Eur. J. Entomol. 112(4): 734–746, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.076 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Responses of grassland arthropods to various biodiversity-friendly management practices: Is there a compromise? MONIKA MAZALOVÁ1, JAN ŠIPOŠ 2, STANISLAV RADA1, JOSEF KAŠÁK 3, Bořivoj Šarapatka1 and TOMáš KURAS 1 1 Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Šlechtitelů 241/27, 783 71 Olomouc - Holice, Czech Republic; e-mails:
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected] 2 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, 710 00, Slezská Ostrava, Czech Republic; e-mail:
[email protected] 3 Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 810/3, 613 00 Brno - Černá Pole, Czech Republic; e-mail:
[email protected] Key words. Arthropods, functional diversity, grasslands, mowing, grazing, landscape structure, Czech Republic, Jeseníky Mts Abstract. The rich species pool in semi-natural grasslands is associated with high spatial and temporal heterogeneity. This empirical study is one of the first to jointly analyze the response of orders, individual species and functional richness of arthropods to particular management practices and to linear landscape features, such as strips of grass and belts of trees. Mostly it was the less mobile, flightless taxa that were negatively affected by immediate disturbance caused by mowing. At a larger time-scale, grasslands managed by mow- ing once every year, and especially by a combined regime of mowing and grazing, supported the highest species richness of butterflies and beetles.