DOCSLIB.ORG

STRANGE MESON SPECTROSCOPY in Km and K$ at 11 Gev/C and CHERENKOV RING IMAGING at SLD *

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SLAC-409 UC-414 (E/I) STRANGE MESON SPECTROSCOPY IN Km AND K$ AT 11 GeV/c AND CHERENKOV RING IMAGING AT SLD * Youngjoon Kwon Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford, CA 94309 January 1993 Prepared for the Department of Energy uncer contract number DE-AC03-76SF005 15 Printed in the United States of America. Available from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. * Ph.D. thesis ii Abstract This thesis consists of two independent parts; development of Cherenkov Ring Imaging Detector (GRID) system and analysis of high-statistics data of strange meson reactions from the LASS spectrometer. Part I: The CIUD system is devoted to charged particle identification in the SLAC Large Detector (SLD) to study e+e- collisions at ,/Z = mzo. By measuring the angles of emission of the Cherenkov photons inside liquid and gaseous radiators, r/K/p separation will be achieved up to N 30 GeV/c. The signals from CRID are read in three coordinates, one of which is measured by charge-division technique. To obtain a N 1% spatial resolution in the charge- division, low-noise CRID preamplifier prototypes were developed and tested re- sulting in < 1000 electrons noise for an average photoelectron signal with 2 x lo5 gain. To help ensure the long-term stability of CRID operation at high efficiency, a comprehensive monitoring and control system was developed. This system contin- uously monitors and/or controls various operating quantities such as temperatures, pressures, and flows, mixing and purity of the various fluids. The results from the engineering run and initial physics run of the CRID in the SLD experiment show that the CRID hardware performs well and produces Cherenkov rings. Part II: Results from the partial wave analysis of strange meson final states in the reactions K-p + K-wp and K-p + rc$n are presented. The analyses are based on data from a 4.1 event/rib exposure of the LASS spectrometer in K-p interactions at 11 GeV/c. The data sample of K-wp final state contains N lo5 events, which is at least 25 times larger than in any other experiments. F’rom the partial wave analysis, . 111 resonance structures of Jp = 2-, 3- and 2+ amplitudes are observed in the Kw system. The analysis of 2- amplitudes provides an evidence for two strange meson states in the mass region around 1.75 GeV/c2. The 3- signal corresponding to Kj(1780) is observed to decay into Kw for the first time. A clear signal of the K;(1430) -+ Kw decay is also observed. The appropriate branching fractions are calculated and compared with the SU(3) predictions. The partial wave analysis of K’4 system favors Jp = l- and 2+ states in the 1.9 - 2.0 GeV/c2 region, but due to low statistics, the interpretation of partial waves in terms of resonance parameters is inconclusive. iv Acknowledgments For all this, I thank God, my Lord; only He has been, is, and will be the true source of my strength and inspiration. Although this thesis bears my name, it is essentially the work of many people. First and foremost, I would like to thank David Leith, my advisor, for all the helps that he provided me. When I first arrived at Stanford without knowing at all what detectors and accelerators are made of, he was kind enough to give me an opportunity to work in the SLAC Group B. Ever since, he has always been willing to offer me help and advice. He has always encouraged me to transcend the myoptic view of a graduate student and look deeply into and broadly over the fundamental problems of physics in whatever works I might be doing. He is certainly one of the models that I want to follow as a physicist, a teacher and a person. Blair Ratcliff first introduced me to the strange meson spectorscopy and sug- gested me to look into the Kw system regarding the unnatural spin-parity states. Bill Dunwoodie spent countless hours with me providing helps with all his insights on meson spectroscopy and analysis ideas. Dave Aston has always been willing to answer whatever silly questions I asked in computing and programming. Dick Bierce provided precisous help in managing data tapes. I am greatly indebted to Paschal Coyle and Greg Hallewell who guided me through many stages of my involvement in the SLD CRID project. Considering almost no experience in experimental physics that I had when I first arrived here, it is only an understatement that their helps were tremendously important for me to learn many aspects of R&D in building a detector system. I enjoyed observing all the ideas that Greg Hallewell provided to overcome the technical problems coming through. I learned a lot from Hideaki Kawahara with his expertise in electronics and hardware design. Don McShurley, Gerard Oxoby, Bob Reif and many other people provided me with technical assistances. I also received a lot of direct and indirect helps from former and current grad- uate students in SLAC Group B. Tim Bienz and Paul Rensing were very patient V and kind to teach me the basic techniques of programming and helped me over- come the threshold of a beginner. Tom Pave1 helped me a lot in the CRID project. Their enthusiasm, energy, and insights were something I can only envy. I feel very fortunate to have worked with them. I am also greatly indebted to Pekka Sinervo and Fred Bird, both former graduate students in Group B. Their experiences in analyzing the humongous data set of E-135, excellently documented in their dis- sertations, were invaluable assets throughout my analysis. I was lucky to have chances to meet them in person, whenever I had very crucial questions, which only they could answer. Lillian Vasillian and Eileen Brennan, Group B administrative assistants, have been very kind and very helpful in dealing with administrative materials, especially with the University. Without their helps, I should have had a lot more trouble in finishing this thesis. I appreciate the Korea Foundation for Advanced Studies (KFAS) as they par- tially supported my graduate study. Being a KFAS fellow provided me with op- portunities to meet many good friends through KFAS fellows’ meetings. If it were not for my parents, it would have been absolutely impossbile for me even to start this thesis, not to mention finish it. I feel very sorry for my father being no longer with us to see this work finished. I hope that now he can feel happier for his son, even in heaven. And, special thanks be to my mother. Her consistent support and prayer are something I can always count on. I am also grateful to my parent-in-laws for their support during the final year of my study. Although I mention it last, the contribution of Seungmin, my wife, to this thesis is at least as great as mine. She stopped her brilliant career in Korea as a reasearcher in psychology and education to become my wife and gave her heart and soul to support and encourage me to finish this work. Whatever she has done for me is something that I should remember and reward throughout my life. Therefore, it is only appropriate to dedicate this thesis to my mother and my wife. Contents Signature Abstract ii Acknowledgments iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Principles of Cherenkov Ring Imaging 5 2.1 Cherenkov Radiation . 5 2.2 Ring Imaging Devices . 8 2.2.1 Mirror Focusing . 8 2.2.2 Proximity Focusing . 9 3 SLD Cherenkov Ring Imaging Detector 12 3.1 SLD Overview. 12 3.2 Motivation for CRID . 15 3.3 Components of CRID . 17 3.3.1 Cherenkov Radiator ...................... 17 3.3.2 Drift Box ............................ 20 3.3.3 Mirrors ............................. 25 3.3.4 Electron Detector ........................ 25 3.3.5 Data Acquisition ........................ 26 3.3.6 Monitoring and Control .................... 28 vi CONTENTS 4 Low-noise Preamplifier for CRID 31 4.1 Low-noise Requirement for CRID Preamplifier ............ 31 4.2 FET amplifier noise model ....................... 33 4.2.1 Thermal noise .......................... 34 4.2.2 Shot noise ............................ 34 4.2.3 l/f noise ............................ 35 4.2.4 Total noise. ........................... 35 4.3 Noise Performance Test ......................... 36 4.3.1 Interchannel Crosstalk ..................... 36 4.3.2 Test system setup and results ................. 38 5 Monitor and Control Systems for CRID 49 5.1 Data acquisition for Monitor and control ............... 49 5.2 Monitoring and control of operating temperature .......... 50 5.3 Gas Delivery system and Pressure Control .............. 55 5.3.1 Pressure Control Tests on the Two-Cell Simulator. ..... 62 5.3.2 Pressure Control Tests on the CRID Prototype ....... 68 5.4 Binary Gas Mixture Monitoring using Sonar ............. 73 6 First Results from the SLD CRID 80 6.1 Commissioning of CRID . 80 6.2 Observation of the Cherenkov rings . 85 7 Introduction to Part II 90 8 The LASS Spectrometer 96 8.1 The Beamline .............................. 98 8.2 TheTarget ............................... 101 8.3 The Solenoid Region .......................... 102 8.3.1 The Cylindrical Chambers ................... 102 8.3.2 The Planar Chambers ..................... 103 8.3.3 The Cherenkov Counter Ci .................. 104 . CONTENTS Vlll 8.3.4 The Time of Flight System ................... 108 8.4 The Dipole Region ........................... 108 8.4.1 The Magnetostrictive Chambers ................ 111 8.4.2 The Proportional Chambers .................. 112 8.4.3 The Scintillator hodoscopes .................. 112 8.4.4 The Cherenkov Counter C2 .................. 113 8.5 The Event Trigger ........................... 113 8.5.1 The Beam Trigger Logic .................... 114 8.5.2 The Cluster Logic .......................
Recommended publications
  • Mesons Modeled Using Only Electrons and Positrons with Relativistic Onium Theory Ray Fleming Rayrfleming@Gmail.Com

    Mesons Modeled Using Only Electrons and Positrons with Relativistic Onium Theory Ray Fleming [email protected]

    All mesons modeled using only electrons and positrons with relativistic onium theory Ray Fleming [email protected] All mesons were investigated to determine if they can be modeled with the onium model discovered by Milne, Feynman, and Sternglass with only electrons and positrons. They discovered the relativistic positronium solution has the mass of a neutral pion and the relativistic onium mass increases in steps of me/α and me/2α per particle which is consistent with known mass quantization. Any pair of particles or resonances can orbit relativistically and particles and resonances can collocate to form increasingly complex resonances. Pions are positronium, kaons are pionium, D mesons are kaonium, and B mesons are Donium in the onium model. Baryons, which are addressed in another paper, have a non-relativistic nucleon combined with mesons. The results of this meson analysis shows that the compo- sition, charge, and mass of all mesons can be accurately modeled. Of the 220 mesons mod- eled, 170 mass estimates are within 5 MeV/c2 and masses of 111 of 121 D, B, charmonium, and bottomonium mesons are estimated to within 0.2% relative error. Since all mesons can be modeled using only electrons and positrons, quarks and quark theory are unnecessary. 1. Introduction 2. Method This paper is a report on an investigation to find Sternglass and Browne realized that a neutral pion whether mesons can be modeled as combinations of (π0), as a relativistic electron-positron pair, can orbit a only electrons and positrons using onium theory. A non-relativistic particle or resonance in what Browne companion paper on baryons is also available.
  • B2.IV Nuclear and Particle Physics

    B2.IV Nuclear and Particle Physics

    B2.IV Nuclear and Particle Physics A.J. Barr February 13, 2014 ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Nuclear 3 2.1 Structure of matter and energy scales . 3 2.2 Binding Energy . 4 2.2.1 Semi-empirical mass formula . 4 2.3 Decays and reactions . 8 2.3.1 Alpha Decays . 10 2.3.2 Beta decays . 13 2.4 Nuclear Scattering . 18 2.4.1 Cross sections . 18 2.4.2 Resonances and the Breit-Wigner formula . 19 2.4.3 Nuclear scattering and form factors . 22 2.5 Key points . 24 Appendices 25 2.A Natural units . 25 2.B Tools . 26 2.B.1 Decays and the Fermi Golden Rule . 26 2.B.2 Density of states . 26 2.B.3 Fermi G.R. example . 27 2.B.4 Lifetimes and decays . 27 2.B.5 The flux factor . 28 2.B.6 Luminosity . 28 2.C Shell Model § ............................. 29 2.D Gamma decays § ............................ 29 3 Hadrons 33 3.1 Introduction . 33 3.1.1 Pions . 33 3.1.2 Baryon number conservation . 34 3.1.3 Delta baryons . 35 3.2 Linear Accelerators . 36 iii CONTENTS CONTENTS 3.3 Symmetries . 36 3.3.1 Baryons . 37 3.3.2 Mesons . 37 3.3.3 Quark flow diagrams . 38 3.3.4 Strangeness . 39 3.3.5 Pseudoscalar octet . 40 3.3.6 Baryon octet . 40 3.4 Colour . 41 3.5 Heavier quarks . 43 3.6 Charmonium . 45 3.7 Hadron decays . 47 Appendices 48 3.A Isospin § ................................ 49 3.B Discovery of the Omega § ......................
  • Ions, Protons, and Photons As Signatures of Monopoles

    Ions, Protons, and Photons As Signatures of Monopoles

    universe Article Ions, Protons, and Photons as Signatures of Monopoles Vicente Vento Departamento de Física Teórica-IFIC, Universidad de Valencia-CSIC, 46100 Burjassot (Valencia), Spain; [email protected] Received: 8 October 2018; Accepted: 1 November 2018; Published: 7 November 2018 Abstract: Magnetic monopoles have been a subject of interest since Dirac established the relationship between the existence of monopoles and charge quantization. The Dirac quantization condition bestows the monopole with a huge magnetic charge. The aim of this study was to determine whether this huge magnetic charge allows monopoles to be detected by the scattering of charged ions and protons on matter where they might be bound. We also analyze if this charge favors monopolium (monopole–antimonopole) annihilation into many photons over two photon decays. 1. Introduction The theoretical justification for the existence of classical magnetic poles, hereafter called monopoles, is that they add symmetry to Maxwell’s equations and explain charge quantization. Dirac showed that the mere existence of a monopole in the universe could offer an explanation of the discrete nature of the electric charge. His analysis leads to the Dirac Quantization Condition (DQC) [1,2] eg = N/2, N = 1, 2, ..., (1) where e is the electron charge, g the monopole magnetic charge, and we use natural units h¯ = c = 1 = 4p#0. Monopoles have been a subject of experimental interest since Dirac first proposed them in 1931. In Dirac’s formulation, monopoles are assumed to exist as point-like particles and quantum mechanical consistency conditions lead to establish the value of their magnetic charge. Because of of the large magnetic charge as a consequence of Equation (1), monopoles can bind in matter [3].
  • Pioneering Project Research Activity Report 新領域開拓課題 研究業績報告書

    Pioneering Project Research Activity Report 新領域開拓課題 研究業績報告書

    Pioneering Project Research Activity Report 新領域開拓課題 研究業績報告書 Fundamental Principles Underlying the Hierarchy of Matter 物質階層原理 Lead Researcher: Reizo KATO 研究代表者：加藤 礼三 From April 2017 to March 2020 Heterogeneity at Materials Interfaces ヘテロ界面 Lead Researcher: Yousoo Kim 研究代表者：金 有洙 From April 2018 to March 2020 RIKEN May 2020 Contents I. Outline 1 II. Research Achievements and Future Prospects 65 III. Research Highlights 85 IV. Reference Data 139 Outline －1－ / Outline of two projects Fundamental Principles Underlying the Hierarchy of Matter: A Comprehensive Experimental Study / • Outline of the Project This five-year project lead by Dr. R. Kato is the collaborative effort of eight laboratories, in which we treat the hierarchy of matter from hadrons to biomolecules with three underlying and interconnected key concepts: interaction, excitation, and heterogeneity. The project consists of experimental research conducted using cutting-edge technologies, including lasers, signal processing and data acquisition, and particle beams at RIKEN RI Beam Factory (RIBF) and RIKEN Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL). • Physical and chemical views of matter lead to major discoveries Although this project is based on the physics and chemistry of non-living systems, we constantly keep all types of matter, including living matter, in our mind. The importance of analyzing matter from physical and chemical points of view was demonstrated in the case of DNA. The Watson-Crick model of DNA was developed based on the X-ray diffraction, which is a physical measurement. The key feature of this model is the hydrogen bonding that occurs between DNA base pairs. Watson and Crick learned about hydrogen bonding in the renowned book “The Nature of the Chemical Bond,” written by their competitor, L.
  • A Bridge Between Nuclear and Particle Physics

    A Bridge Between Nuclear and Particle Physics

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Related content - What’s Next for Particle Physics?: Modern hadron spectroscopy: a bridge between Introduction M White nuclear and particle physics. - Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Jifeng Hu and BESIII Collaboration To cite this article: A. P. Szczepaniak 2018 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1014 012017 - Progress in light hadron spectroscopy at BESIII W C Yan View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 131.169.5.251 on 15/05/2018 at 23:01 International Workshop "Nuclear Reactions on Nucleons and Nuclei" IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1014 (2018) 012017 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1014/1/012017 Modern hadron spectroscopy: a bridge between nuclear and particle physics. A. P. Szczepaniak Physics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA, Center for Exploration of Energy and Matter, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47403, USA, Theory Center, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this talk I discuss aspects of hadron physics, which soon are expected to shed new light on the fundamental QCD phenomena. In the analysis of hadron reactions and their propertieds I emphasize similarities to the nuclear many body problem. 1. Introduction The vast majority of nuclear phenomena can be understood using protons and neutrons as elementary constituents and the nonrelativistic interactions among them. On the other hand, Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), which is the underlying theory of nuclear forces, describes the relativistic quarks and gluons as the fundamental degrees of freedom.
  • Snowmass 2021 Letter of Interest: Hadron Spectroscopy at Belle II

    Snowmass 2021 Letter of Interest: Hadron Spectroscopy at Belle II

    Snowmass 2021 Letter of Interest: Hadron Spectroscopy at Belle II on behalf of the U.S. Belle II Collaboration D. M. Asner1, Sw. Banerjee2, J. V. Bennett3, G. Bonvicini4, R. A. Briere5, T. E. Browder6, D. N. Brown2, C. Chen7, D. Cinabro4, J. Cochran7, L. M. Cremaldi3, A. Di Canto1, K. Flood6, B. G. Fulsom8, R. Godang9, W. W. Jacobs10, D. E. Jaffe1, K. Kinoshita11, R. Kroeger3, R. Kulasiri12, P. J. Laycock1, K. A. Nishimura6, T. K. Pedlar13, L. E. Piilonen14, S. Prell7, C. Rosenfeld15, D. A. Sanders3, V. Savinov16, A. J. Schwartz11, J. Strube8, D. J. Summers3, S. E. Vahsen6, G. S. Varner6, A. Vossen17, L. Wood8, and J. Yelton18 1Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973 2University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292 3University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677 4Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202 5Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 6University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 7Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 8Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352 9University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688 10Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47408 11University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 12Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia 30144 13Luther College, Decorah, Iowa 52101 14Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 15University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 16University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 17Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 18University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 Corresponding Author: B. G. Fulsom (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), [email protected] Thematic Area(s): (RF07) Hadron Spectroscopy 1 Abstract: The Belle II experiment at the SuperKEKB energy-asymmetric e+e− collider is a substantial upgrade of the B factory facility at KEK in Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Lecture 2 - Energy and Momentum

    Lecture 2 - Energy and Momentum

    Lecture 2 - Energy and Momentum E. Daw February 16, 2012 1 Energy In discussing energy in a relativistic course, we start by consid- ering the behaviour of energy in the three regimes we worked with last time. In the first regime, the particle velocity v is much less than c, or more precisely β < 0:3. In this regime, the rest energy ER that the particle has by virtue of its non{zero rest mass is much greater than the kinetic energy T which it has by virtue of its kinetic energy. The rest energy is given by Einstein's famous equation, 2 ER = m0c (1) So, here is an example. An electron has a rest mass of 0:511 MeV=c2. What is it's rest energy?. The important thing here is to realise that there is no need to insert a factor of (3×108)2 to convert from rest mass in MeV=c2 to rest energy in MeV. The units are such that 0.511 is already an energy in MeV, and to get to a mass you would need to divide by c2, so the rest mass is (0:511 MeV)=c2, and all that is left to do is remove the brackets. If you divide by 9 × 1016 the answer is indeed a mass, but the units are eV m−2s2, and I'm sure you will appreciate why these units are horrible. Enough said about that. Now, what about kinetic energy? In the non{relativistic regime β < 0:3, the kinetic energy is significantly smaller than the rest 1 energy.
  • Relativistic Particle Orbits

    Relativistic Particle Orbits

    H. Kleinert, PATH INTEGRALS August 12, 2014 (/home/kleinert/kleinert/books/pathis/pthic19.tex) Agri non omnes frugiferi sunt Not all fields are fruitful Cicero (106 BC–43 BC), Tusc. Quaest., 2, 5, 13 19 Relativistic Particle Orbits Particles moving at large velocities near the speed of light are called relativistic particles. If such particles interact with each other or with an external potential, they exhibit quantum effects which cannot be described by fluctuations of a single particle orbit. Within short time intervals, additional particles or pairs of particles and antiparticles are created or annihilated, and the total number of particle orbits is no longer invariant. Ordinary quantum mechanics which always assumes a fixed number of particles cannot describe such processes. The associated path integral has the same problem since it is a sum over a given set of particle orbits. Thus, even if relativistic kinematics is properly incorporated, a path integral cannot yield an accurate description of relativistic particles. An extension becomes necessary which includes an arbitrary number of mutually linked and branching fluctuating orbits. Fortunately, there exists a more efficient way of dealing with relativistic particles. It is provided by quantum field theory. We have demonstrated in Section 7.14 that a grand-canonical ensemble of particle orbits can be described by a functional integral of a single fluctuating field. Branch points of newly created particle lines are accounted for by anharmonic terms in the field action. The calculation of their effects proceeds by perturbation theory which is systematically performed in terms of Feynman diagrams with calculation rules very similar to those in Section 3.18.
  • Light and Heavy Mesons in the Complex Mass Scheme

    Light and Heavy Mesons in the Complex Mass Scheme

    MAXLA-2/19, “Meson” September 25, 2019 Light and Heavy Mesons in The Complex Mass Scheme Mikhail N. Sergeenko Fr. Skaryna Gomel State University, BY-246019, Gomel, BELARUS [email protected] Mesons containing light and heavy quarks are studied. Interaction of quarks is described by the funnel-type potential with the distant dependent strong cou- pling, αS(r). Free particle hypothesis for the bound state is developed: quark and antiquark move as free particles in of the bound system. Relativistic two- body wave equation with position dependent particle masses is used to describe the flavored Qq systems. Solution of the equation for the system in the form of a standing wave is given. Interpolating complex-mass formula for two exact asymptotic eigenmass expressions is obtained. Mass spectra for some leading- state flavored mesons are calculated. Pacs: 11.10.St; 12.39.Pn; 12.40.Nn; 12.40.Yx Keywords: bound state, meson, resonance, complex mass, Regge trajectory arXiv:1909.10511v1 [hep-ph] 21 Sep 2019 PRESENTED AT NONLINEAR PHENOMENA IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS XXVI International Seminar Chaos, Fractals, Phase Transitions, Self-organization May 21–24, 2019, Minsk, Belarus 1 I. INTRODUCTION Mesons are most numerous of hadrons in the Particle Data Group (PDG) tables [1]. They are simplest relativistic quark-antiquark systems in case of equal-mass quarks, but they are not simple if quarks’ masses are different. It is believed that physics of light and heavy mesons is different; this is true only in asymptotic limits of large and small distances. Most mesons listed in the PDG being unstable and are resonances, exited quark-antiquark states.
  • Hadron Spectroscopy, Baryon Spectroscopy and Meson

    Hadron Spectroscopy, Baryon Spectroscopy and Meson

    Integrative Molecular Medicine Image ISSN: 2056-6360 Hadron spectroscopy, baryon spectroscopy and meson spectroscopy comparative study on malignant and benign human cancer cells and tissues under synchrotron radiation Alireza Heidari* Faculty of Chemistry, California South University, 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA In the current study, we have experimentally and comparatively investigated and compared malignant human cancer cells and tissues before and after irradiating of synchrotron radiation using Hadron spectroscopy, Baryon spectroscopy and Meson spectroscopy. In the current study, we have experimentally and comparatively investigated and compared malignant human cancer cells and tissues before and after irradiating of synchrotron radiation using Hadron spectroscopy, Baryon spectroscopy and Meson spectroscopy. It is clear that malignant human cancer cells and tissues have gradually transformed to benign human cancer cells and tissues under synchrotron radiation with the passing of time (Figures 1-3) [1-198]. It can be concluded that malignant human cancer cells and tissues have gradually transformed to benign human cancer cells and tissues under synchrotron radiation with the passing of time (Figures 1-3) [1- 198]. Figure 2. Baryon spectroscopy analysis of malignant human cancer cells and tissues (a) before and (b) after irradiating of synchrotron radiation in transformation process to benign human cancer cells and tissues with the passing of time [1-198] *Correspondence to: Alireza Heidari, Faculty of Chemistry, California
  • Time–Resolved Resonance FT–IR and Raman Spectroscopy And

    Time–Resolved Resonance FT–IR and Raman Spectroscopy And

    Global Imaging Insights Image ISSN: 2399-7397 Time–resolved resonance FT–IR and raman spectroscopy and density functional theory investigation of vibronic– mode coupling structure in vibrational spectra of nano- polypeptide macromolecule beyond the multi–dimensional franck–condon integrals approximation and density matrix method Alireza Heidari1,2*, Jennifer Esposito1 and Angela Caissutti1 1Faculty of Chemistry, California South University, 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA 2American International Standards Institute, Irvine, CA 3800, USA Abstract A macromolecule is a very large molecule, such as protein, commonly created by the polymerization of smaller subunits (monomers). They are typically composed of thousands of atoms or more. The most common macromolecules in biochemistry are biopolymers (nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates and lipids) and large non–polymeric molecules (such as lipids and macrocycles). Synthetic macromolecules include common plastics and synthetic fibers as well as experimental materials such as carbon nanotubes. Parameters such as FT –IR and Raman vibrational wavelengths and intensities for single crystal Nano polypeptide macromolecule are calculated using density functional theory and were compared with empirical results. The investigation about vibrational spectrum of cycle dimers in crystal with carboxyl groups from each molecule of acid was shown that it leads to create Hydrogen bonds for adjacent molecules. The current study aimed to investigate the possibility of simulating the empirical values. Analysis of vibrational spectrum of Nano polypeptide macromolecule is performed based on theoretical simulation and FT–IR empirical spectrum and Raman empirical spectrum using density functional theory in levels of HF/6–31G*, HF/6–31++G**, MP2/6–31G, MP2/6– 31++G**, BLYP/6–31G, BLYP/6–31++G**, B3LYP/6–31G and B3LYP6–31–HEG**.
  • Hadron Spectroscopyspectroscopy Inin Diffractivediffractive Andand Centralcentral Productionproduction Processesprocesses Atat COMPASSCOMPASS

    Hadron Spectroscopyspectroscopy Inin Diffractivediffractive Andand Centralcentral Productionproduction Processesprocesses Atat COMPASSCOMPASS

    HadronHadron spectroscopyspectroscopy inin diffractivediffractive andand centralcentral productionproduction processesprocesses atat COMPASSCOMPASS Prometeusz Jasinski for the COMPASS collaboration - Diffraction 2010 - Beyond the qq model Constituent quark model QCD prediction: meson states beyond Color neutral qq systems Hybrids: qqg Quantum numbers (IG) JPC Tetraquarks: (qq)(qq) P=(-1)L+1 C=(-1)L+S G=(-1)I+L+1 → “Spin exotics” JPC multiplets: 0++, 0-+, 1--, 1+-, 1++, 2++, … -- +- -+ +- -+ Forbidden: 0 , 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , ... Glueballs: gg, ggg Production mechanisms Diffractive Scattering Central Production The COMPASS Spectrometer 2008/2009 The COMPASS Spectrometer 2008/2009 Beam properties Beam properties Beam energy 190 GeV/c² Beam energy 190 GeV/c² Beam composition: - - Beam composition: p -: K -: p = 0.97 : 0.024 : 0.008 p : K : p = 0.97 : 0.024 : 0.008 or + + or p +: K +: p = 0.24 : 0.014 : 0.75 p : K : p = 0.24 : 0.014 : 0.75 Up to 5 x 10⁶ particles/s Up to 5 x 10⁶ particles/s beam The COMPASS Spectrometer 2008/2009 CEDARCEDAR detectors detectors for for beambeam particle particle identification identification The COMPASS Spectrometer 2008/2009 CEDARCEDAR detectors detectors for for beambeam particle particle identification identification Cerenkov Differential counter with Achromatic Ring Focus The COMPASS Spectrometer 2008/2009 RecoilRecoil proton proton detecto detectorr aroundaround 4040 cm cm long long lH2 lH2 target target oror ArrayArray of of solid solid state state discs discs The COMPASS Spectrometer 2008/2009 The COMPASS Spectrometer 2008/2009 Further important upgrades ECALECAL Laser Laser monitoringmonitoring system, system, radhard glass, Sandwich veto radhard glass, Sandwich veto shashlikshashlik modules modules matchingmatching the the spectrometer spectrometer acceptanceacceptance RICHRICH upgrade in 2006 SeveralSeveral tracking tracking upgrade in 2006 detectorsdetectors upgraded: upgraded: coldcold Silicon Silicon stations, stations, PixelPixel GEMs, GEMs, Micromegas,Micromegas, ..