DOCSLIB.ORG

The Marshall Plan for Rebuilding Western Europe 1 1 Marshall Realized That Only the United States Was Economically Able to Provide Aid to Greece

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Marshall Plan for Rebuilding Western Europe 1 1 Marshall Realized That Only the United States Was Economically Able to Provide Aid to Greece The Marshall Plan for Rebuilding Western Europe Pedestrians walk past bomb-damaged buildings in London, England. (National Archives) The Marshall Plan was a series of economic state—George C. Marshall. Marshall was a career strategies and reforms that helped to military officer and had headed the Army during strengthen Western Europe after World War II. World War II. As the leader of the Army, Marshall It also helped to make the United States the had earned the admiration of the American public. leader of the free world. Soon after Marshall took office, a crisis arose over R HDuring World War II, the United States and the Greece. Greece had been occupied by Nazis during Soviet Union fought together as allies against Nazi the war. Two resistance groups had fought the Germany. When the war ended, Soviet troops Nazis. One supported the Greek monarchy. The other occupied much of Eastern and Central Europe. was communist. After liberation from the Nazis, the Communist governments, allied with the Soviet communists refused to join a new government and Union, soon controlled this area and set up police R ebelled against the monarchy. British troops put down the rebellion. In 1946, a new rebellion states. In 1946, Winston Churchill, who had served erupted. In February 1947, t h e British announced as British prime minister during the war, famously that they could no longer afford to give military and warned that an “iron curtain” divided Western and financial support to Greece. Eastern Europe and that communism threatened to spread throughout war-ravaged Europe. Based on what had happened in Eastern Europe, many in the U.S. government suspected that the The wartime alliance between the Soviet Union and Soviet Union was funding the communist rebels. the United States was ending. A new period of (Most historians have since concluded that the conflict between the two powers—known as the Cold Soviet Union, weakened by the war, gave little War—was beginning. In January 1947, President support to the rebels.) Harry S. Truman appointed a new secretary of © Constitutional Rights Foundation (www.crf-usa.org) | The Marshall Plan for Rebuilding Western Europe 1 1 Marshall realized that only the United States was economically able to provide aid to Greece. The war had devastated the economies of other nations. At a key meeting in the White House, President Truman, Secretary of State Marshall, congressional leaders, and a few others debated what the United States should do about Greece. Marshall’s assistant Dean Acheson warned that this crisis was just the beginning. If the communists were not stopped, he said, Soviet domination might extend “to Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.” On March 12, 1947, President Truman addressed Congress and asked for $400 million in economic President Truman (right) shakes hand with George C. Marshall shortly aid for Greece and its neighbor Turkey. He after Marshall is sworn in as U.S. secretary of state. (National announced what came to known as the Truman Archives) Doctrine: “I believe that it must be the policy of the • Factories, railroads, bridges, electric power United States to support free peoples who are resisting plants, and water systems were damaged or attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by destroyed. outside pressure.” Truman had in mind mainly • Farmers suffered from drought and when they economic aid to eliminate “misery and want” that brought their products to market, city dwellers often became the “seeds of totalitarian regimes.” could not afford them. Some criticized this new doctrine as too aggressive and • Trade and the flow of capital needed to likely to lead the United States into a costly “reckless finance reconstruction were interrupted. adventure.” Within two months, however, the fear of a communist power grab in Greece prompted Congress to Kennan recommended that the United States help approve Truman’s request for aid. rebuild “the economic health and vigor of The Idea of the Marshall Plan European society.” He saw this not just as humanitarian aid, but as the best way to fight In 1946, George F. Kennan, a State Department communism in Europe. He believed that the Russian specialist, wrote a long telegram from European nations receiving U.S. aid needed to Moscow analyzing Soviet intentions in Europe. operate as an economic unit, much like the 13 The following year, Foreign Affairs magazine colonies did after the American Revolution. published the telegram as an article by “X.” The Eventually, he argued, a rebuilt Europe would article caused a stir and was widely discussed. benefit the United States by once again being Kennan concluded that the Soviets, surrounded by able to buy American factory and farm products. capitalist countries, were insecure and wanted to More importantly, an economically strong Europe expand their power. Kennan called for a “long-term, would stop the spread of communism. patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.” Only a few weeks after President Truman requested aid for Greece and Turkey, Kennan and other top advisors Secretary of State Marshall appointed Kennan to to Secretary of State Marshall convinced him of the need head a planning group to assess whether European for a massive aid program for all of Europe. nations could resist Soviet expansion. Kennan quickly reported that the war had left Europe in terrible On June 5, 1947, Secretary of State Marshall made economic shape. He reported on the grim realities in an innovative proposal in a speech at Harvard Europe: University. Noting the disastrous conditions in • Many survivors of the war were homeless, Europe, Marshall called for a “joint effort” by the hungry, and unemployed. European nations to plan the rebuilding of Europe. • Inflation robbed the wages of those who were The United States would provide “friendly aid” in employed. drafting the plan, but this was really “the business of the Europeans.” © Constitutional Rights Foundation (www.crf-usa.org) | The Marshall Plan for Rebuilding Western Europe 2 2 Marshall promised that once the plan was in place, up with the main Marshall Plan funding request of the United States would provide the necessary $17 billion over four years. funds to make it work. “Our policy,” Marshall The Republican Party had been out of power during made clear, “is directed not against any country or the Great Depression and war years. But it gained doctrine but against hunger, poverty, desperation, control of Congress in the 1946 election on a platform and chaos.” of reducing government spending and returning to Making the Marshall Plan an isolationist foreign policy. Congress and the Marshall even invited the Soviets to participate. president were completely at odds. But Marshall But Kennan predicted that the Soviet Union and commanded great respect, and Truman put Marshall’s name on the proposal. Eastern European countries under its control would refuse to join. He believed that Stalin, the The Truman Administration assembled many experts Soviet dictator, would never go along with an to present arguments for funding the Marshall Plan. American-inspired plan that required the free They pointed out that the Marshall Plan would do many exchange of economic information. necessary things—from providing humanitarian help for war-torn Europe to preventing another economic depression As predicted, the Soviets refused Marshall’s in the United States by making Europe a market for invitation to help develop a plan to rebuild Europe. American products. They charged that his plan was a scheme to dominate Europe economically. Under Soviet But the most powerful argument for Congress and control, the Eastern European nations also declined the American public was that the Marshall Plan to participate. would contain the spread of communism. In February 1948, at the peak of the debate on the Marshall Plan, In July 1947, 16 Western European nations met in communists overthrew the government of Paris to put together an economic recovery plan. Czechoslovakia. Shortly afterward, President Truman But the Americans soon became disappointed spoke to Congress. “There are times in world history,” he about the direction of the planning. Rather than said, “when it is far wiser to act than to hesitate.” a unified plan for Europe as a whole, each country was developing its own “shopping list.” Congress moved quickly to approve emergency aid In addition, the French argued that western to France, Italy, and Austria. The lawmakers then Germany, occupied by Britain, France, and the passed the Economic Cooperation Act of 1948, United States, should remain economically weak which funded the Marshall Plan at a slightly and not receive much Marshall Plan aid. The lower level than Truman had requested. During the French believed this would prevent Germany next four years, the United States provided over from ever again going to war. $13 billion in aid to 16 Western European nations, including West Germany. (That is more than $100 Marshall insisted that the plan must establish an billion in today’s dollars.) independent economy, a reasonable standard of living, and the elimination of trade barriers for the whole of The Marshall Plan in Action Western Europe. Marshall expected all this to occur The basic purpose of the Marshall Plan, according within four years. He also stressed the importance of to the Economic Cooperation Act, was to ensure full German participation. He saw it as necessary for “individual liberty, free institutions, and genuine the economic recovery of Western Europe. independence” by restoring “sound economic conditions.” Between 1948 and 1951, the Marshall With this push from Marshall, the Europeans Plan attempted to implement several economic compromised and submitted a plan to the United strategies and reforms to rebuild Western Europe. It States in September 1947. The Europeans said they aimed to: needed $19 billion to carry out the Marshall Plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marshall Plan & Berlin Airlift
    Objectives: 1. Explain how the Marshall Plan, the Berlin airlift, and the creation of NATO helped achieve American goals in postwar Europe. 2. Assess the impact of two Communist advances on American foreign policy. 3. Summarize the effects of the cold war on American life. Main Idea: As the cold war intensified, American policy focused on rebuilding and unifying Western Europe. At home, emotionally charged spy cases raised fears of Communist infiltration into American society and government. Marshall Plan & Berlin Airlift • Secretary of State George C. Marshall created an economic plan to rebuild Europe after World War II. The Soviet Union and their Eastern European allies refused to take part in the Marshall Plan, but 16 European countries did accept economic aid from the U.S. ($13 billion over 4 years). • In 1948, to keep people from fleeing communism, Stalin blockaded Berlin. To avoid a war, the U.S. and Britain airlifted supplies to Berlin for 15 months called the Berlin Airlift. 1948 Berlin Airlift NATO & Warsaw Pact In 1949, NATO created a military alliance between 10 Western European countries, the U.S., and Canada. The countries viewed an attack against one country, as an attack against them all. In 1949, China becomes communist and Soviets create their atomic bomb, causing the U.S. to drastically increase peacetime defense spending to enforce Containment. In the 1950s, President Eisenhower will continue with Containment, even though his Secretary of State John Dulles wanted to end communism. The U.S. did not interfere in situations involving Soviet Satellite Nations. President Eisenhower did not want the Cold War to become an actual war.
    [Show full text]
  • Truman Doctrine / Marshall Plan, Comecon & Cominform
    Cold War Aim: To understand how USA used financial develops… aid to fight Communism in post-war Europe (Marshall Plan) Imagine you were reading this at the breakfast table, have a conversation with your neighbour, what might have been said? How does this headline make you feel? What is it trying to say? Key terms: Before WW2 After WW2 Isolationism: Containment: US policy before WW2 was US policy after WW2 was Isolationism, basically staying Containment (limiting the out of other countries affairs, spread of something), basically especially Europe’s as it is “so stopping the spread of far away” anyway! Communism outside a small number of countries What was the impact of the Truman Doctrine? Kennan’s ’Long Telegram’ confirmed Truman’s worst fears Stalin intended to spread Communism across Europe Truman’s military advisors told Truman the Soviets weren't strong enough to fight the USA. Truman said they didn't need to fight to increase their territories and power. What would you do if you were Truman at this stage? What can you see here, and why might this help Stalin out? Post war damage in Europe • Many European countries were in ruins • Homes, factories, infrastructure (roads, railways) • Poverty increases with anger and desperation Communism is actually quite attractive right now, the wealth of the rich will be redistributed (shared) to help us all, not just the few at the top! I see what Stalin is offering us! So, you see, Stalin doesn't need to go to war, he has a perfect scenario, the people are already discontented, he When you put
    [Show full text]
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I
    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Expansion: Benefits and Consequences
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2001 NATO expansion: Benefits and consequences Jeffrey William Christiansen The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Christiansen, Jeffrey William, "NATO expansion: Benefits and consequences" (2001). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8802. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8802 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ■rr - Maween and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of M ontana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission X No, I do not grant permission ________ Author's Signature; Date:__ ^ ^ 0 / Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. MSThe»i9\M«r«f»eld Library Permission Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NATO EXPANSION: BENEFITS AND CONSEQUENCES by Jeffrey William Christiansen B.A. University of Montana, 2000 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The University of Montana 2001 Approved by: hairpers Dean, Graduate School 7 - 24- 0 ^ Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean G. Acheson Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 4/27/1964 Administrative Information
    Dean G. Acheson Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 4/27/1964 Administrative Information Creator: Dean G(ooderham) Acheson Interviewer: Lucius D. Battle Date of Interview: April 27, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 34 pp. Biographical Note Acheson, Secretary of State under President Harry S. Truman, talks about foreign policy matters during the John F. Kennedy administration and his advice and activities during that time. He also reads the text of several letters he wrote to JFK. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed February 15, 1965, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff. Transcript of Oral History Interview These electronic documents were created from transcripts available in the research room of the John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Source Document with Questions (Dbqs) the POTSDAM DECLARATION (JULY 26, 1945) Introduction the Dropping of the Atomic Bo
    Primary Source Document with Questions (DBQs) THE POTSDAM DECLARATION (JULY 26, 1945) Introduction The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains among the most controversial events in modern history. Historians have actively debated whether the bombings were necessary, what effect they had on bringing the war in the Pacific to an expeditious end, and what other options were available to the United States. These very same questions were also contentious at the time, as American policymakers struggled with how to use a phenomenally powerful new technology and what the long-term impact of atomic weaponry might be, not just on the Japanese, but on domestic politics, America’s international relations, and the budding Cold War with the Soviet Union. In retrospect, it is clear that the reasons for dropping the atomic bombs on Japan, just like the later impact of nuclear technology on world politics, were complex and intertwined with a variety of issues that went far beyond the simple goal of bringing World War II to a rapid close. The Potsdam Declaration was issued on July 26, 1945 by U.S. President Harry Truman, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and President Chiang Kai-shek of the Republic of China, who were meeting in Potsdam, Germany to consider war strategy and post-war policy. Soviet leader Joseph Stalin also attended the Potsdam Conference but did not sign the Declaration, since the Soviet Union did not enter the war against Japan until August 8, 1945. Document Excerpts with Questions From Japan’s Decision to Surrender, by Robert J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marshall Plan and the Beginnings of Comecon
    THE MARSHALL PLAN AND THE BEGINNINGS OF COMECON Cristian BENȚE Abstract: The integration of the Eastern-European states into the Soviet Union’s sphere of influence at the end of the Second World War represented a complex process that aimed all the vital sectors in those states. In a relatively short period of time, the political, economic, social and cultural life of the Eastern-European states was radically transformed, according to the models imposed by Moscow. The Soviet Union imposed its control over Eastern Europe because it had strategic, political, military and economic interests in this region. The states in this region became, after the Soviet Union broke relations with its former Western allies, the main suppliers of resources for the recovery of the soviet economy. The soviet control over the Eastern-European economies took many forms: from the brutal transfer of raw materials, finite products and technology during the first years after the war, to more subtle methods, as the establishment of “mixed enterprises”, the initialization of bilateral agreements and finally by establishing the COMECON. The establishment of the COMECON in January 1949 was one of the measures taken by Moscow in order to counteract the effects of the Marshall Plan and to consolidate the Soviet influence in the satellite-states from Eastern Europe. This measure was preceded by other actions meant to strengthen Moscow’s political, economic and ideological control over these states. Keywords: Marshall Plan, COMECON, Cold War economic integration, Iron Curtain The launch of the Marshall Plan in the summer of 1947 and its rejection by the Soviet Union represents a turning point in the evolution of the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marshall Plan and the Cold War ______
    Background Essay: The Marshall Plan and the Cold War _____________________________________________ The Cold War was fought with words and threats rather than violent action. The two nations at war were the United States and the Soviet Union. Although the two superpowers had worked as allies to defeat Germany during World War II, tensions between them grew after the war. Feelings of mistrust and resentment began to form as early as the 1945 Potsdam Conference, where Harry S. Truman and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin met. Stalin was interested in expanding Russia’s power into Eastern Europe, and the U.S. feared that Russia was planning to take over the world and spread the political idea of Communism. Truman’s response to the Soviet Union’s sphere of influence and current conditions of war-torn Europe would become known as the Truman Doctrine. This doctrine proposed to give aid to countries that were suffering from the aftermath of World War II and threatened by Soviet oppression. The U.S. was especially concerned about Greece and Turkey. Due to the slow progress of Europe’s economic development following WWII, Truman devised another plan to offer aid called the Marshall Plan. The plan was named after Secretary of State George Marshall due to Truman’s respect for his military achievements. Truman hoped that by enacting the Marshall Plan two main goals would be accomplished. These goals were: 1.) It would lead to the recovery of production abroad, which was essential both to a vigorous democracy and to a peace founded on democracy and freedom, and which, in the eyes of the United States, the Soviet Union had thus far prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Usii.8A – Rebuilding
    U..S.. HISTORY: 1865 TO THE PRESENT STUDY GUIDE – POST-WWII CHANGES HISTORY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE STANDARDS OF LEARNING CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK –2015 STANDARDS Reformatted version created by SOLpass - www.SOLpass.org STANDARD USII..8A – REBUILDING EUROPE & JAPAN The student will demonstrate knowledge of the economic, social, and political transformation of the United States and the world between the end of World War II and the present by a) describing the rebuilding of Europe and Japan after World War II, the emergence of the United States as a superpower, and the establishment of the United Nations. The Allied victory in World War II led to the emergence of the United States and the Soviet Union as global superpowers. The United States’ involvement in World War II reshaped America’s role in world affairs. United States helps rebuild postwar Europe and Japan Much of Europe was in ruins following World War II. − East Germany remained under the domination of − Soviet forces occupied most of Eastern and Central the Soviet Union and did not adopt democratic Europe and the eastern portion of Germany. institutions. − The United States felt it was in its best interest to help • Following its defeat, Japan was occupied by American rebuild Europe and prevent political and economic forces. instability. − It soon adopted a democratic form of Rebuilding efforts government, resumed self-government, and • The United States instituted George C. Marshall’s plan to became a strong ally of the United States. rebuild Europe (the Marshall Plan), which provided Establishment of the United Nations massive financial aid to rebuild European economies and prevent the spread of communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Advisors in Vietnam: 1963
    Military Advisors in Vietnam: 1963 Topic: Vietnam Grade Level: 9-12 Subject Area: US History after World War II Time Required: 1 class period Goals/Rationale In the winter of 1963, the eyes of most Americans were not on Vietnam. However, Vietnam would soon become a battleground familiar to all Americans. In this lesson plan, students analyze a letter to President Kennedy from a woman who had just lost her brother in South Vietnam and consider Kennedy’s reply, explaining his rationale for sending US military personnel there. Essential Question: What were the origins of US involvement in Vietnam prior to its engagement of combat troops? Objectives Students will: analyze primary sources. discuss US involvement in the Vietnam conflict prior to 1963. evaluate the “domino theory” from the historical perspective of Americans living in 1963. Connections to Curriculum (Standards) National Standards: National Center for History in the Schools Era 9 - Postwar United States (1945 to early 1970s), 2B - The student understands United States foreign policy in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. Era 9, 2C - The student understands the foreign and domestic consequences of US involvement in Vietnam. Massachusetts Frameworks US II.20 – Explain the causes, course and consequences of the Vietnam War and summarize the diplomatic and military policies of Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. Prior Knowledge Students should have a working knowledge of the Cold War. They should be able to analyze primary sources. Prepared by the Department of Education and Public Programs, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum Historical Background and Context After World War II, the French tried to re-establish their colonial control over Vietnam, the most strategic of the three states comprising the former Indochina (Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos).
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering George Kennan Does Not Mean Idolizing Him
    UNITED STATES InsTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Melvyn P. Leffler This report originated while Melvyn P. Leffler was a Jennings Randolph Fellow at the United States Institute of Peace. He was writing his book on what appeared to be the most intractable and ominous conflict of the post–World War II era—the Cold War. He was addressing the questions of why the Cold War lasted as long as it did and why it ended when Remembering it did. As part of the ongoing dialogue at the United States Institute of Peace, he was repeatedly asked about the lessons of the Cold War for our contemporary problems. George Kennan His attention was drawn to the career of George F. Kennan, the father of containment. Kennan was a rather obscure and frustrated foreign service officer at the U.S. embassy in Lessons for Today? Moscow when his “Long Telegram” of February 1946 gained the attention of policymakers in Washington and transformed his career. Leffler reviews Kennan’s legacy and ponders the implications of his thinking for the contemporary era. Is it Summary possible, Leffler wonders, to reconcile Kennan’s legacy with the newfound emphasis on a “democratic peace”? • Kennan’s thinking and policy prescriptions evolved quickly from the time he wrote the Melvyn P. Leffler, a former senior fellow at the United States “Long Telegram” in February 1946 until the time he delivered the Walgreen Lectures Institute of Peace, won the Bancroft Prize for his book at the University of Chicago in 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK on the Containment of Communism, 1952 Introduction
    1 JFK on the containment of Communism, 1952 Introduction In August 1952, as he was campaigning for the US Senate, John F. Kennedy addressed the Massachusetts Chapter of the American Federation of Labor. This manuscript is a draft of the speech Kennedy delivered before the influential labor union. Kennedy focused on the expansion of Communism and the priority of containment. Kennedy referred to the Communist threat as “an enemy, power[full], unrelenting and implacable who seeks to dominate the world by subversion and conspiracy.” He asserted that “All problems are dwarfed by the necessity of the West to maintain against the Communists a balance of power.” He also pointed out that containment was necessary not only for United States military safety, but also because of the threat Communism posed in “political & economic” spheres. Excerpt But In our efforts to contain the tide of Communist expansion, it would be a mistake to judge the Communist threat as primarily military, although it is Russian military prestige that has force & gives persua persuasion to her [illegible] to the beliefs of its political & economic doctrines. [illegible] Certainly we must stand devote all our available energies to the task of rebuilding our military strength and we should use every means at our disposal to persuade our friends in the West to do likewise. Questions for Discussion Read the document introduction, the excerpt, and the transcript. Then apply your knowledge of American history in order to answer the questions that follow. 1. Explain the terms “containment” and “balance of power.” 2. Connect the content of this speech to events at the time of its presentation, August 1952.
    [Show full text]