DOCSLIB.ORG

Atmospheric Neutrino Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atmospheric Neutrino Background Atmospheric Neutrino Background Hallsie Reno, University of Iowa PAHEN Berlin, SeptemBer 27, 2019 Supported in part by a US Department of Energy grant. Collaborators: I. Sarcevic, A. Bhattacharya, R. Enberg, A. Stasto, Y. S. Jeong, C. S. Kim, Weidong Bai Neutrinos produced in the atmosphere • background to the astrophysical flux • reflect the cosmic ray spectrum at Earth, not the spectrum at production (not the diffuse astrophysical spectrum) • depend on the cosmic Figure from https://astro.desy.de/ ray composition 2 Scaling by approximate Atmospheric neutrino flux CR energy spectrum “conventional flux” ⇡ – uncertainties in E2.7φ hadronic models, ⌫ differential cross sections K astrophysical “prompt flux” – D uncertainties in QCD charm production 2 E− cartoon E Pdecay(E)=1 exp( D/γc⌧) 1.7 1 φ 2.7 2 − − EGeV cm ssrGeV D/γc⌧ = E /E ⇠ 3 ' c Atmospheric flux IceCube, Astrophys. J. 833 (2016) 3 (1607.08006) IceCube,PRD 91, 12204 (2015) arXiv:1504.03753 4 Flavor ratios, anti/neutrinos of prompt flux Prompt flux from charm: ⌫e : ⌫µ : µ =1:1:1 + + D ` ⌫`X (16 17%) ⌫<latexit sha1_base64="lpBUjWWQth03CNGZdn0/1O+OtK4=">AAAB/HicbZDLSsNAFIZP6q3WW7RLN4NFcFUSESwFoeDGZQV7gSaUyXTSDp1MwsxECKG+ihsXirj1Qdz5Nk7bLLT1h4GP/5zDOfMHCWdKO863VdrY3NreKe9W9vYPDo/s45OuilNJaIfEPJb9ACvKmaAdzTSn/URSHAWc9oLp7bzee6RSsVg86CyhfoTHgoWMYG2soV31RNr0AixzAzN0g9ymO7RrTt1ZCK2DW0ANCrWH9pc3ikkaUaEJx0oNXCfRfo6lZoTTWcVLFU0wmeIxHRgUOKLKzxfHz9C5cUYojKV5QqOF+3six5FSWRSYzgjriVqtzc3/aoNUhw0/ZyJJNRVkuShMOdIxmieBRkxSonlmABPJzK2ITLDERJu8KiYEd/XL69C9rLtO3b2/qrUaRRxlOIUzuAAXrqEFd9CGDhDI4Ble4c16sl6sd+tj2Vqyipkq/JH1+QMgCJO5</latexit> :¯⌫ =1:1 ! − + + 0 + ⇡ µ ⌫ <latexit sha1_base64="YeRlA+1O4Ce2EKxEJidJG4ahZRc=">AAAB/3icbZDLSgMxFIYz9VbrbVRw4yZYBKFQZkSwy4IblxXsBTrTIZNm2tAkM+QilNqFr+LGhSJufQ13vo1pOwtt/SHw8Z9zyDl/nDGqtOd9O4W19Y3NreJ2aWd3b//APTxqqdRITJo4ZansxEgRRgVpaqoZ6WSSIB4z0o5HN7N6+4FIRVNxr8cZCTkaCJpQjLS1IvckyGivEugUBtz0KjAQJrIUuWWv6s0FV8HPoQxyNSL3K+in2HAiNGZIqa7vZTqcIKkpZmRaCowiGcIjNCBdiwJxosLJfP8pPLdOHyaptE9oOHd/T0wQV2rMY9vJkR6q5drM/K/WNTqphRMqMqOJwIuPEsOgPXcWBuxTSbBmYwsIS2p3hXiIJMLaRlayIfjLJ69C67Lqe1X/7qpcr+VxFMEpOAMXwAfXoA5uQQM0AQaP4Bm8gjfnyXlx3p2PRWvByWeOwR85nz/v5ZVd</latexit> µ D ` ⌫`X (6 7%) ! − Muon decays,! then 2:1 ratio )+: )-. !##" equal charm and anticharm Higher energies, muons don’t decay, but kaons contribute Isotropic flux for $ ≤ 10( GeV First opportunity to produce )*: E⌧ 0.9ED Ds ⌧⌫⌧ (5.5%) h i' ! 5 Spectrum weighted Z-moments 1 ⇥k(E0,X) dn(k j; E0,E) S(k j)= dE0 ! ! λ (E ) dE ZE k 0 ⇥k(E,X) S(k j)=Zkj(E) ! λk(E) 1 φk(E0,X) λk(E) dn(k j; E0,E) Z (E)= dE0 ! kj φ (E,X) λ (E ) dE ZE k k 0 Spectrum weights favor forward production of charm – want the largest E (charmed meson) given E’ (cosmic ray nucleon). Spectrum weighted Z-moments are used in approximate solutions to the coupled cascade equations of cosmic ray nucleons, charm particles, leptons from their decays. 6 Analytic approximation (AA) Cosmic ray – ⇤M = λM /(1 ZMM) low ZNMZM − φ = φN nucleon flux ⇡ 1 Z ✏c = 115 GeV − NN ✏K = 850 GeV Z Z ln(Λ /Λ ) M c ⇥high = NM M M N c ⇥ 1 Z 1 Λ /Λ E N ✏D 108 GeV − NN − N M c ⇠ • Exponential atmosphere (at one T), 1D, approximate factorization of depth dependence. • Gaisser et al., PoS, ICRC2019:893: Analytic approximation compared to numerical solution (MCEq, Fedynitch et al., PoS, ICRC2015:1129) is very good. • Angular distribution: factor of 1/cos!∗, also account for curvature of the Earth. Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics, T. Gaisser, Cambridge U Press; L. V. Volkova, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980); P. Lipari, Astropart. Phys. 1 (1993) 7 Perturbative charm pair production Refs: e.g., Thunman, Ingelman, Gondolo, Astropart. Phys. (1996) at LO, Pasquali, MHR, Sarcevic, Phys. Rev. D (1999) at NLO modeled with x dependent k-factor (PRS) LO expression for charm production: pdg.lbl.gov σ(pp ccX¯ ) dx1 dx2 G(x1,µ)G(x2,µ)ˆσGG cc¯(x1x2s) ! ' ! Z x ,x : 1 2 1 2 4Mcc¯ x1,2 = xF + xF xF = x1 x2 2 s ± ! − r x x = E/E0 7 6 F ' E E 10 GeV x2 10− x x 0.1,x 1 ⇠ ! ⇠ 1 ' F ⇠ 2 ⌧ 8 Charm production: three ways ln 1/' • NLO QCD evaluation of charm pair cross section and energy distribution with nuclear corrections (nCTEQ pdfs). Long history of theory of heavy flavor production. • Dipole Model: Soyez (form from approx. solution to nonlinear BK equation), Block et ln #$ al. approximation to F2 (phenomenological dipole cross section), Albacete et al. (AAMQS, From Gelis et al. rcBK). Multiple ways to include nuclear Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 463 corrections: Glauber-Gribov or A-dependent saturation scale. • kT factorization, low x off-shell gluon. Nuclear Nason, Dawson, Ellis, NP B303 (1988), effects through nonlinear term scaling like NP B373 (1992); Soyez, Phys. Lett. cube root of A. 655B (2007) 32, Albacete et al. Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 034031; Kutak and Sapeta, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 094043. 9 LHCb data to “calibrate” charm NLO perturbative for example, with a range of scale factors and dependence. For the prompt flux from charm, need even larger rapidities (more forward production). 1 pz y = tanh− E ! LHCb, Nucl. Phys. B 871 (2013) 1; JHEP 03 (2016) 159, Bhattacharya et al.,<latexit sha1_base64="Vrzd2oZOVUJLSdWQx8cbdkvrbEg=">AAACE3icbVDLSsNAFJ3UV62vqEs3g0WogiURQRcKRRFcVrAPaGqZTCfp0MkkzEyEGPIPbvwVNy4UcevGnX/jtM1CWw9cOJxzL/fe40aMSmVZ30Zhbn5hcam4XFpZXVvfMDe3mjKMBSYNHLJQtF0kCaOcNBRVjLQjQVDgMtJyh5cjv3VPhKQhv1VJRLoB8jn1KEZKSz3zIIHn0FGID+7SQztzLqjvswp0PIFwGvUesvRqIor9nlm2qtYYcJbYOSmDHPWe+eX0QxwHhCvMkJQd24pUN0VCUcxIVnJiSSKEh8gnHU05CojspuOfMrinlT70QqGLKzhWf0+kKJAyCVzdGSA1kNPeSPzP68TKO+2mlEexIhxPFnkxgyqEo4BgnwqCFUs0QVhQfSvEA6TjUDrGkg7Bnn55ljSPqrZVtW+Oy7WzPI4i2AG7oAJscAJq4BrUQQNg8AiewSt4M56MF+Pd+Ji0Fox8Zhv8gfH5A7GmnWk=</latexit> JHEP 1611(2016) 167 10 Examples: Dipole and kT factorization comparisons with LHCb data Dipole Uncertainty band: MF=mc – 4 mc kT factorization Uncertainty band: with and without saturation, kT limits LHCb, Nucl. Phys. B 871 (2013) 1; JHEP 03 (2016) 159, Bhattacharya et al., JHEP 1611(2016) 167 11 Atmospheric neutrino flux from charm broken power law Gaisser et al. CR parameterization Bhattacharya eta al, JHEP 1506 (2015) 110; Bhattacharya et al., JHEP 1611 (2016) 167 • Error band dictated in part by LHC experiment, in part by QCD uncertainties. • Two realistic cosmic ray spectra and composition, one simple cosmic ray parameterization (for comparison) and nuclear corrections (green). • Black: no nuclear corrections in target Nitrogen, all the rest include nuclear corrections. Nuclear corrections decrease result by 20-30%. 12 Atmospheric neutrino flux from charm • Conventional flux: vertical muon neutrinos plus antineutrinos. • Dipole model gives larger flux than perturbative calculation. • Black line: 0.54 ERS from Radel and Schoenen for IceCube, ICRC 2015 (2015) 1079. • Short green line: approximate IceCube limit Bhattacharya et al., JHEP 1611 (2016) 167 from Astrophys. J. 833 (2016) 3. Dipole model here compared to ERS: updated cosmic ray inputs, different Zpp , updated fragmentation fractions. 13 Comparison with other recent results Use the broken power law for comparison with recent results from other groups GMS: Garzelli, Moch and Sigl, JHEP 10 (2015) 115 using POWHEG BOX and Pythia; GRRST: Gauld et al, JHEP 02 (2016) 130 with different assessment of PDF uncertainties. See also Benzke, Garzelli, Kniehl, Kramer, Moch, Sigl, JHEP 1712 (2017) 021. 14 Prompt atmospheric tau neutrinos plus antineutrinos Tau neutrino flux about 1/10 of the muon neutrino flux Ds ⌧⌫⌧ ⌧ ⌫ X ! ! ⌧ Green band is from oscillation of conventional muon neutrinos, vertical to horizontal. Bhattacharya et al., JHEP 1611 (2016) 167 15 Other effects: intrinsic charm? Laha and Brodsky, PRD 96 (2017); See also, Halzen and Wille, arXiv: 1601.03044; PRD 94 (2016) Cross section scales in energy like pp cross section, not perturbative charm cross section. Connect atmospheric charm to lower energy intrinsic charm. Approximate IceCube limit (2016) Intrinsic charm would enhance forward charm production, therefore, also the prompt neutrino flux. 16 Intrinsic charm at SHiP? 400 GeV proton beam on a beam dump, designed to search for hidden sector particles. intrinsic charm: Alekhin et al, very forward Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) and has a weak Bai & Reno, JHEP02 (2019) 077 dependence on beam energy https://ship.web.cern.ch/ship/ Also production of tau neutrinos. Beam dump facility, 2027 17 DsTau Experiment at CERN 400 GeV protons on a thin tungsten target. Look for kinks in tracks in emulsion for !" → $ + &$ (1000 events accorDing to perturbative estimate). intrinsic charm perturbative Bai & Reno, JHEP02 (2019) 077 Pilot run in 2018, runs in 2021 & 2022 18 FASER experiment at CERN ForwArd Seach ExpeRiment for light extremely weakly-interacting particles. Result: there will be (very) forward production of charm and decays to neutrinos. arXiv:1901.04468 Approved for small detector to be installed during shutdown to be ready for Run 3. 19 Prompt atmospheric neutrino flux - perspectives • If we had a completely reliable calculation, we wouldn’t need three different approaches. • Charm mass close to the GeV scale is a problem • And small-x extrapolations below measured regime. • Nuclear corrections for nitrogen target can suppress the flux predictions by 20-35%. • Outlier PDFs give a much larger band of uncertainty in the prompt neutrino flux will appear, as shown by other authors. • Chances to measure forward charm: SHiP at low energy, FASER (FASER!) at the LHC could be another possibility. • Hadronic dependence – new tools to use, e.g., Dembinski et al., and Fedynitch et al., PoS (ICRC2017) 1019. MCEq: numerical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freeze-In Dark Matter from a Minimal B-L Model and Possible Grand
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 101, 115022 (2020) Freeze-in dark matter from a minimal B − L model and possible grand unification Rabindra N. Mohapatra1 and Nobuchika Okada 2 1Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA (Received 5 May 2020; accepted 5 June 2020; published 17 June 2020) We show that a minimal local B − L symmetry extension of the standard model can provide a unified description of both neutrino mass and dark matter. In our model, B − L breaking is responsible for neutrino masses via the seesaw mechanism, whereas the real part of the B − L breaking Higgs field (called σ here) plays the role of a freeze-in dark matter candidate for a wide parameter range. Since the σ particle is unstable, for it to qualify as dark matter, its lifetime must be longer than 1025 seconds implying that the B − L gauge coupling must be very small. This in turn implies that the dark matter relic density must arise from the freeze-in mechanism. The dark matter lifetime bound combined with dark matter relic density gives a lower bound on the B − L gauge boson mass in terms of the dark matter mass. We point out parameter domains where the dark matter mass can be both in the keV to MeV range as well as in the PeV range. We discuss ways to test some parameter ranges of this scenario in collider experiments. Finally, we show that if instead of B − L, we consider the extra Uð1Þ generator to be −4I3R þ 3ðB − LÞ, the basic phenomenology remains unaltered and for certain gauge coupling ranges, the model can be embedded into a five-dimensional SOð10Þ grand unified theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PBC-REPORT-2018-007 Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report J. Beacham1, C. Burrage2,∗, D. Curtin3, A. De Roeck4, J. Evans5, J. L. Feng6, C. Gatto7, S. Gninenko8, A. Hartin9, I. Irastorza10, J. Jaeckel11, K. Jungmann12,∗, K. Kirch13,∗, F. Kling6, S. Knapen14, M. Lamont4, G. Lanfranchi4,15,∗,∗∗, C. Lazzeroni16, A. Lindner17, F. Martinez-Vidal18, M. Moulson15, N. Neri19, M. Papucci4,20, I. Pedraza21, K. Petridis22, M. Pospelov23,∗, A. Rozanov24,∗, G. Ruoso25,∗, P. Schuster26, Y. Semertzidis27, T. Spadaro15, C. Vallée24, and G. Wilkinson28. Abstract: The Physics Beyond Colliders initiative is an exploratory study aimed at exploiting the full scientific potential of the CERN’s accelerator complex and scientific infrastructures through projects complementary to the LHC and other possible future colliders. These projects will target fundamental physics questions in modern particle physics. This document presents the status of the proposals presented in the framework of the Beyond Standard Model physics working group, and explore their physics reach and the impact that CERN could have in the next 10-20 years on the international landscape. arXiv:1901.09966v2 [hep-ex] 2 Mar 2019 ∗ PBC-BSM Coordinators and Editors of this Report ∗∗ Corresponding Author: [email protected] 1 Ohio State University, Columbus OH, United States of America 2 University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom 3 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto,
    [Show full text]
  • FASER: Forward Search Experiment at the LHC
    Input to the European Particle Physics Strategy Update 2018-2020 Submitted 18 December 2018 FASER FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC FASER Collaboration Akitaka Ariga, Tomoko Ariga, Jamie Boyd,∗ Franck Cadoux, David W. Casper, Yannick Favre, Jonathan L. Feng,y Didier Ferrere, Iftah Galon, Sergio Gonzalez-Sevilla, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Giuseppe Iacobucci, Enrique Kajomovitz, Felix Kling, Susanne Kuehn, Lorne Levinson, Hidetoshi Otono, Brian Petersen, Osamu Sato, Matthias Schott, Anna Sfyrla, Jordan Smolinsky, Aaron M. Soffa, Yosuke Takubo, Eric Torrence, Sebastian Trojanowski, and Gang Zhang Abstract FASER, the ForwArd Search ExpeRiment, is a proposed experiment dedicated to searching for light, extremely weakly-interacting particles at the LHC. Such particles may be produced in the LHC's high-energy collisions in large numbers in the far-forward region and then travel long distances through concrete and rock without interacting. They may then decay to visible particles in FASER, which is placed 480 m downstream of the ATLAS interaction point. In this work, we describe the FASER program. In its first stage, FASER is an extremely compact and inexpensive detector, sensitive to decays in a cylindrical region of radius R = 10 cm and length L = 1:5 m. FASER is planned to be constructed and installed in Long Shutdown 2 and will collect data during Run 3 of the 14 TeV LHC from 2021-23. If FASER is successful, FASER 2, a much larger successor with roughly R ∼ 1 m and L ∼ 5 m, could be constructed in Long Shutdown 3 and collect data during the HL-LHC era from 2026-35.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    WIN2019 The 27th International Workshop on Weak Interactions and Neutrinos. Sunday 02 June 2019 - Saturday 08 June 2019 Bari Book of Abstracts Contents On the interpretation of astrophysical neutrinos ....................... 1 Final results of the CUPID-0 Phase I experiment ....................... 1 The SHiP experiment at CERN ................................. 2 Results from the CUORE experiment ............................. 2 Study of TeV neutrinos in the FASER experiment at the LHC ................ 3 Physics prospects of JUNO ................................... 3 Study of tau-neutrino production at the CERN SPS ..................... 4 Design and Status of the JUNO Experiment .......................... 4 Probing New Physics with Germanium Detectors having sub-keV Sensitivity . 5 The Belle II experiment: early physics and prospect ..................... 5 Directional Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Emulsion ................... 6 Global fit to νµ disappearance data with sterile neutrinos .................. 6 Measurement of the neutron capture cross section on argon with ACED . 7 Status of the search for neutrinoless double-beta decay with GERDA ........... 7 Status of investigations of neutrino properties with the vGEN spectrometer at Kalinin Nu- clear Power Plant ...................................... 8 Relic neutrinos: clustering and consequences for direct detection ............. 8 The ENUBET project ...................................... 9 Atmospheric neutrino spectrum reconstruction with JUNO . 10 Dark Matter searches with Neutrino
    [Show full text]
  • ECFA Newsletter #6
    ECFA Newsletter #6 Following the Plenary ECFA meeting, 19 and 20 November 2020 https://indico.cern.ch/event/966397/ Winter 2020 It was a great pleasure for ECFA to endorse the membership of the ECFA Early-Career Research Panel at its meeting on 19 November 2020. The panel, made up mainly of PhD students and postdocs, will discuss all aspects that contribute in a broad sense to the future of the research field of particle physics. To capture what is on their minds and to estaBlish a dialogue with ECFA members, a delegation of early-career researchers will Be invited to Plenary and Restricted ECFA, while the panel will also advise and inform ECFA through regular reports. During the Plenary ECFA meeting, we heard about the progress in developing the Accelerator and Detector R&D Roadmaps. The European Strategy for Particle Physics (ESPP) calls on ECFA to develop a detector R&D roadmap to support proposals at European and national levels, and to achieve the ESPP objectives in a timely manner. The ECFA roadmap panel will develop the roadmap taking into consideration the targeted R&D projects required, as well as transformational Blue-sky R&D relevant to the ESPP. Open symposia, in March or April 2021, are part of the consultation with the community. In parallel, with a view to stepping up accelerator R&D, the European Laboratory Directors Group (LDG) is developing an accelerator R&D roadmap that takes into account a variety of technologies for further development during this decade. The roadmap will set the course for R&D and technology demonstrators to enaBle the development of future facilities that support the scientific objectives of the ESPP.
    [Show full text]
  • NCBJ Annual Report 2018
    NARODOWE CENTRUM BADAŃ JĄDROWYCH NATIONAL CENTRE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH ANNUAL REPORT 2018 1 LOCATIONS Main site: 30 km from Warsaw 7 A.Sołtana street 05-400 Otwock-Świerk Warsaw site: (divisions BP1, BP2, BP3, BP4) 7 Pasteura street, 02-093 Warsaw Łódź site: (division BP4) 28 Płk. Strzelców Kaniowskich 69, 90-558 Łódź Editors: N. Keeley A. Malinowska Technical editors: G. Swiboda __________________________________________________________________________________________ PL-05-400 Otwock-Świerk, POLAND tel.: 048 22 273 10 01 fax: 048 22 779 34 81 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.ncbj.gov.pl ISSN 2299-2960 2 CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT OF THE INSTITUTE ............................................................................................................. 5 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL ...................................................................................................................................... 5 DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS OF THE INSTITUTE ............................................................................... 7 MAIN RESEARCH ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................................... 8 SCIENTIFIC STAFF OF THE INSTITUTE ...................................................................................................... 10 PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Grant projects for young Scientists ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forward Search Experiment at the LHC
    FASER ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC Sebastian Trojanowski National Centre for Nuclear Research, Poland (& UC Irvine) New Physics with Displaced Vertices NCTS, Hsinchu, 21 June 2018 (FASER group see https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/FASER/WebHome) arXiv:1708.09389, 1710.09387, 1801.08947, 1806.02348 (with J.L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling) FASER OUTLINE • Motivation and idea of the FASER experiment • Location of the experiment • Detector layout • Models of new physics in FASER -- dark photons, -- dark Higgs bosons + invisible decays of the SM Higgs, -- heavy neutral leptons at GeV scale, -- axion-like particles, -- inelastic dark matter. • Background: simulations & in-situ measurements • Conclusions 2 FASER MOTIVATION AND IDEA ● Traditionally, new physics particles have been searched for in the high-pT region Focus on heavy and strongly-coupled particles, e.g., Higgs, SUSY, extra dim, … 7 -1 σ ~ fb – pb, e.g., NH ~ 10 at 300 fb energy frontier ● However, light and weakly-coupled new particles typically escape such detection, they can be produced e.g. in rare meson decays, and typically go in the far forward region pT ~ ΛQCD, θ ~ ΛQCD /E ~ mrad, new particles are highly collimated along the beam-axis ● FASER – newly proposed, small (~1 m3) and inexpensive (~1M$) detector to be placed few hundred meters downstream away from the ATLAS/CMS IP to harness large, currently „wasted” forward LHC cross section intensity frontier 17 -1 σinel ~ 75 mb, e.g., Nπ ~ 10 at 3 ab FASER new SM π, K, D, B, … physics LHCf, TOTEM, ALFA, CASTOR 3 FASER
    [Show full text]
  • CHIPP Roadmap for Research and Infrastructure 2025–2028 and Beyond by the Swiss Particle Physics Community IMPRINT
    Vol. 16, No. 6, 2021 swiss-academies.ch CHIPP Roadmap for Research and Infrastructure 2025–2028 and beyond by the Swiss Particle Physics Community IMPRINT PUBLISHER Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT) · Platform Mathematics, Astronomy and Physics (MAP) House of Academies · Laupenstrasse 7 · P.O. Box · 3001 Bern · Switzerland +41 31 306 93 25 · [email protected] · map.scnat.ch @scnatCH CONTACT Swiss Institute of Particle Physics (CHIPP) ETH Zürich · IPA · HPK E 26 · Otto-Stern-Weg 5 · 8093 Zürich Prof. Dr. Rainer Wallny · [email protected] · +41 44 633 40 09 · chipp.ch @CHIPP_news RECOMMENDED FORM OF CITATION Wallny R, Dissertori G, Durrer R, Isidori G, Müller K, Rivkin L, Seidel M, Sfyrla A, Weber M, Benelli A (2021) CHIPP Roadmap for Research and Infrastructure 2025–2028 and beyond by the Swiss Particle Physics Community Swiss Academies Reports 16 (6) SCNAT ROADMAPS COORDINATION Hans-Rudolf Ott (ETH Zürich) · Marc Türler (SCNAT) CHIPP ROADMAP EDITORIAL BOARD A. Benelli (secretary) · G. Dissertorib · R. Durrerd · G. Isidoric · K. Müllerc · L. Rivkina, g · M. Seidela, g · A. Sfyrlad R. Wallnyb (Chair) · M. Weberf CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS A. Antogninia, b · L. Baudisc · HP. Beckf · G. Bisona · A. Blondeld · C. Bottac · S. Braccinif · A. Bravard · L. Caminadaa, c F. Canellic · G. Colangelof · P. Crivellib · A. De Cosab · G. Dissertorib, M. Donegab · R. Durrerd · M. Gaberdielb · T. Gehrmannc T. Gollingd, C. Grabb · M. Grazzinic · M. Hildebrandta · M. Hoferichterf · B. Kilminstera · K. Kircha, b · A. Knechta · I. Kreslof B. Kruschee · G. Iacobuccid · G. Isidoric · M. Lainee · B. Laussa, M. Maggiored · F. Meiera · T. Montarulid · K. Müllerc A. Neronovd, 1 · A.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Reach of FASER, MATHUSLA, and Ship Towards Smaller Lifetimes Using Secondary Particle Production
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 101, 095020 (2020) Extending the reach of FASER, MATHUSLA, and SHiP towards smaller lifetimes using secondary particle production Krzysztof Jodłowski * National Centre for Nuclear Research, Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland † Felix Kling SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA ‡ Leszek Roszkowski Astrocent, Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland and National Centre for Nuclear Research, Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland Sebastian Trojanowski § Consortium for Fundamental Physics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom and National Centre for Nuclear Research, Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland (Received 8 January 2020; accepted 19 April 2020; published 15 May 2020) Many existing or proposed intensity-frontier search experiments look for decay signatures of light long- lived particles (LLPs), highly displaced from the interaction point, in a distant detector that is well-shielded from the Standard Model background. This approach is, however, limited to new particles with decay lengths similar to or larger than the baseline of those experiments. In this study, we discuss how this basic constraint can be overcome in non-minimal beyond standard model scenarios. If more than one light new particle is present in the model, an additional secondary production of LLPs may take place right in front of the detector, opening this way a new lifetime regime to be probed. We illustrate the prospects of such searches in the future experiments FASER, MATHUSLA, and SHiP, for representative models, emphasizing possible connections to dark matter or an anomalous magnetic moment of muon.
    [Show full text]
  • Cern 6/9/21, 11:02 Pm
    FASER catches first candidate collider neutrinos | CERN 6/9/21, 11:02 PM CERN Accelerating science (//home.cern) Sign in (/user/login) Directory (//cern.ch/directory) (/) (/news)(/news?News News Topic: Physics type=36 u) LVoir en français (/fr/news/news/physics/faser-catches-first-candidate-collider-neutrinos) FASER catches first candidate Related Articles V (/news/news/experiments/ls2-report-faser-jLS2 Report: FASER is collider neutrinos born) P born The result paves the way for studies of high-energy neutrinos at current and future (/news/news/experim particle colliders ents/ls2-report-faser- born) 2 JUNE, 2021 | By Ana Lopes (/authors/ana-lopes) Experiments | News | 24 March, 2021 expected to catch first (/news/news/physics/fasers-new-detector- expected-catch-first-collider-neutrino)... (/news/news/physics/f asers-new-detector- expected-catch-first- collider-neutrino) Physics | News | 17 December, 2019 (/news/news/experiments/faser-cern-(/news/news/experim approves-new-experiment-look-long-lived-ents/faser-cern- exotic-particles) approves-new- experiment-look-long- lived-exotic-particles) Experiments | News | 7 March, 2019 View all news (//cds.cern.ch/images/CERN-PHOTO-202103-038-13) The FASER experiment in the LHC tunnel. (Image: CERN) It’s a first at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), or indeed at any particle collider: the FASER collaboration has detected the first candidate particle interactions for neutrinos produced in LHC collisions. The result, described in a paper posted online (https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.06197), paves the way for studies of high-energy neutrinos at current and future colliders. Neutrinos are the most abundant fundamental particles that have mass in the universe, and they have been detected from many sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Activities in Line with LHEP Long Standing Tradition
    Antonio Ereditato AEC Plenary Meeting – Bern, 3 September 2019 Review of the AEC experimental activities In line with LHEP long standing tradition High-energy physics Neutrino Precision & oscillation physics astroparticle physics Interdisciplinary & Medical applications Development of novel various projects of particle physics particle detectors Today’s situation ATLAS (CERN) OPERA (Gran Sasso) EXO (USA) T2K (Japan) Xenon (Gran Sasso) MicroBooNE (USA) nEDM n2EDM (PSI) SBND (USA) Pulsed CNB (Bern) DUNE (USA) INSELSPITAL cyclotron Liquid Argon TPCs AEgIS (CERN) Novel radioisotopes Nuclear emulsions QPLAS Neutron beams Scintillators Muon radiography (Alps) Beam instrumentation TT-PET FASER (CERN) Irradiation studies DsTAU (CERN) Imaging and diagnostics The AEC Computing Center Gianfranco Sciacca • Very large computing center at UNIBE: 5000 CPU cores, 1 petabyte storage • ATLAS TIER2: in the first half of 2019, 1.5 million jobs with 8 million of CPUs used • Serving neutrino experiments, as well Mechanical and Electronics Workshops Roger Hänni Pascal Lutz Secretariat and Administration office Marcella Esposito Ursula Witschi Long list of scientific achievements ATLAS at the LHC (Michele Weber) ATLAS: recent scientific results Standard Model physics Top quark physics Hints for diboson production Measurement of ttV (Z,W) cross sections https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/STDM-2017-20/ Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 072009 Higgs physics Higgs physics Observation of Hàbb Observation of ttH production Phys. Lett. B 786 (2018) 59 Phys.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Proposal: Fasernu
    CERN-LHCC-2019-017, LHCC-P-015, UCI-TR-2019-25 <latexit sha1_base64="f8m+0QE2PoJPFiWPCwy3+9wDPGE=">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</latexit> FASER⌫⌫<latexit sha1_base64="f8m+0QE2PoJPFiWPCwy3+9wDPGE=">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</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="f8m+0QE2PoJPFiWPCwy3+9wDPGE=">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</latexit>
    [Show full text]