DOCSLIB.ORG

REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. C08E0019 Architectural and Engineering Professional Services for Projects in the California State Park System November 2008 State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Acquisition and Development Division State of California Request for Qualifications No. C08E0019 Department of Parks and Recreation Architectural and Engineering Professional Services Acquisition and Development Division for Projects in the California State Parks System TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Type of Professional Services......................................................................................... 3 1.3 RFQ Issuing Office .......................................................................................................... 5 1.4 SOQ Delivery and Deadline ............................................................................................ 5 1.5 Withdrawal of SOQ.......................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Rejection of SOQ ............................................................................................................ 6 1.7 Awards of Master Agreements ........................................................................................ 6 SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 Locations and Descriptions of Potential Projects ............................................................ 7 2.2 Projected Timetable ........................................................................................................7 2.3 Detailed Scope of Work................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Scope of Basic Services.................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Work Order Procedure for Potential Projects .................................................................. 8 SECTION 3 – RESPONDING TO THIS RFQ 3.1 Minimum Requirements ................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Selection Criteria ........................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Evaluation and Selection Process................................................................................. 12 SECTION 4 – ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS AND REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Master Agreement for Services..................................................................................... 13 4.2 Insurance Requirements ............................................................................................... 13 4.3 Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Requirements................................................... 14 ATTACHMENTS A. RFQ Checklist B. Project List – Northern & Southern Service Centers C. Sample Forms 1. State Standard Agreement (STD 213) with a. Exhibit A, Scope of Work (DPR 603) b. Exhibit B, Budget Detail and Payment Provisions (DPR 604) c. Exhibit B, Attachment I, Sample Work Order d. Exhibit C, General Terms and Conditions (GTC 307) by reference e. Exhibit D, Special Terms and Conditions (DPR 605) 2. California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program a. California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program Requirements b. Documentation of Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program Requirements (STD 840) c. Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Declarations (STD 843) November 2008 Page 1 of 14 (RFQ Form Rev: 08-07) State of California Request for Qualifications No. C08E0019 Department of Parks and Recreation Architectural and Engineering Professional Services Acquisition and Development Division for Projects in the California State Parks System SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 The State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) is requesting Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) for Architectural and Engineering Services for projects located in the California State Parks System for the disciplines of Architecture, Historic Architecture, Landscape Architecture-Design, Land Surveying, Geotechnical Engineering, Testing-Lab and Field, Civil Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Electrical Engineering-Lighting Design, Structural Engineering and Historic Structural Engineering. Services for potential projects include, however are not limited to, some or all of the following: study, planning, schematics, preliminary design, design development, preparation of construction documents, estimating, specification writing, preparation of building analyses for existing historic and non-historic structures, obtaining permits from state agencies such as the State Fire Marshall and the Access Compliance Section of the Division of State Architect. Potential projects will include, however not be limited to, building and civil systems renovation, rehabilitation of historic structures, new construction, and remediation/mitigation projects. Firms (Contractors) will be selected and designated to perform Professional Services throughout California. 1.1.2 Contractors shall be selected, on the basis of written responses to this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and an interview, to perform services for a term not to exceed two (2) years. Unless, upon mutual consent, a formal extension of the term of the Agreement is authorized by DPR and issued in the form of an Agreement Amendment. DPR does not guarantee that an Agreement shall be written from this RFQ. 1.1.3 Because the scope and number of projects and tasks are unknown at the time of Agreement execution, under this RFQ the Agreement is known as a “Master Agreement”. Services will be contracted on a Work Order basis, as project(s) requirement(s) dictate. (See 2.5 Work Order Procedure for Potential Projects.) DPR and Contractor agree that no specific quantity of work is guaranteed to be provided to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. DPR does not guarantee that Contractor will be assigned a project specific Work Order during the term of the Agreement. 1.1.4 Contractor shall provide all services required by, and in accordance with, each project specific Work Order and such other necessary and incidental services that are required to provide professional services for the project(s). 1.1.5 If Contractor is unable to furnish adequate services, fails to perform tasks such as deliverables or does not achieve project milestones or deadlines, DPR reserves the November 2008 Page 2 of 14 (RFQ Form Rev: 08-07) State of California Request for Qualifications No. C08E0019 Department of Parks and Recreation Architectural and Engineering Professional Services Acquisition and Development Division for Projects in the California State Parks System right to discontinue using Contractor’s services on that project and for any future projects. If Contractor fails to perform or does not have the resources to handle all the projects requiring services, DPR reserves the right to contract with the ranked Contractor(s) in order of rank, for the services. Contractor must achieve all deliverables and deadlines on time in order to facilitate DPR’s goal. Contractor shall communicate any anticipated problem with achieving project deliverables and/or deadlines. 1.1.6 The Master Agreement is subject to DPR review and approval of Contractor’s performance at six (6)-month intervals. 1.2 TYPE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1.2.1 Contractors may submit qualifications for any of the disciplines listed. SOQs shall indicate the types and shall discuss for each type of professional services for which qualifications are being submitted, the firm’s ability to produce designs, complete construction documents, studies, reports or other required documents and products, including plans, specifications and cost estimates. (Refer to Section 3.1 Minimum Requirements) Selections will be made for the following professional services disciplines: Architecture: Experience in and knowledge of small to mid size public and recreational structures, including visitor centers with exhibit design components; an understanding of park architecture and design principles and; working knowledge of the California Building Code. Historic Architecture: Experience in and knowledge of the restoration and rehabilitation of historic structures that are small to mid size public, residential and recreational structures, working knowledge and experience with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards, the California Building Code, the State Historical Building Code and documenting historic structures and preparing Historic Structures Reports. Landscape Architecture - Design: Licensed Landscape Architect, experienced in the planning, design, and construction of recreational facilities. Land Surveying: Experience with digital terrain modeling, photogrammetry, aerial photo mapping, topographic mapping, GIS, and surveying to assist in site analysis for design purposes and ownership boundary location. Geotechnical Engineering: Surface and subsurface testing and analysis for the design and placement of public and recreational facilities of all kinds. Experience in road alignments, slope stabilization, erosion protection structures, bridge abutments, onsite wastewater disposal systems and building placement. Testing – Lab and Field: Experience in all types of materials testing and sampling both in the field and
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
  • Grooming Veterinary Pet Guidelines Doggie Dining

    Grooming Veterinary Pet Guidelines Doggie Dining

    PET GUIDELINES GROOMING VETERINARY We welcome you and your furry companions to Ventana Big Sur! In an effort to ensure the peace and tranquility of all guests, we ask for your PET FOOD EXPRESS MONTEREY PENINSULA assistance with the following: 204 Mid Valley Shopping VETERINARY EMERGENCY & Carmel, CA SPECIALTY CENTER A non-refundable, $150 one-time fee per pet 831-622-9999 20 Lower Ragsdale Drive will be charged to your guestroom/suite. Do-it-yourself pet wash Suite 150 Monterey, CA Pets must be leashed at all times while on property. 831.373.7374 24 hours, weekends and holidays Pets are restricted from the following areas: Pool or pool areas The Sur House dining room Spa Alila Organic garden Owners must be present, or the pet removed from the room, for housekeeping to freshen your guestroom/suite. If necessary, owners will be required to interrupt activities to attend to a barking dog that may be disrupting other guests. Our concierge is happy to help you arrange pet sitting through a local vendor (see back page) if desired. These guidelines are per county health codes; the only exceptions are for certified guide dogs. DOGGIE DINING We want all of our guests to have unforgettable dining experiences at Ventana—so we created gourmet meals for our furry friends, too! Available 7 a.m. to 10 p.m through In Room Dining or at Sur House. Chicken & Rice $12 Organic Chicken Breast / Fresh Garden Vegetables / Basmati Rice Coco Patty $12 Naturally Raised Ground Beef / Potato / Garden Vegetables Salmon Bowl $14 Salmon / Basmati Rice / Sweet Potato
  • News Release

    News Release

    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Roy Stearns May 22, 2009 (916) 654-7538 California State Parks Named in ReserveAmerica’s “Top 100 Family Campgrounds” Awards Program California State Parks were named in ReserveAmerica’s “Top 100 Family Campgrounds” awards program. ReserveAmerica, a leading recreation reservation and campground management company, announced the winners of their annual “Top 100 Family Campgrounds” awards program. The winning parks were selected based on testimonials, campground ratings and feedback provided by park rangers, regional park management and campers throughout the year. Campgrounds were determined on specific family-friendly criteria ranging from educational programs and visitor centers to camping amenities and overall beauty and scenery. Other factors considered included the quality and availability of hot showers, laundry facilities, hiking trails, family beaches, radio-free zones, visitor centers, educational programs, children’s events and location. Here are the California State Parks chosen in the awards program: 2009 Top 100 Family Campgrounds Anza-Borrego Desert State Park-San Diego, CA Castle Crags State Park-Shasta, CA Millerton Lake State Recreation Area-Fresno, CA Morro Bay State Park-San Luis, CA Sonoma Coast State Beach-Sonoma, CA Top 25 Amazing Spots San Simeon State Park-Cambria, CA Top 25 Biking Trails Cuyamaca Rancho State Park-San Diego, CA (more) For energy efficient recreation - California State Parks on the Internet: <http://www.parks.ca.gov>
  • Doggin' America's Beaches

    Doggin' America's Beaches

    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
  • Beach Report Card Program Is Funded by Grants From

    Beach Report Card Program Is Funded by Grants From

    2013-2014 Annual 2013–2014 Heal the Bay is a nonprofit environmental organization making Southern California coastal waters and watersheds, including Santa Monica Bay, safe, healthy and clean. We use science, education, community action and advocacy to pursue our mission. The Beach Report Card program is funded by grants from Swain Barber Foundation ©2014 Heal the Bay. All Rights Reserved. The fishbones logo is a trademark of Heal the Bay. The Beach Report Card is a service mark of Heal the Bay. We at Heal the Bay believe the public has the right to know the water quality at their favorite beaches. We are proud to provide West Coast residents and visitors with this information in an easy-to-understand format. We hope beachgoers will use this information to make the decisions necessary to protect their health. This page: Avalon Bay, Catalina Island Cover photo: The Wedge, Newport Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE Introduction Executive Summary 6 SECTION TWO The Beach Report Card County by County Summary Reports 16 SECTION THREE BRC Impacts and News California Beach Types and Water Quality 48 The Clean Beach Initiative (CBI) 50 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) 53 Major Beach News 55 Recommendations for the Coming Year 65 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 70 SECTION FOUR Appendices Methodology for California 76 Methodology for Oregon and Washington 78 2013-2014 Honor Roll 80 Grades by County – California 81 Grades by County – Washington 94 Grades by County – Oregon 97 Index and Glossary 98 Acknowledgements 100 5 Executive Summary Beaches in the U.S. accommodate nearly two billion beach visits each year1 and provide enormous economic benefits to their communities.
  • Fire Management Newsletter: Eucalyptus: a Complex Challenge

    Fire Management Newsletter: Eucalyptus: a Complex Challenge

    Golden Gate National Recreation Area National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Point Reyes National Seashore EucalyptusEucalyptus A Complex Challenge AUSTRALIA FIRE MANAGEMENT, RESOURCE PROTECTION, AND THE LEGACY OF TASMANIAN BLUE GUM DURING THE AGE OF EXPLORATION, CURIOUS SPECIES dead, dry, oily leaves and debris—that is especially flammable. from around the world captured the imagination, desire and Carried by long swaying branches, fire spreads quickly in enterprising spirit of many different people. With fragrant oil and eucalyptus groves. When there is sufficient dead material in the massive grandeur, eucalyptus trees were imported in great canopy, fire moves easily through the tree tops. numbers from Australia to the Americas, and California became home to many of them. Adaptations to fire include heat-resistant seed capsules which protect the seed for a critical short period when fire reaches the CALIFORNIA Eucalyptus globulus, or Tasmanian blue gum, was first introduced crowns. One study showed that seeds were protected from lethal to the San Francisco Bay Area in 1853 as an ornamental tree. heat penetration for about 4 minutes when capsules were Soon after, it was widely planted for timber production when exposed to 826o F. Following all types of fire, an accelerated seed domestic lumber sources were being depleted. Eucalyptus shed occurs, even when the crowns are only subjected to intense offered hope to the “Hardwood Famine”, which the Bay Area heat without igniting. By reseeding when the litter is burned off, was keenly aware of, after rebuilding from the 1906 earthquake. blue gum eucalyptus like many other species takes advantage of the freshly uncovered soil that is available after a fire.
  • 2018 Meeting Planner's Guide

    2018 Meeting Planner's Guide

    2018 Meeting Planner’s Guide A Unit of California State Parks Sales and Conference Services Team For sales and marketing Tim McGill Senior Sales Manager – Association Market Denise Morton 831.642.4220 [email protected] Director of Sales and Marketing Sales Manager – Small Meetings & Family Reunions Lauren Ross 831.642.4225 [email protected] Group Sales Office 831.642.4222 Senior Sales Manager – Educational & Government Market Linda Casey 831.642.4217 [email protected] 8:00am–5:00pm Monday–Friday Sales Manager – Corporate Market Ashley Soria 831.642.4228 [email protected] For catering and meeting room information Germar Kelly Conference Services Manager Raymond Jocson 831.642.4230 [email protected] Director of Conference Services Conference Services Manager Lindsay Brooks 831.642.4295 [email protected] 8:00am–5:00pm Monday–Friday Event Coordinator Natascha von Thiele 831.642.4231 [email protected] For In-house registration information Vivian Garcia, Reservations Manager Housing Bureau Agent Pat Kauffman 831.624.4218 [email protected] 8:00am–5:00pm Monday–Friday Housing Bureau Agent Karen Grimshaw 831.642.4272 [email protected] 800 Asilomar Avenue Pacific Grove, California 93950 831.372.8016 Fax 831.642.4262 www.VisitAsilomar.com Visitor’s Information What’s the weather like at Asilomar? Three ice machines are located on the Asilomar Spring and fall are clear and sunny, and the grounds (see Asilomar Grounds Map). Ice summer months bring morning fog that buckets are located in the guestrooms. encases the landscape, burning off to clear Call housekeeping extension 2276 for lost skies in the afternoons.
  • The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan

    The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan

    The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners in Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2004 Conservation Plan Authors Grant Ballard, PRBO Conservation Science Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science Tom Gardali, PRBO Conservation Science Geoffrey R. Geupel, PRBO Conservation Science Tonya Haff, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Museum of Natural History Collections, Environmental Studies Dept., University of CA) Aaron Holmes, PRBO Conservation Science Diana Humple, PRBO Conservation Science John C. Lovio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy (Currently at TAIC, San Diego) Mike Lynes, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Hastings University) Sandy Scoggin, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at San Francisco Bay Joint Venture) Christopher Solek, Cal Poly Ponoma (Currently at UC Berkeley) Diana Stralberg, PRBO Conservation Science Species Account Authors Completed Accounts Mountain Quail - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Greater Roadrunner - Pete Famolaro, Sweetwater Authority Water District. Coastal Cactus Wren - Laszlo Szijj and Chris Solek, Cal Poly Pomona. Wrentit - Geoff Geupel, Grant Ballard, and Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science. Gray Vireo - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Black-chinned Sparrow - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Costa's Hummingbird (coastal) - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Sage Sparrow - Barbara A. Carlson, UC-Riverside Reserve System, and Mary K. Chase. California Gnatcatcher - Patrick Mock, URS Consultants (San Diego). Accounts in Progress Rufous-crowned Sparrow - Scott Morrison, The Nature Conservancy (San Diego).
  • Relative Genetic Diversity of the Rare and Endangered Agave Shawii Ssp

    Relative Genetic Diversity of the Rare and Endangered Agave Shawii Ssp

    Received: 17 July 2020 | Revised: 9 December 2020 | Accepted: 14 December 2020 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7172 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Relative genetic diversity of the rare and endangered Agave shawii ssp. shawii and associated soil microbes within a southern California ecological preserve Jeanne P. Vu1 | Miguel F. Vasquez1 | Zuying Feng1 | Keith Lombardo2 | Sora Haagensen1,3 | Goran Bozinovic1,4 1Boz Life Science Research and Teaching Institute, San Diego, CA, USA Abstract 2Southern California Research Learning Shaw's Agave (Agave shawii ssp. shawii) is an endangered maritime succulent growing Center, National Park Services, San Diego, along the coast of California and northern Baja California. The population inhabiting CA, USA 3University of California San Diego Point Loma Peninsula has a complicated history of transplantation without documen- Extended Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA tation. The low effective population size in California prompted agave transplanting 4 Biological Sciences, University of California from the U.S. Naval Base site (NB) to Cabrillo National Monument (CNM). Since 2008, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA there are no agave sprouts identified on the CNM site, and concerns have been raised Correspondence about the genetic diversity of this population. We sequenced two barcoding loci, rbcL Goran Bozinovic, Boz Life Science Research and Teaching Institute, 3030 Bunker Hill St, and matK, of 27 individual plants from 5 geographically distinct populations, includ- San Diego CA 92109, USA. ing 12 individuals from California (NB and CNM). Phylogenetic analysis revealed the Emails: [email protected]; gbozinovic@ ucsd.edu three US and two Mexican agave populations are closely related and have similar ge- netic variation at the two barcoding regions, suggesting the Point Loma agave popu- Funding information National Park Services (NPS) Pacific West lation is not clonal.
  • 1968 General Plan

    1968 General Plan

    I I I I I I MONTEREY COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I MONTEREY COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I I I ADOPTED BY THE MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 10, 1968 I ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MONTEREY COUNTY OCTOBER 22, 1968 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 N I I I MONTEREY COUNTY I I I I I I PREFACE I The Monterey County General Plan is an attempt to establish a county philosophy based on the values and desires of the people. This in turn becomes a valid basis for decisions by public bodies as well as private enterprise. Such a pro­ cedure is vitally needed in our rapidly changing environment. The General Plan I is a study of the ever changing pattern of Monterey County --a mirror in which to review the past, to comprehend the present, and to contemplate the future, This plan reflects years of research and study as well as many other reports such as I the continuing Facts and Figures, Recreation in Monterey County, Beach Acqui­ sition, and other plans which are shown as separate documents h~cause of the volume of material. I The size of Monterey County, its variety of climate, vegetation, and land forms make it imperative that only large land uses or broad proposals be used to portray geographically the objectives desired for the future development of the County. I Accordingly, in addition to the maps, greater emphasis in the General Plan is placed on the text which conveys in words the objectives as well as the princi­ ples and standards recommended to make them effective.
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results

    2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results

    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
  • 4.0 Potential Coastal Receiver Areas

    4.0 Potential Coastal Receiver Areas

    4.0 POTENTIAL COASTAL RECEIVER AREAS The San Diego shoreline, including the beaches, bluffs, bays, and estuaries, is a significant environmental and recreational resource. It is an integral component of the area’s ecosystem and is interconnected with the nearshore ocean environment, coastal lagoons, wetland habitats, and upstream watersheds. The beaches are also a valuable economic resource and key part of the region’s positive image and overall quality of life. The shoreline consists primarily of narrow beaches backed by steep sea cliffs. In present times, the coastline is erosional except for localized and short-lived accretion due to historic nourishment activities. The beaches and cliffs have been eroding for thousands of years caused by ocean waves and rising sea levels which continue to aggravate this erosion. Episodic and site- specific coastal retreat, such as bluff collapse, is inevitable, although some coastal areas have remained stable for many years. In recent times, this erosion has been accelerated by urban development. The natural supply of sand to the region’s beaches has been significantly diminished by flood control structures, dams, siltation basins, removal of sand and gravel through mining operations, harbor construction, increased wave energy since the late 1970s, and the creation of impervious surfaces associated with urbanization and development. With more development, the region’s beaches will continue to lose more sand and suffer increased erosion, thereby reducing, and possibly eliminating their physical, resource and economic benefits. The State of the Coast Report, San Diego Region (USACE 1991) evaluated the natural and man- made coastal processes within the region. This document stated that during the next 50 years, the San Diego region “…is on a collision course.