DOCSLIB.ORG

Democratic Strain and Popular Discontent in Europe: Responding to the Challenges Facing Liberal Democracies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Democratic Strain and Popular Discontent in Europe: Responding to the Challenges Facing Liberal Democracies DEMOCRATIC STRAIN AND POPULAR DISCONTENT IN EUROPE: RESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGES FACING LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development Michael Levitt, Chair JUNE 2019 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission. Also available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca DEMOCRATIC STRAIN AND POPULAR DISCONTENT IN EUROPE: RESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGES FACING LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development Michael Levitt Chair JUNE 2019 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION NOTICE TO READER Reports from committee presented to the House of Commons Presenting a report to the House is the way a committee makes public its findings and recommendations on a particular topic. Substantive reports on a subject-matter study usually contain a synopsis of the testimony heard, the recommendations made by the committee, as well as the reasons for those recommendations. STANDING COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHAIR Michael Levitt VICE-CHAIRS Hon. Erin O’Toole Guy Caron MEMBERS Ziad Aboultaif Leona Alleslev Frank Baylis Pamela Goldsmith-Jones (Parliamentary Secretary — Non-Voting Member) Kamal Khera (Parliamentary Secretary — Non-Voting Member) Robert Oliphant (Parliamentary Secretary — Non-Voting Member) Raj Saini Jati Sidhu Anita Vandenbeld Borys Wrzesnewskyj OTHER MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO PARTICIPATED Gary Anandasangaree Kerry Diotte Linda Duncan Garnett Genuis Stephanie Kusie Anne Minh-Thu CLERK OF THE COMMITTEE Erica Pereira iii LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Brian Hermon, Analyst Scott McTaggart, Analyst iv THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT has the honour to present its THIRTIETH REPORT Pursuant to its mandate under Standing Order 108(2), the Committee has studied the threats to liberal democracy in Europe and has agreed to report the following: v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................... 1 DEMOCRATIC STRAIN AND POPULAR DISCONTENT IN EUROPE: RESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGES FACING LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES ....................................................... 3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Liberal Democracy at a Crossroads .......................................................................................... 4 Possible Causes for Rising Popular Discontent in Europe ............................................... 6 Economic Disaffection and Dislocation............................................................................ 6 Immigration and Identity ...................................................................................................... 7 Digital Distortion and Political Polarization .................................................................. 9 Democratic Strain and Challenges to Liberal Democracy ............................................. 11 The Subversion of Liberal Democracy .......................................................................... 11 Institutional Strain ......................................................................................................... 13 Ideological Challenges to Liberal Democracy ............................................................. 15 The Expansion of Intolerance and Hate................................................................. 17 Responding to the Challenges to Liberal Democracy in Europe ................................ 19 Advancing the Principles of Liberal Democracy........................................................ 20 Reaffirming Multilateralism and International Cooperation ............................... 22 Countering Disinformation and Digital Distortion ................................................... 26 A Final Note on Lessons for Canada at Home .................................................................... 28 APPENDIX A LIST OF WITNESSES ................................................................................................ 31 APPENDIX B LIST OF BRIEFS .......................................................................................................... 33 REQUEST FOR GOVERNMENT RESPONSE ................................................................................ 35 vii LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS As a result of their deliberations committees may make recommendations which they include in their reports for the consideration of the House of Commons or the Government. Recommendations related to this study are listed below. Recommendation 1 The Government of Canada should work with its European partners and allies, including in the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, to reinforce a rules-based international order and to strengthen liberal democratic norms and institutions, and within United Nations fora to reinforce and strengthen a rules-based international order. ....................................................................................................................... 22 Recommendation 2 As part of its international support for democratic development, the Government of Canada should support projects that would strengthen parliaments in European democracies that continue to face challenges as a result of post-Soviet and post-Communist legacies. .................................................. 23 Recommendation 3 The Government of Canada should engage with governments, civil society organizations and academic institutions in Europe to develop new, and to reinforce existing, academic partnerships and youth-oriented exchanges. ................ 23 Recommendation 4 The Parliament of Canada should look to create a youth parliamentary internship program in the House of Commons for nascent democracies which would, over multiple years, provide training in the fundamental principles and practices of liberal democracy. ................................................................................. 24 Recommendation 5 The Government of Canada should review the diplomatic resources earmarked for EU- and NATO-member states, especially in the nascent democracies where additional support for civil society and democratic institutions may be required. As part of this review, the Government of Canada should look at whether dedicated, in-country embassies would better serve these requirements. .......................................................................................................... 24 Recommendation 6 The Government of Canada should increase the financial envelope available for the Canada Fund for Local Initiatives so that Canadian diplomatic missions in Europe can fund projects specifically related to democracy and democratic governance. ............................................................................................................. 24 Recommendation 7 The Government of Canada should enhance its bilateral and multilateral engagement with its European partners and allies in support of democratic governance and peace-building in the Balkans. ......................................................... 25 Recommendation 8 The Government of Canada should, using our electoral missions and practices in Ukraine between 2004 and 2019 as an example, look for opportunities to engage in numerically substantive long-term and short-term election monitoring in European democracies that face challenges as a result
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Canadian Engagement in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
    STRENGTHENING CANADIAN ENGAGEMENT IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA UZBEKISTAN 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Hon. Robert D. Nault Chair NOVEMBER 2017 Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Bucharest Meeting Summary
    PC 242 PC 17 E Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly SUMMARY of the meeting of the Political Committee Plenary Hall, Chamber of Deputies, The Parliament (Senate and Chamber of Deputies) of Romania Bucharest, Romania Saturday 7 and Sunday 8 October 2017 www.nato-pa.int November 2017 242 PC 17 E ATTENDANCE LIST Committee Chairperson Ojars Eriks KALNINS (Latvia) General Rapporteur Rasa JUKNEVICIENE (Lithuania) Rapporteur, Sub-Committee on Gerald E. CONNOLLY (United States) Transatlantic Relations Rapporteur, Sub-Committee on Julio MIRANDA CALHA (Portugal) NATO Partnerships President of the NATO PA Paolo ALLI (Italy) Secretary General of the NATO PA David HOBBS Member delegations Albania Mimi KODHELI Xhemal QEFALIA Perparim SPAHIU Gent STRAZIMIRI Belgium Peter BUYSROGGE Karolien GROSEMANS Sébastian PIRLOT Damien THIERY Luk VAN BIESEN Karl VANLOUWE Veli YÜKSEL Bulgaria Plamen MANUSHEV Simeon SIMEONOV Canada Raynell ANDREYCHUK Joseph A. DAY Larry MILLER Marc SERRÉ Borys WRZESNEWSKYJ Czech Republic Milan SARAPATKA Denmark Peter Juel JENSEN Estonia Marko MIHKELSON France Philippe FOLLIOT Sonia KRIMI Gilbert ROGER Germany Karin EVERS-MEYER Karl A. LAMERS Anita SCHÄFER Greece Spyridon DANELLIS Christos KARAGIANNIDIS Meropi TZOUFI Hungary Mihaly BALLA Karoly TUZES Italy Antonino BOSCO Andrea MANCIULLI Andrea MARTELLA Roberto MORASSUT Vito VATTUONE i 242 PC 17 E Latvia Aleksandrs KIRSTEINS Lithuania Ausrine ARMONAITE Luxembourg Alexander KRIEPS Netherlands Herman SCHAPER Norway Liv Signe NAVARSETE Poland Waldemar ANDZEL Adam BIELAN Przemyslaw
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Centuries of Jewish Heritage in Ukraine: an Interview with Meylakh Sheykhet
    Preserving Centuries of Jewish Heritage in Ukraine: An Interview with Meylakh Sheykhet In February 2011, Mr. Sheykhet, the Director of the Union of Councils for Jews for the Former Soviet Union, visited the Ukrainian Canadian Research and Documentation Centre in Toronto. Mr. Sheykhet has been working for over 25 years on the preservation of sites of Jewish heritage in Ukraine. He lives in Lviv. Interview conducted by Orest Zakydalsky, researcher, UCRDC. Translated from Ukrainian How and why did you start your work? When perestroika started, people began to come out of hiding, their internal hiding. For many living in constant fear lost all sense. People began to organize, to think, to work together. This was and unimaginable joy. I got to know Iryna Kalynets, and many others, and we did a lot together. Back then anyone travelling to Ukraine had to go through Moscow. I had very good contacts in Moscow, and prominent rabbis who had their roots in Ukraine began to visit, and wanted to see what was left of Jewish heritage after communist rule. For the Jewish people, Ukraine is the cradle, where religious movements were founded, where there was a high culture, which was born in Halychyna, in Bukovyna, in Volyn, which continues to nourish the Jewish world with its dignity, its spirituality. And this all came from Ukraine. And so people from the West began to come. And because I was well-known in dissident circles, they came to me. Also, I knew a lot of languages – Yiddish, Ukrainian, English, Russian – I grew up in a multilingual world, and it was easy for me to talk with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada and the Middle East Today: Electoral Politics and Foreign Policy
    CANADA AND THE MIDDLE EAST TODAY: ELECTORAL POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY Donald Barry Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper came to power in 2006 with little experience in foreign affairs but with a well developed plan to transform his minority Conservative administration into a majority government replacing the Liberals as Canada’s “natural governing party.”1 Because his party’s core of Anglo-Protestant supporters was not large enough to achieve this goal, Harper appealed to non- traditional Conservatives, including Jews, on the basis of shared social values. His efforts were matched by those of Jewish leaders and the government of Israel to win the backing of the government and its followers in the face of declining domestic support for Israel and the rise of militant Islamic fundamentalism. These factors accelerated a change in Canada’s Middle East policy that began under Prime Minister Paul Martin, from a carefully balanced stance to one that overwhelm- ingly favors Israel. Harper’s “pro-Israel politics,” Michelle Collins observes, has “won the respect—and support—of a large segment of Canada’s organized Jewish community.”2 However, it has isolated Canada from significant shifts in Middle East diplomacy and marginalized its ability to play a constructive role in the region. Harper and the Jewish Vote When he became leader of the Canadian Alliance party, which merged with the Progressive Conservatives to form the Conservative Party of Canada in 2004, Tom Flanagan says that Harper realized “The traditional Conservative base of Anglophone Protestants [was] too narrow to win modern Canadian elections.”3 In a speech to the conservative organization Civitas, in 2003, Harper argued that the only way to achieve power was to focus not on the tired wish list of economic conservatives or “neo-cons,” as they’d become known, but on what he called “theo-cons”—those social conservatives who care passionately about hot-button issues that turn on family, crime, and defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Master of Public Policy Class of 2020
    Candidate Profiles MCaasntedr oidf Pautbelic PPorloicyfiles MClasste orf o2f0 P2u0blic Policy Class of 2019 Candidate List Student Profiles for the Master of Public Policy Class of 2020 Page 3 Lamia Aganagic Page 45 Nilanee Koneswaran Page 4 Saif-U-Din Alnuweiri Page 46 Rikin Kotak Page 5 Erin Anderson-Birmingham Page 47 Natalie Krzywiecki Page 6 Aryeh Ansel Page 48 Nemesha Kukan Page 7 Victoria Antinucci Page 49 Arpit Kumar Page 8 Shir Barzilay Page 50 Matthew Kupferschmidt Page 9 Jennifer Bocti Page 51 Adam Laughton Page 10 Aidan Carroll Page 52 Lin Ying Lin Page 11 Clarence Chan Page 53 Katherine Lordon Page 12 Jennifer Chew Page 54 Saurav Maini Page 13 Joshua Cho Page 55 Daniella Marciano Page 14 Catherine Clasadonte Page 56 Chloe Marcil Page 15 Chelsea Clifford Page 57 Megan Mattes Page 16 Carly Cook Page 58 Anna Millar Page 17 Olivia Courneya Page 59 Benjamin Miller Page 18 Alexandra De Rosa Page 60 Madison Newton Page 19 Caitlyn Dwyer Page 61 Samantha Nguyen Page 20 Evguenia Ermakova Page 62 Vienna O'Shea Page 21 Arsalan Esmaeili Page 63 Madhav Panday Page 22 Dean Evangeliou Page 64 Ryan Phillips Page 23 Caroline Ewen Page 65 Matthew Quance Page 24 Andre Fast Page 66 Shalini Ramgoolam Page 25 Jolene Funk Page 67 Cherise Regier Page 26 Maya Gajic Page 68 Rachel Robinson Page 27 Natalie Gdyczynski Page 69 Victoria Santos Page 28 Robert Giannetta Page 70 Donya Taghizadeh Page 29 Aneet Gill Page 71 Genevieve Tallmeister Page 30 Luka Glozic Page 72 Sandy Tat Page 31 Alexander Gold-Apel Page 73 Melisa Tica Page 32 Timothy Gopaul Page
    [Show full text]
  • Online Dialogue and Interaction Disruption. a Latin American Government’S Use of Twitter Affordances to Dissolve Online Criticism
    Online Dialogue and Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use of Twitter Affordances to Dissolve Online Criticism Dialogo en línea e interacciones interrumpidas. El uso que un gobierno Latinoamericano hace de las posibilidades tecnológicas de Twitter para disolver críticas en línea Carlos Davalos University of Wisconsin-Madison Orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-1661 [email protected] Abstract: Few academic studies have focused on how Latin American governments operate online. Political communica- tion studies focused on social media interactions have overwhelmingly dedicated efforts to understand how regular citizens interact and behave online. Through the analysis of hashtags and other online strategies that were used during Mexican Pres- ident Enrique Peña Nieto’s (EPN) term to critique or manifest unconformity regarding part of the government’s performance, this study observes how members of a Latin American democratic regime weaponized a social media platform to dissipate criticism. More specifically, it proposes that the manipulation of social media affordances can debilitate essential democratic attributes like freedom of expression. Using a qualitative approach, consisting of observation, textual analysis, and online eth- nography, findings show that some Mexican government’s manipulation of inconvenient Twitter conversations could impact or even disrupt potential offline crises. Another objective of the presented research is to set a baseline for future efforts focused on how Latin American democratic regimes behave and generate digital communication on social media platforms. Keywords: Mexico, citizens, government, social media, disruption, social capital, affordances, weaponization, Twitter, online, criticisms Resumen: Son pocos los proyectos académicos dirigidos a entender la forma en que gobiernos Latinoamericanos operan en línea/Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • I ANKARA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE of SOCIAL SCIENCES
    ANKARA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES FACULTY OF COMMUNICATIONS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVING NEWS TRUSTWORTHINESS IN KENYA AND TURKEY IN THE WAKE OF FAKE NEWS IN DIGITAL ERA. MASTER’S THESIS ABDINOOR ADEN MAALIM SUPERVISOR DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN ANKARA- 2021 i TEZ ONAY SAYFASI TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ (MEDYA VE İLETİŞİM ÇALIŞMALARI ANABİLİM DALI) Dijital Çağdaki Sahte Haberlerin Sonucunda Türkiye ve Kenya’da Artan Haber Güvenilirliğinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi (YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ) Tez Danışmanı DR. ÖĞR. Üyesi ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN TEZ JÜRİSİ ÜYELERİ Adı ve Soyadı İmzası 1- PROF.DR. ABDULREZAK ALTUN 2- DR. ÖĞR. Üyesi ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN 3- Doç. Dr. FATMA BİLGE NARİN. Tez Savunması Tarihi 17-06-2021 ii T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü’ne, DR. ÖĞR. Üyesi ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN danışmanlığında hazırladığım “Dijital Çağdaki Sahte Haberlerin Sonucunda Türkiye ve Kenya’da Artan Haber Güvenilirliğinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi (Ankara.2021) ” adlı yüksek lisans - doktora/bütünleşik doktora tezimdeki bütün bilgilerin akademik kurallara ve etik davranış ilkelerine uygun olarak toplanıp sunulduğunu, başka kaynaklardan aldığım bilgileri metinde ve kaynakçada eksiksiz olarak gösterdiğimi, çalışma sürecinde bilimsel araştırma ve etik kurallarına uygun olarak davrandığımı ve aksinin ortaya çıkması durumunda her türlü yasal sonucu kabul edeceğimi beyan ederim. Tarih: 3/8/2021 Adı-Soyadı ve İmza ABDINOOR ADEN MAALIM iii ANKARA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES FACULTY OF COMMUNICATIONS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVING NEWS TRUSTWORTHINESS IN KENYA AND TURKEY IN THE WAKE OF FAKE NEWS IN DIGITAL ERA. MASTER’S THESIS ABDINOOR ADEN MAALIM SUPERVISOR DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN ANKARA- 2021 iv DECLARATION I hereby declare with honour that this Master’s thesis is my original work and has been written by myself in accordance with the academic rules and ethical requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • UWC Newsletter November
    Dear friends, October was full of amazing events for our global community. On October 17, we hosted the first virtual forum "United by Ukraine" online and live on Ukrainian national TV channels UA:Перший and Mariia UA:Культура. Kupriianova It included inspirational speakers, incredible Executive Director, initiatives and engaging discussions about what Ukrainian World Congress unites the global Ukrainian community and what will guide us in the future. On October 18, at the first virtual Annual General Meeting of the Ukrainian World Congress, over 170 participants from over 30 countries discussed important achievements of 2020 and the future vision for UWC strategy. In October we proudly congratulated the leaders of our communities: Read the UWC - Eugene Czolij, UWC President from 2008- Annual Report 2020 2018, was appointed Honorary Consul of Ukraine in Montreal. Find out more Anna Kisil, Second UWC Vice President – WFUWO Chair, received the Cross of Ivan Mazepa, a recognition from the President of Ukraine, for her significant personal contribution to strengthening Ukraine’s international authority and development of international cooperation and fruitful community work. Read more Congratulations! On October 25, Ukrainians cast their ballots at the local elections in Ukraine. Despite the unprecedented conditions of the pandemic, UWC once again supported the democratic processes in Ukraine and organized the International Election Observation Mission. The UWC Mission is chaired by Borys Wrzesnewskyj, former Member of Parliament of Canada. Natalya Nemyliwska, Director of UWC Economic Prosperity and Investment Committee, is the Chief Observer of the UWC Mission. UWС International UWC International UWC and UCCA Election Observation Election Observation International Election Mission held Mission published its Observation training for interim report.
    [Show full text]
  • 124 CDS 18 E Original: English
    CDS 124 CDS 18 E Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly SUMMARY of the meeting of the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security Column Hall, Sejm & Senate of the Republic of Poland Warsaw, Republic of Poland Saturday 26 May 2018 www.nato-pa.int June 2018 124 CDS 18 E ATTENDANCE LIST Committee Chairperson Joëlle GARRIAUD-MAYLAM (France) General Rapporteur Ulla SCHMIDT (Germany) Sub-Committee on Democratic Governance Rapporteur Jane CORDY (Canada) Special Rapporteur Lord JOPLING (United Kingdom) President of the NATO PA Paolo ALLI (Italy) Secretary General of the NATO PA David HOBBS Member delegations Albania Xhemal QEFALIA Belgium Georges DALLEMAGNE Karolien GROSEMANS Brigitte GROUWELS Bulgaria Milen MIHOV Canada Rachel BLANEY Gwen BONIFACE Jane CORDY Joseph A. DAY Darren FISHER Cheryl GALLANT Pierre PAUL-HUS Vernon WHITE Borys WRZESNEWSKYJ Czech Republic Tomas JIRSA Estonia Kerstin-Oudekki LOONE France Anissa KHEDHER Ronan LE GLEUT Joaquim PUEYO Germany Alexander S. NEU Greece Panagiota DRITSELI Hungary Tamás VARGHA Italy Cristina DE PIETRO Franco PANIZZA Bruno CENSORE Latvia Artis RASMANIS Lithuania Rasa JUKNEVICIENE Mindaugas PUIDOKAS Luxembourg Marc ANGEL Netherlands Marjolein FABER-VAN DE KLASHORST Salima BELHAJ Poland Michal JACH Miroslaw SUCHON Romania Angel TILVAR Slovakia Martin FEDOR Spain Ana Maria BOTELLA Guillermo MARISCAL José Manuel MARMOL 1 124 CDS 18 E Turkey Ertan AYDIN Ziya PIR United Kingdom Baroness ADAMS OF CRAIGIELEA Mary Helen CREAGH James GRAY Madeleine MOON Bob STEWART United States Susan DAVIS James
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cupp Fall 20 0 Newsletter Canada-Ukraine
    FALL 200 NEWSLETTER CUPP CANADA-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY PROGRAM CUPP FALL 200 NEWSLETTER 200 CUPP NEWSLETTER Issue #2 List of CUPP 200 interns and MPs .........3 How impartial is the Canadian Speaker of Parliament? ...........................................5 T. Fox: "Dreams are made possible if you try" .......................................................6 W. Hazlitt: "If you think you can win, you can. Faith is necessary to victory" ...7 Election Lottery of Forecast of Ukrainian Halloween..................................8 Interview with Stig Hedlung, Swedish Local Council Deputy ..............................0 Karatnycky: "Yanukovych earned the benefit of our doubt in those areas CUPP interns in where he has fallen short" ......................2 front of the Motyl: "Would you buy a used car from Parliament of Yanukovych?" .........................................4 Canada. Photo Can One really Compare the EU and credit: CUPP. Russia as Offering Ukraine Similar Opportunities and Benefits? (opinion) .6 Reply to Dmytro Tabachnyk's Interpre- tation of Ukrainian Nationalism ..............6 History of CUPP students an opportunity to work and study in the Canadian Parliament, and "We deliberately isolate ourselves. On July 16th, 1990, the Ukrainian We get information processed by other gain experience from which genera- countries "second hand" ........................8 Parliament adopted the Declaration of tions of Canadian, American and West Sovereignty which declared that Par- Civil Society and Ukraine (Western European students have benefited.
    [Show full text]