DOCSLIB.ORG

Computational Study of Direct Fuel Injection in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Computational Study of Direct Fuel Injection in The COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF DIRECT FUEL INJECTION IN THE ROTAX 914 ENGINE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering By BRAD PAUL POLLOCK B.S.M.E, University of Toledo, 2005 2010 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES December 14, 2010 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Brad Pollock ENTITLED Computational Study of Direct Fuel Injection in the Rotax 914 Engine BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Engineering Committee on Final Examination Haibo Dong, Ph.D. Haibo Dong, Ph.D. Thesis Director George P.G. Huang, P.E., Ph.D. John Hoke, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering College of Engineering and Computer Science Hui Wan, Ph.D. Andrew Hsu, Ph.D. Dean, School of Graduate Studies ABSTRACT Pollock, Brad. M.S.Egr., Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Wright State University, 2010. Computational Study of Direct Fuel Injection in the Rotax 914 Engine. Direct injection spark ignition (DISI) is a fuel delivery method in which the fuel is introduced directly into the combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine. Although direct fuel injection was first pioneered in the early 1920’s, it has only recently become a reliable option due to advances made in control systems and injection technology. Direct injection enables increased fuel efficiency and higher power output than a conventional Port Fuel Injection (PFI) system. By delivering pressurized fuel directly into the cylinder, the degree of fuel atomization and the fuel vaporization rate are increased. Hence, the air/fuel mixture can be more precisely maintained, benefiting both fuel economy and emissions. In addition, the cooling effect of fuel droplets changing to vapor inside the combustion chamber facilitates a higher compression ratio and lessens the likelihood of knock. DISI has witnessed a resurrected interest in the automotive industry due to its promise of better fuel economy, additional power, reduced emissions and the ability to operate on multiple fuels. The aviation industry, on the other hand, has largely forgotten about the internal combustion engine subsequent to the invention of the jet engine. However, the introduction of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) has encouraged a renewed interest in small internal combustion engines such as the Rotax 914. Although, these iii engines provide a cheap power plant, they lack the power and efficiency required for their application. Consequently, by employing DISI in UAS engines, it affords flexibility with regards to fuel choice while also providing longer flight times and more power with less weight. As with any new application of technology, DISI in these smaller engines must first be tested and refined until it can seamlessly replace PFI. Experimental testing can be costly and time consuming, but computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can help speed the design process by performing parametric analysis to determine an optimum configuration to begin testing. For this thesis, a model of the Rotax 914 engine was developed to computationally model the effects of direct injection on the engine. Gambit was adopted for geometry generation and meshing, while Fluent was used for fluid motion and combustion simulation. A PFI version of the computational model was validated against experimental results of a Rotax 914 engine in order to add fidelity to the model. DISI was then applied to the model and a study was performed to determine operation capabilities under different operating conditions. iv Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM ............................................................................................................1 1.2 BACKGROUND AND RELEVANCE TO PREVIOUS WORK..........................................................4 1.3 GENERAL METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED ..........................................5 1.4 LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................................................................6 1.5 THESIS OUTLINE.......................................................................................................................15 CHAPTER 2: COMPUTATIONAL MODELING ............................................................................ 18 2.1 MODELING AND MESHING.........................................................................................................18 2.1.1 Modeling.......................................................................................................................18 2.1.2 Meshing ........................................................................................................................22 2.1.3 Boundary Conditions.....................................................................................................26 2.2 COMPUTATIONAL MODELS ........................................................................................................32 2.2.1 Turbulence Models .......................................................................................................32 2.2.2 Combustion Models ......................................................................................................34 2.2.3 Spark Ignition................................................................................................................36 2.2.4 Autoignition ..................................................................................................................37 2.2.5 Injections.......................................................................................................................39 2.2.6 Solver Settings ..............................................................................................................40 CHAPTER 3: EXPERIMENTAL SETUP, RESULTS AND MODEL VALIDATIONS .............................. 46 3.1 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP...............................................................................................................46 3.2 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS............................................................................................................48 3.3 COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS ........................................................................................................53 3.3.1 Computational Cycle.....................................................................................................53 3.3.2 Cold Flow ......................................................................................................................58 3.3.3 Computational Results..................................................................................................62 3.4 VALIDATION STUDY ..................................................................................................................64 3.4.1 Physical Comparison.....................................................................................................64 3.4.2 Boundary Conditions & Initial Conditions .....................................................................66 v 3.4.3 Output Comparison.......................................................................................................69 CHAPTER 4: DIRECTION INJECTION STUDY ............................................................................. 73 4.1 PFI SETTINGS ..........................................................................................................................73 4.2 SPARK TIMING STUDY ...............................................................................................................76 4.3 INJECTION ANGLE.....................................................................................................................78 4.4 INJECTION TIMING....................................................................................................................82 4.5 SPARK ENERGY STUDY...............................................................................................................83 4.6 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................85 CHAPTER 5: BOWL PISTON DIRECTION INJECTION STUDY ...................................................... 87 5.1 COLD FLOW / CHARGE MOTION STUDY .......................................................................................87 5.2 INJECTION ANGLE.....................................................................................................................92 5.3 INJECTION TIMING....................................................................................................................95 5.4 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................99 CHAPTER 6: FUTURE WORK AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... 102 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 107 REFERENCES................................................................................................................... 109 vi Nomenclature PFI Port Fuel Injection DISI direct injection spark ignition SI Spark ignition Φ Equivalence ratio GDI Gasoline Direct Injection CFD Computational fluid dynamics HCSI Homogeneous Charge Spark Ignition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UAT-ARC Final Report
    Unleaded AVGAS Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee FAA UAT ARC Final Report Part I Body Unleaded AVGAS Findings & Recommendations 17 February 2012 UAT ARC Final Report – Part I Body February 17, 2012 Table of Contents List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………… 6 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………… 8 1. Background …………………..……………………………………………………. 11 1.1. Value of General Aviation………………………………………………… 11 1.2. History of Leaded Aviation Gasoline…………………………………….. 13 1.3. Drivers for Development of Unleaded Aviation Gasoline……………… 14 2. UAT ARC Committee ……………………………………………………………… 16 2.1. FAA Charter……………………………………………………………….. 16 2.2. Membership ………………..…………………………………………….. 17 2.3. Meetings, Telecons, & Deliberations…………….……………………… 17 3. UAT ARC Assessment of Key Issues…………………………………………… 18 3.1. Summary of Key Issues Affecting Development & Transition to an Unleaded AVGAS…………………………………………………………….. 18 3.1.1. General Issues……………………………………………………… 18 3.1.2. Market & Economic Issues………………………………………… 18 3.1.3. Certification & Qualification Issues……………………………….. 18 3.1.4. Aircraft & Engine Technical Issues………………………………. 19 3.1.5. Production & Distribution Issues………………………………….. 19 3.1.6. Environment & Toxicology Issues………………………………… 19 3.2. General Issues – Will Not Be A Drop-In…………………………….……. 20 3.2.1. Drop-In vs. Transparent……………..……………………………. 20 3.2.2. Historic Efforts Focused on Drop-In…………………………….. 21 3.2.3. No Program to Support Development of AVGAS………………. 21 3.3. Market & Economic Issues…………………….. …………………………. 22 3.3.1. Market Forces……………………………………………………… 22 3.3.2. Aircraft Owner Market Perspective……………………………….. 23 3.3.3. Fleet Utilization …………..…………………………………………. 24 3.3.4. Design Approval Holder (DAH) Perspective ……………………. 25 3.4. Certification & Qualification Issues…………………………………………. 26 3.4.1. FAA Regulatory Structure…….……………………………………. 26 3.4.2. ASTM and FAA Data Requirements………………..……………. 27 3.4.3. FAA Certification Offices…………………………………………… 28 3.4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • General Aviation Aircraft Propulsion: Power and Energy Requirements
    UNCLASSIFIED General Aviation Aircraft Propulsion: Power and Energy Requirements • Tim Watkins • BEng MRAeS MSFTE • Instructor and Flight Test Engineer • QinetiQ – Empire Test Pilots’ School • Boscombe Down QINETIQ/EMEA/EO/CP191341 RAeS Light Aircraft Design Conference | 18 Nov 2019 | © QinetiQ UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Contents • Benefits of electrifying GA aircraft propulsion • A review of the underlying physics • GA Aircraft power requirements • A brief look at electrifying different GA aircraft types • Relationship between battery specific energy and range • Conclusions 2 RAeS Light Aircraft Design Conference | 18 Nov 2019 | © QinetiQ UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Benefits of electrifying GA aircraft propulsion • Environmental: – Greatly reduced aircraft emissions at the point of use – Reduced use of fossil fuels – Reduced noise • Cost: – Electric aircraft are forecast to be much cheaper to operate – Even with increased acquisition cost (due to batteries), whole-life cost will be reduced dramatically – Large reduction in light aircraft operating costs (e.g. for pilot training) – Potential to re-invigorate the GA sector • Opportunities: – Makes highly distributed propulsion possible – Makes hybrid propulsion possible – Key to new designs for emerging urban air mobility and eVTOL sectors 3 RAeS Light Aircraft Design Conference | 18 Nov 2019 | © QinetiQ UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Energy conversion efficiency Brushless electric motor and controller: • Conversion efficiency ~ 95% for motor, ~ 90% for controller • Variable pitch propeller efficiency
    [Show full text]
  • FLASHBLACK Instruction Manual
    Instruction manual Variable pitch propellers in flight FLASHBLACK FLASHBLACK Tractor Pusher BLACK Tractor Aérodrome de Villefranche Tarare (LFHV) 289 Avenue Odette & Edouard DURAND 69620 FRONTENAS - FRANCE Phone: + 33 (0)4 74 72 12 69 - Fax: +33 (0)4 74 72 10 01 ISO 9001:2015 Certified Company E-mail: [email protected] - www.DUC-helices.com for its Quality System Management DH_FSH-PV_BE_02_F Made in France 04/12/2018 Revision update Date Index Object of modification 23/07/2014 A Creation 20/07/2017 F Add SWIRLBLACK-3 & TBO update 11/12/2017 F Minor correction 10/04/2018 F English language correction 04/12/2018 F Minor change in page 42 This instruction manual is to be maintained throughout the life of the propeller. He may have to evolve. The owner must check with the DUC Hélices Company the latest version being valid applicable to the propeller. Identification Date Delivery note n° Engine/Gearbox Owner ratio Aircraft Pitch range Min: Max: Notes: .............................................................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building on a Heritage of Innovation and Performance
    BUILDING ON A HERITAGE OF INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE. Over 70 years of the world’s best marine engineering and innovation; a heritage of leading edge technology, performance, fuel economy and advanced reliability; standards that surpass all industry and consumer expectations. Since the beginning in 1939, Mercury Marine has built durable, powerful and innovative small horsepower portable outboard engines. Incorporating innovations throughout the years, including through prop exhaust, first seen on the 1957 Mark-10, Capacitor Discharge Ignition, dual water pickups and Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI), currently available on the 25 and 30hp FourStroke, and that’s only a snapshot. Nobody has a more thorough understanding of Portable outboards and the features they require than Mercury Marine. With 25 models in 66 configurations, ranging from 30hp to 2.5hp Mercury have the right portable option for you. Explore the range of Mercury portables and see why more boaters are starting up a Mercury. Mercury outboards are simply the best, most refined engines money can buy for any marine application. 33 Mercury Innovation Mercury Extreme Reliability Boating is not often thought of as a harsh environment. Just stop and think about it. Marine engines can and are often used for extended periods at wide-open throttle in harsh saltwater and full UV sunlight. Then sit in storage over the off season, in some cases without any use. At Mercury, we test our engines mercilessly and use those results to make them even more reliable. The tougher the test, the tougher the engine. We put our engines through tests such as vicious log strikes, saltwater spray booths, high humidity chambers and hot and cold water temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking After Your Rotax 912 Series Engine
    LOOKING AFTER YOUR ROTAX 912 SERIES ENGINE Most of the things you wanted to know about servicing a Rotax 912/914 series aircraft engine but were afraid to ask…. By Conrad Beale Copyright ConAir Sports Ltd. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 20 Most of the things you wanted to know about servicing a Rotax 912/914 series aircraft engine but were afraid to ask…. By Conrad Beale This article has been written by Conrad Beale of ConAir Sports Ltd. It is intended to help you look after your 912 series engine. It is in no way endorsed by Rotax. All information contained here in may be subject to change without notice. It does not substitute, override or in any way replace the information given in the Installation / Maintenance or Operators Manuals or any subsequent documentation issued by Rotax. The intention of this article is to assist the many Rotax 4 stroke engine owners, operators and engineers to carry out the work necessary to prolong the life of their Rotax 912/914 series aircraft engines. This article will touch on a number of subjects and will hopefully clear up some of the common questions we get asked. Some areas will be covered in detail, others less so. I hope it covers everything sufficiently. I have been involved with Rotax engines for 25+ years, 18 of which have been working commercially on Rotax aircraft engines. 8 years ago I set up ConAir Sports Ltd with my wife Louise and we are the only UK Skydrive appointed Service Centre for Rotax Aircraft Engines.
    [Show full text]
  • 550 Series Avgas Engine
    The 550 series includes 550 in3 models in either naturally aspirated or turbocharged configurations. With the right combination of thrust and efficiency, our 550-series engines are powering some of the most successful and high performing aircraft in general aviation history like the Cirrus® SR22T and Beechcraft® Baron/Bonanza, and Mooney®. With a powerful range of 280 to 350 HP at 2500 to 2700 RPM, you’ll be glad you fly a 550. THE 550 SERIES IS A FAMILY CERTIFIED FUELS: STROKE: TYPICAL WEIGHT: 100/100LL & 94UL 107.95 mm 207 to 317 kg OF AIR COOLED, NATURALLY AvGas (TSIO-550-K only) 4.25 in 456 to 699 lbs ASPIRATED, HORIZONTALLY DISPLACEMENT: COMPRESSION TIME BETWEEN OPPOSED, 6-CYLINDER, 9046 cm³ (COMP.) RATIO: OVERHAUL (TBO): 552 in3 7.5:1 1800 – 2200 hours GASOLINE, FUEL INJECTED, SPARK 8.5:1 IGNITION, FOUR-STROKE, DIRECT POWER: TURBO MODEL 209 to 261 kW HEIGHT: AVAILABILITY: DRIVE, RIGHT (CW) ROTATING, 280 to 350 HP 501.7 to 933.2 mm Yes AIRCRAFT ENGINE WITH MANUAL 19.75 to 36.74 in MAXIMUM ENGINE CONTROLS FOR FIXED RATED RPM: WIDTH: 2500 to 2700 r/min 852.4 to 1076.7 mm WING AIRCRAFT. THE TURBO 2500 to 2700 rpm 33.56 to 42.39 in SERIES IS TURBOCHARGED FOR BORE: LENGTH: FIXED WING AIRCRAFT. 133.35 mm 933.2 to 1215.6 mm 5.25 in 36.74 to 47.86 in WWW.CONTINENTAL.AERO # RATED DRY CERTIFIED COMP. TIME BETWEEN FAA MODEL 1 BORE × STROKE DISPLACEMENT 2 FUEL OVERHAUL CYL POWER WEIGHT GRADE RATIO (TBO) TCDS 224 kW @ 2700 133.35 x 107.95 mm 9046 cm³ 206.8 kg IO-550-A 6 100/ 100LL 8.5:1 1900 hours E3SO 300 HP @ 2700 5.25 x 4.25 in 552 in³ 455.9
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of the General Aviation Avgas Coalition
    COMMENTS OF THE GENERAL AVIATION AVGAS COALITION ON THE ADVANCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ON LEAD EMISSIONS FROM PISTON-ENGINE AIRCRAFT USING LEADED AVIATION GASOLINE EPA DOCKET NO. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0294 - 1 - I. INTRODUCTION On April 28, 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published in the Federal Register an “Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Lead Emissions from Piston- Engine Aircraft Using Leaded Aviation Gasoline” (the “ANPR”). 75 Fed. Reg. 22440. The General Aviation AvGas Coalition (the “Coalition”) respectfully submits the following comments on the ANPR. The Coalition is comprised of associations that represent industries, businesses, and individuals that would be directly impacted by any finding made by the EPA in regard to lead emissions from piston-engine aircraft, corresponding aircraft emissions standards, and related changes to the formulation of aviation gasoline. Coalition membership includes the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (“AOPA”), the Experimental Aircraft Association (“EAA”), the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (“GAMA”), the National Air Transportation Association (“NATA”), the National Business Aviation Association (“NBAA”), the American Petroleum Institute (“API”) and the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association (“NPRA”). Together, these organizations represent general aviation aircraft owners, operators, and manufacturers, and the producers, refiners, and distributors of aviation gasoline. 1 Since the establishment of the first National Ambient Air Quality Standard (“NAAQS”) for lead in 1978, the general aviation and petroleum industries have been committed to safely reducing lead emissions from piston powered aircraft. Today, 100 octane low lead (“100LL”) aviation gasoline (or “avgas”) contains 50 percent less lead than it did when the lead NAAQS were first introduced, dramatically reducing lead emissions from general aviation.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGINE TYPE 914 | 115 Hp (UL/F) AIRCRAFT ENGINES
    ENGINE TYPE 914 | 115 hp (UL/F) AIRCRAFT ENGINES DESCRIPTION • 4-cylinder • 4-stroke liquid/air-cooled engine with opposed cylinders • with turbo charger • with automatic waste gate control • dry sump forced lubrication with separate oil tank • automatic adjustment by hydraulic valve tappet • 2 carburetors • dual electronic ignition • electric starter • propeller speed reduction unit • engine mount assembly • air intake system • exhaust system FACTS The turbo charged Rotax 914 series offers more performance at high altitudes while keeping weight at a low level. This series offers a time between overhauls of 2.000 hrs and is available as certified (Rotax 914 F) according to FAR 33 and JAR-E and non-certified version (Rotax 914 UL). ENGINE DATA WEIGHT kg lb engine with propeller speed reduction unit i = 2,43 64.0 140.8 exhaust system 4.0 8.8 engine suspension frame 2.0 3.7 overload clutch 1.7 3.7 external alternator 3.0 6.6 air guide hood 0.8 1.8 VERSION PERFORMANCE TORQUE MAX RPM kW ft. lb. 1/min Nm ft. lb. 1/min 1/min 914 UL1)/F2) 84.5 115 5800 144 106 4900 5800 Limited for max. 5 min. BORE STROKE DISPLACEMENT FUEL min. MON 85 RON 95* 79.5 mm 3.13 in 61 mm 2.4 in 1211.2 cm3 73.91 cu. in. min. AKI 91* * leaded or unleaded or AVGAS 100LL 1) UL = non certified 2) F = certified acc. to ARF 33 and JAR-E Picture: 914 UL - DCDI with options WWW.FLYROTAX.COM ® and TM are trademarks of BRP-Rotax GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Tecumseh T E C H N I C I a N ' S H a N D B O O K
    TECUMSEH T E C H N I C I A N ' S H A N D B O O K This manual covers the following basic type or model numbers dependent on age of product: AH520, AH600, AV520, AV600, HSK600, TVS600. This manual covered many engines under an Old form of Identification which will need to be reviewed as well. TYPE / SPECIFICATION NUMBER 638-670 1398-1642 and Craftsman 200 Series Models. 2-CYCLE ENGINES Contents Page Page GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................... 1 PRIMER BULB (DIAPHRAGM ENGINE IDENTIFICATION................................... 1 CARBURETOR) ................................................ 11 INTERPRETATION OF MODEL NUMBER .......... 1 CARBURETOR CHECK VALVE ......................... 11 ENGINE CARE ......................................................... 2 CARBURETOR SERVICE PROCEDURE ......... 12 SHORT BLOCKS .................................................. 2 EMISSIONIZED DIAPHRAGM CARBURETION13 STORAGE: ............................................................ 2 OUTBOARD CARBURETORS .............................. 13 TUNE-UP PROCEDURE ...................................... 3 OUTBOARD CONTROL PANEL ........................ 14 EXHAUST PORT CLEANING .............................. 3 CARBURETOR ADJUSTMENTS .......................... 15 2-CYCLE THEORY OF OPERATION ...................... 4 IDLE SPEED ADJUSTMENT ............................. 15 OPERATION OF PISTON PORT STYLE ............ 4 FLOAT TYPE-FIXED MAIN, IDLE ADJUST ...... 15 OPERATION OF REED PORTED STYLE DIAPHRAGM - SINGLE AND DUAL WITH LOOP SCAVENGING.............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Drive to Outperform
    2018 ANNUAL REVIEW FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2018 THE DRIVE TO OUTPERFORM FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FISCAL YEAR 2018 REVENUE BASE REVENUE BASE BY CATEGORY BY REGION AT 31/01/18 AT 31/01/18 40.8% 34.8% 15.7% 8.7% 50.5% 32.2% 17.3% YEAR-ROUND SEASONAL PARTS, ACCESSORIES PROPULSION UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CANADA PRODUCTS PRODUCTS AND CLOTHING SYSTEMS SHARE PRICE MONTHLY CLOSING PRICE IN CA$ $50.86 JANUARY 2018 $26.03 FEBRUARY 2017 MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL NORMALIZED NORMALIZED RESEARCH AND REVENUES EBITDA1 EARNINGS PER DEVELOPMENT CA$ MILLIONS, CA$ MILLIONS, SHARE – DILUTED1 SPENDING AT 31/01/18 AT 31/01/18 CA$, AT 31/01/18 IN CA$ MILLIONS + AS A % OF REVENUES CAGR* 9% CAGR* 10% CAGR* 12% 3,194 3,525 3,829 4,172 4,487 380.2 421.3 460.0 502.7 558.6 1.49 1.65 1.71 1.96 2.38 145 + 4% 158 + 4% 164 + 4% 184 + 4% 199 + 4% 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 18 1 See Non-IFRS measures section on p.15. * Compound Annual Growth Rate since 31 January 2014 LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 – JOSÉ BOISJOLI THE DRIVE TO OUTPERFORM I am very pleased with the strong financial results we delivered once again, featuring another year of record revenues, continuing our steady positive performance since we became a public company five years ago. We are now three years into our ambitious 2020 plan and remain focused on our strategic priorities of Growth, Agility and Lean enterprise to reach our target: the $6 billion mark and $3.50 diluted earnings per share by fiscal year 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Efficiently
    MIKE BUSCH COMMENTARY / SAVVY AVIATOR A GPS-coupled fuel totalizer (like this Shadin Digifl o that I have in my airplane) is a great help in achieving Flying maximum effi ciency. Efficiently It’s more important than ever to get the best bang for the buck HOW CAN WE GET THE BEST FUEL economy from our airplanes? Given much energy as possible from each combus- the painful cost of avgas these days, this question is on lots of airplane tion event before the exhaust valve opens and owners’ minds. That goes at least double for unfortunate folks like me discards what’s left. and Mac McClellan who fl y twins. It’s a subject I’ve thought about— Operating at WOT and low rpm will make and researched—quite a bit. some pilots uncomfortable, because they had a It turns out that there are lots of pieces to this puzzle. There are all fl ight instructor who taught them never to sorts of things we can do to optimize effi ciency. Some are simple; some operate the engine oversquare—that is, with are a bit more complex. It takes considerable attention to detail to fl y manifold pressure (in inches) greater than the as effi ciently as possible. rpm (divided by 100). This is exactly what I was taught by my primary instructor in 1965, THROTTLE and it took me more than a decade to fi gure Let’s start with something simple: throttle position. out that my CFI didn’t know what the heck he Our piston aircraft engines are always most effi cient at wide-open was talking about.
    [Show full text]
  • Diesel, Spark-Ignition, and Turboprop Engines for Long-Duration Unmanned Air Flights
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER Diesel, Spark-Ignition, and Turboprop Engines for Long-Duration Unmanned Air Flights Daniele Cirigliano,∗ Aaron M. Frisch,† Feng Liu,‡ and William A. Sirignano‡ University of California, Irvine, California 92697 DOI: 10.2514/1.B36547 Comparisons are made for propulsion systems for unmanned flights with several hundred kilowatts of propulsive power at moderate subsonic speeds up to 50 h in duration. Gas-turbine engines (turbofans and turboprops), two- and four-stroke reciprocating (diesel and spark-ignition) engines, and electric motors (with electric generation by a combustion engine) are analyzed. Thermal analyses of these engines are performed in the power range of interest. Consideration is given to two types of generic missions: 1) a mission dominated by a constant-power requirement, and 2) a mission with intermittent demand for high thrust and/or substantial auxiliary power. The weights of the propulsion system, required fuel, and total aircraft are considered. Nowadays, diesel engines for airplane applications are rarely a choice. However, this technology is shown to bea very serious competitor for long-durationunmanned air vehicle flights. The two strongest competitors are gas-turbine engines and turbocharged four-stroke diesel engines, each type driving propellers. It is shown that hybrid-electric schemes and configurations with several propellers driven by one power source are less efficient. At the 500 KW level, one gas-turbine engine driving a larger propeller is more efficient for durations up to 25 h, whereas several diesel engines driving several propellers become more efficient at longer durations. The decreasing efficiency of the gas-turbine engine with decreasing size and increasing compression ratio is a key factor.
    [Show full text]