DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT ALTERNATIVES for the GGNRA in SAN MATEO COUNTY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT ALTERNATIVES for the GGNRA in SAN MATEO COUNTY DRAFT ALTERNATIVES for the GGNRA in SAN MATEO COUNTY Current Conditions and Management PREFERRED: Preserving and Enjoying Coastal Ecosystems Focusing on National Treasures Connecting People with the Parks Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Overview At the time the previous general management plan In all three alternatives, park lands and marine As in the other alternatives, park lands and marine As in the other alternatives, park lands and marine (GMP) was developed, the GGNRA did not manage any environments in San Mateo County would be managed environments in San Mateo County would be managed environments in San Mateo County would be managed land in San Mateo County. Since that time, the park as part of a vast network of protected lands and as part of a vast network of protected lands and as part of a vast network of protected lands and has grown to include almost 30,000 acres within its waters, some recognized as part of the UNESCO waters. In this alternative, however, park managers waters. This alternative, however, would highlight how boundaries in San Mateo County. Golden Gate Biosphere Reserve. This network includes would place greater emphasis on preservation and this “quilt” of undeveloped land has been protected by SFPUC watershed lands, California state parks, the restoration of these dynamic, interconnected coastal numerous organizations. Over the past 20 years, the Stretching along the San Mateo coast to Corral de Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, county parks, ecosystems through collaborative partnerships with National Park Service, local governments, private land Tierra and inland to the Phleger Estate, the southern and other land held by regional land trusts. other land management agencies in the region. trusts, and dedicated individuals have worked hand in park lands feature a remarkable wealth of natural and Together these groups would work to sustain the hand to acquire and preserve this “Wilderness Next historic resources. From rugged coastal bluffs and In the spirit of the “Parks to People” movement that area’s native biodiversity, reconnect fragmented Door.” windswept ridgelines to a redwood forest, wetlands, created the Golden Gate National Recreation Area habitats and migration corridors, minimize the impact and streams, these lands support an abundance of more than three decades ago, this alternative would of invasive species, manage for changing fire regimes, Today, these lands are a national treasure of plants and wildlife and tell the story of the people who focus on the importance of improving access and and restore naturally functioning ecosystems. Pro-active recreational, natural, and cultural resources. Several have shaped this peninsula over generations. community engagement in GGNRA’s park lands. Given management would build into the environment greater nationally significant historic sites are in San Mateo the significant addition of park land in the county in resiliency to climate change. County, along with habitat for numerous endangered GGNRA’s park lands in San Mateo County serve a large recent years, a series of actions would be needed to species. Many of these important resources are and diverse local population, offering unsurpassed enhance visitor access, enjoyment, appreciation, and The GGNRA’s park lands in San Mateo County provide managed by other agencies on nearby sites. This opportunities for recreation and enjoyment. Whether stewardship. Park managers would emphasize an extensive wildlife corridor that includes habitat for alternative would focus on protecting resources in the enjoying the trails, strolling the beaches, or taking in preservation and restoration of the area’s vital threatened and endangered species. Under this park while developing recreational and thematic panoramic views up and down the Pacific coast, there ecosystems through collaborative partnerships with alternative, these lands would serve as living connections between sites managed by other land are unlimited ways to explore and appreciate these other land management agencies. laboratories, engaging visitors in participatory science, managers. park lands education, and stewardship — activities that nurture Key efforts would include increasing the visibility and personal connections with nature and inspire advocacy. This alternative also looks beyond the immediate park Currently the National Park Service’s presence in San identity of NPS sites. Park trails would be improved to lands to explore the potential to stimulate regional Mateo is limited, sites are not well identified, and there create a sustainable system that provides opportunities Exploration along the vast network of trails would landscape management and enhance heritage tourism. are few basic facilities to support access. Management to enjoy park sites, connects with local communities, further highlight the park’s diverse ecosystems and rich To do so, park managers would work with of park land in San Mateo County is guided by the and contributes to an exceptional regional trail cultural resources. Cultural resource sites and stories — communities between Pacifica and Santa Cruz to park’s authorizing legislation (its purpose) and the network. A comprehensive trail plan would be archeological sites, European exploration, agricultural support the National Scenic Byway designation of the management policies common to units of the national prepared to achieve these goals. Park managers would land uses, coastal defense sites, and the lighthouse — Pacific Coast Highway (Hwy 1). The highway is one of park system. Although a general management plan work with county transit providers to improve transit would emphasize human occupation of the coastal the unifying features of the rural coast, and is amendment was approved for Sweeney Ridge in 1985, connections to local trailheads and cross-county transit environment. Most cultural resources would be characterized by forested hills, small-scale agriculture, this current general management plan will provide connections along Highway 1. stabilized as discovery sites if not in conflict with and seaside communities. management guidance for the first time to the other natural resource restoration. GGNRA park sites in San Mateo County. The addition of signs and trailhead parking will help visitors find their way to various park sites and will help Land protection strategies would seek to reconnect Site planning for other places like Mori Point has also them gain an understanding of the park’s diverse fragmented endangered species habitat and strive to been completed. The park has consulted with other natural and cultural resources. Equestrian needs would remove features that impede movement or migration agencies to achieve fundamental park goals, as be incorporated in trail and trailhead design. of species, or disrupt ecological function. regarding the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Equally important would be providing facilities to (SFPUC) watershed, where the park holds scenic and welcome visitors to the park. This alternative would recreational easements. promote visitor information and orientation centers in Pacifica and in the Coastside community south of Devil’s Slide. These facilities could be shared with San Mateo County Department of Parks, California State Parks, NOAA/Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, and other organizations. [Is Hwy 1 Scenic Byway common?] GGNRA in San Mateo County – Draft Alternatives – March 2009, Page 1 DRAFT ALTERNATIVES for the GGNRA in SAN MATEO COUNTY Current Conditions and Management PREFERRED: Preserving and Enjoying Coastal Ecosystems Focusing on National Treasures Connecting People with the Parks Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Thornton GGNRA manages approximately 30 acres in 2 parcels in Natural Zone Natural Zone Natural Zone State Beach to this geologically dynamic coastline: one parcel south of South of Thornton State beach and one parcel south of Mussel In all alternatives park managers would preserve and Same as Alternative 1. Same as Alternative 1. Mussel Rock Rock. No improvements have been made by the park enhance the natural and scenic values of the area; for public access and there is no active park presence in allow for natural coastal geologic processes to this area. In the absence of a general management continue; and provide modest visitor access facilities plan, current management is guided by the park’s (trails, trailheads) to beaches, scenic overlooks, and authorizing legislation (its purpose) and the along the California Coastal Trail, where feasible. management policies common to units of the national park system. The beach, dunes, and cliffs extending from San Francisco’s Ocean Beach south to Mussel Rock (a stretch of almost 5 miles) would be managed to protect shorebird habitat, allow natural shoreline processes to continue unimpeded, and provide improved or new trails for visitors to enjoy and view nature. Milagra Ridge Added to the park in 1987, the area is managed to Natural Zone Natural Zone Natural Zone protect and restore natural habitat, (especially endangered species habitat), to protect historic coastal The area would be managed to preserve its wild The land would be managed to preserve the wild Same as Alternative 2. defense fortifications, and to provide public access character and protect habitat for endangered species. character of the area and protect endangered species through a system of trails so people can enjoy the site Heavily disturbed areas would be restored. habitat. Heavily disturbed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National List of Beaches 2008
    National List of Beaches September 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-08-004 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama........................................................................................................................................... 3 Alaska .............................................................................................................................................. 5 California.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 15 Delaware........................................................................................................................................ 17 Florida ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • California's Ocean Economy
    Center for the Blue Economy Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy Publications National Ocean Economics Program Summer 7-1-2005 CALIFORNIA’S OCEAN ECONOMY Judith T. Kildow Dr National Ocean Economic Program, [email protected] Charles S. Colgan University of Southern Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://cbe.miis.edu/noep_publications Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the International Economics Commons Recommended Citation Kildow, Judith T. Dr and Colgan, Charles S., "CALIFORNIA’S OCEAN ECONOMY" (2005). Publications. 8. https://cbe.miis.edu/noep_publications/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Ocean Economics Program at Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA’S OCEAN ECONOMY Abstract California’s Ocean Economy is the most expansive study of its kind in the nation and provides an update to the 1994 economic study conducted by the California Research Bureau and later released as part of the Resources Agency ocean strategy titled, California’s Ocean Resources: An Agenda for the Future. This report from the National Ocean Economics Program (NOEP) provides a more comprehensive understanding of the economic role of California’s ocean resources than has been available to date. It also provides California with strong evidence that its unique ocean and coastal resources are important to sustaining California’s economy. This information highlights the economic importance of the ocean and coast to California and the nation and underscores the need for continued leadership in balancing resource protection and economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Preliminary Environmental Considerations
    8 Preliminary Environmental Considerations Consideration of the environmental impacts of each of the alternatives is essential to the selection of a preferred alternative. Environmental impacts range from the effects of the project on the natural and built environments to compliance with regulatory requirements. Coordinating with public agencies and stakeholders involved in the project area will be essential to successfully permitting and constructing the proposed flood control improvements. Due to the proximity of the construction activities to people, traffic, wetlands, coastal recreation areas, and water storage facilities, many governmental agencies will be involved in the evaluation, design, permitting, and monitoring of the project development. Generally, the environmental issues that will be investigated include effects on: • Bird habitat; • Beach erosion and access; • Water quality, public health, and safety; • Recreation activities and park resources; • Aesthetics; and, • Ocean resources 8.1 Ecological Setting The natural and built environments were examined at the following locations: Lake Merced, Westlake Park, the Vista Grande Canal corridor, John Muir Drive, Fort Funston / Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and Thornton State Beach. 8.1.1 Lake Merced South Lake and Impound Lakes are the two lakes that could be directly impacted by the Vista Grande Canal overflows. Lake Merced is the largest freshwater lake in San Francisco, and is a valuable natural resource and recreational area for nearby communities. Lake Merced is the largest expanse of wetland habitat in San Francisco and supports an array of sensitive plant and animal species, as well as being a valuable refuge for migratory birds (SFRPD, 2006). Wetland areas, particularly those at Impound Lake, are known to contain sensitive plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • 203287 TP Final Vol 2.Ai
    4.7 Cultural Resources 4.7 Cultural4.7 4. WSIP Facility Projects – Setting and Impacts 4.7 Cultural Resources Cultural resources include paleontological resources, archaeological resources, historical resources, and human remains. This section provides a program-level assessment of potential WSIP impacts on historical, paleontological, or archaeological resources that might be present in the vicinity of the WSIP projects and/or historic water system facilities. Programmatic mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate potentially significant impacts on these cultural resources are identified in this section and presented in detail in Chapter 6. This analysis does not identify specific cultural resources at each of the 22 WSIP facility project sites, although some previously identified cultural resources are located at or near those project sites. Site-specific analysis will be conducted as part of separate, project-level CEQA review for individual WSIP projects. 4.7.1 Setting and Resource Types Paleontological Setting Paleontological resources within the WSIP study area consist of the fossilized remains of plants and animals, including vertebrates (animals with backbones) and invertebrates (e.g., starfish, clams, ammonites, and coral marine). Fossils of microscopic plants and animals, or microfossils, are also considered in this analysis. The age and abundance of fossils depend on the location, topographic setting, and particular geologic formation in which they are found. The geologic formations containing the majority of fossils in the WSIP study area are considered geologically young; the oldest fossil-bearing formation dates to the Paleocene epoch (65 million years old). Most of the fossil-bearing geologic units in the WSIP study area were formed in ancient marine environments such as inland embayments, coastal areas, and extensive inland seas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anza Trail Guide
    San Francisco Bay Area The Anza Trail Guide San Mateo County - San Francisquito Creek to San Mateo Creek San Francisco Bay Area The Anza Trail Guide San Mateo County - San Francisquito Creek to San Mateo Creek Driving Directions for Auto Route Hiking/Biking Ideas While driving to San Mateo County north on theSan El Camino Mateo Real, The exploratory group surveyed the area turn right on Alma Street after University Ave., and follow Palo around the San Andreas and Crystal Alto Ave. to visit the Palo Alto redwood tree on the banks of the Springs reservoirs. This area provided San Francisquito Creek. Returning to El Camino Real northbound, many of the timbers used to build the take Arroyo Court west in the City of San Mateo to see California San Francisco Presidio and Mission. Historical Landmark No. 47County and park commemorating campsite Map Hiking and biking trails are available #96. To visit the Crystal Springs area, turn west on Crystal via Cañada and Skyline Roads. These Springs Rd. and north or south on Skyline Blvd. Return to El trails, as well as those of the San Camino Real north and turn left in Burlingame on Ralston Ave. Francisco Bay Trail and the Coyote traveling one block to Heritage Park at Occidental Avenue. This is Point County Recreational Area, offer goes here close to expedition campsite #94. Continue north on El Camino opportunities to experience some of the Real, and in Daly City, turn left (west) onto John Daly Blvd. to bay’s environment as the Anza CA 1 north, and head to San Francisco County.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet Friday, November 6, 2020
    Board of Directors Board Meeting Packet Friday, November 6, 2020 SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR FRIDAY, November 6, 2020 at 11:00 AM Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at: https://youtu.be/ac97WleuZvM Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/98646766885 * Note that this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment.
    [Show full text]
  • 22Nd in Beachwater Quality 10% of Samples Exceeded National Standards in 2010
    CALIFORNIA† See Additional Information About California’s Beach Data Management 22nd in Beachwater Quality 10% of samples exceeded national standards in 2010 Polluted urban and suburban runoff is a major threat to water quality at the nation’s coastal beaches. Runoff from storms and irrigation carries pollution from parking lots, yards, and streets directly to waterways. In some parts of the country, stormwater routinely causes overflows from sewage systems. Innovative solutions known as green infrastructure enable communities to naturally absorb or use runoff before it causes problems. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is modernizing its national rules for sources of runoff pollution and should develop strong, green infrastructure-based requirements. California has more than 500 miles of coastal beaches, spread among over 400 beaches along the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay coastline. The California Department of Health Services administers the BEACH Act grant. Current approved methods for determining fecal indicator bacteria counts in beachwater depend on growth of cultures in samples and take at least 24 hours to process. Because of this, swimmers do not know until the next day if the water they swam in was contaminated. Likewise, beaches may be left closed even after water quality meets standards. There is a great deal of interest in technologies that can provide same-day beachwater quality results. During the 2010 beach season, researchers funded by the California State Water Board and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act tested a rapid method called quantitative polymerase chain reaction, or qPCR, at nine sampling locations in Orange County five days a week.
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS No
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. C08E0019 Architectural and Engineering Professional Services for Projects in the California State Park System November 2008 State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Acquisition and Development Division State of California Request for Qualifications No. C08E0019 Department of Parks and Recreation Architectural and Engineering Professional Services Acquisition and Development Division for Projects in the California State Parks System TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Type of Professional Services......................................................................................... 3 1.3 RFQ Issuing Office .......................................................................................................... 5 1.4 SOQ Delivery and Deadline ............................................................................................ 5 1.5 Withdrawal of SOQ.......................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Rejection of SOQ ............................................................................................................ 6 1.7 Awards of Master Agreements ........................................................................................ 6 SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 Locations and Descriptions of Potential Projects ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peninsula Open May Be Selected to Plan a Geology Field Trip
    65 7. Field Trip to the Skyline Ridge Area also include excursions to the fault itself in the Los Trancos and Monte Bello Open Space preserves. The inclusion of all in the Central Santa Cruz Mountains stops listed below might be possible only with an early start and plans for a long day in the field. Stop descriptions below Trip highlights: San Andreas Fault scarps, sag ponds, vegeta- include information about interesting geologic features in the tion and bedrock contrasts, regional vistas, Quaternary gravels, vicinity, but they may require additional hiking to visit (fig. Tertiary marine rocks, ancient submarine landslide deposits, 7-1). volcanic rocks (Mindego Basalt), Native American mortar Note that rattlesnakes can be encountered anywhere. holes in sandstone Poison oak is prevalent, and ticks can be encountered any time of year, but mostly in the spring. The area is also mountain This field-trip guide includes a collection of stops that lion habitat. It is advisable to contact the Midpeninsula Open may be selected to plan a geology field trip. The field-trip Space District before planning group visits to the preserves; stops are along Highway 9 (Saratoga Road) and Highway 35 maps and information are available on their website at http:// (Skyline Boulevard) between Castle Rock State Park and La www.openspace.org. Honda on Highway 84. Most stops are on lands maintained Geologic maps with descriptions of this region include by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. Outcrop Brabb and others (1997, 1998, and 2000). These maps are and natural areas along the ridgeline crest of the Santa Cruz ideal for field-trip discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Springs Reservoir and the Chance to to Chance the and Reservoir Springs Crystal
    November 2017 November paper recycled on Printed C Topher Simon Topher Wild places & friendly spaces spaces friendly & places Wild Wild places & friendly spaces friendly & places Wild San Mateo County Parks County Mateo San Topher Simon Topher community. For information, visit www.SupportParks.org. visit information, For community. funds to improve the quality of County Parks for our our for Parks County of quality the improve to funds Foundation Parks County Mateo San The raises raises Horse Patrol, trail work days, and special events. special and days, work trail Patrol, Horse volunteer programs, including Trail Patrol, Volunteer Volunteer Patrol, Trail including programs, volunteer parklands and serve park visitors through ongoing ongoing through visitors park serve and parklands volunteer can You to help rangers protect and improve improve and protect rangers help to Support your parks your Support unlimited entrances to all County Parks for a year. a for Parks County all to entrances unlimited The Department sells annual passes, offering offering passes, annual sells Department The sunny picnic areas, and popular playgrounds. popular and areas, picnic sunny forests, and remote campsites to Bayfront shoreline, shoreline, Bayfront to campsites remote and forests, natural settings, from rugged tidepools, lush mountain mountain lush tidepools, rugged from settings, natural The parks The represent our region’s wondrously diverse diverse wondrously region’s our represent encompassing more than 17,000 acres. 17,000 than more encompassing and historic sites located throughout the County and and County the throughout located sites historic and travel parallel to the San Andreas Fault. Andreas San the to parallel travel system’s properties include parks, preserves, trails, trails, preserves, parks, include properties system’s opportunities for education and recreation.
    [Show full text]