Palaeontology of Northeastern Australian Caves Gilbert J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Palaeontology of Northeastern Australian Caves Gilbert J Palaeontology Of Northeastern Australian Caves Gilbert J. Price1, Jonathan Cramb1, Julien Louys2, Yue-Xing Feng1 Afliation: 1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Te University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia; 2Department of Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History, and Languages, ANU College of Asia and the Pacifc, Te Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia Abstract Numerous Australian caves have produced fossil records that have been critical in piecing together the story of the evolution of the continent’s ecosystems through time. Among the most important are those of the Riversleigh World Heritage Area of northeastern Australia. Although the majority of caves in the region have since been destroyed as a result of natural collapses and erosive activities, now-exposed breccias are remarkably abundant in fossils. Te fossil faunas include the distant ancestors of the majority of modern Australian vertebrates, as well as extinct lineages such as those of the marsupial ‘lions’ (Tylacoleonidae) and the diprotodontoids, a group of oversized wombat-like marsupials. Recent radiometric dating in the region, coupled with biochronology, demonstrates that the majority of Riversleigh’s fossil assemblages are Miocene in age (ca. 10-18 million years old). Notably, the younger end of the fossil record is poorly represented at Riversleigh, but other cave systems across northeastern Australia provide the necessary temporal extension that can document the emergence of the modern faunas and ecosystems. Karst-dominated regions such as Chillagoe have produced Quaternary-aged (<2.6 million years) fossils, including species found nowhere else on the continent such as Propelopus chillagoensis (‘Chillagoe’s carnivorous kangaroo’). Chillagoe is also home to the enigmatic extinct land-dwelling crocodile, Quinkana fortirostrum. Recent work in the region has also extended slightly southward to the Broken River karst system. Te fossil assemblages in the Broken River caves mostly represent owl-roost accumulations, although deposits thought to be collected by ghost bats and natural pit-fall traps have also been recognised. Te oldest radiometrically dated fossil deposits are around 350 ka (thousand years old) and include a combination of both extinct and extant faunas. Quaternary geographic range extensions have been recognised for several species including pig-footed bandicoots (Chaeropus spp.), as well as the now-extinct giant short-faced kangaroos (sthenurines), a group previously thought to only occur in southern Australia during the Quaternary. Further to the south, the Mt Etna region provides evidence of signifcant faunal and ecosystem change through the late Quaternary. Rainforest-adapted vertebrates occur in abundance in cave deposits >280 thousand years old, but give way to more open-adapted faunas by around 200 thousand years ago. Keywords: Caves, owls, pitfall traps, vertebrates, megafauna, extinction 1. Introduction Caves play a seemingly unlikely, but remarkable role in documenting the evolution of terrestrial ecosystems through time (Lundelius, 2006). Unwary land animals typically fall into caves, and unable to make their way back out, die underground, with their tough and durable skeletons read- ily becoming incorporated into the fossil record. Such caves are commonly called ‘natural pitfall traps’. Airborne predators such as owls also play a key role in accumulating terrestrial vertebrates in cave settings. Owls will commonly hunt at night targeting a wide range of food resources including small-bod- ied vertebrates. Afer securing a kill, they will tear their victim apart with their beak and talons, usually swallowing the entire carcass in ‘bite-sized’ pieces. Upon returning to the roosting cave, they will regurgitate any undigested remains (e.g., feath- ers, fur, teeth and bones) in the form of pellets that fall to the foor of the cave. Subsequent breakdown and burial of those Figure 1. Map of Australia showing key sites of interest remains may then make their way into the fossil record. Numerous fossil-yielding caves have been reported from the extensive limestone deposits that fringe the modern margin paper is to provide an overview of the vertebrate fossil record of the Australian continent (Hocknull et al., 2007; Price et al., of northeast Australia’s caves. 2009a, b; Reed and Bourne, 2009; Prideaux et al., 2010). Tese caves have been critical in piecing together the story 2. Riversleigh of the evolution of Australia’s terrestrial vertebrates. Among Te oldest and longest record of fossil-bearing caves in Aus- the most important caves are those of northeastern Australia, tralia are those from Riversleigh of northwest Queensland a region that contains not only the oldest record of fossil- (Figure 1). Fossils were frst reported from the region in the bearing caves, but also those that span the longest temporal 1960s, with over 200 fossil sites now known (Archer et al., sequence for any one place on the continent. Te aim of this Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Speleology 25 2006). So important are the fossil deposits of Riversleigh that the region was declared a World Heritage Area in 1994, an honour shared with the Pleistocene-aged Naracoorte Caves of southeastern South Australia. Te basement rocks at Riversleigh are Cambrian in age. During the late Oligocene (ca. 24 million years ago), numer- ous freshwater limestones developed, some of which are rich in fossil vertebrates. Following karstifcation, an extensive series of caves formed within the limestone that later func- tioned as natural pitfalls, efectively trapping a wide variety of terrestrial vertebrates (Arena et al., 2014). Other vertebrate- bearing cave deposits are thought to have accumulated at least in part by predators, such as ghost bats. Te majority of River- sleigh’s cave deposits are Miocene, the oldest dating to ca. 18 million years in age (Woodhead et al., 2016). Although the majority of Riversleigh’s caves have since been A) Lower jaw of a diprotodontoid (wombat-like marsupial) destroyed as a result of natural geological processes, they are encased in rock from Riversleigh; B) Holotype of land- still discernible on the modern landscape and have been the dwelling crocodile, Quinkana fortirostrum, from Chillagoe focus of targeted excavations since the mid-1970s. Te brecci- (Australian Museum Fossil 57844). C) Occlusal view of lower ated deposits are remarkable for the variety of vertebrates that jaw of a sthenurine (giant short-faced) kangaroo from Robert they contain, with the palaeo-diversity comparable to that of Broom Cave, Broken River; D) Fossils of ‘microfauna’ from a modern rainforest in Borneo (Woodhead et al., 2016). Simi- Colosseum Chamber, an owl roost deposit from the Capri- larly, the vast majority of Riversleigh’s fossil vertebrates are corn Caves, Mt Etna region. considered to have been rainforest specialists, especially those from the early and middle Miocene. Amongst the extinct bes- 3. Chillagoe tiary are the earliest ancestors of all the modern major groups Extensive tower karst occurs in the Chillagoe area of north- of marsupials, such as Notoryctomorphia (marsupial ‘moles’), eastern Australia (Figure 1). Te limestone here is late Silu- Peramelemorphia (bandicoots and bilbies), Dasyuromorphia rian – early Devonian (ca. 400 million years old) and contains (Tasmanian devils, Tasmanian ‘tigers’, and dunnarts among numerous fossil molluscs, brachiopods and corals (De Keyser others), Vombatomorphia (wombats), Phascolarctomorphia and Wolf, 1964). Bone breccias are common in the caves, (koalas), Phalangeroidea (possums) and Macropodoidea many of which are topographically higher than the modern (kangaroos and allies) (Archer et al., 2006; Louys et al., 2007; land surface in the region. Black et al., 2014; Butler et al., 2016). Unlike Riversleigh, the majority of caves in the region are still Many of Riversleigh’s fossil vertebrates share a similar body intact, but have not been explored by palaeontologists any- plan to modern Australian vertebrates, but with some bizarre where near as extensively. Te majority of fossil vertebrates exceptions and groups of organisms that are now extinct. For from Chillagoe are small-bodied and include bilbies (Macro- example, the yalkiparidons, informally known as ‘thingo- tis) and pig-footed bandicoots (Chaeropus), species that are donts’, were a group of small-bodied marsupials that possessed found in the historic period only in Australia’s central arid a bony ‘beak’ and may have been ecologically convergent with core (Muirhead and Godthelp, 1995). Teir occurrence at woodpeckers (Beck, 2009). Riversleigh also bore witness to Chillagoe suggests a more open habitat and drier climate in the earliest members of the now-extinct Tylacoleonidae the area in the past. (marsupial ‘lions’) and Diprotodontoidea (marsupial ‘tapirs’ and ‘rhinos’; Figure 2A), two groups that eventually came to Several species of ‘megafauna’ have also been recorded from dominate the top mammalian predator and herbivore niches, around Chillagoe including a species of land crocodile (Quin- respectively, of mid-late Cenozoic Australia (Wroe et al., kana fortirostrum; Figure 2B), giant carnivorous kangaroo 1999; Price and Piper, 2009). (Propleopus chillagoensis), and marsupial ‘tapir’ (Palorchestes azael). Chillagoe is also the type locality for the former two Riversleigh shows remarkable transitions of ecosystems species (Archer et al., 1978;
Recommended publications
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for a New Family of Diprotodontian Marsupials from the Latest Oligocene of Australia and the Evolution
    Title A new family of diprotodontian marsupials from the latest Oligocene of Australia and the evolution of wombats, koalas, and their relatives (Vombatiformes) Authors Beck, RMD; Louys, J; Brewer, Philippa; Archer, M; Black, KH; Tedford, RH Date Submitted 2020-10-13 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR A new family of diprotodontian marsupials from the latest Oligocene of Australia and the evolution of wombats, koalas, and their relatives (Vombatiformes) Robin M. D. Beck1,2*, Julien Louys3, Philippa Brewer4, Michael Archer2, Karen H. Black2, Richard H. Tedford5 (deceased) 1Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, UK 2PANGEA Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 3Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia 4Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom 5Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.M.D.B (email: [email protected]) This pdf includes: Supplementary figures Supplementary tables Comparative material Full description Relevance of Marada arcanum List of morphological characters Morphological matrix in NEXUS format Justification for body mass estimates References Figure S1. Rostrum of holotype and only known specimen of Mukupirna nambensis gen. et. sp. nov. (AMNH FM 102646) in ventromedial (a) and anteroventral (b) views. Abbreviations: C1a, upper canine alveolus; I1a, first upper incisor alveolus; I2a, second upper incisor alveolus; I1a, third upper incisor alveolus; P3, third upper premolar. Scale bar = 1 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • THYLACOLEO CARNIFEX and the NARACOORTE CAVES Michael Curry, Liz Reed1,2 and Steve Bourne3
    RESEARCH CATCHING the MARSUPIAL ‘LION’ by the TAIL: THYLACOLEO CARNIFEX and the NARACOORTE CAVES Michael Curry, Liz Reed1,2 and Steve Bourne3 1School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; 2School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia; 3Naracoorte Lucindale Council, Naracoorte, SA, Australia. “Thylacoleo exemplifies the simplest and most effective dental machinery for predatory life and carnivorous diet known in the Mammalian class. It is the extreme modification, to this end, of the Diprotodont type of Marsupialia.” Owen (1866) Introduction defending Thylacoleo as “A very gentle beast, and of good conscience” (Macleay 1859). Macleay based his Of all the extinct Australian Pleistocene megafauna argument on Thylacoleo’s relationship with other species, Thylacoleo carnifex (the marsupial ‘lion’) has Diprotodont marsupials, most of which are herbivores. captured the imagination and interest of people more Gerard Krefft, Curator of the Australian Museum, was than any other. Perhaps it is the allure of its predatory almost equally as unimpressed with Thylacoleo’s habits, (Australia’s Pleistocene answer to T. rex); or the carnivory, opining that it “…was not much more intriguing notion that it used caves as dens (Lundelius, carnivorous than the Phalangers (possums) of present 1966 ). It is certainly an enigma and, as Owen (1866) time.” (Krefft, 1866). Owen, meanwhile, had received an suggested, an extreme and meat-eating version of the almost complete skull from the Darling Downs, in otherwise herbivorous diprotodont marsupials. Queensland and published a more detailed paper, Spectacular fossil finds over the past few decades have further describing the skull and teeth of Thylacoleo, put to rest much of the speculation regarding its habits acknowledging its diprotodont affiliation but more and morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Family of Diprotodontian Marsupials from the Latest Oligocene of Australia and the Evolution of Wombats, Koalas, and Their Relatives (Vombatiformes) Robin M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A new family of diprotodontian marsupials from the latest Oligocene of Australia and the evolution of wombats, koalas, and their relatives (Vombatiformes) Robin M. D. Beck1,2 ✉ , Julien Louys3, Philippa Brewer4, Michael Archer2, Karen H. Black2 & Richard H. Tedford5,6 We describe the partial cranium and skeleton of a new diprotodontian marsupial from the late Oligocene (~26–25 Ma) Namba Formation of South Australia. This is one of the oldest Australian marsupial fossils known from an associated skeleton and it reveals previously unsuspected morphological diversity within Vombatiformes, the clade that includes wombats (Vombatidae), koalas (Phascolarctidae) and several extinct families. Several aspects of the skull and teeth of the new taxon, which we refer to a new family, are intermediate between members of the fossil family Wynyardiidae and wombats. Its postcranial skeleton exhibits features associated with scratch-digging, but it is unlikely to have been a true burrower. Body mass estimates based on postcranial dimensions range between 143 and 171 kg, suggesting that it was ~5 times larger than living wombats. Phylogenetic analysis based on 79 craniodental and 20 postcranial characters places the new taxon as sister to vombatids, with which it forms the superfamily Vombatoidea as defned here. It suggests that the highly derived vombatids evolved from wynyardiid-like ancestors, and that scratch-digging adaptations evolved in vombatoids prior to the appearance of the ever-growing (hypselodont) molars that are a characteristic feature of all post-Miocene vombatids. Ancestral state reconstructions on our preferred phylogeny suggest that bunolophodont molars are plesiomorphic for vombatiforms, with full lophodonty (characteristic of diprotodontoids) evolving from a selenodont morphology that was retained by phascolarctids and ilariids, and wynyardiids and vombatoids retaining an intermediate selenolophodont condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 63
    Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 63 Queensland Museum Network respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the lands, seas and regions across the state of Queensland. © The State of Queensland, Queensland Museum 2021 PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 Print ISSN 2204-1478 Online NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qm.qld.gov.au A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum The vertebrate fossil collection record from the Chinchilla Sand, South-East Queensland, 1844–2021 Joanne E. WILKINSON1, Kristen A. SPRING1, Tim L. DUNN2, Gilbert J. PRICE3 & Julien LOUYS4. 1. Queensland Museum Geosciences, 122 Gerler Road, Hendra Queensland 4011 Australia; 2. Samford Valley Steiner School, Narrawa Court, Wights Mountain Qld 4520; 3. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane Qld 4072; 4. Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith University, Nathan Qld 4111. Corresponding author: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2021.2020-07 LCID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F09758D3-76A1-4D8B-B90D-371C5A8CE4B9 Citation: Wilkinson, J.E., Spring, K.A., Dunn, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Taphonomy of Oligo-Miocene Fossil Sites of the Riversleigh World Heritage Area, Australia
    AMEGHINIANA (Rev. Asoc. Paleontol. Argent.) - 41 (4): 627-640. Buenos Aires, 30-12-2004 ISSN 0002-7014 Taphonomy of Oligo-Miocene fossil sites of the Riversleigh World Heritage Area, Australia Mina BASSAROVA1 Abstract. Taphonomic analyses were carried out on six sites from the Riversleigh World Heritage Area fossil deposits of northwestern Queensland, Australia. The six sites range in age from late Oligocene to late Miocene and possibly younger. A diverse fossil fauna has been found at these sites, but in this study, only mammalian remains were considered. The aim was to assess the biological and ecological informa- tion obtainable from these sites in anticipation of a palaeoecological study of the sites. To determine if fos- sils from each site were locally derived, specimens were examined for abrasion, breakage, weathering, ev- idence of digestion or scavenging, and skeletal part representation. Age-class distribution analysis of sev- eral peramelemorphians and a subfamily of macropodids was carried out for one of the sites to determine if the mortality profile might be attritional or catastrophic. Vertebrate remains from the six sites are dis- articulated and, in combination with the lack of bone weathering, this suggests rapid burial in moist con- ditions. The majority of specimens are unweathered, unabraded, have a wide range of transport poten- tials and, at this stage, are not suspected to have significant predator/scavenger biases. These sites are therefore interpreted to be autochthonous assemblages. The age-class distribution analysis indicates attri- tional accumulation, however exact duration of accumulation can not be ascertained. Resumen. TAFONOMÍA DE LOS SITIOS FÓSILES DEL ÁREA DE RIVERSLEIGH WORLD HERITAGE (OLIGOCENO- MIOCENO), AUSTRALIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic and Palaeobiological Implications of Postcranial Morphology in the Diprotodontidae (Marsupialia)
    Systematic and palaeobiological implications of postcranial morphology in the Diprotodontidae (Marsupialia) Aaron B. Camens School of Earth and Environmental Sciences Discipline of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology The University of Adelaide South Australia A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Adelaide February 2010 II Declaration This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution to Aaron Camens and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis (as listed below) resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australasian Digital Theses Program (ADTP) and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. Publications in this thesis include: Camens, A. B. and Wells, R.T. 2009. Diprotodontid footprints from the Pliocene of Central Australia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29: 863-869. Copyright held by Taylor and Francis. Camens, A. B. and Wells, R.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 63
    Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 63 Queensland Museum Network respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the lands, seas and regions across the state of Queensland. © The State of Queensland, Queensland Museum 2021 PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 Print ISSN 2204-1478 Online NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qm.qld.gov.au A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum The vertebrate fossil collection record from the Chinchilla Sand, South-East Queensland, 1844–2021 Joanne E. WILKINSON1, Kristen A. SPRING1, Tim L. DUNN2, Gilbert J. PRICE3 & Julien LOUYS4. 1. Queensland Museum Geosciences, 122 Gerler Road, Hendra Queensland 4011 Australia; 2. Samford Valley Steiner School, Narrawa Court, Wights Mountain Qld 4520; 3. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane Qld 4072; 4. Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith University, Nathan Qld 4111. Corresponding author: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2021.2020-07 LCID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F09758D3-76A1-4D8B-B90D-371C5A8CE4B9 Citation: Wilkinson, J.E., Spring, K.A., Dunn, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Gawler's Diprotodon
    TOWN OF GAWLER Gawler’s Diprotodon Diprotodon australis (Source: http://www.goyder.sa.gov.au) Gawler Public Library Institute Building, 91 Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Phone (08) 8522 9213 Fax (08) 8522 9212 Email : [email protected] Website : www.gawler.sa.gov.au Diprotodon australis was the largest marsupial to ever live. Its name means ‘two forward teeth” (di = two; proto = front; dont = tooth) and it was one of the group of animals known, because of their large size, as ‘megafaurna’. There were possibly three species of Diprotodon which lived during the 2 million year time-span known as the Pleistocene which began about 1.8 million years ago and ended roughly 10,000 years ago. Diprotodons became extinct somewhere around (Source: http://www.parks.sa.gov.au) 45,000 years ago. Diprotodons were about the size of a large hippopotamus. A fully grown adult weighed somewhere between 1.5 and 2.5 tonnes and, despite its bulk, was quite fast on its relatively long legs and wombat- like feet. It was a herbivore which fed on trees and shrubs. Its large head had four molars in each jaw, three pairs of upper incisors and one pair of lower incisors. The incisor teeth (which grew continuously throughout the Diprotodon’s life) were perfect for rooting out small shrubs and biting through tough vegetation and the molars (which were as large as a human fist) were designed for slicing and crushing coarse vegetation. The Diprotodon is believed to have had a shaggy coat of hair and it was flat-footed, walking mainly on the outside of the foot.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tiny New Marsupial Lion (Marsupialia, Thylacoleonidae) from the Early Miocene of Australia
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org A tiny new marsupial lion (Marsupialia, Thylacoleonidae) from the early Miocene of Australia Anna K. Gillespie, Michael Archer, and Suzanne J. Hand ABSTRACT Microleo attenboroughi, a new genus and species of diminutive marsupial lion (Marsupialia: Thylacoleonidae), is described from early Miocene freshwater limestones in the Riversleigh World Heritage Area, northwestern Queensland, Australia. A broken palate that retains incomplete cheektooth rows demonstrates that this new, very small marsupial lion possessed the elongate, trenchant P3 and predominantly subtriangular upper molars characteristic of thylacoleonids, while other features of the premolar sup- port its placement in a new genus. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that Microleo atten- boroughi is the sister taxon to all other thylacoleonids, and that Thylacoleonidae may lie outside Vombatomorphia as the sister taxon of all other wombat-like marsupials including koalas. However, given limited data about the cranial morphology of M. atten- boroughi, Thylacoleonidae is concluded here, conservatively, to be part of the vom- batomorphian clade. This new thylacoleonid brings to three the number of marsupial lion species that have been recovered from early Miocene deposits at Riversleigh and indicates a level of diversity previously not seen for this group. It is likely that the differ- ent size and morphology of the three sympatric taxa reflects niche partitioning and hence reduced competition. Thylacoleonids may have been the dominant arboreal predators of Cenozoic Australia. Anna K. Gillespie*, Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives (PANGEA) Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; [email protected], *corresponding author Michael Archer, Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives (PANGEA) Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; [email protected] Suzanne J.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Systematics of Marsupial Lions from the Riversleigh World Heritage Area and the Evolution of the Thylacoleonidae
    DIVERSITY AND SYSTEMATICS OF MARSUPIAL LIONS FROM THE RIVERSLEIGH WORLD HERITAGE AREA AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE THYLACOLEONIDAE ANNA K GILLESPIE Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales 2007 i ABSTRACT The fossil record of marsupial lions (family Thylacoleonidae) from Australian Oligo- Miocene deposits is generally poor. Study of new material of this family collected from Oligo-Miocene limestone sediments of the Riversleigh World Heritage Area, northwestern Queensland adds significant new information about previously described species and also indicates a greater diversity of thylacoleonids during this period of geological time. Two new genera and five new species are described. Reassessment of the holotype of the type species of Priscileo, P. pitikantensis, indicates it shows stronger affinities to species of the genus Wakaleo than it does to Priscileo roskellyae. Priscileo is regarded here to be a junior synonym of Wakaleo. The cranium and lower dentition of Priscileo roskellyae show significant morphological differences from species of Wakaleo, and this species is referred to a new genus, Lekaneleo. Distinctive morphological differences are identified in the M3s of Wakaleo oldfieldi and W. vanderleueri, species previously distinguished only by relative size differences in their dentitions. Functional morphological assessment of postcranial remains of species of Wakaleo suggests that they were probably scansorial or arboreal, but does not support a previous hypothesis of a fossorial habit. Cladistic analyses of the interrelationships of marsupial lions support the referral of Priscileo pitikantensis to the genus Wakaleo. The monotypic genus Microleo is the sister-group to all remaining thylacoleonid taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-A-Ustralian Mammals
    WALiACE'S LINE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF INDO-A-USTRALIAN MAMMALS aBy HENR C.oRAVEN ~BULLTIN' OF ,. A,AMERICAN MUSEUM OF -NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME ILXVIIIS 1935 ARTICLE IV I_ _1 N-I-NEW-T,ORIK A.pr-il: 5,',1935X 4, 7 '.- ..0 4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 2.4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. 4-.4,~~~~~~~~~~ (4, F-' ,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '4/-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .4'. ,~~~~~~~~~~~ *,,~~~~~~4-4,4, 4 "44>4 17,~~~~~~~4.'~.,-7v,-"'.'.~ 44-'.24.444 - - '-4 t4 44's~~~~~~~~~~~~4 -2 - A.t4441P24---'~-" 44- -~~~V -444~~~~ 4'.4~~~~4,444'.-.4'.4- 4'~~~ '-4 2~~'4 ~~44-'.~~~~~~ 4$'.~~~444-~~~~\~~~' - 44'1 4--'~~"I J kq~~4!~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.. ' 4-244'.,'.-. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~6 4., 4 4--,'-~~~~~~~~~~~-2 -4~~~~~~~~7, '4' x 4&.44 /- Article IV.-WALLACE'S LINE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF INDO-AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS By HENRY C. RAVEN With an Introduction by WILLIAM K. GREGORY TEN MAPS CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION, BY WILLIAM K. GREGORY ........................ 179 PART I. ANALYSIS OF THE MAMMALIAN FAUNA OF THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN REGION, BY H. C. RAVEN ......... 182 East Indian Mammals that Transgress Wallace's Line ........... ............................ 182 East Indian Mammals that dQ not Transgress Wal- lace's Line ......... ......................... 198 Notes on the Indo-Australian Subregions and the Sources of their Mammalian Faunas .......... 200 Conclusion .......... .......................... 204 PART II. FAUNAL LISTS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Faunal Lists ................................. 208 Monotremata ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Mammals of Rivensleigh, Northwestern Q,Ueensland
    FossilMammals of Rivensleigh, NorthwesternQ,ueensland: PreliminaryOverview of Biostratigraphy, Correlationand EnvironmentalChange MichaelArcherr, Henk Godthelpl, Suzanne J. Handl and Dirk Megirian2 Abstract Aspects of the results of studies of the fossil-rich Cainozoic deposits of Riversleigh, nofthwestern Queensland, are reviewed. A summary of five selected Riversleigh faunas representing the primary cerioCs of the region's Cainozoic history is provided. Faunal and environmental changes over the last 25 000 004 vears n the Riversleigh region are identified and changes in Australia s rainforest mammal comlnunities over the same period are discussed. Evidence for the origin of Australia s modern mammal qroups front ancestors now known to have lived in the l'ertiary rainforests of northern Australia is reviewed. fhe geological record for Riversleighs more than 100 local faunas is considered. At least three primary inteNals ol Oligo-Niocene deposition, one of Pliocene and ntany of Pleistocene and Holocene depc.ssttbn are identified. An appendix is provided in which the princioal faunal assemblages from Riversleigh are allocated to these depositional intervals. The evidence for ccrrelating Riversleigh local faunas with faunal assemblages in the rest of Australia and the world is reviewed. Oligo-Niocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene marsupial anci monotreme fossils correlate Riversleigh's local faunas with others from central and eastern Australia; bats correlate them with faunal assemblages in Europe: rodertts correlate them with Pliocene assemblages in eastern Australia. Ke.v words: Monotremata, Marsupiaira.Chiroptera. Muridae. Pisces,Amphibia, Reptilia.Aves. A4am- malia. Evolution,Extinction. Rainforest. Freshwater Limestone. Tertiary, Oligocene. Miocene. Pliocene. Pleistocene,Holocene. Correlation,Stratigraphy. Palaeoecoiogy. INTRODUCTION summary of the currentbiostratigraphic data with a focus on Riversleigh'smammai record and its interpretationin Despitelon-cl-term interest in the distinctivemammais a local as well as general context.
    [Show full text]