Public Document Pack

Resources Department Town Hall, Upper Street, , N1 2UD

AGENDA FOR THE LICENSING SUB COMMITTEE D

Members of Licensing Sub Committee D are summoned to a meeting, which will be held in on, 5 May 2021 at 6.30 pm.

Link to meeting: https://weareislington.zoom.uk/j/94973494358

Enquiries to : Jackie Tunstall Tel : 020 7527 3068 E-mail : [email protected] Despatched : 27 April 2021

Membership Substitute

Councillor Nick Wayne (Chair) All other members of the Licensing Councillor Paul Convery (Vice-Chair) committee Vacancy

Quorum: is 3 Councillors

Welcome : Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting. Procedures to be followed at the meeting are attached. A. Formal matters Page

1. Introductions and procedure

2. Apologies for absence

3. Declarations of substitute members

4. Declarations of interest

If you have a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest* in an item of business: . if it is not yet on the council’s register, you must declare both the existence and details of it at the start of the meeting or when it becomes apparent; . you may choose to declare a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest that is already in the register in the interests of openness and transparency. In both the above cases, you must leave the room without participating in discussion of the item.

If you have a personal interest in an item of business and you intend to speak or vote on the item you must declare both the existence and details of it at the start of the meeting or when it becomes apparent but you may participate in the discussion and vote on the item.

*(a)Employment, etc - Any employment, office, trade, profession or vocation carried on for profit or gain. (b)Sponsorship - Any payment or other financial benefit in respect of your expenses in carrying out duties as a member, or of your election; including from a trade union. (c) Contracts - Any current contract for goods, services or works, between you or your partner (or a body in which one of you has a beneficial interest) and the council. (d)Land - Any beneficial interest in land which is within the council’s area. (e) Licences- Any licence to occupy land in the council’s area for a month or longer. (f) Corporate tenancies - Any tenancy between the council and a body in which you or your partner have a beneficial interest. (g) Securities - Any beneficial interest in securities of a body which has a place of business or land in the council’s area, if the total nominal value of the securities exceeds £25,000 or one hundredth of the total issued share capital of that body or of any one class of its issued share capital.

This applies to all members present at the meeting. 5. Order of Business

B. Items for Decision Page

1. The Mall, 359 Upper Street, N1 0PD - New premises licence 1 - 150 C. Urgent non-exempt items

Any non-exempt items which the Chair agrees should be considered urgently by reason of special circumstances. The reasons for urgency will be agreed by the Chair and recorded in the minutes. D. Exclusion of public and press

To consider whether, in view of the nature of the remaining items on the agenda, any of them are likely to involve the disclosure of exempt or confidential information within the terms of the Access to Information Procedure Rules in the Constitution and, if so, whether to exclude the press and public during discussion thereof. E. Urgent Exempt Items (if any)

Any exempt items which the Chair agrees should be considered urgently by reason of special circumstances. The reasons for urgency will be agreed by the Chair and recorded in the minutes. ISLINGTON LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEES -

PROCEDURE FOR HEARING LICENSING APPLICATIONS UNDER THE LICENSING ACT 2003

INTRODUCTION TIME GUIDE 1) The Chair of the Sub-Committee will open the meeting and invite all members of the Sub- Committee, Officers, the applicant and anybody making representations, including witnesses (who have been given permission to appear) to introduce themselves.

2) The Chair will introduce the application and draw attention to the procedure to be followed as detailed below.

CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS:

N.B. The Sub-Committee have read all the papers. All parties should use this time to present a summary of their key points and not to repeat the detail already provided in the report.

3) The Licensing Officer will report any further information relating to the application or representations. Where necessary the relevant parties will respond to these points during their submissions.

4) Responsible Authorities to present the key points of their representations; and clarify any points 10 mins requested by the Authority. Witnesses, given permission by the Authority, may appear.

5) The Sub-Committee to question the responsible authorities on matters arising from their submission.

6) Interested Parties to present the key points of their representations; and clarify any points 10 mins requested by the Authority. Witnesses, given permission by the Authority, may appear.

7) The Sub-Committee to question the objectors on matters arising from their submission.

8) The applicant to present the key points of their application, address the representations and clarify 10 mins any points requested by the Authority. Witnesses given permission by the Authority may appear.

9) The Sub-Committee to question the applicants on matters arising from their submission.

10) If required, the Licensing Officer to clarify matters relating to the application and the Licensing Policy.

11) The Chair may give permission for any party to question another party in the order of representations given above.

CASE SUMMARIES 12) Responsible Authorities 2 13) Interested parties mins 14) Applicant each

DELIBERATION AND DECISION 15) The Sub-Committee may retire to consider its decision. The Committee Clerk and Legal Officer will remain with the Sub-Committee. 16) If the Sub-Committee retires, all parties should remain available to provide further information or clarification. 17) The chair will announce their decision giving reasons and any conditions to be attached to the licence. All parties will be informed of the decision in writing. Agenda Item B1 ~ ISLINGTON

Environment & Regeneration Municipal Office, 222 Upper Street, N1 1XR

Report of: Service Director, Public Protection

Meeting of: Date: Ward(s):

Licensing Sub-Committee - D 05/05/2021 St. Peter's

Exempt Non-exempt

SUBJECT: PREMISES LICENCE NEW APPLICATION RE: THE MALL, 359 UPPER STREET, LONDON, N1 0PD

1. Synopsis

1.1 This is an application for a new premise licence under the Licensing Act 2003.

1.2 The new application is to allow:

• The sale of alcohol, which may be consumed on and off the premises on Monday to Sunday from 08:00 until 23:00.

• The permit the following opening hours on Monday to Sunday from 07:00 until 23:00.

2. Relevant Representations

Licensing Authority Yes

Metropolitan Police No Agreed Conditions

Noise No Agreed Conditions

Health and Safety No

Trading Standards No

Page 1 Public Health No

Safeguarding Children No

London Fire Brigade No

Local residents Yes: 7

Other bodies Yes: Ward Councillor

3. Background

3.1 This is new premises licence application for the sale of alcohol for consumption off the premises on Monday to Sunday from 08:00 until 23:00.

3.2 The application was submitted on 23 December 2020 and was submitted in the name of British Overseas Bank Nominess Limited M & G Property.

3.3 The application was put on hold as the legal representative didn’t wish to disclose who the applicant or their client were. The Police originally submitted a representation but this was subsequently withdrawn when the proposed operator Amazon was finally disclosed.

3.4 The application is for an Amazon store using “just walk out technology”.

3.5 The premises is subject to nine representations from the Licensing Authority, Seven local residents, and a ward Councillor. The applicant also received representations from the Police and Noise Team which have been agreed and there conditions are incorporated into the operated schedule at Appendix 3.

3.6 The premises licence holders legal representative has submitted a letter forwarded to local residents in respect of their application which is contained in Appendix 3 of this report. This letter has been supplied to all the residents would have made representations and also included copies of conditions agreed with the other responsible authorities.

3.7 The Licensing Authority has requested clarification on how the “just walk out technology” works in practice for the sale of alcohol. As the time of writing the report no detailed operating plans or procedures have been submitted.

3.8 In addition there is still no proposed designated premises supervisor and Amazon have not been put forward as the formal licensees.

4. Planning Implications

4.1 The planning team have confirmed that all proposed activities fall with in new planning use Class E and are considered to be lawful.

5. Recommendations

5.1 To determine the application for a new premises licence under Section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003.

5.2 These premises are located in the Angel and Upper Street Cumulative Impact Area therefore the Licensing Committee will need to consider Licensing Policy 3, which states Page 2

that there is a presumption of refusal unless the Committee is satisfied that there will be no adverse cumulative impact on the licensing objectives.

5.3 If the Committee grants the application it should be subject to:

i. conditions prepared by the Licensing Officer which are consistent with the Operating Schedule (see appendix 4); and

ii. any conditions deemed appropriate by the Committee to promote the four licensing objectives.(see appendix 4)

6. Reasons for recommendations

6.1 The Council is required to consider this application in the light of all relevant information, and if approval is given, it may attach such conditions as appropriate to promote the licensing objectives.

Appendices:

Appendix 1: application form; Appendix 2: representations; Appendix 3: letter to local resdients; Appendix 4: suggested conditions and map of premises location.

Background papers:

None.

Final report clearance:

Signed by: 16/04/2021 Service Director – Public Protection Date

Report author: Licensing Service Tel: 020 75027 3031 E-mail: [email protected]

Page 3 Appendix 1

Islington For help contact Application for a premises licence [email protected]"ov.uk lSLINGTON 1i Licensing Act 2003 Telephone: 020 7527 3031

• required Information

Section 1 of 21

You can save the form at any time and resume it later. You do not need to be logged in when you resume.

! I This is the unique reference for this System reference . Not Currently In Use . application generated by the system. You can put what you want here to help you Your reference lddc/cb/the mall I ....______, track applications if you make lots of them. It is passed to the authority.

Are you an agent acting on behalf of the applicant? Put "no" if you are applying on your own behalf or on behalf of a business you own or @ Yes 0 No work for.

Applicant Details

* First name IBritish Overseas Bank Nominees Limited J * Family name lw GT C Nominees Limited * E-mail Main telephone number ______, Include country code. Other telephone number O Indicate here if the applicant would prefer not to be contacted by telephone Is the applicant:

@ Applying as a business or organisation, including as a sole trader A sole trader is a business owned by one person without any special legal structure. O Applying as an individual Applying as an individual means the applicant is applying so the applicant can be employed, or for some other personal reason, such as following a hobby. Applicant Business Is the applicant's business G.) Yes 0 No Note: completing the Applicant Business registered in the UK with section is optional in this form. Companies House? Registration number 100220905 01255218 J If the applicant's business is registered, use British Overseas Bank Nominees Limited and its registered name. W GT C Nominees Limited nominees for Business name NatWest Trustee and Depositary Services Limited as Depositary for M&G Property_ I --

Page 4

;:, Qu�t!" � l'linter ,md Corwoller ot IIMSO 2009 Continued from previous page ... VAT number Put "none" if the applicant ic; not registered D l for VAT. Legal status IPrrvate Limited Company Applicant's position in the business ~a~ine_s_s_e_s ______The country where the applicant's Home country I....United ______Kingdom I headquarters are.

Registered Address Address registered with Companies House Building number or name [iioi}, of 250 l Street [Bishopgate ____I District I City or town

County or admirnstrative area ~------' Postcode

Country !united Kingdom

Agent Details

* First name

* Family name

* E-mail

Main telephone number ______,I Include country rode.

Other telephone number

D Indicate here if you would prefer not to be contacted by telephone

Are you.

Ce) An agent that is a business or organisation, including a sole trader A sole trader Is a business owned by one person wrthout any special legal structure. r A private and1v1dual acting as an agent

Agent Business

Is your business registered in (i' Yes (' No Note completing the Applicant Business the UK with Companies section is optional an this form. House?

Registration number

Business name DWF law LLP ] If YC:'Ur business is registered, use its l~------~- registered name. VAT number Put "none" if you are not registered for VAT

Page 5

"'. Q li -,"'11 , Pron Ie r ,rnd c. 1d roll,., a,HMSO 7009 Continued from previou5 page ...

Legal status lumited Liability Partnership I

Your position in the business !Associate Solicitor I I The country where the headquarters of your Home country Iunited Kingdom business is located.

Agent Registered Address Address registered with Companies House. Building number or name I1 Scott Place I Street 12 Hardman Street I District I I City or town jManchester I County or administrative area I I Postcode JM3 3AA I Country Junited Kingdom I

Section 2 of 21 - I PREMISES DETAILS I/we, as named in section 1, apply for a premises licence under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 for the premises described in section 2 below (the premises) and I/we are making this application to you as the relevant licensing authority in accordance with section 12 of the Licensing Act 2003. Premises Address

Are you able to provide a postal address, OS map reference or description of the premises?

c; Address C OS map reference 0 Description Postal Address Of Premises

Building number or name jThe Mall

Street 1359 Upper Street

District IIsl ington

City or town jLondon

County or administrative area I I Postcode INl 0PD I Country Junited Kingdom I Further Details

Te lephone number I I

Page 6 Non-domestic rateable value of premises (£) 1179,000

Section 3 of 21 APPLICATION DETAILS ------In what capacity are you applying for the premises licence?

D An individual or individuals

181 A limited company/ limited liability partnership

D A partnership (other than limited liability)

D An unincorporated association

D Other (for example a statutory corporation)

D A recognised club

D A charity

D The proprietor of an educational establishment

D A health service body

A person who is registered under part 2 of the Care Standards Act □ 2000 (cl4) in respect of an independent hospital in Wales

A person who is registered under Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in l'espect of the carrying on of a regulated D activity (within the meaning of that Part) in an independent hospital in England

D The chief officer of police of a police force in England and Wales

Confirm The Following

12! I am carrying on or proposing to carry on a business which involves the use of the premises for licensable activities

D I am making the application pursuant to a statutory function

O I am making the application pursuant to a function discharged by virtue of Her Majesty's prerogative

Section 4 of 21 NON INDIVIDUAL APPLICANTS

Provide name and registered address of applicant in full. Where appropriate give any registered number. In the case of a partnership or other joint venture (other than a body corporate), give the name and address of each party concerned.

Non Individual Applicant's Name

Name British Overseas Bank Nominees Limited and W GT C Nominees Limited nominees for NatWest Trustee and Depositary Services Limited as Depositary for M&G Property Page 7

-t. Queen·, Printer and Co111roller of HMSO 2009 Continued from previous page.. . Details

Registered number (where !00220905 and 01255218 applicable) I

Description of applicant (for example partnership, company, unincorporated association etc)

I Limited companies acting as nominees

I Address Building number or name [Both of 250 I Street IBishopgate I District I I City or town !London I County or administrative area I I Postcode jEC2M 4AA I Country junited Kingdom I Contact Details E-mail I I Telephone number I I Other telephone number I I * Date of birth 0,0,1 I dd mm yyyy I Documents that demonstrate entitlement to Nationality * I work in the UK

I Md a'hother applicant I Section 5 of 21 OPERATING SCHEDULE

When do you want the premises licence to start? ~/~II 2021 I dd mm yyyy If you wish the licence to be valid only for a limited period, D , 0 , 1 I when do you want it to end dd mm yyyy

Provide a general description of the premises

Page 8

- Queerf~ Printer and Contioller of HMSO 2009 Continued from previous page...

For example the type of premises, its general situation and layout and any other information which could be relevant to the licensing objectives. Where your application includes off-supplies of alcohol and you intend to provide a place for consumption of these off- supplies you must Include a description of where the place will be and its proximity to the premises.

TI1is is an application to bring back into use these premises as a retail store. It is proposed the premises will operate as a retail store from the address comprising a ground floor and Mezzanine level, although only the ground floor will be retail space for the public. The store will be open for the sale of general grocery and home goods. The application is submitted to authorise the inclusion of the ability to supply alcohol for consumption off the premises from a small designated display area in the store as indicated hatched red on the attached plan. The proposed hours and comprehensive operating schedule of conditions look to ensure that promotion of all four licensing objectives will be addressed when the premises are open.

If 5,000 or more people are expected to attend the premises at any one time, state the number expected to I I attend Section 6 of 21 - PROVISION OF PLAYS See guidance on regulated entertainment

Will you be providing plays?

0 Yes @ No Section 7 of 21 PROVISION OF FILMS See guidance on regulated entertainment

Will you be providing films?

O Yes @ No Se.ction 8 of 21 PROVISION OF INDOOR SPORTING EVENTS See guidance on regulated entertainment

Will you be providing indoor sporting events?

0 Yes @ No Section 9 of 21 PROVISION OF BOXING OR WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENTS See guidance on regulated entertainment

Will you be providing boxing or wrestling entertainments?

C Yes C-:: No section Io of 21 --- -· PROVISION OF LIVE MUSIC See guidance on regulated entertainment Will you be providing live music?

C Yes r-: No Page 9

,. Quee11'5 Printe, and Controller of I-IMSO 2009 Continued from previous page... Section 11 of 21 PROVISION OF RECORDED MUSIC See guidance on regulated entertainment Will you be providing recorded music?

O Yes @ No Section 12 of 21 PROVISION OF PERFORMANCES OF DANCE See guidance on regulated entertainment Will you be providin.g performances of dance?

O Yes @ No Section 13 of 21 PROVISION OF ANYTHING OF A SIMILAR DESCRIPTION TO LIVE MUSIC, RECORDED MUSIC OR PERFORMANCES OF DANCE See guidance on regulated entertainment Will you be providing anything similar to live music, recorded music or performances of dance? O Yes @ No Section 14 of 21 LATE NIGHT REFRESHMENT Will you be providing late night refreshment?

0 Yes @ No Set:tion 15 of 21 SUPPLY OF ALCOHOL

Will you be selling or supplying alcohol?

■ Yes C No Standard Days And Timings

MONDAY Give timings in 24 hour clock. (e.g., 16:00) and only give details for the days Start jos:oo I End 123:00 I I of the week when you intend the premises Start I I End I to be used for the activity. TUESDAY Start §o~ End 123:00 I Start I I End I ] WEDNESDAY

Start !os:oo I End 123:00 I Start I I End I I

Page 10

~ Quet'n\ P•mler .ind Controller or HM'>O 2009 Continued from previous page...

THURSDAY Start {os:oo 7 End 123:00 Start C 1 End FRIDAY Start ios:oo End 123:00 ==1 Start I End l I SATURDAY Start [os:oo I End [23:00 ~ Start I I End I __ ] SUNDAY Start los:oo End 123:00 Start End

Will the sale of alcohol be for consumption: If the sale of alcohol rs for consumption on the premises select on, if the sale of alcohol r, On the premises @ Off the premises 0 Both is for consumption away from the premises select off. If the sale of alcohol is for consumption on the premises and away from the premises select both

State any seasonal variations

For example (but not exclusively) where the activity will occur on additional days during the summer months

Non-standard timings. Where the premises will be used for the supply of alcohol at different times from those listed in the column on the left, list below

For example (but not exclusively), where you wish the activity to go on longer on a partic.ular day e.g. Chnslma.s Eve 7 State the name and details of the individual whom you wish to specify on the licence as premises supervisor

Name First name jTo be confirmed l

I Family name bo be confirmed - Page 11

;:. Qu,,.,1·s Vront~, and f.011holler of HM<,O 2009 Continued from previous page... Date of birth □ 1 □ 1 1 I dd mm YYYY

Enter the contact's address Building number or name I I Street I I District I I City or town I I

County or administrative area J I ,Postcode I I Country jUnited Kingdom I

Personal Licence number (if known) I I

Issuing licensing authority (if known) I I

PROPOSED DESIGNATED PREMISES SUPERVISOR CONSENT How will the consent form of the proposed designated premises supervisor be supplied to the authority? 0 Electronically, by the proposed designated prem ises supervisor 0 As an attachment to this application Reference number for consent I If the consent form is already submitted, ask form (if known) I the proposed designated premises supervisor for its 'system reference' or 'your reference'. Section 16 of 21 " ADULT ENTERTAINMENT Highlight any adult entertainment or services, activities, or other entertainment or matters ancillary to the use of the premises that may give rise to concern in respect of children

Give information about anything intended to occur at the premises or ancillary to the use of the premises which may give rise to concern in respect of children, regardless of whether you intend children to have access to the premises, for example (but not exclusively) nudity or semi-nudity, films for restricted age groups etc gambling machines etc. INone

I Se tion 17 of 21 HOURS PREMISES ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Standard Days And Timings

Page 12

:,, Quee11·, Printer and Controller o( HMSO 2009 Continued from previous page...

MONDAY Give timings in 24 hour clock. Start !01:00 I End 123:00 I (e.g., 16:00) and only give details for the days J of the week when you intend the premises Start I I End I to be used for the activity. TUESDAY Start 101:00 I End !23:00 I Start I I End I I WEDNESDAY Start Jo1:oo _I End ~00 I Start I I End I I THURSDAY Start !01:00 I End 123:00 _] Start I I End I I FRIDAY Start Jo1:oo I End 123:00 I Start I I End I I SATURDAY Start Jo1:oo I End 123:00 I Start I I End I I SUNDAY Start 107:00 I End 123:00 I Start I I End I I State any seasonal variations

For example (but not exclusively) where the activity will occur on additional days during the summer months

-

Non standard timings. Where you intend to use the premises to be open to the members and guests at different times from those listed in the column on the left, list below

For example (but not exclusively), where you wish the activity to go on longer on a particular day e.g . Christmas Eve.

Page 13

•i. Qu<•en\ Printer and Controller of HMSO 2009 Continued from previous page...

Section l8 of 21 I LICENSING OBJECTIVES Describe the steps you intend to take to promote the four licensing objectives:

a) General - all four licensing objectives (b,c,d,e)

List here steps you will take to promote all four licensing objectives together.

It is proposed that the conditions listed below would apply to the Licence if granted and these look to address and support the four licensing objectives. The Applicants appreciate the importance of upholding the Licensing Objectives and understands this is an area where cumulative impact is a concern but intends the hours and style of operation and conditions proposed for any operator are designed to address such concerns and hope they will allow the grant of the licence here.

b) The prevention of crime and disorder

A minimum of two members of staff to be present at all times whilst the premises remain open for the sale of alcohol.

At all times that alcohol is being sold from the premises there be either a Personal Licence Holder or a senior trained member of the management staff on duty and capable of being identified by other staff members.

·All staff are to be trained in their responsibilities under the Licensing Act 2003 and training records are to be kept and updated every twelve months and shall, upon request, be made immediately available to Officers of the Police and the Council in either written or electronic form.

Alcohol will be displayed in the area hatched red on the plan. If the premises are open to the public and the alcohol is not available for sale the alcohol will not be available for selection.

CCTV systems will be installed at the premises and will cover the area of the premises that the public have access to with the ability to capture a clear facial image of every person who enters the premises. The images will be retained for a minimum of 30 days and will be made available to the authorities on request subject to compliance with data protection legislation. Signs must be displayed in the customer areas to advise that CCTV is In operation.

The Premises Licence Holder shall not sell super strength beer, lager or cider with an alcohol content above 6.5% abv. This restriction shall not apply in respect of specialist branded premium priced products for example craft ales, local or microbrewery specia list products, boxed gifts or national celebratory commemorative beer, lager or cider with alcohol content of 6.5% abv.

Logs shall be kept and made available to the authorities on request, which will record; (a) All crimes reported to the premises; (b) Any incidents of disorder (c) Any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service

No persons carrying visibly open alcohol vessels shall be admitted to the premises at any time that the premises are open for any licensable activity.

Alcohol sales shall be sold or supplied in a sealed container for consumption off the premises .

c) Public safety

The Premises Licence Holder wi ll observe current Hea lth and Safety and Fire Safety legislation. Page 14

· Qll!:,e-n's Print01 and <_onlwlkr ol I-IM~O 200'1 Continued from prev;ous page ... l I d) The prevention of public nuisance

-- Where the supply of alcohol includes delivery to rhe customer, the licence holder shall ensure that specific procedures are in place and that the activity does not cause nuisance at or near the premises and no deliveries will be before 09.00 or after 21 .00. The Challenge 25 policy will apply to deliveries.

Notices shall be prominently displayed at each exit from the premises asking customers to be considerate to the premises neighbours when leaving.

The area outside the premises shall be regularly checked during the use of the licence and any titter attributable to the premises cleared.

e) The protection of children from harm - The premises will apply Challenge 25 as the age verif1cat1on policy. Where a person appears ro be under the age of 25 Identification in the form of a passport, photo driving licence or other recognised forms of age verification will be sought and if not provided purchase of alcohol will be refused .

Posters should be displayed in prominent positions around the premises advising customers of the proof of age policy in force at the premises.

A refusals book (electronic or hardcopy) should be kept at the premises to record details of all refusals to sell alcohol. This book shall contain the date and time of the incident, a description of the customer, the name of the staff member who refused the sale and the reason the sale was refused. This record should be made available to Police and authorised Council Officers on request.

The Designated Premises Supervisor shall regularly check the refusals book to ensure it is being consistently used by all staff ~ Section 19 of 21 NOTES ON DEMONSTRATING ENTITLEMENT TO WORK IN THE UK

Page 15 ,~ Qu~l'n·~ Pr,nter and Co ,,t rollu ol HMSO J009 Continued from previous page ...

Address

Building number or name

Street

District

City or town

County or administrative area ~------~ Postcode

Country [united Kingdom

DECLARATION [Applicable to individual applicants only, including those in a partnership which is not a limited liability partnership] I * understand I am not entitled to be issued with a licence if I do not have the entitlement to live and work In the UK (or if I am subject to a condition preventing me from doing work relating to the carrying on of a licensable activity) and that my licence will become invalid if I cease to be entitled to live and work in the UK (please read guidance note 15). The DPS named in this application form is entitled to work in the UK (and is not subject to conditions preventing him or * her from doing work relating to a licensable activity) and I have seen a copy of his or her proof of entitlement to work, if appropriate (please see note 15)

~ Ticking this box indicates you have read and understood the above declaration

This section should be completed by the applicant, unless you answered "Yes" to the question "Are you an agent acting on behalf of the applicant?"

* Full name

* Capacity ) ~ hu\.tJ o- ~ CA.(n

Once you're finished you need to do the following: 1. Save this form to your computer by clicking file/save as ... 2. Go back to htrns / /www.qoy.ukh pQ.[y-f I a-hce11ce1txemlses-1fcence/J.slln..ruQo/aµply___l to upload this file and continue with your application. Don't forget to make sure you have all your supporting documentation to hand.

IT IS AN OFFENCE LIABLE TO SUMMARY CONVICTION TO A FINE OF ANY AMOUNT UNDER SECTION 158 OF THE LICENSING ACT 2003, TO MAKE A FALSE STATEMENT IN OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS APPLICATION

IT IS AN OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 24B OF THE IMMIGRATION ACT 1971 FOR A PERSON TO WORK WHEN THEY KNOW, OR HAVE REASONABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE, THAT THEY ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM DOING SO BY REASON OF THEIR IMMIGRATION STATUS. THOSE WHO EMPLOY AN ADULT WITHOUT LEAVE OR WHO IS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS TO EMPLOYMENT WILL BE LIABLE TO A CIVIL PENALTV UNDER SECTION 15 OF THE IMMIGRATION, ASYLUM ANO NATIONALITY ACT 2006 AND PURSUANT TO SECTION 21 OF THE SAME ACT, WILL BE COMMITTING AN OFFENCE WHERE THEY DO SO IN THE KNOWLEDGE, OR WITH REASONABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE, THAT THE EMPLOYEE IS DISQUALIFIED

Page 16 i:i======r::======t:==~~~~=-=-======ifl ::==-:::-;:-­ MPffl11€{Qlbffli'lPI~l 9¥: 'NJ!GJ:»OO:mtii!~OOI!!'.99'ft EXTERIOR ELEVAllON LEGEND ~I..Pe. il'VH'ICN.Y ------!l0$flNQ~ IMJ..~ ...... ~IMICMIJ

~•~·•·•iilCWQllfl,Aa:9!R:111,oJE.511i•UH I<>------­ ~,~AllQA.tia.a:a------. .-,0111 O'IDrllOI TO~ leona deS,gn arctJUlCIS .ARCHITECTIJRAL KEYNOTES ►_,,_._ _ _ _ a.t",,_MM,Bl~ISJ~l(I~ __ ~ ~(i()C0S.E(lAl:.SS~MJt~a.#il ,,.1, 1 Qla"NO~RE:lll,li,l,l, fllltO'l!Cf~~ p.auc..11.0,...:ic,1 ,.,H ~a,QIIFMH~,,...r~rwwQQQ)l~OCDIIN

==:.=.:=:"::.:.·.=:= ~ c.,v." do,r~ <.1- f--ll?\. ,c. a.,-e..,, - rc.Fi...LI \;(7 "• (..C ~s#~ Page 17 Page C4 PROPOSED PLAN • MEZZANL'lE LEVEL - PLANNING -

-­waca ·­~--­-·......

.M.L~~tC'~MD---- -' --~filOCDit.PU:mCIII ~ 0 TRIJENORTli PLAN NORTH -·· ~~•aaa i NXII 111.M • ,.__ I A4 PL-103 Appendix 2

Reps word Rep 1 Dear licensing team, I find this application curiously opaque. Do we usually accept applications where the named applicant is a legal agent for the occupant? I would have thought the licensing committee would want to know who the operator is in order to consider this. Thanks.

Regards,

Councillor Martin Klute Labour Member for St. Peters Ward London Borough of Islington Chair: Planning Committee

Rep 2 Objection to Licence

Public Nuisance

The premises licence applied for by the applicant states that the premises will open Monday-Sunday from 07.00 to 23.00 requesting licence for sale of alcohol, to be consumed “off” the premises, from 08.00 to 23.00 Monday-Sunday. The premises is situated in the Angel and Upper Street Cumulative Impact Area of Islington. Islington High Street, Camden Passage and Upper Street have multiple licensed premises. The Council's Licensing Policy 3 is that there is presumption against the grant of additional licences if there is any objection unless the applicant demonstrates that there will be NO negative cumulative impact. The applicant has not demonstrated that. Adding a further off licence premises must contribute to problems relating to the licensing objectives.

Although the licensed premises in Islington High Street are “on” licences, Licensing Policy 4 creates a similar rebutable presumption of refusal in relation to "off sales" by shops. In close proximity to the premises there are 4 major supermarkets, Marks&Spencer, Waitrose, Sainsbury’s & Tesco’s, each selling alcohol for consumption off the premises. The proposed enterprise must compete with those supermarkets on price but it can sell single units of beer/cider generally unavailable in supermarkets. Such sales will be purchased for immediate consumption “on” the

Page 18 street. It is axiomatic that street drinking will create local public nuisance, viz begging for money, street urination, inebriated behaviour, accosting of passers-by, litter and disagreeable circumstances for local residents, together classed as anti-social behaviour. Even now drinkers at the adjoining drink on our front door steps in the spring and summer months. The premises are also in close proximity to a school (which is contrary to para 73 (c) of the policy).

Crime and Disorder

A local convenience store selling alcohol throughout the day and night has the potential to attract addicts, both of alcohol and other drugs. Such persons are prone to begging and/or resorting to other criminal measures to fund their habit. This behaviour causes public disorder with associated problems for residents, businesses and visitors to Islington.

Protection of children from harm

Sale of alcohol to persons under the age of 18 years is prohibited by law. Outlets such as the proposed premises act as a magnet to under-age children for whom the drinking of alcohol is attractive, adult and daring. The presence of a 15/7 convenience store at the heart of the Angel could prove alluring to certain children who can rely on “helpful” adults to buy units of alcohol on their behalf.

We object to the grant of the requested premises licence in respect of the above licensing objectives

Rep 3 Objection to Licence Application

Premises name & address The Mall 359 Upper Street Islington London

Objector’s name

Page 19 Interest Resident

Address

Public Nuisance

The premises licence applied for by the applicant states that the premises will open Monday-Sunday from 07.00 to 23.00 requesting licence for sale of alcohol, to be consumed “off” the premises, from 08.00 to 23.00 Monday-Sunday. The premises is situated in the Angel and Upper Street Cumulative Impact Area of Islington. Islington High Street, Camden Passage and Upper Street have multiple licensed premises. Adding a further off licence premises must contribute to problems relating to the licensing objectives.

Admittedly, the licensed premises in Islington High Street are “on” licences however in close proximity to the premises there are 4 major supermarkets, Marks&Spencer, Waitrose, Sainsbury’s & Tesco’s, each selling alcohol for consumption off the premises. The proposed enterprise must compete with those supermarkets on price but it can sell single units of beer/cider generally unavailable in supermarkets. Such sales will be purchased for immediate consumption “on” the street. It is axiomatic that street drinking will create local public nuisance, viz begging for money, street urination, inebriated behaviour, accosting of passers-by, litter and disagreeable circumstances for local residents, together classed as anti-social behaviour.

Crime and Disorder

A local convenience store selling alcohol throughout the day and night will attract addicts, both of alcohol and other drugs. Such persons are prone to begging and/or resorting to other criminal measures to fund their habit. This behaviour causes public disorder with associated problems for residents, businesses and visitors to Islington.

Protection of children from harm

Page 20 Sale of alcohol to persons under the age of 18 years is prohibited by law. Outlets such as the proposed premises act as a magnet to under-age children for whom the drinking of alcohol is attractive, adult and daring. The presence of a 15/7 convenience store at the heart of the Angel could prove alluring to certain children who can rely on “helpful” adults to buy units of alcohol on their behalf.

I object to the grant of the requested premises licence in respect of the above licensing objectives.

Rep 4

Objection to Licence Application

Premises name & address The Mall 359 Upper Street Islington London

Objectors' names

Interest Residents

Address

Public Nuisance

The premises licence applied for by the applicant states that the premises will open Monday-Sunday from 07.00 to 23.00 requesting licence for sale of alcohol, to be consumed “off” the premises, from 08.00 to 23.00 Monday-Sunday. The premises is situated in the Angel and Upper Street Cumulative Impact Area of Islington. Islington High Street, Camden Passage and Upper Street have multiple licensed premises. The Council's Licensing Policy 3 is that there is presumption against the grant of additional licences if there is any objection unless the applicant demonstrates that there will be NO negative cumulative impact. The applicant has not demonstrated that. Adding a further off licence premises must contribute to problems relating to the licensing objectives.

Page 21 Although the licensed premises in Islington High Street are “on” licences, Licensing Policy 4 creates a similar rebutable presumption of refusal in relation to "off sales" by shops. In close proximity to the premises there are 4 major supermarkets, Marks&Spencer, Waitrose, Sainsbury’s & Tesco’s, each selling alcohol for consumption off the premises. The proposed enterprise must compete with those supermarkets on price but it can sell single units of beer/cider generally unavailable in supermarkets. Such sales will be purchased for immediate consumption “on” the street. It is axiomatic that street drinking will create local public nuisance, viz begging for money, street urination, inebriated behaviour, accosting of passers-by, litter and disagreeable circumstances for local residents, together classed as anti-social behaviour. Even now drinkers at the adjoining pub drink on our front door steps in the spring and summer months. The premises are also in close proximity to a school (which is contrary to para 73 (c) of the policy).

Crime and Disorder

A local convenience store selling alcohol throughout the day and night has the potential to attract addicts, both of alcohol and other drugs. Such persons are prone to begging and/or resorting to other criminal measures to fund their habit. This behaviour causes public disorder with associated problems for residents, businesses and visitors to Islington.

Protection of children from harm

Sale of alcohol to persons under the age of 18 years is prohibited by law. Outlets such as the proposed premises act as a magnet to under-age children for whom the drinking of alcohol is attractive, adult and daring. The presence of a 15/7 convenience store at the heart of the Angel could prove alluring to certain children who can rely on “helpful” adults to buy units of alcohol on their behalf.

We object to the grant of the requested premises licence in respect of the above licensing objectives.

Page 22 Rep 5 Licensing Act 2003

Licensing Authority Representation

Premises Licence Application:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street N1 0PD

I am submitting a representation on behalf of the Licensing Authority with respect to the premises licence application, submitted by British Oversees Bank Nominees Limited/WGTC Nominees Ltd

The application is seeking permission for the sale of alcohol off the premises from 0800 to 2300 Monday to Sunday.

The grounds for the representation are:

• Prevention of Crime & Disorder;

• Prevention of Public Nuisance.

Licensing Policy Considerations

Licensing Policies 2 & 3 Location, Cumulative impact and saturation

Licensing Policy 4 Shops selling alcohol

Licensing Policy 8 Management Standards

Licensing Policy 14 Alcohol induced Crime, Disorder and Antisocial Behaviour

Issues of Concern

• The premises are situated within a Cumulative Impact area as detailed within the Council’s Licensing Policy. This special policy creates a rebuttable presumption that any application for the grant of a new premises licence within such an area, will normally be refused following the receipt of representations, unless the applicant can demonstrate that the granting of such will have no negative cumulative impact on one or more of the licensing objectives.

• The Licensing Authority have concerns that the application being sought in this case is vague in regards to the precise nature of the business, specifically in regards to the proposed retailer themselves. While the Operating Schedule does include some controls we would expect without full disclosure of the operator and without the naming of a Designated Premises Supervisor, the Licensing Authority cannot be satisfied that the licensing objectives will be upheld or that expected high standards of management will be met.

• The applicant is currently an off shore company. As a licensing authority we have found dealing and corresponding with off shore companies on licensing matters extremely complicated. It is also clear that an off shore company has no intention of operating the premises for licensable activities. Page 23 • We have asked the legal representative to inform us who the intended final operative is and they have refused to provide this information. We would therefore prefer that this application is simply withdrawn and a new application is submitted in the name of the company that would like to provide licensable activities at the site.

• In addition the premises are located within the Angel and Upper Street Cumulative Impact policy area. One of the main issues of concern is the number of off licences operating in the area and the impact that widely available alcohol is having on local residents in terms of nuisance, crime and disorder, street drinking and associated antisocial behaviour.

• The onus is on the applicant to demonstrate that these premises will not add to the cumulative impact. Without providing details of who the operator will be it is impossible for this rebuttable to be made.

Summary

The applicant must demonstrate a rebuttal of the Council Licensing Policy concerns regarding the problems and issues of operating in a Cumulative Impact area.

If Members of the Licensing Sub Committee are not satisfied that the applicant will operate to the highest standards of management, as outlined in Licensing Policy 8, it is recommended that the application be refused.

Terrie Lane Licensing Manager 20 January 2021

Page 24 Rep 6

Licensing Act 2003 representation pro-forma

Should you wish to comment on the licence application please use this form to help you. Please feel free to attach additional sheets. You do not have to make any comment, and comments may be made in support of as well as against the application, providing they refer lo one or more or the licensing objectives (please see the guidance notes for further advice). Premises

Interest:

Please comment on the licensing objectives below relevant to your concerns or observations, you may also wish to include suggestions how your concerns could be addressed:

Crime and Disorder

Page 25 Protection of Ch ildren from Harm

Public Safety

I wish my identi ty to be kept anonymous: Yes !@ We will treat representations as anonymous where there is a genuine reason to do so; if yo u wish your name and address details to be withheld then please explain the reason:

Copies of this representation will be sent to the applicant. or their agenl/solici tor, including name and address details (but other personal contact information such as telephone numbers and email addresses will be removed) unless you have specifically requested anonymity. Copies of this representation will be included in a report that will be available to the public and will be published on the internet; however, the published on-line version of the report will have name and addres · Signature:

Return to: Licensing Service Licensing Team, Islington Council, 3rd Floor, 222 Upper St, London , N 1 1 Or by email to : licensinq@islinqton .gov.uk

Page 26 Rep 7 Licen,sing Act 2003 representation pro-forma •

Should you wish to comment on the licence application please use this form to help you. Pfease feel free to attach additional sheets. You_do not hav~ to ~ake any ~omment, and comments may be m~de i~ sup~ort ?fas well as against the application, providing they refer to one or more of the hcensrng objectives (pleas see the guidance notes for further advice). · e Premises Name and address: The Mall, 359 Upper Street, Islington, London

Your Nam,e: Interest: (E.g. resident, business, TRA Chair, CouncUlor, solicitor) Your Address:

Emai Tele

Please comment on the Hcensing ob· t· . you may also wish to include suggei;i ivehs below rele~ant to your concerns or observations, . ns ow your concerns could -be addressed: Public ,Nuisance I ~ b ·e.c:h~Hu. ....~ · · O!\, cu~~ \u ~ -~ •

• ~ _,. • ~n ~ Y\a\k ~ ~• DAI - • • • .·~ - I WUl.k.

Page 27 Protection of Children from Harm

1Public Safety

I wish my identity to be kept an;onymous: Yes ,1-Jo ·· \,.~

We wjfl treat re,presentat1ons. as anonymo1 us where there is a g,enuine reason to do so; if you wish your name and ad·dress detaHs to be withheld then please explain the reason:

Copies of thj's re,pre.sen1 tation will be senit to the app.licant, or their1 agent/so\icitor, includ\ng name and address deta,ils (but lather person·al contact information· su1ch as tel.ephone numbers and email addresses will' be removed) unfess you have specif,icatly requested, anonymity. Copies of

this .representati,on will b1e inc.lud 1e1d in a report that win b,e available to the public and wi\t be pubJished on th,e intern,et; h.owever, the published on-li1ne vers,ion of the report will have name and addre.ss ,details re . . · Signature: ______Date. -----=------Q ' / 0 I / '.lo Please ens ress details completed above Return to: • Licensing Service Licensing Team, Islington Council 3 d Fl , .. Or by email to licensing@islingto~.g~v. u~or, 222 Upper St, London, N 1 1XR.

Page 28 Appendix 3 0WFLawLLP 5 St Paul's Square Old Hall Street Liverpool L3 9AE DX 14128 Liverpool T +44 (0)333 320 2220 F +44 (0)333 320 4440 www.dwf.law

Your Ref:

Our Ref: DDCIThe MalV Please quote this when replying

Date: 9 March 2021

Please ask for: David Crank Ext: 683381 Direct Dial: +44 1519073381 E-mail: David.Crank@dwf law Direct Fax:

Dear Sir, Madam

Premises Licence application- The Mall, 359 Upper Street Islington London N1 OPD

I am instructed to write on behalf of the Applicants of the above address to provide further information in relation to the application for an Alcohol Premises Licence at these premises.

I can confirm that the operator of the retail shop at the Mall will be Amazon. Amazon intend to operate the store in a similar way. to the Amazon Fresh store that opened in Ealing last Thursday. The principal products sold will be grocery and home goods, as well as food to go, coffee and freshly baked items.

In providing this information it is hoped that it will provide some reassurance that the premises will be operated in a manner that will uphold the licensing objectives. t appreciate there was some uncertainty as to the type of premises that would be operated, but I can confirm there will be no onsite consumption of alcohol.

The intention is that the store will provide a new seamless shopping experience for customers through the operation of the "Just Walk Out" technology. It will be necessary to have the Amazon App (and to have confirmed a method of payment) in order to enter the premises.

A concern about the impact on children has been expressed by some and this is recognised, and addressed, in the proposed conditions that have now been agreed with Metropolitan Police and Environmental Protection (a copy of which are attached). These confirm that the premises will operate a Challenge 25 Policy at all times. As agreed with the police the premises will have provision for CCTV to discourage those who behave in an anti-social manner.

It is Amazon's intention to operate within all the proposed conditions and the store will not be an operation that would harm the licensing objectives It would also be the Applicant's intention as Landlords to ensure that the premises are responsibly run.

In providing this information we wonder if you would wish to review your representation

7 4!>43083-1

OWF Law LLP 1s a 1rm1ted l1ab111ly parlr.ersh1p registered 1n (tlglanu and Wales wjth reg1sterArt nu1Y1be1 OC47336'1 DWF law LLP is authoriseQfs of DW F Law LLP and of Non-Members who arc designated as Partner-s ,, open lo inspection a, lls ,ey,ste-red offi<:e locar~iempt Pfofess1ooal r,fm able lo carry ovl certain insuranc.e 111edj~•,ori act1~••l1 e!i (regulated by lhe Sohc,1c•s F{c:(1~ 11<111-0,1 AuH10· 1t~I 9 March 2021

If we can assist further or provide any additional reassurance then please contact me.

Yours faithfully

David Crank Senior Associate for DWF Law LLP

Page2 30

74543083-1 Appendix 4

Suggested conditions of approval consistent with the operating schedule 1. A minimum of two members of staff to be present at all times whilst the premises remain open for the sale of alcohol. (the applicant proposes to increase this to a minimum of three members of staff). 2. At all times that alcohol is being sold from the premises there be either a Personal Licence Holder or a senior trained member of management staff on duty and capable of being identified by other staff members. 3. Alcohol will be displayed in the area hatched red on the plan. If the premises are open to the public and the alcohol is not available for sale the alcohol will not be available for selection. 4. No persons carrying visibly open alcohol vessels shall be admitted to the premises at any time that the premises are open for any licensable activity. 5. Alcohol sales shall be sold or supplied in a sealed container for consumption off the premises. 6. No more than 10% of the retail area shall be used for the sale or display of alcohol. 7. This Premises Licence has no effect until the Licence has been transferred to Amazon UK Services Limited. 8. At all times the designated alcohol area is open and alcohol is available for sale a dedicated member of staff shall be present to supervise the alcohol area and carry put Challenge 25 age verification checks on customers entering that area. Conditions of approval agreed with the Metropolitan Police 9. In the event that crime or serious disorder is, or appears to have been committed on the premises, the management will immediately ensure that: a. The police and, where appropriate, the London Ambulance Service, are called immediately; b. As far as is safe and reasonable practicable, all measures will be taken to apprehend any identified suspects pending the arrival of the police; c. As far as is safe and reasonable practicable, all measures will be taken to preserve any identified crime scene pending the arrival of the police; d. Any and all appropriate measures are taken to fully protect the safety of all persons present on the premises at all times during operating hours. 10. An incident log [electronic or hard copy] shall be kept at the premises, and made available on request to the police or an authorised officer, which will record: a. Any and all allegations of crime or disorder reported at the venue; b. Any and all complaints received by any party; c. Any faults in the CCTV system; d. Any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service; e. Any and all ejections of patrons; f. Any refusal of the sale of alcohol. The refusals log part of the incident book shall be checked and approved monthly by the designated premises supervisor.

Page 31

11. CCTV shall be installed, operated, and maintained, to function all times that the premises are open for licensable activities. This CCTV shall comply with the following criteria: a. The licensee will ensure that the system is checked every two weeks to ensure that the system is working properly and that the date and time are correct; b. A record of these checks, showing the date and name of the person checking, will be kept and made available to the police or other authorised officer on request; c. The Police will be informed if the system will not be operating for longer than one day of business for any reason; d. One camera will show a close-up of the entrance to the premises, to capture a clear, full length image of anyone entering; e. The system will provide full coverage of the interior of the premises and any exterior part of the premises accessible to the public; f. The system will record in real time and recordings will be date and time stamped; g. At all times during operating hours, there will be at least 1 member of staff on the premises who can operate the system sufficiently to allow Police or authorised Council officers to view footage on request; and h. Recordings will be kept for a minimum of 31 days and downloaded footage will be provided free of charge to the police or other authorised officers on request (subject to the Data Protection Act 1998) within 24 hours of any request. 12. Challenge 25 shall be operated as the proof of age policy and only a valid passport, photo driving licence, HM forces photographic ID card or proof of age card with the PASS logo or hologram on it may be accepted as proof of age. 13. A notice will be displayed at the till either electronically or physically to remind staff to ask for identification. 14. The licence holder shall ensure that all staff are trained on relevant matters, including the conditions of the premises licence, age restricted products and [if they are ever left in charge of the shop] the operation of the CCTV system and how to deal with visits from authorised officers. The licence holder shall keep written records of training and instructions given to each member of staff, detailing the areas covered to include the Licensing Objectives, identifying persons under 25, making a challenge, acceptable proof of age & checking it, making & recording a refusal, avoiding conflict & responsible alcohol retailing. Staff shall sign to confirm that they have received and understood the training. 15. All staff who work at the till will be trained for their role on induction and be given refresher training every 12 months. 16. The written training records kept for each staff member will be produced to police & authorised council officers on request. 17. The licence holder will at all times maintain adequate levels of staff and security. Such staff and security levels will be disclosed, on request, to the Licensing Authority and the Police. 18. There will be no sales/supplies of beers, ales, lagers, or ciders or anything similar of 6.5% ABV or above save for premium products which have been agreed with the police [email authority will suffice]. 19. The premises will not sell/supply miniature bottles of spirits of 50ml or less save for premium products which have been agreed with police or as part of seasonal gift packs [email authority will suffice]. Page 32

20. Notices will be prominently displayed by the entry/exit, detailing: a. That CCTV is in use & a Challenge 25 proof of age policy is in operation; b. Advising customers of the provisions of the Licensing Act regarding underage & proxy sales; c. The permitted hours for licensable activities & the opening times of the premises; d. Not to drink in the street; and e. To respect residents, to leave quietly, and not to loiter outside the premises or in the vicinity and to dispose of litter legally. 21. The premises licence holder shall endeavour to eliminate or minimise any nuisance arising out of its licensable activities. In doing so the premises licence holder will work with enforcement authorities where any issues are identified. A complaints procedure will be maintained in order that local residents have a means of contact if necessary. A telephone number for the duty manager at the premises shall be publically available at the times the premises is open. The telephone number is to be made available to residents and businesses in the vicinity. 22. Regarding any off sales for delivery or, made by way of internet orders, the following will be adhered to: a. No alcohol delivery unless ancillary to a food or other grocery order; b. Any order despatched containing alcohol will be suitably marked and any courier service used will be aware that identification will need to be shown prior to delivery and cannot be left with a third party c. The licensee shall ensure that company staff, and any outside delivery service employed to facilitate the delivery of alcohol, will be trained on relevant aspects of the Licensing Act 2003 including underage sales, sales to a person who is drunk, obtaining alcohol for a child or a person who is drunk and delivering alcohol to someone under the age of 18; and d. Any website from which customers can order food and drink to be delivered to a home address will contain a message to the effect that alcoholic products can only be purchased by persons who are over the age of 18 years, and that identification will be requested when the alcohol is delivered. Conditions proposed by the Council’s Noise Service 23. Noise or vibration must not emanate from the premises so as to cause a nuisance to nearby properties. 24. In the event of a noise/nuisance complaint substantiated by an authorised officer, the licensee shall take appropriate measures in order to prevent any recurrence. 25. Prominent, clear and legible notices must be displayed at all exits requesting the public to respect the needs of local residents and to leave the premises and the area quietly. 26. The delivery of licensable goods shall be restricted to the hours between 07:00 and 23:00 Monday-Saturday and 10:00 and 23:00 on Sundays or Bank Holidays. 27. The outside frontage shall be monitored and shall swept and cleared of any rubbish and litter associated with the business at the end of trade each evening if required. 28. The licensee shall practice reasonable endeavours to ensure that no internal combustion engine vehicles are used for deliveries from the premises.

Page 33

29. If internal combustion engine vehicles are used for deliveries from the premises, the licensee shall use reasonable endeavours that drivers do not park or loiter in the vicinity of residential premises.

Page 34

LBI MapThat Viewer v4 LLPG Search -=-• 1\ 0 f) 0 (+

Gei

No, ! Vi11.:e,;r ,$" e ~'1;,, Page 35 Page

s This page is intentionally left blank Documents in support of the application for a Premises Licence for:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

1. Witness Submissions on behalf of the Applicant

2. Updated set of amalgamated conditions offered in respect of the premises.

3. Statement of David Walters.

4. Expert Witness Report prepared by Andrew Bamber.

5. Copy extract Agreement for Lease for The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

6. Video showing how to use an Amazon Fresh store.( See link and video sent separately)

7. Still photographs inside and outside Amazon Fresh at Wembley.

8. Video of the interior of Amazon Fresh Store at Wembley. ( see video sent separately)

9. Press coverage of opening of Ealing, Wembley and White City Amazon Fresh stores.

'10. Extracts of comments on social media regarding Amazon Fresh store.

11. Copy Planning Permissions obtained for the premises.

12. Case of Forster v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

Page 37 75140966-.1 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 1

Page 38 75't48425-1 1 BEFORE THE LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON'S

,,AMAZON FRESII"

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, Islington, Nl OPD

SUMMARY OF APPLICANT'S SUBMISSIONS

For Rentote Hearing: 27 April202l

The application and use of premises

l. This is a new premises licence application to permit a ne\ry "Amazon Fresh" grocery

convenience store to open in a vacant premises on Upper Street, Islington. The store will

offer food and beverage goods for home, food to go, coffee and freshly baked items. The

store will, uniquely to Amazon Fresh, ernploy "Just Walk Out" technology. This obviates

the need for busy customers to have to queue up to pay for their items. After scanning their

Amazon account details on their rnobile device into a scanner at the entrance to the store,

a gale opens to permit entry. Any items customers pick up and leave the store with are then

automatically charged to their account. Instead of queuing, customers can use their

increasingly valuable time to pursue interests beyond grocery shopping.

2. A supporting bundle of evidence on behalf ofthe Applicant will be supplied to the Council

prior to the hearing ("Applicant's Bundle"). Documents referred to within these

submissions refer to that bundle or Agenda Papers as indicated.

3. The vacant site was previously used as a furniture store and, rrore recently. was occupied

by squatters. The grant of tliis application will help to prevent such a nuisance in the fì¡ture.

1

Page 39 2 4. Should this application be granted, this store will be one of the first Amazon Fresh to open

in the United Kingdom. It will create a number of new jobs within lslington at a difficult

time for the UK economv.l

5. Three other Amazon Fresh stores all opened earlier this year (2021) in Ealing, Wernbley

and White City. Two of those stores were granted licences within cumulative irnpact areas.

None have adversely irnpacted the licensing objectives. All have been met with a positive

response from customers, most of whom are local residents and people who work in their

localities (the Applicant's Bundle contains online custorller comrnents and news reports

relating to their openings and operation). Amazon have wider and longer experience of

operating this concept of store in the United States since 201 8; with more than 20 similar

stores operating there. (For a number of years Amazon have also held a number of premises

licences for their warehouses in the UK from where deliveries, including alcohol, are

despatched).

6. A detailed statement frorn David Vy'alters, the Regional Manager of Amazon Fresh, is

within the Applicant's Bundle. His statement explains: how the premises will operate,

security measures, supervision of the store generally. the perrnanent (human) supervision

of the alcohol area, age verification and staff training.

7. Mr Walters will also be the Designated Premises Supervisor ("DPS") on the licence and

the application can be amended to indicate that. Mr Walters is vastly experienced in

running reputable grocery stores and superrnarkets. He previously worked for Tesco's for

l0 years and managed Tesco Metro stores through to their larger supermarkets in the

I Ecorrotnic considerations are relevant to licensing clelermirralions. ln l'lope and Glot:t [20] l] EV/CA Civ 31, Touf son LJ stated af $42: " Licensing decisions ofïen involve v'eighing a variets, of-conpeïing considentions: the denand f-or /icensed establisJtnenÍs. Ílte ec'o¡tttntic benefil to llrc prcsprielrtr and Ío the locality by dnwin-g in visirors and stitnulaÍitt-e Ílte dentand. tlte eÍlèct on /au'and ordet'. ilte inpact on the lives of'those tvlto /ive and wot'k in the vicinity. and so oti'.

2 Page 40 3 Greater London Area. Mr Walters, as DPS, will be a clear and responsible point of contact

for the Council and responsible authorities if any licensing related issues were to arise after

the grant of this licence.

8. This application is solely to perrnit alcohol off-sales from a small designated alcohol area

within the proposed Amazon Fresh store (hatched in red on the licensing plan2). This area

is cordoned off from the rest of the store and will be supervised by a mernber of staff at all

times. When it is not operating the alcohol area can be barriered off completely from the

rest ofthe store.

9. Given that: (a) customers will have to scan their details at the entrance barrier to the store,

and cannot physically enter without doing so, (b) there will be no sale of cheap high-

strength beers or ciders (etc), and (c) as previously indicated, the alcohol area is supervised

at all times, the likelihood of people intent on causing anti-social behaviour or problematic

street drinkers being attracted to the store is far lower than with other off-licences within

grocery convenience stores. Any person who does gain entry to the store will be surveilled

by prominent CCTV cameras as wellas by staff supervision.

10. Unusually, if this application is granted, this will mean that an off-licence is given

pennission to open which positively deters problematic street drinkers, drunks or under-

age customers, yet still provides a greater choice and new type of customer experience for

people who live and work in Islington. This benefits the public interest that the licensing

objectives seek to promote. Further, the premises will be prohibited by conditions fì'on-r

selling the high-strength beer. Iagel and cicler that "pre-loaders" tencl to seek out. Nor will

the store sell half-bottles or miniatures of alcohol products. In the rvorcls of Islington's

Statement of Licensing Policy ("LP") in relation to the cumulative impact of off-sales, this

2 Page 23 of Agenda Papers

J)

Page 41 4 is a"prentises tltat can dentonstrate that the risk of alcohol purchases fi'ont the pretnises

being consumed on the street is ntinintal due to the nature and type of alcohol being sold'

($73(b) of LP4).3

1 1. The premises will not be alcohol-led. The applicant now proposes that a new condition is

added to the premises licence to this effect: "lt{o moïe than I0% of the retail area shall

be used for the sale or display of aÌcohol'. It therefore falls within a recognised

possible exception to the Upper Street and Angel cumulative impact policy ($a7@) of

LP3).

12. The licensable hours of 8am-l lprn (all week) are within Islington's Framework Hours for

ofËlicences as set out in LP6. The store intends to open an hour earlier than alcohol sales,

at7am, to sell food and non-alcoholic beverages to early-risers and/or shift workers.

13. Given there are no conditions restricting hours on the planning permission for this site, the

grant of a premises licence with the restrictive hours proposed provides the regulatory

mechanism by which the Council can appropriately curtail the operating hours ofthis store.

This positively promotes the licen more than the refusal of the application

would do - since a refusal of this licence application would have the unintentional effect

of permitting the premises to operate 2417 if the tenant so wished.

14.Thispremiseswassubjecttoanumberof@in2020consideredbythis

Council as the planning authority. The purpose of these applications was to enable the site

to operate as an Amazon Fresh store. The Council granted all the applications and did not

impose any restriction on operating hours. (The various planning perniissions are within

the Applicant's Bundle). Although planning and licensing are separate regirnes. each does

3 $73 of Licensing Polic¡,

4 Page 42 5 not exist in its own vacuuln. The Court of Appeal has ruled Íltaf "tryhile a licensing

contntittee is not bound to follow a planning decision-ntaket''s conclusion. nor vice versa,

each wiJl and should have rcgard to the other ultere both nake decisions i¡t the sante

contcxt." (see Forster v Seuetat:v of State for Cotnntunities and Local GovetLt¡nent12016l

EV/CA 2367 aI $24). This licensing sub-colnmittee is invited to have regard to the recent

grants of planning permission in suppoft of this licensing application.

15. The likely customer who visits the store will be a person who already lives or works in the

area. The store is unlikely to attract new people into the cumulative impact area. It will not

operate very late into the night. Alcohol sales will consist of a small curated range of

products. Many customers will wish to buy their groceries from the store and buy a bottle

of wine or can of beer to take home with them for dinner. It is unlikely to add to the

cumulative irnpact.

The identity of the applicant

16. The formalApplicants are the Landlords of the prenrises (who act as the trustees for M&G

Propefty, a significant property investment fund)a. The Landlord is legally permitted to

make this application as their business "involves the use of the pretnises for licensable

activitiel'and so falls within the category of persons who nray apply f-or a premises licence

set out in s.16(1)(a) of the Licensing Act 2003. This was conflrmed by the High Court in

R (Extt'e¡ne OJrster and another) v Guildford Borough Council.5 Contrary to staternents

within the representations, both the corporate entities who make up the Landlord are UK

4 Due to rules set down by the UK's Financial Concluct Authority, all leases are helcl on trust lbl the propefiy irrvestnrent fund M&G Property by a clepositary. s [20 l3] EWHC 2174 (Adrrin)

5

Page 43 6 registered companies rather than "off-shore" cornpanies (Companies House print or"rts are

within the Applicant's Bundle).

17. Anazon signed the Agreement for Lease with the Landlord on 26 June 2020.6 The front

pages of this agreement is withirr the Applicant's Bundle. In order to give confidence to

the licensing sub-committee that the store will, in fact, be tenanted by Amazon Fresh, and

operated as such, the applicant proposes that the following condition be added to the

premises licence: " This licence has no effect until the licence has been

transferred to Amazon UI{ Services Ltd."

l8.Amazon UK Services Ltd is also a U-K registered company (Companies House printout

within Applicant's Bundle). This cornpany also holds the premises licences for Amazon

Warehouses around the country and so has wide licensing experience.

Responsible authorities and prooosed conditions

19. The applicant has engaged with the responsible authorities in relation to this application.

As a result, conditions have been agreed with both the police licensing officer and

Council's Environmental l-lealth/Noise Officer. These responsible authorities now do not

object to the grant of this application. This sub-committee is entitled to place considerable

weight on the expertise of these authorities who, between them, are the principal

professional guardians of the crime and disorder and public nuisance licensing objectivesT.

Further representations

6 DLre to issues of cornlrrercial sensitivity and confidentiality ahead of the Arrrazon Fresh concept launching in the UK. Anrazorr were not irr a position to disclose tlleir involveureltt in this project at the outset. 7 See s.182 Guidance at 99. l2

6 Page 44 7 20. The remaining objections come from the Ms Terrie Lane on behalf of the Licensing

Authority, a ward Councillor and seven residents (3 of which objections are identical in

terms).

21. A number of the objections raise concerns about the identity of the operator and nature of

the store. Those issues have now been resolved.

22. Other issues identified include those that relate to the operation of the premises, street

drinkers and the potential irnpact on the licensing objectives.

23. ln addition to the operational concerns dealt with in the witness statement of the proposed

DPS, it is submitted that the outstanding issues arç appropriately addressed by;

a. The imposition of the revised suite of conditions;

b. The contents of the expert report of Mr Andrew Bamber

24. These are both considered below

Proposed conditions

25. The robust suite of conditions agreed with the police and environmental health/noise teams

are in the Agenda Papers at Appendix a @37-39). Of particular note are conditions that

ensure (in summary):

a. Full CCTV provision (condition 3):

b. Age-verification and staff training (conditions 3-9);

c Adequate levels of staff ancl security (condition l0);

7

Page 45 8 d. No sales of beers, ales, lagers or ciders of 63% ABV or above, save for

premium products agreed with police(condition l1) ;

e. No sale of spirit miniatures, save as agreed with police or as part of a seasonal

gift pack (condition l2);

f. Endeavours to eliminate or minimise any nuisance; in collaboration with the

authorities (condition l4);

g. Deliveries and internet orders (condition l5-17), deliveries restricted to 07:00-

23:00 (condition 2l), and use of motor vehicles for deliveries (condition 24);

h. No noise to ernanate lrom the prernises so as to cause a nuisance to nearby

properties (conditions I 8-l 9);

i. Cleaning of outside frontage (condition 22).

26.In addition to these agreed conditions, and as outlined above, the applicant also proposes

these additional conditions:

a. No nrore than I 0%o of the retail area shall be used for the sale or display of

alcohol;

b. This prernises licence has no effect until the licence has been transferred to

Amazon UK Services Ltd.

27. lslington's cumnlative impact polic-v (LP3) and off-sales policy (LP4) both recognise that

each application rvill be consiclered on its individual merits. In the case of off-sales, policy

(LP4) indicates that a straight refusal is not the only outcorne but licences may be granted

8 Page 46 9 "subject to certain Jintitation".lt is subrrritted that the limitations set out in the proposed

conditions are the appropriate and proportionate response to this application in order to

promote the licensing objectives.

Expert Report of Andrew Bamber

28. An expeft report from Mr Andrew Bamber is included within the Applicant's Bundle. Mr

Bamber has significant relevant experience and expertise. He was fonnerly a Chief

Superintendent and Borough Commander in the Metropolitan Police (with considerable

experience of licensing matters) and then spent I 0 years as an Assistant Director for Safer

Communities in a London Borough. He is familiar with the issues set out in Islington's

Statement of Licensing Policy, including curnulative irnpact and off-sales.

29.Mr Bamber has made a number of unannounced visits to Amazon Fresh stores that are

already open, subsequently spoke to a duty nlarlager. considered Amazon's operating

policies and training materials, and witnessed the "Just Walk Out" technology in action.

30. In conclusion, Mr Bamber opines as follows

"Having risk assessed the application and the operating envitonntent proposed

by Amazon Fresh I am confident that the store will not negatively impact upon

the 4 licensing objectives, add to the cunuJative impact atea ofAngel and Upper Street or the cuntulative efÍêct of off-sales on tlte licensing objectives".

3l.Thesub-comnritteeisinvitedtoconsiderMrBanrber'sreportinfull. Hisreportprovides

positive leasor.rs for concluding tlre grant of this application will not add to cumulative

inrpact issues in the Upper Street and Angel area.

9

Page 47 10 Conclusion

32. Ultirnately, this licensing sub-committee has a discretion to grant this licence application.

Amazon Fresh offers an innovative concept that is likely to be valued by people who live

and work in Islington. It is unlikely to attract more people into the cumulative impact area,

but will instead provide rnore quality choice for customers who are already in the area and

value shopping for their groceries without the need to queue.

33. This is not an alcohol led premises and, in comparison with other off-licences, there is a

far greater level of control over customers accessing alcohol.

34, Atnazon are responsible and experienced operators. There are robust operating and

training procedures and a suite of conditions proposed. The police and noise teams do not

oppose the grant of this application. If any issues do arise, they will be ironed out very

quickly in partnership with the Council and responsible authorities.

35. The grant of a premises licence will bring the store into the regulatory framework of the

Licensing Act 2003 and control its operating hours. The applicants are aware that the grant

of a premises licence is not a permanent right, but is instead a conditional privilege. If any

issues inrpacting on the licensing objectives were to arise then any person can launch a

licence review that, ultimately, could lead to the revocation of the licence. Amazon ask for

the opportunity to prove their worth and value to the people of Islington.

36. ìt is subrnitted that the licence can be granted in line with recognised exceptions to

Islington's cumulative irnpact policies. But these exceptions are not intended to be

exlraustive of the circumstances in which an application may be granted within a

cumulative inrpact area or for off-sale premises. Each case will be detennined on its own

individual lnerits.

10 Page 48 11 37. District Judge Anderson's menrorable observations in an appealjudgment relating to a

different cumulative impact application are apposite: 8

"lt cannot be the policy of the CumuJative Impact Policyto bring the iron curtain clanging down to alloø, [other venuesJ to continue to trade while shutting out Brewdog tvhich attracts ntore discetning custonters who do not engage in binge drinking, though I do accept the requirement of the Cumulalive lntpact Polícy is to ascertain specifically whether there will be intpact... I accepÍ tltat the Conunittee and the Police did theit'best but their

application of the Policy ø/as too rigid. They seemed to take the view that

man was ntade for the Policy, when the Policy should be nade foï man."

38. The licensing sub-comrnittee is respectfully invited to grant the application and impose the

revised conditions now proposed, all of which are designed to promote the licensing

objectives in an appropriate and proportionate manner.

GARY GRANT Barrister Francis Taylor Building www.ftbchambers.co.uk

20 April2021

sBretvdo-g Bars LÍtl t, Leeds CiLv'C'ounc'i/, Leeds Magistrates' Court. 6 Septernber 2012

L1

Page 49 12 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 2

Page 50

7 51 48425-1 13 1) ln the event that crime or serious disorder is, or appears to have been, committed on the premises, the management will immediately ensure that:

(a) The police and, where appropriate, the London Ambulance Service, are called immediately; (b) As far as is safe and reasonable practicable, all measures will be taken to apprehend any identified suspects pending the arrival of the police; (c) As far as is safe and reasonable practicable, all measures will be taken to preserve any identified crime scene pending the arrival of the police; (d) Any and all appropriate measures are taken to fully protect the safety of all persons present on the premises at all times during operating hours.

2) An incident log [electronic or hard copy] shall be kept at the premises, and made available on request to the police or an authorised officer, which will record:

(a) Any and all allegations of crime or disorder reported at the venue (b) Any and all complaints received by any party (c) Any faults in the CCTV system (d) Any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service (e) Any and all ejections of patrons (f) Any refusal of the sale of alcohol.

2a. The refusals log part of the incident book shall be checked and approved monthly by the designated premises supervisor.

3) CCTV shall be installed, operated, and maintained, to function all times that the premises are open for licensable activities. This CCTV shall comply with the following criteria:

(a) The licensee will ensure that the system is checked every two weeks to ensure that the system is working properly and that the date and time are correct; (b) A record of these checks, showing the date and name of the person checking, will be kept and made available to the police or other authorised officer on request; (c) The Police will be informed if the system will not be operating for longer than one day of business for any reason; (d) One camera will show a close-up of the entrance to the premises, to capture a clear, full length image of anyone entering; (e) The system will provide full coverage of the interior of the premises and any exterior part of the premises accessible to the public; (f) The system will record in real time and recordings will be date and time stamped; (g) At all times during operating hours, there will be at least 1 member of staff on the premises who can operate the system sufficiently to allow Police or authorised Council officers to view footage on request; (h) Recordings will be kept for a minimum of 31 days and downloaded footage will be provided free of charge to the police or other authorised officers on request (subject to the Data Protection Act 1998) within 24 hours of any request.

Page 51 73972629-1 14 4) Challenge 25 shall be operated as the proof of age policy and only a valid passport, photo driving licence, HM forces photographic lD card or proof of age card with the PASS logo or hologram on it may be accepted as proof of age.

5) A notice will be displayed at the till either electronically or physically to remind staff to ask for identification.

6) The licence holder shall ensure that all staff are trained on relevant matters, including the condiiions of the premises licence, age restricted products and [if they are ever left in charge of the shopl the operation of the CCTV system and how to deal with visits from authorised officers. The licence holder shall keep written records of training and instructions given to each member of staff , detailing the areas covered to include the Licensing Objectives , identifying persons under 25, making a challenge, acceptable proof of age & checking it, making & recording a refusal, avoiding conflict & responsible alcohol retailing.

Staff shall sign to confirm that they have received and understood the training. All staff who work at the till will be trained for their role on induction and be given refresher training every 12 months. The written training records kept for each staff member will be produced to police & authorised council officers on request.

7) The licence holder will at all times maintain adequate levels of staff and security. Such staff and security levels will be disclosed, on request, to the Licensing Authority and the Police.

8) There will be no sales/supplies of beers, ales, lagers, or ciders or anything similar of 6.5% ABV or above save for premium products which have been agreed with the police [email authority will suffice].

9) The premises will not sell/supply miniature bottles of spirits of 50ml or less save for premium products which have been agreed with police or as paft of seasonal gift packs [email authority will suffice].

10) Notices will be prominently displayed by the entry/exit

(a) That CCTV is in use & a Challenge 25 proof of age policy is in operation; (b) Advising customers of the provisions of the Licensing Act regarding underage & proxy sales; (c) Of the permitted hours for licensable activities & the opening times of the premises; (d) Not to drink in the street; (e) To respect residents, to leave quietly, and not to loiter outside the premises or in the vicinity and to dispose of litter legally.

Page2 52 73972629-1 15 10)The premises licence holder shall endeavourto eliminate or minimise any nuisance arising out of its licensable activities. ln doing so the premises licence holder will work with enforcement authorities where any issues are identified. A complaints procedure will be maintained in order that local residents have a means of contact if necessary. A telephone number for the duty manager at the premises shall be publically available at the times the premises is open .The telephone number is to be made available to residents and businesses in the vicinity.

12) Regarding any off sales for delivery or, made by way of internet orders, the following will be adhered to:

(a) No alcohol delivery unless ancillary to a food or other grocery order. (b) Any order despatched containing alcohol will be suitably marked and any courier service used will be aware that identification will need to be shown prior to delivery and cannot be left with a third party.

13) The licensee shall ensure that company staff, and any outside delivery service employed to facilitate the delivery of alcohol, will be trained on relevant aspects of the Licensing Act 2003 including underage sales, sales to a person who is drunk, obtaining alcohol for a child or a person who is drunk and delivering alcohol to someone underthe age of 18.

14) Any website from which customers can order food and drink to be delivered to a home address will contain a message to the effect that alcoholic products can only be purchased by persons who are over the age of 18 years, and that identification will be requested when the alcohol is delivered.

15) The premises licence has no effect until the licence has been transferred to Amazon UK Services Limited.

16) The alcohol display area in the store will be no more than 10% o'f the total retail floor space.

Page3 53 73972629-1 16 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 3

Page 54 75't48425-1 17 Statement of David Walters

on behalf of Anolicant Landlord and Amazon

lntroduction

1. I make this statement in support of the premises licence application for the

proposed Amazon Fresh store at The Mall, Upper Street lslington. I am employed

by Amazon as Regional Manager for the South East and within my remit is the

opening and operation of Amazon Fresh grocery convenience stores in this arca.

2. I have been employed in this position since March 2020 and have been involved

in the preparation for, and the successful recent openings of, Amazon Fresh stores

at Ealing, Wembley and White City. I confirm that lwould be involved in the opening

of the proposed store at The Mall, Upper Street lslington.

3. As a personal licence holder, I will be the nominated and initial Designated

Premises Supervisor ("DPS"). Once an experienced and appropriate store

manager is employed it is likely that he or she will then take over as the DPS to

ensure the nominated person has a day to day presence at the store.

4. The purpose of this premises licence application is to permit the off-sale of alcohol

from the store, in a similar way to the convenience stores operated by Tesco's and

Sainsbury's for example. However, the Amazon Fresh stores offer a unique and

75116252 175155048-1 Page 55 18 forward-thinking operating model, as described below, which we believe will be

welcomed by the residents of, and visitors to, lslington.

5. The store is a grocery convenience store and will not be alcohol-led. The front of

house (i.e. retail area) floor space allocated to alcohol selection will be less than

10% of the entire store and contained within a designated area sectioned off from

the rest of the store and supervised by staff at all times. The store will mainly sell

food and non-alcoholic beverages with a limited range of complementary alcohol

items. Our anticipated customer will include, for example, a local resident or worker

who whilst buying their lunch will also buy their ingredients for dinner and this may

include a bottle of wine or beer.

ldentitv of applicant and operators

6. The premises licence application was made in the name of the Landlords of the

premises, British Overseas Bank Nominees Ltd and W G T C Nominees Limited

as trustees for M& G Property. Amazon were not in a position to disclose their

involvement in this project at an earlier date due to issues of commercial sensitivity

and confidentiality prior to the launch of the Amazon Fresh concept in the UK. I am

authorised to make this statement on behalf of the applicant Landlords as well as

Amazon. The applicants are both UK based companies.

7. I can confirm that Amazon will be the tenant and operator of the site should the

licensing sub-committee be prepared to grant this licence application. An

agreement for lease has been signed, subject to this licence being granted.

2

7511â252 175155048-1 Page 56 19 8. The applicant would agree to a licence condition being added to the premises

licence that states'. "This premises licence has no effect untilthe licence has been

transferred to Amazon UK Seryices Lfd." This will give assurance to this sub-

committee, and the persons who made representations in response to the

application, that the site will operate as an Amazon Fresh store.

9. Amazon UK Services Ltd is a UK registered company whose registered office is at

1 Principal Place, Worship Street, London, EC2A2FA.l attach Companies House

printouts for both the applicant companies and the proposed transferee company.

My background and experience

10.1 previously worked for Tesco. lworked for them for 10 years, starting on its

graduate training scheme and then progressed through that training to operations

and then store management. I have managed stores in the Greater London area

from Tesco Metro neighbourhood stores through to the larger supermarkets and

then the largest, Tesco Extra, stores.

11.1 have held the position of DPS at stores I have managed and have had

responsibility for ensuring, amongst other things, the staff working in these stores

were trained in and understood the responsibilities they had in the display and sale

of alcohol. I am aware of my duties under the Licensing Act 2003 in relation to the

responsible retailing of alcohol.

3 Page 57 75116252 175155048-1 20 12.1 have also appraised myself of issues relating to alcohol off-sales in this part of

lslington that may impact on the licensing objectives (prevention of crime and

disorder and public nuisance, public safety and prevention of harm to children) and

referred to in lslington's Statement of Licensing Policy 2018-2022.

13. ln addition we have commissioned an independent expert report from Mr Andrew

Bamber (a former Borough Commander in the Metropolitan Police and Assistant

Director of Safer Communities for a London Borough) to inspect and scrutinise our

operations and opine on the likely impact of our store on the Angel and Upper

Street cumulative impact area and issues relating to off-sales of alcohol in the

locality.

Amazon Fresh Store & "J ust Walk Out" technoloov

14.Amazon Fresh is a new grocery convenience store business that was launched by

Amazon in the UK in 2021. The UK stores have been operating well to date. They

have quickly proven themselves to be a welcome addition to the choices available

to local residents, busy workers and visitors alike. A selection of customer reviews

and local news articles will be included in the supporting evidence bundle

presented to the sub-committee.

1b.To date, no significant issues impacting on the licensing objectives have arisen at

any of the Amazon Fresh stores. We have longer experience of successfully

operating similar stores in the US since 2018, where we now have 22 Amazon Go

and Amazon Go Grocery stores, similar to our UK Amazon Fresh stores.

4 Page 58 7511à252 175155048-1 21 16.The full range of products that will be available to purchase would be those you

would expect in a grocery convenience store including meat, poultry, fish, dairy

products, vegetables, breakfast goods and prepared meals. Our focus is on high-

quality popular products. (We do not selltobacco products).

17. Should this licence be granted, the lslington store would be among the first handful

of locations in the UK to use Amazon's "Just Walk Out" technology. This technology

is designed to give customers a convenient and frictionless shopping experience.

It also means that customers will never have to queue to pay at a checkout or even

use self-service checkouts. This, in turn, means our customers have more time to

do other, more valuable, things in their busy lives than simply shopping.

18. lt is not necessary to pay a fee to shop at an Amazon Fresh store but in order to

shop at the store the customer requires a smart phone, an Amazon account and a

valid payment card associated with that account in order to pay for the goods that

customer selects. To gain access to the store customers scan a QR code

associated with their Amazon account to enter the gates at the store entrance.

There is no access to our store to customers who are not either Amazon account

holders or their guests.

19. Although the store will offer a frictionless shopping experience, this does not mean

the store has a lack of human supervision. The premises will be staffed by a team

of associates to ensure that customers are supported throughout their shopping

Page5 59 75116252 175155048-1 22 journey. Associates will also ensure that the store is appropriately stocked and

presented, and PrePare food.

20.lmportanly, associates will also control entry to the sectioned off alcohol area (on

which see below). There will always be a member of management or a lead

operator on duty to provide support to associates and to assist customers and, if

required, the authorities.

21.When a customer takes something off the shelf, it is added to their virtual cart.

When the customer puts the item back on the shelf it comes out of their virtual cart'

After they leave the store, the payment card associated with the customer's

Amazon account is charged.

22. This means that, uniquely for supermarkets and convenience stores, all of our

customers are existing account holders. Guests of customers are individually

scanned in by the accompanying account holder. Additionally, prominently placed

CCTV cameras discourage shoplifting or anti-social or drunken behaviour.

Because of our operating model, and based on our global experience of running

such stores in other countries, the likelihood of these issues arising is, we believe,

considerably less in our stores than in those operated by other major companies.

The alcohol area

23.The application has been made because Amazon seeks to offer a curated range

of alcohol from the area in the store defined in the application (by way of red

hatching). The alcohol would be restricted to that area which would have the

6 Page 60 75116252 175155048-1 23 capacity to be closed off by a barrier if the store was open for a longer period than

it was licensed to sell alcohol. The alcohol area is positioned away from the store

entrance. The supporting bundle includes photographs of a similar alcohol area in

another UK Amazon Fresh store.

24.4s with all of our other UK stores, the floor space for alcohol sales will be less than

10o/o of total retail floor space.

25.Amazon willapply "Challenge 25" age-verification procedures in relation to alcohol.

It will have in place a trained member of staff (known as an "associate") who would

monitor the entrance to the alcohol display area and will request photographic

identification of any customers seeking to enter the alcohol area who appear to be

under the age of 25 in order to seek proof that they are over the age of 18 and

therefore legally entitled to purchase alcohol.

26. Significantly, there will always be an associate supervising the alcohol area during

the period alcohol is available for sale.

27.The associates are linked by a communication device and so if any of them require

assistance, from management on duty or from colleagues, they can speak with

colleagues to request that assistance without leaving the alcohol display area.

28. Customers who appear to be under the age of 25 but cannot prove they are 18 or

over will be refused entry to the alcohol display area. Such refusals will be recorded

and retained. The associate staffing the alcohol display area will also monitor

customers for signs of intoxication to ensure those who were intoxicated do not

7 Page 61 75116252 175155048-1 24 attempt to purchase alcohol. This is an additional safeguard on top of the need for

all our customers to associate themselves with an Amazon account before gaining

entry to the main store in the first place.

29. The store will also have a separate CCTV system that monitors and complies with

the conditions agreed with the Metropolitan Police. Notices advising of this system

would be displayed at the store.

Staffins and Traininq

30. Staffing levels would be planned in advance based on how busy the store is and

how much support is required in store. At all times there will be a senior staff

member on duty.

31. Staff are trained before they can commence their duties. They will undertake on-

line instruction and will also be given practical training by a member of

management to help them understand their role. This will include their

responsibilities under the terms of any Premises Licence granted.

32.lt would be my role to ensure that these steps are taken in this store as well as to

liaise with management and frequently visiting the store to monitor compliance.

33.I intend to appear at the hearing of this application in order to assist the licensing

sub-committee Members with any question they may have.

I Page 62 7511-6252-+7 5 1 5 50 48 -1 25 Statement of Truth

34. I confirm that I have read the contents of this statement and am happy they are

true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Dated. ..20.04.2021

Signed... Electronically signed for D Walters...

I Page 63 75116252 175't55048-1 26 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Documents referred to in the statement of David Walters

Page 64 75144425-1 27 1310412021 BRITISH OVERSEAS BANK NOMINEES LIMITED - Overview (free company information from Companies House)

Gookies on Companies House services

We use some essential cookies to make our services work

We'd also like to use analytics cookies so we can understand how you use our services and to make improvements.

i\c**pt anaïytìcs ür:*lqål:s

itr:j*cl analytir:* e¿":*kie*

Vi ew coo ki e s ( httpsl/beta=cqmpames h ouse- g ov. u k/h e I p¡coqkies)

Gompanies House

Comp Y if-thCjnformation (http:üfesources.companieshouse.sov.uk/servicelnformation.shtml#comp-þþ)

BRITISH OVERSEAS BANK NOMINEES LIMITED

Company number 00220905

Registered office address 250 Bishopsgate, London, England, EC2M 4AA

Company status Active

Company type Private limited CompanY

lncorporated on 2 April1927 Accounts

Next accounts made up to 3l December 2020 due by 30 September 2021

Last accounts made up to 3l December 2019 Confirmation statement

Next statement date 6 July 2021 due by 20 July 2O21

Last statement dated 6 JulY 2020

Nature of business (SlC)

. 74990 - Non-trading company

Tell us what ygU1hi4k ollhis servig(link opens a new window)-(https:/www.research.ne ) ls there an$þg wrong with this pegú(link opens a new window)_(https:/beta.compinieshousesov.uk/help¡@[þAg(@g¡þhllpS://find-anc!-update.company: information.service.gov.uk/comp3¡V/OOZZOgQ.S)

Page 65 28

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uUcompany/00220905 1tî 1310412021 W G T C NOMINEES LIMITED - Overview (free company information from Companies House)

Gookies on Gompanies House services

We use some essential cookies to make our services work.

We'd also like to use analytics cookies so we can understand how you use our services and to make improvements.

:\l.l,r,:Ult-r rd! lr"ll Vt,L.:) l,{JtJl'i¡(j:)

Rcj*ct i:nnlyTies cü*kiûs

Vi ew co o k i e s ( h ttpslþcla.cqm p anþshsuse, g ov. u k/h e I pJcsskrcs)

Gompanies House

Companies House does no y pf_lhe inþüneüenlilCd (http://resources.compi¡¡lesholse.Sov.uUservicelnformation.shtml#compþþ)

WGTCNOMINEESLIMITED

Company number 01255218

Registered office address 250 Bishopsgate, London, England, EC2M 4AA

Company status Active

Company type Private limited Company lncorporated on 20 April 1976 Accounts

Next accounts made up to 31 December 2020 due by 30 September 2021

Last accounts made up to 3l December 2019 Gonfirmation statement

Next statement date l0 September 2021 due by 24 September 2021

Last statement dated 10 September 2020

Nature of business (SlC)

. 74990 - Non-trading company

Tell us what yggþi¡þlþls servig(link opens_a¡@)_(ntt@) ls there anÉþg wrong with this pegeïlink opens a new window)_(https:/þeta.companieshouse.Sov.uk/helpl@[@(@g¡þ[!ps://finc!-anSl-update.compê!y: information.service.gov.uk/companVJOI ZSSZ q.

Page 66 29 https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01255218 1t1 't910412021 AMAZON UK SERVICES LTD. - Overview (free company information from Companies House)

Cookies on Gompanies House services

We use some essential cookies to make our services work

We'd also like to use analytics cookies so we can understand how you use our services and to make improvements.

,4cnept a nalytles cr:*k;i*s

Rejeet anaiytres eür:ki*s

g I Vi ew co o k i e s (hllps : //b eta . com p-a n i es h ousc. ov. u k/h e pJcgakt e s )

Companies House

Comp y of the informallon f¡led (http-/resources.compgnieshouse.sov.uUservicelnformation.shtml#comp-þþ)

AMAZON UK SERVICES LTD.

I Companynumber03223028

Registered office address 1 Principal Place, Worship Street, London, ÊC2A2FA

Company status Active

Company type Private limited Company

lncorporated on 10 July 1996 Accounts

Next accounts made up to 3l December 2020 due by 30 September 2021

Last accounts made up to 3l December 2019 Gonfirmation statement

Next statement date 1O July 2021 due by 24 July 2021

Last statement dated l0 July 2020 Nature of business (SlC)

. 82990 - Other business support service activities not elsewhere classified Previous company names

Name Period AMAZON.CO.UK LTD. 01 Oct 1998 - 03 Aug 2015 Page 67 BOOKPAGES LIMITED 10 Jul 1996 - 01 Oct 1998 30

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uUcompany/03223028 1t2 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 4

Page 68 75148425-1 31 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Expert Witness Report prepared by Andrew Bamber

I Page 69 75148425-1 32 Executive Summary

I have risk assessed the application for a premises licence by Amazon Fresh who wish to open a localgrocery store in Upper Street lslington. The assessment considers any potential adverse impact on the licensing objectives and cumulative impact should the application be granted.

I conducted unannounced visits to z Amazon Fresh stores that are already operating in cumulative impact areas. On a separate visit I interviewed one of the store managers responsible for one of the stores that I visited and interviewed a store assistant who supervises the alcohol section.

I found the management structure and leadership at the store to be of a very high standard.

The training given to staff, as it relates to the sale of alcohol and Challenge 25, was comprehensive and staff have to pass a training module to be able to supervise the alcoholsection of the store.

The alcohol area is permanently supervised even when it is not open, and it has a gate to close the area offfrom the rest of the store.

The member of staffthat I interviewed, without any prior notification, was very well informed and competently answered a range of questions and scenario's that I posed for her.

The use of technology to create a frictionless shopping experience for customers has an added benefit of being a crime reduction/nuisance reduction tool.

There is a gating system at the entrance to the store that presents a visual and physical barrier to entry. Unlike other convenience stores that sell alcohol. You cannot just walk in and wander around the store.

Page 70 33 The entrance is supervised by a member of staffto assist customers. This member of staff and the impactive image of a hard barrier at the entrance to the store along with the requirement to have the Amazon App on a mobile device, obtain a 'OR' code on the app before entering, and have an active and viable account with the company to electronically open the gates effectively prevents most, if not all, street drinkers from even entering the store. This is unlike other high street convenience stores, petrol stations etc. where people can just walk in unchallenged.

Alongside this there will be no sales of beers, ales, lagers or ciders of 6.5070 ABV or above, save for premium products agreed with police. This with the absence of tobacco products is also another positive move that will l'm sure discourage nuisance drinkers from entering the store. lt will inevitably be easier to go to a store accepting cash and buy both alcohol and tobacco in one purchase.

These processes and policies will undoubtedly deter those people that live in the cash only economy and they will find it easier to avoid the store and go elsewhere.

Having risk assessed the application and the operating environment proposed by

Amazon Fresh I am confident that the store will not negatively impact upon the 4 licensing objectives, add to the cumulative impact area of Angel and Upper Street or the cumulative effect of off sales on the licensing objectives.

Page 71 34 7,. Introduction

2. I have been asked by David Crank of DWF to risk assess the application for'Off

Sales' by Amazon Fresh who are proposing to open a new local grocery outlet in

Upper Street, lslington. I consider, in particular, any potential adverse impact on

the licensing objectives and cumulative impact should this application for a

premises licence be granted.

3. My assessment is completely independent of my instructing solicitor and owner of the venue. I have no personal involvement with any business or resident in the area

and I have had no prior contact with any employee of Amazon.

4. I am able to evaluate the evidence submitted forthe review based upon my considerable experience and qua lifications.

I have attached my personal summary at appendix (r). ln brief I have been

I A licensing observation officer.

A divisional licensing lnspector in a busy and challenging London Borough.

The operations manager for the central London Clubs and Vice unit.

A Detective Chief lnspector managing divisional crime investigations.

A senior investigating Officer.

A Detective Superintendent managing and investigating police complaints

and corruption investigations.

A Borough Commander on 2 London Boroughs responsible for developing

and delivering local policing plans that include the night-time economy

challenges.

As an Assistant Director, for ro years, on a semi-inner London Borough I was

responsible for the Safer Communities portfolio that included the

development and delivery of the Partnership Community Safety Strategy. I

was directly responsible for the Licensing function, licensing reviews and the

respective case management, and policy development relating to the night-

Page 72 35 time economy. This included the enforcement services and enforcement

policies, problem solving local crime and ASB hotspots, and the

development and management of Licensing policies.

5. I acknowledge that as an expert witness my primary duty is to the Court and Licensing Sub-Committee. All facts identified in this report are true to the best of

my knowledge and experience. They were either witnessed or experienced by me

personally or relayed to me in good faith and appear to be credible and reliable.

6. The opinions I have expressed within in this report are honestly held and correct to

the best of my judgement and belief. My fee for preparing this reporL is not

conditional on the opinions I have stated within or the eventual outcome of the

case.

7. Prior to my assessment I was provided withr . Premises Licence application

. Location photograPhs

. A document containing representations

. Various email correspondence

8. ln addition to the documents supplied to me I undertook the following:

. Read the lslington Council Statement of Licensing Policy with particular attention to o Cumulative impact policy areas, Licensing Policy ¡ (LP¡) o Off sales of Alcohol from shops and other premises, Licensing Policy

+ (LP+)

o Licensing Hours, Licensing policy S (LPS and 6)' . Conducted unannounced visits to the Ealing and Wembley branches of

Amazon Fresh to purchase alcohol and assess the entry system and alcohol

areas.

. At a later date met the manager of the Ealing branch to cover the entry

process, staff training, and the sale of alcohol process'

Page 73 36 9. Visits ro. On Tuesday the r4th April I conducted unannounced visits to the Ealing and

Wembley branches of Amazon Fresh. n. Both stores were almost identical in their layout. They are small convenience/grocery stores that appear to have been designed specifically for the

high street environment.

rz. The locations and appearance ofthe stores gave every appearance thatthe

purpose was to cater for local residents. There was an area for freshly brewed

coffee, ready-made meals, a delicatessen area, fresh groceries, fish, meats, canned

and bagged foods, and soft drinks. At the rear of each store was a very small area

set aside for alcohol.

r3. The shops were exceptionally wellappointed and very well illuminated. The

frontage of the stores was entirely of glass. Every aspect of the store was clearly

visible from the street and there was a clear view of the area set aside for the sale of

alcohol. The entire frontage offered excellent surveillance of the inside of the store.

r4. The environment appeared to be a keytheme in each store with no plastic bags

with recycling high on the agenda. I gained the impression that the quality of the

environment inside and immediately outside the store is of paramount importance

r5. There was ample staff at both locations, and I gained the impression that because

no checkout tills had to be staffed all of the store employees were able to monitor

the entrance, the food display areas, and a dedicated member of staff in the alcohol

area

16. Unlike any other convenience store or supermarket there was an electronic barrier

and gating system atthe entrance managed by a member of staff. You could not

just wander into the store due to these control mechanisms. This gating system

Page 74 37 clearly signalled that you have to have an active Amazon account to enter the

store. You could not just wander in as you would in a traditional convenience store

r7. I felt that the array of green and red lights at the barriers depicting entry and exit,

along with the member of staff standing beside the barrier gates was very effective

and gave the appearance of a crime reduction/deterrent initiative. r8. The entrance is supervised by a member of staff to assist customers. This member

of staff and the impactive image of a hard barrier at the entrance to the store along

with the requirement to have the Amazon App on a mobile device, obtain a 'OR'

code on the app before entering, and have an active and viable account with the

company to electronically open the gates effectively prevents most, if not all, street

drinkers from even entering the store. This is unlike other high street convenience

stores, petrol stations etc. where people can just walk in unchallenged.

r9. Aside from the entrance mechanics and account requirements the alcohol controls

inside the store will also significantly reduces the attempts of underage drinking.

zo. Ealing visit

zr. I arrived outside the Ealing store located at 59 The Broadway, Ealing at about

7.4opm. As I walked past the store, I noticed a member of staff clearing street rubbish from the footway and in the entrance to the store a member of staff stood

by an electronic gating system that allowed people to enter the store if they had the required technology and account to enter.

zz. The store is quite small and was exceptionallywell illuminated, and the glass

frontage afforded excellent surveillance into the store itself. There were 5 staff who

were easily identifiable in their distinctive Amazon Fresh uniforms. From the

footway I could see to the rear of the store where there was an area set aside for

alcohol. At the entrance to this area a member of staff stood by a small counter.

Page 75 38 23. I crossed the road and watched the store for some r5 minutes. Every time a

customer approached the store they slowed and took out their phone. They paused

for a short while before stepping forward to an electronic aating system and offering their phone to a monitor. As they did this the gate opened and they

entered the store. As I watched, the member of staff at the entrance to the store

and the member of staff in the alcohol area did not move from their positions.

24. At about 8pm I walked to the entrance to the store and stood by the gating system

I was watched by the door security as I took out my phone. I opened my Amazon

App on the phone and requested an entry'OR'code. I have an active and valid

Amazon account. My account supplied me with the'OR'code, and I stepped

forward offering the screen of my phone to a reader beside the gate with the 'QR'

code displayed. The gates opened and I entered the store. The process was similar

to the entry systems used to enter train platforms and airport gating systems.

25. As I observed, I noticed 4 members of staff in the relatively small store. Two were tending to shelves, one was monitoring the aisles, and one stood permanently at

the entrance to the alcohol area. One member of staff appeared to have left the

shop floor area.

26. I selected some food items then moved to the alcohol area. The entrance was

narrow and essentially blocked by the member of staff supervising the area. He

stood by a small counter where he appeared to be documenting something. As I

approached, he had to step to one side to allow me to enter the closed off area.

27. fhe area was not particularly large, some 5 meters by ,.5 meters with shelving on each side. Bottles and cans of alcohol were on display with the appropriate pricing

clearly displayed. There was also signage that related to the sale of alcohol and

Challenge 25.

28. There was just the z of us in the alcohol area and I said, "This is a strange first

experience, just taking items and walking out". He laughed and said, "And l'm

Page 76 39 watching you". We both laughed and I left with a bottle of beer and then walked to

the barrier system at the front of the store. The barrier system opened automatically, and lleftthe store.

29. Throughout the time that I spent watching the store and shopping, the entrance

gating system and the alcohol area were permanently supervised.

3o. Wembleyvisit

3r. I then drove to Wembley to the store located in Wembley Park Boulevard. I arrived outside the store at about 9pm. The store is located within a new large scale residential and commercial development around Wembley Stadium.

32. The area was quiet, as was the store. The design and layout of the store was almost identicalto that of the Ealing branch.

33. The frontage was almost all glass and afforded an excellent view into the shop. The gated entry system was supervised by a member of staff who was dressed in the

same distinctive Amazon Fresh uniform. I could also clearly see the alcohol area at

the rear ofthe store.

34. I again opened my Amazon app, opening a 'QR' code and offered my code on the

phone to the reader. All of the time I was being watched by the member of security

who stood beside the gates.

35. As with Ealing I walked around the store selecting a number of items before moving toward the alcohol area.

36. I noticed that there were 5 members of staff working in the shop area. From

personal experience I noticed that there were more staff supervising the product

area than in traditional stores where staff tend to sit behind counters or at tills.

Page 77 40 37. As I walked towards the alcohol area it appeared to be closed because a solid grey was gate effectively closing offthe area. Beside the alcoholarea was a member of stafftending to product arrangement on shelving.

38. I stood nextto him and said,'Oh you're closed, and I wanted to buy a drink'. He

stepped forward and said,'No its OK we are open. I was doing something; I closed

the gate to do something'. He then stepped forward and opened the gate so that I

could enter the section to select a drink. While I walked around the small drinks

section the assistant stood bythe entrance watching me until I had selected my

drink. As I walked out he stepped aside and again closed the area as I walked away

to leave the store.

39. Meeting with Ealing branch manager. 4o. I met with the manager on the afternoon of the e5th April to discuss the process of entry into the store and the sale of alcohol given that there is no formal checkout

procedure where in traditional stores the till operator will check the age of any

person purchasing alcohol.

4r. We walked around the store and stood at the entrance. The manager explained that the entrance to the alcohol section is permanently supervised by a member of

stafffrom the opening time of the store at 7am through to rrpm, even though the alcohol section does not open until 8am.

42. The entrance gates to the store are always in the closed position and if any person wishes to enter the store they need to be in possession of a mobile phone or similar

device, have the Amazon app, obtained a'OR'code and have a valid and active

account with Amazon. lf the person does not have an active account, they will not

have access to a 'QR'code and as a consequence will not be able to enter the store.

43. There is no other way to enter the store as a customer

Page 78 41 44. The frictionless shopping experience was explained and when we then moved to

the alcohol section where I asked for the sales procedure to be explained to me.

45. The small alcohol area at the rear of the store was being supervised by an assistant wearing corporate clothing and easily identifiable as a member of staff. The

manager introduced us and asked the assistant to explain her role and how the area

was managed.

46. The assistant explained that at the moment she was the assistant covering the

area. lt was a fixed position and that she monitored everything in the alcohol area. I

asked her a number of questions about the role and how she was supposed to react

in a number of circumstances.

47. She was very clear about her role, and that the area was never to be left unsupervised. She understood challenge z5 and the licensing requirements. She

highlighted the signage and easily answered a series of issues that I posed for her.

48. The manager explained that the alcohol area was permanently staffed from the

minute the store opens at 7am even though the alcohol licence operates from 8am.

49. He then covered the general staffing levels at his store. He explained that there would be more staff in the morning dealing w¡th del¡veries, stacking shelves and

supervising the store as well as supervising the entrance and alcohol areas. ln the

evening there would be slightly less staff supervising the store.

5o. He explained that he had been in a similar role in the same industry managing high street convenience stores. He highlighted that because there were no tills to

manage, he had more staffto supervise the store as a whole.

5r. ln his office he opened up his computer to explain the online stafftraining. The manager explained that the training includes alcohol sales. Each member of staff

Page 79 42 has to complete the training and the manager is notified electronically when the

rz-month refresher training is due and whether it has been completed.

52. Representations.

53. I note that the Metropolitan Police have not raised any concerns about the store

opening in a cumulative impact area. Their view appears to be that the presence of

an Amazon Fresh convenience store will not negatively impact upon the area or on

any of the 4 Licensing Objectives.

54. I have grouped the list of representations into the following grid and address the

concerns in the paragraphs following the grid.

ldentifier Concern Comments Licensing ldentity of The applicant has now disclosed that the company Authority applicant wishing to open a grocery/convenience store in Location, Upper Street is Amazon. A line called 'Amazon Cumulative Fresh'. impact and saturation The concerns about management standards, Shops selling alcohol induced crime, disorder, anti-social alcohol behaviour, cumulative impact, and shops selling off Management sales are covered in some detail in the following Standards paragraphs. Alcohol induced Crime, Disorder and Antisocial Behaviour Councillor Operator not The applicant has now been identified as Amazon identified in the who wish to open a new line of grocery/convenience application stores in a Hiqh Street environment.

Residents x 3 Public nuisance The 3 representations appearto be identical as if Crime and copied and signed separately. disorder Protection of children Resident Noise See fol lowin g paragraphs Street drinkinq Blocking of pavement Closinq time

Page 80 43 Resident Restaurant/bar The application is not for a bar or restaurant. Noise Anti-social The aspects of noise and anti-social behaviour are behaviour covered in detail in the following paragraphs.

55. ldentity of the applicant

56. Both the representation from the licensing authority and the Councillor express concerns over the identity of the applicant.

57. This issue now appears to have been resolved with Amazon being identified as the company wishing to open a local grocery/convenience store in Upper Street,

lslington, branded as Amazon Fresh and catering principally for local residents and

people who work in the locality.

58. Management Standards

59. Amazon is a global company that has been described as the world's most valuable

brand. My only interface with a very small part of the management was during my

second visit to the Ealing branch of Amazon Fresh on the afternoon of the r5th April

202]-

6o. I was impressed with the style and layout of the venue. The manager was clearly a

very experienced individual who allowed me to question a member of staff about

their responsibilities and the sale of alcohol. The assistant knew how the store

operated and their individual role in respect of the company's alcohol policy and the consequences for not adhering to the policy.

6r. The company are currently operating 3 stores in London and are working with 3 separate Licensing Authorities.

62. Training

Page 81 44 63. I was given access to the company's alcohol policy training programme which is an

online module. Each employee has to complete the training before being allowed

to supervise the area set aside for the sale of alcohol. The training has to be

refreshed every rz months. The manager is informed electronically when the

training is due for each individual and if it has been completed to the required standard.

64. The alcoholtraining policy explains:

. That staff cannot work in the alcohol area unless they have satisfactorily completed the training.

. The Challenge z5 signage.

. What Challenge z5 is.

. The consequences of failing to followthe alcohol policyforthe company

and the individual.

. The identification requirements for people who appear to be under 25.

. When to refuse alcohol sales, including age disqualification and also demeanour.

. The training explains the types of identification required before a sale can

take place and the types of errors staff can make when checking identification.

. Photographic examples of people's appearance are also given to highlight

how age and appearances can be deceptive.

. That people should be refused entry into the alcohol section if all the

elements of the identification process are not met.

. The training includes people who are intoxicated and those trying to make third party purchases.

. There is an incident log to record all refused sales.

. At the end of the training module there is a quiz asking a range of training

issues that must be passed.

65. Licensing Objectives

Page 82 45 66. Having visited z stores that have been opened in other Licensing Authorities in

semi-inner London Boroughs I can confirm that the corporate policies,

management standards, and training of staff are all completely consistent with

upholding all 4 licensing objectives. The same standards will apply to the store in

lslington if the licence is granted.

67. lt is interesting to note that both the stores that I visited are trading in cumulative

impact areas and that they have passed the stringent licensing authority tests in

the respective Boroughs.

68. The trading structure of the store, the physical barriers, and the policies and

training of staff have, in my view, a very positive impact on preventing and

deterring any negative impact upon the 4 licensing objectives and the cumulative impact in the area.

69. Many small independent grocery/convenience stores that operate as 'off licences'

tend to have one person present in the store. Spirits are behind the serving counter

while beers and wines are stacked on shelves without a dedicated assistant

supervising the area. There tends to be little to no supervision throughout the store.

7o. Petrol stations that operate as grocery/convenience store with an off licence tend

to operate in a similar way.

7r. Other well-known supermarket chains in the high street environment operate

similarly with some having a visible member of security at the entrance.

72. ln each of these cases people are free to wander into the store and they are relatively unchecked or challenged.

Page 83 46 73. However, Amazon Fresh and the use of technology to create a frictionless shopping experience has, in myview, also created a potentialand significant crime/nuisance reduction tool.

74. lnstead of the open door'walk in' environment there is a very visual and physical

barrier to entry and the gating system is supervised by a member of staffto help

customers. This creates and indicates that there are conditions to entering the

venue. You cannot just wander into the store.

75. To enter the venue customers must physically have a mobile device with the Amazon App. ln addition, the individual must have an Amazon account with an

active and viable debit/credit card that then enables the activation of a 'OR' code

This frictionless process for those people with Amazon accounts also acts as a

barrier to entry for those people who may be street drinkers and who live life

without access to mobile devices and banking facilities.

76.ln my opinion the use of tobacco and alcoholtend to be linked during episodes of street drinking and general nuisance drinking events, so it is also interesting to note

that the store does not sell tobacco products.

77. ln addition to the high management standards, technology innovation, and training

as part of the company's building blocks for a competitive advantage, the operating

schedule for the store ensures that the alcohol policy of the company does not

damage its reputation and brand.

78. ln addition to the above the operating schedule includes

79. Prevention of crime and disorder . The store proposes to operate to the core hours for off licences specified in

the statement of licensing policy.

. The alcoholsection is gated offfrom the rest of the store.

. The section is permanently staffed, even outside licensing hours.

Page 84 47 . Challenge 25 applies to the sale of alcohol.

. All staff have been trained and understand the company alcohol policy.

r At all times that alcohol is being sold from the premises there will be either a

Personal Licence Holder or a senior trained member of the management

staff on duty and capable of being identified by other staff members.

. Training records are kept and updated everytwelve months and shall, upon

request, be made immediately available to Officers of the Police and the

Council in either written or electronic form.

. CCTV systems will be installed at the premises and will cover the area of the

premises that the public have access to with the ability to capture a clear

facial image of every person who enters the premises. The images will be

retained for a minimum of 3o days and will be made available to the authorities on request subject to compliance with data protection

legislation. Signs will be displayed in the customer areas to advise that

CCTV is in operation.

. The Premises Licence Holder will not sell super strength beer, lager or cider

with an alcohol content above 6.5% abv.

r An incident log will be kept and made available to the authorities on

requesÇ which will record; (a) All crimes reported to the premises; (b) Any

incidents of disorder (c) Any visit by a relevant authority or emergency

servrce

A refusals log will be maintained in the alcohol area.

No persons carrying visibly open alcohol vessels shall be admitted to the

premises at any time that the premises are open for any licensable activity.

Alcohol sales shall be sold or supplied in a sealed container for consumption off the premises

8o. Prevention of public nuisance

. Where the supply of alcohol includes delivery to the customer, the licence

holder shall ensure that specific procedures are in place and that the activity

does not cause nuisance at or near the premises and no deliveries will be

before 09.oo or after 21.oo.

Page 85 48 . The Challenge z5 policy will apply to deliveries.

r Notices shall be prominently displayed at each exit from the premises

asking customers to be considerate to the premises neighbours when

leaving.

. The area outside the premises shall be regularly checked during the use of

the licence and any litter attributable to the premises cleared.

8r. Public safety

82. The store will ensure that there are current Health and Safety risk assessments and

policies along with a Fire Risk Assessment.

83. Protection of children from harm

. The premises will apply Challenge z5 as the age verification policy. Where a

person appears to be under the age of z5 identification in the form of a

passport, photo driving licence or other recognised forms of age verification

will be sought and if not provided, the purchase of alcohol will be refused.

Signage will be displayed in prominent positions around the premises

advising customers of the proof of age policy in force at the premises.

A refusals book (electronic or hardcopy) should be kept at the premises to record details of all refusals to sell alcohol. This book shall contain the date

and time of the incident, a description of the customer, the name of the

staff member who refused the sale and the reason the sale was refused. This

record should be made available to Police and authorised Council Officers on request.

Designated Premises supervisor shall regularly check the refusals book to

ensure it is being consistently used by all staff.

84. Cumulative impact

Page 86 49 85. This applicat¡on sits within z of the councils'cumulative impact policies that are of

concern forthe Licensing Authority. One is the geographical cumulative impact

area of the Angel and Upper Street, the other is the cumulative impact in relation

to shops and other premises selling alcoholfor consumption offthe premises.

86. Whilst the area based cumulative impact policy states that successful operations in

other licensing areas is not part of the assessment criteria it is worth noting that the

z stores that I visited were operating in cumulative impact areas without problems.

87. The application is for off sales. The store is not a bar, club or other type of vertical

drinking establishment that brings with it the inherent problems of alcohol consumption.

88. Having visited z other stores that are very similar to the lslington proposal it is clear

that significant care has been taken in the design of the outlet, the training of staff,

a responsible alcohol policy, and the innovative use of technology that gives it, in

my opinion, an attractive and unique appeal for the prevention of crime/disorder

and public nuisance.

89. The store is designed for the high street and grocery convenience shopping for

local residents and the operating schedule is built to protect local residents from

crime and nuisance.

9o. The uniqueness of the store is in the use of technology to create a frictionless experience forthe local resident. OR code technology is in use on the rail network

and in airports so that it only allows people to enter if they have a pass to travel.

This use of this OR code technology will also, in my opinion, have a very positive

impact upon the 4 licensing objectives and act as a deterrent or preventative measure against crime and public nuisance.

9r. I have previously described the process that customers have to go through to enter the store, the physical and illuminated barriers, the technology, the requirement for

Page 87 50 a debit/credit card, and the staffing. ln addition to the entry controls the small and

gated alcohol area that is permanently staffed with trained assistants to monitor

people and sales will also have a crime and nuisance reduction impact.

92. Alongside this there will be no sales of beers, ales, lagers or ciders of 6.5o70 ABV or above, save for premium products agreed with police. This with the absence of

tobacco products is also another positive move that will l'm sure discourage

nuisance drinkers from entering the store. lt will inevitably be easier to go to a store

accepting cash and buy both alcohol and tobacco in one purchase.

93. Having risk assessed the application and the operating environment proposed by

Amazon Fresh I am confident that the store will not negatively impact upon the 4 licensing objectives, add to the cumulative impact area of Angel and Upper Street

or the cumulative effect of off sales on the licensing objectives.

April zozr

Page 88 51 Aooendix r

Personal summary

I retired from the Metropolitan Police in January 2007 having served 34 years of exemplary service. Throughout my service I have been regularly involved in the

enforcement, management, and development of licensing initiatives and policies. I retired as a Borough Commander.

As a constable I worked as an undercover officer detecting offences in late night licensed premises in central and west London. As an lnspector I was the licensing lnspector for a very busy inner London policing division.

Whilst working as a Chief lnspector I was the operations manager in the central London Clubs and Vice unitfrom 1990-1996.As part of this role lhad responsibility for late night licensing in Westminster and I supported other London boroughs as appropriate. During this period, I managed both covert and overt police operations on behalf of the police and the local authority to ensure compliance with the legislation and to prosecute breaches where necessary. The overt licensing visits were structured in a way that ensured that all premises operating with late night licences received at least 4 visits a year from a joint licensing team of police officers and local authority officers. lt was during this period that I was involved in the development of the initial licensed door supervisors' scheme, commissioned by Westminster City Council, which was implemented and managed by myself within the Clubs and Vice unit. During the same period, I researched, with a local authority counterpart, the potential for the introduction of 'Lap Dancing' clubs in Westminster. The work resulted in the introduction of 'lap dancing' establishments in the borough. The initiative and the supervision of the licence was then monitored covertly and overtly by officers under my direction.

As a Borough Commander on 2 London boroughs, between 2001 and the beginning of 2007 (January), I worked with both local authorities to develop the respective licensing and enforcement policies. The work with the Local Authority formed a significant part of Community Safety and local policing plans. With the introduction of

Page 89 52 the new Licensing Act 2003 I oversaw the transfer of responsibilities to the local authority and was instrumental in setting up a joint licensing team for a busy inner London borough. ln 2007 having retired from the police I was employed by an inner London Local Authority as an Assistant DirectorforSaferCommunities. I held this post for 10 years.

As the Assistant Director I had responsibility for crime reduction strategies and the enforcement functions for the authority. These included the Licensing, Trading Standards, and the Environmental Health Teams (including noise). My work involved comprehensive partnership working with all agencies involved in the crime reduction partnership, problem solving local hotspots and environmental audits with the associated action plans.

During the 10 years that I spent with the authority I worked closely with the local policing teams to ensure that licensed premises were effectively supervised and managed in line with local initiatives and the borough licensing and enforcement policies.

As the principal officer for licensing in the local authority I worked closely with local community groups, ward councillors, and members of the licensing committee to develop knowledge and understanding of local enforcement policies and crime and disorder initiatives linked to drugs and alcohol. The work included the supervision of licensed premises, the management of the licensing objectives and working with legal services to take appropriate and proportionate action where necessary.

I was responsible for delivering a structured approach to licensing management, supervision, and enforcement, the council's community safety plan, the enforcement policy, and licensing policy. My role also included the consultation, development, and delivery of the boroughs' controlled drinking zone, cumulative impact zone, Sexual Entertainment Venues, late night levy, early morning restriction orders, Best Bar None, and alcohol treatment programmes. I was the Authorising Officer for all covert surveillance, under the Regulation of lnvestigatory Powers Act.

On my retirement from Local Government I set up my own compliance consultancy and offer independent advice, compliance audits, and risk assessments for licensed Page 90 53 premises. I have given evidence at licensing hearings/reviews, and appeals on behalf of the Metropolitan Police, Local Authorities and individual premises in each of my respective roles.

I have a master's degree in business administration, I am a member of the lnstitute of Licensing, and I have personal alcohol licence. I have also been trained in Strategic Emergency and Crisis Management (Cabinet Office EPC), Emergency Control Management (Cabinet Office EPC), Gold Support London Emergency Planning (LLAG), and I was a qualified Authorising Officer for Covert surveillance in both the police and Local Authority.

Page 91 54 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 5

Page 92 75148425-1 55 DocuSign Envelope lD. 67D54CA4-2E3F-492C-8DC5-66CD31 6'14D21 C/M/S/ Law.Tax l3:54 Fonnula B (as arnended) T. Sirnpson/S. Woohner

DATE 26 June 2020

AGREEMENT FOR LEASE RELATING TO PREMISES KNOWN AS THE MALL,359 UPPER STREET ISLINGTON LONDON (PROPERTY NUMBER 127 t5)

Between

BRITISH OVERSEAS BANK NOMINEES LIMITED AND WGTC NOMINEES LIMITED

and

AMAZON UK SERVICES LTD.

CMS Canreron McKelrrra Nal¡al'r'o Olswang LLP 2 College Square Anchor Road Blistol BSI 5UE 'l- +44 20'7367 3000 l: +44 20 7367 2000 cn'ls. larv

tJK - (r.1{)llìl 190 I Page 93 56 DocuSign Envelope lD. 67 D54C A4-2E3F-492C-8DC5-66CD31 6'l 4D21

THIS AGREEMENT is rrrade on 26 June 2020 BETWEEN

(l) British Overseas Bank Nominees Limited (Conrpanies Registration Nunrber 00220905) and WGTC Nominees Limited (Cornpanies Registration Number 01255218) both of 250 Bishopsgate, Lonclor.l EC2M 4AA in their capacity as norrrinees for and on behalf of NatWest Trustee and Depositary Services Limited as depositaly and not otherwise of the M&G Property Portfblio (together the "Landlord"); and

(2) Alnazon UK Services Ltd. (incorporated and registered in England and Wales under company registration number 03223028), the registered office of which is at I Principal Place, Worship Street. London, EC2A2FA (the "Tenant").

DEFINITIONS

In this Agreernent:

"Acceptable Planning Permission": has the meaning set out in Schedule l;

"Affiliate": a body corporate in which the Tenant or any Gualantor hold shares or other interests conferlirrg the right to exel'cise 50olo or more of the votes which could be cast on a poll at a general rneeting of such body corporate;

"Approved Planning Permission": mearìs the Acceptable Planning Permissioll souglrt to be obtained by nreans of the Planning Application;

"Building": rreans the building known as Tlre Mall, 359 Upper Street, Islington situate within the Prenrises;

"Tenant's'Works": nleans the works to be carried out by the Tenant as described in the Tenant's Works Plans;

"Tenant's \ilorks Plans": means the plans and specifications of the Tenant's Works to be apploved by the Larrdlord in accordance with clause 4;

"ClL": means the potential tax or charge curently known as "comnlunity infi'astlucture levy" enacted under section 205 of the Planning Act 2008;

"Comlrrercial Rent Arrears Recovery": means the procedure by which a lalldlord calr recover rent arrears due under a commercial lease 1r'om a tenant plìl'suant to the Tribunals, Courts and Enfolcement Act 2007 (as amended, varied, supplemented or re-enacted fi'om tinre to time);

"Conditions Precedent": has the meaning set out in clause 3.1;

"Conditions Precedent Long Stop Date": means the latel of the following:

(a) 3 I Decenrber 2020; and

(b) such later date as provided for in clause l2;

"Existing Lease": nreans the lease of The Mall. 359 Upper Street, lslington. London dated l6 October'2009 and macle between (l) Market Row Limited and (2) Jack Wills Limited;

"Existing Tenant": nleans Sofa.con.r Ltd (conrparry regìstration number 05222498);

Expert": nreans the inclependerrt charlered surveyor appointed in accordance with clause I L l-of this Agreenrerrt:

tJK - 6{0llìll90 1 Page 94 57 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 6

Link to video also sent seParatelY; https://www.amazon.co.uUb/ref=cq 0433953 1a1 w?node=21962024031&pf rd m=A3P5ROKLSA1 OLE&pf rd s=alm-storefront-desktop-reserved- 2&pf_rd r=WRPSESYCOZRV2AJYG2VD&pf rd t=0&pf rd p=e8d9b156-2b03-414a-8366- 18d20dd29d44&pf rd i=FMCDummyValue

Page 95 75148425-1 58 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 7

Page 96 75148425-'l 59 60

l+ '\'

.f,a*.: -j Page 97

I

tq- 61 ,ùt ä, in :¿''gi'.i t' n

I \ ¡ I 'I

rsl e ilE re a :tr :t ; I *--iû. l¡lÐ i¡n :¡n l¡n l lfl I I

I ,.- i t g I t ß,å f r. E,;E \ I iffigF.*rii** i ì ffitr ffi I

ffi Page 98 I , ¡Ð. i¿¡r.i¡n.iffr. õGll[fu¡,Ë1,Ëf]' ì :,¡Ir.lÉr¡r:J¡t :¡¡t, t¡..;:-":ftt r ? ,- L. - s-v ' Gq.6 "Ëfitüt ,¡¡,1,! rrßl?3 4.q tl: t ,ì í\ f y, l ìi,.i ¡ I s-{ 'rtâ$rt ¡l¡l !tr Þ ¡ ¿ i- .- .- i jll'l'i* r'Ë-' -r t; :': ¡i;if lF t' tlfllitrl rli;;;;i s¿,ulds 8 3Nl/lfr'u338 BEER,WINE - - -**-a--* & SPIRITS Page 99 Page

f '.1"

'11* 11"ç.

62 63

\ìì

i I ! ?

IJ J t

Page 100 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure I

Video sent separately

Page 101 75148425-1 64 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 9

Page 102

7 51 48425-1 65 Love Book an Local llstlngg Local info f , l-ocal Jobs Homes Motor¡ng ad llRegtsterlsisnin SUPPORT HARRO*TIMES

â News Sporl Conlåct us \¡Vhat's On Announcenrent:; \ Jalford FC Stay lnformed and Slay Safe \-(

NEWS

18th March What the shopping experience is like at Amazon Fresh in Wembley

8y Josep-tr Bcaie!! | t-@¡cedj. o Reporter

MOST READ COMMENTED

We visited Amazon Fresh in Wembley

+-a t in V El 4commenis

Shopping has never been more convenient, as the new Amazon Fresh store in Wembley feels like stepping into the tuture.

î fY ß)F^# urc vcltur ru òcg wr¡dr utrù Lclll laigdtr rur ù¡ruppcrù llt lllë dlcd. Page 103 66 Of course, the sceptic in me was curious on how streamline the process actually is Harrow fish and 1 in real life - but from my first visit Amazon Fresh managed to exceed Á.'l:tiÞ chips shqp named expectations. amons tlre hest in

rtvc tdtttru dtttrl 2 r.ll vicious attack on off lr dutv-pol¡Ec-sfËær

No, there isn't an 3 escaned anaconda roaming Harrow, m says-RSPeA

Motorists facing 4 restrictions due to As with most places since Covid-19 struck the globe, I was met with a queue roadworks outside the new store, but fortunately it was only a matter of minutes until I was inside. Five men arrested 5 after fatal stabbinp üs sf L6:Vcar:01ù þo.y

Drivers face 170 fine 6 for parking outside hffi their homes under new driving law

Councillors to assess 7 latest Kodak site develonment and "8,¡ town centre HMO Obiections to I mosque's bid for m legal recognition " Harrow's wot'st 9 b . Gl Íû¡ -oì;u.or¡n:or=¡n do thev compalclq the rest of London?

Three nlavers to be 10 assessed ahead of G trip to Luton The short queue outside lhe store A member of staff explained that you would need to be signed into your Amazon app, tap the basket icon and then click'Fresh Code'to load up a QR code that grants you entry in the store. t F^= Page 104 67 The Just Walk Out technology - similar technology seen in self driving cars - is made up of cameras and sensors around the store that track what items are taken or returned to shelves, and logs the items in a virtual baskt .'q

.{ìend yr:ur sto¡ies anel photns rr*ur

An ins¡de look al the store In my attempt, I picked out some soft drinks and a few snacks - just to see what the experience was like.

And just like that, I was able to walk out with the items, without having to physically go to a till.

Part of me felt rebellious just walking out. After being conditioned for so long to line up for a till, or to make use of a self-checkout, it felt almost criminal that I skipped this stage.

I checked my phone later and saw it correctly tracked the items I brought outside, the total cost and how long I was in the store.

And a few hours later the cost was transacted from my bank.

{ I v (a) î 7^= Page 105 68 I

1i

h I

An ins¡de look at the store It does leave the question on how truly accurate these sensors can be. Despite the advance in technology, it is hard to believe that sensors can truly take an accurate note of all the items I picked up. Will there ever be a case that I walk outside and I'm accused of having purchased a whole chicken when I just popped in for a can of Coke?

Amazon seems adamant that their technology will suffice and will accurately track what you've purchased. If there is a problem, a refund can be requested through the app or customer services can be contacted - and with so many cameras around the store, it'll be hard to scam the system.

As a person who thoroughly enjoys lounging at Boxpark Wembley or the odd-trip to the Wembley Outlet, I can definitely picture myself popping in the store quite often in a post-lockdown world.

ç J ríì tZ El 4 commenrs r

Promoted Stories

'l'he h,'1 osl llrotr:c lerl {lr:1e b ri I ies

INVESTING.COM I SPONSORED t ** í.,.) F, # Page 106 69 't5104t2021 UK's second Amazon Fresh store opens in Wembley Park I Kilburn Times q

NEWS THINGS TO DO SPORT LIFESÏYLE SUPPORT US

Kilburn Times > News

Am azon Fresh opens grocery store in Wembley Park

| ruaÛ,alie Raffray TEYEO< Published: 12:29 PM March 22,2021

I

I

A second Amazon Fresh grocery store has opened in Wembley Park - Credit: Amazon

The UK's second walk-in Amazon grocery store has opened in Wembley Park.

Online giant Amazon opened an Amazon Fresh store in Wembley Park Boulevard on March 16.

Page 107 70 https://www.kilburntimes.co.uUnews/amazon-fresh-opens-in-wembley-park-7840612 1t8 't5t04t2021 UK's second Amazon Fresh store opens in Wembley Park I Kilburn Times q ano go wrlnoul cnecKrng ouÎ.

Customers simply use the Amazon app to enter and can put their phone away and shop for what they need, bagging items as they go.

Customers can then just walk out, no stopp¡ng to stand in a queue to check out

You may also want to watch:

Amaztr¡ ûpens UK store withrã".¡t tilãs

Amazr:n has r:penecl its first grCIt:sry store on the UK high street, with customers a

Watch more local videos here

{

Amazon opens UK store Wembley Park Murals Coronavirus Test Centre without tills Back on Display Opens At Wembley lkea

A new food brand,'by Amazon' has hundreds of products, including meat, poultry and fish, dairy, fruit and veg, bakery, freshly prepared meals and everyday essent¡als.

'by Amazon'also offers customers hot food throughout the day and on-the-go meals for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Page 108 71 https://www.kilburntimes.co.uk/news/amazon-fresh-opens-in-wembley-park-7840612 2t8 1510412021 Amazon Fresh opens new till-free grocery store in London I Evening Standard

:t .' :;1. .: '1.: . O ótt CI3h o7h Derek Chauvin declines right to.. Unions demand Sadiq Khan out... Loncloners to bask in spring sun...

BUSINESS ) LEISURE & RETAIL Ãmazon Fresh opens new till-free grocery store in London

X

t fh¡Ë,* tår ilrm TlFq¡r' ¡ãl.|Fr àt

?r,:.. ) - hi-i,11, FxeninglrStandard e Ë,ìt:4j

An existing Amazon Fresh store is pictured / Amazon

By Joanna Bourke | 11 hours ago "+y

SPONSORED What you need to know about TikTok LIVE

Page 109 72

https://www.standard.co.uk/business/le¡sure-retail/amazon-fresh-grocery-london-white-city-b929731 .html 1t5 1510412021 Amazon Fresh opens new till-free grocery store in London I Evening Standard mazon Fresh is expanding further in London, with its latest'till-free'grocery A store opening in White Cify, it has emerged.

The branch opening on April 15 means tech giant Amazon will now have three convenience stores offering 'just walk out shopping' in the UK.

Customers use the Amazon app to enter and can put their phone away and shop for what they need, bagging items as they go. Once flnished, they can walk away without using a till, and are automaticallybilled as they leave.

The latest shop, close to White City tube station, comprises 2,500 square feet in ADvERrlltllë:¡flont of house'part of the site.

Amazon Fresh opened its frrst store outside of the US in Ealing in March, and ha X since welcomed customers to another branch on Wembley Park Boulevard.

READ MORE

Amazon selects Wembley Park for location of next till-free grocery store in London, and more ffi sites are planned ffi Inside Amazon's first cashless no-tills grocery shop in London

As Amazon opens a grocery shop in London, will high streets welcome more tech tenants?

The company said: "We are excited to see how customers like the Amazon Fresh stores and look forward to opening more in the greater London area in the future."

Matt Birch, director of Amazon Fresh Stores UK said in March: "!Ve hope to open a few more in London in areas like Ealing and believe it will work in residential areas and city centres."

MORE ABOUT wHrrE crrY ' Rn¡Rzoru l

Comments .1, Reuse content

I Cufesf Fxofic Doo Breed-q Page 110 73 https://www.standard.co.uk/business/leisure-retail/amazon-fresh-grocery-london-white-city-b929731 .html 2t5 1510412021 Another till-less Amazon Fresh store opens in West London - Mylondon

,'j /

Another till-less Amazon Fresh store opens in West London

Amazon Fresh have now opened three grocery stores in London

SHARE +rtl 1 CON/MENTS

By Neha Gohil '15 1 1 :05, APR 2021

lnôôt > See news nearyou YourArea

Enter your postcode

Page 111 ì'; i"";' '7 74 https://wrivwmylondon.news/whats-on/shopping/another-till-less-amazon-fresh-20390255 1t10 1510412021 Another tilliess Amazon Fresh store opens in West London - MyLondon

{'i ü / ãr,

A new Amazon Fresh Store opened on Thursday (April 15) in White Cíty.

This is the thírd till-less Just Walk Out'Amazon Fresh grocery store in London.

The store opened on Fountain Park Way, W12 7NP, at 7am today.

Amazon Fresh also opened grocery stores in Wembley Park and Ealing earlier this year

Shoppers will be able to find "everyday ingredients and essentials on their shopping list" including ready- meals, hot food items, household goods, magazines and flowers.

Amazon Fresh also offers a wide range of trab and go' items perfect for lunch as well as food under the 'by Amazon'range.

The White City store opens at7 am and closes at 1 1 pm Monday to Sunday.

RELATED ARTICLES

Page 112 i)tiv;ti..y 75 https:/iwww.mylondon.news/whats-on/shopping/another-till-less-amazon-fresh-20390255 2t10 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 10

Page 113 75148425-1 76 A Poustian 1 review

! *****"monthago Absolutely amazing experience. Went there today with my family and WOW it was so futuristic and amazing. Great customer service and reasonable prices. Definitely recommend it. Felt crazy to walk out the store without going to the till. Masks and gloves at the front for those who forgot them and overalljust a unique and wonderful experience.

Ben S Local Guide.Sreviews

! *****"weekaso A surreal shopping experience not having to stop by a checkout cashier, simply walking out of the shop. Within 15 minutes, my Amazon account had been charged, and correctly for the few items I picked up. They have all the basics in the small footprint of the store, so don't expect to find the same choice or range as online. An Amazon account is required

Shaher Mia 6 reviews

i l[XllXXamonthago Excellent store, great experience shopping here! Also the staffs were super friendly and always welcomed their customers! Just scan, shop and walk out! Definitely going to visit again! I do hope Amazon opens more branches in London mostly larger store with more products! I definitely recommend this place to others to shop here!

Page 114 77 Liam R Local Guide . 39 reviews

i *****"weekago Good selection of both own-brand and household names. Bigger on the inside, they fit a lot into a small space- having no till points and no queues definitely helps with product placement. Excellent selection of lunch products, with a small hot food unit with soups and toasted sandwiches, as well as sandwiches and salads to fit every taste. Large range of refreshments, as well as an automated coffee machine- coffee was as good as you can expect from one. There was also a second coffee machine that used oatly for those who cannot drink milk. Small alcohol section with limited selection, though you should be able to find a drink for every category. Quite a good selection for ready meals, I personally tried the Meatball bake which tasted excellent. The Amazon Fresh pepperoni pizza was also quite good. Overall this Amazon Fresh store is great for a short and quick shop! An immense amount of time is saved by not having to queue up for tills or having to scan everything. Probably the quickest shop I've ever done! I strongly recommend you visit if in the area, I can't wait for more stores to open. Definitely good for a lunchtime meal deal!

lt Local Guide . 402 reviews

3

* ** * 2weeksaso It was great experience, entry and exit is very easy and Covidl9 safe as well. You need your fresh code to enter and then you are free soul in Amazon. You can buy your essentials, as choice is limited, hopefully it will increase by time.

Page 115 78 o Louis Leonard I review

! *****3weeksaso Amazon Fresh - The Broadway, Ealing A new shopping experience, brought into the UK. lt couldn't be much easier, there was lots of staff inside and outside the shop providing help if you required. Staff were friendly and all following COVID-19 safety measures. Surgical masks and hand sanitiser is available upon entry if you do not have your own. The shop size is similar to a Little Waitrose or equivalent, and the range of products are good. On my visit I purchased noodles from world foods, an 'Our Selection' by Amazon pizza, two items from the bakery (they were amazing) and two hot croissants. Altogether, I spent just under Ê20, which I think is reasonable. All you have to do is, upon entry have your fresh code (found on the Amazon app under basket) ready on your phone to scan on the barriers when you enter the shop. I visited on a Saturday morning and did not have to queue. Once inside the shop, camera's automatically track what you put into your bag. There are quite a lot of camera's inside the store, which could be seen as privacy issues for some, but this is how JWO (just walk out) technology works. When you are ready to leave, you just walk through the barrier and you will be sent a receipt via email for the products you took. lf there is any issues, for example, Amazon charged you for an item you didn't take, you do not need to hesitate as you can report this via the Amazon app and receive a refund. Overall, this is an amazing concept that can be developed further and l'm sure we will see other supermarkets use JWO technology in the future to keep up with Amazon Fresh. I will be visiting the Wembley branch soon to see if there is any difference. I also can't wait untilAmazon Fresh opens stores in the Greater London area and the new store in lslington.

Samr Aziz Local Guide .32 reviews

i

**** amonthaso Great shopping experience. I like the concept, it was pretty straightforward and there was a lot of employees to guide and inform you regarding the payment process. I did however feel a bit weird walking out without paying

Page 116 79 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 11

Page 117 7 51 48425-1 80 PLANNING DEGISION NOTIGE @ rsLrNcroN Development Management Service Planning and Development Division Environment & Regeneration Department Mr Matthew Sobic - Savills (UK) Limited PO Box 3333 Belvedere 222 Upper Street 12 Booth Sireet LONDON N1 1YA Manchester Case Officer: Daniel Jeffries I'Iiz 4AW T: 020 7527 2685 United Kingdom E: [email protected] lssue Date: 02 November 2020 Applícation No: P2020/2099/FUL (Please quote in all correspondence) Dear Sir or Madam

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACTS

BOROUGH COUNCIL'S DECISION: Approve with conditions Notice is hereby given of the above stated decision of lslington Borough Council, the Local Planning Authority, in pursuance of its powers under the above mentioned Acts and Rules, Orders and Regulations made thereunder, relating to the application / development referred to below, at the location indicated, subject to the condition(s) listed and in accordance with the plans submitted, save insofar as may be othen¡¿ise required by the condition(s).

Location: The Mall, 359 Upper Street, London, N1 OPD

Application Type Full Planning Application Date of Application: 07 August 2020 Application Received 07 August 2020 Application Valid: 0B August 2020 Application Target: 02 Oclober 2020

DEVELOPMENT: lnternal and externalworks including the replacement of existing rooflights at roof level along north elevation with louvres to facilitate and provide operational plant equipment at existing building and installation of a vinyl behind the fanlight on the east elevation.

PLAN NOS

PL-010 - SITE LOCATION PLAN, PL-01 1 - BLOCK PLAN, M-1 10 Rev 1 - MECHANICAL HVAC ISOMETRIC VISUAL, I\A-120 Rev 1 - MECHANICAL HVAC MEZZANINE PLAN - PLANTROOM, PL-112 Rev 2- PROPOSED MEZZANINE & cRouND FLooR PLAN, pL-1 13 Rev 2- PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN,PL-211 Rev 4 - PROPOSED EXTERNAL ELEVATIONS , PL-213 Rev 3 - PROPOSED INTERNAL ELEVATTONS ,pL-114 Rev 2 - EXISTING & PROPOSED ROOF PLAN, PL-1 15 Rev 3 - EXISTING & PROPOSED ROOFLIGHT SECTIONS, Covering Letter dated 7 August 2020, Heritage Note_07AUG_Final, Mechanical Equipment Schedules (Planning lssue) Rev 4 Dated 06.08.20, Noise lmpact Assessment v1.7 ref KR06614 dated 5th August 2020.

P-DEC-AP1

Page 118 81 CONDITIONS: 1 3 YEAR CONSENT PERIOD: The development hereby permitted shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

REASON: To comply with the provisions of Section 91(1)(a) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (Chapter 5).

2 DRAWING AND DOCUMENT NUMBERS: The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

PL-O10 - SITE LOCATION PLAN, PL-O11 - BLOCK PLAN, M-110 Rev 1 - MECHANICAL HVAC ISOMETRIC VISUAL, M-120 Rev 1 - MECHANICAL HVAC MEZZANINE PLAN - PLANTROOM, PL-112 Rev 2- PROPOSED Ni'EZZANINE & GROUND FLOOR PLAN, PL-113 Rev 2- PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN, PL-211 Rev 4 - PROPOSED EXTERNAL ELEVATIONS , PL-213 Rev 3 - PROPOSED INTERNAL ELEVATIONS, PL-114 Rev 2 - EXISTING & PROPOSED ROOF PLAN, PL-115 Rev 3- EXISTING & PROPOSED ROOFLIGHT SECTIONS, Covering Letter dated 7 August 2020, Herilage Note_O7AUG*Final, Mechanical Equipment Schedules (Planning lssue) Rev 4 Dated 06.08.20, Noise lmpact AssessmenIvl.T ref . KR06614 dated 5th August 2020

REASON: To comply with Section 70(1)(a) of the Town and Country Act 1990 as amended and the Reason for Grant and also for the avoidance of doubt and in the interest of proper planning.

3 CONDITION: The design and installation of new items of fixed plant shall be such that when operating the cumulative noise level LAeq Tr arising from the proposed plant, measured or predicted at 1m from the facade of the nearest noise sensitive premises, shall be a rating level of at least sdB(A) below the background noise level LAF90 Tbg. The measurement and/or prediction of the noise should be carried out in accordance with the methodology contained within BS 4142:2014.

REASON: To protect the amenity of neighbouring properties

Your attention is drawn to any INFORMATIVES that may be listed below 1 INFORMATIVE: To ensure compliance condition 3 please ensure the noise mitigation identified within the approved Noise lmpact Assessment v1.7 ref. KR06614 dated 5th August 2020 are implemented in full.

2 INFORMATIVE: For the installation of the approved plant equipment please ensure the necessary consent are secured. For further information please see TfL's construction logistics guidance which is available using the following link: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/construction- logistics-plan-guidance.pdf

Page 119 82 Certified that this document contains a true record of a decision of the Council

Yours faithfully Ky^ 3- \t'*'

KAREN SULLIVAN SERVICE DIRECTOR. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AND PROPER OFF¡CER

P.DEC.AP1

Page 120 83 SUBSEQUENT REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING THE GRANT OF PERMISSION

'1. The Building Acts and Building Regulations To ensure compliance with the Building Acts and Building Regulations, you should contact the Building Control Service regarding the development and any intended works. T 020 7527 5999 E [email protected]

2. Street Naming and Numbering lf the development results in changes to any postal address or addresses on the site, you should contact the Street Naming and Numbering section. Failure to do so can result in delays to conveyancing, the connection of services or the initiation of postal deliveries. T 020 7527 2032 or 020 7527 2245 E [email protected] W https://wvwv.islinqton.qov.uk/planninq/applications/street-naminq-and-numberinq

3. Environmental Health, Trading Standards and Licensing You may need to comply with various Acts and therefore you should contact Commercial and/or Residential Environmental Health and/or Trading Standards and/or Licensing. The Licensing Team deal with premises that sell alcohol, provide entertainment, late night refreshment, gambling and special treatments such as beauty therapies, tattoos and saunas

Commercial Environmental Health T 020 7527 3816 E [email protected] Trading Standards E trading.sta nda rds@isli ngton. gov. uk Residential Environmental Health T 020 7527 3083 E [email protected] Licensing T 020 7527 3031 E [email protected]

4. lnclusive Design and Access for Disabled People The London Plan, lslington's Local Plan and relevant Supplementary Planning Documents and Part M of the Building Regulations require the creation/maintenance of an lnclusive Environment.

lf you require any further information or advice on the application of the principles of lnclusive Design contact the lnclusive Design officers T 020 7527 2394 E [email protected]

Other applicable standards and design guidance are set out in:

I nclusive Design in lsl ington S PD www.islinqton.qov.uk/inclusivedesiqn

Streetbook S P D www. isl i nqton.qov. uk/streetbook lslington's lnclusive Landscape Design SPD www.islinqton.qov.uk/DownloadableDocuments /EnvironmenVPdf/ldf pack/lnclusive LandscapeDesiqn SPD Januarv 201O.pdf BSB300:2009 - Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled people

I ncl usive Mobi I ity www.dft.qov. u k/publ ications/inclusive-mobil itv Approved Document M - Access to and use of buildings (Volume 1 Dwellings and Volume 2 buildings other than dwelling) https://www.qov.uk/qovernmenVpublications/access-to-and- use-of-buildinqs-a pproved-document-m

Regardless of any Planning or Building Regulations approval your client and or future occupant may have duties under the Equalities Act 2010 (which supersedes the Disability Discrimination Act). Those duties include taking all reasonable steps to ensure a disabled person experiences no less favourable treatment, which will have implications for the design and management of premises see:https://www.equalityhumanriqhts.com/sites/defaulVfiles/what equalitv law means for v our business.pdf

Page 121 84 5. Highways ln order to comply with all provisions of the Traffic Management Act (2004), Highways Act (1980), New Roads and Streetworks Act (1991) and/or other Highways matters, you should contact: T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

There are various standards, guidance and licenses

Hoardings, scaffolding, skips, overhanging structures, temporary crossover licenses and haulage routes and the like are regulated by the Streetworks Team. T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Tables and chairs licensing are regulated by the Street Trading Team T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Parking suspensions require a minimum of 2 weeks notice T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Any joint conditrons survey required between lslington Council Highways and interested parties before commencement of building work T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Please note any damage to the public highway, or, any asset forming part of the public highway (including lighting, drainage and streetfurniture), alterations to road markings or parking layouts (must be agreed by Traffic and Parking) will be paid for by the developer.

Allworks to the public highway, unless othen¡uise legally agreed, must be undertaken by London Borough of lslington Highways Service. Works to the public highway will not commence until hoarding and major works around the development has been removed/completed. Before works commence on the public highway, the planning applicant must provide lslington Council's Highways Service with six months notice. All new statutory services must be complete prior to footway and/or carriageway works commencing.

All lighting works to be conducted by lslington Council Highways Lighting (or the PFI contractor) and not a nominee of the developer. Any proposed changes to lighting layout must meet the approval of lslington Council Highways Lighting. Consideration should be taken to protect the existing lighting equipment within and around the development site. T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Public highway, footway and carriageway crossfalls, will not be permitted to drain water onto private land or private drainage and vice versa.

6. Trees Any trees which are the subject of a Tree Preservation Order or within a conservation area may not be lopped, felled, uprooted or wilfully damaged without permission. Should you wish to undertake any such works contact the Tree Service. E [email protected]

7. Storage and Collection of Refuse ln order to ensure the intended approach/strategy to refuse, recycling, waste removal is acceptable, you should contact Street Environment Services. T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

P-DEC-AP1

Page 122 85 B. Nuisance from Construction Work Noise from demolition and construction works is subject to control under the Control of Pollution Ac|1974. You must carry out any building works that can be heard at the boundary of the site only between 08.00 and 18.00 hours Mondayto Friday and 08.00 to 13.00 on Saturday and not at all on Sundays and Public Holidays. You are advised to consult the Pollution Team, lslington Council, 222 Upper Street London N1 1XR, or seek prior approval under Section 61 of the Act if you anticipate any difficulty in carrying out construction other than within the hours stated above. T 020 7527 3258 E [email protected]

9. Fire Precautions lf you require continued maintenance of fire precautions in existing buildings where no building work is planned contact the London Fire Brigade. Address: Hackney, lslington & City FRS Team, London Fire Brigade, 3rd Floor Fire Station, Old Street, London, EClV gEY.

Page 123 86 .@ rsLrNcToN Community lnfrastructure Levy (ClL) Note Accompanying Planning Permission

Under the terms of the Planning Act 2008 (as amended) and Community lnfrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended), a development which has been granted planning permission becomes a CIL chargeable development if it proposes one or more new dwellings, or more than 100sqm of new build floorspace.

2. lslington Council is the CIL Collecting Authority for developments in lslington and collects both the London Borough of lslington CIL and the Mayor of London's ClL, which goes towards funding Crossrail 1 and 2.

3. The Councilwill use the CIL Additional lnformation form submitted with the planning application, alongside other application documents, to determine whether the application is CIL chargeable and to calculate the CIL charge.

4. lf your application is deemed to be CIL liable, the charges will be calculated in accordance with the Community lnfrastructure Regulations 2010 (as amended) and the applicable CIL rates from the lslinqton CIL Charqinq Schedule and the Mavor of London's CIL Charqinq Schedule.

5. The CIL is charged in pounds per square metre and is calculated by multiplying the applicable CIL rate by the proposed gross internal area (GlA) proposed by the development. The floorspace of existing buildings to be retained or demolished as part of the development will be deducted from the CIL chargeable area if part of the existing building has been in its lawful use for at least six months in the three years prior to permission being granted.

6. After permission is granted, the Council will issue a CIL Liability Notice if CIL liability has been triggered, which will set out the combined lslington CIL and Mayor of London CIL charge payable on commencement of the development. The CIL charge will also be registered as a Local Land Charge against the relevant land.

7. One (or more) of the development parties must assume liability to pay CIL for a CIL chargeable development by submitting an Assumption of Liabilitv Notice. In the absence of this form, liability will default to site owner(s).

L A development may be eligible for relief or exemption from CIL if it includes affordable housing, is owned by a charity and will be used wholly or mainly for charitable purposes, or is a self-build project. Relief or exemption must be claimed prior to commencement by submitting the appropriate claim form. Further information can be found on the GOV.UK website at idance/commun nfrastructu

L lslington Council and the Mayor of London do not have a policy for granting discretionary charitable relief or exceptional circumstances relief and will not accept claims made on this basis.

10. You must inform the Council when the development is going to start by submitting a Commencement Notice

11. Once the Council has been notified that development works have commenced, a CIL Demand Notice will be issued setting out the total amount payable, how to pay, and when payment is due.

12. Failure to submit a valid Assumption of Liability Notice and Commencement Notice prior to commencement of the development may result in surcharges being imposed, and you will not benefit from the 60 day payment window.

13. Late payment interest and surcharges will be imposed if payment is not received by the due date.

14. Continued failure to pay CIL liabilities due will result in the Council initiating enforcement action, including serving a CIL stop notice prohibiting further development on the site, and applying to a magistrates' court for a Liability Order to recover the debt through the selzure of asseis.

Further information on CIL and all CIL forms are available on the lslington website at lslington.qov.uk CIL-information, and the Planning Portal website at www.https.//www.planninqportal.co.uk/cil. Guidance on the Community lnfrastructure Levy can be found on the GOV.UK website at www.qov.uk/quidance/communitv-infrastructure-levv.

For further information on CIL please contact the Developer Contributions Team at [email protected].

P-DEC.APl

Page 124 87 APPLICANT'S RIGHTS FOLLOWING THE GRANT OR REFUSAL OF PERMISSION

1. Appeals to the Secretary of State Should you (an applicanVagent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can appeal to the Secretary of State for the Department of Communities and Local Government - Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Sections 20 and 21 of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. Any such appeal must be made within the relevant timescale for the application types noted below, beginning from the date of the decision notice (unless an extended period has been agreed in writing with the council): . Six months: Full (excluding Householder and Minor Commercial applications), listed building, Section 73'variation/removal', Section 73'minor-materialamendment', extension of time, and prior approval applications. . 12 weeks: Householder planning, Householder prior approval and Minor Commercial applications. ' I weeks: Advedisement consent applications. . No timescale: Certificate of lawful development (existing/proposed) applications.

Where an enforcement notice has been issued the appeal period may be significantly reduced, subject to the following criteria: . The development proposed by your application is the same or substantially the same as development that is currently the subject of an enforcement notice: you must appeal 28 days of the date of the application decision. . An enforcement notice is served after the decision on your application relating to the same or substantially the same land and development as in your application and if you want to appeal against the council's decision you are advised to appeal against the Enforcement Notice and to do so before the Effective Date stated on the Enforcement Notice.

Appeais can be made online at: https://wvwv.gov.uk/planninq-inspectorate. lf you are unable to access the online appeal form, please contact the Planning lnspectorate to obtain a paper copy of the appeal form on 0303 444 5000

The Secretary of State can allow a longer period for giving notice of an appeal but will not normally be prepared to use this power unless there are special circumstances which excuse the delay in giving notice of appeal.

The Secretary of State need not consider an appeal if it seems to the Secretary of State that the local planning authority could not have granted planning permission for the proposed development or could not have granted it without the conditions they imposed, having regard to the statutory requirements, to the provisions of any development order and to any directions given under a development order.

lf you intend to submit an appeal that you would like examined by Inquiry then you must notify the Local Planning Authority ([email protected]) and Planning lnspectorate ([email protected]) at least 10 davs before submitting the appeal. Further details are on GOV.UK.

2. Subsequent Application Fees No planning fee would be payable should a revised application be submitted within 12 months of the decision. This 'fee waiver' is permitted only where the new application meets the following criteria: . the applicant is the same as the applicant of the original application ' site boundary is the same as the site boundary of the original application . the nature of development remains the same.

Page 125 88 3. Purchase Notices lf either the local planning authority or the Secretary of State refuses permission to develop land or grants it subject to conditions, the owner may claim that the owner can neither put the land to a reasonably beneficial use in its existing state nor render the land capable of a reasonably beneficial use by the carrying out of any development which has been or would be permitted. ln these circumstances, the owner may serve a purchase notice on the Council. This notice will require the Council to purchase the owner's interest in the land in accordance with the provision of Chapter 1 of Part 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

4. General lnformation A planning permission does not constitute a listed building consent. Listed building consent is required before any works of development or alteration (internal or external) are undertaken to a building included on the Statutory List of Buildings of Architectural or Historic lnterest.

The grant of a permission does not relieve the applicanVdeveloper of the necessity of complying with any lgcal Açls, Regulations, Building By-laws, private legislation, and general statutory provisions in force in the area or modify or affect any personal or restrictive covenants, easements etc., applying to or affecting either the land to which the permission relates or any other land or the rights or any person(s) or authority(s) entitled to benefit thereof or holding an interest in the propedy.

A development for which permission is granted may require new rights over other people's land such as: rights to receive light and air, rights of way, access, freeholder consent, party wall award. ln such situations it is appropriate to seek professional advice. Please be aware that as such matters relate are private law matters, the council cannot advise you. lf planning permission is given in respect of land adjoining land belonging to the council or another public authority, you are advised to consult that authority in its capacity as landowner about your proposals. Examples of land belonging to the council include: Public Parks, Gardens, Housing Estates, Estate Roads and Public Buildings such as Council Offices, Libraries and Swimming Pools.

5. lf you require further advice please visits our website at www.islinqton.gov.uk or email planni [email protected]

P-DEC.AP1

Page 126 89 Page 127 90 .@ PLANNING DEGISION NOTIGE rsLrNGToN Development Management Service Planning and Development Division Environment & Regeneration Department Savills (UK) Limited Gase Officer: Daniel Jeffries Belvedere T: 020 7527 2685 12 Booth Street E: [email protected] Manchester lssue Date: 10 July 2020 M2 4AW Application No: P2020/1125lFUL United Kingdom (Please quote in all correspondence) Dear Sir or Madam

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACTS

BOROUGH COUNCIL'S DECISION: Approve with conditions Notice is hereby given of the above stated decision of lslington Borough Council, the Local Planning Authority, in pursuance of its powers under the above mentioned Acts and Rules, Orders and Regulations made thereunder, relating to the application / development referred to below, at the location indicated, subject to the condition(s) listed and in accordance with the plans submitted, save insofar as may be otherwise required by the condition(s).

Location The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington, London, N1 OPD

Application Type: Full Planning Application Date of Application 24 April2020 Application Received 24 April2O2O Application Valid Application Target: 02 July 2020

DEVELOPMENT: External alterations to north elevation including new shopfront. lnternal alterations including reconfiguration throughout including extension of existing mezzanine floor and lowering of ground floor slab to provide level access to northern entrance.

PLAN NOS: PL-000 - SITE LOCATION PLAN, PL-001 - BLOCK PLAN, PL-100/Rev.4 - EXISTING MEZZANINE - GROUND FLOOR PLAN, PL-101iRev.3 - EXISTING BASEMENT PLAN, PL-105/Rev.2 - EXISTING DETAIL PLAN, PL-200/Rev.3 - EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, PL-204lRev.3 - EXISTING INTERNAL SECTIONS, PL-1O2lRev.3 - DEMOLITION PLANS GROUND & BASEMENT, PL-103iRev.5 - PROPOSED MEZZANINE & GROUND FLOOR PLAN, PL-104iRev.3 - PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN, PL-'|06/Rev.2 - PROPOSED DETAIL PLAN, PL-201/Rev.4 - PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, PL-107/Rev.1 PROPOSED GOODS RAMP SECTIONS, PL-205/Rev.4 - PROPOSED INTERNAL SECTIONS, PL-161/Rev.3 - EXISTING & PROPOSED GROUND FINISHES & PL-162/Rev.3 - EXISTING & PROPOSED BASEMENT FINISHES.

CONDITIONS: CONDITION 01 DRAWING AND DOCUMENT NUMBERS: The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

P-DEC-AP1

Page 128 91 PL-000 - SITE LOCATION PLAN, PL-001 - BLOCK PLAN, PL-100/Rev.4 - EXISTING MEZZANINE - GROUND FLOOR PLAN, PL-101/Rev.3 - EXISTING BASËMENT PLAN, PL- 105/Rev.2 - EXISTING DETAIL PLAN, PL-200/Rev.3 - EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, PL- 204lRev.3 - EXISTING INTERNAL SECTIONS, PL-102/Rev.3 - DEMOLITION PLANS GROUND & BASEMENT, PL-103/Rev.5 - PROPOSÊD MEZZANINE & GROUND FLOOR PLAN, PL- 104/Rev.3 - PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN, PL-106/Rev.2 - PROPOSED DETAIL PLAN, PL- 201lRev.4 - PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, PL-107/Rev.1 - PROPOSED GOODS RAMP SECTIONS, PL-205/Rev.4 - PROPOSED INTERNAL SECTIONS, PL-161/Rev.3 EXISTING & PROPOSED GROUND FINISHES & PL-162/Rev.3 - EXISTING & PROPOSED BASEMENT FINISHES.

REASON: To comply with Section 70(1)(a) of the Town and Country Act 1990 as amended and the Reason for Grant and also for the avoidance of doubt and in the interest of proper planning.

CONDITION 02 3 YEAR CONSENT PERIOD: The development hereby permitted shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

REASON: To comply with the provisions of Section 91(1)(a) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (Chapter 5).

CONDITION 03 MATERIALS (COMPLIANCE): The development shall be constructed in accordance with the schedule of materials noted on the approved plans. The development shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the details so approved and shall be maintained as such thereafter into perpetuity.

REASON: ln the interest of securing sustainable development and to ensure that the resulting appearance and construction of the development is of a high standard.

Certified that this document contains a true record of a decision of the Council

Yours faithfully

? n^r'^ <:;rr\^,'>,*-- - , \_: \)

KAREN SULLIVAN SERVICE D¡RECTOR. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AND PROPER OFFICER

Page 129 92 SUBSEQUENT REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING THE GRANT OF PERMISSION

1 The Building Acts and Building Regulations To ensure compliance with the Building Acts and Building Regulations, you should contact the Building Control Service regarding the development and any intended works. T 020 7527 5999 E [email protected]

2. Street Naming and Numbering lf the development results in changes to any postal address or addresses on the site, you should contact the Street Naming and Numbering section. Failure to do so can result in delays to conveyancing, the connection of services or the initiation of postal deliveries. T 020 7527 2032 or 020 7527 2245 E [email protected] W https://www.islinqton.qov.uki planninq/applications/street-naminq-and-numberinq

3. Environmental Health, Trading Standards and Licensing You may need to comply with various Acts and therefore you should contact Commercial and/or Residential Environmental Health and/or Trading Standards and/or Licensing. The Licensing Team deal with premises that sell alcohol, provide entertainment, late night refreshment, gambling and special treatments such as beauty therapies, tattoos and saunas.

Commercial Environmental Health T 020 7527 3816 E [email protected] Trading Standards E [email protected] Residential Environmental Health T 020 7527 3083 E [email protected] Licensing T 020 7527 3031 E [email protected]

4. lnclusive Design and Access for Disabled People The London Plan, lslington's Local Plan and relevant Supplementary Planning Documents and Part M of the Building Regulations require the creation/maintenance of an lnclusive Environment.

lf you require any further information or advice on the application of the principles of lnclusive Design contact the lnclusive Design officers T 020 7527 2394 E [email protected]

Other applicable standards and design guidance are set out in: lnclusive Design in lslington SPD www.islington.qov.uk/inclusivedesiqn Streetbook SPD www.islinqton.qov.uk/streetbook lslington's lnclusive Landscape Desig n S PD www. islinqton.qov. uk/DownloadableDocuments /Environment/Pdf/ldf pack/lnclusive_LandscapeDesign_SPD_Januarv_2010.pdf BS8300:2009 - Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled people

I nclusive Mobility www.dft .qov.uk/publications/inclusive-mobilitv Approved Document M - Access to and use of buildings (Volume 1 Dwellings and Volume 2 buildings other than dwelling) https ://www. qov. u k/qovern menUpu blication s/access-to-and- use-of-buildinqs-approved-document-m

Regardless of any Planning or Building Regulations approval your client and or future occupant may have duties underthe Equalities Act 2010 (which supersedes the Disability Discrimination Act). Those duties include taking all reasonable steps to ensure a disabled person experiences no less favourable treatment, which will have implications for the design and management of premises see:https://www.equalitvhumanriqhts.com/sites/default/files/what equality_law means for v our business.pdf

P-DÊC-AP1

Page 130 93 5. Highways ln order to comply with all provisions of the Traffic Management Act (2004), Highways Act (1980), New Roads and Streetworks Act (1991) and/or other Highways matters, you should contact: T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

There are various standards, guidance and licenses:

Hoardings, scaffolding, skips, overhanging structures, temporary crossover licenses and haulage routes and the like are regulated by the Streetworks Team. T 020 7527 20OO E [email protected]

Tables and chairs licensing are regulated by the Street Trading Team. T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Parking suspensions require a minimum of 2 weeks notice T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Any joint conditions survey required between lslington Council Highways and interested parties before commencement of building work T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Please note any damage to the public highway, or, any asset forming part of the public highway (including lighting, drainage and street furniture), allerations to road markings or parking layouts (must be agreed by Traffic and Parking) will be paid for by the developer.

All works to the public highway, unless otherwise legally agreed, must be undertaken by London Borough of lslington Highways Service. Works to the public highway will not commence until hoarding and major works around the development has been removed/completed. Before works commence on the public highway, the planning applicant must provide lslington Council's Highways Service with six months notice. All new statutory services must be complete prior to footway and/or carriageway works commencing.

All lighting works to be conducted by lslington Council Highways Lighting (or the PFI contractor) and not a nominee of the developer. Any proposed changes to lighting layout must meet the approval of lslington Council Highways Lighting. Consideration should be taken to protect the existing lighting equipment within and around the development site. T 020 7527 2000 E streetliqhts(Ðislinqton.qov.uk

Public highway, footway and carriageway crossfalls, will not be permitted to drain water onto private land or private drainage and vice versa.

6. Trees Any trees which are the subject of a Tree Preservation Order or within a conservation area may not be lopped, felled, uprooted or wilfully damaged without permission. Should you wish to undertake any such works contact the Tree Service. E [email protected]

7. Storage and Collection of Refuse ln order to ensure the intended approach/strategy to refuse, recycling, waste removal is acceptable, you should contact Street Environment Services. T 020 7527 2000 E [email protected]

Page 131 94 8. Nuisance from Construction Work Noise from demolition and construction works is subject to control under the Control of Pollution Ac|1974. You must carry out any building works that can be heard at the boundary of the site only between 08.00 and 18.00 hours Monday to Friday and 08.00 to 13.00 on Saturday and not at all on Sundays and Public Holidays. You are advised to consult the Pollution Team, lslington Council, 222 Upper Street London N1 1XR, or seek prior approval under Section 61 of the Act if you anticipate any difficulty in carrying out construction other than within the hours stated above. T 020 7527 3258 E [email protected]

9. Fire Precautions lf you require continued maintenance of fire precautions in existing buildings where no building work is planned contact the London Fire Brigade. Address: Hackney, lslington & City FRS Team, London Fire Brigade, 3rd Floor Shoreditch Fire Station, Old Street, London, EClV gEY.

P-DEC.AP1

Page 132 95 '& rsLrNGToN Community lnfrastructure Levy (ClL) Note Accornpanying Fãanning Permission

Underthe terms of the Planning Act 2008 (as amended) and Community lnfrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended), a development which has been granted planning permission becomes a CIL chargeable development if it proposes one or more new dwellings, or more than 100sqm of new build floorspace.

2. lslington Council is the CIL Collecting Authority for developments in lslington and collects both the London Borough of lslington CIL and the Mayor of London's ClL, which goes towards funding Crossrail I and2.

3. The Councilwill use the CIL Additional lnformation form submitted with the planning application, alongside other application documents, to determine whether the application is CIL chargeable and to calculate the CIL charge.

4. lf your application is deemed to be CIL liable, the charges will be calculated in accordance with the Community lnfrastructure Regulations 2010 (as amended) and the app licable CIL rates from the lslinqton CIL Charqinq Schedule and the Mavor of London's CIL Charqinq Schedule.

5, The CIL is charged in pounds per square metre and is calculated by multiplying the applicable CIL rate by the proposed gross internal area (GlA) proposed by the development. The floorspace of existing buildings to be retained or demolished as part of the development will be deducted from the CIL chargeable area if part of the existing building has been in its lawful use for at least six months in the three years prior to permission being granted.

6. After permission is granted, the Council will issue a CIL Liability Notice if CIL liability has been triggered, which will set out the combined lslington CIL and Mayor of London CIL charge payable on commencement of the development. The CIL charge will also be registered as a Local Land Charge against the relevant land.

7. One (or more) of the development parties must assume liability to pay CIL for a CIL chargeable development by submitting an Assumption of Liability Notice. ln the absence of this form, liability will default to site owner(s).

8. A development may be eligible for relief or exemption from CIL if it includes affordable housing, is owned by a charity and will be used wholly or mainly for charitable purposes, or is a self-build project. Relief or exemption must be claimed prior to commencement by submitting the appropriate claim form. Further information can be found on the GOV.UK

website at https://www. qov. u k/q u idanceicom m un itv-infrastructu re-levv .

I lslington Council and the Mayor of London do not have a policy for granting discretionary charitable relief or exceptional circumstances relief and will not accept claims made on this basis.

10. You must inform the Council when the development is going to start by submitting a Commencement Notice

11. Once the Council has been notified that development works have commenced, a CIL Demand Notice will be issued setting out the total amount payable, how to pay, and when payment is due.

12. Failure to submit a valid Assumption of Liability Notice and Commencement Notice prior to commencement of the development may result in surcharges being imposed, and you will not benefit from the 60 day payment window.

1 3. Late payment interest and surcharges will be imposed if payment is not received by the due date.

14. Continued failureto pay CIL liabilities duewillresult in the Council initiating enforcement action, including serving a CIL stop notice prohibiting further development on the site, and applying to a magistrates' court for a Liability Order to recover the debt through the seizure of assets.

Further information on CIL and all CIL forms are available on the lslington website at lslington.qov.uk CIL-information, and the Planning Portal website at www.https.//www planninqportal.co.uk/cil. Guidance on the Community lnfrastructure Levy can be found on the GOV.UK website at www.qov.uk/quidance/communitv-infrastructure-levy.

For further information on CIL please contact the Develop er Contributions Team at [email protected]

Page 133 96 APPLIGANT'S RIGHTS FOLLOWING THE GRANT OR REFUSAL OF PERMISSION

1. Appeals to the Secretary of State Should you (an applicant/agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can appeal to the Secretary of State for the Department of Communities and Local Government - Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Sections 20 and 21 of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. Any such appeal must be made within the relevant timescale for the application types noted below, beginning from the date of the decision notice (unless an extended period has been agreed in writing with the council): . Six months: Full (excluding Householder and Minor Commercial applications), listed building, Section 73'variation/removal', Section 73'minor-materialamendment', extension of time, and prior approval applications. . 12 weeks: Householder planning, Householder prior approval and Minor Commercial applications. . I weeks: Advertisement consent applications. . No timescale: Certificate of lawful development (existing/proposed) applications.

Where an enforcement notice has been issued the appeal period may be significantly reduced, subject to the following criteria: . The development proposed by your application is the same or substantially the same as development that is currently the subject of an enforcement notice: you must appeal 28 days of the date of the application decision. . An enforcement notice is served after the decision on your application relating to the same or substantially the same land and development as in your application and if you want to appeal against the council's decision you are advised to appeal against the Enforcement Notice and to do so before the Effective Date stated on the Enforcement Notice.

Appeals can be made online at: https://www.gov.uk/planninq-inspectorate. lf you are unable to access the online appeal form, please contact the Planning lnspectorate to obtain a paper copy ofthe appeal form on 0303 444 5OO0

The Secretary of State can allow a longer period for giving notice of an appeal but will not normally be prepared to use this power unless there are special circumstances which excuse the delay in giving notice of appeal.

The Secretary of State need not consider an appeal if it seems to the Secretary of State that the local planning authority could not have granted planning permission for the proposed development or could not have granted it without the conditions they imposed, having regard to the statutory requirements, to the provisions of any development order and to any directions given under a development order.

lf you intend to submit an appeal that you would like examined by Inquiry then you must notify the Local Planning Authority ([email protected]) and Planning lnspectorate (inquiryappeals@plannin ginspectorate. gov.uk) at least 10 days before submittinq the appeal Further details are on GOV.UK

2. Subsequent Application Fees No planning fee would be payable should a revised application be submitted within '12 months of the decision. This 'fee waiver' is permitted only where the new application meets the following criteria:

P-DEC-AP1

Page 134 97 ¡ the applicant is the same as the applicant of the original application site boundary is the same as the site boundary of the original application the nature of development remains the same.

3. Purchase Notices lf either the local planning authority or the Secretary of State refuses permission to develop land or grants it subject to conditions, the owner may claim that the owner can neither put the land to a reasonably beneficial use in its existing state nor render the land capable of a reasonably beneficial use by the carrying out of any development which has been or would be permitted. ln these circumstances, the owner may serve a purchase notice on the Council. This notice will require the Council to purchase the owner's interest in the land in accordance with the provision of Chapter 1 of Part 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

4. General Information A planning permission does not constitute a listed building consent. Listed building consent is required before any works of development or alteration (internal or external) are undertaken to a building included on the Statutory List of Buildings of Architectural or Historic lnterest.

The grant of a permission does not relieve the applicant/developer of the necessity of complying with any localActs, Regulations, Building By-laws, private legislation, and general statutory provisions in force in the area or modify or affect any personal or restrictive covenants, easements etc., applying to or affecting either the land to which the permission relates or any other land or the rights or any person(s) or authority(s) entitled to benefit thereof or holding an interest in the property.

A development for which permission is granted may require new rights over other people's land such as: rights to receive light and air, rights of way, access, freeholder consent, party wall award. ln such situations it is appropriate to seek professional advice. Please be aware that as such matters relate are private law matters, the council cannot advise you. lf planning permission is given in respect of land adjoining land belonging to the council or another public authority, you are advised to consult that authority in its capacity as landowner about your proposals. Examples of land belonging to the council include: Public Parks, Gardens, Housing Estates, Estate Roads and Public Buildings such as Council Offices, Libraries and Swimming Pools.

5. lf you require further advice please visits our website at www.islinqton.qov.uk or email plannin [email protected]. uk

Page 135 98 NORrts ME4ñ|NE TOraL Gh -rr 7 M? /13 r? lEXlSfrNC. EXTENSTôNI EXTERIOR ELEVATION LEGEND

SICNAGE LOCÂTONS. FEFÊP ELÙÁ' ONS

MØNINE SÞACÊ. REFER dI ls*¡rard design architects ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES

AæI EXSTINGRdLERSHUIIER/SfORÉÊRONIIOREMÀN ÀO?9 NilLGÈTMGÊTGæMGRSSRAMÞOVERN&SUBWÌHGALVANSEOKEÉKLAMÞ NANÐRA LgEL!SIRÀOING ar71 EX gNGWNWTOREMAN FROrÉCrtuRN6æNSrRlCf ON lDUpLrqrEOFAæjl AI76 NEWGLÆEOLAFsÊALFæOÀSÀCCESSMRWTHESOP€IRONMONGERYÁNOGUZ:O

*@ NS M%NINEÀccëss cÄr u00ÊR sÞ€crrEÁrcN .^ í':) ar úDoÊR wrrÉ æ æcREÊs uNorñGWrÈ PRoÍEcrùÊ cacÊ r

A) LJANUF^CruAER SUÊÉSPÀÀ À'CÊSS¡¡DESCAPE OÂACCEÞI¡8LEEOUN¡IFI

CI úYO!T/?ROFILEgSBEANOCONÉ6UR;IION ASSHOViNONIÈED€SGNORAI!IG5 OI TYÞE VERIEALMET¡LúDÐERWIALOO¡ED'ACÉ'ALLFFOIEÛÞNTOfÊÉIOPOFIÊE UOOEÊ WIN INTEOFAIED IOP SI EÊ ÂNÞ HA I OÊÀ [ q ùATEÊJÁL ALIMNIUM q FhnsÉ PoLYEslÊRÊOWffiRTCATEOTOSTÀNOÀRDRqtaOLOR aSÀCCEFTELìByrrE[r.N t_, __ ;! H ÁSSEMBTYTONCLUOEALLúArEñìals FrNrStsÊs ÊrxñaS ÅCaÉSSOñr¿S¡rOArr¡CtsMÉirs ' asÞ€orÞEorocoL1ÞLEIETTESYSTEù{raN!ÊÁanrÊEÀNÞFAÊRaÀIþ!ÀNorc,ccrüÞLvrvrts J..., lr PFÊFOÊMÀN'Ê FFO!IRÉMÉIIIS il ü0DÊñrocoMPLYWtrNsStrrl PÀRr r FS¿:11 trÁSSÀW Page 136 Page

EN2!52 l..4 PROPOSED PtAN . I\,IEZZANINE LEVEL, PLANNING

j (,u z U t.l NElvCÀr L^ÐDER ÊCF icCEsS rO Eo ti -À ñl ilz l t.c) aúi *l*- l æ Yì+á | z.c\¡ e;

1007

¡t.L t:xEnr6wh ælis r¡ ÊEL Àhr aND :o ¡Ê r a.rEcrÊ0 Lr rk r6 coNsra rcrlrN r",,t àt ô TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH

PRO POS€O MEZÀÑ¡NE & ô ROUND

ED PLAN - GROLJND FLOOR . PLANNING A4 P PL-103 99 ln the matter of a Licensing Application for a Premises Licence for premises at:

The Mall, 359 Upper Street, lslington.

Enclosure 12

Page 137 75148425-1 100 Case No: Cll2015/3287 Neutral Citation 120161EWCA Civ 609 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIV[ DIVISION) ON APPEAI, F'ROM THE HIGH COURT OF'JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATTYE COURT PLANNING COURT MR JUSTICE LINDBLOM t20r5ì E\ryHC 2367 (ADMrr\)

Ro]¡al Courts of Justice Strand. I¡ndon.'WC2A 2LL

Dare:2910612076

Before:

LORD JUSTICE LAWS LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE LORD JUSTICE CHRISTOPHER CLARKE

Between:

tr'orster Appellant -and- The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Respondents Government and Ors

Annabel Graham Paul (instructed by Harrison Grant Solicitors) for the Appeltant Ned Westaway (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State Richard Ground QC (instructed by Dentons UKMEA LLP) for the Third Respondent

Hearing date: 8 June 2016

Judgment

Page 138 101 LORD JUSTICE LAWS:

INTRODUCTION

I This is an appeal, with permission granted by myself after a hearing on 18 February 2076, against the decision of Lindblom J as he then was given in the Administrative Court on 6 August 2015 (l20l5l EWHC 2367 (Admin)). The judge dismissed the appellant's claim brought under s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 seeking an order to quash a planning permission granted in October 2014 by the Secretary of State's Inspector (on appeal from a refusal by the London Borough of Tower Hamlets). The permission was for the demolition of a single storey building in Stepney and the erection in its place of a three storey building with commercial uses on the ground floor and six flats on the floors above. Permission to appeal to this court was originally refused by Lewison LI on consideration of the papers on 11 Jantary 2016.

2. The premises in respect of which the planning permission was granted used to be Stepney's Nightclub. The appellant is the fi'eehold owner of the George Tavern, which is also her home. The George is adjacent to Stepney's Nightclub. In her submission (composed by herself) to the local planning authority opposing the planning application the appellant described the activities at the George as follows:

"Live music venue - on Friday and Saturday nights we remain open until 3 am and have live music, performances and events and it is these nights that bring in the most revenues (see attachment of income and outgoirrgs...which show that live music nights account for 82o/o of the George's revenue despite only representing 33o/o of the days that we are open). It is essential for the business that we keep our late licence on these nights. The George Tavern is a quiet local during the week and we barely cover our costs on week nights. If our trading hours were reduced and our live music licence lost due to noise complaints from a nearby residential development, the George Tavern would no longer be financially viable, which would result in closure. The local community would lose yet another local pub, live music and performance venue.

Location business - another crucial aspect of the business is renting out the rooms above the George as locations for photography and film shoots. The George is popular for locations and one of the reasons we get bookings is because of the historical features such as the staircase and the original interior. The fact that the George has 360 degrees natural light is also crucial to securing bookings. The original staircase is a beautiful feature of the George, which runs from the first to the third floors. It is used in almost every location shoot. The staircase gets its light solely from the east elevation, which would be blocked if the proposed development goes ahead. This would seriously jeopardise my locations business. With the bar sometimes making a loss, the money that I eam from locations bookings not only pays the mortgage on the building,

Page 139 102 but also supports the bar when it does not bring in enough revenue."

I shall have to refer further to the appellant's representations when I come to deal with counsel's arguments.

3 The Secretary of State's Inspector in October 2014 allowed the developers' appeal not only in relation to the planning permission, but also in relation to Conservation Area Consent (Stepney's Nightclub was in the Conservation Area) and Listed Building Consent (the George and another adjacent building were listed, and the developers' proposal included alterations to their extemal walls).

4 Six issues were raised before Lindblom J, of which the fifth prefigures the first question in this appeal. It was expressed thus:

"whether [the Inspector] failed to take into account as a material consideration the harm a development would do to the viability of the George Tavern".

More specifically, the question is as to possible future complaints from residents of the new flats about noise fi'om the George, notwithstanding the Inspector's conclusion (to which I will refer shortly) that the residents would not be subjected to unreasonable levels of noise. Ms Graham Paul for the appellant submits that there is a risk, unacknowledged by the Inspector, that such complaints might ultimately lead to the revocation of her late night music licence or the grant of an injunction in a private nuisance claim which would curtail the activities that keep the George going.

5 The appellant had another point about reduced sunlight and daylight, given the use of the George as a studio for artists and photographers and as a film location. In the pafties' written submissions this received less emphasis than the issue on noise, and in granting permission to appeal I said that had it stood alone "l rather doubt whether I would have given permission...". In the event it has occupied centre stage; I will return to that.

THE NOISE ISSUE

6 I should note by way of preliminary that a large number of documents have been included in the court papers, as I understand it at the appellant's behest, which were not before the judge below. They include press reports assembled (I assume) to demonstrate the imporlance of the noise issue for businesses like that carried on at the George in London and elsewhere. In fairness I should say that Ms Graham Paul made no application at the hearing to have this material admitted as fresh evidence. Had she done so for my part I would have refused the application. There is no proper basis for its introduction at this stage, and it would not have advanced the adjudication of the issue.

7 The impact of noise from the activities carriecl on at the George upon the residents tn the proposed development yields the first reason why in July 2013 the local planning authority, Tower Hamlets, refused planning permission:

Page 140 103 "The amenity of the new residents within the proposed three storey building and the area generally would be detrimentally affected by reason of general disturbance and significant noise emanating from clients using the outside beer garden area in Aylward Street and from the George Tavern public house building with live music licence including associated plant."

The Inspeclor's Deci.sion

8 On appeal the Inspeclor af paragraph 5 of his decision letter identifìed the "main issue" as being "whether the future residents of the proposed scheme would be subjected to unreasonable levels of noise". He referred to the George at paragraph 8:

"The George Tavern operates as a public house and a live music venue, holding music events late into the night, until as late as 0300 hrs. The use of the public house also involves the use by patrons of the open area on Aylward Street as a beer garden. The site and the surroundings are also subjected to noise from the surrounding roads, most notably Commercial Road. Concerns are expressed by the owner of the public house as well as many others, that the presence of residential units on the appeal site will give rise to restrictions on the functioning of the public house and its ability to host music events. I shall divide the consideration of noise into various categories."

Thereafter the decision letter contains no fuither reference to the George, save for paragraph 17 (to which I will come) which is relevant only to the daylight issue.

9 The Inspector had expert acoustic evidence from the developer (the third respondents). He also made a site visit. There is evidence that the site visit was comprehensive, and the appellant, who attended it, had and took the opportunity to point out areas which gave rise to her concerns. The Inspector considered the evidence relating to noise at paragraphs 9 - 15 of his decision letter. He concluded at paragraph 21 that "with suitable conditions, the living conditions of future residents can be protected ft'om noise generated locally." It is apparent that this conclusion was arrived at on the premise that insulation measures proposed by the experts would be in place; and impliedly, therefore, on the footing that the windows of the flats would be closed. There was some discussion at the hearing about the implications of this, and I will briefly refer to it. I should say at this stage that in my view it is of the first importance that there is no challenge in this coul't to the Inspector's conclusion at paragraph 2l that the noise levels would be reasonable.

10 The Inspector's decision letter contains no distinct reasoning concerning the consequences (if any) for the George of any complaints about noise that might be made by residents of the new flats.

Page 141 104 The Judgment Below

I 1. Giving judgment on the statutory appeal, Lindblom J turned to what was the fifth issue before him (giving rise to the noise issue) at paragraphs 7 6 - 8 I . He introduced it thus:

*76. Ms Graham Paul submits that the Inspector failed to have regard to the potential harm to the operation of the George Tavern as an established business... The testing of the 'sound insulation' measures provided in the new development might show them to be adequate before the flats were occupied. But even if it did, this would be no guarantee that residents of those flats would not in the future complain to the council about noise coming from the George Tavern. Such complaints might lead to an abatement notice being served, or 'the revocation of the [George Tavern's] late night music flicence] on the ground that there was a breach of the licensing objective of prevention of public nuisance', or an injunction being granted to prevent a private nuisance. It would be no defence to a claim in nuisance that the residents of the new flats had come to the nuisance."

12. As for the argument about possible future complaints of noise, the judge said this:

"77. Those submissions are not well founded. The inspector did not fail to grasp the true nature of Ms Forster's objection to the proposed development. In stating the main issue in the appeal to be 'whether the future residents of the proposed scheme would be subjected to unreasonable levels of noise' (paragraph 5 of the decision letter), and in acknowledging Ms Forster's assertion 'that the presence of residential units on the appeal site will give rise to restrictions on the functioning of the public house and its ability to host music events' (paragraph 8), he effectively recognised the matters about which she was mainly concerned. If, as he concluded, residents of the flats in the new development were not going to be subjected to unreasonable levels of noise, it would follow that those residents would not be likely to complain about such noise and that the spectre of future proceedings against Ms Forster could therefore reasonably be discounted.

79... But in any event the inspector's task was to make planning judgments on the land use planning issues before him, and not to anticipate the likelihood or outcome of future proceedings against Ms Forster as owner of the George Tavern. He cannot be criticized for not venturing into the law of nuisance. His remit was to deterlline Swan's appeal on the planning merits, having regard to the public interest. That is what he did. The issues he discemed in the appeal were truly planning issues, the main one being whether planning

Page 142 105 pemission should be withheld because residents of the flats in the proposed development would suffer unreasonable levels of noise. Having considered those issues, he could see no reason for planning permission to be refused."

The Appellant's Arguntenl

13. Ms Graham Paul assaults this reasoning. She submits first that the impact of a prospective planning permission on the viability of a neighbouring business may in principle amount to a material planning consideration; and so in principle it may. Mr Westaway for the Secretary of State expressly accepts as much. Then she submits that the potential threat to the appellant's business posed by the possible revocation of the George's late night music licence, or an injunction in a suit for private nuisance (in either case, as I have said, following complaints of noise from the George's new neighbours) constitutes just such a planning consideration in this case; yet the Inspector failed to consider, and certainly failed to assess, such risks. t4 Ms Graham Paul disavows any suggestion that the Inspector should have entered into the details of the licensing laws or the law of nuisance. But, she submits, he was obliged to acknowledge the existence on those fronts of potential risks to the appellant's business: and she said the judge was v/rong atparagraph 77 to discount the possibility of likely complaints by future neighbours merely because the inspector had found in planning terms that they would not be subjected to unreasonable levels of noise. She submits that the Inspector should at least have weighed the potential risks to her business against the benefits of the appeal's scheme.

15 Granting permission to appeal after the hearing at which both the appellant and the developers were represented, I said (paragraph 12) "the fact that the planning authorities may conclude that levels of noise will be no more than reasonable... does not I think in law or fact exclude the possibility of later claims which may be found to have weight. The extent to which the planning system should have regard to such potential indirect outcomes of a permission is a matter in my view which justifies an appeal to this court".

Conclusions on tlte Noise Issue

16. As I have said, the impact of a prospective planning permission on the viability of a neighbouring business may in principle amount to a material planning consideration. But in my judgment, if such an argument is to be advanced it should be clearly raised before the Inquiry Inspector (if there is an appeal to the Secretary of State) with a sufñcient degree of particularity and supporting evidence to enable the Inspector to reach an objective and reasoned conclusion on the point. If it is advanced in purely general terms, that would most likely do no more than invite the inspector to embark upon a merely speculative exercise; and such a process would be unorthodox and illegitimate. No doubt there are situations where the threat posed by a prospective planning permission to a neighbouring business will stare the Inspector in the face: the prospect of a new retail outlet across the street from an established shop selling the same range of goods is an instance. But in other cases, and this is surely one, the alleged effects of the proposed development will by no means be so clear. Where that is so, an evidence-based case needs to be made.

Page 143 106 17 . In my judgment no such case was presented by the appellant to the Inspector l8 I accept - indeed there is no doubt - that the appellant voiced her concem about what she saw as a threat to her business. In a passage I have already cited from her submission to the local planning authority, it vvill be recalled that this appears:

"If our trading hours were reduced and our live music licence lost due to noise complaints from a nearby residential development, the George Tavern would no longer be financially viable..."

Later in the same document:

"However much sound insulation is provided, the noise is eventually going to be heard from accommodation so close. In the summer the proposed windows and balcony doors will be left open. What use is any sound insulation incorporated by the applicant in its development then?

The proposal for flats with balconies overlooking this space is bound to result in a limitation of use being brought against The George.

However well acoustically insulated flats may be, their windows and doors are sure to be open in the summer and complaints are sure to arise. This can be foreseen now and is itself another reason demonstrating that residential accommodation is unsuitable for this location." l9 That document was, as I have said, submitted to the local planning authority; but it rs common ground that at the appeal stage it will have been placed before the Inspector. In a later submission (undated, but sent as I understand it in June 2012) the appellant said this:

"First of all I would like to draw your attention to the fact that this proposal is in direct contravention of current and local planning policies. The developer has not demonstrated that the proposed development would be acceptable in terms of noise, and this fact alone raises the very real risk of complaints about activities in the George, which would very possibly lead to revocation of our late night music license lsicl."

In an email letter dated 3 March 2014 (T.o which I shall have to refer further in dealing with the daylight issue), addressed directly to the Inspector, she made fuither observations which she said "should be considered in addition to those raised 1o contest the original application". The appellant stated:

"ln slrnlmary, tlrere is a very real risk that I will be forced to close The George Tavern if permission is granted for the development as the clevelopment will have a very serious

Page 144 107 adverse impact on my income stream from both my bar and photographic/film location businesses. It is highly likely that I will lose my live music license [sic] if permission is granted for residential use for the adjacent site, which will have an enormous detrimental impact on my bar business."

20 It is notable that in her submission of June 2012 the appellant aligned her case on noise to an assault on the noise assessments advanced by the developer ("the developer has not demonstrated..."). The submission of March 2014 is cast in general terms. So are the appellant's observations set out in her original representations made to the local planning authority.

2l There are, certainly, references to a risk that the appellant's live music licence might or would be lost. But the case she seeks to make is that such a risk (or the risk of an injunction) might eventuate as a result of complaints about noise notwithstanding a conclusion by the Inspector that the noise levels would be reasonable. ln my judgment such a case would require chapter and verse - at least some material, if it could be found, to raise the possibility that the licensing or nuisance regime might reach a different conclusion, and to enable the Inspector to form some assessment of the degree of risk involved. Nothing of the kind was put before the Inspector. He was in no position to make any judgment as to the gravity of the risk which the appellant feared. The fact (to which Ms Graham Paul adverted) that the Inspector had, at least, information as to the noise levels which would affect the npw development cannot provide an objective basis upon which the Inspector might measure, even roughly, the likely response of a licensing committee or common law judge to future complaints from the residents.

22 Ms Graham Paul also submitted that the Inspector might have held that any risk of the loss of the George's licence would be unacceptable. But the appellant's case was not advanced in such stark terms. If it had been, given the body of support in favour of the development (whose details I need not describe), there must at least be a question whether such a conclusion would pass the Wednesbury test ([1948) 1 I

23 However Ms Graham Paul acknowledged - indeed, asserted - that it might well have been impossible for the appellant to produce distinct evidence as to the likelihood of the loss of her licence or the grant of an injunction. I think that is right as a matter of common sense; but it only goes to show that any attempt at such a predictive exercise is bound to be speculative. The fact (if it be such) that neither the appellant, nor I suppose anyone else, was in any position to support the case on risk with evidence as to the likely outcome of future complaints in contexts other than planning cannot require the Inspector to confront the issue on no evidence. On the contrary it lends support to the judge's conclusion aI paragraph 79: "the inspector's task was to make planning judgments on the land use planning issues before him, and not to anticipate the likelihood or outcome of future proceedings against Ms Forster as owner of the George Tavetn".

Page 145 108 24 I would therefbre reject the appellant's case on the noise issue. There are two ful'ther points by way of postscript. First I would accept Mr Westaway's argument (skeleton, paragraphs 23 - 25) that while a licensing committee is not bound to follow a planning decision-maker's conclusion, nor vice versa, each will and should have regard to the other where both make decisions in the same context. That being so I would reject Ms Graham Paul's submission (skeleton paragraph 36) that licensed operators such as the appellant are "falling into a void" between separate legal regimes. Moreover I think the judge was in error at paragraph 77 in holding that "if. .. residents of the flats in the new development were not going to be subjected to unreasonable levels of noise, it would follow that those residents would not be likely to complain about such noise..." Humanity being what it is, people are liable to complain about anything; the question here is whether there is any objective possibility of quantifying, however roughly, the likely prospects of success of such complaints. There is none.

25 The second and final point concerns the fact (to which I have referred in passing) that the Inspector's conclusion on noise proceeded on the implicit basis that the windows of the flats would be closed. At the hearing my Lord McFarlane LJ raised the possible significance of this feature: residents would be likely to open their windows in fine weather (or would wish to do so), and if they did, increased levels of noise from the George might fuel complaints. However no point about noise and open windows was taken by the appellant before Lindblom J, nor in this court. So far as I can see the only reference in the planning process to open windows is the passage in the appellant's submission to the local planning authority which I have cited at paragraph 18. Moreover it seems to me that such a point, if it had been raised, would have been material to the Inspector's conclusion (paragraph 2l)that the noise levels were reasonable; however, as I have emphasised (paragraph 9), there is no challenge in this court to that conclusion.

26. In fact Ms Graham Paul did not accept that planning permission could properly have been refused on the footing that the noise with the windows open would have been unreasonable, as I understood her because the developers had put forward a proper sound insulation system. That seems to me to be something of a non sequitur. If there was any point to be taken about noise and open windows, it would have gone to the Inspector's paragraph 2l conclusion. It has no independent force as a buttress for the appellant's fears of risk to her licence; and if it did, it would falter on the want of any means of quantifying the risk.

THE LIGHT ISSUE

27. The Inspector addressed the development's implications for natural light in the interior of the George in a single paragraph:

"17. Although the Council appear to be satisfied about the effects on residents within the adjacent public house, objections have been received in relation to these direct effects. I was able to gain access to the residential upper floors within the public house ancl to look out over the appeal site. Furlhermore, the appellants submitted with the appeal an assessment of the effects of the proposal on daylight and sunlight received at the neighbouring property. As a result of my own consideration of

Page 146 109 this matter and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, I accept the conclusions set out therein, that there would be no unreasonable effects in this respect."

28. At paragraph 80 of his judgment Lindblom J said this:

"I also accept the submissions of Mr Westaway and Mr Ground on the inspector's consideration of the likely effects of the proposed development on daylight and sunlight reaching the George Tavern. The inspector dealt with this matter in paragraph 17 of the decision letter. His conclusion matched that of the expert assessment on the effects of the development on daylight and sunlight, submitted by Swan with their application for planning permission in October 2011. The council had not opposed the development on these grounds. But the inspector came to his own judgment upon it, having regard to the material before him, and to what he had seen on his site visit when he visited the upper floors of the George Tuu"* urri looked out over the appeal site. Contrary to Ms Graham Paul's submission, he did not fail to consider what she described as the 'abnormally sensitive uses' on those upper floors. He did not neglect this aspect of Ms Forster's objection, including her fear that the use of her premises 'as a location for film, music videos and for fashion shoots' would be jeopardized. As he said at the end of paragraph 17 of his letter, he was satisfied that the development would have 'no unreasonable effects' on daylight and sunlight. This was classically a judgment for him to make, and with which the court cannot, in my view, properly interfere. I cannot see how any more detailed reasons could be expected here. They would only elaborate on what was, in fact, a straightforward exercise of planning judgment."

29 The appellant had raised specific concerns as to the effects of loss of light in the George (as she saw it) having regard to its use for film and photographic location shoots. She placed particular emphasis on the staircase. I will repeat this passage from her original submission to the local planning authority, under the heading "Location Business":

"The original staircase is a beautiful feature of the George, which runs from the first to the third floors. It is used in almost every location shoot. The staircase gets its light solely from the east elevation, which would be blocked if the proposed development goes ahead. This would seriously jeopardise my locations business."

Later in the same document this appears:

"Tlre window onto the main stair landing between first and second floor is a set piece for almost all users. To deny this direct sunlight and much of its changing qualities of light would be a serious loss."

Page 147 110 There is no reference to loss of light in the appellant's June 2012 submission However in her letter to the Inspector of 3 March 2014 she said this:

"The proposal will also result in a serious loss of light to the upper floors of The George Tavern, which will severely impact on my location business as further described below...

If the proposed application were to be approved... I would lose the sun light that pours through the windows onto the wide staircase and landings, the bedroom, part of the kitchen and my artists studio.

If this natural source of light were to be denied or compromised, I would lose an essential part of my revenue, which is not only important to the restoration of the building, but also subsidizes the running and upkeep of the George Tavem bar. This is an important factor and should be seriously taken into account."

30 These concerïs are not referred to in paragraph 17 of the decision letter. It is, of course, well recognised that such decisions are to be read with a certain degree of latitude. As Lindblom J said in Bloor Homes East Midlands Ltd l20I4l EWHC 754 (Admin) at paragraph 19:

"Decisions of the Secretary of State and his inspectors in appeals against the refusal of planning permission are to be construed in a reasonably flexible way. Decision letters are written principally for parties who know what the issues between them are and what evidence and argument has been deployed on those issues. An inspector does not need to 'rehearse every argument relating to each matter in every paragraph' (see the judgment of Forbes J in Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment (1987) 42 P. & C.R. 26, af p.28);'

But the appellant's point about light (especially on the staircase) and the effect of its diminution on her business was specific and distinct. There was, it is true, nothing about it in the local planning authority's presentation to the Inspector (they of course had refused planning permission), and it is not clear how far the issue received any emphasis at the site visit. Moreover the appellant's original submission to the local planning authority was more pointed, certainly in relation to the staircase, than her later letter to the Inspector. But in my judgment the issue was sufficiently flagged to require the Inspector to deal with it in terms; and he did not.

31 That conclusion might, I acknowledge, be undermined or indeed refuted if the evidence before the Inspector demonstrated that on the facts there was nothing in the point. But that is not the case. Dr Defoe's expert repoft, commissioned by the developers, has this reference to the staircase on the third page:

"The flank elevation of the George Tavern faces almost due east, from which it does benefit from the moming sunlight at

Page 148 111 present and, although this will be almost totally eliminated by the proposed development, it should be noted that the 'rooms' affected are a staircase at first second and third floor levels, and what might conceivably be bedrooms to the rear of the second and third floors."

The report proceeds to discuss the development's effect on light through "two existing windows serving habitable rooms" ancl concludes that they "will experience a negligible reduction in VSC ['vertical sky component' - a measure of 'the amount of skylight falling on a vertical wall or window']". As I understand it - at the hearing we were shown a number of illustrative materials - these are not windows giving onto the staircase.

32. In the circumstances it is by no means clear that the appellant's apprehensions concerning light (especially upon the staircase) have objectively been set at rest. In my judgment the Inspector was bound to deal with them and did not do so. I do not think, with respect,that the judge was entitled to conclude aÍ.paragraph 80 that "[the Inspector] did not neglect this aspect of Ms Forster's objection [the 'abnormally sensitive uses'], including her fear that the use of her premises 'as a location for fìlm, music videos and for fashion shoots' would be jeopardized".

JJ I suspect, though this does not advance the matter, that the significance of the appellant's concerns may have been misplaced by the Inspector given the range of materials he had to consider. If so, it is perhaps an illustration of the need for vigilance on the part of a decision-maker dealing with a case, as happened here, on written representations only.

OVER,,ILL CONCLUSION

34 I would allow the appeal on the light issue only. If my Lords take the same view, the question of relief arises. At the hearing counsel were agreed, I think correctly, that the only form of relief contemplated by the statute (s.288(5) of the 1990 Act) is an order to quash the grant of planning permission. That is the order I would make.

Lord Justice McFarlane

35. I agree

Lord Justice Christopher Clarke

36. I also agree

Page 149 112 This page is intentionally left blank