DOCSLIB.ORG

Queer & Trans People of Color and Digital Platform Engagement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Queer & Trans People of Color and Digital Platform Engagement Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2020 Intersectional digital rhetoric pedagogy: Queer & trans people of color and digital platform engagement Lauren Ashley Malone Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Recommended Citation Malone, Lauren Ashley, "Intersectional digital rhetoric pedagogy: Queer & trans people of color and digital platform engagement" (2020). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 18014. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/18014 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intersectional digital rhetoric pedagogy: Queer & trans people of color and digital platform engagement by Lauren A. Malone A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Rhetoric and Professional Communication Program of Study Committee: Barbara Blakely, Co-major Professor Abby Dubisar, Co-major Professor Jeanine Aune Novotny Lawrence Manali Sheth The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this dissertation. The Graduate College will ensure this dissertation is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2020 Copyright © Lauren A. Malone, 2020. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... vi NOMENCLATURE .................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................ ix ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION: UNDERSTANDING QTPOC REPRESENTATION ONLINE .................................................................................... 1 Background of This Study ..................................................................................... 1 The Issue for Instructors........................................................................................ 7 Dissertation Overview ......................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW: INTERSECTIONS OF CULTURE, PLATFORMS, AND JUSTICE-CENTERED PEDAGOGY ....................................... 11 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 11 Rhetoric – Cultural, Digital, Queer ....................................................................... 12 Platform Communication ..................................................................................... 18 Anti-Oppressive Pedagogy.................................................................................. 25 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY: CENTERING QTPOC VOICES IN DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS ................................................................................................... 32 Researcher Positionality...................................................................................... 32 Interviews ............................................................................................................ 34 Participant Selection ....................................................................................... 35 Data Collection ............................................................................................... 37 Data Analysis ................................................................................................. 39 Digital Rhetorical Analysis ................................................................................... 42 Platforms and Definitions ................................................................................ 42 Digital Rhetorical Analysis .............................................................................. 45 Hypothesis .......................................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER 4. INTERACTION: STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT IN DIGITAL SPACES ............................................................................................... 51 Conversation ....................................................................................................... 54 Amplification (Tool) ............................................................................................. 63 Digital Rhetorical Appeals ................................................................................... 69 Disruption ............................................................................................................ 73 iii CHAPTER 5. BUILDING COMMUNITY AND CURATING QTPOC CONTENT ....... 77 Building Community through Amplification .......................................................... 78 Protecting Community through Moderation ......................................................... 82 Community Persona & Impact of Curation .......................................................... 88 CHAPTER 6. PEDAGOGICAL DISCUSSIONS ....................................................... 94 Where to Start? ................................................................................................... 96 What’s Out There ................................................................................................ 98 Analysis of Platforms as Training ........................................................................ 99 Centering a Queered Landscape for Creation ................................................... 101 Moderation as a Critical Literacy ....................................................................... 104 Remixing the Common Spaces ......................................................................... 105 CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION ................................................................................. 109 Further Study .................................................................................................... 109 Limitations ......................................................................................................... 111 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 112 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 115 APPENDIX A. IRB APPROVAL ............................................................................. 122 APPENDIX B. INFORMED CONSENT .................................................................. 123 APPENDIX C. INITIAL SURVEY ........................................................................... 127 APPENDIX D. INTERVIEW PROTOCOL .............................................................. 129 APPENDIX E. INTERVIEW MATRIX ..................................................................... 131 iv LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Chantal Tuay & Nafessa Williams. Black Lightning, CW............................. 2 Figure 2. Megan McCain uses a reaction GIF.......................................................... 14 Figure 3. Kid Fury sipping tea .................................................................................. 15 Figure 4. Kristen Clarke tweets in remembrance of Sandra Bland, whose death started the #SayHerName movement .............................. 17 Figure 5. Voyant Tool with Interview Example ......................................................... 40 Figure 6. Interview Data Matrix Example ................................................................. 41 Figure 7 Overall schema of thematic analysis.......................................................... 42 Figure 8. Platform Overview .................................................................................... 43 Figure 9. Theme 1 - Interaction and subthemes ...................................................... 48 Figure 10. Theme 2 - Community and subthemes ................................................... 48 Figure 11. Theme 3 - Curation and Subthemes ....................................................... 49 Figure 12. Structure of Theme 1 and Sub-themes ................................................... 52 Figure 13 Twitch Chat Box ....................................................................................... 55 Figure 14. Tumblr post with comments .................................................................... 57 Figure 15. Twitch Homepage with Interaction Points ............................................... 62 Figure 16. Arrows indicate major conversation affordances .................................... 63 Figure 17. Twitter and Tumblr reblog buttons .......................................................... 64 Figure 18. Twitter Beginning Navigation .................................................................. 66 Figure 19. Emote Menu on Twitch ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Rhetoric: Toward an Integrated Theory
    TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 14(3), 319–325 Copyright © 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Digital Rhetoric: Toward an Integrated Theory James P. Zappen Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute This article surveys the literature on digital rhetoric, which encompasses a wide range of issues, including novel strategies of self-expression and collaboration, the characteristics, affordances, and constraints of the new digital media, and the forma- tion of identities and communities in digital spaces. It notes the current disparate na- ture of the field and calls for an integrated theory of digital rhetoric that charts new di- rections for rhetorical studies in general and the rhetoric of science and technology in particular. Theconceptofadigitalrhetoricisatonceexcitingandtroublesome.Itisexcitingbe- causeitholdspromiseofopeningnewvistasofopportunityforrhetoricalstudiesand troublesome because it reveals the difficulties and the challenges of adapting a rhe- torical tradition more than 2,000 years old to the conditions and constraints of the new digital media. Explorations of this concept show how traditional rhetorical strategies function in digital spaces and suggest how these strategies are being reconceived and reconfiguredDo within Not these Copy spaces (Fogg; Gurak, Persuasion; Warnick; Welch). Studies of the new digital media explore their basic characteris- tics, affordances, and constraints (Fagerjord; Gurak, Cyberliteracy; Manovich), their opportunities for creating individual identities (Johnson-Eilola; Miller; Turkle), and their potential for building social communities (Arnold, Gibbs, and Wright; Blanchard; Matei and Ball-Rokeach; Quan-Haase and Wellman). Collec- tively, these studies suggest how traditional rhetoric might be extended and trans- formed into a comprehensive theory of digital rhetoric and how such a theory might contribute to the larger body of rhetorical theory and criticism and the rhetoric of sci- ence and technology in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventing Computational Rhetoric
    INVENTING COMPUTATIONAL RHETORIC By Michael W. Wojcik A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Digital Rhetoric and Professional Writing — Master of Arts 2013 ABSTRACT INVENTING COMPUTATIONAL RHETORIC by Michael W. Wojcik Many disciplines in the humanities are developing “computational” branches which make use of information technology to process large amounts of data algorithmically. The field of computational rhetoric is in its infancy, but we are already seeing interesting results from applying the ideas and goals of rhetoric to text processing and related areas. After considering what computational rhetoric might be, three approaches to inventing computational rhetorics are presented: a structural schema, a review of extant work, and a theoretical exploration. Copyright by MICHAEL W. WOJCIK 2013 For Malea iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Above all else I must thank my beloved wife, Malea Powell, without whose prompting this thesis would have remained forever incomplete. I am also grateful for the presence in my life of my terrific stepdaughter, Audrey Swartz, and wonderful granddaughter Lucille. My thesis committee, Dean Rehberger, Bill Hart-Davidson, and John Monberg, pro- vided me with generous guidance and inspiration. Other faculty members at Michigan State who helped me explore relevant ideas include Rochelle Harris, Mike McLeod, Joyce Chai, Danielle Devoss, and Bump Halbritter. My previous academic program at Miami University did not result in a degree, but faculty there also contributed greatly to my the- oretical understanding, particularly Susan Morgan, Mary-Jean Corbett, Brit Harwood, J. Edgar Tidwell, Lori Merish, Vicki Smith, Alice Adams, Fran Dolan, and Keith Tuma.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. the Rhetoric, Science, and Technology of 21St Century Collaboration
    9. The Rhetoric, Science, and Technology of 21st Century Collaboration Ann Hill Duin University of Minnesota Jason Tham Texas Tech University Isabel Pedersen Ontario Tech University Abstract: We contend that collaboration is an imperative disciplinary as- sumption in technical and professional communication (TPC). Theorists, researchers, and practitioners grapple with ever-changing modes and models for collaborative work in academia, industry, and with communities. Tech- nical and professional communicators today must be prepared to collaborate with engineers, subject matter experts, and programmers; they must be adept at using collaborative software and working with global virtual teams. The purpose of this chapter is to synthesize the rhetoric, science, and technology of collaboration to consolidate a guiding framework for understanding, teaching, and practicing TPC collaboration in the 21st century and beyond. This unified framework provides guidance from which to structure one’s own collaboration and the collaborative projects we assign throughout our curriculum. We discuss collaborative software and team communication platforms and share example projects for preparing students for collaborative and global workplaces. Keywords: collaboration, rhetoric, technology, platforms, global virtual teams Key Takeaways: Collaboration across local and global contexts is an imperative disciplinary assumption in technical and professional communication (TPC). TPC instructors must prepare students for the collaborative frameworks and tools that
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Rhetoric of Cosmopolitanism: a Case Study of Thai Students at Michigan Technological University
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2019 Digital Rhetoric of Cosmopolitanism: A Case Study of Thai Students at Michigan Technological University Aranya Srijongjai Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2019 Aranya Srijongjai Recommended Citation Srijongjai, Aranya, "Digital Rhetoric of Cosmopolitanism: A Case Study of Thai Students at Michigan Technological University", Open Access Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2019. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/833 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Rhetoric Commons DIGITAL RHETORIC OF COSMOPOLITANISM: A CASE STUDY OF THAI STUDENTS AT MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY By Aranya Srijongjai A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Rhetoric, Theory and Culture MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Aranya Srijongjai This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Rhetoric, Theory and Culture. Department of Humanities Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Karla Kitalong Committee Member: Dr. Ronald Strickland Committee Member: Dr. Marika Seigel Committee Member: Dr. Beatrice Smith Committee Member: Dr. Chanon Adsanatham Department Chair: Dr. Ronald Strickland Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Writing in the Flow: Assembling Tactical Rhetorics in an Age of Viral Circulation
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Dustin Wayne Edwards Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ James Porter, Director ______________________________________ Heidi McKee, Reader ______________________________________ Jason Palmeri, Reader ______________________________________ Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ James Coyle, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT WRITING IN THE FLOW: ASSEMBLING TACTICAL RHETORICS IN AN AGE OF VIRAL CIRCULATION by Dustin W. Edwards From prompts to share, update, and retweet, social media platforms increasingly insist that creating widespread circulation is the operative goal for networked writing. In response, researchers from multiple disciplines have investigated digital circulation through a number of lenses (e.g., affect theory, transnational feminism, political economy, public sphere theory, and more). In rhetoric and writing studies, scholars have argued that writing for circulation—i.e., envisioning how one’s writing may gain speed, distance, and momentum—should be a prime concern for teachers and researchers of writing (e.g., Gries, 2015; Ridolfo & DeVoss, 2009; Porter, 2009; Sheridan, Ridolfo, & Michel, 2012). Such work has suggested that circulation is a consequence of rhetorical delivery and, as such, is distinctly about futurity. While a focus on writing for circulation has been productive, I argue that that writing in circulation can be equally productive. Challenging the tendency to position circulation as an exclusive concern for delivery, this project argues that circulation is not just as an end goal for rhetorical activity but also as a viable inventional resource for writers with diverse rhetorical goals. To make this case, I construct a methodology of assemblage to retell stories of tactical rhetorics.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypermedia, Internet Communication, and the Challenge of Redefining Literacy in the Electronic Age
    Language Learning & Technology September 2000, Volume 4, Number 2 http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/richards/default.html pp. 54-71 online (page numbers in PDF differ and should not be used for reference) HYPERMEDIA, INTERNET COMMUNICATION, AND THE CHALLENGE OF REDEFINING LITERACY IN THE ELECTRONIC AGE Cameron Richards National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. ABSTRACT This paper argues that the dominant hypermedia models of electronic literacy are too limited to do justice to new media and changing views of literacy in the electronic age, especially in terms of their recourse to postmodern theories of representation. Such models tend to interpret the use of digital media in relation to readers or users of information viewed as producers or constructors of their own meaning and identity (e.g., Bolter & Grusin, 1999; Landow, 1992; Poster, 1995). Such a perspective on the move from print to electronic literacy generally does not distinguish between the literal intention of an author or designer and a rhetorical strategy which frames and elicits responses by an audience or the "receivers" of communication, in short, a view of electronic media as ultimately a source of contingent or accidental meaning and discrete texts of information. A critique will be made of the limitations and contradictions of a general hypermedia perspective as a basis for engaging with and going beyond--not rejecting or denying-- the often innovative and useful contributions of hypermedia theorists to seek a more integrated, relevant, and grounded theory of electronic literacy in terms of a communications approach. This article thus attempts to practice as well as reflect the kind of "dialogical" approach to knowledge and human interaction advocated by Ricoeur when, for instance, challenging Derrida's poststructuralist delineation of writing and speaking as separate systems of communication (Ricoeur, 1976, 1978)--Derrida being one of the key references for a general hypermedia perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Back and Looking Forward: Digital Rhetoric As Evolving Field
    Looking Back and Looking Forward: Digital Rhetoric as Evolving Field ... http://enculturation.net/looking-back-and-looking-forward Douglas Eyman, George Mason University (Published November 22, 2016) In June of 2015, my long-term project on digital rhetoric, Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice, was published both in print and online by the University of Michigan Press. I selected Michigan because it offered both publication venues and allows for a creative commons license on the work—thus ensuring both open access and potential for re-use and remix; both of which I see as key practices for digital rhetoric scholarship (and which are also available in Enculturation of course). I started the book project in 2003, and it progressed through a series of iterations and revisions before being finished (or at least, in its publishable form) in 2013. As you can see, there has been a bit of time between the completion of the manuscript and the final publication—and in that time, there has been quite a bit of movement in the emerging field of digital rhetoric. 1 of 39 1/25/2017 2:15 PM Looking Back and Looking Forward: Digital Rhetoric as Evolving Field ... http://enculturation.net/looking-back-and-looking-forward At present, books are still primarily static objects. Most are not interactive and those that are printed become what Bruno Latour calls “immutable mobiles” (Science in Action, 7) with all of the affordances—but also the constraints—of their forms. We have the technical infrastructure that would allow a reconceptualization of the monograph or book to become an updateable, interactive, and collaborative knowledge ecology (a proposal I continue to tinker with and hope to demonstrate in the relatively near future), but we don’t have the social or economic means to so radically re-shape our scholarly traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric Beyond the Digital/Physical Divide: the Internet and Digital and Physical Hybridity
    Rhetoric Beyond the Digital/Physical Divide: The Internet and Digital and Physical Hybridity Andrew Kulak Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rhetoric and Writing Kelly E. Pender, Chair Chris Lindgren Katrina M. Powell Jennifer L. Sano-Franchini March 25, 2019 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Rhetoric, Writing, Technical Communication, Digital Rhetoric, Internet Copyright 2019, Andrew Kulak Rhetoric Beyond the Digital/Physical Divide: The Internet and Digital and Physical Hybridity Andrew Kulak (ABSTRACT) In this dissertation, I report findings from three case studies of rhetoric about the internet based on a rhetorical theory of the internet as physical and digital hybrid. I understand digital and physical hybridity as connections between physical and digital objects enabled by the internet that trouble a delineation between digital and physical space. I begin my study by tracing the history of the internet and its relationship with materiality. While the vastness of the internet is not something that can be readily understood, it is something that spreads across space and time, resulting in effects that demand rhetorical response. I describe rhetorics of purification as rhetorical responses to the internet that isolate physical and digital objects and ascribe to these objects different qualities. These rhetorics can be productive in rendering the internet and its effects salient within different discourses, but they can also be limiting in terms of aspects of the internet that they elide. To situate my work, I review literature in the field focused specifically on the emergence of digital rhetoric and its theories, methods, and objects of inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Rhetoric/Digital Media Boyd, Danah
    Digital Rhetoric and Digital Media James P. Zappen Selected Bibliography A. Digital Rhetoric: Theoretical Perspectives 1. Digital Rhetoric/Digital Media boyd, danah. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014. Bruns, Axel. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. Digital Formations. New York: Peter Lang, 2008. Carr, Nicholas. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011. The Ethics of Emerging Media: Information, Social Norms, and New Media Technology. Ed. Bruce E. Drushel and Kathleen German. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011. Eyman, Douglas. Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. Digital Humanities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015. Gurak, Laura J. Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with Awareness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001. —. Persuasion and Privacy in Cyberspace: The Online Protests over Lotus MarketPlace and the Clipper Chip. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997. Keen, Andrew. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet Is Killing Our Culture. New York: Doubleday, Currency, 2007. Lanier, Jaron. You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010. Lessig, Lawrence. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Perseus Books Group, Basic Books, 2006. —. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press, 2008. Lévy, Pierre. Becoming Virtual: Reality in the Digital Age. Trans. Robert Bononno. New York: Plenum Press, Plenum Trade, 1998. —. Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Trans. Robert Bononno. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Books Group, Helix Books, 1997. Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Rhetoric: Doing Things with Words Online Lisa M
    Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects 4-1-2012 Digital Rhetoric: Doing Things with Words Online Lisa M. Russell Kennesaw State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons Recommended Citation Russell, Lisa M., "Digital Rhetoric: Doing Things with Words Online" (2012). Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects. Paper 492. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. Digital Rhetoric: Doing Things with Words Online By Lisa M. Russell A capstone submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Professional Writing in the Department of English in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences of Kennesaw State University Kennesaw, Georgia 2012 Acknowledgements Dr. Amy Benson Brown gave me a new word recently, kismet. Kismet can be defined as destiny or fate or a prearranged series of events. My encounters in the MA in Professional Writing program at Kennesaw State University that culminated in this capstone project were kismet. Certainly it was predetermined that I should meet Dr. Anne Richards in the hallway between our offices five-years ago. I made a lame joke, and somehow, we still became friends. Dr. Richards would play an important role in my life by encouraging me to applying to the MA in Professional Writing program. She is a natural mentor and encourager; she pushed and sometimes dragged me across the graduation finish line.
    [Show full text]
  • POST-DIGITAL RHETORIC and the NEW AESTHETIC NEW DIRECTIONS in RHETORIC and MATERIALITY Barbara A
    POST-DIGITAL RHETORIC AND THE NEW AESTHETIC NEW DIRECTIONS IN RHETORIC AND MATERIALITY Barbara A. Biesecker, Wendy S. Hesford, and Christa Teston, Series Editors POST-DIGITAL RHETORIC AND THE NEW AESTHETIC JUSTIN HODGSON THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Th is edition licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. Th is book is freely available in an open access edition thanks to TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem)—a collaboration of the Association of American Universities, the Association of University Presses, and the Association of Research Libraries—and the generous support of India na University Bloomington. Learn more at the TOME website, which can be found at the following web address: http://openmonographs.org. Copyright © 2019 by Th e Ohio State University. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Hodgson, Justin, author. Title: Post-digital rhetoric and the new aesthetic / Justin Hodgson. Other titles: New directions in rhetoric and materiality. Description: Columbus : Th e Ohio State University Press, [2019] | Series: New directions in rhetoric and materiality | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifi ers: LCCN 2018048555 | ISBN 9780814213940 (cloth ; alk. paper) | ISBN 0814213944 (cloth ; alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Rhetoric—Data processing. | Aesthetics. | Digital media. Classifi cation: LCC P301.5.D37 H63 2019 | DDC 801/.93—dc23 LC record available at https://lc cn.loc.gov/2018048555 Cover design by Angela Moody Text design by Juliet Williams Type set in Adobe Minion Pro Th is work was (partially) funded by the Offi ce of the Vice Provost of Research and the Arts and Humanities Council at India na University Bloomington through the Public Arts Grant.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT REID. GWENDOLYNNE COLLINS. Digital Writing in The
    ABSTRACT REID. GWENDOLYNNE COLLINS. Digital Writing in the Disciplines: Imagining Possibilities for Scholarship in the Context of Digital Media. (Under the direction of Dr. Carolyn R. Miller and Dr. Chris M. Anson). In the quarter century since the establishment of the graphically browsable World Wide Web, academic composers and publishers have experimented with the range of affordances presented by networked digital media—affordances such as modularity, interactivity, multimodality, dynamism, associativity, etc. This experimentation, along with the increasingly widespread use of information and communication technologies and digital media across social contexts, has transformed academic rhetorical environments, presenting scholars with new possibilities and constraints. This transformation has substantially complicated the rhetorical knowledge and literacies necessary for scholarly communicators to operate effectively. This transformation, however, is still an emerging phenomenon, with ongoing experiments that continue to alter the genres and sociotechnical relationships that comprise scholarly work. In the last decade, for example, publisher Elsevier launched digital “Article of the Future” prototypes in several of its journals, while several publishers, universities, and organizations have worked to produce platforms for academic publishers and academics to more easily publish born-digital scholarship. The emerging nature of this changing scholarly landscape provides an exigence and opportunity for understanding scholars’ lived experiences of composing during a moment of transition, and specifically for understanding the forces that shape how and why they take up the multiple affordances presented by digital media. This dissertation takes up that exigence, focusing on disciplinarity as a force unique to and particularly influential in academic contexts and asking how scholars’ digital and multimodal composing shapes and is shaped by disciplinarity.
    [Show full text]