DOCSLIB.ORG

Making a Stronger Case for Comparative Research to Investigate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Eastern Illinois University The Keep Faculty Research and Creative Activity Psychology 10-2013 Making a stronger case for comparative research to investigate the behavioral and neurological bases of three-dimensional navigation Daniele Nardi Eastern Illinois University, [email protected] Verner P. Bingman Bowling Green State University - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/psych_fac Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Nardi, Daniele and Bingman, Verner P., "Making a stronger case for comparative research to investigate the behavioral and neurological bases of three-dimensional navigation" (2013). Faculty Research and Creative Activity. 16. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/psych_fac/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research and Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2013) 36, 523–587 doi:10.1017/S0140525X12002476 Navigating in a three-dimensional world Kathryn J. Jeffery Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/jefferylab/ Aleksandar Jovalekic1 Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland [email protected] Madeleine Verriotis1 Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom [email protected] Robin Hayman Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Alexandra House, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract: The study of spatial cognition has provided considerable insight into how animals (including humans) navigate on the horizontal plane. However, the real world is three-dimensional, having a complex topography including both horizontal and vertical features, which presents additional challenges for representation and navigation. The present article reviews the emerging behavioral and neurobiological literature on spatial cognition in non-horizontal environments. We suggest that three-dimensional spaces are represented in a quasi- planar fashion, with space in the plane of locomotion being computed separately and represented differently from space in the orthogonal axis – a representational structure we have termed “bicoded.” We argue that the mammalian spatial representation in surface-travelling animals comprises a mosaic of these locally planar fragments, rather than a fully integrated volumetric map. More generally, this may be true even for species that can move freely in all three dimensions, such as birds and fish. We outline the evidence supporting this view, together with the adaptive advantages of such a scheme. Keywords: ethology; grid cells; head direction cells; hippocampus; navigation; neural encoding; place cells; spatial cognition; three- dimensional 1. Introduction volumetric space is computationally complicated, because of the increased size of the representation needed, and Behavioural and neurobiological studies of spatial cognition because rotations in three dimensions interact. It remains have provided considerable insight into how animals an open question how the brain has solved these problems, (including humans) navigate through the world, establish- and whether the same principles of spatial encoding ing that a variety of strategies, subserved by different operate in all three dimensions or whether the vertical neural systems, can be used in order to plan and execute dimension is treated differently. trajectories through large-scale, navigable space. This Studies of how animals and humans navigate in environ- work, which has mostly been done in simplified, labora- ments with a vertical component are slowly proliferating, tory-based environments, has defined a number of sub-pro- and it is timely to review the gathering evidence and cesses such as landmark recognition, heading offer a theoretical interpretation of the findings to date. determination, odometry (distance-measuring), and In the first part of the article, we review the current context recognition, all of which interact in the construction literature on animal and human orientation and locomotion and use of spatial representations. The neural circuitry in three-dimensional spaces, highlighting key factors that underlying these processes has in many cases been ident- contribute to and influence navigation in such spaces. ified, and it now appears that the basics of navigation are The second part summarizes neurobiological studies of reasonably well understood. the encoding of three-dimensional space. The third and The real world, however, is neither simple nor two- final part integrates the experimental evidence to put dimensional, and the addition of vertical space to the two forward a hypothesis concerning three-dimensional horizontal dimensions adds a number of new problems spatial encoding – the bicoded model – in which we for a navigator to solve. For one thing, moving against propose that in encoding 3D spaces, the mammalian gravity imposes additional energy costs. Also, moving in a brain constructs mosaics of connected surface-referenced © Cambridge University Press 2013 0140-525X/13 $40.00 523 Jeffery et al.: Navigating in a three-dimensional world maps. The advantages and limitations of such a quasi-planar therefore, concerns what the reference frame might be encoding scheme are explored. and how the coordinate system encodes distances and directions within the frame. 2. Theoretical considerations The majority of studies of navigation, at least within neu- robiology, have up until now taken place in laboratory set- Before reviewing the behavioural and neurobiological aspects tings, using restricted environments such as mazes, which of three-dimensional navigation it is useful to establish a are characterized both by being planar (i.e., two-dimen- theoretical framework for the discussion, which will be devel- sional) and by being horizontal. The real world differs in – oped in more detail in the last part of this article. The study of both of these respects. First, it is often not planar air and navigation needs to be distinguished from the study of spatial water, for example, allow movement in any direction and perception per se, in which a subject may or may not be so are volumetric. In this article, therefore, we will divide moving through the space. Additionally, it is also important three-dimensional environments into those that are locally to distinguish between space that is encoded egocentrically planar surfaces, which allow movement only in a direction (i.e., relative to the subject) versus space that is encoded allo- tangential to the surface, and those that are volumetric centrically (independently of the subject – i.e., relative to the spaces (air, water, space, and virtual reality), in which move- world). The focus of the present article is on the allocentric ment (or virtual movement) in any direction is uncon- encoding of the space that is being moved through, which strained. Second, even if real environments might be probably relies on different (albeit interconnected) neural (locally) planar, the planes may not necessarily be horizontal. systems from the encoding of egocentric space. These factors are important in thinking about how subjects An animal that is trying to navigate in 3D space needs to encode and navigate through complex spaces. know three things – how it is positioned, how it is oriented, What does the vertical dimension add to the problem of fi and in what direction it is moving. Further, all these things navigation? At rst glance, not much: The vertical dimen- require a reference frame: a world-anchored space-defin- sion provides a set of directions one can move in, like any ing framework with respect to which position, orientation, other dimension, and it could be that the principles that and movement can be specified. There also needs to be have been elucidated for navigation in two dimensions some kind of metric coordinate system – that is, a signal extend straightforwardly to three. In fact, however, the ver- that specifies distances and directions with respect to this tical dimension makes the problem of navigation consider- reference frame. The core question for animal navigation, ably more complex, for a number of reasons. First, the space to be represented is much larger, since a volume is larger than a plane by a power of 3/2. Second, the direc- tional information to be encoded is more complex, because there are three planes of orientation instead of just one. Furthermore, rotations in orthogonal planes KATHRYN (KATE)JEFFERY is Professor of Behavioural interact such that sequences of rotations have different out- Neuroscience at University College London (UCL), comes depending on the order in which they are executed United Kingdom. After graduating in 1985 in medicine (i.e., they are non-commutative), which adds to processing from the University of Otago, New Zealand, she complexity. Third, the vertical dimension is characterized embarked on a research career to study neural rep- by gravity, and by consequences of gravity such as hydro- resentation, training with Cliff Abraham (University of static or atmospheric pressure, which add both information Otago), Richard Morris (University of Edinburgh), and and effort to the computations involved. And finally, there John O’Keefe
Recommended publications
  • Laureadas Com O Nobel Na Fisiologia Ou Medicina (1995-2015)

    Laureadas Com O Nobel Na Fisiologia Ou Medicina (1995-2015)

    No trono da ciência II: laureadas com o Nobel na Fisiologia ou Medicina (1995-2015) On the Throne of Science II: Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine (1995-2015) LUZINETE SIMÕES MINELLA Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina | UFSC RESUMO O artigo dá continuidade a uma pesquisa mais ampla sobre as trajetórias das doze cientistas que receberam o Nobel na Fisiologia ou Medicina entre 1947 e 2015. Na fase anterior foram analisadas as trajetó- rias das cinco pioneiras, laureadas entre 1947 e 1988 e nesta segunda etapa, são abordadas suas sucessoras, as sete premiadas entre 1995 e 2015. A análise das suas autobiografias, discursos e palestras disponíveis no site do prêmio, além de outras fontes, se fundamenta numa perspectiva balizada pela crítica feminista à ciência bem como pelos avanços dos estudos do campo de gênero e ciências e da história da ciência. O artigo tenta identificar semelhanças e diferenças entre as pioneiras e as sucessoras na tentativa de contribuir para o debate sobre as especificidades da feminização das carreiras científicas. 85 Palavras-chave Gênero e Ciências – Nobel – Fisiologia ou Medicina. ABSTRACT The article gives continuity to a broader research on the trajectories of the twelve scientists who received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine between 1947 and 2015. In the previous phase, the trajectories of the five pioneers awarded between 1947 and 1988 were analyzed, and, in this second phase, their successors, the seven awarded between 1995 and 2015, were approached. The analysis of their autobiographies, speeches and lectures available on the award site, in addition to other sources, is based on a feminist critique of science as well as advances of the studies in the field of gender and science and the history of science.
  • Spatial View Cells in the Primate Hippocampus

    Spatial View Cells in the Primate Hippocampus

    European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 9, pp. 1789-1794, 1997 @ European Neuroscience Association SHORT COMMUNICATION Spatial View Cells in the Primate Hippocampus Edmund T. Rolls, Robert G. Robertson and Pierre Georges-FranGois Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK Keywords: hippocampus, memory, place, space, view, Abstract Hippocampal function was analysed by making recordings in rhesus monkeys actively walking in the laboratory. In a sample of 352 cells recorded in the hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex, a population of ‘spatial view’ cells was found to respond when the monkey looked at a part of the environment. The responses of these hippocampal neurons (i) occur to a view of space ‘out there’, not to the place where the monkey is, (ii) depend on where the monkey is looking, as shown by measuring eye position, (iii) do not encode head direction, and (iv) provide a spatial representation that is allocentric, i.e. in world coordinates. This representation of space ‘out there’ would be an appropriate part of a primate memory system involved in memories of where in an environment an object was seen, and more generally in the memory of particular events or episodes, for which a spatial component normally provides part of the context. Damage to the temporal lobe that includes the hippocampal formation implicated, for example a memory of where in space an object has or to one of its main connection pathways, the fornix, produces been seen, which can be remembered perfectly even when the human amnesia (Scoville and Milner, 1957; Gaffan and Gaffan, 1991; Squire or animal has never been to that particular position in space.
  • Attractor Cortical Neurodynamics, Schizophrenia, and Depression Edmund T

    Attractor Cortical Neurodynamics, Schizophrenia, and Depression Edmund T

    Rolls Translational Psychiatry (2021) 11:215 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01333-7 Translational Psychiatry REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Attractor cortical neurodynamics, schizophrenia, and depression Edmund T. Rolls 1,2 Abstract The local recurrent collateral connections between cortical neurons provide a basis for attractor neural networks for memory, attention, decision-making, and thereby for many aspects of human behavior. In schizophrenia, a reduction of the firing rates of cortical neurons, caused for example by reduced NMDA receptor function or reduced spines on neurons, can lead to instability of the high firing rate attractor states that normally implement short-term memory and attention in the prefrontal cortex, contributing to the cognitive symptoms. Reduced NMDA receptor function in the orbitofrontal cortex by reducing firing rates may produce negative symptoms, by reducing reward, motivation, and emotion. Reduced functional connectivity between some brain regions increases the temporal variability of the functional connectivity, contributing to the reduced stability and more loosely associative thoughts. Further, the forward projections have decreased functional connectivity relative to the back projections in schizophrenia, and this may reduce the effects of external bottom-up inputs from the world relative to internal top-down thought processes. Reduced cortical inhibition, caused by a reduction of GABA neurotransmission, can lead to instability of the spontaneous firing states of cortical networks, leading to a noise-induced jump to a high firing rate attractor state even in the absence of external inputs, contributing to the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. In depression, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex non-reward attractor network system is over-connected and has increased sensitivity to non- reward, providing a new approach to understanding depression.
  • Memory System Neurons Represent Gaze Position and The

    Memory System Neurons Represent Gaze Position and The

    EXN0010.1177/1179069518787484Journal of Experimental NeuroscienceMeister 787484research-article2018 Journal of Experimental Neuroscience Memory System Neurons Represent Gaze Volume 12: 1–4 © The Author(s) 2018 Position and the Visual World Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Miriam Meister1,2,3 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069518787484 10.1177/1179069518787484 1Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 2Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. ABSTRACT: The entorhinal cortex, a brain area critical for memory, contains neurons that fire when a rodent is in a certain location (eg, grid cells), or when a monkey looks at certain locations. In rodents, these spatial representations align to visual objects in the environment by firing when the animal is in a preferred location defined by relative position of visual environmental features. Recently, our laboratory found that simultaneously recorded entorhinal neurons in monkeys can exhibit different spatial reference frames for gaze position, including a reference frame of visual environmental features. We also discovered that most of the neurons represent gaze position. These results suggest that gaze information in multiple spatial reference frames is a potent signal used in the primate memory system. Here, I describe how these findings support three underappreciated views of the hippocampal memory system. KEYWORDS: Entorhinal cortex, memory, medial temporal lobe, eye movement, reference frame, hippocampus, primate, gaze RECEIVED: June 8, 2018. ACCEPTED: June 15, 2018. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Miriam Meister, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Email: [email protected] TYPE: Commentary COmmENT ON: Meister MLR, Buffalo EA.
  • Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat Than Artifical Intelligence

    Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat Than Artifical Intelligence

    Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intelligence? IBM’s Jeopardy winning computer Watson is a serious threat, not just to the livelihood of medical diagnosticians, but to other professionals who may find themselves going the way of welders. Besides its economic threat, the advance of AI seems to pose a cultural threat: if physical systems can do what we do without thought to give meaning to their achievements, the conscious human mind will be displaced from its unique role in the universe as a creative, responsible, rational agent. But this worry has a more powerful basis in the Nobel Prize winning discoveries of a quartet of neuroscientists—Eric Kandel, John O’Keefe, Edvard, and May-Britt Moser. For between them they have shown that the human brain doesn’t work the way conscious experience suggests at all. Instead it operates to deliver human achievements in the way IBM’s Watson does. Thoughts with meaning have no more role in the human brain than in artificial intelligence. Consciousness tells us that we employ a theory of mind, both to decide on our own actions and to predict and explain the behavior of others. According to this theory there have to be particular belief/desire pairings somewhere in our brains working together to bring about movements of the body, including speech and writing. Which beliefs and desires in particular? Roughly speaking it’s the contents of beliefs and desires—what they are about—that pair them up to drive our actions. The desires represent the ends, the beliefs record the available means to attain them.
  • The 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology Or Medicine John O´Keefe May-Britt

    The 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology Or Medicine John O´Keefe May-Britt

    PRESS RELEASE 2014‐10‐06 The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet has today decided to award The 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with one half to John O´Keefe and the other half jointly to May‐Britt Moser and Edvard I. Moser for their discoveries of cells that constitute a positioning system in the brain ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ How do we know where we are? How can we find the way from one place to another? And how can we store this information in such a way that we can immediately find the way the next time we trace the same path? This year´s Nobel Laureates have discovered a positioning system, an “inner GPS” in the brain that makes it possible to orient ourselves in space, demonstrating a cellular basis for higher cognitive function. In 1971, John O´Keefe discovered the first component of this positioning system. He found that a type of nerve cell in an area of the brain called the hippocampus that was always activated when a rat was at a certain place in a room. Other nerve cells were activated when the rat was at other places. O´Keefe concluded that these “place cells” formed a map of the room. More than three decades later, in 2005, May‐Britt and Edvard Moser discovered another key component of the brain’s positioning system. They identified another type of nerve cell, which they called “grid cells”, that generate a coordinate system and allow for precise positioning and pathfinding. Their subsequent research showed how place and grid cells make it possible to determine position and to navigate.
  • ERC Press Release O in 2012, Prof

    ERC Press Release O in 2012, Prof

    Press release 6 October 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine to two European Research Council grantees It was announced today by the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, that the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine has been awarded to Professor Edvard I. Moser and Professor May-Britt Moser, both ERC Advanced Grant holders, together with Professor John O´Keefe, "for their discoveries of cells that constitute a positioning system in the brain". On this occasion, European Commission President José Manuel Barroso said: "I warmly congratulate John O´Keefe, May-Britt Moser and Edvard Moser on their achievement. I am particularly proud that both May-Britt and Edvard Moser are holders of European Research Council Advanced Grants. The ERC supports the very best pioneering researchers across Europe, and has made a real impact since its launch in 2007. This is why we decided on a significant boost for the ERC budget in our new research and innovation programme, Horizon 2020." The President of the European Research Council (ERC), Prof. Jean-Pierre-Bourguignon, commented: "On behalf of the ERC, I would like to extend warm congratulations to this year’s three Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine. We are very proud that the European Research Council has funded two of the winners - Professors Edvard I. Moser and May-Britt Moser. Their ERC Advanced Grants contributed in a significant way to their ground-breaking research on the navigation system of the brain. Today's news confirms that the ERC invests in the best minds – whether young or senior - to support their most innovative ideas at the cutting edge." This is the third time that a Nobel Prize goes to top researchers funded by the ERC since its launch.
  • Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study

    Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study

    Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study A Research and Educational Collaboration between Norway and the University of California, Berkeley sathercenter.berkeley.edu Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study Background and Purpose The primary mission of the Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study is to strengthen ongoing research collaborations and foster the develop- ment of new collaborations between the University of California, Berkeley and the consortium of nine participating Norwegian academic institutions. The Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study’s funding enables UC Berkeley faculty to conduct exploratory and cutting edge research in tandem with leading researchers from the following nine Norwegian higher education institutions and the Research Council of Norway: Peder Sather (1810-1886) Peder Sather, a farmer’s son from Norway, BI Norwegian Business School (BI) emigrated to New York City in 1832. Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) There he started up as a servant and lottery ticket seller before opening an exchange Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) brokerage, later to become a full-fledged University of Agder (UiA) banking house. When gold was discovered in California, banker Francis Drexel University of Bergen (UiB) offered Peder Sather and his companion, Edward Church, a large loan to establish a Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) bank in San Francisco. From 1863 Peder University of Oslo (UiO) Sather went on as the sole owner of the bank and in the late 1860’s he had become University of Stavanger (UiS) one of California’s richest men. UiT The Arctic University of Norway Peder Sather was a public-spirited man, a philanthropist and an eager supporter of The Peder Sather Center selects projects for support and serves as the public education on all levels and for both sexes.
  • May-Britt Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway

    May-Britt Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway

    Grid Cells, Place Cells and Memory Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2014 by May-Britt Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. n 7 December 2014 I gave the most prestigious lecture I have given in O my life—the Nobel Prize Lecture in Medicine or Physiology. Afer lectures by my former mentor John O’Keefe and my close colleague of more than 30 years, Edvard Moser, the audience was still completely engaged, wonderful and responsive. I was so excited to walk out on the stage, and proud to present new and exciting data from our lab. Te title of my talk was: “Grid cells, place cells and memory.” Te long-term vision of my lab is to understand how higher cognitive func- tions are generated by neural activity. At frst glance, this seems like an over- ambitious goal. President Barack Obama expressed our current lack of knowl- edge about the workings of the brain when he announced the Brain Initiative last year. He said: “As humans, we can identify galaxies light years away; we can study particles smaller than an atom. But we still haven’t unlocked the mystery of the three pounds of matter that sits between our ears.” Will these mysteries remain secrets forever, or can we unlock them? What did Obama say when he was elected President? “Yes, we can!” To illustrate that the impossible is possible, I started my lecture by showing a movie with a cute mouse that struggled to bring a biscuit over an edge and home to its nest. Te biscuit was almost bigger than the mouse itself.
  • FY2006 Society for Neuroscience Annual Report

    FY2006 Society for Neuroscience Annual Report

    Navigating A Changing Landscape FY2006 Annual Report 2005–2006 Society for 2005–2006 Society Past Presidents Neuroscience Council for Neuroscience Committee Chairs Carol A. Barnes, PhD, 2004–05 OFFICERS Anne B. Young, MD, PhD, 2003–04 Stephen F. Heinemann, PhD Darwin K. Berg, PhD Huda Akil, PhD, 2002–03 President Audit Committee Fred H. Gage, PhD, 2001–02 David Van Essen, PhD John H. Morrison, PhD Donald L. Price, MD, 2000–01 President-Elect Committee on Animals in Research Dennis W. Choi, MD, PhD, 1999–00 Carol A. Barnes, PhD Irwin B. Levitan, PhD Edward G. Jones, MD, DPhil, 1998–99 Past President Committee on Committees Lorne M. Mendell, PhD, 1997–98 Bruce S. McEwen, PhD, 1996–97 Michael E. Goldberg, MD William J. Martin, PhD Treasurer Committee on Diversity in Neuroscience Pasko Rakic, MD, PhD, 1995–96 Carla J. Shatz, PhD, 1994–95 Christine M. Gall, PhD Rita J. Balice-Gordon, PhD Larry R. Squire, PhD, 1993–94 Treasurer-Elect Judy Illes, PhD (Co-chairs) Committee on Women in Neuroscience Ira B. Black, MD, 1992–93 William T. Greenough, PhD Joseph T. Coyle, MD, 1991–92 Past Treasurer Michael E. Goldberg, MD Robert H. Wurtz, PhD, 1990–91 Finance Committee Irwin B. Levitan, PhD Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic, PhD, 1989–90 Secretary Mahlon R. DeLong, MD David H. Hubel, MD, 1988–89 Government and Public Affairs Committee Albert J. Aguayo, MD, 1987–88 COUNCILORS Darwin K. Berg, PhD Laurence Abbott, PhD Mortimer Mishkin, PhD, 1986–87 Information Technology Committee Bernice Grafstein, PhD, 1985–86 Joanne E. Berger-Sweeney, PhD William D.
  • Reward–Spatial View Representations and Learning in the Primate Hippocampus

    Reward–Spatial View Representations and Learning in the Primate Hippocampus

    The Journal of Neuroscience, June 29, 2005 • 25(26):6167–6174 • 6167 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Reward–Spatial View Representations and Learning in the Primate Hippocampus Edmund T. Rolls and Jian-Zhong Xiang Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom The primate anterior hippocampus (which corresponds to the rodent ventral hippocampus) receives inputs from brain regions involved in reward processing, such as the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. To investigate how this affective input may be incorporated into primate hippocampal function, we recorded neuronal activity while rhesus macaques performed a reward–place association task in which each spatial scene shown on a video monitor had one location that, if touched, yielded a preferred fruit juice reward and a second location that yielded a less-preferred juice reward. Each scene had different locations for the different rewards. Of 312 neurons analyzed in the hippocampus, 18% responded more to the location of the preferred reward in different scenes, and 5% responded to the location of theless-preferredreward.Whenthelocationsofthepreferredrewardsinthesceneswerereversed,60%of44hippocampalneuronstested reversedthelocationtowhichtheyresponded,showingthatthereward–placeassociationscouldbealteredbynewlearninginafewtrials. The majority (82%) of these 44 hippocampal neurons tested did not respond to reward associations in a visual discrimination, object– reward association task. Thus, the primate hippocampus contains a representation of
  • Commentary on the Nobel Prize That Has Been Granted in Medicine-Physiology, Chemistry and Physics to Noteable Female Scientists

    Commentary on the Nobel Prize That Has Been Granted in Medicine-Physiology, Chemistry and Physics to Noteable Female Scientists

    Gaceta Médica de México. 2015;151 Contents available at PubMed www.anmm.org.mx PERMANYER Gac Med Mex. 2015;151:264-8 www.permanyer.com GACETA MÉDICA DE MÉXICO HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICINE Commentary on the Nobel Prize that has been granted in Medicine-Physiology, Chemistry and Physics to noteable female scientists Arturo Zárate*, Leticia Manuel Apolinar, Renata Saucedo and Lourdes Basurto © Permanyer Publications 2015 .rehsilbup eht fo noissimrep nettirw roirp eht tuohtiw gniypocotohp ro decudorper eb yam noitacilbup siht fo trap oN trap fo siht noitacilbup yam eb decudorper ro Endocrinology, Diabetesgniypocotohp and Metabolism Researchtuohtiw eht Unit, Centro Médicoroirp Nacional, Institutonettirw Mexicano del Seguronoissimrep Social (IMSS),fo México,eht D.F., México .rehsilbup Abstract The Nobel Prize was established by Alfred Nobel in 1901 to award people who have made outstanding achievements in physics, chemistry and medicine. So far, from 852 laureates, 45 have been female. Marie Curie was the first woman to receive the Nobel Prize in 1903 for physics and eight years later also for chemistry. It is remarkable that her daughter Irene and her husband also received the Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1935. Other two married couples, Cori and Moser, have also been awarded the Nobel Prize. The present commentary attempts to show the female participation in the progress of scientific activities. (Gac Med Mex. 2015;151:264-8) Corresponding author: Arturo Zárate, [email protected] KEY WORDS: Nobel Prize. Nobel Prize winning women. Female scientists. to be awarded every year. Since 1901, this prize has ntroduction I been awarded in the areas of physics, chemistry, phys- iology and medicine to 852 persons, out of which 45 In the year of 2014, the Medicine Nobel Prize was have been women1.