DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Cedar Creek Scoped Subwatershed Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Cedar Creek Scoped Subwatershed Study UPPER CEDAR CREEK SCOPED SUBWATERSHED STUDY Prepared for: THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO AND GRAND RIVER CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Prepared by: MATRIX SOLUTIONS INC. WOOD ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS NATURAL RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC. SGL PLANNING & DESIGN Version 1.0 October 2019 Guelph, Ontario Unit 7B, 650 Woodlawn Rd. West Guelph, ON, Canada N1K 1B8 T 519.772.3777 F 226.314.1908 www.matrix-solutions.com UPPER CEDAR CREEK SCOPED SUBWATERSHED STUDY Prepared for the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority October 2019 reviewed by Amanda McKay, P.Eng. Sam Bellamy, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer Principal Water Resources Engineer Matrix Solutions Inc. Matrix Solutions Inc. reviewed by Aaron Farrell, M.Eng., P.Eng., CPM Ron Scheckenberger, M.Eng., P.Eng. Associate Principal Consultant Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions Contributors Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions Natural Resource Solutions Inc. SGL Planning & Design Paul Martin, Aqua Insight Inc DISCLAIMER We certify that this report is accurate and complete and accords with the information available during the site investigation. Information obtained during the site investigation or provided by third parties is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed. We have exercised reasonable skill, care, and diligence in assessing the information obtained during the preparation of this report. This report was prepared for the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Grand River Conservation Authority. The report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without our written consent and that of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Grand River Conservation Authority. Any uses of this report by a third party, or any reliance on decisions made based on it, are the responsibility of that party. We are not responsible for damages or injuries incurred by any third party, as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this report. 24812-528x SWS R 2019-10-03 final V1.0.docx ii Matrix Solutions Inc. Version Control Version Date Issue Type Filename Description V0.1 March 2019 Draft Phase 1 and Phase 2 Reports Issued to client for review V0.2 07-Aug-2019 Draft Revised 24812-528 SWS R 2019-08-07 draft V0.2.docx Compilation report; Issued to client for review V1.0 03-Oct-2019 Final 24812-528 SWS R 2019-10-03 final V1.0.docx Compilation report; Issued to client as final 24812-528x SWS R 2019-10-03 final V1.0.docx iii Matrix Solutions Inc. Executive Summary The Regional Municipality of Waterloo, partnered with the Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA), has retained the consulting teams of Matrix Solutions Inc. (Matrix), Wood Environment and Infrastructure (Wood), Natural Resource Solutions Inc. (NRSI), and SGL Planning & Design (SGL Planning) to undertake the Upper Cedar Creek Scoped Subwatershed Study. The Project Study Area (PSA) lies almost entirely within the Township of North Dumfries, with a small section of the northwest headwaters of Cedar Creek extending to the outskirts of the City of Kitchener, within the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The Project includes two levels of study – a subwatershed-scale analysis for the entirety of the 7,463 ha Cedar Creek Subwatershed (i.e., the PSA), and a detailed local-scale analysis for those lands within the Detailed Study Area (DSA). The DSA consists of Cedar Creek Subwatershed lands north of Cedar Creek Road and west of Dumfries Road within the City of Kitchener and the Township of North Dumfries. Subwatershed studies are an integral component of the land use planning process. They provide fundamental input on natural features, with a focus on water-based elements including watercourses, wetlands, recharge and discharge areas, and other natural systems to help determine appropriate land use designations. Based on a fully integrated examination of how the surface and subsurface water systems work in supporting natural system functionality, various levels of guidance are established through the Subwatershed Study process to protect, restore, manage, and monitor subwatershed resources through subsequent development approvals and other stewardship initiatives. The Scoped Cedar Creek Subwatershed Study was conducted in two (2) phases: a) Phase 1 – Subwatershed Characterization and Integration b) Phase 2 – Impact Assessment & Preliminary Management Strategy Phase 1 of the study is focussed on understanding and characterizing the hydrology, hydrogeology, fluvial geomorphology, and water quality, as well as aquatic and terrestrial ecology of the Upper Cedar Creek Subwatershed, specifically within the DSA. Phase 2 is focussed on assessing the impacts of potential development within the DSA (Southwest Kitchener Policy Area – SKPA, and Prime Industrial Strategic Reserve – PISR), specifically impacts to natural environment features, as well as adjacent municipal well fields. A preliminary management strategy to mitigate identified impacts is also included as part of Phase 2. The land use concepts developed as part of Phase 2 were completed in consultation with Regional planning staff and only represent one possible land development scenario. The land use concept has 24812-528x SWS R 2019-10-03 final V1.0.docx iv Matrix Solutions Inc. been established solely for the purpose of analytical assessments of potential impacts associated with surface and ground water, as well as the associated natural systems. The use of the land use concept for the subject purpose does not suggest any endorsement or support for potential future land uses. Both phases are documented within this consolidated Scoped Subwatershed Study (existing document). The Scoped Subwatershed Study is intended to guide and coordinate decision-making by the Region, area municipalities, the Grand River Conservation Authority, and others involved in development planning and subwatershed stewardship and restoration. Impacts and Management Strategies The impact assessment portion of the SWS identified a number of impacts that may occur, should the potential land use scenarios proceed in an unmitigated fashion. To be clear, it is not expected that any potential development would be permitted to advance without mitigation measures. However, for the purposes of the SWS, it can be useful to assess potential impacts without mitigation so as to understand the scale of mitigation measures required. The following sections describe potential impacts as well as recommended measures to mitigate the identified impacts. Water Budget/Groundwater Recharge Impact In terms of the water budget, the most significant change associated with potential land use scenarios is related to evapotranspiration. As lands are urbanized, and impervious cover increases, rainfall/snowmelt is unable to infiltrate into the upper soil layer. This reduces the amount of available soil moisture that sustains evapotranspiration through dry periods. Rather than infiltrating, this water runs off, becoming stormwater. This has a secondary impact of reducing groundwater recharge to the underlying aquifer. While the impact assessment analysis has shown that the Strasburg municipal wellfield would not be significantly affected by reductions in recharge within the DSA, a number of key environmental features (Roseville Swamp, headwater reaches of Cedar Creek) could be affected by this reduction in groundwater recharge. Mitigation To mitigate this impact, any potential development should be required, at a minimum, to maintain existing groundwater recharge rates. This could be achieved through a combination of infiltration of clean water (e.g., roof runoff) at source, as well as the collection of runoff from paved surfaces (typically carrying contaminants) to a centralized stormwater management facility for appreciate quality treatment and subsequent infiltration. 24812-528x SWS R 2019-10-03 final V1.0.docx v Matrix Solutions Inc. Flooding Impact As described above, with modifications in the water budget associated with potential development, there is a certainty of more stormwater being generated under the potential land use scenarios than under existing conditions. This increased stormwater would eventually discharge into Cedar Creek. Analysis has shown that the unmitigated release of this stormwater into Cedar Creek would increase peak flow rates between Roseville Road and Highway 401 by a range of 33 to 490% (depending on the return interval of the storm event). This is clearly an unacceptable impact and would increase both the 100-year as well as the Regional flood elevations along the length of Cedar Creek. In addition to riverine flooding, there is no defined natural outlet adjacent to the SKPA lands. As a result, unmitigated stormwater discharge would flow overland from the SKPA lands, through multiple land parcels in North Dumfries (largely through agricultural fields and forests), before entering Cedar Creek downstream of Rosevillle Road. This would have significant negative impacts to landowners by frequently inundating lands within the overland flow path. Mitigation To mitigate this impact, it is recommended that potential urban developments shall only discharge stormwater offsite at an approximately similar frequency, rate, and volume as is occurring under baseline conditions. Stormwater that is not discharged offsite should be infiltrated. As described in the Water Budget/Groundwater Recharge summary, the conversion of agricultural lands to urban lands generally results in decreased evapotranspiration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Eastlake Iii Senior Housing Project Ceqa Findings of Fact and Statement of Overri
    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE EASTLAKE III SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS June 7, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 II. ACRONYMS 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6 IV. BACKGROUND 8 V. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 9 VI. FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA 11 VII LEGAL EFFECTS OF FINDINGS 11 VIII MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM 13 IX. SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 14 LAND USE 15 LANDFORM ALTERATION AND AESTHETICS 15 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 15 WATER QUALITY AND HYDROLOGY 15 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 15 AIR QUALITY 16 NOISE 16 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 16 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 17 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES 17 i X CUMULATIVE SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 50 XI FEASIBILITY OF POTENTIAL PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 60 NO PROJECT/NO DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE 63 ALTERNATIVE MIX OF LAND USES 65 REDUCED DENSITY ALTERNATIVE 66 ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE 68 XII STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 69 ii BEFORE THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL RE: EastLake III Senior Housing Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR); SCH #2005091047; EIR 05-02 FINDINGS OF FACT I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Final SEIR) prepared for the EastLake III Senior Housing project addresses the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the project. In addition, the Final SEIR evaluates three alternatives (1) the no development alternative, (2) existing land use designation alternative (commercial tourist), and (3) reduced density alternative (single family residential similar to surrounding development). The Final SEIR represents a second tier EIR, in accordance with CEQA Section 21094, and tiers off the Program EIR prepared for the EastLake Planned Community Master EIR (EIR #81-03).
    [Show full text]
  • SOLAS 2018 Consolidated Edition
    SOLAS 2018 Consolidated Edition CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS PART A-APPLICATION, DEFINITIONS, ETC. Regulation 1 Application* * Refer to MSC-MEPC.5/Circ.8 on Unified interpretation of the application of regulations governed by the building contract date, the keel laying date and the delivery date for the requirements of the SOLAS and MARPOL Conventions. (a) Unless expressly provided otherwise, the present Regulations apply only to ships engaged on international voyages. (b) The classes of ships to which each Chapter applies are more precisely defined, and the extent of the application is shown, in each Chapter. Regulation 2 Definitions For the purpose of the present regulations, unless expressly provided otherwise: (a) Regulations means the regulations contained in the annex to the present Convention. (b) Administration means the Government of the State whose flag the ship is entitled to fly. (c) Approved means approved by the Administration. (d) International voyage means a voyage from a country to which the present Convention applies to a port outside such country, or conversely. (e) A passenger is every person other than: 1 (i) the master and the members of the crew or other persons employed or engaged in any capacity on board a ship on the business of that ship and (ii) a child under one year of age. (f) A passenger ship is a ship which carries more than twelve passengers. (g) A cargo ship is any ship which is not a passenger ship. (h) A tanker is a cargo ship constructed or adapted for the carriage in bulk of liquid cargoes of an inflammable* nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2021 Huntalaskamagazine.Com 1
    Summer 2021 HuntAlaskaMagazine.com 1 Volume 13 | Issue 2 Features Summer 2021 26 Five for Five at Seventy-Five Contents by Dave Grover A remote, do-it-yourself (DIY) moose hunt isn’t for everyone. However, with the right team, the right attitude, the right gear and the willingness to persevere, it’s doable for many. 75-year- old Dave Grover and four partners took fve bulls on their recent DIY adventure. 32 2021 Editors’ Choice Awards by Hunt Alaska Staf Te sixth annual Hunt Alaska Editors’ Choice Awards showcase the best gear we tested in 2020/21. Categories for this year’s awards include Guns and Ammunition; Optics; Packs and Cases; Field Accessories; Knives, Cutting Tools and Sharpeners; Game Processing and Cooking; and Apparel. 54 42 2021 New Gear by Hunt Alaska Staf Now is the time to start gearing up for hunting season! Here’s a short list of some promising new items to consider taking to the feld with you in 2021. Rest assured, we’ll be testing many of these ourselves this fall. Departments 4 Hunt Alaska Online 6 Hunting for a Compliment 46 Grit in Hunters 10 The Hunt by Larry Bartlett and Peggy Keiper For remote hunting trips, grit is often what separates 14 Trip Tips the successful from the unsuccessful. Some have it. Life on the Ledge Some, not so much. What is it, and how does it relate 18 to hunter success? Larry Bartlett and Peggy Keiper tell 22 Red Gold us, along with things we can do to become more gritty.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Sports
    List of sports The following is a list of sports/games, divided by cat- egory. There are many more sports to be added. This system has a disadvantage because some sports may fit in more than one category. According to the World Sports Encyclopedia (2003) there are 8,000 indigenous sports and sporting games.[1] 1 Physical sports 1.1 Air sports Wingsuit flying • Parachuting • Banzai skydiving • BASE jumping • Skydiving Lima Lima aerobatics team performing over Louisville. • Skysurfing Main article: Air sports • Wingsuit flying • Paragliding • Aerobatics • Powered paragliding • Air racing • Paramotoring • Ballooning • Ultralight aviation • Cluster ballooning • Hopper ballooning 1.2 Archery Main article: Archery • Gliding • Marching band • Field archery • Hang gliding • Flight archery • Powered hang glider • Gungdo • Human powered aircraft • Indoor archery • Model aircraft • Kyūdō 1 2 1 PHYSICAL SPORTS • Sipa • Throwball • Volleyball • Beach volleyball • Water Volleyball • Paralympic volleyball • Wallyball • Tennis Members of the Gotemba Kyūdō Association demonstrate Kyūdō. 1.4 Basketball family • Popinjay • Target archery 1.3 Ball over net games An international match of Volleyball. Basketball player Dwight Howard making a slam dunk at 2008 • Ball badminton Summer Olympic Games • Biribol • Basketball • Goalroball • Beach basketball • Bossaball • Deaf basketball • Fistball • 3x3 • Footbag net • Streetball • • Football tennis Water basketball • Wheelchair basketball • Footvolley • Korfball • Hooverball • Netball • Peteca • Fastnet • Pickleball
    [Show full text]
  • Dragon Magazine #116
    D RAGON 1 Magazine Issue #116 SPECIAL ATTRACTION Vol. XI, No. 7 December 1986 9 MARITIME ADVENTURES: Oceans of gaming information Publisher 10 High Seas Margaret M. Foy Mike Cook Ships, from life boats to the glorious tall sails Editor 28 Children of the Deep Todd Mossburg Roger E. Moore Aquatic elves in the AD&D® game Assistant editor Fiction editor 38 The Dragons Bestiary Robin Jenkins Patrick Lucien Marine life as the readers imagine it Price 46 Hello, Your Majesty? Craig Barrett Editorial assistants By ship or by pigeon, the mail must go through Marilyn Favaro Georgia Moore Eileen Lucas Debbie Poutsch 52 High Seas in 3-D Dennis Kauth A 25-mm sailing craft for maritime quests Art director Roger Raupp OTHER FEATURES Production staff Linda Bakk Gloria Habriga 32 The Ecology of the Minotaur Anthony Gerard Betty Elmore Kim Lindau The unusual tale of a lone survivor Carolyn Vanderbilt 36 Readers Surprise James A. Gollata Advertising Subscriptions Our favorite double take of the month Mary Parkinson Pat Schulz 54 Rogue Stones and Gemjumping Ed Greenwood The perfect holiday gift for trouble-prone mages Creative editors Ed Greenwood Jeff Grubb 58 By Tooth and Claw Gregory W. Detwiler Never laugh at hyaenas, and other wild advice Contributing artists 66 High Ones, Ancient Ones Michael DeWolfe and Galan Akin Peter Botsis Sue Weller Playing High Ones in the ELFQUEST® game world Roger Raupp Jim Holloway David Trampier Larry Elmore 69 The Role of Computers Hartley and Pattie Lesser James A. Gollata Dennis Kauth Dragonfire II and Bard’s Tale pass the test Wendi Pini Robert Maurus 80 The Marvel®-Phile Jeff Grubb Bruce Simpson Joseph Pillsbury Dont get caught in the Crossfire Diesel Mark Saunders Francis Mao Gustave Doré 84 Doctor Who? Margaret Weis and Michael P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Shasta Region
    2018 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Shasta Region Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report SCH#2014022018 prepared by Shasta Regional Transportation Agency 1255 East Street, Suite 202 Redding, California, 96001 Contact: Sean Tiedgen, Senior Transportation Planner Phone: (530) 262‐6185 prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 4825 J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, California, 95819 August 2018 2018 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Shasta Region Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report SCH#2014022018 prepared by Shasta Regional Transportation Agency 1255 East Street, Suite 202 Redding, California, 96001 Contact: Sean Tiedgen, Senior Transportation Planner Phone: (530) 262‐6185 prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 4825 J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, California, 95819 August 2018 This report prepared on 50% recycled paper with 50% post‐consumer content. Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................ES‐1 Project Synopsis .........................................................................................................................ES‐1 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................ES‐2 Areas of Known Controversy .....................................................................................................ES‐3
    [Show full text]
  • Community Mitigation Handbook
    HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY VULNERABILITY STUDY: COMMUNITY MITIGATION HANDBOOK A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW OF MITIGATION STRATEGIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ‘PERILS OF FLOOD,’ FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY VOLUME 2 OF THE COMMUNITY VULNERABILITY STUDY (CVS) OCTOBER, 2020 1 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FACULTY School of Architecture and Community Design Brian Cook, ASLA, MLA, PLA Community Vulnerability Study Project Manager Visiting Assistant Research Professor School of Architecture and Community Design The Florida Center for Community Design Research Taryn Sabia, Ed.M., M. Arch, MUCD Director and Research Associate Professor School of Architecture and Community Design The Florida Center for Community Design Research College of Public Health Joe Bohn, Ph.D., MBA Assistant Professor, Director, Community Engagement & Deputy Director, DrPH Program USF College of Public Health Marie Bourgeois Ph.D., MPH Assistant Professor College of Public Health Center for Environmental/Occupational Risk Analysis and Management Elizabeth A. Dunn, MPH, CPH Instructor, I Global Disaster Management, Humanitarian Relief, and Homeland Security College of Public Health GRADUATE ASSISTANTS Florida Center for Community Design and Research Emilia Ribadeneira William Cook Ana Cheng Margaret Winter College of Public Health Carson Bell, MPH William Gardner, MPH Amy Polen 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 DOCUMENT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Point Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment
    Coyote Point Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment PRODUCED FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO MARCH 2019 Coyote Point Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Final Report | March 2019 Acknowledgements This project was a collaboration between the County of San Mateo’s Parks Department and Office of Sustainability to meet the requirements of California Assembly Bill (AB) 691. The following people were involved in the development of this work: Parks Department: Peggy Jensen, Interim Director Nicholas Calderon, Assistant Director Scott Lombardi, Superintendent Sam Herzberg, Senior Planner Ty Kang, Ranger IV, District I Kevin O Brien, Ranger III, District I Mark Bettis, Harbormaster, District VI Office of Sustainability: Marcus Griswold, Climate Resiliency Specialist, Project Manager Hilary Papendick, Climate Change Program Manager Jasneet Sharma, Lead Climate Resiliency Specialist Jim Eggemeyer, Director Danielle Lee, Assistant Director Produced by: Moffatt & Nichol 2185 N. California Blvd., Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3500 T 925.944.5411 www.moffattnichol.com Creative People, Practical Solutions.® i Coyote Point Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Final Report | March 2019 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................... i Glossary .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR ASCON LANDFILL SITE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA MAY 2015 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR ASCON LANDFILL SITE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #2013041010 Prepared For: DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, California 90630-4732 Prepared By: PCR SERVICES CORPORATION 2121 Alton Parkway, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92606 MAY 2015 Table of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 2.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT EIR AND REIR ...................................................................... 2‐1 3.0 CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR AND REIR ................................................................. 3‐1 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ............................................................................. 4‐1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A – PUBLIC MEETING TRANSCRIPTS ‐ SEPTEMBER 12TH, 2013, AND NOVEMBER 6TH, 2014, PUBLIC MEETINGS APPENDIX B – MEMO RE: POTENTIAL USE OF RODENTICIDES AND ERADICATION OF COYOTES List of Figures Page 4.6‐3 Conceptual Exposure Model – Remediation Activities ................................................................................. 3‐13 List of Tables Page 2‐1 Summary of Comments on the Draft EIR and REIR .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Plan
    STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR LAKE MEADE PARK – NEIGHBORHOOD PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CITY OF CAPE CORAL LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for: City of Cape Coral 1015 Cultural Park Boulevard Cape Coral, Florida 33915 Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway – Suite 700 Tampa, FL 33607 DATE: March 2021 REV. DATE: Note: This stormwater management report is prepared to support applications to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and City of Cape Coral. PAGE 1 SIGNATURE PAGE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S SEAL AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, Inc. 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway, Suite 700 Tampa, Florida 33607 813.286.1711 State of Florida Authorization No.: 00000002 Engineer in Responsible Charge: Kevin M. Westberry, PE Professional Registration No.: 65718 This document has been digitally DATE: 05/07/21 signed and sealed by: Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the S.H.A. Authentication Code must be verified on any electronic copies. The above-named Professional Engineer shall be responsible for the proposed design content presented in this report in accordance with Rule 61G10-11.011, 61G15-23.005 and 61G15-23.004 (Digital), F.A.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 4 2.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE INFORMATION
    [Show full text]
  • Article 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS*
    PART III Escambia County Land Development Code DISCLAIMER: This is for general information on the land use regulations within the unincorporated areas of Escambia County. Please note that Escambia County regularly amends its land use regulations and that recent amendments may not yet be shown on this website. Accordingly, when buying, selling, or developing land in Escambia County, please come in to our office & speak with a Front Counter Planner for assistance on the most current regulations affecting your property. 10/2015 Table of Contents LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) Chapter 1 Administration Article 1 General Provisions Sec. 1-1.1 Purpose of chapter. Sec. 1-1.2 Purpose of article. Sec. 1-1.3 Title of code. Sec. 1-1.4 Authority of Land Development Code (LDC). Sec. 1-1.5 Purpose of LDC. Sec. 1-1.6 Enforcement of LDC compliance. Sec. 1-1.7 Applicability of LDC provisions. Sec. 1-1.8 Effective date of LDC provisions. Sec. 1-1.9 Impartiality of LDC provisions. Sec. 1-1.10 Adjustments to LDC provisions. Sec. 1-1.11 Rules for understanding LDC provisions. Sec. 1-1.12 Appeal of LDC-based determinations. Sec. 1-1.13 Relation of LDC to other authorities. Sec. 1-1.14 Conflicting provisions with and within LDC. Sec. 1-1.15 Severability of LDC provisions. Article 2 Nonconformance Sec. 1-2.1 Purpose of article. Sec. 1-2.2 General conditions Sec. 1-2.3 Continuing nonconformance. Article 3 County Officials Sec. 1-3.1 Purpose of article. Sec. 1-3.2 County Administrator.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragon Magazine #250
    THE DEEP FEATURES Heroes of the Sea James Wyatt Aquatic PCs for your AD&D® game campaign. 26 DEPARTMENTS The Dimernesti 80 Wyrms of the North Steven Kenson Ed Greenwood The Silmerhelms The sea elves of Krynn are deeper than you think. are kept safe by The Wyrm Who Watches. 36 86 Dragon’s Bestiary Johnathan M. Richards A small Warships of the Sea menagerie of new Aquatic Creatures. 92 Arcane Lore Keith Francis Strohm Paul Fraser Learn where the New vessels, cannons, and a seafarer's lexicon. earth-sorcerer Tisan gained her power 44 in Secrets of the Arch-Geomancer. 96 Bazaar of the Bizarre Interfaces: The World of the Mechalus Lloyd Brown Ill Next time you're making a wish list, ask your DM for so Wolfgang Baur Magic with Class. Who are these half-mechanical aliens? 54 Sunken Treasures COLUMNS Steve Berman How to salvage that soggy swag. THE WYRMS TURN . .4 D-MAIL ....................... .6 64 FORUM ........................ 10 SAGE ADVICE ................... .18 Fiction OUT OF CHARACTER . .24 DRAGONMIRTH ............... .100 Dedrak's Quest CONVENTION CALENDAR ......... 102 Tracy Hickman ROLEPLAYING REVIEWS .......... .106 KNIGHTS OF THE DINNER TABLE ... .112 70 PREVIEWS ..................... 114 PROFILES ..................... .120 STAFF Publisher Wendy Noritake Executive Editor Pierce Watters Editor Dave Gross Art Director Larry Smith Associate Editor Chris Perkins Editorial Assistant Jesse Decker Production Manager John Dunn Advertising Sales Manager Bob Henning Advertising Traffic Manager Judy Smitha ON THE COVER Mark Nelson graces our cover with his vision of a fabulous undersea encounter. DRAGON® Magazine (ISSN 0279-6848) is published monthly except November (twice monthly) by TSR, Inc., 1801 Lind Avenue S.W., Renton, WA 98055, United States of America.
    [Show full text]