin, Metro councilor and chair •e- Metr~is ;~spon~ible f~r soli~:~aste management, op~ration/of Ruth~cFariana, Metro,co~n;ilor rmd vice-chair ,_ .i ,'-- M~tro us~ \, the Washington Park Zoo, transportation-and land Sandi Hansen/Metro councilor " "- ~" ' pl~nping, 1da~inerstad, commissi~ne~ urban growth boundary management, technical ." J Judie Clackamas County . ,. services to local go\\ernments and, 'through the Metropolitan Pauline Anderson, Multnomah County commissioner ) r·, ) : fxposition)Recre,ation Gommission,man~gementofthe -
Citywide Systems Plan
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2035 Comprehensive Plan Citywide Systems Plan June 2016 Portland’s Comprehensive Plan Update For more information, visit: www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/pdxcompplan Adopted Plan June 2016 Citywide Systems Plan Acknowledgements Primary Authors Additional Contributors and Technical Advisors The following members of the Citywide Systems Team contributed significantly to the development of the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Roberta Jortner and Carmen Piekarski Citywide Systems Plan: Portland Parks & Recreation Susan Aldrich, Bureau of Environmental Services Brett Horner, Emily Roth, and Jenn Cairo Michele Crim, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Portland Water Bureau Jeff Leighton Sara Culp, Bureau of Environmental Services Portland Bureau of Transportation Courtney Duke, Bureau of Transportation Denver Igarta, Grant Morehead, Rodney Jennings Bob Glascock, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Bureau of Environmental Services Virgil Adderley*, Elisabeth Reese-Cadigan, Susan Hartnett, Office of Management and Finance Alice Brawley-Chesworth, Sam Murray, Dawn Uchiyama, Marie Walkiewicz Sarah Huggins, Portland Parks & Recreation Bureau of Technology Services Michelle Kunec-North, Bureau of Planning and Carol Brune Sustainability (Project Coordinator) Portland Fire & Rescue Patricia Neighbor*, Bureau of Transportation Marco Benetti, Brian Alcid* Erik Olson, Office of Management and Finance Portland Police Bureau Ann Krohn, Michael Crebs, John Scruggs Mike Saling, Portland Water Bureau Portland Bureau of Emergency Management Carmen Merlo Emergency Communications Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Lisa Turley Leadership OMF-Facilities Services Charlie Hales, Mayor Robert Kieta Susan Anderson, Director CityFleet John Hunt Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner * Former Adopted Plan June 2016 Citywide Systems Plan Adopted Plan June 2016 Citywide Systems Plan Table of Contents Reader’s Guide 1 Chapter 1. -
DOGAMI Open-File Report O-83-03, Survey of Potential Geothermal
DOE/BP/272 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1005 State Office Building Portland, Oregon 97201 OPEN-FILE REPORT 0-83-3 SURVEY OF POTENTIAL GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION SITES AT NEWBERRY VOLCANO, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON 1983 edited by George R. Priest, Beverly F. Vogt, and Gerald L. Black, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries This work was supported by the Bonneville Power Administration under Cooperative Agreement No. DE-AC79-82BP36734. Governi Board State Geologist Allen P. St·inchfield, Chairman, North Bend Donald A. Hull Donald A. Haagensen, Portland Sidney R. Johnson, Baker Deputy State Geologist John D. Beaulieu NOTICE The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. NOTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the subject matter is consistent with the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of information, this paper ~as not been edited to our usual standards. ii CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, by George R. Priest 1 Introduction 1 Objectives 1 Methodology 1 Assumptions 2 Conclusions 2 Acknowledgments 4 CHAPTER 2. GEOLOGY OF THE NEWBERRY VOLCANO AREA, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, by George R. Priest 5 Introduction . 5 Genera 1 Geo 1 ogy . 5 Results of USGS Drilling Program 10 Geophysical Evidence for a Shallow Intrusive 12 Distribution of Volcanic Centers: Implications for the Lateral Extent of a Silicic Intrusive Body 13 Caldera Geometry: Implications for Depths to Former Magma Chambers . -
A P P E N D I X A
Pelton Round Butte Project Settlement Agreement A P P E N D I X A WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATES and WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN for the PELTON ROUND BUTTE PROJECT – FERC No. 2030 Appendix A1 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Clean Water Act § 401 Certification Conditions Appendix A2 Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, Water Control Board Clean Water Act § 401 Certification Conditions Appendix A3 Water Quality Management and Monitoring Plan (WQMMP) prepared by Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon and Portland General Electric Company Appendix A1 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Clean Water Act § 401 Certification Conditions Clean Water Act § 401 Certification Conditions For the Pelton Round Butte Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2030) Deschutes River Basin Jefferson County, Oregon Upon Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issuance of a new license for the Pelton Round Butte Hydroelectric Project, Portland General Electric Company and the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (Joint Applicants) shall comply with the following § 401 conditions: A. Water Quality Management and Monitoring Plan Within 90 days of issuance of the §401 certification, the Joint Applicants, in consultation with ODEQ, shall revise the Water Quality Management and Monitoring Plan attached to these certification conditions as Exhibit A and submit the revised plan to ODEQ for approval. The plan as approved by ODEQ is hereafter referred to in these certification conditions as the “WQMMP”. Upon ODEQ approval, the WQMMP becomes a part of the §401 certification for the Project for purposes of any federal license or permit thereafter issued. B. -
Vacation Rentals “We Stayed at Her Beautiful Home in Sisters When We Attended the Sisters Folk Festival
NW BOOMER & SENIOR NEWS SPECIAL • JULY 2018 YOUR NEXT ADVENTURE IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER Vacation rentals “We stayed at her beautiful home in Sisters when we attended the Sisters Folk Festival. It is an amazing large custom log home on 2 acres surrounded by pine and aspen trees.” Jo Schechter We are excited to unveil just like we do our own, so a reservation today. No extra The NW Connector gives ly and accessible to answer our newly re-branded you feel at home. Our homes fees, only nightly rental, people an easy travel option questions. To encourage company, Rocking CR are pet friendly (with a fee) cleaning and tax. Mention to driving to the Coast or people to ride the NW Con- Vacation Rentals, along and non-smoking. We invite our ad and get a 10 percent driving Hwy. 101 along the nector, riders can purchase a with our completely re-de- you to visit RockingCRvaca- launch promotion discount. Coast. Short stay or long three-day ($25) or seven-day signed website. Located in tionRentals.com and make stay, the NW Connector is ($30) pass from the bus Central Oregon, we have available as it operates buses driver which gives them one three unique home rentals seven days a week, and con- round trip to and from the in Bend, Sisters and Tuma- nects to Tri-Met, Amtrak and coast and unlimited travel at lo, each offering incredible Greyhound. the Coast. It’s a great deal! access to everything Cen- Riders can leave the Willa- How do you ride the NW tral Oregon has to offer. -
Caddress Ccomment Cemail Cname Comme Nt Id Czip
LIAISON COMME _DISTRIC NEIGHB CADDRESS CCOMMENT CEMAIL CNAME NT_ID CZIP T ORHOOD TAGS Housing I support additional density capacity in Portland neighborhoods, especially those neighborhoods near public transit Arbor types,Mapping 7155 n Fenwick ave options like Max. [email protected] Jacob Edwards 27306 97217 North Lodge the "a" overlay Allow more liberal development of duplexes they should not be limited to just corners. Up zone to allow higher density developments. [email protected] Benjamin Kerensa 27310 97213 Southeast Mt. Tabor Housing types I support all efforts to increase the amount of housing in Portland! Increased density is so much more efficient. I 2611 NE Knott know this is a contentious topic and I appreciate the city's efforts - thank you! [email protected] Liz Rickles 27312 97212 Housing types I have lived in the Cully neighborhood for the last 45 years. It is a neighborhood of larger lots and older and smaller houses. A lot as changed over the years. As urban renewal has driven minorities out of the closer in neighborhoods through rezoning and building of "new" housing, Cully has been a refuge. Our neighborhood is now one of the last affordable places to live for these and many other people. I have seen a few lots that have been bought up in anticipation of the RIP coming into effect. These are family lots with and older house that are bought for $300,000 that will then have 9 houses built on them with each one selling for over $400,000. This displaces many people of all Housing races who are financially not as well off as the new occupants. -
Ordinance 187832, Vol. 2.3.A, Page 13748
PSC Map App Testimony Reporting Period - 7/21/14 to 3/14/15 CommentIDCommentor DateReceived Comment GeoArea Topic 3900 Dan Reed Miller 3/14/15 This project makes me wonder if the concept \"induced demand\" has not yet gained currency in the heirarchy of Central City transportation planning in Oregon. Study after study, empirical observation after empirical observation, has shown that building more lanes to r 3899 Dan Reed Miller 3/14/15 This connection is long overdue! I was very disappointed when the eastside streetcar went in with no Central City accommodation of bicycle infrastructure at the I-84 crossing. A bike/ped bridge at 7th will make a huge positive difference to the vitality and long-term 3898 Ted Buehler 3/14/15 I ride from NE to SE regularly, and crossing I-84 is a real barrier. Please fill in this gap in the network. Central City 3897 Ted Buehler 3/14/15 Yes to Bike Share! I spent 3 days in Manhattan last year and thoroughly enjoyed the bike share. It made it possible West Northeast Central City STransportation + TSP + parking to visit all sorts of places I\'d have had trouble getting to just by walking or subway, and it was a real treat as a visitor to see the 3896 Ted Buehler 3/14/15 Please -- don\'t spend our tax dollars to widen a freeway. This is a 1970s solution to a 21st century problem. East Instead, spend our money on proactive, future-oriented solutions that will move people, not cars. Thank you. -
Portland Metro Levee System Feasibility Study
Portland Metro Levee System Feasibility Study Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment Appendix H – Cultural Resources January 2020 Page left blank to facilitate 2-sided copying. Contents Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose Statement ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Study Scope ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Project Area Description and Background ............................................................................... 10 2.1. Environmental Setting ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Environmental History ....................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Precontact Context ............................................................................................................. 20 2.4. Previous Archaeological Investigations ............................................................................. 21 2.5. Archaeological Potential .................................................................................................... 24 2.6. Native Peoples .................................................................................................................. -
Metolius River by Bart Wills the Metolius River Is a Spring-Dominated Tributary of the Deschutes River in Central Oregon
Metolius River By Bart Wills The Metolius River is a spring-dominated tributary of the Deschutes River in central Oregon. The river is named for the Warm Springs Sahaptin word for "white fish," which refers to a light-colored Chinook salmon. The river is a sacred place for the Wasco, Warm Springs, and Northern Paiute of the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs, who have hunted, gathered, and fished from the river for thousands of years. The vibrant, crystalline, turquoise water of the twenty-nine-mile-long Metolius flows north from the base of Black Butte, passing the small community of Camp Sherman and eleven Forest Service campgrounds. After it passes Candle Creek, the river begins a relatively secluded journey, hooking east around Castle Rock, a nine-million-year-old volcanic plug, on the south and the Warm Springs Reservation to the north. The Metolius then flows southeast into Lake Billy Chinook, a reservoir, where it joins the Deschutes and Crooked Rivers. The portion of the Cascade Range immediately west of the Metolius valley is mostly younger than one million years—geologically young compared to the rest of the range. The moderate fault scarp, known as Green Ridge, has only 2,000 feet of vertical relief above the valley, with the rock at the top of the ridge preserving the geologic history of a slow collapse of volcanic lava flows five million years ago. Volcanic activity remained constant through time and continued to form new volcanoes, whose lava flows slowly filled the deep valley. Every hundred thousand years or so, the mountains were covered in hundreds of feet of ice, and glaciers ground down the volcanoes and deposited their remains in the valley as sediments of sand, gravel, and boulders. -
Geology of Oregon Orr Orr.Pdf
Fifth Edition Geology of Oregon Elizabeth L. Orr William N. Orr University of Oregon Cover: Ripple-marked sand dunes on the Oregon Coast resemble a gigantic fingerprint (photo by Gary Tepfer). Copyright ® 1964 by Ewart M. Baldwin Copyright ® 1976, 1981, 1992, 2000 by Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company ISBN 0-7872-6608-6 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Printed in the United States of America 10 98765432 Table of Contents Introduction 1 History of geologic study in Oregon 9 Blue Mountains 21 Klamath Mountains 51 Basin and Range 79 High Lava Plains 103 Deschutes-Columbia Plateau 121 Cascade Mountains 141 Coast Range 167 Willamette Valley 203 Bibliography 223 Glossary 245 Index 251 iii Dedicated to the graduates Acknowledgments Between the fourth and fifth editions of Geology of Oregon, the importance of global tectonics to the state has been ingrained even deeper. Riding on the leading edge of the moving North American plate, Oregon reflects the underlying mecha- nism of the plate collision boundary in virtually all aspects of its geology. In the seven years since the fourth edition was written, an irregular but continuing drumbeat of earthquakes reminds us of the forces beneath our feet and the need to prepare for catastrophic changes be they quakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, floods, or massive earth movements. Most profound is the discovery of irrefutable evidence that these catastrophes have been visited on the state quite regularly over the past few thousands of years as well as the absolute surety that similar disasters will oc- cur in the near and distant future.