Angelopoulos and the Lingua Franca of Modernism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Angelopoulos and the Lingua Franca of Modernism IntrodUctIon Angelopoulos and the Lingua Franca of Modernism Angelos Koutsourakis and Mark Steven he twenty-eighth Cannes Film Festival in 1975 was marked by the T enthusiastic reception of a film that did not officially represent Greece, the country of its production. The right-wing government of the time refused to nominate it because it considered the leftist portrayal of modern national history offensive. Yet a Greek filmmaker and his crew managed to smuggle a copy of this film and show it as part of Pierre-Henri Deleau’s renowned pro- gramme, the Directors’ Fortnight. The filmmaker was Theo Angelopoulos and the film Ο Θίασος (The Travelling Players, 1975). While the organisers of the festival were trying to find ways to sidestep the rules stipulating that only national commissions could be awarded festival prizes, by May 20, 1975 this 230-minute film had enjoyed its fourth screening in Cannes. Deleau’s anecdote typifies the passionate response of the cinéphile community: I remember once we had a four-hour film, and we thought no one would stay until the end. But it was Angelopoulos’ The Travelling Players: it got a standing ovation. At the back of the auditorium, there was this strange-looking man walking up and down in an almost military fashion, staring straight at Angelopoulos, who had his back to the stage. The man started to walk towards him and Angelopoulos began to get worried. Then he went down on his knees, kissed Angelopoulos’ feet and left without saying a word. It was Werner Herzog. Later, when I mentioned this to Werner, he told me that the film had made him jealous so he had to genuflect before the filmmaker. That’s the rivalry between great filmmakers, a kind of good jealousy. (cited in Mandelbaum 2008) Eventually, the Cannes Film Festival broke its own rules, and The Travelling Players received the FIPRESCI Grand Prix. The film’s storyline follows a group of actors who travel in Greece during the turbulent years 1939–1952, 2 angelos koUtsoUrakIs and mark steven so as to perform a traditional bucolic drama, Golfo. Their performances are routinely interrupted by the major traumatic events of Greek history: the Metaxas dictatorship in the 1930s, the Italian invasion in 1940, the German occupation, the Greek Civil War, and the years after the defeat of the Left in the Civil War. The following year, Hugh Jenkins, the UK minister of Arts, said that The Travelling Players ‘was the most original and most important movie of 1975’, (cited in Stamatiou 1976) and the film was subsequently awarded Best Film of the Year by the British Film Institute. In France and Britain, writers in journals such as Positif and Sight and Sound announced the birth of ‘a new epic cinema’ (Jordan 1975) and ‘a film reverberating with metaphor and meaning’ (Wilson 1975: 58), while in Germany a film critic went so far as to claim that The Travelling Players was as significant in the history of cinema as The Battleship Potemkin (1925) and Roma Città Aperta (Rome Open City, 1945) (Buchcka cited in Themelis 1998: 126). Meanwhile, the film was successfully sold in Europe, in Asia and in South America, and Angelopoulos thus became a world-renowned director, whose unique style would influence filmmakers across the globe. These filmmakers include Chen Kaige,1 Jorge Sanjinés, Bernardo Bertolucci,2 Jessica Hope Woodworth, Peter Brosens, Bahman Ghobadi, and many more. But who was this Greek filmmaker who emerged from relative obscurity to become one of the canonical figures in modernist European art cinema? In France, this was not the first time he had been the topic of discussion within cinéphilic circles. In 1962, studying at the Institut des hautes études cinématographiques (Institute for Advanced Cinematographic Studies) in Paris, Angelopoulos acquired notoriety for refusing to shoot the compulsory short- film assignment using the standardised dramaturgical tropes. Instead, he decided to re-shoot a scene from Roger Vadim’s Les liaisons dangereuses (Dangerous Liaisons, 1959) using a 360° pan. While his colleagues at the Institute responded wholeheartedly to the young filmmaker’s completed project, his teacher took disciplinary action and recommended Angelopoulos’ expulsion from the school. A protest letter was signed by his classmates, as well as by important film intellectuals such as George Sadoul and Jean Mitry, but it all came to no avail. Forced to leave the IDHEC, Angelopoulos found temporary refuge in Jean Rouch’s Musée de l’Homme, where he familiarised himself with formal tropes associated with cinéma vérité. Angelopoulos was also a committed cinéphile. Prior to studying cinema he worked as a ticket seller in the Cinémathèque in Paris and as he recalled he became one of the rates de la Cinémathèque (rats of the Cinémathèque), and watched a plethora of films ranging from classical Hollywood to European and Asian cinema. Such was his belief in the visual capacity of the medium to communicate meaning that he enthusiastically watched dozens of Japanese films, even though there were no subtitles available (Archimandritis 2013: 24). IntrodUctIon 3 Figure I.1 The Travelling Players 4 angelos koUtsoUrakIs and mark steven Angelopoulos’ Parisian training was fundamental to his subsequent desire to make films that would engage with questions of national and historical specificity by using the late modernist style and a visual language that, as Alexander Kluge points out in the foreword to this book, could address his- torical concerns, dreams and failures on a global scale. Thus, not unlike other representatives of the New Waves in World Cinema, his project was thor- oughly anti-nationalist. As Paul Willemen rightly observes, films concerned with issues of national specificity are always ‘anti-nationalist’ because they refuse to subscribe to nationalist homogenising projects (2006: 36). In the case of Angelopoulos, one needs to add, they also play a political role, since they intend to actively shape the audience’s view of the historical particularity and therefore situation of a specific country. The mode of late modernist art cinema, as András Bálint Kovács observes, was (and it still remains) particularly pertinent in this regard, precisely because it also served the ‘modernization of a traditional national cultural environment through its integration into the modern cinematic universe’ (2007: 181). In Angelopoulos’ case, this modernisation also involved building an audience by writing seriously about cinema hence, like a number of filmmakers associated with the Nouvelle Vague, he started his career as a film-critic. Yet the task of modernising the Greek cultural landscape had, for Angelopoulos, a utopian dimension. In 1969, in an interview with his friend Vassilis Rafailidis, he explained that the cinema they desired was not the escapist one that helps one forget about everyday problems, but a cinema that keeps insistently remind- ing the viewer of his or her everyday reality (cited in Rafailidis 2003: 137). Tellingly, this desire went hand in hand with a belief in using a set of stylistic and formal narrative devices associated with modernism. As Kovács argues, the endeavoured modernisation of national film cultures in the 1960s relied deeply on ‘the employment of a set of universal stylistic solutions’ (2013: 3–4) that were successfully applied to different cultural traditions. In this context, the modernisation of different national film cultures entailed a wish to use cinema as a means of rethinking the reality of the nation by appealing to an audience beyond the national borders. This grand project initiated by the modernist art cinema says something about the utopian dream of cinema turning into a universal language of images, a dream very much thwarted by the emergence of sound and spoken dialogue. It is possible to concede here that the late modernist cinematic project was an attempt (albeit a failed one) to internationalise different film cultures without evading questions of national and historical specificity. Put simply, one cannot dissociate the films of Godard, Fassbinder, Pasolini, Visconti, Antonioni, Solanas, Jancsó, Oshima, the Taviani brothers, Pereira dos Santos, Rocha, or Angelopoulos from the national and historical contexts to which they refer. The fact that many of these filmmakers were more popular abroad IntrodUctIon 5 than in their homelands testifies to the great potential that modernist art cinema had in globalising national film cultures that shared common stylistic elements and modernist norms. Indeed, one might venture to suggest that modernist art cinema is a good example of a sustained attempt to allow for the inclusive mobility and exchange of cultural objects, which were able to address a number of national historical questions. Alain Badiou, a confirmed adversary of abstractly universal ideas, has indicated the ways that filmmakers commit- ted to national historical enquiries have produced films with universal appeal. In a passage worth quoting, Badiou claims that: During at least one temporal sequence, the cinema’s mass dimension was not incompatible with a direct concern to invent forms in which the reality of a country occurs as a problem. This was the case in Germany, as the escort of leftism (Fassbinder, Schroeter, Wenders . .), in Portugal after the 1975 revolution (Oliveira, Botelho . .), and in Iran after the Islamic revolution (Kiarostami). In all of these examples it is clear that what cinema is capable of touches the country, as a subjective category (what is it to be from this country?). There are cinema-ideas concerning this point, such as its previous invisibility is revealed by the event. The cinema is then both modern and broad in its action. A national cinema with a universal address emerges; a national school, recognizable in everything up to its insistence on certain formal aspects. (2013: 143) The productive paradox in Badiou’s formulation is precisely that filmmakers preoccupied with their national reality managed to increase the visibility of their outputs and the national questions these outputs sought to address by means of their reliance on a set of transnational stylistic features.
Recommended publications
  • Yunanistan'da Monarşi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme
    Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü Atatürk Yolu Dergisi S. 58, Bahar 2016, s.99-121 Makalenin geliş ve kabul tarihleri: 20.01.2016 – 25.04.2016 YUNANİSTAN’DA MONARŞİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME Çiğdem KILIÇOĞLU CİHANGİR ÖZ Modern Yunanistan, kurulduğu tarihten bugüne kadar siyasi açıdan oldukça iniş- çıkışlı dönemlere sahne olmuştur. Yunan siyasi tarihinin öne çıkan en önemli özelliklerinden birisi, ülkenin yönetim biçimi bağlamında, mutlak monarşiden anayasal monarşiye ve parlamenter cumhuriyete kadar birçok deneyimin yaşanmış olmasıdır. Ancak bu deneyimlerden anayasal monarşi ve cumhuriyet yönetimlerinin aralıklarla ve birbirlerini kesintiye uğratarak devam etmesi dikkat çekicidir. Bu çerçevede, Yunanistan’da monarşinin kısa tarihine göz atıldığında, tahta geçen kralların akıbetleri bakımından çoğunlukla olumsuz ve ilginç bir tablo ile karşılaşmak mümkündür. Nitekim Yunanistan’ın ilk kralı Otto (Othon) krallıktan ihraç edilmiş, ardından tahta çıkan I. Georgios bir suikast girişimiyle öldürülmüş, Georgios’un oğlu I. Konstantinos ilki geçici olmak üzere iki defa tahttan indirilmiş, ardından oğlu Aleksandros evcil bir maymun ısırığıyla hayatını kaybetmiş, Kral II. Georgios cumhuriyetin ilanıyla düşürülmüş, yalnızca II. Georgios’un kardeşi Kral Paulos’un hükümdarlığı menfi sonuçlanmamıştır. Ancak Paulos’un ölümünün ardından Yunan Krallığı tahtına çıkan II. Konstantinos da Albaylar Cuntası dönemindeki başarısız karşı darbe girişiminden dolayı ülkeden ayrılmıştır. Nitekim II. Konstantinos’un tahtını bırakması, Yunanistan’da krallığın
    [Show full text]
  • The Unsettled Debate: Monarchy and Republic in Spain and Greece in the Interwar Years*
    ■ Assaig] ENTREMONS. UPF JOURNAL OF WORLD HISTORY Barcelona ﺍ Universitat Pompeu Fabra Número 6 (juny 2014) www.entremons.org The Unsettled Debate: Monarchy and Republic in Spain and Greece in the Interwar Years* Enric UCELAY-DA CAL (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) abstract The following essay examines the political development in Spain and Greece between the World War I and World War II, comparing these two Mediterranean countries and placing them in a broader European and global context. The conflict between the supporters of monarchy and republic as forms of government was extremely important in the political debate in both countries, and shaped their history in a quite remarkable way. The discussion of these intricate dynamics will help to appreciate the problems that Spain and Greece faced at that time, and can also contribute to a deeper understanding of some key features of the historical change in these two countries. resumen El siguiente ensayo examina el desarrollo político en España y Grecia en el período entre la Primera y la Segunda Guerra Mundial, comparando estos dos países mediterráneos y situándolos en un contexto europeo y global más amplio. El conflicto entre los partidarios de la monarquía y la república como formas de gobierno fue muy importante en el debate político de ambos países, influyendo en su historia de una manera muy notable. La discusión de estas dinámicas complicadas ayudará a apreciar mejor los problemas a los que España y Grecia se enfrentaban en ese momento, contribuyendo asimismo a una comprensión más profunda de algunas de las características clave del cambio histórico en estos dos países.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory, History, and Entrapment in the Temporal Gateway Film
    Lives in Limbo: Memory, History, and Entrapment in the Temporal Gateway Film Sarah Casey Benyahia A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Department of Literature, Film, and Theatre Studies University of Essex October 2018 Abstract This thesis examines the ways in which contemporary cinema from a range of different countries, incorporating a variety of styles and genres, explores the relationship to the past of people living in the present who are affected by traumatic national histories. These films, which I’ve grouped under the term ‘temporal gateway’, focus on the ways in which characters’ experiences of temporality are fragmented, and cause and effect relationships are loosened as a result of their situations. Rather than a recreation of historical events, these films are concerned with questions of how to remember the past without being defined and trapped by it: often exploring past events at a remove through techniques of flashback and mise-en-abyme. This thesis argues that a fuller understanding of how relationships to the past are represented in what have traditionally been seen as different ‘national’ cinemas is enabled by the hybridity and indeterminacy of the temporal gateway films, which don’t fit neatly into existing categories discussed and defined in memory studies. This thesis employs an interdisciplinary approach in order to draw out the features of the temporal gateway film, demonstrating how the central protagonist, the character whose life is in limbo, personifies the experience of living through the past in the present. This experience relates to the specifics of a post-trauma society but also to a wider encounter with disrupted temporality as a feature of contemporary life.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Factsheet Petros Markaris Crossing Athens
    Book factsheet Petros Markaris General Fiction, Travel writing Crossing Athens 208 pages 11.3 × 18 cm August 2013 Published by Diogenes as Quer durch Athen Original title: Athena tes mias diadromes World rights are handled by Diogenes (except Greek rights) Rights currently sold: French (Miel des anges) Italian (La nave di Teseo) Spanish/world (Tusquets) Turkish (Istos) Awards 2019 ›Premi a la trajectòria literària‹ des El Segre de Negre Literaturfestivals, Lleida, Katalonien 2019 ›Premi Cubelles Noir‹ für die Krimifigur Kostas Charitos des Gènere Negre del Garraf Festivals, Barcelona 2019 ›Premio Contea di Bormio‹ des La Milanesiana Festivals, Bormio 2018 ›Premio Negra y Ciminal‹-Preis des 3. Festival Atlantico des Krimigenres ›Tenerife Noir‹ für sein Lebenswerk in der Stadtbibliothek von Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2016 Ehrendoktorwürde der Aristoteles Universität Thessaloniki in der Abteilung für Deutsche Sprache und Philologie 2014 ›Bundesverdienstkreuz 1. Klasse‹, verliehen in Athen vom Deutschen Botschafter 2013 ›Prix Le Point du polar européen‹ der französischen Wochenzeitung Le Point für Faule Kredite 2013 Spanischer Übersetzerpreis ›Premio Literario Arcebispo Juan de San Clemente‹ für Zahltag 2013 ›Goethe-Medaille‹ 2012 VII Premi Pepe Carvalho für seine ›Kostas-Charitos‹-Romane 2012 Am 34. Fregene Prize for Journalism, Literature Scientific and Cultural Research ist Petros Markaris der Gewinner in der Kategorie A Journey from Piraeus to Kifissia with 24 maps. ›International Prize‹ In his detective novels, Petros Markaris sends Inspector Haritos 2011 ›Raymond Chandler Award‹ beim through the labyrinths of Athens – this time, he takes his readers italienischen Film- und Literaturfestival along, travelling across the city with them on Line 1 of the venerable ›Courmayeur Noir‹ für sein Lebenswerk metro.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117
    The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOD, RICHARD #1117 September 1989 - June 1997 Biography: Richard Roud ( 1929-1989), as director of both the New York and London Film Festivals, was responsible for both discovering and introducing to a wider audience many of the important directors of the latter half th of the 20 - century (many of whom he knew personally) including Bernardo Bertolucci, Robert Bresson, Luis Buiiuel, R.W. Fassbinder, Jean-Luc Godard, Werner Herzog, Terry Malick, Ermanno Ohni, Jacques Rivette and Martin Scorsese. He was an author of books on Jean-Marie Straub, Jean-Luc Godard, Max Ophuls, and Henri Langlois, as well as the editor of CINEMA: A CRITICAL DICTIONARY. In addition, Mr. Roud wrote extensive criticism on film, the theater and other visual arts for The Manchester Guardian and Sight and Sound and was an occasional contributor to many other publications. At his death he was working on an authorized biography of Fran9ois Truffaut and a book on New Wave film. Richard Roud was a Fulbright recipient and a Chevalier in the Legion of Honor. Scope and contents: The Roud Collection (9 Paige boxes, 2 Manuscript boxes and 3 Packages) consists primarily of book research, articles by RR and printed matter related to the New York Film Festival and prominent directors. Material on Jean-Luc Godard, Francois Truffaut and Henri Langlois is particularly extensive. Though considerably smaller, the Correspondence file contains personal letters from many important directors (see List ofNotable Correspondents). The Photographs file contains an eclectic group of movie stills.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Films 1999-2019/20 Sorted by Film Title 10
    Phoenix Films 1999-2019/20 Sorted by Film Title Film Date Rating(%) 2046 1-Feb-2006 68 120BPM (Beats Per Minute) 24-Oct-2018 75 3 Coeurs 14-Jun-2017 64 35 Shots of Rum 13-Jan-2010 65 45 Years 20-Apr-2016 83 5 x 2 3-May-2006 65 A Bout de Souffle 23-May-2001 60 A Clockwork Orange 8-Nov-2000 81 A Fantastic Woman 3-Oct-2018 84 A Farewell to Arms 19-Nov-2014 70 A Highjacking 22-Jan-2014 92 A Late Quartet 15-Jan-2014 86 A Man Called Ove 8-Nov-2017 90 A Matter of Life and Death 7-Mar-2001 80 A One and A Two 23-Oct-2001 79 A Prairie Home Companion 19-Dec-2007 79 A Private War 15-May-2019 94 A Room and a Half 30-Mar-2011 75 A Royal Affair 3-Oct-2012 92 A Separation 21-Mar-2012 85 A Simple Life 8-May-2013 86 A Single Man 6-Oct-2010 79 A United Kingdom 22-Nov-2017 90 A Very Long Engagement 8-Jun-2005 80 A War 15-Feb-2017 91 A White Ribbon 21-Apr-2010 75 Abouna 3-Dec-2003 75 About Elly 26-Mar-2014 78 Accident 22-May-2002 72 After Love 14-Feb-2018 76 After the Storm 25-Oct-2017 77 After the Wedding 31-Oct-2007 86 Alice et Martin 10-May-2000 All About My Mother 11-Oct-2000 84 All the Wild Horses 22-May-2019 88 Almanya: Welcome To Germany 19-Oct-2016 88 Amal 14-Apr-2010 91 American Beauty 18-Oct-2000 83 American Honey 17-May-2017 67 American Splendor 9-Mar-2005 78 Amores Perros 7-Nov-2001 85 Amour 1-May-2013 85 Amy 8-Feb-2017 90 An Autumn Afternoon 2-Mar-2016 66 An Education 5-May-2010 86 Anna Karenina 17-Apr-2013 82 Another Year 2-Mar-2011 86 Apocalypse Now Redux 30-Jan-2002 77 Apollo 11 20-Nov-2019 95 Apostasy 6-Mar-2019 82 Aquarius 31-Jan-2018 73
    [Show full text]
  • Tape ID Title Language Type System
    Tape ID Title Language Type System 1361 10 English 4 PAL 1089D 10 Things I Hate About You (DVD) English 10 DVD 7326D 100 Women (DVD) English 9 DVD KD019 101 Dalmatians (Walt Disney) English 3 PAL 0361sn 101 Dalmatians - Live Action (NTSC) English 6 NTSC 0362sn 101 Dalmatians II (NTSC) English 6 NTSC KD040 101 Dalmations (Live) English 3 PAL KD041 102 Dalmatians English 3 PAL 0665 12 Angry Men English 4 PAL 0044D 12 Angry Men (DVD) English 10 DVD 6826 12 Monkeys (NTSC) English 3 NTSC i031 120 Days Of Sodom - Salo (Not Subtitled) Italian 4 PAL 6016 13 Conversations About One Thing (NTSC) English 1 NTSC 0189DN 13 Going On 30 (DVD 1) English 9 DVD 7080D 13 Going On 30 (DVD) English 9 DVD 0179DN 13 Moons (DVD 1) English 9 DVD 3050D 13th Warrior (DVD) English 10 DVD 6291 13th Warrior (NTSC) English 3 nTSC 5172D 1492 - Conquest Of Paradise (DVD) English 10 DVD 3165D 15 Minutes (DVD) English 10 DVD 6568 15 Minutes (NTSC) English 3 NTSC 7122D 16 Years Of Alcohol (DVD) English 9 DVD 1078 18 Again English 4 Pal 5163a 1900 - Part I English 4 pAL 5163b 1900 - Part II English 4 pAL 1244 1941 English 4 PAL 0072DN 1Love (DVD 1) English 9 DVD 0141DN 2 Days (DVD 1) English 9 DVD 0172sn 2 Days In The Valley (NTSC) English 6 NTSC 3256D 2 Fast 2 Furious (DVD) English 10 DVD 5276D 2 Gs And A Key (DVD) English 4 DVD f085 2 Ou 3 Choses Que Je Sais D Elle (Subtitled) French 4 PAL X059D 20 30 40 (DVD) English 9 DVD 1304 200 Cigarettes English 4 Pal 6474 200 Cigarettes (NTSC) English 3 NTSC 3172D 2001 - A Space Odyssey (DVD) English 10 DVD 3032D 2010 - The Year
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Myth and Drama in Greek Cinema (1930–2012): an Overall Approach
    Konstantinos KyriaKos ANCIENT GREEK MYTH AND DRAMA IN GREEK CINEMA (1930–2012): AN OVERALL APPROACH Ι. Introduction he purpose of the present article is to outline the relationship between TGreek cinema and themes from Ancient Greek mythology, in a period stretching from 1930 to 2012. This discourse is initiated by examining mov- ies dated before WW II (Prometheus Bound, 1930, Dimitris Meravidis)1 till recent important ones such as Strella. A Woman’s Way (2009, Panos Ch. Koutras).2 Moreover, movies involving ancient drama adaptations are co-ex- amined with the ones referring to ancient mythology in general. This is due to a particularity of the perception of ancient drama by script writers and di- rectors of Greek cinema: in ancient tragedy and comedy film adaptations,3 ancient drama was typically employed as a source for myth. * I wish to express my gratitude to S. Tsitsiridis, A. Marinis and G. Sakallieros for their succinct remarks upon this article. 1. The ideologically interesting endeavours — expressed through filming the Delphic Cel- ebrations Prometheus Bound by Eva Palmer-Sikelianos and Angelos Sikelianos (1930, Dimitris Meravidis) and the Longus romance in Daphnis and Chloë (1931, Orestis Laskos) — belong to the origins of Greek cinema. What the viewers behold, in the first fiction film of the Greek Cinema (The Adventures of Villar, 1924, Joseph Hepp), is a wedding reception at the hill of Acropolis. Then, during the interwar period, film pro- duction comprises of documentaries depicting the “Celebrations of the Third Greek Civilisation”, romances from late antiquity (where the beauty of the lovers refers to An- cient Greek statues), and, finally, the first filmings of a theatrical performance, Del- phic Celebrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Voting Gap in the Dawn of Urbanization: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment with Greek Special Elections
    GreeSE Papers Hellenic Observatory Discussion Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe Paper No. 146 Gender voting gap in the dawn of urbanization: evidence from a quasi-experiment with Greek special elections Georgios Efthyvoulou, Pantelis Kammas and Vassilis Sarantides March 2020 Gender voting gap in the dawn of urbanization: evidence from a quasi-experiment with Greek special elections Georgios Efthyvoulou, Pantelis Kammas and Vassilis Sarantides GreeSE Paper No. 146 Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Hellenic Observatory or the LSE © Georgios Efthyvoulou, Pantelis Kammas and Vassilis Sarantides Contents Abstract_______________________________________________________________ii 1. Introduction ________________________________________________________1 2. Theoretical considerations_____________________________________________5 2.1 Gender gap in political preferences and the effect of female labour force participation_________________________________________________________5 2.2 The U-shaped relationship between economic development and female labour force participation____________________________________________________6 2.3 Greece in the dawn of urbanization: The case of an economy in transition____9 3. Empirical design____________________________________________________10 3.1 Data and variables _______________________________________________10 3.2 Empirical model specification_______________________________________15
    [Show full text]
  • The Establishment and Development of the Metaxas Dictatorship in the Context of Fascism and Nazism, 1936–41
    23tmp09a.qxd 04/04/2002 14:43 Page 143 9 The Establishment and Development of the Metaxas Dictatorship in the Context of Fascism and Nazism, 193641 MOGENS PELT In October 1935, Italy launched a fully-fledged attack on Abyssinia, threatening Britains position in Egypt and the supremacy of the Royal Navy in the eastern Mediterranean. Three years later, in 1938, Germany established her dominance over Central Europe in a series of short-of-war operations, incorporating Austria and the Sudetenland into the Reich by Anschluss and the Munich agreement. The dismemberment of Czechoslovakia dealt a fatal blow to the French security system in south-eastern Europe, la petite entente with Prague serving as its regional power centre. While the credibility of France as a great power almost completely eroded overnight, Vienna and Prague suddenly provided ready-made platforms to an invigorated and resurgent Germany to project her power into south- eastern Europe, and to rearrange that area in line with Berlins plans for a new European Order. This, in turn, gave a boost to national vindication in the revisionist states, Bulgaria and Hungary, while it generated shock waves of national insecurity and internal instability in the status quo states, Greece, Romania and Yugoslavia. On 10 October 1935, only a week after the beginning of Mussolinis African enterprise, a military coup détat in Greece reinstated the monarchy, which had been abolished in the wake of the First World War, and some ten months later, on 4 August 1936, King George II established what was meant to be a permanent dictatorship under the leadership of General Ioannis Metaxas, a prominent royalist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cinema of Theo Angelopoulos Edited by Angelos Koutsourakis & Mark Stevens Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015
    FILMICON: Journal of Greek Film Studies ISSUE 4, December 2017 BOOK REVIEW The Cinema of Theo Angelopoulos edited by Angelos Koutsourakis & Mark Stevens Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015 Thanassis Vassiliou Université de Poitiers The collective volume The cinema of Theo Angelopoulos, edited by Angelos Koutsourakis and Mark Stevens, attempts to establish and highlight the reasons why the cinema of Theo Angelopoulos holds a very important position in the history of world cinema. The book comprises seventeen essays and is divided in four complementary parts: authorship, politics, poetics, and time. In the introduction of the book, discussion revolves around whether Theo Angelopoulos’s work, which starts in the late 1960s, can be interpreted through the prism of late-modernism as the oeuvre of one of the many significant directors who proved that cinema becomes universal when is deeply anchored in the traditions and the history of its country of origin. This, however, cannot be perceived only in positive terms. The critical reception of Angelopoulos’s work was often uneasy about the fact that his films are deeply imbricated in modern Greek history (p. 9). This uneasiness was further increased by the fact that Angelopoulos was always considered as a living anachronism. The editors aptly juxtapose the question of the position of Angelopoulos’s work in modern cinema with its critical reception, and before they pass the torch to the contributing authors, they make sure to offer a short synopsis of modern Greek history, necessary to the unacquainted readers. Ι. Authorship The five texts comprising the first part of the book approach Angelopoulos’s work through his formation as an author.
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity and the Structuring of the Public Domain in Kerala: a History of the Contemporary
    MASCULINITY AND THE STRUCTURING OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN IN KERALA: A HISTORY OF THE CONTEMPORARY Ph. D. Thesis submitted to MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION (MAHE – Deemed University) RATHEESH RADHAKRISHNAN CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF CULTURE AND SOCIETY (Affiliated to MAHE- Deemed University) BANGALORE- 560011 JULY 2006 To my parents KM Rajalakshmy and M Radhakrishnan For the spirit of reason and freedom I was introduced to… This work is dedicated…. The object was to learn to what extent the effort to think one’s own history can free thought from what it silently thinks, so enable it to think differently. Michel Foucault. 1985/1990. The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality Vol. II, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage: 9. … in order to problematise our inherited categories and perspectives on gender meanings, might not men’s experiences of gender – in relation to themselves, their bodies, to socially constructed representations, and to others (men and women) – be a potentially subversive way to begin? […]. Of course the risks are very high, namely, of being misunderstood both by the common sense of the dominant order and by a politically correct feminism. But, then, welcome to the margins! Mary E. John. 2002. “Responses”. From the Margins (February 2002): 247. The peacock has his plumes The cock his comb The lion his mane And the man his moustache. Tell me O Evolution! Is masculinity Only clothes and ornaments That in time becomes the body? PN Gopikrishnan. 2003. “Parayu Parinaamame!” (Tell me O Evolution!). Reprinted in Madiyanmarude Manifesto (Manifesto of the Lazy, 2006). Thrissur: Current Books: 78.
    [Show full text]