University of Toronto POL382H1S Winter 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Toronto POL382H1S Winter 2012 Department of Political Science – University of Toronto POL382H1S Winter 2012 Renewing Canadian Democracy Michael Ignatieff Course Description Is Canadian democracy working? Who is being served and who is being left out? What practical reforms would make our institutions serve our people better? What can we learn from other countries to make Canada a more democratic society? The course introduces students to theories of how democracy ought to work and then takes a critical look at the way Canadian political institutions actually work: the Prime Minister’s office, Parliament, political parties, the federal system, aboriginal self-government, NGO’s lobbying groups and the media. Students will be encouraged to propose and critically examine specific ideas about how to make our political institutions more just, more transparent, more inclusive and more equitable. Biography Michael Ignatieff (Harvard, PhD History, 1976) is the author of The Rights Revolution: The Massey Lectures (Toronto, Stoddart, 2000); Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton University Press, 2001). The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror (Princeton University Press, 2004) and editor of American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (Princeton University Press, 2005). Between 2000 and 2005 he was Professor of Human Rights and Director of the Carr Centre for Human Rights Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Between 2006 and 2011, he was Member of Parliament for Etobicoke Lakeshore, Deputy Leader and Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. For the academic year 2011-2012, he is Senior Resident at Massey College, University of Toronto. Office: Massey College, Rm V12 Office Hours: Wednesday, 2-4pm E-Mail: [email protected] FORMAT AND REQUIREMENTS 1 two-hour lecture per week. Wednesday 10:10-12pm George Ignatieff Theatre Trinity College 1 PREREQUISITE POL 103Y or POL214Y or POL 224Y ASSIGNMENTS Response Memo, 1000 words, due February 15: 25% Class Participation, Blackboard Comments: 15% Final Exam: 60% Students will be asked to participate by responding on Blackboard discussion threads to questions posed each class. Their online involvement, as well as contributions in class, will be monitored and evaluated in the participation component of the course grade. A short, reflective response memo will be due prior to Reading Week. Topics for this assignment will be made available in mid-January. The final exam will encompass all readings and lecture content, including contributions by guest speakers. Papers submitted beyond the due date without the prior approval of the instructor may be subject to a penalty of 2% per day (including weekends). Students are strongly advised to keep rough and draft work and hard copies of their essays before handing them in to the Department. These should be kept until the marked assignments have been returned. Plagiarism is a serious academic offence and will be dealt with accordingly. For further clarification and information, please see the University of Toronto’s policy on plagiarism at http://www.utoronto.ca/writing/plagsep.html. RESPONSE MEMO SUBMISSION Essay submission will be conducted electronically according to the process below. To submit your essay: 1. Prepare your essay in .doc or .rft file format. 2. Upload your paper to Turnitin.com. 3. Forward the email confirmation that you receive from Turnitin.com to [email protected] with your essay file as an attachment 4. You will receive a confirmation email indicating that your essay has been received. If you do not, then please contact me 2 Please note that papers must be received by 11:59 PM on the due date to avoid late penalties, which are assessed at 2% per day unless you have contacted Paul Thomas ([email protected]) prior to the deadline to arrange an extension Appeals Appeals to essay or exam grades must be made by an email containing a one paragraph discussion of why you think the grading was unfair or overlooked some of the material that you presented. Appeals made without such justification will not be considered. BLACKBOARD The course uses the management system Blackboard which helps to establish efficient communication between instructor, teaching assist ant and student, as well as to facilitate class participation. To access the Blackboard-based course website, go to the UofT portal login page at http://portal.utoronto.ca and log in using your UTORid and password. If you need information on how to activate your UTORid and set your password for the first time, please go to http://www.utorid.utoronto.ca. The Help Desk at the Information Commons and telephone assistance under 416-978-HELP can also answer other related questions. Once you have logged in to the portal using your UTORid and password, look for the My Courses module, where you will find the link to this course website along with links to all your other Blackboard-based courses. At times, the instructor or teaching assistant may decide to send out important course information by e- mail. To that end, all UofT students are required to have a valid UofT e-mail address. You are responsible for ensuring that your UofT e-mail address is set up AND properly entered in the ROSI system. ACCESSIBILITY Accessibility Needs: The University of Toronto is committed to accessibility. If you require accommodations for a disability, or have any accessibility concerns about the course, the classroom or course materials, please contact Accessibility Services as soon as possible: [email protected] or http://www.accessibility.utoronto.ca/. READING All reading assignments—roughly 40 pages per week-- are available on Blackboard. You are not required to purchase any texts. 3 Part 1: What is Democracy and Why Does it Matter? Wednesday, January 11 Introduction/What is a democracy? Schmitter, Phillip and Karl, Terry Lynn. "What a Democracy Is... and Is Not." Journal of Democracy 2, 3, Summer 1991. Dunn, John. "Why Democracy?" In Setting the People Free. Atlantic Books, 2005. Part 2: Canadian Democratic Institutions Friday, January 20 *PLEASE NOTE DIFFERENT DAY OF WEEK* The Executive Visit by Hon Bill Graham, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Canada. White, Graham. "Cabinets and First Ministers." In Cross, William (ed.). Auditing Canadian Democracy. UBC Press, 2010. Savoie, Donald. "Primus: There is no longer Inter or Pares." In Governing from the centre : the concentration of power in Canadian politics. University of Toronto Press, 1999. Wednesday, January 25 Parliament Visit by Hon. Peter Milliken, former Speaker of the House of Commons, Canada. Docherty, David. Legislatures. UBC Press, 2005. Excerpt. Wednesday, February 1 Political Parties Cross, William. Political Parties. UBC Press, 2005. Excerpt. 4 Potter, Andrew. "Imagine Throwing a Dinner Party for 30 Million People." Ottawa Citizen. September 29, 2011. Amyot, Grant. "The Waning of Political Parties." In Gagnon and Tanguay (eds.), Canadian Parties in Transition (3rd Ed.). University of Toronto Press, 2007. Wednesday, February 8 Courts and the Charter Morton, Ted and Knopff, Rainer. "What's wrong with the Charter Revolution and the Court Party." The Charter Revolution and Court Party. Broadview Press, 1999. Hogg, Peter and Thornton, Allison, “The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures”, in Paul Howe and Peter Russell 9eds.) Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy, (2001),ps. 106- 111. Wednesday, February 15 Federalism Simeon, Richard and Cameron, David. “Intergovernmental Relations and Democracy: An Oxymoron if There Ever Was One?” In Bakvis, Herman and Skogstad, Grace. Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2002. Smith, Jennifer. “Federalism”. In Cross, William (ed.). Auditing Canadian Democracy. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2010. Wednesday, February 22 READING WEEK Wednesday, February 29 Aboriginal Self-Governance Coates, Ken. "The Indian Act and The Future of Aboriginal Governance in Canada." National Centre for First Nations Governance, May 2008. Papillon, Martin. "The (Re)emergence of Aboriginal Governments." In Bickerton and Gagnon, Canadian Politics, 5th ed. University of Toronto Press, 2009. 5 Section 3: Challenges Ahead Wednesday, March 7 Voter disengagement and the public loss of faith Why are citizens tuning out politics? What can be done? LeDuc, Lawrence, and Pammett, Jon. "Voter Turnout". In MacIvor, Heather (ed.), Election. Toronto: Edmond Montgomery Publications Ltd., 2010. Hardin, Russell “Democratic Participation” in How Do You Know? (Princeton,2009), ps. 60-82. Wednesday, March 14 Democratic participation in an unequal Age Is equal political participation possible amidst economic inequality? Is our democracy serving the common good? Visit by Armine Yalnizyan, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Ottawa Yalnizyan, Armine. "Income Inequality is a Problem for Everyone." National Post, September 20 2011. (http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/09/20/armine-yalnizyan-income-inequality-is- a-problem-for-everyone/) Wilkinson, Richard and Pickett, Kate. "Community Life and Social Relations." In The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. Wednesday, March 21 Media and Public Knowledge What do voters need to know? Is the media serving democracy? What is new media doing to public debate? Visit by Michael Valpy, Globe and Mail. Sunstein, Cass “The Daily We: Is the Internet Really a Blessing for Democracy?”: http://bostonreview.net/BR26.3/sunstein.php Wednesday, March 28 Economic Sovereignty and Governmental Responsibility Does globalization make the sovereign democratic polity unsustainable? Can transnational governance be democratized? 6 Rodrick, Dani. "The Political Trilemma of the World Economy." In The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W.W. Norton & Co., 2011. Clarkson, Stephen and Wood, Stepan. "Rethinking Canadian Governance and Law in a Globalized World." In A Perilous Imbalance: The Globalization of Canadian Law and Governance. UBC Press, 2010. Wednesday, April 4 The Politics of Reform Who does the reforming? And how? Do political institutions allow for the possibility of meaningful reform? Concluding Lecture. No reading. 7 .
Recommended publications
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy
    Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy Annual Report 2019–20 2 munk school of global affairs & public policy About the Munk School Table of Contents About the Munk School ...................................... 2 Student Programs ..............................................12 Research & Ideas ................................................36 Public Engagement ............................................72 Supporting Excellence ......................................88 Faculty and Academic Directors .......................96 Named Chairs and Professorships....................98 Munk School Fellows .........................................99 Donors ...............................................................101 1 munk school of global affairs & public policy AboutAbout the theMunk Munk School School About the Munk School The Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy is a leader in interdisciplinary research, teaching and public engagement. Established in 2010 through a landmark gift by Peter and Melanie Munk, the School is home to more than 50 centres, labs and teaching programs, including the Asian Institute; Centre for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies; Centre for the Study of the United States; Centre for the Study of Global Japan; Trudeau Centre for Peace, Conflict and Justice and the Citizen Lab. With more than 230 affiliated faculty and more than 1,200 students in our teaching programs — including the professional Master of Global Affairs and Master of Public Policy degrees — the Munk School is known for world-class faculty, research leadership and as a hub for dialogue and debate. Visit munkschool.utoronto.ca to learn more. 2 munk school of global affairs & public policy About the Munk School About the Munk School 3 munk school of global affairs & public policy 2019–20 annual report 3 About the Munk School Our Founding Donors In 2010, Peter and Melanie Munk made a landmark gift to the University of Toronto that established the (then) Munk School of Global Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (August 23, 2019 / 12:00:07) 114887-1 Munkschool-2018-19Annualreport.Pdf .2
    (August 23, 2019 / 12:00:06) 114887-1_MunkSchool-2018-19AnnualReport.pdf .1 Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy 2018–19 Annual Report (August 23, 2019 / 12:00:07) 114887-1_MunkSchool-2018-19AnnualReport.pdf .2 The Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy The Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy at the University of Toronto is a leader in interdisciplinary research, teaching and public engagement. Established as a school in 2010 through a landmark gift by Peter and Melanie Munk, the Munk School is now home to 58 centres, labs and programs, including the Asian Institute; Centre for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies; Centre for the Study of the United States; Trudeau Centre for Peace, Conflict and Justice and the Citizen Lab. With more than 230 affiliated faculty and nearly 1,200 students in our teaching programs, including the Master of Global Affairs and Master of Public Policy degrees, the Munk School is known in Canada and internationally for its research leadership, exceptional teaching programs and as a space for dialogue and debate. Visit munkschool.utoronto.ca to learn more. (August 23, 2019 / 12:00:07) 114887-1_MunkSchool-2018-19AnnualReport.pdf .3 Education in Action A place where students and teachers come together to understand and address some of the world’s most complex challenges. Where classrooms extend from our University of Toronto campus around the globe. Research Leadership Attracting top scholars. Examining challenging problems and promising opportunities. Bridging disciplines and building global networks. Public Engagement An essential space for discussion and debate. We invite scholars, practitioners, public figures and the wider community to join us in discussing today’s challenges and tomorrow’s solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Crisis of 2008-09: Searching for a Left Response
    Socialist Studies / Études socialistes 7(1/2) Spring/Fall 2011: 318-328 Copyright © 2011 The Author(s) REVIEW ESSAY The Canadian Parliamentary Crisis of 2008-09: Searching for a Left Response MURRAY COOKE York University Russell, Peter H. and Lorne Sossin, eds. 2009. Parliamentary Democracy in Crisis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN: 978-1-4426- 1014-9. Paperback: 24.95 CAD. Pages: 201. Topp, Brian. 2010. How We Almost Gave the Tories the Boot: The Inside Story Behind the Coalition. Toronto: Lorimer. ISBN: 978-1-55277- 502-8. Paperback: 24.95 CAD. Pages: 192. Is it time to abolish Canada’s ties to the monarchy? Can we move beyond “responsible government” and parliamentary democracy? These are questions raised, perhaps indirectly, by these two books. Following the October 2008 federal election, Canada experienced a remarkable series of political events. Faced with the threat of a non- confidence motion and the prospect of a Liberal-New Democratic Party (NDP) coalition supported by the Bloc Québécois (BQ), Prime Minister Stephen Harper sought and received the prorogation of Parliament after it had sat for a total of only thirteen days. Once Parliament reconvened seven weeks later and the Conservative minority government introduced its budget, the Liberals blinked and the coalition fell apart. Thus, with Governor General Michaëlle Jean’s acquiescence, Harper’s Conservative minority government was able to dodge the non- confidence threat and carry on, subsequently winning a majority government in May 2011. This episode raised serious questions about the practice of responsible government and the role of the governor general (GG).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Canada: an Identity Shaped by Diversity
    11 THE CRIC PAPERS A New Canada: An Identity Shaped by Diversity By Andrew Parkin and Matthew Mendelsohn OCTOBER 2003 Table of Contents 1 Preface 2Introduction 3 PART 1: Diversity Attitudes Toward Diversity The Broad Base of Support Some International Comparisons 6 PART 2: Discrimination Racism and Prejudice Fairness in the Workplace The Police Gender 10 PART 3: Identity National Identity Personal Identity Ethnicity Without Walls Changes in Quebec Religion 18 Conclusion Preface This CRIC paper looks at a country in transformation, METHODOLOGY a Canada where many values and attitudes prevalent 40 years ago have been replaced with a fresh CRIC, The Globe and Mail, and the Canadian Opinion outlook. At the beginning of the 1960s, a majority Research Archive designed the survey. It was carried thought Canada should keep in place the restrictive out between April 21 and May 4, 2003 by Ipsos-Reid. immigration policy that kept non-whites out of the A representative sample of 2,000 randomly selected country.1 Today, such a view would be resolutely Canadians was interviewed by telephone. A survey rejected, as most Canadians, and an overwhelmingly of this size has a margin of error of plus or minus large majority of younger Canadians, not only accept 2.2 percent, 19 times out of 20. The survey sample the country’s diversity, they celebrate it. In fact, included 1,000 respondents between the ages of Canada stands out from other western countries in 18 and 30, and 1,000 respondents 31 years and older. terms of the extent of its comfort with cultural pluralism.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Dickens Opens His Classic, a Tale Of
    Charles Dickens opens his classic, A Tale of Two Cities, by observing: ‘[i]t was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness’.1 Read in a modern context, one could be forgiven for assuming he was talking about minority government. Since 2004, a series of minority governments were elected in Westminster systems. Canada initiated the trend electing a minority parliament for the first time in 25 years. Australia and the United Kingdom quickly followed, electing their own minority parliaments in 2010. Minority governments are not particularly novel outside of the Westminster systems. Indeed, most legislative assemblies operate on some power-sharing agreement between coalition partners. Yet, when they occur in a Westminster system—Canada or Australia—they are news. This is due, in part, to the novelty of the occurrence, since it happens so rarely. In the analysis that follows, I attempt to draw some lessons from the years 2004 to 2011 when Canada elected three successive minority governments. I begin with a discussion of the election campaigns and major events of the 38th, 39th and 40th Canadian Parliaments. I then turn my attention to potential lessons that can be drawn from this seven-year span paying special attention to: political parties, managing parliament, and the importance of the marginal seats. I argue that there are lessons to be learned from other Westminster parliaments when dealing with minority government. Four elections in seven years Like Australia, the Canadian Government is based on the Westminster parliamentary system.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 September 29Th, 2015 Toronto, Ontario Professor Bryan Karney
    September 29th, 2015 Toronto, Ontario Professor Bryan Karney Chair, Presidential Advisory Committee on Divestment from Fossil Fuels Office of the President Simcoe Hall, Room 206 University of Toronto Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1 [email protected] Dear members of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Divestment from Fossil Fuels, We, the undersigned members of the Massey College community, unite our voices to request your committee to unanimously recommend to President Gertler to instruct the University’s investment managers to stop making new investments in fossil fuel companies and to begin to divest from direct stock holdings in fossil fuel companies. Massey College is a cherished and integral part of the University of Toronto community. Our membership represents a diverse and multi-disciplinary community of graduate students, senior scholars, distinguished senior fellows, and eminent members of society beyond the academic world. Prestigious universities like the University of Toronto must rise to the challenge and help lead efforts to stop climate change using the resources at their disposal. By becoming the first Canadian university to divest from fossil fuel companies, in recognition of our shared responsibility to prevent the harmful consequences of climate change, we are convinced that we can set an important example for the rest of the world to rise up to “one of the greatest challenges of our time”.1 On June 4th, 2015, the Presidential Advisory Committee on Divestment from Fossil Fuels published a Consultation Notice and Call for
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian War Museum and the Military Identity of an Unmilitary People
    Canadian Military History Volume 19 Issue 3 Article 3 2010 The Canadian War Museum and the Military Identity of an Unmilitary People Norman Hillmer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Norman Hillmer "The Canadian War Museum and the Military Identity of an Unmilitary People." Canadian Military History 19, 3 (2010) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : The Canadian War Museum and the Military Identity of an Unmilitary People The Canadian War Museum and the Military Identity of an Unmilitary People Norman Hillmer he Canadian War Museum was having invented peacekeeping, and its country’s first national history Abstract: Late in the twentieth politicians for decades after tried to T century, intent on a new vision and museum, but also one of the most repeat his success. There was hardly new building for their museum, neglected of federal institutions. Its Canadian War Museum planners a peacekeeping mission in the second usual fate was pedestrian quarters, crafted an interpretative scenario half of the twentieth century that did meagre financial resources, and a that emphasized the military as a not have Canadian participation.4 miniscule staff. Canada, after all, national symbol and the importance Peacekeeping might constitute a of war and conflict in the shaping of styled itself as the very opposite very small part of the defence budget, Canada and Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Democratic Party and Press Access: Openings and Barriers for Social Democratic Messages
    THE NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND PRESS ACCESS: OPENINGS AND BARRIERS FOR SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC MESSAGES by Ian Edward Ross Bachelor of Arts, University of Western Ontario, 2000 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the School of Communication O Ian Ross 2003 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY September 2003 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL NAME: Ian Ross DEGREE: MA TITLE OF THE NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND PRESS EXTENDED ESSAY: ACCESS: OPENINGS AND BARRIERS FOR SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC MESSAGES EXAMINING COMMITTEE: CHAIR: Prof. Gary McCarron Prof. Robert Hackett Senior Supervisor, School of Communication, SFU - Prof. Catherine Murray Supervisor, School of Communication, SFU Prof. Kenne y Stewart Examiner, B Assistant Professor in the Masters of Public Policy Program at SFU Date: p 2-00? PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my wriien permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Worlds and Local Strongholds in Canadian Federal Politics: Deviations from General Patterns of Party Support in the 2000 Election
    Small Worlds and Local Strongholds in Canadian Federal Politics: Deviations from General Patterns of Party Support in the 2000 Election Munroe Eagles (SUNY – Buffalo) [email protected] and R.K. Carty (UBC) [email protected] Abstract It is striking that in all parties some candidates manage to enjoy local support that is considerably greater than their party's average performance in similar electoral districts. In this paper we identify who these candidates were in 2000 and explore the basis of their success. We begin by developing an ecological model that incorporates a range of socio- demographic, economic, political, and geographic variables to estimate the general pattern of support for each party. The ten most highly positive residuals (the difference between the actual level of party support and that predicted by the model) identify candidates and ridings which did significantly better than they should have. The magnitude of these deviations, and the variety of plausible explanations for them, draw attention to the complexity of Canadian election campaigns, and remind us of the need to incorporate influences from different geographic scales (including the local) if we are to fully understand electoral processes and outcomes. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 30 – June 1st, 2003. Introduction Conventional accounts of federal elections and campaigns in Canada emphasize the importance of national factors in the determination of election outcomes. National party offices develop elaborate marketing schemes and distribute these to their candidates, infusing a national message in all corners of the country (Bell and Fletcher, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing with the Dragon As China Surges to New Heights, Can Canada Keep Step?
    Juggling with genes PAGE 6 $6.50 Vol. 21, No. 3 April 2013 Paul Evans Dancing with the Dragon As China surges to new heights, can Canada keep step? ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Kate Taylor Identity crisis at the museum Wesley Wark Treason for cheap John Burns, Ikechi Mgbeoji and more Writing aboriginal peoples back into Canada PLUS: non-fiction Michael Valpy on the spectre of grassroots racism + Ramsay Cook on Maclean’s and the imperial dream + Terry Fenge on Arctic sovereignty and the Nunavut agreement + Robin Fisher on Canadian anthropology’s New Zealand godfather + Douglas Wright on a post- WWI mathematical peacemaker + Florin Diacu on measuring the heavens fiction Merilyn Simonds reviews Blood Secrets by Nadine McInnis + David Penhale reviews Publications Mail Agreement #40032362 Husk by Corey Redekop Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to LRC, Circulation Dept. poetry Caitlin Elizabeth Thomson + Robin Richardson + Alice Major + Denise Desautels + PO Box 8, Station K Toronto, ON M4P 2G1 Leslie Timmins + Anne Swannell + Seymour Mayne + Dave Margoshes + Allan Peterkin NEW FROM UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Autonomous stAte tHe greAt reVersAl InHerItIng A CAnoe PADDle the epic struggle for a Canadian Car Industry How We let technology take Control of the the Canoe in Discourses of english-Canadian from oPeC to Free trade Planet nationalism by Dimitry Anastakis by David Edward Tabachnick by Misao Dean In this engrossing book, Dimitry Anastakis The Great Reversal takes the reader back to misao Dean explores the canoe paddle as a chronicles Canadian auto industry’s evolution Aristotle’s warning that humanity should never national symbol – integral to historical tales from the 1973 oPeC embargo to the 1989 allow technical thinking to cloud our judgment of exploration and trade, central to Pierre Canada–us Free trade Agreement and its about what makes for a good life.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn Congregation
    THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AUTUMN CONGREGATION FOR THE CONFERRING OF DEGREES THURSDAY, OCTOBER TWENTY-SIXTH NINETEEN HUNDRED AND SIXTY-ONE PROGRAMME OF CEREMONY 0 CANADA 0 CANADA INVOCATION by The Reverend W. S. Taylor 0 Canada! Our Home and Native Land! REMARKS True patriot-love in all thy sons command. by NORMAN A. M. MacKENZIE With glowing hearts we see thee rise, Acting Chancellor of the University of British Columbia The True North, strong and free, CONFERRING OF HONORARY DEGREES And stand on guard, O Canada, by the Acting Chancellor We stand on guard for thee. THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF LAWS Edward A. Corbett 0 Canada, glorious and free! James R. Kidd 0 Canada, we stand on guard for thee! THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE 0 Canada, we stand on guard for thee! Gregoire F. Amyot Albert F. Frey-Wyssling Patrick D. McTaggart-Cowan Myron M. Weaver INTRODUCTION OF THE CONGREGATION SPEAKER by MUSICAL PROGRAMME Dean Geoffrey C. Andrew by CONGREGATION ADDRESS by Dr. Edward A. Corbett THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CONCERT BAND CONFERRING OF DEGREES IN COURSE by the Acting Chancellor CONFERRING OF DIPLOMAS PROFESSOR LESLIE G. CROUCH by the Acting Chancellor ORGANIST GOD SAVE THE QUEEN Reception in the Brock Hall t 2 Klavins, Marta, B.A. (Toronto), Ontario Psychology THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Thesis: "An Exploratory Study of the Adjustment to Hospitalization of Tuber­ culosis Indians." Beg, Mirza Arshad Ali, B.Sc, M.Sc. (Karachi), Pakistan Chemistry Thesis: "The Chemistry of Some Trif luoromethyl-Phosphines'. Kuechler, Hans Albert, B.A. (Brit.
    [Show full text]