DOCSLIB.ORG

Burning in the English Uplands - a Review, Reconciliation and Comparison of Results of Natural England’S Burn Monitoring: 2005 - 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burning in the English Uplands - a Review, Reconciliation and Comparison of Results of Natural England’S Burn Monitoring: 2005 - 2014 Improvement Programme for England’s Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) – Planning for the Future IPENS055 Burning in the English Uplands - A Review, Reconciliation and Comparison of Results of Natural England’s Burn Monitoring: 2005 - 2014 Multiple Natura 2000 sites within the English Uplands First published 09 June 2015 www.gov.uk/government/publications/improvement-programme-for- englands-natura-2000-sites-ipens This project is part of the IPENS programme (LIFE11NAT/UK/000384IPENS) which is financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community’. Foreword The Improvement Programme for England’s Natura 2000 sites (IPENS), supported by European Union LIFE+ funding, is a new strategic approach to managing England’s Natura 2000 sites. It is enabling Natural England, the Environment Agency, and other key partners to plan what, how, where and when they will target their efforts on Natura 2000 sites and areas surrounding them. As part of the IPENS programme, we are identifying gaps in our knowledge and, where possible, addressing these through a range of evidence projects. The project findings are being used to help develop our Theme Plans and Site Improvement Plans. This report is one of the evidence project studies we commissioned. There is a long history of the use of fire as a management tool within the UK uplands and it is supposed that early hunters and farmers used burning to promote fresh growth for the management of prey animals and domesticated livestock. In the last 200 years, fire in the form of rotational burning has mainly been associated with livestock grazing and the management of grouse for shooting. Increasingly, in the English uplands, the emphasis upon burning has been for the management of heather by the grouse shooting industry and in England, this is pronounced in the Pennines, North York Moors and Bowland Fells. Rotational burning is subject to the guidance set out in the Heather and Grass Burning Code which has been through several revisions over time. Many upland areas in England are designated under domestic and international nature conservation legislation designed to protect their nature conservation interest. As a result, rotational burning is an activity that will often require consent from the statutory nature conservation agency for England (Natural England) and payments are also made through agri-environment schemes so that burning is carried out in ways that are intended to ensure environmental benefits. Until recently, we did not have the technical capability for monitoring rotational burning but a method has now been developed that makes this possible. This project has allowed the development of GIS products that can be used to implement a programme of monitoring of rotational burning. This report has two objectives. The first is to provide a summary of the history of rotational burning in the English uplands going back 60 – 70 years. This is to help provide historical context from data on the intensity and scale of rotational burning since World War 2 which can then be compared with rotational burning as is currently practiced. The second objective is to interpret the GIS products from the work and place them in a form that can be readily understood by the non-specialist reader. Natural England Project officer: Alistair Crowle, [email protected] This publication is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence v3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Please note: Natural England photographs are only available for non-commercial purposes. For information regarding the use of maps or data visit www.gov.uk/how-to-access-natural-englands-maps-and-data. ISBN 978-1-78354-213-0 © Natural England and other parties 2015 IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands A Review, Reconciliation and Comparison of Results of Natural England’s Burn Monitoring : 2005-2014 CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands ii IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands A Review, Reconciliation and Comparison of Results of Natural England’s Burn Monitoring : 2005-2014 Submission to Natural England – December 2014 This project is part of the IPENS programme (LIFE11NAT/UK/000384IPENS) which is financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community’ Dr JI Thacker Dr AR Yallop Dr B Clutterbuck CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands iii CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands iv Acknowledgements: The project was funded under IPENS. The Improvement Programme for England’s Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS), supported by EU LIFE+, is a new strategic approach to managing England’s Natura 2000 sites. It will enable Natural England, the Environment Agency, and other key partners to plan what, how, where and when they will target their efforts on Natura 2000 sites and areas surrounding them. This project is part of the IPENS programme (LIFE11NAT/UK/000384IPENS) which is financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. This project was managed by Alistair Crowle at Natural England and we are grateful to him for his comments and guidance throughout this study. Comments on an earlier draft were made by David Glaves at Natural England. Author contact details: Dr Adrian R Yallop [email protected] 07798 558372 CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands v CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands vi Contents Acknowledgements v Contents vii Tables ix Figures xi Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Methods 7 2.1 Data 2.2 Calculation of return periods 9 2.3 Statement on the overall accuracy of management burn estimates and return periods 9 3 Results 11 3.1 National Estimates 11 3.2 Regional Summaries 22 Dartmoor NP 22 Exmoor NP 24 North York Moors NP 25 Northumberland NP 28 South Pennine Moors SAC 30 North Pennines SAC 32 East Lakes 40 Forest of Bowland AONB 41 Shropshire Hills AONB 42 The Quantocks AONB 43 4 Discussion 45 5 References 51 6 Appendices 53 CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands vii CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands viii Tables Table 1 Datasets of burn mapping analysed in this report 6 Table 2 Periods and availability of aerial photography for the national 7 sample. Table 3 Burning in English uplands, sum of all recent burn mapping projects 11 Table 4 Recent burning management by National Park and AONB 12 Table 5 Burning management by SAC and SPA 13 Table 6 Burning management in Bowland Fells SPA 14 Distribution of mapped squares in the updated England sample and Table 7 squares with comprehensive decadal coverage 14 Table 8 Sample squares with evidence of burning, by period 16 Table 9 Dartmoor SSSIs with burning 22 Table 10 Burning in Dartmoor (DSH dominated areas) 22 Table 11 Burning in Dartmoor SACs (DSH dominated areas) 23 Table 12 Burning in Dartmoor SSSIs (DSH dominated areas) 23 Table 13 Exmoor SSSIs with burning 24 Table 14 Burning in Exmoor 24 Table 15 Burning in Exmoor SACs 24 Table 16 Burning in Exmoor SSSIs 25 Table 17 North York Moors SSSIs with burning 25 Table 18 Burning in the North York Moors 25 Table 19 Burning in North York Moors SACs 26 Table 20 Burning in North York Moors SSSIs 26 Table 21 Northumberland SACs with burning 28 Table 22 Northumberland SSSIs with burning 28 Table 23 Burning in Northumberland SACs 29 Table 24 Burning in Northumberland SSSIs 29 Table 25 Burning in the South Pennine Moors SAC 30 Table 26 Peak District SSSIs with burning 30 Table 27 Burning in Peak District SSSIs 31 Table 28 South and West Pennines SSSIs with burning 31 Table 29 Burning in South and West Pennines SSSIs 31 Table 30 Burning in the North Pennines 32 Table 31 Yorkshire Dales NP SSSIs with burning 32 Table 32 Burning in the Yorkshire Dales NP 33 Table 33 Burning in Yorkshire Dales NP SSSIs 33 Table 34 Nidderdale AONB SSSIs with burning 34 Table 35 Burning in Nidderdale AONB 34 Table 36 Burning in Nidderdale AONB SSSIs 34 Table 37 North Pennines SSSIs with significant burning 35 Table 38 Burning in North Pennines AONB 35 Table 39 Burning in SSSIs in the North Pennines AONB 36 CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands ix CS CONSERVATION SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT: IPENS 055 Burning in the English Uplands x Tables cont. Table 40 Comparison of mapping results in the North Pennines AONB for the 2006 and 2014 projects 39 Table 41 Return periods (years) for the common area in the 2006 and 2014 North Pennines mapping projects calculated using 2006 and 2014 methodologies 40 Table 42 East Lakes SSSIs with burning 40 Table 43 Burning in East Lakes SACs 41 Table 44 Burning in East Lakes SSSIs 41 Table 45 Forest of Bowland SSSIs with burning 41 Table 46 Burning in Bowland Fells SPA/SSSI 42 Table 47 Shropshire Hills SSSIs with burning 42 Table 48 Burning in Shropshire Hills SAC 42 Table 49 Burning in Shropshire Hills SSSIs 43 Table 50 Quantocks SSSIs with burning 43 Table 51 Burning in the Quantocks 43 Table 52 Comparison of estimates of burning for a single kilometre square in the English uplands, SD9433 49 Figures Figure 1 Burning in SE0767 between 1955 and 2009 16 Figure 2 Changes in SD6094 between 1945 and 2009. 17 Figure 3 Estimated extent of annual burning on deep peat and other moorland soils, England, 1945-2010 18 Figure 4 Burning in NY9707 between 1948 and 2009 19 Figure 5 Histograms of burning intensity, by period 21 Figure 6 Burning in NZ6102 between 1946 and 2009 27 Figure 7 Burning in NZ0132 between 1957 and 2009 37 Figure 8 Burning in NY9944 between 1951 and 2009 38 Figure A1 Grouse bags and survey data: data from Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust 57 Figure A2 Number of sheep in England and Wales, 1900-2011 57 Figure A3 Area of drainage (km2) installed in an area of western Yorkshire in the 1940s to 1980s 58 Figure A4 Standardised SO2 emissions for western Europe and the UK.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65
    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Landscape Character Assessment: Classification
    LANDSCAPE CHARACTER THE LANDSCAPE CLASSIFICATION The Landscape Classification The County Durham Landscape Character Assessment identifies landscape types and character areas at three different levels - the regional, the sub-regional and the local. Regional County Character Areas Sub-regional Broad Landscape Types Broad Character Areas See Table 1 Local Local Landscape Types See Table 2 Local Sub-types County Character Areas. County Character Areas are based on Natural England’s Countryside Character Areas. There are 6 Countryside Character Areas in County Durham, all of which extend beyond its administrative boundaries. County Character Areas are effectively those parts of Countryside Character Areas lying within the County. The boundaries of County Character Areas are more precisely drawn than those of Countryside Character Areas as they are based on a more detailed level of assessment. In reality the boundaries between these broad landscape zones are often gradual and progressive and difficult to identify precisely on the ground. The character of County Character Areas may differ in some ways from that of the larger Countryside Character Areas to which they belong. The descriptions of County Character Areas given here in the Landscape Assessment may therefore be slightly different to the descriptions given in other publications for Countryside Character Areas. Broad Landscape Types and Character Areas Broad Landscape Types are landscapes with similar patterns of geology, soils, vegetation, land use, settlement and field patterns identified at a broad sub-regional level. As with County Character Areas, the boundaries between Broad Landscape Types are not always precise, as the change between one landscape and another can be gradual and progressive.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Pennines
    LANDSCAPE CHARACTER THE NORTH PENNINES The North Pennines The North Pennines The North Pennines Countryside Character Area County Boundary Key characteristics • An upland landscape of high moorland ridges and plateaux divided by broad pastoral dales. • Alternating strata of Carboniferous limestones, sandstones and shales give the topography a stepped, horizontal grain. • Millstone Grits cap the higher fells and form distinctive flat-topped summits. Hard igneous dolerites of the Great Whin Sill form dramatic outcrops and waterfalls. • Broad ridges of heather moorland and acidic grassland and higher summits and plateaux of blanket bog are grazed by hardy upland sheep. • Pastures and hay meadows in the dales are bounded by dry stone walls, which give way to hedgerows in the lower dale. • Tree cover is sparse in the upper and middle dale. Hedgerow and field trees and tree-lined watercourses are common in the lower dale. • Woodland cover is low. Upland ash and oak-birch woods are found in river gorges and dale side gills, and larger conifer plantations in the moorland fringes. • The settled dales contain small villages and scattered farms. Buildings have a strong vernacular character and are built of local stone with roofs of stone flag or slate. • The landscape is scarred in places by mineral workings with many active and abandoned limestone and whinstone quarries and the relics of widespread lead workings. • An open landscape, broad in scale, with panoramic views from higher ground to distant ridges and summits. • The landscape of the moors is remote, natural and elemental with few man made features and a near wilderness quality in places.
    [Show full text]
  • Wemmergill Estate 25 Year Management Plan
    1 Wemmergill Moor Limited Management Agreement 2017-2042 Stephanie Bird-Halton, Team Leader – Natural England Richard Johnson, Estates Manager – Wemmergill Moor Limited Dave Mitchell, Lead Adviser – Natural England John Pinkney, Head Keeper – Wemmergill Moor Limited Version 2.2, May 2017 2 Contents Page Number Introduction 3 1) The Vision 6 2) Sensitive Features and Sustainable 8 Infrastructure Principles 3) Sustainable Infrastructure 18 Specifications Agreed Infrastructure Map 33 Agreed Infrastructure List 34 4) Vegetation Management Principles 35 5) Bare Peat & Grip Blocking 45 Specifications 6) Monitoring 47 7) Terms & Conditions of the 62 Agreement and signatories References 67 3 Deed of Agreement under Sections 7 and 13 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 THIS DEED OF AGREEMENT is made on the day of 2017 PARTIES (1) Natural England of 4th Floor, Foss House, Kings Pool, 1-2 Peasholme Green, York YO1 7PX ('Natural England'); and (2) Wemmergill Moor Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number 4749924 whose registered office is at O’Reilly Chartered Accountants, Kiln Hill, Market Place, Hawes, North Yorkshire, DL8 3RA (“the Land Owner”). Introduction Wemmergill is one of Britain's most historic and prolific grouse moors, with shooting records that date back to 1843. In the late 19th Century members of the Royal Families of Europe, and MPs were regular visitors during the shooting season, staying at Wemmergill Hall (demolished in the 1980's). Sir Fredrick Milbank MP leased the shooting in the late 1860's when the landowner John Bowes, founder of the Bowes Museum, was living in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGAL EAGLE Voices for the RSPB’S INVESTIGATIONS NEWSLETTER Nature JUNE 2008 No 55
    a million LEGAL EAGLE voices for THE RSPB’S INVESTIGATIONS NEWSLETTER nature JUNE 2008 No 55 Head gamekeeper James Shuttlewood (front) with PC Raspbeary at one of the cage traps holding a live pigeon on the Snilesworth Estate (there was no conviction regarding this trap). Award-winning gamekeeper convicted of illegal trapping James Shuttlewood, head gamekeeper of the Snilesworth fined £100. David Cook, 18, a trainee underkeeper, pleaded Estate, and two of his staff have been convicted in guilty to using two traps and received a 12-month conditional connection with an illegal trapping campaign, involving discharge. All were ordered to pay £43 towards prosecution cage traps baited with live pigeons in North Yorkshire. costs. It was clear that the court took a particularly serious view of Mr Shuttlewood’s involvement, outlining that his On 8 February 2008, three gamekeepers from the Snilesworth staff were carrying out his instructions and that his Estate pleaded guilty at Scarborough Magistrates’ Court to reputation had been tarnished. eight offences under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The head gamekeeper, James Shuttlewood, 40, an The Snilesworth Shoot, managed for the shooting of experienced gamekeeper of over 20 years, pleaded guilty to grouse, pheasants and partridges, operates on the Estate. permitting the use of five illegal traps by his staff, and was American businessman Bob Cieslukowski holds the lease fined £1,250. In 2005, Shuttlewood won a Purdey Game and of the moor, and its management is contracted to Mr Mark Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents
    Contents Appendix 4 1 Data sources 4 2 Allendale Moors 5 3 Alston Shingle Banks 11 4 Appleby Fells 13 5 Arkengarthdael, Gunnerside and Rees Moors 32 6 Arkle Beck Meadows 38 7 Bowes Moor 40 8 Bowlees & Friar House Meadows 46 9 Castle Eden Dene 48 10 Catton Lea Meadow 50 11 Cornriggs Meadow 52 12 Cotherstone Moor 54 13 Cowpen Marsh 60 14 Durham Coast 62 15 Far High House Meadows 65 16 Fothering Holme 67 17 Gingerfields 69 18 Grains O' th' Beck Meadows 71 19 Haggs Bank 73 20 Hannah's Meadows 75 21 Harkers House Meadows 77 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents 22 Helbeck Wood 79 23 Hexhamshire Moors 81 24 Low Redford Meadows 87 25 Lune Forest 89 26 Mallerstang - Swaledale Head 98 27 Mere Beck Meadows 109 28 Middle Crossthwaite 111 29 Middle Side & Stonygill Meadows 113 30 Moorhouse and Cross Fell 115 31 Muggleswick, Stanhope, Edmundbyers Commons & Blanchland Moors 133 32 Ninebanks River Shingle 139 33 Peckriding Meadows 141 34 Rigg Farm and Stake Hill Meadows 143 35 River Eden & Tributaries 145 36 River Nent at Blagill 159 37 Seal Sands 161 38 Seaton Dunes & Common 175 39 South Gare & Coatham Sands 177 40 Swindale Wood 179 41 Tees & Hartlepool Foreshore 182 42 Thrislington Plantation 184 43 Upper Teesdale 186 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents 44 West Newlandside Meadows 210 45 West Park Meadows 212 46 White Ridge Meadow 214 47 Whitfield Moor, Plenmeller and Ashholme Commons 217 48 Williamston River Shingle 224 49 Northumbria Coast EMS 226 50 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast EMS 233 51 North Pennine Moors SPA 241 52 Northumbria Coast SPA (Durham Coast SSSI) 249 53 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast SPA 254 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites 1 Data sources 1.1 Data sources and explanations: "Site Name and Designation" is accompanied by site-specific information on vulnerability taken from the relevant JNCC SAC / SPA data forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Predation Experiment 09.Indd
    Waders on the fringe Why nationally scarce waders flourish on grouse moors www.gwct.org.uk WADERS ON THE FRINGE | 1 2 | WADERS ON THE FRINGE Contents Summary 4 What this means for conservation 5 Rationale – The historical context 6 Part 1 – The Upland Predation Experiment at Otterburn 8 Field work – the annual programme 10 Results – the upland breeding waders 11 Part 2 – What this means for conservation 16 Looking into the future – learning from the past 25 Reference list 26 Appendix – Gamekeeping on grouse moors 27 The full experimental results and analysis of this predation experiment can be found in: Fletcher K, Aebischer N J, Baines D, Foster R and Hoodless A N (2010). Changes in breeding success and abundance of ground-nesting moorland birds in relation to the experimental deployment of legal predator control. Journal of Applied Ecology. In press. Acknowledgements This publication reports the work of: Nicholas Aebischer, David Baines, Julie Ewald, Craig Jones, Kathy Fletcher, Robin Foster, Andrew Hoodless, Nick Sotherton and Stephen Tapper. We acknowledge the financial support from an informal Uplands Funding Appeal chaired by George Winn-Darley and from the Sir James Knott Trust. We would also like to thank Defence Estates, Martin Edgar, Viscount Devonport, the Duke of Northumberland and their tenant farmers for allowing us to do this research on their properties. We also would like to thank a Scientific Advisory Committee, chaired by Dr John Coulson, for its work in guiding and appraising the experiment at Otterburn. Front cover photograph: Golden plover. © David Mason Page 2: Bellshiel study area. WADERS ON THE FRINGE | 3 Summary Gamekeeping and predator control was widespread across Britain in the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65
    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment Hexham Scoping Report Draft For
    Hexham Neighbourhood Plan: Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report Draft for Comment October 2017 Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Hexham Neighbourhood Plan: Scoping Report Quality information Document name Prepared for Prepared by Date Reviewed by SEA Scoping Report for Hexham Town Paul Copeland Ian McCluskey the Hexham September 2017 Council Senior Planner Principal Consultant Neighbourhood Plan Revision history Revision Revision date Details Name Position 1 2 3 4 AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Hexham Neighbourhood Plan: Scoping Report Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Air Quality 6 3 Biodiversity 8 4 Climatic Factors 13 5 Landscape and Historic Environment 20 6 Land, Soil and Water Resources 26 7 Population and Community 31 8 Health and Wellbeing 39 9 Transportation 43 10 SEA Framework and Methodologies 48 11 Next Steps 54 AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Hexham Neighbourhood Plan: Scoping Report Acronyms AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AQMA Air Quality Management Area BAP Biodiversity Action Plan CO2 Carbon dioxide DPD Development Plan Document EU European Union GhG Greenhouse gas emissions IMD Index of Multiple Deprivation LSOA Lower Super Output Area NERC Natural Environment Research Council NEWP Natural Environment White Paper NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NPPG National Planning Policy Guidance NVZ Nitrate Vulnerable Zone SAC Special Area of Conservation SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SPZ Groundwater Source Protection Zone SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest SuDS Sustainable drainage systems UKCP UK Climate Projections WFD Water Framework Directive AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Hexham Neighbourhood Plan: Scoping Report 1 Introduction 1.1 Background The Hexham Neighbourhood Plan (‘The Plan’) is currently being prepared as a Neighbourhood Development Plan under the Localism Act (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Appropriate Assessment Process 3 1.2 Natura 2000 Sites 3
    Contents County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Appropriate Assessment Process 3 1.2 Natura 2000 Sites 3 2 Identification and Description of Natura 2000 Sites 5 3 Description of the Plan 15 3.1 LTP3 Strategy and Delivery Plan 20 4 Methodology: Broad Impact Types and Pathways 21 5 Screening Analysis of Draft LTP3 25 5.1 Goals and Objectives 25 5.2 Draft policies and related interventions in the three year programme 25 6 Assessment of Likely Significance 57 6.1 Assessment of Likely Significance 57 6.2 Other plans and projects 75 7 LTP3 Consultation: Amendments and Implications for HRA 77 Appendices 1 Component SSSIs of Natura 2000 Sites within 15km of County Durham 95 2 Summary of Favourable Conditions to be Maintained, Condition, Vulnerabilities and Threats of Natura 2000 Sites 108 3 Initial Issues Identification of Longer-term Programme 124 County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening Contents County Durham LTP3 HRA Screening Introduction 1 1 Introduction 1.0.1 Durham County Council is in the process of preparing its Local Transport Plan 3. In accordance with the Conservation (Natural Habitats, etc.) (Amendment) Regulations 2010 and European Communities (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and Wild Fauna and Flora, County Durham is required to undertake Screening for Appropriate Assessment of the draft Local Transport Plan. 1.1 Appropriate Assessment Process 1.1.1 Under the Habitat Regulations, Appropriate Assessment is an assessment of the potential effects of a proposed project or plan on one or more sites of international nature conservation importance.
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Plan Local Landscape Designations Review 2019 CONTENTS
    County Durham Plan Local Landscape Designations Review 2019 CONTENTS County Durham Plan Local Landscape Designations Review 1 Introduction Page 1.1 Scope and purpose 3 1.2 Existing Landscape Designations 3 1.3 Historical development of landscape designations in County Durham 4 1.4 Other associated designations 11 1.5 Methodology 14 1.6 Mapping protocols 14 2 North Pennines 15 3 West Durham Coalfield 20 4 Pennine Dales Fringe 27 5 Wear Lowlands 31 6 East Durham Limestone Plateau 38 7 Tees Lowlands 44 8 Proposed Area of Higher Landscape Value 50 Appendices Appendix 1 Local Plan Policies 51 Appendix 2 Character Area Assessments 65 North Pennines 65 West Durham Coalfield 70 Pennine Dales Fringe 83 Wear Lowlands 85 East Durham Limestone Plateau 94 Tees Lowlands 100 1 CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope and purpose 1.1.1 The Local Landscape Designations Review (LLDR) has been carried out to identify potential Areas of Higher Landscape Value for designation in the County Durham Plan. 1.2 Existing Landscape Designations National Landscape Designations 1.2.1 The western part of the County forms part of the North Pennines Are of Outstanding natural Beauty (AONB) which extends westwards and northwards into the counties of Cumbria and Northumberland. This is shown on Figure 1. Local Landscape Designations 1.2.2 Parts of the county are identified as Area of High Landscape Value (AHLV) or Areas of Landscape Value (ALV) in local plans. These are shown on Figure 1. Figure 1.1: National and Local Landscape Designations 1.2.3 The development of Local Plan AHLV are described below.
    [Show full text]