Tjuottjudusplána Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tjuottjudusplána Management Plan Tjuottjudusplána Management plan Regulations and Maintenance Plan for the National Parks Sarek Stora Sjöfallet/Stuor Muorkke Muddus/Muttos Padjelanta/Badjelánnda Regulations and Maintenance Plan for the Nature Reserves Sjávnja/Sjaunja Stubbá TJUOTTJUDUSPLÁNA • FÖRVALTNINGSPLAN 1 2 TJUOTTJUDUSPLÁNA • FÖRVALTNINGSPLAN Table of contents 1. A New Management and a Comprehensive Management Plan ................................ 5 1.1 Objectives of the Management Plan ................................................................................. 7 1.2 Established Demands on the Management Plan and Maintenance Plan ......................... 7 1.3 Outline of the Management Plan ..................................................................................... 8 1.4 The Task of the County Administrative Board and the Range of the Management Plan .. 8 1.5 Criteria for World Heritage Appointment – Objectives and Obligations ........................... 9 1.6 The Extent of Reindeer Husbandry Rights and Sámi Self-determination ........................ 10 1.7 The Right of Public Access and its Extent ........................................................................ 13 1.8 Other Rights within Laponia ........................................................................................... 14 1.9 International Instruments and Swedish Commitments .................................................. 14 1.10 The Laponia Process 2006 - 2011.................................................................................... 15 1.11 Starting-points for the New Management ...................................................................... 16 1.12 Evaluation of the Management Plan and Management Organization ............................ 22 1.13 Validity Period of the Management Plan ........................................................................ 22 2. People and Landscape – Nature and Usage .............................................................23 2.1 Characteristics of National Parks, Nature Reserves and other Areas .............................. 24 2.2 The Living Sámi Culture and Reindeer Industry .............................................................. 34 2.3 The Historical Heritage Arising from Previous Usage of the Land ................................... 41 2.4 The Natural Landscape in Laponia .................................................................................. 51 2.5 Infrastructure for Locals, Land-users and Visitors. .......................................................... 65 3. Laponia is Protected ...............................................................................................74 3.1 Forms of Protection and Conservation ........................................................................... 74 3.2. National and Regional Environmental Objectives ........................................................... 81 3.3 Environmental Objectives of the Sámi Parliament.......................................................... 83 3.4 Control Instruments for the Management ...................................................................... 83 4. Maintenance Plan ...................................................................................................90 4.1 Tools and Methods .......................................................................................................... 90 4.2 The Natural Landscape of Laponia ................................................................................ 102 4.3 The Historical Heritage Arising from Previous Usage of the Land ................................. 107 4.4 The Living Sámi Culture and Reindeer Husbandry ........................................................ 109 4.5 Infrastructure for Locals, Land-users and Visitors ......................................................... 111 Appendix Appendix 1 Regulations ......................................................................................................125 Appendix 2 Check List for Assessment According to the Horizontal Criteria ......................130 Appendix 3 Guidelines – Handling of Visits ........................................................................140 Appendix 4 Conventions and Other International Instruments which Imply Commitments for Sweden for the Management of Laponia .................142 TJUOTTJUDUSPLÁNA • FÖRVALTNINGSPLAN 3 Administrative Data National parks Sarek (1909), Stora Sjöfallet/Stuor Muorkke (1909), Muddus/Muttos (1942) and Padjelanta/Badjelánnda (1962) Nature reserves Sjávnja (1986), Stubbá (1988) and the Tjuoldavuobme (part of Huhttán-Gables/Kvik- kjokk-Kabla 2000) Other areas Ráhpaäno suorgudahka (Lájtávrre delta), Tjuoldavuobme and Sulidälbmá Referece- Munici- Surface Position Name Established number pality areal (SWEREF99) Padjelanta/Badjelánnda 1220 1962-05-09 Jokkmokk 200 233 ha 7478537 572941 Sarek 1221 1909-05-24 Gällivare 198 658 ha 7469126 Jokkmokk 613007 Stora Sjöfallet/Stuor 1219 1909-05-24 Jokkmokk 128 056 ha 7500067 Muorkke 622277 Muddus/Muttos 1223 1942-03-24 Gällivare 51 166 ha 7433015 Jokkmokk 725402 Sjávnja 1071 1986-03-07 Gällivare 281 459 ha 7487983 684481 Stubbá 850 1988-05-10 Gällivare 33 409 ha 7451837 1996-05-24 717633 (rev) Huhttán-Gables/ 1050 2000-04-28 Jokkmokk 49 114 ha 7434093 Kvikkjokk-Kabla 628535 Nature Reserve (part of) Laponia is included in the physical geographical regions 36 (a and b) Nordland, Troms and Lapland alpine region, 52 (a) Northern coniferous Lapland and 32 (c and d) Northern Norr- land and northern Finland coniferous areas. Laponia joined the list of the World’s Cultural and Natural Heritages at the 20th session of the World Heritage Committee on December 2-7 1996 in Mérida, Mexico. Laponia was inscribed on the basis of natural criteria (vii), (viii) and (ix) and the cultural criteria (iii) and (v). The World Heritage includes, aside from the above mentioned national parks and nature reserves, the Lájtávrre delta (1 919 ha), the western Tjoulda valley (19 830 ha) and the Sulidälbmá area (21 868 ha). In total, Laponia covers an area of 936 597 hectares. La- ponia - The Laponian Area – has the serial ID number 774 in the World Heritage List with the following sub-divisions and serial ID numbers. Padjelanta/Badjelánnda National Park 774-1, Sarek National Park 774-2, Stora Sjöfallet/Stuor Muorkke National Park 774-3, Sjávnja Nature Reserve 774-4, Stubbá Nature Reserve 774-5, Muddus/Muttos National Park 774-6, Sulidälbmá glacier area 774-7, Ráhpa valley delta land 774-8 and Tjuolda valley area 774-9. Laponia affects the mountain Sámi village organizations Jåhkågaska tjiellde, Luok- ta-Mávas, Tuorpon, Sirges, Unna tjerusj and Baste čearru and the forest Sámi village organi- zations Gällivare skogssameby, Slakka and Udtja. 4 TJUOTTJUDUSPLÁNA • FÖRVALTNINGSPLAN Rijddeljávrre. Photo Jan Erik Nilsson 1. A New Management and a Comprehensive Management Plan From a height on a high mountain A sight hard to tell about (Paulus Utsi) The Laponian World Heritage is more than just a landscape with high natural value, in which the indigenous Sámi people have lived and worked for generations. Laponia is more than the historical traces in the landscape, reminding us about those who lived here before us. Laponia is more than just a landscape, which would have a partly different appearance without the impact on biodiversity due to the grazing of reindeer. Laponia contains all of these landscapes. Laponia is also the image of landscapes that we carry within us, independent of our back- ground. The Sámi people – who traditionally, with respect and caution, have taken care of land and water in a way that preserves resources for future users – carry within themselves their mental landscapes. The visitors, looking for a place to rest at the end of their long jour- ney, carry within themselves images of their landscape. The conservationist sees a landscape TJUOTTJUDUSPLÁNA • FÖRVALTNINGSPLAN 5 where the natural conditions and the historically low intensive land use have provided con- ditions for high natural values. Laponia is all of these landscapes – and many more. Conservation work has a long history in Sweden. The origin of cultural heritage conser- vation can be traced back to the mid-17th century, and Swedish nature conservation turned 100 years old in 2009. However, there were different driving forces behind the birth of nature and culture conservation. While cultural heritage conservation started as a way to raise the kingdom’s reputation and reach the same level as other great powers of Europe, the foun- dation for nature conservation was to protect nature against man, who through industria- lization was seen as a threat to that which was considered original and native. There was a strong nationalistic spirit in both nature and culture conservation. For a long time the ideas behind nature conservation thought of humankind as a problem, with the focus set on pre- servation – not sustainable management. For a long time politics were shaped only by the aspect of nature protection, while management was not prioritized. When the first national parks were established at the beginning of the 20th century, it took place during a time when the viewpoints of individual people were not very important. The homesteader on Ängsö or the reindeer herder in Laponia did not have the possibility to influence what kind of protection was given. At the same time it was the people who had used the land for long periods of time who had contributed to shape the areas that were to be protected, and to a great extent
Recommended publications
  • Vol. 5 • No. 2 • 2011
    Vol. 5 • No. 2 • 2011 Published by Umeå University & The Royal Skyttean Society Umeå 2011 The Journal of Northern Studies is published with support from The Royal Skyttean Society and Umeå University © The authors and Journal of Northern Studies ISSN 1654-5915 Cover picture Scandinavia Satellite and sensor: NOAA, AVHRR Level above earth: 840 km Image supplied by METRIA, a division of Lantmäteriet, Sweden. www.metria.se NOAA®. ©ESA/Eurimage 2001. ©Metria Satellus 2001 Design and layout Leena Hortéll, Ord & Co i Umeå AB Fonts: Berling Nova and Futura Paper: Invercote Creato 260 gr and Artic volume high white 115 gr Printed by Davidsons Tryckeri AB, Växjö Contents / Sommaire / Inhalt Editors & Editorial board . 5 Contributors. 7 Articles /Aufsätze Marianne Liliequist & Lena Karlsson, Elderly Sami as the “Other”. Discourses on the Elderly Care of the Sami, 1850–1930 . .9 Frank Möller, “Wild Weirdness?” “Gross Humbugs!” Memory-Images of the North and Finnish Photography . 29 Kjell Sjöberg, River Lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis (L.) Fishing in the Area around the Baltic Sea . 51 Sabira Ståhlberg & Ingvar Svanberg, Catching Basking Ide, Leuciscus idus (L.), in the Baltic Sea. Fishing and Local Knowledge in the Finnish and Swedish Archipelagos . 87 Reviews/Comptes rendus/Besprechungen Karen Langgård & Kirsten Thisted (eds.), From Oral Tradition to Rap. Literatures of the Polar North, Nuuk: Ilismatusarfik/Forlaget Atuagkat 2011 Anne( Heith) . 105 Håkan Rydving, Tracing Sami Traditions. In Search of the Indigenous Religion among the Western Sami during the 17th and 18th Centuries (Instituttet for sammenlignende kultur- forskning, Serie B, Skrifter 135), Oslo: The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, Novus forlag 2010 (Olle Sundström).
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Centre Annual Report 2011 University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland
    ARCTIC CENTRE ANNUAL REPORT 2011 UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND, ROVANIEMI, FINLAND 1 CONTENT From the Director 3 Research 4 Education 6 Science Centre 8 Science Communications 10 Library 11 EU Arctic Information Centre 12 Administration 13 Events 17 Publications 19 Expert Memberships 29 Contact Information 32 COVER PHOTOS: Arctic Market Days in December 2011, photo by Jussi Arctic Black Gold Exhibition, photo by Marjo Portaankorva Laukkanen Researcher Nuccio Mazzullo, photo by Jussi Mapping the bear rituals of Khanty people on the river Portaankorva Ob, photo by Markku Heikkilä Christmas party organized by Science Centre, photo by Scientific Advisory Board meets the staff, photo by Marjo Laukkanen Arto Vitikka. Arktikum in April, photo by Arto Vitikka Field work on Yamal Peninsula, photo by Hanna Strengell. 2 FROM THE DIRECTOR This annual report tells what the Arctic Centre of positive development of the initiative, which has the University of Lapland has done during the been closely monitored nationally and year 2011. Figures and facts paint a picture of a internationally, mirrors how strongly Arctic issues dynamic and active Arctic scientific impact and have become a focus of global geo-political, outreach expertise and highly professional economical and environmental interest. teamwork that contain much to be proud of. All professors, researchers, students, science Indeed, the Arctic Centre’s multidisciplinary and communication and science centre experts multifunctional combination of research, together with our professional office staff have education, science centre exhibition and achieved great results again this year. communication is a unique concept in the circumpolar context. This breadth of the activities The result statistics can be found from this of the Arctic Centre enables it to seek a holistic annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Almanac • Nature Activities At
    The deeriNature Almanac What is the i in deeriNature? Is it information, internet? How about identification. When you go out on the Deer Isle preserves, what species are you almost certain to encounter? Which ones might you wish to identify? Then how do you organize your experience so that learning about the nearly overwhelming richness of nature becomes wonderfully satisfying? A century ago every farmer, medicine woman, and indeed any educated man or woman felt that they should have a solid knowledge of the plants around them. The Fairbanks Museum in St. Johnsbury, Vermont has maintained a Flower Table with labeled specimens since 1905. The Deer Isle-Stonington Historical Society has an antique herbarium collection made by Ada Southworth, a Dunham’s point rusticator. Today there are lovely field guides galore but the equivalent of a local list can come to you now by digital download. Here is an almanac, a list of likely plant and animal species (and something about rocks too) for our Deer Isle preserves, arranged according to season and habitat. Enjoy this free e-Book on your desktop, tablet or smartphone. Take this e-book with you on the trails and consult the Point of Interest signs. If you have a smartphone and adequate coverage, at some preserves a QR code will tell you more at the Points of Interest. After each category on the lists you will find suggestions for books to consult or acquire. You will have to read the on line reviews for apps as that field is developing too rapidly for any other approach.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report of Brambling Fringilla Montifringilla from Mandala Road, Arunachal Pradesh Qupeleio De Souza
    136 Indian BirDS VOL. 10 NO. 5 (PUBL. 2 NOVEMBER 2015) and the Middle East (Ali & Ripley 1986). However, observations of the Rosy Starling in the sub-Himalayan or Himalayan areas are very rare (please see distribution map in Grimmett et al. 2011: 404). Published bird checklists, relevant to the Doon Valley in particular (Pandey et al. 1994; Mohan 1996; Singh 2000), and for similar landscapes in the region (Sharma et al. 2003) have no record of the Rosy Starling. The bird is also not listed in the official checklist of birds published by the Uttarakhand Forest Department (Mohan & Sinha 2003). Hence, according to the best of my knowledge, this species has never been observed in Uttarakhand and this sighting is a new record for the state. Since only a single individual was seen of this otherwise highly gregarious bird, it is likely that the Rosy Starling I observed was a vagrant. Acknowledgements I am grateful to Mohammed Bashir for assistance in field, and Soumya Prasad for support. Photo: Raman Kumar References Ali, S., & Ripley, S. D., 1986. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Cuckoo-shrikes to babaxes. 2nd (Hardback) ed. Delhi: (Sponsored by Bombay Natural History Society.) Oxford University Press. Vol. 5 of 10 vols. Pp. i–xvi, 1–278+2+8 ll. 126. Rosy Starling feeding on Mallotus sp. tree, Doon Valley. Champion, H. G., & Seth, S. K., 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Government of India, Delhi. Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., & Inskipp, T., 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Okanogan County Plant List by Scientific Name
    The NatureMapping Program Washington Plant List Revised: 9/15/2011 Okanogan County by Scientific Name (1) Non- native, (2) ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 3 Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae 800 Alisma graminium Narrowleaf waterplantain Alismataceae 19 Alisma plantago-aquatica American waterplantain Alismataceae 1155 Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate pigweed Amaranthaceae 1087 Rhus glabra Sumac Anacardiaceae 650 Rhus radicans Poison ivy Anacardiaceae 1230 Berula erecta Cutleaf water-parsnip Apiaceae 774 Cicuta douglasii Water-hemlock Apiaceae 915 Cymopteris terebinthinus Turpentine spring-parsley Apiaceae 167 Heracleum lanatum Cow parsnip Apiaceae 1471 Ligusticum canbyi Canby's lovage Apiaceae 991 Ligusticum grayi Gray's lovage Apiaceae 709 Lomatium ambiguum Swale desert-parsley Apiaceae 1475 Lomatium brandegei Brandegee's lomatium Apiaceae 573 Lomatium dissectum Fern-leaf biscuit-root Apiaceae Coeur d'Alene desert- Lomatium farinosum Apiaceae 548 parsley 582 Lomatium geyeri Geyer's desert-parsley Apiaceae 586 Lomatium gormanii Gorman's desert-parsley Apiaceae 998 Lomatium grayi Gray's desert-parsley Apiaceae 999 Lomatium hambleniae Hamblen's desert-parsley Apiaceae 609 Lomatium macrocarpum Large-fruited lomatium Apiaceae 1476 Lomatium martindalei Few-flowered lomatium Apiaceae 1000 Lomatium nudicaule Pestle parsnip Apiaceae 1477 Lomatium piperi Piper's bisciut-root Apiaceae 634 Lomatium triternatum Nine-leaf lomatium Apiaceae 1528 Osmorhiza berteroi Berter's sweet-cicely
    [Show full text]
  • Networks and Alliances
    THE CONTEMPORARY ART DAYS SUMMIT 2018 NETWORKS AND ALLIANCES samtidskonstdagarna.se/en 14–16 November 2018 Boden/Luleå 13 November Pre-summit visit to Kiruna The Contemporary Art Days is the annual contemporary art summit that brings together art professionals from across Sweden and other countries to discuss current issues for art organisations. In 2018, for the first time, the summit is organised under the aegis of the Public Art Agency Sweden. This year’s summit will focus on building networks and alliances as strate- gies for action in contemporary art organisations today. The last few years have witnessed a large increase in organisational networks across the art field in Sweden. Whether formal or informal, on a local or national scale, with Nordic or international counterparts, alliances are formed in a variety of constellations between art institutions, self-organised initiatives and other organisations. Are these networks signs of the signature strategy of the neoliberal working world? Or are they responses of mutual support and solidarity by small and mid-size art organisations in the changing political landscape and precarious economic conditions? Or are today’s networks merely new forms of age old tools for building assemblies around mutual concerns? The Contemporary Art Days 2018 presents a diverse programme comprising guest speakers, performances, site visits and workshops that will examine a variety of ways of working with networks and building strategic alliances. The summit is held in the region of Norrbotten in the north of Sweden. A preview of the 2018 Luleå Biennial is included in the programme, as well as a pre-summit site visit to Kiruna, a mining town that is being relocated and rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Alpine Vascular Flora of the Teton Range, Wyoming, with Notes on Biology and Habitat Preferences
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 41 Number 2 Article 11 6-30-1981 A checklist of the alpine vascular flora of the Teton Range, Wyoming, with notes on biology and habitat preferences John R. Spence Utah State University Richard J. Shaw Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Spence, John R. and Shaw, Richard J. (1981) "A checklist of the alpine vascular flora of the Teton Range, Wyoming, with notes on biology and habitat preferences," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 41 : No. 2 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol41/iss2/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE ALPINE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE TETON RANGE, WYOMING, WITH NOTES ON BIOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCES Shaw^ John R. Spence''^ and Richard J. Abstract.— A checkHst of the vascular flora of the alpine zone (treeless vegetation above 9500 feet or 2900 m) of the Teton Range is presented. For each of the 216 species, si.x attributes are listed: flower color and shape, pollina- tion mode, life form, habitat preference, and whether each species is found in the Arctic. White and yellow flowered species are most common, and zoophilous species greatly predominate over anemophilous and apomictic species. Perennial/biennial herbs are the most common life form.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestings of Some Passerine Birds in Western Alaska
    64 Vol. 50 NESTINGS OF SOME PASSERINE BIRDS IN WESTERN ALASKA By LAWRENCE H. WALKINSHAW On May 25, 1946, John J. Stophlet, Jim Walkinshaw and.the writer reached Fair- banks, Alaska, bound for Bethel near the mouth of the Kuskokwim River, on the Bering Sea coast. Floods prevented landing at the air field at Bethel and our plane turned back to McGrath, 275 miles up-river. Bethel finally was reached by boat on June 1 and on June 4 w,e were flown to a cabin 30 miles to the west on the Johnson River. This river originates north and east of Bethel between the Yukon and Kuskokwim rivers and flows into the Kuskokwim about 30 miles below Bethel. Breeding birds were observed extensively, especially at the Johnson River locality, where we were stationed from June 4 to 22. Particularly favorable opportunities were presented to observe and photograph the nests of Yellow Wagtails, Redpolls and Tree Sparrows among the passerine birds of the area. Our notes on these speciesare presented ’ ’ herewith. Motacilla flava dascensis. Yellow Wagtail. On a short trip into the tundra northwest of Bethel, on June 2, we observed eight individuals, all males, and all singing. In 165 hours afield at Johnson River 153 individuals were counted. Each male was strongly territorial, defending its area against other male wagtails. Above the territory he gave his aerial song, but he also had song perches. If we appeared on a territory the male flew to meet us, coming to a spot about 8 to 15 meters overhead where he continued to scold while we were in close proximity of the nest area, This .
    [Show full text]
  • Rejection Behavior by Common Cuckoo Hosts Towards Artificial Brood Parasite Eggs
    REJECTION BEHAVIOR BY COMMON CUCKOO HOSTS TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL BROOD PARASITE EGGS ARNE MOKSNES, EIVIN ROSKAFT, AND ANDERS T. BRAA Departmentof Zoology,University of Trondheim,N-7055 Dragvoll,Norway ABSTRACT.--Westudied the rejectionbehavior shown by differentNorwegian cuckoo hosts towardsartificial CommonCuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs. The hostswith the largestbills were graspejectors, those with medium-sizedbills were mostlypuncture ejectors, while those with the smallestbills generally desertedtheir nestswhen parasitizedexperimentally with an artificial egg. There were a few exceptionsto this general rule. Becausethe Common Cuckooand Brown-headedCowbird (Molothrus ater) lay eggsthat aresimilar in shape,volume, and eggshellthickness, and they parasitizenests of similarly sizedhost species,we support the punctureresistance hypothesis proposed to explain the adaptivevalue (or evolution)of strengthin cowbirdeggs. The primary assumptionand predictionof this hypothesisare that somehosts have bills too small to graspparasitic eggs and thereforemust puncture-eject them,and that smallerhosts do notadopt ejection behavior because of the heavycost involved in puncture-ejectingthe thick-shelledparasitic egg. We comparedour resultswith thosefor North AmericanBrown-headed Cowbird hosts and we found a significantlyhigher propor- tion of rejectersamong CommonCuckoo hosts with graspindices (i.e. bill length x bill breadth)of <200 mm2. Cuckoo hosts ejected parasitic eggs rather than acceptthem as cowbird hostsdid. Amongthe CommonCuckoo hosts, the costof acceptinga parasiticegg probably alwaysexceeds that of rejectionbecause cuckoo nestlings typically eject all hosteggs or nestlingsshortly after they hatch.Received 25 February1990, accepted 23 October1990. THEEGGS of many brood parasiteshave thick- nestseither by grasping the eggs or by punc- er shells than the eggs of other bird speciesof turing the eggs before removal. Rohwer and similar size (Lack 1968,Spaw and Rohwer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Concept Paper: World Heritage Site Manager Workshop, Denmark 21 24 April 2009 Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit
    Draft Concept Paper: World Heritage Site Manager Workshop, Denmark 21 24 April 2009 Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit The Heritage Agency of Denmark has generously decided to host a workshop on the Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit (EoH). Representatives from all the Nordic sites are invited to attend. Nordic World Heritage Foundation will in cooperation with the Danish authorities organize this workshop in April 2009. The workshop is a result of the recommendations from the Periodic Reporting process. 1. Background and objectives The European Periodic Report was submitted to the World Heritage Committee at its 30th meeting in Vilnius 2006. The Nordic Baltic sub-regional report, annexed to the regional report, identifies a number of challenges for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention in the sub-region. Periodic Reporting is widely recognised as an important tool to strengthen and maintain the integrity and credibility of the World Heritage concept. The Periodic Reporting process has so far been successful in developing international cooperation and in providing an account of the status of World Heritage sites. This workshop follows the recommendations from the meeting between the Nordic and Baltic States Parties in 2007 (see Annex I Recommendations from the meeting on Periodic Reporting, Helsinki 3-4 May 2007 no: 6, 7 & 12). The World Heritage Committee will examine the Periodic Reporting follow-up activities for the European region at its 34th session in 2010. The Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit contains twelve practical tools. Although it has been developed with a focus on natural properties, the initiative also has potential value as a tool to assist site managers of cultural properties.
    [Show full text]