Landscape Report

LAND SOUTH OF OLD BATH ROAD, SONNING, WOKINGHAM

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

LANDSCAPE REPORT

on behalf of Arlington Retirement Lifestyles

October 2020

Enplan, Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard, Milton Keynes MK9 2AH Offices also at Tunbridge Wells Directors: PG Russell-Vick DipLA CMLI • MA Carpenter BA(Hons) MRTPI • RJ Hodgetts BA(Hons) DipLA CMLI

01908 303701 [email protected] www.enplan.net

Enplan is the trading name of Enplan UK Limited. Registered in England & Wales with Company Number 4608553. A list of directors is available at the registered office; Preston Park House, South Road, Brighton, BN1 6SB.

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

2 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 5

2.0 LANDSCAPE RELATED PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT ...... 7 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, February 2019): ...... 7 Core Strategy (2010)...... 8 Managing Development’ Delivery Local Plan (2014) ...... 9 Wokingham Local Plan ...... 11

3.0 LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ...... 13 Landscape Character ...... 13 National Context ...... 13 Borough ...... 14 Site Context ...... 15

4.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT APPRAISAL...... 17 Outline Proposals ...... 17 Visual Impact Assessment ...... 18 Landscape Character Effects ...... 21

5.0 CONCLUSIONS ...... 25

Figures 1 Site Context (Location of Wider Viewpoints) 2 Topography Plan 3 Landscape Designation Plan 4 Zone of Theoretical Visibility (with buffers) 5 Landscape and Visual (Location of Viewpoints and Site Appraisal Views) 6 Landscape Character Areas 7 Views A and B 8 Views C and D 9 Views E and F 10 Views G and H 11 Views J 12 Viewpoint 1

| 3

13 Viewpoint 2 14 Viewpoint 3 15 Viewpoint 4 16 Viewpoint 5 17 Viewpoint 6 18 Viewpoint 7 19 Viewpoint 8 20 Viewpoint 9 21 Photomontage Viewpoint 2 Existing 22 Photomontage Viewpoint 2 Year 1 23 Photomontage Viewpoint 2 Year 15 24 Photomontage Viewpoint 7 Existing 25 Photomontage Viewpoint 7 Year 1 26 Photomontage Viewpoint 7 Year 15 27 Photomontage Viewpoint 9 Existing 28 Photomontage Viewpoint 9 Year 1 29 Photomontage Viewpoint 9 Year 15 30 Illustrative Landscape Masterplan

Appendices Appendix A Landscape and Visual Appraisal Methodology Appendix B National Character Area Profile: Thames Valley (NCA115) Appendix C Wokingham Borough Council: Landscape Character Assessment (2004) Type J: Settled and Farmed Clay: Sub Category J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay Appendix D Landscape Supporting Graphics

4 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Enplan is a multi-disciplinary practice of planners, landscape architects and environmental consultants. Enplan were appointed instructed by Arlington Retirement Lifestyles to produce a preliminary Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal for Land to the west of The Range, Sonning to inform on the implications on the visibility and landscape character of the proposed Site for residential development.

1.2 This report sets out a preliminary assessment of the potential landscape and visual effects of developing the land for residential use at Land to the west of The Range. The report defines the existing landscape conditions, assesses the character and quality of the landscape and analyses the visual and landscape effects of the proposal. The report also considers a sketch concept of a potential site layout.

1.3 The baseline position against which this assessment has been undertaken is as per the current position on the ground. The site is located adjacent to the A4 Bath Road and off the Old Bath Road. Immediately to the north east is the Sunrise Senior Living Care Home and to the south Sonning Golf Course. Existing residential development is located to the west.

1.4 To the south west is located adjacent to the Sonning Golf Club car park is an approved development of 13 dwellings with associated highway works, public open space and landscaping. This was approved at Appeal in 2018 and the inspector noted the following:

…..the encroachment into the countryside would be fairly limited given the relatively small size of the site. The development would also extend an area of existing built development and so would not appear as being unduly incongruous in relation to the overall pattern and built development in the area. Whilst likely to represent a greater intensity of built development in comparison to most of the surrounding development, the site would be capable of being developed for the number of dwellings proposed without it appearing as unacceptably cramped. The retention of the majority of the band of trees and landscaping adjacent to the front boundary would also provide good screening when viewed from Pound Lane and Duffield Road. Whilst some tree removal would be required for the proposed access this would be limited in its extent.

This application proposes three blocks with 57 units contained on all its sides by mature trees and understorey planting along with a comprehensive mitigation strategy to further contain it and integrate it into the existing landscape and urban fabric.

1.5 There is an approved planning application ref no: 171424 on the site for the removal of ‘The Range’ and ‘Red Lodge’ and to replace them with 6 no dwellings and associated landscape. In the approval notice it stated:

| 5

Overall the proposal seems to be sympathetic to the location and protected trees. Views into the site from public areas will be minimal.

Within the approved scheme a similar number of trees were removed to accommodate the development as with this application. This application provides for considerably more trees as part of the landscape proposals to replace the ones being lost.

1.6 The Study Area for this assessment has been defined to incorporate all parts of the landscape that potentially may have a view of the proposals (referred to later in this chapter as the Zone of Theoretical Visibility or ZTV with buffers).

1.7 Assessments undertaken within this appraisal have been undertaken in accordance with the 3rd Edition of ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (GLVIA3). The assessment and landscape design work has been led by Richard Hodgetts BA Hons DipLA CMLI, Landscape Director of Enplan and a Chartered Landscape Architect with over 27 years’ experience.

1.8 The proposal is to construct a development of high-quality retirement apartments. This will comprise up to 57 dwellings suitable for older persons accommodation (Use Class C3) with consideration of means of access, layout and scale. The application is submitted in outline form, with means of access, layout and scale subject to consideration with matters of appearance and landscaping reserved for future determination. The proposed illustrative plans have been prepared by Bowman Riley Architects and the Landscape Proposals by Enplan.

6 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

2.0 LANDSCAPE RELATED PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT

2.1 This section describes the background of relevant national and local planning policies, in so far as they relate to landscape matters, against which the development proposals will be determined. See Figure 3.

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, February 2019):

2.2 National Planning Policy Framework The NPPF sets out the Government’s economic, environmental and social planning policy and in combination these policies give the Government’s vision of sustainable development. The NPPF emphasises the need for well-designed places, promoting healthy and safe communities and conserving and enhancing the natural environment.

2.3 Regarding landscape and Green Infrastructure, the Natural Environment section of the NPPF provides a policy context for the countryside and Green Infrastructure. The key objectives include protecting and enhancing valued landscapes and, minimising impacts on and providing net gains for biodiversity, including by establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures.

2.4 Paragraph 145 relates to development in the Green Belt and states in part g) that limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously developed land, whether redundant or in continuing use (excluding temporary buildings), which would:

- not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development; or

- not cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt, where the development would re-use previously developed land and contribute to meeting an identified affordable housing need within the area of the local planning authority.

Please refer to Section 4.14 for commentary on this point

2.5 Paragraph 170 states at part a) that planning policies and decisions should protect and enhance valued landscapes and goes on to clarify that this should be in a manner commensurate with their statutory status or identified quality in the development plan. Part b) states that planning policies and decisions should recognise “the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside”.

| 7

Paragraph 171 advises that:

2.6 “Plans should: distinguish between the hierarchy of international, national and locally designated sites; allocate land with the least environmental or amenity value, where consistent with other policies in this Framework; take a strategic approach to maintaining and enhancing networks of habitats and Green Infrastructure; and plan for the enhancement of natural capital at a catchment or landscape scale across local authority boundaries”.

Paragraph 172 goes on to add:

2.7 “Great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which have the highest status of protection in relation to these issues”.

2.8 The site is within an undesignated landscape with no special protected status. The character of the site and its immediate context is assessed within this report to help inform decisions regarding “the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside”. The potential to enhance Green Infrastructure networks is also considered.

Core Strategy (2010)

2.9 The Core Strategy was adopted on 29 January 2010. The specific policies found within the Core Strategy that are of relevance to the consideration of this development are summarised below:

• CP1 – Sustainable Development: Planning permission will be granted for development proposals that, amongst other things, maintain or enhance the high quality of the environment, ensure the provision of adequate drainage, and provide attractive, functional, accessible, safe, secure and adaptable schemes;

• CP3 – General Principles for development: Planning permission will be granted for proposals that are of an appropriate scale of activity, mass, layout, built form, height, materials and character to the area together with a high quality of design without detriment to the amenities of adjoining land users including open spaces or occupiers and their quality of life

• CP4 – Infrastructure Requirements: Planning permission will not be granted unless appropriate arrangements for the improvement or provision of infrastructure, services, community and other facilities required for the development taking account of the cumulative impact of schemes are agreed. Arrangements for provision or improvement to the required standard will be secured by planning obligations or condition if appropriate.

• CP5 – Housing Mix, Density and affordability: Planning permission will be granted for residential development providing a mix and balance of densities, dwelling types, tenures and sizes. The Council will negotiate the tenure, size and

8 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

type of affordable units on a site by site basis having regard to housing needs, site specifics and other factors

• CP6 – Managing Travel Demand: Planning permission will be granted for schemes that provide for sustainable forms of transport to allow choice; mitigate any adverse effects upon the local and strategic transport network, and provide appropriate vehicular parking, having regard to car ownership

• CP7 – Biodiversity: Development which may harm habitats or, species of principle importance in England for nature conservation, veteran trees or features of the landscape that are of major importance for wild flora and fauna (including wildlife and river corridors), whether directly or indirectly will be only permitted if mitigation measures can be put in place to prevent damaging impacts.

• CP9 – Scale and location of development proposals: The scale of development proposals in Wokingham borough must reflect the existing or proposed levels of facilities and services at or in the location, together with their accessibility. Development proposals within development limits will be acceptable with limited development locations of Arborfield Cross, Barkham Hill, Charvil, Finchampstead, Hurst, Riseley, Sindlesham, Sonning and Swallowfield.

• CP17 – Housing delivery: Provision will be made for the development of at least 13,230 dwellings and associated development and infrastructure in the Borough in the period 2006-2026. For the period April 2016 to March 2021 – an average of 723 dwellings per annum is expected.

Managing Development’ Delivery Local Plan (2014)

2.10 The Managing Development Delivery Local Plan was adopted on 21 February 2014. This document sets out those policies found within the Managing Development Delivery Local Plan that are considered relevant to the development proposals are summarised below:

• Policy CC02 – Development Limits: New development located at the edge of, but within the development limit, should demonstrate how the interrelationship between open countryside and the built form is respected. Careful siting and design of new development at the edge of development limits must allow for an approach which provides a transition between the built area and the open countryside. The aim is for development to recede and soften in relation to adjoining open countryside and avoid hard edges.

• Policy CC03 – Green Infrastructure, Trees and Landscaping: Development proposals should demonstrate how they have considered the integration of the

| 9

scheme with any adjoining public open space or countryside, protect and retain existing trees, hedges and other landscape features.

• Policy CC04 – Sustainable Design and Construction: Planning permission will only be granted for proposals that seek to deliver high quality sustainably designed and constructed developments by seeking to achieve the requirements of the full Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4; and Meet internal potable water consumption targets of 105 litres or less per person per day (as part of the requirement to meet full Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4).

• Policy CC05 – Renewable energy and decentralised energy networks: Local opportunities to contribute towards decentralised energy supply from renewable and low-carbon technologies will be encouraged

• Policy CC07 – Parking: Planning permission will only be granted where the proposal demonstrates how the proposed parking provision meets the adopted parking standards and the new scheme retains an appropriate overall level of off- street parking

• Policy CC09 – Development and Flood Risk (from all sources): All sources of flood risk, including historic flooding, must be taken into account at all stages and to the appropriate degree at all levels in the planning application process to avoid inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding. Where required, suitable and appropriately detailed flood risk information will need to accompany a planning application.

• Policy CC10 – Sustainable Drainage: All development proposals must ensure surface water arising from the proposed development including taking into account climate change is managed in a sustainable manner must be demonstrated through a Flood Risk Assessment, or through a Surface Water Drainage Strategy.

• Policy TB05 – Housing Mix: Proposals for residential development shall provide for an appropriate housing mix which reflects a balance between the underlying character of the area and both the current and projected needs of households. Any scheme that requires the provision of affordable housing should provide an appropriate mix of accommodation on a site by site basis, which reflects the Council’s Housing Strategy and the Affordable Housing SPD.

• Policy TB06 – Development of Private Residential Gardens: The Council will resist inappropriate development of residential gardens where development would cause harm to the local area. Proposals for new residential development that includes land within the curtilage, or the former curtilage of private residential gardens will only be granted planning permission where

(a) The proposal makes a positive contribution to the character of the area,

10 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

including in terms of the relationship of the existing built form and spaces around buildings within the surrounding area

(b) The application site provides a site of adequate size and dimensions to accommodate the development proposed in terms of the setting and spacing around buildings, amenity space, landscaping and space for access roads and parking

• Policy TB07 – Internal Space Standards: Proposals for new residential units, including change of use or conversions, should ensure that the internal layout and size are suitable to serve the amenity requirements of future occupiers

• TB09 – Residential accommodation for vulnerable groups: The Council will in principle support proposals which provide for the following types of accommodation to provide for peoples’ needs over a lifetime:

(i) Extra care homes

(ii) Dementia extra care units

(iii) Enhanced sheltered schemes

(iv) Proposals that allow the elderly and those with disabilities to remain in their own homes or purpose-built accommodation

• Policy TB21 – Landscape Character: Proposals must demonstrate how they have addressed the requirements of the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment, including the landscape quality; landscape strategy; landscape sensitivity and key issues. Proposals shall retain or enhance the condition, character and features that contribute to the landscape.

• Policy TB23 – Biodiversity and Development: Planning permission for development proposals will only be granted where they comply with policy CP7 – Biodiversity of the Core Strategy and also demonstrate how they provide opportunities, including through design, layout and landscaping to incorporate new biodiversity features or enhance existing features.

Wokingham Local Plan

2.11 Wokingham Borough Council is in the process updating reviewing its adopted Development Plan. The emerging Local Plan review and put in place up-to-date planning policies. Upon adoption, the Local Plan update will replace the current Core Strategy and Managing Development Delivery plans which cover the period to 2026.

| 11

2.12 The Council recently held public consultation (Reg. 18) on the emerging Local Plan between 3 February and 3 April 2020. It is expected that consultation on the Proposed Submission Document will take place September – October 2020 ahead of submission of the document to the Secretary of State in Winter 2020.

2.13 The emerging planning policies which are considered pertinent to the consideration of the proposals are listed below:

• Policy SS1: Spatial Strategy

• Policy SS2: Settlement Hierarchy and scale and location of development proposals

• Policy SS8: Climate Change

• Policy SS9: Adaptation to Climate Change

• Policy SS10: Supporting Infrastructure

• Policy C1: Active and Sustainable Transport and Accessibility

• Policy C3: Cycling and Walking

• Policy C4: Vehicle and Cycle Parking

• Policy H1: Housing Provision

• Policy H3: Housing mix, density and standards

• Policy H5: Affordable Housing

• Policy H9: Accommodation for Older People and Vulnerable Communities

• Policy H14: Development of Private Residential Gardens

• Policy DH1: Place Making and Quality Design

• Policy DH2: Safeguarding Amenity

• Policy DH9: Environmental Standards for residential development

• Policy HC1: Promoting Healthy Communities

• Policy NE3: Trees, Woodland and hedgerows

• Policy NE4: Development and existing trees, woodland and hedgerows

• Policy NE5: Landscape and Design

• Policy NE8: Development and Flood risk (from all sources).

12 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

3.0 LANDSCAPE CONTEXT

Landscape Character

3.1 Landscape character assessment (LCA) is the key tool for understanding the landscape and should be used to form the baseline for assessing landscape effects that may arise from development proposals. The main elements that make up the landscape are physical influences (geology, soils, landform, drainage and water bodies), land cover (types of vegetation and patterns and types of tree cover) and the influence of human activity (land use and management, character of settlements and buildings, pattern and type of fields and enclosure). The aesthetic and perceptual aspects of the landscape are also key factors such as scale, complexity, openness, tranquillity, or wildness.

3.2 Many parts of the UK are already covered by existing character assessments at different scales, from broad-scale national or regional assessments, more detailed local authority assessments and in some cases fine-grain local or community assessments.

Published Landscape Character Assessments

3.3 The proposed Site sits just within the National Character Area Profile: Thames Valley (NCA115). Wokingham Borough Council: have published in 2004 a Landscape Character Assessment. The Site falls within Type J: Settled and Farmed Clay: Sub Category J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay. The relevant published landscape character data and related assessments include the following:

• National Character Area Profile: Thames Valley (NCA115).

• Wokingham Borough Council: Landscape Character Assessment. The Site falls within Type J: Settled and Farmed Clay: Sub Category J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

National Context

3.4 Countryside Character Volume 7: South East England and London sets the Site and study area (Figure 1) within the Thames Valley (NCA115). (refer Appendix B). The key characteristics of the Thames Valley relevant to this assessment are displayed as:

• Flat and low-lying land, rising to low, river-terraced hills, which include the prominent local outcrop of chalk on which Windsor Castle sits.

• The underlying geology is dominated by the London Clay which, over much of the area, is overlain by river-lain sands and gravels.

| 13

• The numerous hydrological features provide unity to an area which otherwise lacks homogeny; these features include the River Thames and its tributaries, streams, lakes, canals and open waterbodies (the result of restored gravel workings).

• Although densely populated and developed, pockets of woodland, open grassland, parkland, wetlands and intimate meadows provide escape and tranquillity, and include a variety of habitats supporting important populations of many species, notably stag beetle, shoveler, gadwall and other invertebrates and wildfowl.

• To the south, the open Thames flood plain dominates, with its associated flat grazing land, becoming characterised by a number of formal historic landscapes on higher ground. Between Hampton and Kew, the River Thames forms the focus of a series of designed landscapes.

• The area is important for recreation, both for residents and visitors. Historic parkland and commons provide access to green space, the Thames Path National Trail runs the length of the NCA, and a variety of activities are enjoyed on the river and other waterbodies.”

3.5 The landscape character is further described below;

“In the south-west, the gently rolling valley sides give way to a flatter plain east of Reading, which widens to include the Slough and Windsor areas. Much of this area is near flood level, although Slough lies on slightly terraced land above the flood plain and Windsor Castle sits on a prominent local outcrop of chalk.”

Borough

3.6 Wokingham Borough Council have carried out a landscape character assessment in 2004. The Application Site lies within the settlement boundary in the area as Type J: Settled and Farmed Clay and is further categorised as subcategory as J4: Woodley- Earley Settled and Farmed Clay.

3.7 The key characteristics of J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay are described as:

• A highly urbanised landscape due the presence of the town of Reading and the extension of settlement (Woodley and Earley into their former agricultural hinterland. Working arable farming within a system of large field units.

• Marginal agricultural land with a small remaining area of rural land (in the north) exhibiting an urban fringe character and defined by remnant fragment of arable agricultural land.

14 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

• Network of recreation spaces in and around the built-up area including parklands, golf courses and the grounds of extensive institutions - many of which have their origin in former historic parkland e.g. Whiteknights Estate/University of Reading.

• Network of major and minor roads cutting through the landscape.

• A number of Wildlife Heritage Sites both woodland and open water. Small tributary streams, many of which have been dammed to form lakes.

• The setting for the residential areas are enhanced by the subtly wooded ridgeline and stream corridors.

• Generally, an enclosed landscape but with some good views over surrounding lowlands from the open areas at the edge of the settled area.

3.8 A Site level landscape character assessment has not been undertaken as the character of the Site is consistent with the landscape character identified by Wokingham Borough Council as J4. However this character area covers a large area and the proposed Site sits on the edge of it within settlement.

Site Context

3.9 The site is located on the eastern edge of Sonning and comprises a single L shapes field parcel measuring 1.18ha in size. The site is bound by mature tree and hedgerow vegetation on all sides.

3.10 At present the site contains three large detached dwellings known as ‘Red Lodge’, ‘The Range’ and ‘The Lawns’ and a shared private access road. The Site is set back from Old Bath Road (a spur road from the newer A4 Bath Road) to the north.

3.11 The site is bound to the north by Old Bath Road, beyond which lies the A4 Bath Road and additional residential dwellings. Immediately east the site abuts a large three storey building that currently operates as Sunrise Nursing Home, an assisted living and care home. Further west lies open grassland that is used as a sports facility for Redingensians Rams RFC.

3.12 The southern boundary of the site is defined by a series of mature trees. Beyond the southern boundary is the grounds of the private Sonning Golf Club where there is no public access. To the west lies a cluster of residential dwellings off Sonning Gate and Pound Lane. Residential dwellings in the surrounding area predominately comprise of sub urban and large, detached form.

3.13 As noted in Section 1.4 there is a recently approved development to the north east of Sonning Golf Club and immediate car park for 13 dwellings and associated highway

| 15

works, public open space and landscaping. This was won at appeal and the inspector stated that the encroachment into the countryside would be limited given the relatively small size of the site.

3.14 The Site is located towards the east of Sonning and within its settlement boundary. It is approximately 2 miles east of Reading Town Centre which is easily accessible via car and regular bus services along the A4. Twyford and Woodley local centres are also approximately 1 and 1.5 miles away respectively and provide a range of services and facilities for local residents. Twyford Railway Station provides rail connections to Reading and the wider Thames Valley area, and into London Paddington.

3.15 The site is not constrained by an ecological or landscape designations that would prohibit development in this location.

3.16 The Site is flat at approximately 55m AOD. In the wider context, to the north west the landscape rises gently to 75m at Dunsden Green. The River Thames Valley is located to the north west beyond the village of Sonning. The topography is shown on Figure 2.

3.17 There are no public rights of way within or adjoining the Site. The closest public right of way is 1.2km along the River Thames to the north west.

3.18 The Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) with buffers is illustrated on Figure 4. The ‘with buffers’ represents the approximate zone within which it may be possible to see any part of the Site. Within the ZTV there may be a number of areas from which no views of the Site or development will be possible as a result of intervening landform, vegetation or built form, which may obscure views. The ‘with buffers’ ZTV confirms that the site is well contained within its local context.

3.19 The site is relatively small in comparison to the broad character descriptions described in the Thames Valley (NCA115) Character Area but does have some of the characteristics of those described in the Wokingham Borough Council: Landscape Character Assessment. Type J: Settled and Farmed Clay: Subcategory J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay. However, having undertaken a site appraisal and analysed both the character and visual issues we feel that the proposed site is relatively well self-contained within its local setting and little visibility from publically accessible viewpoints. The proposed development is for 3 blocks (A B and C) and is naturally screened by surrounding vegetation and thus has a minimal impact upon the existing landscape character.

3.20 The existing character of the site can be seen on Views A to J on Figures 7 to 11 for the location of these on Figure 5 Landscape and Visual (Location of Viewpoints and Site Appraisal Views).

16 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

4.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT APPRAISAL

Outline Proposals

4.1 An initial Landscape Masterplan has been prepared by Enplan (See Figure 30 ) which provides a layout of the Site based upon the masterplan created by Bowman Riley Architects.

4.2 The proposed development comprises of 57 dwellings divided into three new units that will replace the dwellings known as ‘Red Lodge’, ‘The Range’ and ‘The Lawns’.

4.3 There is an approved planning application ref no: 171424 on the site for the removal of ‘The Range’ and ‘Red Lodge’ and to replace them with 6 no dwellings and associated landscape. In the consent letter it stated:

Overall the proposal seems to be sympathetic to the location and protected trees. Views into the site from public areas will be minimal

4.4 As noted in Section 1.4 and Section 3.13 there is a recently approved development to the north east of Sonning Golf Club and immediate car park for 13 dwellings and associated highway works, public open space and landscaping. This site is located to the south east of this application. This was won at appeal and the inspector stated that the encroachment into the countryside would be limited given the relatively small size of the site.

4.5 The layout has been configured to ensure that the majority of existing trees and hedgerows will be retained and enhanced as part of the wider landscape strategy. The Landscape Masterplan demonstrates how green infrastructure has informed the development proposals with existing vegetation along the site boundaries being retained and enhanced to maintain the visual amenity with neighbouring properties.

4.6 At present, the existing tree and hedgerow vegetation creates a strong definition and screening to site. This will be reinforced by further new hedging and landscaping, with additional planting providing an opportunity for enhancing and increasing biodiversity within the site. The supplemental planting within the site will enhance the sense of place from the development, whilst also aiding wayfinding and identifying different spatial uses.

4.7 The proposed landscape design provides a ‘gardenesque’ scheme with a series of communal garden linked together by a sinuous path providing a journey and cohesion to the proposed development.

| 17

4.8 The top communal garden provides a shaded seating space beneath the existing retained tree with additional understorey planting and trees at the entrance and areas of lawn.

4.9 A path runs from the entrance to cross the new car parking area in front of Building A which is surrounded by clipped hedges. From the rear of Building A, a linear path runs between the building and the retained hedgerow to meet at the second communal garden. All the existing trees will be retained, and a new seat is located under the tree for passive relaxation. The path runs north west towards a new bowling green surrounded by clipped hedges and specimen trees. Seating is located against the new planting set within mown grass.

4.10 All the proposed car parking is screened by shrub planting of clipped hedges. From this area the path runs southwards towards the south eastern corner of the site which will form a third communal garden with a woodland character. The path continues along the south eastern side of Block B before ending in the lower communal garden which will comprise a circular space with an arbour/ pergola with seating beneath.

4.11 Enhanced tree shrub and ground cover planting will be located on the site’s boundaries and within the communal garden. As an interface between the two building a new pond and seating area will be located as a small communal garden for passive recreation and relaxation. The new car parking will be surrounded by hedges and additional shrub planting.

4.12 The proposed development provides a scheme that comprises of three natural clusters of new development located within the site in the areas that would have the least impact to the setting of the existing site character.

4.13 The communal garden spaces will be designed to allow a variety of size and hierarchy with both the vertical and horizontal planes being considered with trees, shrubs and ground cover creating gardens that are pretty, colourful and fragrant for all year round colour and interest.

Visual Impact Assessment

4.14 The purpose of this visual impact assessment is to identify a number of publicly accessible viewpoints within the relatively close proximity to the site at which locations where significant visual effects may be likely. If there were any especially prominent long distance views that would be affected, for example from well-known viewpoint locations or long distance trails these would have been included but there are no such locations where the effects would be noticeable and are not significant.

18 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

4.15 Paragraph 3.17 above has described the ZTV (with buffers) and of the general nature of the views from the wider surrounding area; these being very limited. Figure 5 identifies the location of nine viewpoints local to the site (within 2km).

4.16 Following on from comments by Wokingham Borough Council we have also produced three photomontages to demonstrate how the existing boundary vegetation and the proposed landscape proposals integrate the proposed development into the existing landscape fabric. These are described below and shown on Figures 21 to 28

4.17 Viewpoint 1 (Figure 12) is taken from Garde Road looking towards the proposed Site which is located beyond the existing housing and dense semi mature trees in the foreground. The view demonstrates how the existing mature trees and dwellings alongside the A4 Bath Road restricts views into the Site. From this location none of the proposed development would be seen. The effect on this view would not be noticeable and not adverse and not significant.

4.18 Viewpoint 2 (Figure 13) is taken from the public footpath/cycle way that runs alongside the A4 Bath Road. The Viewpoint is looking south west towards the proposed Site. The view shows the existing ‘Sunrise of Sonning Old Peoples Home’ to the left of the view which is located on the north eastern boundary of the proposed Site. The view also shows the semi mature trees which are located on the boundaries of the Site and on the verge between the A4 Bath Road and the Old Bath Road which further screens views of the proposed Site. The proposed development comprises of three units located broadly on the footprints of the existing houses called The Lawns, The Range and Red Lodge. The proposed development will be located in the middle of the view set back from The Old Bath Road and on a similar alignment to the adjacent care home which will be comparable in massing and height to the proposed development. In addition, as part of the proposed development additional tree planting and understorey shrub planting will be provided which will integrate the proposed development into the existing landscape fabric harmoniously. The effect on this view would not be noticeable and not adverse and not significant. We have provided on Figures 21,22 and 23 Photomontages of the proposed development from this Viewpoint. These have been produced to assist and demonstrate what the proposed development would look like at three points in time. The first shows The Existing View, the second at Year 1 and the third at Year 15 and demonstrate how the development will not be seen from this Viewpoint especially at Year 15 when the new tree planting along the north western boundary has matured screening the proposed development.

4.19 Viewpoint 3 (Figure 14) is taken are taken from Old Bath Road looking south west towards the proposed Site. The view shows the existing ‘Sunrise of Sonning Old Peoples Home’ to the left of the view. The view also shows the mature trees which are located on the north eastern boundary of the Site in the middle of the view. The proposed Site is

| 19

located behind these trees but set back at the same alignment as the existing adjacent Care Home. The proposed development comprises of three units located broadly on the footprints of the existing houses called The Lawns, The Range and Red Lodge. In addition, as part of the proposed development additional tree planting and understorey shrub planting will be provided along the north eastern boundary and will fill the gap between the two mature trees on the north eastern boundary thus screening the proposed development in this viewpoint. The effect on this view would not be noticeable and not adverse and not significant..

4.20 Viewpoint 4 (Figure 15) is taken from Old Bath Road looking south east towards the existing entrance to The Lawns and The Range and Red Lodge. This will be the same entrance to the proposed Site. The view shows how the existing mature trees screen views towards the proposed development. One tree will be removed at the entrance to accommodate the new entrance into the Site. However, these are being replaced by new tree and understorey planting which will provide additional screening. The effect on this view would not be noticeable and not adverse and not significant.

4.21 Viewpoint 5 (Figure 16) is taken from Old Bath Road looking south down the existing gravel access drive to The Range and Red Lodge. The existing leylandii hedge that forms the boundary to The Lawns is evident in the middle of the view. The drive will form the new access into the proposed development and the existing hedge will be removed to allow for the new access road. New tree and understorey shrub planting will be located at the entrance that will replace the trees that are being removed to integrate the proposed development into the existing landscape fabric. The effect on this view would be noticeable but not adverse and not significant.

4.22 Viewpoint 6 (Figure 17) is taken from the footpath that runs along the north carriageway of the A4 Bath Road looking east to south east towards the proposed Site. This is also a representative view from the existing dwellings located behind the footpath although set down from the road. The viewpoint demonstrates how the existing vegetation that runs between the southern boundary of the A4 bath Road and Old Bath Road provides a natural screen restricting views into the proposed Site. The existing semi mature and mature trees that run along the north western and north eastern boundary of the Site can be clearly seen in the middle of the view which restrict views into the proposed Site. New tree and understorey planting are proposed along the north western edge of the Site which over time will strengthen the existing semi mature planting. The effect on this view would not be noticeable and not adverse and not significant.

4.23 Viewpoint 7 (Figure 18) is taken from the public footpath that runs alongside the Old Bath Road looking east to south east towards the proposed Site. The view shows the existing A4 Bath Road to the left and the existing semi mature tree planting that forms the garden boundaries to the existing dwellings on Old Bath Road which screen views towards the proposed Site. The proposed development will be located in the middle of the view set back from The Old Bath Road and on a similar alignment to the adjacent care home and the existing dwellings adjacent which will be comparable in massing and

20 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

height to the proposed development. In addition, as part of the proposed development additional tree planting and understorey shrub planting will be provided which will integrate the proposed development into the existing landscape fabric harmoniously. The effect on this view would not be noticeable and not adverse and not significant. We have provided on Figures 24, 25 and 26 Photomontages of the proposed development from Viewpoint 7. These have been produced to assist and demonstrate what the proposed development would look like at three points in time. The first shows The Existing View, the second at Year 1 and the third at Year 15 and demonstrate how the development will be integrated into the existing landscape fabric and be screened from view.

4.24 Viewpoints 8 and 9 (Figures 19 and 20) are taken from the car park at Sonning Golf Club looking north over the existing evergreen yew hedge that forms the boundary of the car park towards the south eastern boundary of the proposed Site. Please note that these views are private views and thus have been included to demonstrate that the Site is contained by existing semi mature vegetation. This boundary is formed by a belt of mature and semi mature trees which provide natural mitigation containing visually the proposed Site. At the time of site survey it was noted that there is a limited view from the garden of Red Lodge to the driving range of Sonning Golf Course but as part of the proposed development this view will be screened by new understorey and additional tree planting. This can be seen on Viewpoint 8. The effect on this view would not be noticeable and not adverse and not significant. We have provided on Figures 27, 28 and 29 Photomontages of the proposed development from Viewpoint 9. These have been produced to assist and demonstrate what the proposed development would look like at three points in time. The first shows The Existing View, the second at Year 1 and the third at Year 15 and demonstrate how the development will not be seen from this Viewpoint especially at Year 15 when the new tree planting and understorey planting along the south eastern boundary has matured screening the proposed development.

4.25 In summary, no short, medium and long distance views are anticipated to be significantly adversely affected.

Landscape Character Effects

4.26 The proposed Site falls within the Thames Valley (NCA115) and one district character area Type J: Settled and Farmed Clay: Sub Category J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay. The district character areas describe accurately the proposed Site in more detail than the National Character Area and has been used to assess the landscape character impact assessment.

4.27 The value of this landscape is defined against the criteria set out at Table 7.5 within Appendix A. In this context this landscape is not designated or recognised otherwise in

| 21

a planning policy context, nor does it have any particular physical attributes which would make it “valued”, in the sense of paragraph 109 of the Framework, and, consequently, the landscape is considered to be of Local Value. In evaluating the value of undesignated landscapes, it is useful to consider other factors (as defined at Box 5.1 of GLVIA3 page 84) to understand the specific attributes of value which an undesignated landscape may have to a greater or lesser degree. Such aspects include landscape condition, scenic quality, rarity, representativeness, conservation interests, recreation value, perceptual aspects and associations. In this regard the landscape of the Woodley- Earley Settled and Farmed Clay J4 is considered to have the following attributes of value:

• Landscape quality (condition) – At the time of the visit the site comprises of three large gardens associated with The Lawns, The Range and Red Lodge and are maintained to a good standard with a number of mature trees set within and on the boundaries of the gardens. The Landscape Character area states that the landscape quality is in an overall Moderate condition ;

• Scenic quality – Views out of the site are contained by the semi mature and mature trees along the Sites boundaries and thus there are little to no views out of the Site;

• Rarity – There are no rare features within the site or its context and the local relatively flat landform, arable land use, hedgerow field boundaries and groups of trees are typical of the local area;

• Representativeness – Reasonably representative of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay J4 where the Site is located;

• Conservation interests – Conservation interest is limited to the boundaries of the proposed Site where generous linear belts of trees and understorey are located;

• Recreational value – There are no Public Rights of Way across the Site and the Site is not accessible to the public so there is no recreational value;

• Perceptual Aspects and Associations – The site has settlement influences from the existing urban elements that bound it to the north east and south west with the A4 Bath Road and Old bath Road to the north west. As far as it is known, the Site and the immediate landscape are not subject to any specific cultural associations in terms of artists or writers, nor known events in history.

4.28 Overall, within the context of a Local Value landscape, this part of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay J4 demonstrates aspects of value which are representative of this landscape which would suggest that the value remains a Local Value.

4.29 An assessment of the landscape susceptibility of this part of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay J4 to this form of development requires an analysis of the key landscape characteristics and the ability of these to accept the type, scale and form of

22 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

this development. The key physical characteristics of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay J4 are exhibited in this context and include the local landscape comprising of strong urban and suburban character. The landscape tranquillity in the vicinity and within the Site however is disturbed by the A4 Bath Road corridors.

4.30 Overall it is considered that the landscape susceptibility of the Site and immediate context is Slight Susceptibility, as defined in Table 7.6 at Appendix A, in that the clarity of only some of the key characteristics of the landscape context are clearly expressed within the Appeal Site and the robustness of these to change is strong. The changes to landscape character that could be brought about by a development of the type, scale and location proposed would have a good compatibility with these factors.

4.31 Taken together with a Local Value, the Slight Susceptibility of this landscape to the potential effects of this form of development means that the landscape character of this area of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay J4 is of Low Sensitivity to new development. This is also stated in the published Landscape Character Assessment.

4.32 Assessments of the magnitude of landscape effects are concerned with making “judgements about the size and scale of the effect, the extent of the area over which it occurs, whether it is reversible or irreversible and whether it is short or long term in duration” (GLVIA3 Glossary page 158). In terms of the key landscape elements that would be retained and not changed these include the existing boundary vegetation and the overall topographical form of the landscape. Also the Site is located within an existing settlement and thus the precedent for development has already been facilitated. These are the primary contributors to the Site’s sense of scale and character and they would remain. The magnitude of landscape effects is based on the criteria and definitions used at Table 7.8 at Appendix A.

4.33 Changes to the key perceptual characteristics, i.e. how the development is seen and affects the landscape character, can be correlated to a large degree with the results of the visual impact assessment. This indicates the main visual changes would occur at viewpoints in relatively close proximity to the Site (Viewpoints 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7) but these as noted before are minimal and easily mitigated.

4.34 It is considered that the proposals would not become a noticeable additional feature in the landscape context and not become a noticeable characteristic of that landscape. The overall assessment of the magnitude of landscape character effects is a balance of both positive and negative aspects of the proposals and is considered to be a Slight one in the short term (at Year 1), which when combined with a landscape sensitivity assessment of Low sensitivity would result in an overall significance of effect of Minor and Not Significant, well below what would be considered to be significant in the terms expressed in the EIA Regulations. In the longer term, when the mitigation tree planting

| 23

matures the benefits would increase and the overall magnitude would reduce to Negligible and the significance of this effect reduced further.

24 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

5.1 The main landscape and visual issues associated with the proposals are considered to be:

• The visual impact on users of the public highways, public rights of way, and on nearby residencies; and

• The character and appearance of the landscape;

5.2 The visual impact assessment has highlighted virtually all the available views of the proposed development from the publicly accessible locations, i.e. those from public footpaths, roads, and nearby residences.

5.3 There is already an approved planning application ref no: 171424 on the site for the removal of ‘The Range’ and ‘Red Lodge’ and to replace them with 6 no dwellings and associated landscape.

5.4 In addition, to the south west located adjacent to the Sonning Golf Club car park is an approved development of 13 dwellings with associated highway works, public open space and landscaping. This was approved at Appeal in 2018 and the inspector noted the following:

5.5 The preliminary landscape and visual assessment has driven some initial proposals that have been based around a number of principles. The layout has been configured to ensure that the majority of existing trees and hedgerows will be retained and enhanced as part of the wider landscape strategy. The Landscape Masterplan demonstrates how green infrastructure has informed the development proposals with existing vegetation along the site boundaries being retained and enhanced to maintain the visual amenity with neighbouring properties. The proposed landscape design provides a ‘gardenesque’

| 25

scheme with a series of communal garden linked together by a sinuous path providing a journey and cohesion to the proposed development

5.6 In terms of visual effects, no short, medium and long-distance views are anticipated to be significantly adversely affected.

5.7 The overall effect on the character and appearance of the landscape would be a balance of limited to no visual effects on views from the local landscape. Overall, therefore with a Slight magnitude of change on a site of Low sensitivity the effect that would be of a Minor Not Significant effect.

26 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

| 27

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

28 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

Methodology

The landscape and visual impact assessment has followed established methodologies practised by the landscape profession and in accordance with ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ 3rd Edition, published by The Landscape Institute and Institute for Environmental Management & Assessment (April 2013). The photography has been undertaken in accordance with the Landscape Institute’s Advice Note 01/11 ‘Photography and Photomontage in Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (January 2011).

The overall extent of the visibility of the proposals was established; this represents the Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) for the development. This was determined through a combination of desk top studies checked with fieldwork analysis, including the walking of most of the public highways and rights of way within the area. The desk top study identified the area from which it could potentially be possible to see a part of the development according to Ordnance Survey topographical information. The fieldwork then refined this area taking into account local features that would prevent these views, for example dense vegetation, local topographical changes, buildings or fences

The study area for the landscape and visual impact assessment was determined by the ZTV exercise. It was estimated that an area of 3.0km would be used for this assessment.

Tables 7.1 to 7.3 below set out the criteria for the assessments of the value and susceptibility of visual receptors (i.e. people) and, in combining these, to determine an overall assessment of visual receptor sensitivity. These are compatible with the principles outlined in paragraphs 6.30 – 6.41 of GLVIA3. Such categories are not strict and receptors may be more or less sensitive within each category depending on the particular circumstances. Table 7.4 sets out the terms and criteria used in the visual impact assessment to describe the magnitude of visual effects

| 29

Table 7.1: Visual Receptor Value Criteria

Value of Location or View Description

Very High or National A scenic view in a landscape that has been designated at a national level, e.g. National Parks or Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, particularly Value views from a national long distance trail or promoted routes in these landscapes, or a recognised view to or from a distinctive feature designated at a national level, e.g. Scheduled Ancient Monument, Listed Building and Registered Historic Park & Garden. High or County Value A view from within a designated landscape or a popular view recognised in publications and/or visitor guides for promoted routes and locations of interest. Moderate or Community A view in an undesignated landscape which may be locally valued and Value displays evidence of responsible use. Low or Unvalued Where the landscape has been despoiled and there is evidence that society does not value the view or landscape Private Value A private view, e.g. from a residential property, that is likely to be valued by the occupants.

Table 7.2: Visual Receptor Susceptibility

Receptor Location Susceptibility Group

Residents High - would view the proposed development in the primary views from their property (e.g. principal living rooms and sitting areas in gardens), would be stationary or moving slowly about their property, would see the development on a daily basis, could be orientated towards the development, and would value these views.

High/Moderate - would view the proposed development in the secondary views from their property (e.g. bedrooms and driveway), would be stationary or moving slowly at these locations, would see the development on a daily basis, could be orientated towards the development, and would value these views.

Moderate - would view the proposed development from limited locations on their property (e.g. bathrooms and attic windows), would be stationary or moving slowly at these locations, would see the development on a daily basis, could be orientated towards the development, and would value these views. Recreational High - are stationery or moving slowly (e.g. walking, cycling or horse riding), Receptors can be orientated towards the development, are at that location primarily in order to enjoy the view/landscape.

High/Moderate - are stationery or moving slowly (e.g. walking, cycling or horse riding), can be orientated towards the development, are at that location primarily in order to enjoy the view/landscape but also for other purposes.

30 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

Moderate - are stationery or moving slowly, can be orientated towards the development, may be at that location in order to enjoy the view/landscape but would have another primary purpose for being there (e.g. playing sport).

Road and rail users High/Moderate – in locations where they are moving steadily/swiftly, can be (motorists, orientated towards the development, are likely to be at that location primarily passengers, bus and in order to enjoy the view/landscape. train travellers) Moderate - in locations where they are moving steadily/swiftly, can be orientated towards the development, may be at that location in order to enjoy the view/landscape but may also have other purposes (e.g. journey to work).

Moderate/Low - in locations where they are moving swiftly, with a direction of travel that is oblique or side-on to the development, are likely to be travelling for a purpose other than in order to enjoy the view (e.g. higher speed long distance travel).

Outdoor workers Moderate - outdoor workers and school children in locations where they may be moving slowly, can be orientated towards the development, may experience the view on a daily basis, may be at that location in order to enjoy the view but will have other purposes.

Medium/Low - outdoor workers in locations where they may be moving slowly, can be orientated towards the development, may experience the view on a daily basis, but are at that location primarily to undertake activities unconnected with the view. Indoor workers Low - indoor receptors with limited views in this direction, who are in that location primarily to undertake activities unconnected with the view.

Table 7.3: Visual Receptor Sensitivity Criteria

Visual Receptor Description Sensitivity Very High Sensitivity Where the receptor would be stationary or moving slowly, would be likely to be exposed for consistent and prolonged periods and/or whose attention or main interest would be likely to be the landscape and views; particularly, but not necessarily limited to, users of promoted Public Rights of Way within landscapes designated at a national level, users of national trails and promoted long distance routes or at heritage assets, in these landscapes or other valued landscapes, where awareness of changes to visual amenity is likely to be acute. High Sensitivity Where the receptor would be stationary, moving slowly or steadily, would be likely to be exposed for consistent and prolonged periods and/or whose attention or interest is likely to include the landscape and views; typically residents at home, users of Public Rights of Way and country lanes, where awareness of changes to visual amenity is likely to be elevated. Moderate Sensitivity Where the receptor would be moving steadily or swiftly, would be likely to be exposed to the change for infrequent and short periods, and/or whose attention and interest may include the landscape or views but not primarily; typically travellers on roads, rail or other transport routes where awareness of change to visual amenity is likely to be limited. Low Sensitivity Where the receptor would be moving swiftly, would be exposed to the change occasionally and for very short periods, and/or whose attention or interest is not on views or landscape; typically people engaged in higher speed travel, engaged in organised outdoor sport (which does not involve an

| 31

appreciation of views) and outdoor workers where the setting may be of importance to the quality of working life. Negligible Sensitivity Where the receptor would be predominantly inside and at their place of work focused on their work activity and where setting is not important to the quality of working life and awareness of change to visual amenity is likely to be negligible.

Table 7.4 Magnitude of Visual Effects Criteria

Magnitude of Change Description Very Substantial Where the proposed development would be perceived to be close to the viewpoint and openly visible in its entirety or near entirety, the development would be in stark contrast to the landscape context such that it would be the dominant feature in the scene. Substantial Where the proposed development would be perceived to be in the near or middle distance and visible in its entirety or partly screened, the development would contrast with the landscape context such that it would stand out as a prominent feature in the scene. Moderate Where the proposed development would be perceived to be in the middle distance and visible in its entirety or partly screened or at closer distances and more considerably screened, the development may contrast with the landscape context such that it would be evident as a noticeable feature in the scene. Slight Where the proposed development would be perceived to be in the distance or far distance and visible in its entirety or partly screened or at closer distances and substantially screened, the development may contrast with the landscape context such that it would be a visible feature in the scene. Negligible Where the proposed development would be perceived to be in the far distance, partly or largely screened or at closer distances and almost entirely screened, the development may contrast with the landscape context such that it would be a barely discernible feature

For landscape character effects, as per the principles outlined in paragraphs 5.38 – 5.57 of GLVIA3, assessments have been made as to landscape value and landscape susceptibility and, in combining these, to determine overall landscape sensitivity. The criteria used for assessing these are reproduced at Tables 7.5 to 7.7 below and the magnitude of landscape effects at Table 7.8.

Table 7.5 Landscape Value Criteria

Landscape Value Description International Value Where the landscape has been designated at an international level, e.g. a World Heritage Appeal Site, and the purposes of which include landscape and/or recreational opportunities.

National Value Where the landscape has been designated at a national level, e.g. National Parks (England, Scotland and Wales), Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (England, Wales and NI), Heritage Coasts (England and Wales), LANDMAP VSAA Outstanding Overall Evaluation (Wales) or where a landscape feature has been designated at a national level, e.g. Scheduled Ancient Monument, and forms a highly distinctive landscape feature. County/District Value Regional Parks, landscape designations in Structure, Unitary or Local Development Plans, LANDMAP VSAA High Overall Evaluation (Wales) or a landscape feature that has been designated at a County/Borough/District level and forms a distinctive landscape feature.

32 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

Local Value For undesignated landscapes and landscape features which are locally valued, LANDMAP VSAA Moderate Overall Evaluation (Wales) and display evidence of responsible use and value. Unvalued Where the landscape and/or landscape features have been despoiled and there is evidence that society does not value the landscape and/or landscape features, e.g. fly tipping, abandoned cars, litter, vandalism, etc.

Table 7.6 Landscape Susceptibility Criteria

Landscape Description Susceptibility

Very Susceptibility Where the clarity of the key characteristics are very strongly expressed and/or their robustness to change is fragile and/or views are an essential characteristic, and/or policies and strategies aim to achieve “no change” to landscape character, and the changes to landscape character that could be brought about by a development of the type, scale and location proposed would be incompatible with these factors. Susceptible Where the clarity of the key characteristics are strongly expressed and/or their robustness to change is weak and/or views are an important characteristic and/or policies and strategies aim to conserve the key characteristics, and the changes to landscape character that could be brought about by a development of the type, scale and location proposed would have a poor compatibility with these factors. Moderate Where the clarity of the key characteristics are clearly expressed and/or their susceptibility robustness to change is moderately strong and/or views contribute to landscape character and/or policies and strategies promote or accept limited changes to key characteristics, and the changes to landscape character that could be brought about by a development of the type, scale and location proposed would have a moderate compatibility with these factors. Slight susceptibility Where the clarity of the key characteristics are vaguely expressed and/or their robustness to change is strong and/or views are incidental to landscape character and/or policies and strategies promote or accept that the landscape could evolve, and the changes to landscape character that could be brought about by a development of the type, scale and location proposed would have a good compatibility with these factors. Negligible Where the key characteristics are muddled and/or their robustness to change is susceptibility very strong and/or views are irrelevant to landscape character and/or policies and strategies promote or accept major changes to key characteristics and the changes to landscape character that could be brought about by a development of the type, scale and location proposed would have excellent compatibility with these factors.

Table 7.7 Landscape Sensitivity Criteria

Landscape Value Description Very High sensitivity A landscape with international or national value and/or with features, elements, areas or special qualities of international or national value, that could be very susceptible to the type, scale and location of development proposed. High sensitivity A landscape with national or County/Borough/District value and/or with features, elements, areas or special qualities of national value, that could be susceptible to the type, scale and location of development proposed.

| 33

Moderate sensitivity A landscape with County/Borough/District or local value and/or with features, elements, areas or special qualities of County/Borough/District or local value, that could have a moderate susceptibility to the type, scale and location of development proposed. Low sensitivity A landscape with local value and/or with features, elements, areas or special qualities of local value, that could have a slight susceptibility to the type, scale and location of development proposed. Negligible sensitivity A landscape that is unvalued and/or with features, elements, areas or special qualities that are unvalued, and that could have a negligible susceptibility to the type, scale and location of development proposed.

Table 7.8 Magnitude of Landscape Effects Criteria

Magnitude of Change Description Very Substantial Where the proposals would become a defining characteristic of the adverse (or beneficial) landscape, would override and be in stark contrast with (or would substantially enhance) the existing landscape context, would be in the context of no similar developments (or would reinstate particularly valued features that had been previously lost or degraded) and would be a dominant additional feature(s).

Substantial adverse Where the proposals would become a key characteristic of the landscape, (or beneficial) would compete with and detract from (or enhance) the existing landscape context, would be in the context of few similar developments (or would reinstate particularly valued features that had been previously lost or degraded) and would be a prominent additional feature(s). Moderate adverse (or Where the proposals would become a characteristic of the landscape and beneficial) would contrast with (or complement) the existing landscape context, may be in the context of a few similar developments (and/or would reinstate valued features that had been previously lost or degraded) and would be a noticeable additional feature(s). Slight adverse (or Where the proposals would become a characteristic of the landscape and beneficial) would contrast with (or complement) the existing landscape context, may be in the context of some similar developments (and/or would reinstate features that had been previously lost or degraded) and would be a visible additional feature(s). Negligible adverse (or Where the proposals) may contrast with (or would complement) the existing beneficial) landscape context, may be in the context of several similar developments (and/or would reinstate minor features that had been previously lost or degraded) and would be a barely discernible additional feature(s).

What constitutes a significant effect; the meaning of a significant effect in a broad planning context; and what weight should be attached to it, are all matters which do not have any specific definition in any related guidance. GLVIA3 requires the process of the assessment of significance to be clearly defined for each EIA project and to be expressed as transparently as possible. It defines (at Table 5.10 of the GLVIA3) a sliding scale of significance (for landscape effects) and, at Table 7.9 below, a matrix is used to help structure the overall assessment of the significance of landscape or visual effect when the magnitude of change is combined with sensitivity, together with the degree of significance that applies. The gradation invites the decision-maker to consider the amount of weight that should be applied based on the degree of significance as part of the planning balance. However, also identified are those effects which are considered to be significant in the terms required for assessment by the EIA Regulations (those highlighted

34 |

Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

in bold type and in the darker blue shaded boxes) as distinct from those which are not and the reasoning is set out within the narrative of the assessment.

Table 7.9 Overall Assessment of Landscape and Visual Effects Criteria (Significance)

Magnitude of change Receptor/ Very Substantial Moderate Slight Negligible character Substantial area sensitivity Very High Major ++ Major + Major Major - Moderate Moderate High Major + Major Major - Moderate Moderate - Minor Moderate Moderate Major Major - Moderate Moderate - Minor Moderate Minor Low Major - Moderate Moderate - Minor Minor - Negligible Moderate Minor

Negligible Moderate Moderate - Minor Minor - Negligible Minor Negligible

Key

Significant effect Potentially significant effect considered with other viewpoint effect evaluations Not a significant effect

| 35

APPENDIX B: National Character Area Profile: Thames Valley (NCA115)

36 |

National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

www.gov.uk/natural-england

1 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.

NCA profiles are working documents which draw on current evidence and knowledge. We will aim to refresh and update them periodically as new 1 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, Defra information becomes available to us. (2011; URL: www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf) 2 Biodiversity 2020: A Strategy for England’s Wildlife and Ecosystem Services, Defra We would like to hear how useful the NCA profiles are to you. You can contact (2011; URL: www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13583-biodiversity-strategy-2020-111111.pdf) 3 European Landscape Convention, Council of Europe the NCA team by emailing [email protected]. (2000; URL: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm)

2 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Summary

The Thames Valley is a mainly low-lying, wedge-shaped area, widening from Centuries of wealthy and influential residents have left a legacy of historic Reading, which includes Slough, Windsor, the Colne Valley and the south- houses and palaces in the Thames Valley, such as Windsor Castle and west London fringes. The River Thames provides a unifying feature through Hampton Court Palace, all of which are now valued for their heritage interest a very diverse landscape of urban and suburban settlements, infrastructure and attract thousands of visitors. Many are set within historic parkland, networks, fragmented agricultural land, historic parks, commons, woodland, which is a particular feature of the NCA. Opportunities exist to improve the reservoirs and extensive minerals workings. management of the 6,950 ha of registered parkland and to protect the veteran trees surviving within it. There are also opportunities for the improvement of Hydrological features dominate the Thames Valley, and include the Thames and its small but valuable areas of heathland like Wimbledon Common SAC. tributaries, part of the Grand Union Canal and the reservoirs which form the South- West London Waterbodies Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site. These The Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew (a UNESCO World Heritage Site) fall within features provide essential water supply services for London and the surrounds, the Thames Valley NCA and provide engagement opportunities, as well as as well as being important areas for wildlife and recreation in an essentially being a centre for biodiversity. There are a number of nationally important urban landscape. Flows and water levels in the River Thames are managed by geological sites within the NCA, as well as Heathrow, the UK’s busiest airport. a series of locks and structures upstream of Teddington. Flood defence and water quality improvement measures, such as the restoration of wetlands for Although there is virtually no undisturbed land in the NCA, parts are valued flood management, provide opportunities for biodiversity and recreation. for their relative tranquillity. The area’s natural beauty and royal Despite its urban character, the area is environmentally important and 6 history have created a haven on the per cent per cent of it is covered by its 38 Sites of Special Scientific Interest doorstep of central London, a place to (SSSI). It has significant amounts of broadleaved woodland, much of it escape, relax, exercise, explore and ancient, including Burnham Beeches, Windsor Forest and Great Park, and the have fun. Its 1,000 km of rights of way Richmond Park Special Area of Conservation (SAC). – including the Thames Path National Trail – three National Nature Reserves There has been much development in this area in recent history, and (NNRs), waterbodies and green space, continued pressures within the next 20 years provide scope for creating new all provide recreation opportunities landscapes with good green infrastructure links and increased broadleaved and access to nature for a population of woodland. This will help to reduce noise and air pollution, and reduce the around 1.4 million, as well as to visitors impact of urban fringe development. The closure and restoration of landfill from inner London and beyond. Click map to enlarge; click again to reduce sites and mineral workings provide additional opportunities.

3 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Statements of Environmental Opportunities:

■■ SEO 1: Plan for the enhancement of the area’s rivers, and the expansion of ■■ SEO 5: Develop the recreational, educational and commercial tourism their operational flood plains and associated wetland habitats, aiding the opportunities offered by public access to – and engagement with – the regulation of water flow, improving water quality, benefiting biodiversity, historic buildings and landscapes in the area, such as Hampton Court and reinforcing cultural heritage and landscape. Palace, Windsor Castle and the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, for their contribution to a sense of place and to people’s enjoyment and ■■ SEO 2: Plan for the landscape-scale enhancement of the area’s extensive understanding of the area. gravel workings and other open waterbodies (including reservoirs) forming part of the South-West London Waterbodies Special Protection Area, for their contribution to water supply and storage, for their important habitats and recreation facilities, and for their geological interest.

■■ SEO 3: Maintain existing greenspace and plan for the creation of green infrastructure associated with the significant projected growth of urban areas, to reduce the impact of development, to help reduce flooding issues, and to strengthen access and recreation opportunities. Seek links from urban areas to wider recreation assets such as the Thames Path National Trail, National Cycle Routes, and the river and canal network, and promote the incorporation of best practice environmental measures into any new development.

■■ SEO 4: Protect and manage the area’s historic parklands, wood pastures, ancient woodland, commons, orchards and distinctive ancient pollards, and restore and increase woodland for carbon sequestration, noise and pollution reduction, woodfuel and protection from soil erosion, while also enhancing biodiversity, sense of place and history. Teddington Weir.

4 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Description

Physical and functional links to other National Character Areas

The catchment of the River Thames and its tributaries drain from the surrounding areas and provide strong links with many of the neighbouring NCAs. Rivers feed in from the Chilterns NCA (including the Chilterns chalk aquifer) to the north, the Thames Basin Heaths NCA and Thames Basin Lowlands NCA to the south, and the Northern Thames Basin NCA to the north- east (and also the Thames headwaters in the Cotswolds). The Thames then runs out through the Inner London NCA and into the Greater Thames Estuary NCA.

The Thames Valley NCA is dissected by major transport links that connect London to the west, including the M4, M40, the London orbital (M25), and the Paddington main line to the west, as well as a plethora of A-roads linking the main urban areas. It also includes nearly 35 km of the Grand Union Canal, linking London to the Midlands. These links, and the area’s geographical proximity to London, make the Thames Valley vital to the capital in terms of recreation and provision of resources. The area plays a key part in the flood defence strategy for central London, and the river and its reservoirs supply most of the city’s water needs.

There are views of the Chilterns and North Wessex Downs to the west, while, further east, the view of St Paul’s cathedral from Richmond Park is protected –

an example of the important connections between this area and the capital. Red deer stag in Richmond Park.

5 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Key characteristics

■■ Flat and low-lying land, rising to low, river-terraced hills, which include corridor), Heathrow Airport, railway lines, golf courses, pylon lines, the prominent local outcrop of chalk on which Windsor Castle sits. reservoirs, extensive mineral extraction and numerous flooded gravel pits.

■■ The underlying geology is dominated by the London Clay which, over ■■ There are small but biologically important areas of lowland heathland – much of the area, is overlain by river-lain sands and gravels. especially on higher sandy ground in the north – and a small area to the south falls within the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA) ■■ The numerous hydrological features provide unity to an area which buffer zone. otherwise lacks homogeny; these features include the River Thames and its tributaries, streams, lakes, canals and open waterbodies (the ■■ To the south, the open Thames flood plain dominates, with its associated result of restored gravel workings). flat grazing land, becoming characterised by a number of formal historic landscapes on higher ground. Between Hampton and Kew, the River ■■ Woodlands characterise the north-western area, with the wooded Thames forms the focus of a series of designed landscapes. character extending up to the southern edge of the Chiltern Hills. ■■ The area has an urban character, and there are very few villages of more ■■ Farming is limited. Where it survives, grazed pasture is the major land use traditional character, although almost half of the area is greenbelt land within a generally open, flat and featureless landscape. The field pattern and development has been restricted in areas like Crown Estate land is medium-scale and irregular, with smaller fields to the west. Localised and Eton College grounds. areas of species-rich hay meadows provide a splash of colour in summer. ■■ The river is closely associated with numerous historic places and cultural ■■ Although densely populated and developed, pockets of woodland, events, such as the signing of Magna Carta at Runnymede. Tourists from open grassland, parkland, wetlands and intimate meadows provide all over the world are drawn to the rich heritage of the area, flocking to escape and tranquillity, and include a variety of habitats supporting attractions like Hampton Court Palace and Windsor Castle. important populations of many species, notably stag beetle, shoveler, gadwall and other invertebrates and wildfowl. ■■ The area is important for recreation, both for residents and visitors. Historic parkland and commons provide access to green space, the ■■ Towards London in the east, the natural character of the area is overtaken Thames Path National Trail runs the length of the NCA, and a variety of by urban influences: a dense network of roads (including the M25 activities are enjoyed on the river and other waterbodies.

6 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Thames Valley today

The Thames Valley is the principal western approach to London. The area is Further south, the Thames Valley is edged by wooded ridges and rolling steeped in history and bound by the sweeping meanders of the main rivers farmland. The central and northern parts are dominated by medium-sized and major arterial transport routes. riverside towns such as Maidenhead, with many private rural houses.

The underlying geology is dominated by the London Clay, giving rise to the heavy (and in places waterlogged) soils typical of much of the central part of the area. This is overlain by a complex sequence of sands and gravels that form the Thames flood plain, and a more complex record of river terraces that are important in understanding both the archaeological and more recent geological history of the area.

In the south-west, the gently rolling valley sides give way to a flatter plain east of Reading, which widens to include the Slough and Windsor areas. Much of this area is near flood level, although Slough lies on slightly terraced land above the flood plain and Windsor Castle sits on a prominent local outcrop of chalk.

Further north, the land is underlain by the edge of the Chilterns chalk aquifer and reflects the rolling hills of the nearby Chilterns. As the Thames approaches London in north Surrey, the flood plain is bounded in the distance to the south and west by low, wooded hills in the adjoining Thames Basin Heaths NCA.

In the centre, the open Thames flood plain dominates. This grazed pasture includes a number of designed parklands on higher ground. South of this are clay vales characterised by large, regular field patterns and small woods. Thames Path between Barge Farm and Bray Lock, looking towards the village of Bray.

7 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

The wealth of the area over a long period, and its natural scenic attractions, The area along the river between Hampton and Kew reflects its royal have left an overall atmosphere of sophistication that heightens along the patronage. The Thames forms the focus within a series of formally designed Thames and especially at Windsor, with its Great Park characterised by rides, landscapes and fine historic houses, including Hampton Court Palace and ancient woodland and ancient pollard trees. Windsor Forest and Great Park, Marble Hill House. as well as Richmond Park, are recognised internationally as being important for wildlife – particularly invertebrates, and notably violet click and stag beetle. Both have been designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Richmond Park has also been designated as a National Nature Reserve (NNR).

Water is the unifying characteristic of the area and the Thames Path National Trail runs through its entire length. As well as the Thames and its tributaries, around Slough, the Colne Valley and areas further east, the overwhelming influences are from lakes left from mineral workings and vast raised reservoirs. This NCA provides most of the clean water for London and is important for wildlife. Over 800 ha of its waterbodies are internationally designated for their importance to breeding and wintering wildfowl; this area is known as the South-West London Waterbodies SPA.

Major roads (such as the M4, M40 and M25 motorways), Heathrow Airport and railways all contribute to the wealth of the area, but also give it a feeling of patchiness. The areas around these routes are surrounded by storage facilities and industrial units.

Rapid development has often left new structures and buildings unrelated to the landscape around them. Open spaces, many of them golf courses, are interspersed. The overall impression is of a lack of cohesiveness, although older villages and woodlands survive in surprising seclusion, and areas such Ancient Oak, Windsor Great Park. as those owned by the Crown and Eton College have been preserved.

8 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

The landscape through time roads and camps around the Wimbledon and Staines areas. Windsor Castle was built by the Normans for defensive purposes soon after the Conquest. The NCA forms the western part of the London Basin, a syncline bounded During the reign of Henry I it became a royal residence and the area began to to the north by the chalk hills of the Chilterns and to the south by the North flourish under royal patronage. Runnymede, considered to be neutral ground Downs. Chalk, deposited in an extensive shallow sea during the Cretaceous, between Windsor and London, was selected for sealing Magna Carta in 1215. underlies the NCA today, forming an aquifer and, in the north, a series of low hills, including the hill on which Windsor Castle sits. The Chalk is overlain As medieval London expanded, the surrounding countryside became tamed by Cenozoic clays and sands, most notably the marine London Clay, which to support the growing population. In its natural state the River Thames has led to the heavy and waterlogged soils typical of much of the NCA and would have been shallow and meandering, flowing through a wide bed of underlying areas such as Richmond Park. river gravels below Richmond Hill. This would easily have flooded across an extensive flood plain of marsh, reedbed, wet woodland and swamp extending Much of the area is overlain by a complex sequence of Quaternary river-lain inland for many miles. As settlement spread, wetlands were drained and the sands and gravels. These were deposited by the Thames as its course altered in river corridor was modified to allow easier navigation, causing the tide to response to ice-age warming and cooling. Most notable was the Anglian ice age, extend much further upstream than was natural. Before Teddington Lock was when ice advanced to the immediate north of the area, pushing the River Thames built (1810–12), the Thames was tidal as far as Staines. Agriculture thrived on the into its present-day course. The complex sequence of river terraces associated rich soils and, more recently, large areas of the flood plain were built on. with the evolution of the Thames since this period have left the hillside terraced landscape characteristic of much of the NCA. These free-draining sands, gravels By the 15th century large tracts of woodland were managed to provide timber, and associated soils have been important for market gardening and fruit growing, charcoal and oak bark. Commercial activities on the Thames included fishing for the development of heathland and for numerous gravel extraction sites. (particularly eel trapping), coppicing willows and osiers, and the operation of watermills for flour production, paper production and metal beating. The area is rich in archaeological remains, including the iron-age hill fort at Bulstrode Park, a Mesolithic site at Braywick near Maidenhead, bronze- Following the construction of Richmond Palace and Hampton Court Palace during and iron-age earthworks around Burnham Beeches, and many important Tudor times, the landscape began to evolve as successive aristocratic families Neolithic and bronze-age sites, particularly along the river.4 moved to the area or adapted their medieval estates in the modern style. Great houses were constructed along the river amid the water meadows and woodland. The strategic importance of the Thames made it an ideal route way and base for early invaders. In the first years of their campaign, the Romans built bridges, Proximity to London ensured the prosperity of the area and provided a refuge 4 Needham p (1985) Neolithic and Bronze Age Settlement on the Buried Floodplains of Runnymede. Oxford Journal of Archaeology

9 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

from the dirt, disease and noise of the city. In the 18th century especially, the area of trees and orchards around the small villages. The scale, speed and range attracted the most influential thinkers, poets, artists and landscape designers of of development have left little sense of continuity. Yet there remain ‘lost the day. Inspired by the Thames and, notably, by the view from Richmond Hill, villages’ where the relationship between village and immediate landscape a radical new way of perceiving beauty in the landscape was born. Alexander survive intact. In 1880 the Corporation of London bought Burnham Beeches Pope’s garden at Twickenham claims to be the origin of the English Landscape to protect it from development and maintain it as a public space, reflecting movement, and the landscape has provided continued inspiration for some of the area’s importance as an amenity for the population of London. England’s greatest artists and writers. J M W Turner painted some of his best-loved works here and Shakespeare shows familiarity with the locality in his The Merry The farmed landscape has become extremely limited due to demands made Wives of Windsor. It also inspired poets such as Wordsworth. Meanwhile, Horace on it by reservoirs, gravel pits, and recreational uses such as pony paddocks Walpole’s house at Strawberry Hill was one of the most influential individual and golf courses. Once an important area for fruit production, being the examples of Georgian ‘gothick’ architecture. It was also a time of science, and the birthplace of famous varieties such as the Cox’s Orange Pippin, 40 per cent Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew were created in 1759. From 1773, under Sir Joseph of the fruit-growing area was lost between 1990 and 1998, and orchards now Banks, the gardens established their international reputation as a centre not only lie derelict or await development. Reclamation of disused mineral extraction for botanical collections, but also for economic botany, exploring the practical sites has resulted in large expanses of lake and wetland, which are valuable relevance of newly discovered specimens from the new colonies. The river and recreational resources as well as providing important habitats for wildlife. other parts of the area became foci for development with villas, ornamental parks The area remains a popular leisure amenity area, used for a wide range of and residential development, from the mid 19th century especially. activities such as boating, angling, walking and horse-riding.

The Thames was the principal means of transportation between London and While much of the Thames Valley is now developed, influenced by transport the west until the 19th century. The Great Western Railway mainline, which infrastructure, or altered by the extraction of aggregates, it is still possible ran through the area, and the completion of the M4 along a similar route in to appreciate the verdant and productive landscape that attracted royalty 1971, both ensured that the NCA continues to benefit from this role today. and nobility. The view from Windsor Castle described by William Camden in 1586, although fragmented, can still be found and experienced in the ancient The area’s proximity to London has led to relentless development, particularly woodlands, meadows, parklands and productive agriculture of the area: during the 20th century. There have been several attempts to curb the spread of London since the time of Elizabeth I, but the principle of greenbelt was “It gazes down over the prospect of a wide and far-reaching vale, patterned not firmly established until 1947. Nearly half of the NCA is designated as with ploughland, green with its meadows, clad here and there with greenbelt land, characterised by some remnants of agriculture or market woodlands, and watered by the softly flowing Thames. Behind it the hills rise gardening. Nevertheless, the east has been drastically altered by the spread all around, neither rough nor very high, but crowned with woods as though of outer London. The first-edition Ordnance Survey maps of 1865 show an Nature herself had dedicated them to the chase.” open, farmed landscape of regular fields, relatively treeless but with groups

10 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Ecosystem services largest single licence is used to supply the Lower Thames reservoirs, to meet the water needs of London. Of all the rivers in the NCA, only the Loddon (east The Thames Valley NCA provides a wide range of benefits to society. Each is of Reading) is classed as having water available for abstraction. derived from the attributes and processes (both natural and cultural features) within the area. These benefits are known collectively as ‘ecosystem services’. ■ Genetic diversity: The NCA contains the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, The predominant services are summarised below. Further information on which were awarded UNESCO World Heritage Site status in 2003 – partly ecosystem services provided in the Thames Valley NCA is contained in the for their uninterrupted role as a centre of plant research, but also for ‘Analysis’ section of this document. their unique collections of living and stored material. The Great Vine at Hampton Court Palace is the oldest and largest known vine in the world. Provisioning services (food, fibre and water supply) A few remnant orchards also contain the genetic material of local fruit ■ Food provision: The gravel beds of the upper tideway are an important varieties, such as Cox’s Orange Pippin, first developed in this area. nursery ground for several species of North Sea fish, notably flounder. The spread of urban areas has reduced agricultural land within the NCA Regulating services (water purification, air quality maintenance and to under 25 per cent per cent. The NCA now produces a limited range of climate regulation) crops and livestock. ■ Regulating water quality: Where assessed (for compliance with the Water Framework Directive), groundwater quality is generally poor, as ■ Biomass energy: The potential yield for miscanthus is predominantly high is river chemical quality – including for the River Colne in the east and throughout, while for short rotation coppice it is predominantly medium. the Thames. Almost all of this NCA’s rivers are classed as achieving only The existing woodland cover (13 per cent per cent) offers potential for moderate ecological status or potential, with one or two small stretches biomass through managing woodland, although woodland is concentrated classed as either good or poor. in the north of the area and is missing from much of the NCA. ■ Regulating water flow: Flood regulation is a key issue throughout, with ■ Water availability: The north of the NCA is underlain by the edge of the flood risk affecting numerous settlements. Locks and weirs maintain Chilterns chalk aquifer and chalk streams feed into the water supply. water levels along the Thames, and can be fully opened when flows Overall, the area is under considerable pressure to supply London and the increase, to minimise impact. The Thames Catchment Flood Management surrounding area. Water sources have been assessed as either over-abstracted Plan identifies that further action needs to be taken to reduce flood risk or having no availability for abstraction. Most of the area’s demand for water throughout the area, with policies that include measures to store water or is met by the Thames, with most licences being for public water supply. The manage run-off while also providing environmental benefits.

11 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Cultural services (inspiration, education and wellbeing) and Richmond, are highly distinctive features, as are characteristic ■ Sense of place/inspiration: A sense of place is supported by the presence of veteran pollards – important elements in fields, hedgerows and parkland. water throughout the area, in the form of the River Thames and its tributaries, as well as numerous open waterbodies that are the result of gravel workings ■ Recreation: Recreation is supported by over 1,000 km of rights of way and reservoirs. The view of St Paul’s cathedral from King Henry’s Mound (a density of 1.19 km per km2), including the Thames Path National in Richmond Park, created in 1710, is a protected view, an example of the Trail, as well as by the area’s parklands, greens, commons, woodlands important connections between this area and the capital. The landscape and waterbodies (with private recreation evident in numerous golf is described in the works of some of the most famous writers in English courses throughout the area). Sailing, watersports and angling are all literature, including Shakespeare, Jerome K Jerome and Sir Walter Scott. It popular pursuits on the River Thames, and on many reservoirs and other has also inspired great artists such as J M W Turner and Joshua Reynolds, as waterbodies. Commons and other open access land provide recreational well as poets including Alexander Pope. William Wordsworth described the opportunities in places such as Chertsey Meads and Staines Moor, along nightingales (for which the area was famed) as ‘the quire of Richmond Hill, with three of London’s National Nature Reserves: Ruislip Woods, Burnham chanting with indefatigable bill’. The ‘Arcadian Thames’ area around Richmond Beeches and Richmond Park. There are also several accessible historic and Twickenham is the birthplace of the English Landscape movement. parks in the north, including Denham and Black Park Country Parks. Most Walpole’s house at Strawberry Hill is internationally recognised as the finest of the 108-kilometre Thames Valley National Cycle Route between London surviving example of Georgian ‘gothick’ and an inspiration for the Gothic and Oxford runs through the NCA, and National Cycle Route 61 runs along Revival. The historic parkland, veteran trees and rich biodiversity reflect the the length of the Jubilee River. All of the above contribute to the health and NCA’s long history as an area of recreation and escape on the edge of London. wellbeing of the large population of this predominantly urban NCA.

■ Sense of history: Historic buildings include large houses set within their ■ Biodiversity: The diversity of geology has resulted in a variety of habitats own grounds, along with traditional black timber-framed farm buildings. and land uses across the area, including heathland over acidic sands Windsor Castle sits atop its chalk outcrop by the Thames, while other north of Slough, large areas of woodland over the clays (notably Windsor internationally renowned buildings along the river include Hampton Forest in the south and Burnham Beeches in the north), extensive gravel Court Palace and the Palm House at Kew. The river is closely associated workings along the flood plain and an outcrop of chalk at Windsor. The with important historic and cultural events, including the attachment of meadows and pastures of the river valleys are important for wading the Great Seal to Magna Carta at Runnymede in 1215, and the death of birds: lapwing, snipe, curlew and redshank breed in the area, and in Elizabeth I at Richmond. Historic parklands, such as Dropmore, Langley winter large numbers of lapwing and golden plover are attracted to the

12 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

flood plain. Scrub and woodland near water is important for songbirds, notably nightingale. Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) priority habitat covers around 6 per cent per cent of the NCA: this includes over 2,500 ha of woodland and around 2,000 ha of other wetland habitat, as well as small but important areas of lowland heathland. Over 800 ha of waterbodies within the area are internationally designated as SPA and Ramsar sites for their importance for various wildfowl, for example Northern shoveler, gadwall and 7.8 per cent of the British population of overwintering smew. There are four SAC covering over 3,000 ha and noted particularly for invertebrate interest. Around 7,000 ha of historic parkland across the NCA provide a rich variety of habitats. Windsor Great Park is widely regarded as the foremost site in the United Kingdom for invertebrates and fungi associated with wood pasture and parkland. A small part of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA buffer zone lies within the NCA, south of Windsor.

■ Geodiversity: Geodiversity strongly influences the character of the area, including its topography, habitat distribution and land use. Most notable are the influence on water supply of underlying sediments and structures, and the numerous examples of sand and gravel extraction across the area. The area is particularly important for understanding landscape evolution over the last 400,000 years: this period saw the maximum advance of the Anglian ice sheet, forcing the River Thames southwards into its current course. The subsequent evolution of the Thames is documented in the complex sequence of river terraces, which are also intimately linked to understanding the archaeological history of the area.

View from Richmond Hill across Petersham Meadows and the Thames.

13 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Statements of Environmental Opportunity

SEO 1: Plan for the enhancement of the area’s rivers, and the expansion of their operational flood plains and associated wetland habitats, aiding the regulation of water flow, improving water quality, benefiting biodiversity, and reinforcing cultural heritage and landscape.

For example, by: ■■ Restoring natural river geomorphology where it brings benefits for ■■ Forming corridors using restored rivers to link sites that benefit wildlife, biodiversity, and regulating the flow of water – where necessary enabling greater movement of species. Also incorporating access maintaining modifications that allow for recreational activities. provision to allow for the movement of people. ■■ Improving the maintenance of rivers and ordinary watercourses feeding ■■ Working with farmers, landowners and interest groups within and into the Thames, and supporting river improvement initiatives within and beyond the NCA to promote the use of soil and nutrient management beyond the NCA, such as the Chilterns Chalk Streams Project. plans, and to raise awareness of codes of best practice. ■■ Bringing rivers back into continuity with their flood plains, and allowing the seasonal inundation of land where it will contribute to flood alleviation and benefit biodiversity. ■■ Providing compensatory flood plain areas where the natural flood plain has been lost to development or ground-raising. ■■ Protecting, restoring and expanding meadows and other wetland habitats on flood plains, to create robust networks that enhance biodiversity and landscape, while helping to alleviate downstream flooding and improving water quality. ■■ Restoring and managing wet woodlands, including riverside willows and belts of poplar along the Thames flood plain, improving biodiversity and the regulation of water flows, and providing a local source of woodfuel.

■■ Ensuring that scrub and woodland is maintained to provide a habitat for The Thames at Reading. songbirds – particularly nightingale, which was once a key species in this area.

14 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

SEO 2: Plan for the landscape-scale enhancement of the area’s extensive gravel workings and other open waterbodies (including reservoirs) forming part of the South-West London Waterbodies Special Protection Area, for their contribution to water supply and storage, for their important habitats and recreation facilities, and for their geological interest.

For example, by: ■■Focusing biodiversity improvements on areas such as Loddon Valley ■■Developing restorative management of Local Geological Sites, offering Gravel Pits, Bray to Eton Pits and Meadows, Colne Valley Gravel Pits and opportunities for volunteering and community engagement while Reservoirs, Thorpe and Shepperton, and Molesey and Hersham. encouraging an appreciation of the palaeontological resource. ■■Creating attractive new wetlands linking with wider wetland habitats on flood plains, to aid flood management in areas such as the Lower Thames and Kennet Valley. Creating a robust network of wildlife habitats, benefiting biodiversity, reinforcing landscape character and helping to regulate water quality. ■■Managing the risk of spreading non-native invasive species to new sites through human activity, for example by promoting the ‘Check, Clean, Dry’ campaign.5 ■■Where appropriate, incorporating features to support recreational pursuits such as bird-watching, sailing, fishing and walking, to encourage engagement with nature, to contribute to the health and wellbeing of the population, and to boost the local economy. ■■Encouraging imaginative solutions to conflicts between various activities, should these arise. ■■Protecting the surviving geological heritage of the area by conserving important geological exposures, improving the condition of existing sites, and maintaining features and exposures. Improving access where appropriate, to promote an understanding and enjoyment of London Wetland Centre. geodiversity and of its importance in forming the landscape.

5 https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/nonnativespecies/checkcleandry/index.cfm

15 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

SEO 3: Maintain existing greenspace and plan for the creation of green infrastructure associated with the significant projected growth of urban areas, to reduce the impact of development, to help reduce flooding issues, and to strengthen access and recreation opportunities. Seek links from urban areas to wider recreation assets such as the Thames Path National Trail, National Cycle Routes, and the river and canal network, and promote the incorporation of best practice environmental measures into any new development.

For example, by: ■■Creating multi-functional natural green space surrounding new the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. development, linking into the heart of urban areas as part of ■■Promoting the incorporation of sustainable urban drainage systems to comprehensive green infrastructure planning. This provides the wider reduce flood risk, and water conservation measures to support water benefits of enhancing the landscape and reducing the ‘heat island’ resources and to manage demand. effect, as well as aiding water regulation, carbon sequestration, and ■■Encouraging initiatives that support rural businesses and the viability of habitat adaptation to climate change through the creation of robust farming in the area, and that provide opportunities for local populations habitat networks, and also supporting the local provision of woodfuel. to engage with the natural environment. ■■Protecting and maintaining semi-urban green spaces such as commons, ■■Using green space creation and tree planting to buffer noise, reduce village greens and churchyards as areas for community engagement air and noise pollution, reduce soil erosion, improve water quality and with nature, exercise and biodiversity. enhance perceptions of tranquillity. ■■Encouraging the introduction of measures to encourage biodiversity, ■■Extending and improving existing rights of way and cycle networks to such as enhanced habitat provision within urban developments (for provide better links between – and access to – green space and heritage example bat roosts and swift nest boxes). assets. ■■Incorporating recreational green space for the health and wellbeing of ■■Ensuring that spatial planning and design for urban development and residents and visitors. infrastructure aim to reduce surface water run-off, protect and restore ■■Creating sustainably-managed broadleaved woodlands along transport habitats, improve the quality of rivers and groundwater, and so protect corridors, improving noise reduction, air quality and assimilation into drinking water supplies. the landscape, while benefiting biodiversity and climate regulation. ■■Creating new wetlands as part of sustainable urban drainage systems, ■■Ensuring that development and its associated infrastructure (including particularly in the Lower Thames area. Linking with wider wetlands light and noise) do not intrude on the wider landscape – particularly on within flood plains to aid flood management, create a robust wildlife heritage assets, surviving small-scale villages and the special qualities of habitat, regulate water quality and benefit biodiversity.

16 Ecosystem services

National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

SEO 4: Protect and manage the area’s historic parklands, wood pastures, ancient woodland, commons, orchards and distinctive ancient pollards, and restore and increase woodland for carbon sequestration, noise and pollution reduction, woodfuel and protection from soil erosion, while also enhancing biodiversity, sense of place and history.

For example by: ■■ Restoring and sustainably managing the area’s historic parkland and wood extending the range of activities such as orienteering, bushcraft, cycling pasture. and nature trails – but only where these do not intrude on the character of ■■ Identifying and creating a new generation of pollards. Reintroducing the park, or damage nature or heritage assets. pollard management where appropriate, to aid adaptation to the more ■■ Restoring, expanding and sustainably managing woodlands, including extreme weather conditions resulting from climate change, benefiting the ancient woodland, for the prevention of soil erosion, carbon sequestration landscape, the cultural heritage and biodiversity. and storage, recreation, enhancing biodiversity and landscape, and ■■ Restoring and sustainably managing traditional orchards where providing a local source of woodfuel. economically viable, using local fruit tree varieties. ■■ Ensuring that access to the ancient woodland, veteran trees and other ■■ Conserving characteristic ancient trees in hedgerows, fields, historic environmentally sensitive sites provides equality of opportunity and parklands and areas of wood pasture. a connection with nature and history, without causing damage or ■■ Restoring hedgerow field boundaries, especially to impede cross-land degradation to these unique assets. water flows within river catchments, prevent nutrient leaching and soil erosion, and form bridging gaps in the wildlife network. Also maintaining and restoring historic field patterns. ■■ Exploiting the growing popularity of ‘green’ and woodland burials to create broadleaved habitat and links between sites in areas where this would otherwise be very difficult. ■■ Maintaining and enhancing core strategic assets such as the Thames Path, Windsor Great Park, Langley Park, Denham Country Park, Richmond Park and Burnham Beeches within the wider network of local sites, rights of way

and promoted routes. Hornbeam Pollards, Mad Bess Woods, Ruislip Woods. ■■ Advertising the benefits offered by the area’s accessible parkland and

17 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

SEO 5: Develop the recreational, educational and commercial tourism opportunities offered by public access to – and engagement with – the historic buildings and landscapes in the area, such as Hampton Court Palace, Windsor Castle and the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, for their contribution to a sense of place and to people’s enjoyment and understanding of the area.

For example by: ■■ Including extensions to public right-of-way networks and cycle routes where this provides strategic links between assets, and creating short- amenity routes or improved access to green spaces. ■■ Maintaining and restoring traditional buildings, including weather boarded timber-framed farm buildings in the western clay vale. ■■ Protecting heritage assets (particularly those at risk) through sensitive incorporation into new development, to encourage engagement with local populations and to reinforce a sense of place. ■■ Encouraging the dispersal of visitor pressures through investment in high-quality infrastructure designed to meet the different needs and levels of use of all visitors, including local communities, recreational day-trippers and tourists. ■■ Encouraging sensitivity in development, particularly along the river, to avoid causing any detriment to the character of the historic features and landscape. ■■ Working with farmers, landowners and local authorities to encourage educational initiatives (such as open farms, improved access and interpretation) that promote engagement with the local environment and develop cultural identity and awareness.

Hampton Court Palace.

18 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Additional opportunity

1. Manage and enhance the area’s heathland and dry unimproved grassland habitats by restoring and expanding existing areas and linking sites.

For example by: ■■ Restoring and re-linking areas of lowland heathland to restore the extent and condition of this important resource and enhance adaptation to climate change, while also improving groundwater quality within the area and assisting in climate regulation through the storage of soil carbon. ■■ Restoring and expanding lowland dry acid grassland and (dry) lowland meadows, and connect with wide grassland buffer strips running across slopes and adjacent to watercourses, to help impede cross-land flows and improve water quality. ■■ Restoring and re-linking areas of lowland heathland on higher sandy ground in the north, especially within the South Bucks Heaths and Parklands Biodiversity Opportunity Area, to restore the extent and condition of this important resource. ■■ Working with the Thames Basin Heaths Joint Strategic Partnership to co- ordinate heathland restoration and encourage measures to avoid any adverse impact on the SPA.

Meadows between Thames and Magna Carta Memorial, Runnymede.

19 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Supporting document 1: Key facts and data

Total area: 86,062 ha National Site of Special A total of 38 sites wholly or 5,036 6 Scientific Interest partly within the NCA (SSSI) 1. Landscape and nature conservation designations Source: Natural England (2011) The Thames Valley, covering parts of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Surrey Please note: (i) Designated areas may overlap (ii) all figures are cut to Mean High Water Line, and Hertfordshire as well as part of Greater London, includes part of the designations that span coastal areas/views below this line will not be included. North Wessex Downs and the Chilterns Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) - covering 158 ha and 114 ha respectively. South West London Waterbodies Ramsar and SPA are coterminous. Richmond Park and part of Burnham Breeches are also NNRs and all of these are also Management Plans for the protected landscape(s) can be found at: designated SSSIs. ■ www.chilternsaonb.org/ ■ www.northwessexdowns.org.uk/ There are 469 local sites within The Thames Valley covering 11,221 ha, or 13 Source: Natural England (2011) per cent of the NCA. Source: Natural England (2011) 1.1 Designated nature conservation sites The NCA includes the following statutory nature conservation designations: ■ Details of individual Sites of Special Scientific Interest can be searched at: Area Percentage http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/Special/sssi/search.cfm Tier Designation Name (ha) of NCA ■ Details of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) can be searched at: International Ramsar South West London Waterbodies 820 1 http://www.lnr.naturalengland.org.uk/Special/lnr/lnr_search.asp European Special Protection South West London Waterbodies 820 1 Area (SPA) SPA ■ Maps showing locations of statutory sites can be found at: Special Area of Windsor Forest & Great Park SAC; 3,148 4 http://magic.defra.gov.uk – select ‘Designations/Land-Based Conservation Richmond Park SAC; Burnham Designations/Statutory’ (SAC) Beeches SAC; Wimbledon Common SAC National National Nature Richmond Park NNR; Ruislip 1,184 1 Reserve (NNR) Woods NNR; Burnham Beeches NNR

20 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

1.1.1 Condition of designated sites 2.3 Bedrock geology Percentage of SSSI land The Thames Valley is geologically part of the London basin which is a syncline – SSSI condition category Area (ha) in category condition a concave fold with the oldest sediments at its periphery – formed 20 to 40 Ma Unfavourable declining 115 2 as a result of the Alpine Orogeny (mountain-building). The region became dry Favourable 2,427 48 land during this time. The oldest rock here is the chalk, which was laid down in Unfavourable no change 7 <1 warm shallow seas during the Cretaceous period. It is overlain by Palaeogene Unfavourable recovering 2,474 49 and Neogene sands and mudstones. Following a marine transgression some 55 Source: Natural England (March 2011) Ma, the London Clay was laid down. Overlying this are the Bagshot, Barton and ■ Details of SSSI condition can be searched at: Bracklesham Beds. These sands and clays were deposited on a large coastal http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/Special/sssi/reportIndex.cfm plain. There are very small areas of sediments of other formations. Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile, Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description

2. Landform, geology and soils 2.4 Superficial deposits Important Quaternary sediments are present, recording the changing 2.1 Elevation temperatures during this period and the presence and absences of ice sheets. The There is a difference of 125m between the lowest point of 1m and the Anglian ice sheet advanced as far south as the northern rim of the London Basin maximum height of 126 m. and forced the young River Thames to change its course to its current one. Fluvial Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile, Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description sediments deposited by the Thames river system before the Anglian Ice Age, occur predominantly along the northern edge of the London Basin, parallel with the axis 2.2 Landform and process of the syncline. Sediments deposited after the Anglian Ice Age are found along the In its northern parts, the landform reflects the rolling hills characteristic of flood plains of the current rivers. The youngest sediments are sands and gravels the nearby Chilterns. Here, the Chalk is overlain by clay and gravel, giving rise deposited by the Thames in its current location since the last ice age. to a plateau and a series of knolls. The central part of the Thames Valley is Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile, Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description dominated by the Thames flood plain, giving way to clay vales further south. There are lakes in the east resulting from mineral workings. Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile, Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description

21 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

2.5 Designated geological sites 3. Key waterbodies and catchments Tier Designation Number National Geological Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) 3 3.1 Major rivers/canals National Mixed interest SSSIs 0 The following major rivers/canals (by length) have been identified in this NCA. Local Local Geological Site 4 Name Length in NCA (km) Source: Natural England 2011 River Thames 57 Grand Union Canal 35 ■ Details of individual Sites of Special Scientific Interest can be searched at: River Colne 28 http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/Special/sssi/search.cfm Colne Brook 15 River Loddon 12 2.6 Soils and Agricultural Land Classification River Misbourne 11 Heavy clayey soils resulting from the underlying geology River Kennet 11 Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile, Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile, Countryside Character Area description, main rivers identified from OS Strategic data The main grades of agricultural land in the NCA are broken down as follows (as a proportion of total land area): Please note: other significant rivers (by volume) may also occur. These are not listed where the length within the NCA is short. Agricultural Land Classification Area (ha) Percentage of NCA Grade 1 2,919 3 Grade 2 2,334 4 The Thames Valley is drained by the River Thames and its many tributaries. Grade 3 2,8047 33 Grade 4 3,666 4 3.2 Water quality Grade 5 0 0 The total area of Nitrate Vulnerable Zone is 41, 393 ha, 48 per cent of the NCA. Non-agricultural 20,173 23 Source: Natural England (2010) Urban 28,023 33 Source: Natural England (2010) 3.3 Water Framework Directive Maps are available from the Environment Agency showing current and projected Maps showing locations of Statutory sites can be found at: future status of water bodies at: http://maps.environment-agency.gov.uk/ http://magic.defra.gov.uk – select ‘Landscape’ (shows ALC and 27 types of soils). wiyby/wiybyController?ep=maptopics&lang=_e

22 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

4. Trees and woodlands Area and proportion of ancient woodland and planted ancient woodland sites (PAWS) within the NCA: 4.1 Total woodland cover Woodland type Area (ha) Percentage of NCA The NCA contains 11,537 ha of woodland, 13 per cent of the total area, of Ancient semi-natural woodland 1,875 2 which 2,644 ha, or 3 per cent is ancient woodland Ancient re-planted woodland (PAWS) 770 <1 Source: Natural England (2010) & Forestry Commission (2011) Source: Ancient Woodland Inventory, Natural England 2007

4.2 Distribution and size of woodland and trees in the landscape Woodland within the Thames Valley is generally confined to a matrix of small farm woods. However, the north-western edge is characteristically wooded, 5. Boundary features and patterns extending up to the southern edge of the Chiltern Hills. Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile, Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description 5.1 Boundary features The estimated total length of resource is 3,614 km. In 2011 165 km of 4.3 Woodland types boundary features were under Environmental Stewardship agreements A statistical breakdown of the area and type of woodland found across the NCA including ditches (9km), hedgerows (124km) and woodland (31km). Mature is detailed below. oaks are a characteristic feature of hedgerows in the NCA. Source: Countryside Quality Counts Draft Historic Profile, Countryside Character Area Area and proportion of different woodland types in the NCA (over 2 ha). Woodland type Area (ha) Percentage of NCA 5.2 Field patterns Broadleaved 9,899 12 Regular field patterns on the flood plain suggest late enclosure, while smaller Coniferous 982 1 field patterns on the higher ground suggests earlier enclosure of drier land. Mixed 395 <1 Source: Countryside Quality Counts Draft Historic Profile, Countryside Character Area Other 261 <1 Source: Forestry Commission (2011)

23 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

6. Agriculture 6.4 Land use From 2000 to 2009, the area of land used for cereal cultivation decreased from The following data has been taken from the Agricultural Census linked to this NCA. 4,702 to 4,064 ha. Oilseeds cultivation decreased from 951 to 854 ha. Overall, the area given over to arable crops increased from 805 to 889 ha. 6.1 Farm type Source: Agricultural Census, DEFRA (2010) The number of commercial holdings dropped from 411 in 2000 to 339 in 2009. The number of livestock farms fell from 138 to 90 (-35 per cent) during 6.5 Livestock numbers this time and the number of mixed farms fell from 30 to 14 (-53 per cent). The In 2009 there were 7,000 cattle, down from 10,000 in 2000; 11,000 sheep, number of arable and horticultural holdings decreased by 17 per cent, from down from 19,000 in 2000; and 6,000 pigs, down from 14,000 in 2000. 100 to 83. Source: Agricultural Census, DEFRA (2010) Source: Agricultural Census, DEFRA (2010) 6.6 Farm labour 6.2 Farm size The number of principal farmers within the NCA fell from 484 in 2000 to 359 From 2000 to 2009 there was a change in the size profile of farm holdings in 2009, and there were 10 fewer salaried managers; 64 down from 74. The across the NCA from small and large to more medium sized holdings. The number of full time workers fell from 252 to 173 in the same period, as did number of holdings < 5 ha decreased from 64 (totalling 119 ha) to 42 (56 ha); casual/gang workers, from 202 to 146. The number of part time workers rose holdings of 5 – 20 ha decreased by 30 per cent from 161 (1720 ha) to 113 (1,298 from 106 to 121. ha); holdings of 20 – 50 ha increased by 14 per cent from 86 (2,690 ha) to 88 Source: Agricultural Census, DEFRA (2010) (2,867 ha); holdings of 50 – 100 ha increased by 2 per cent from 56 (3,916 ha) to 57 holdings (4,012 ha); holdings > 100 ha in size decreased from 44 (10,547) to Please note: (i) Some of the Census data are estimated by Defra so may not present a 39 (9,784 ha). precise assessment of agriculture within this area (ii) Data refers to commercial holdings Source: Agricultural Census, DEFRA (2010) only (iii) Data includes land outside of the NCA where it belongs to holdings whose centre point is recorded as being within the NCA. 6.3 Farm ownership In 2009 the total area of farmland was 18,027 ha of which owned land accounted for 10,796 ha. In 2000 the total area of farms was 18,992 ha, with 12,266 ha owned land. Source: Agricultural Census, DEFRA (2010)

24 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

7. Key habitats and species removed. Biodiversity Action Plans remain a useful source of guidance and information. More information about Biodiversity 2020 can be found 7.1 Habitat distribution/coverage at; www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/conservation/biodiversity/ A range of BAP habitats exists at several discrete locations, for example protectandmanage/englandsbiodiversitystrategy2011.aspx Burnham Beeches. There are areas of wet woodland throughout the NCA, and an expanse of mixed deciduous lowland woodland at Windsor Forest. The NCA contains the following areas of mapped priority habitats (as mapped Source: London Basin Natural Area Profile by National Inventories). Footnotes denote local/expert interpretation. This will be used to inform future national inventory updates. 7.2 Priority habitats Priority habitat Area (ha) Percentage of NCA The Government’s new strategy for biodiversity in England, Biodiversity 2020, Broadleaved mixed & yew woodland (Broad habitat) 5,460 6 replaces the previous Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) led approach. Priority Lowland meadows 294 <1 habitats and species are identified in Biodiversity 2020, but references to Fens 20 <1 BAP priority habitats and species, and previous national targets have been Lowland dry acid grassland 1,133 1 Purple moor grass 5 <1 Reedbed 531 1 Coastal flood plain & grazing marsh 236 <1 Lowland heathland 68 <1 Lowland calcareous grassland 17 <1 Mudflats 1 <1 Source: Natural England (2011)

■ Maps showing locations of priority habitats are available at: http://magic.defra.gov.uk – select ‘Habitats and Species/Habitats’

7.3 Key species and assemblages of species ■ Maps showing locations of some key species are available at: Burnham Beeches. http://magic.defra.gov.uk – select ‘Habitats and Species/Habitats’ ■ Maps showing locations of S41 species are available at: http://data.nbn.org.uk/

25 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

8. Settlement and development patterns 9. Key historic sites and features

8.1 Settlement pattern 9.1 Origin of historic features About 45 per cent of land is within greenbelt. The area has a high rate of change to Royal estates and palaces include Hampton Court; large houses set within urban with expansion of urban into peri-urban evident at Slough, Rickmansworth, 18th or early 19th century ornamental parkland, concentrated to the north of Bracknell, Reading and Wokingham. In the more rural parts there is also evidence Bracknell; and Eton College. of continued development on previously undeveloped land. Source: Countryside Quality Counts Draft Historic Profile, Source: Office for National Statistics census data 2001 Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description

8.2 Main settlements 9.2 Designated historic assets Main settlements include Slough, Rickmansworth, Bracknell, Reading and This NCA has the following historic designations: Wokingham. The total estimated population for this NCA (derived from ONS ■ 58 Registered Parks and Gardens covering 6,950 ha 2001 census data) is: 1,420,439. ■ 2 World Heritage Sites Source: Office for National Statistics census data 2001 ■ 79 Scheduled Monuments ■ 5,009 Listed Buildings 8.3 Local vernacular and building materials Source: Natural England (2010) Large houses set within 18th or early 19th century ornamental parkland, concentrated to the north of Bracknell, provide a stark contrast with sporadic ■ More information is available at the following address: modern development. There are very few villages remaining of traditional www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/heritage-at-risk/ character. ■ www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/protection/process/national- Source: Country Quality Counts Draft Historic Profile, heritage-list-for-england/ Thames Valley Countryside Character Area description

26 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

10. Recreation and access

10.1 Public access ■ 7 per cent of the NCA (5,805 ha) is classified as being publicly accessible. ■ There are 1,027 km of public rights of way at a density of 1.2 km per km2. The Thames Path National Trail accounts for 89 km of this. Sources: Natural England (2010)

The following table shows the breakdown of land which is publically accessible in perpetuity: Access designation Area (ha) Percentage of NCA National Trust (Accessible all year) 363 <1 Common Land 1,133 1 Country Parks 521 1 CROW Access Land (Section 4 and 16) 1,318 2 CROW Section 15 1,953 2 Village Greens 62 <1 Doorstep Greens 0 0 Forestry Commission Walkers Welcome Grants 1,830 2 Local Nature Reserves (LNR) 853 1 Millennium Greens <1 <1 Accessible National Nature Reserves (NNR) 1,335 2 Agri-environment Scheme Access 0 0 Woods for People 3,330 4 Sources: Natural England compiled data 2011/Woodland Trust/National Trust/Forestry Commission

Horace Walpole’s “Gothick” mansion, Strawberry Hill. Please note: Common Land refers to land included in the 1965 commons register; CROW = Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000; OC and RCL = Open Country and Registered Common Land.

27 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Notable trends from the 1960s to 2007 are a steady growth in urban areas. 11. Experiential qualities ■ More information is available at the following address: 11.1 Tranquillity www.cpre.org.uk/resources/countryside/tranquil-places Based on the CPRE map of Tranquillity (2006) none of this NCA can be officially considered as tranquil. The lowest scores for tranquillity are around the urban areas and Heathrow Airport. Expanses of parkland such as Windsor Great Park score medium tranquillity.

A breakdown of tranquillity values for this NCA are detailed in the table below: Tranquillity Score Highest value within NCA <1 Lowest value within NCA -131 Mean value within NCA -59 Sources: CPRE (2006) ■ More information is available at the following address: www.cpre.org.uk/resources/countryside/tranquil-places

11.2 Intrusion The 2007 Intrusion Map (CPRE) shows the extent to which rural landscapes are ‘intruded on’ from urban development, noise (primarily traffic noise), and other sources of visual and auditory intrusion. This shows that almost the entire NCA is disturbed by visual and auditory intrusion. A breakdown of intrusion values for this NCA are detailed in the table below. Intrusion category 1960s (%) 1990s (%) 2007 (%) Percentage change (1960s-2007) Disturbed 63 75 57 -6 Undisturbed 14 1 <1 -14 Urban 23 23 43 20 Windsor Castle. Sources: CPRE (2007)

28 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

12. Data sources ■ Registered Battlefields, English Heritage (2005) ■ British Geological Survey (2006) ■ Record of Scheduled Monuments, English Heritage (2006) ■ Natural Area Profiles, Natural England (published by English Nature 1993-1998 ) ■ Registered Parks and Gardens, English Heritage (2006) ■ Countryside Character Descriptions, Natural England (regional volumes ■ World Heritage Sites, English Heritage (2006) published by Countryside Commission/Countryside Agency 1998/1999) ■ Incorporates Historic Landscape Characterisation and work for preliminary ■ Joint Character Area GIS boundaries, Natural England (data created 2001) Historic Farmstead Character Statements (English Heritage/Countryside ■ National Parks and AONBs GIS boundaries, Natural England (2006) Agency 2006) ■ Heritage Coast Boundaries, Natural England (2006) Please note all figures contained within the report have been rounded to the nearest ■ Agricultural Census June Survey, Defra (2000,2009) unit. For this reason proportion figures will not (in all) cases add up to 100%. ■ National Forest Inventory, Forestry Commission (2011) The convention <1 has been used to denote values less than a whole unit. ■ Countryside Quality Counts Draft Historic Profiles, English Heritage (2004)* ■ Ancient Woodland Inventory, Natural England (2003) ■ BAP Priority Habitats GIS data, Natural England (March 2011) ■ Special Areas of Conservation data, Natural England (data accessed in March 2011) ■ Special Protection Areas data, Natural England (data accessed in March 2011) ■ Ramsar sites data, Natural England (data accessed in March 2011) ■ Sites of Special Scientific Interest, Natural England (data accessed in March 2011) ■ Detailed River Network, Environment Agency (2008) ■ Source protection zones, Environment Agency (2005) ■ Registered Common Land GIS data, Natural England (2004) ■ Open Country GIS data, Natural England (2004) ■ Public Rights of Way Density, Defra (2011) ■ National Trails, Natural England (2006) ■ National Tranquillity Mapping data, CPRE (2007) ■ Intrusion map data, CPRE (2007)

29 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Supporting document 2: Landscape change

Recent changes and trends Agriculture ■■ Farming is generally limited in this area because of the urban character, Trees and woodlands expansion of settlements, demand for reservoirs, gravel pits and ■■ Over the last 10 years, following uptake of the Woodland Grant Scheme, recreation facilities such as golf courses. woodland in the area has been enhanced, and in some places increased. Broadleaf woodland SSSI are predominantly in favourable condition, ■■ Countryside Stewardship uptake for annual area features followed the suggesting the wooded character is strengthening. The area is also of national average since 1999. The most extensive annual Countryside international importance for its parklands, which include Windsor Great Stewardship agreements in 2003 were for lowland hay meadows (249 Park and Richmond Park Special Areas for Conservation (SAC) and has a ha), regeneration of grassland/semi-natural vegetation (239 ha) and high priority for the restoration of coppice management. lowland pastures on neutral/acid soils (187 ha). The extent of Countryside Stewardship agreements is important but limited. Agricultural character ■■ The potential for the creation of new woodlands is identified as being low. has been weakened and continues to erode slowly.

■■ Agriculture has largely been expelled from the area within the M25 other Boundary features than for some remnants. Elsewhere there is a mixture of arable and ■■ Field boundaries in the area are predominantly hedgerows. The pasture. The cultivated parts of the Thames floodplain are dominated by introduction of Environmental Stewardship (ES) in 2005 has led to an grazing land with arable increasing to the west. increase in the length of boundary features managed under schemes. As of March 2011, 124 km of hedgerow was managed under ES. ■■ Between 2000 and 2009, the total area devoted to farming dropped by 5 per cent. The number of livestock fell, with pigs showing the sharpest drop ■■ The estimated total length of boundary features is about 3,614 km in this of 60 per cent. Cattle and sheep numbers fell by 32 per cent and 42 per cent NCA. As the total length of these in agricultural environment agreements is respectively but the area of land classed as uncropped or grazing fell by only very low at barely 165 km, the resource has probably been neglected. 4 per cent. In many areas this grazing is now exclusively for horses. During this period, all land used for crop growing also reduced apart from small increases in that used for hardy nursery stock and “other” arable crops.

30 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Settlement and development makes it highly significant. Much is being restored and extended under ■■ Towards London, the natural character of the area is overtaken by High Level Stewardship agreements. urban influences; a dense network of roads including the M25 corridor, Heathrow Airport, railway lines, golf courses, pylon lines, reservoirs and extensive mineral workings. Villages are now engulfed by development. Historic features ■■ The Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew were designated a UNESCO World ■■ The fringe zone to Greater London has seen rapid and often haphazard Heritage Site in 2003, covering not just the gardens themselves but a development giving the overall impression of a lack of co-ordination. surrounding buffer zone of nearly 300 ha.

■■ Further west, towns expanded continually since the late 19th century. The ■■ There are limited Countryside Stewardship agreements for management area has a high rate of change to urban, particularly evident at Slough, of historic landscapes. The character of the resource probably remains Rickmansworth, Bracknell, Reading and Wokingham. Development weakened. About 67 per cent of parkland is covered by Historic Parkland pressure continues to transform the natural character. Grants and about 9 per cent in agri-environmental schemes.

■■ There is a medium-high concentration of pre-1750 farmstead buildings, Semi-natural habitat typically of loose courtyard plan with timber-framed barns (including aisled ■■ Many designated Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) are broadleaved barns) and cattle housing (often a later addition). There are many mainly 19th woodlands, which are generally in favourable condition. Acid grasslands century farmsteads built in brick with Welsh slate or tile or pantile roofs, often are also frequent but their condition is mostly unfavourable (no arranged in regular courtyard complexes. About 55 per cent of historic farm change). Uptake of Countryside Stewardship for semi-natural grassland buildings remain unconverted. About 83 per cent are intact structurally. management is limited given size of the area.

■■ Recent conservation efforts have began to reverse the decline in natural Coast and rivers reedbeds. New reedbeds have been planted at Hampton, Marble Hill, Richmond and Molesey and nearby the Wildlife and Wetland Centre at ■■ The presence of water is a key feature - in the form of rivers, streams, lakes, Barnes is now classified as a SSSI. canals and open water bodies (the result of restored gravel workings).

■■ Although the area of lowland heathland is relatively small at around 70 ■■ The NCA is under extreme pressure for water, being the main supplier for ha, most is SSSI and its proximity to the adjacent Thames Basin Heaths SPA London. Further large-scale development is planned for this area. Almost all

31 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

rivers are heavily modified and suffer from pollution and low flows. There are Drivers of change concerns that low flows (in times of low rainfall and high demand for water) might be impacting on ecology, including the passage of migratory fish. Climate change ■■ The Thames Barrier protects London and the Thames Valley from flooding ■■ Invasive non-native species are an increasing problem. Japanese caused by tidal surges. However, the Environment Agency predicts that this knotweed has doubled its distribution in the last 20 years and non-native is unsustainable in the future. Milder, wetter winters may result in increases crayfish are increasing their range (Grand Union Canal being a hotspot for of peak river flows of 20 per cent. recent sightings). Freshwater shrimp species has recently been found in the Thames around Windsor and Eton. ■■ More frequent, short duration, intense storms in summer are likely to cause more widespread and regular “flash” flooding from overwhelmed drainage ■■ The population of Chinese mitten crabs in the Thames catchment has systems and some rivers. It is estimated for example, that fluvial flows entering increased dramatically since the 1980s6. This population continues to expand the tidal river at Teddington will increase by up to 40 per cent by 2080. westwards and reach Boveney Lock, just upstream of Windsor in 2007. ■■ The Environment Agency estimates that where properties have 1 per cent ■■ The Jubilee River was constructed by the Environment Agency in the early risk of flooding from rivers in the Thames catchment area, this may increase 2000s to take overflow from the River Thames and alleviate flooding to by approximately 20 per cent as a result of climate change. In areas with areas in the Maidenhead, Windsor, and Eton areas. A footpath combined wide, flat floodplains such as Thames Valley itself, this may be higher. with National Cycle Route 61 runs along virtually its entire length. ■■ The area’s woodlands, particularly its highly characteristic and ecologically important veteran trees may be affected by increased storminess, periods Minerals of drought and the prevalence of pests and diseases, with the loss of shallow-rooting beech and previously-pollarded ancient trees to wind- ■■ Extraction of gravel has shaped the landscape and remains an important throw and drought-stress. industry in the NCA. Reclamation of disused mineral extraction sites has resulted in large expanses of lake and wetland which provide important ■■ Drier summers and increasing temperatures could lead to deterioration in habitats for wildlife and are also valuable recreational resources. the area’s semi-natural wetland habitats, including ancient wet meadows and could also lead to lower river flows and increased demand for water resources.

6 www.nhm.ac.uk/resources-rx/files/mitten-crab-environment-agency-report-58345.pdf

32 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Other key drivers ■■ Development pressures include major roads, lighting and signage, expansion ■■ The Thames Rivers Restoration Trust Action Plan (2009) aims to find areas of urban areas and airport development, much unrelated to the surrounding where floodwater can be safely stored, restore natural shape and function area and contributing to the overall fragmentation of the landscape. and form corridors between SSSI and reserves for wildlife to move around.

■■ Incipient pressure from non-farming use of small-sized holdings, ■■ Development may provide opportunities for co-ordinated provision of notably horse grazing and land held for ‘hope value’. Also pressure from quality green infrastructure. This will have benefits for the health and well- recreational uses, particularly golf course development, often at the being of those living in the NCA as well as visitors. expense of commons and heathland. ■■ There is likely to be continued demand for recreation opportunities from ■■ Designed parkland features at risk from changing agricultural activities, those living in the more urban parts of the NCA and Inner London. development pressure and lack of management for individual trees.

■■ Fly-tipping, casual illegal use such as motorbike scrambling and incursion by travellers are common.

■■ Recent growth in popularity of “green” and woodland burials and interest in woodfuel may present opportunities for creation of new woodland.

■■ The Environment Agency and Thames Water plan to address the key pressures in the catchment, and those waters in poor condition will be prioritised.

■■ Measures to ease the passage of fish will increase their population in the freshwater Thames upstream.

33 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Supporting document 3: Analysis supporting Statements of Environmental Opportunity

The following analysis section focuses on a selection of the key provisioning, Biodiversity and geodiversity are crucial in supporting the full range of ecosystem regulating and cultural ecosystem goods and services for this NCA. These services provided by this landscape. Wildlife and geologically-rich landscapes are are underpinned by supporting services such as photosynthesis, nutrient also of cultural value and are included in this section of the analysis. This analysis cycling, soil formation and evapo-transpiration. Supporting services perform shows the projected impact of Statements of Environmental Opportunity on the an essential role in ensuring the availability of all ecosystem services. value of nominated ecosystem services within this landscape.

The Thames Path at Richmond.

34 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Ecosystem Service

Statement of Environmental Opportunity Food Food provision Timber provision Biomass energy Water availability Genetic diversity Regulating climate change Regulating soil erosion Regulating soil quality Regulating water quality Regulating water flow Pollination Pest regulation Regulating coastal erosion Sense place of / Inspiration Sense of history Tranquillity Recreation Biodiversity Geodiversity SEO 1: Plan for the enhancement of the area’s rivers, and the expansion of their operational flood plains and associated wetland habitats, aiding the regulation N/A of water flow, improving water quality, benefiting biodiversity, and reinforcing ** * ** *** * ** ** ** *** *** * * *** ** *** *** *** * cultural heritage and landscape. SEO 2: Plan for the landscape-scale enhancement of the area’s extensive gravel workings and other open waterbodies (including reservoirs) forming part of the South-West London Waterbodies Special Protection Area, for their contribution N/A * * * ** ** * * ** * to water supply and storage, for their important habitats and recreation * *** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** facilities, and for their geological interest. SEO 3: Maintain existing greenspace and plan for the creation of green infrastructure associated with the significant projected growth of urban areas, to reduce the impact of development, to help reduce flooding issues, and to strengthen access and recreation opportunities. Seek links from urban areas to N/A ** *** ** ** ** ** * * wider recreation assets such as the Thames Path National Trail, National Cycle ** ** ** *** ** *** *** ** *** ** Routes, and the river and canal network, and promote the incorporation of best practice environmental measures into any new development. SEO 4: Protect and manage the area’s historic parklands, wood pastures, ancient woodland, commons, orchards and distinctive ancient pollards, and restore and increase woodland for carbon sequestration, noise and pollution reduction, N/A ** * * woodfuel and protection from soil erosion, while also enhancing biodiversity, ** ** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** sense of place and history. SEO 5: Develop the recreational, educational and commercial tourism opportunities offered by public access to – and engagement with – the historic buildings and landscapes in the area, such as Hampton Court Palace, Windsor N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** * Castle and the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, for their contribution to a sense of * *** *** *** * * place and to people’s enjoyment and understanding of the area.

Note: Arrows shown in the table above indicate anticipated impact on service delivery: = Increase = Slight Increase = No change = Slight Decrease = Decrease. Asterisks denote confidence in projection (*low **medium***high) ° symbol denotes where insufficient information on the likely impact is available. National Importance; Regional Importance; Local Importance

35 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Landscape attributes

Landscape attribute Justification for selection Rivers, streams, lakes, ■■ South West London Waterbodies is a Ramsar site and Special Protection Area (SPA) providing breeding and overwintering habitat for wildfowl. canals and open water ■■ The area supplies most of London’s fresh water needs. bodies (the result of restored gravel workings) ■■ Woodland and scrub near water is important habitat for songbirds, notably nightingale. are a key feature. ■■ Rivers and waterbodies provide areas of high biodiversity, recreation and relative tranquillity in an essentially urban landscape. ■■ None of the 14 river bodies or 12 lakes in the Thames catchment currently achieves good or better ecological status/potential. 45 per cent of rivers assessed for biology are at good or high biological status now, with 41 per cent at poor and none bad. ■■ Because of its importance for water supply and flood management, the area will be subject to numerous water quality and flood management improvements during the coming years. ■■ The River Thames is now relatively clean compared to many other metropolitan estuaries around the world. It supports over 120 different species of fish including eel, carp, perch and sea lamprey. However, the concentration of urbanisation and large local population means that pollution remains a problem. It is also host to some invasive plants, including Japanese knotweed as well as signal crayfish and Chinese mitten crab. ■■ A good quality water environment has the potential to help economic regeneration, to enhance the economic and social amenity value of developments, and improve the quality of life. ■■ The need to work with farmers, landowners and interest groups beyond the boundary of the NCA to promote the use of soil and nutrient management plans and raise awareness of Codes of Good Agricultural Practice and Best Farming Practice to protect and improve water quality. The wealth of the area over ■■ 58 Registered Parks and Gardens covering 6,950 ha. the centuries has resulted ■■ Windsor Great Park and Richmond Park are SAC. in creation of many formally designed landscapes. ■■ The area has been renowned for its views since at least the 17th century, is important in the history of landscape and provides continued inspiration for artists and writers. ■■ There are limited Countryside Stewardship agreements for management of historic landscapes. The character of this resource probably remains weakened. In 1918 about 12 per cent of the NCA was historic parkland. By 1995 an estimated 30 per cent had been lost. About 67 per cent of the remaining parkland is covered by a Historic Parkland Grant, and about 9 per cent is included within an agri-environmental scheme. ■■ The double line moth, normally associated with the South West and declining, has been found in the area around Richmond Park and Wimbledon Common. It is listed as priority species in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan.

36 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Landscape attribute Justification for selection The natural character of the ■■ Pressures of development also present opportunities for inclusion of greenspace and creation of woodland around transport corridors area is dominated by urban to reduce pollution and noise. influences; a dense network ■■ There are possibilities offered by mitigation measures and conversion of extracted gravel and landfill sites, for example one of the of roads including the M4 largest landfill sites in the country, outside Gerrard’s Cross, will reach capacity in the next few years. and M25 corridors, London suburbs and other large ■■ Development pressures owing to proximity to London in particular, include both existing and proposed major road corridors including towns including Reading and lighting and signage, expansion of urban areas, and airport development/associated activities. Much of this development is unrelated to Slough, Heathrow Airport, the character of the surrounding area and has significantly contributed to the overall fragmentation of the landscape. railway lines, golf courses, ■■ Development may provide opportunities for co-ordinated provision of quality green infrastructure. This will have benefits for the health pylon lines, reservoirs, and well-being of those living in the NCA and visitors. extensive mineral extraction and numerous flooded ■■ There is likely to be continued demand for recreation opportunities from those living in the more urban parts of the NCA and Inner London. gravel pits. ■■ In the vicinity of Slough and Windsor, land ownership by Eton College and the Crown Estate has restricted the spread of development. ■■ Parkland, commons and greens are an important feature, providing areas of recreation and relative tranquillity in an essentially urban landscape. Woodlands characterise ■■ There are opportunities to restore and increase woodland to reduce soil erosion, noise and air pollution and enhance recreation and the north-western area, biodiversity. the wooded character ■■ Burnham Beeches is a SAC. extending up to the southern edge of the ■■ Veteran trees need improved management to combat the effects of climate change. Chiltern Hills. ■■ Restoration of woodland on slopes, for example on the edge of the Chilterns, can help ease soil erosion. Despite the general urban ■■ The England Woodfuel Strategy sets a target of bringing 2,000,000 m3 of wood from England’s currently undermanaged woods to feel, pockets of ancient woodfuel market by 2020. Targeted grants such as the Woodfuel Woodland Improvement Grant help address barriers to long term woodland survive and woodland management supported by the market. veteran trees survive in parkland, fields and ■■ Slough Heat and Power has been using a mixture of woody biomass (up to 300,000 m3 per year) for nearly 10 years sourced from waste, hedgerows. arboriculture and habitat restoration. A proportion is sourced from existing woods. ■■ British Airport Authority woodfuelled CHP system at Heathrow Terminal 2 will use woodfuel supplied from sustainably managed local woods via LC Energy’s Bedfont woodfuel hub supplying 25,000 m3 to T2.

37 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Landscape attribute Justification for selection Relative little but highly ■■ Wimbledon Common is a SAC and is managed under a stewardship agreement to improve this habitat which is rare within the NCA. valuable heathland. ■■ Although there is less than 70 ha of heathland in Thames Valley, this forms an important link between adjacent NCAs with much larger patches, notably Thames Basin Heaths and Northern Thames Basin. ■■ A small part of the Thames Basin Heaths Buffer Zone falls within the NCA south of Windsor. ■■ There is a relatively low proportion of carbon stored in the top soil horizon, although there are small areas under remnant heathland with higher carbon content. ■■ Some of the loamy and clayey floodplain soils with naturally high groundwater (7 per cent) are peaty at depth or include small areas of peaty soils, while the naturally wet very acid sandy and loamy soils (2 per cent) are mostly organic topsoils which are a store of carbon. The remaining soil types are mineral soils. Farming is generally ■■ Agricultural character has been weakened and continues to erode and farming has largely been expelled from the area within the M25 limited due to demands apart from some remnants. for reservoirs, gravel pits, ■■ Thames Valley was once a major fruit-growing area, supplying the London markets. Varieties developed in the region include the Cox’s recreation and development. Orange Pippin. Some orchards survive representing a resource for biodiversity and cultural and genetic heritage potential. Agricultural land is fragmented and poor overall ■■ There are a number of local initiatives to support rural business and viability of farming in the area, notably in the Colne Valley. and the cultivated parts of ■■ There has been a significant increase in land turned to horses as other livestock numbers have declined over the last 15 years. the Thames floodplain are dominated by grazing with arable increasing to the west. An area steeped in ■■ There is evidence of continuous occupation since at least the Neolithic period and the area is known for its rich archaeological remains history with important from all periods. heritage assets, many of ■■ The proximity to and location downstream of London attracted nobility and royalty increasingly as London grew in importance from the international significance. medieval period. The result is, buildings renowned and recognised throughout the world including Windsor Castle and Hampton Court Palace. ■■ There are 79 Scheduled Ancient Monuments and over 5,000 listed buildings. ■■ The area includes the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2003. As well as being an internationally important centre for study of plant science since the 18th century, it is also the home of over 40 listed buildings, including Decimus Burton’s Victorian Glasshouses and the 18th century pagoda. ■■ The area is linked with key historical events such as the sealing of Magna Carta at Runnymede.

38 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Landscape opportunities

■■ The restoration of natural river geomorphology and the continuity with ■■ Work to eradicate invasive non-native species such as Japanese knotweed floodplains and allowing seasonal inundation where this can bring positive and invasive crustaceans and work to prevent spread to new areas. benefits for biodiversity and flood alleviation. Recreating backwaters as a Improve awareness of the importance of biosecurity through campaigns refuge for aquatic species in times of drought, thus reflecting the policies of such as, “Check, Clean, Dry”. the Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan, as well as being essential to sustaining wetland habitats. Restored rivers can be used as corridors ■■ Support initiatives to restore historic features, encourage awareness and linking sites in a generally fragmented landscape. Support measures to ease facilitate access to develop recreational, educational and commercial fish passage such as elver ladders to increase populations. tourism opportunities as a means of protecting heritage assets, including historic houses, scheduled ancient monuments and traditional black ■■ Significant creation of new wetlands that form part of sustainable urban timber-framed farm buildings in the western clay vale. drainage systems, particularly within and surrounding Reading, linking with wider wetland habitats within floodplains to aid flood management, ■■ Protect surviving geological heritage of the area by conserving important create a robust wildlife habitat that benefits biodiversity and landscape geological exposures. and helps to regulate water quality. ■■ Protect and sustainably manage existing broadleaved and especially ancient ■■ Creation of multi-functional natural greenspace surrounding new development woodlands, particularly those characteristic of the north-western plateau (including allotments and broadleaved woodland), linking into the heart of and on steeper slopes within river catchments. Expand the amount of this urban areas as part of comprehensive green infrastructure planning including habitat by using opportunities provided by new development, the need the creation of attractive new wetlands that form part of Sustainable urban to shield transport corridors for noise and light pollution and increased drainage systems, particularly within and surrounding Reading. Ensure that interest in commercial woodfuel and green burial industries. this development does not intrude into the wider landscape, particularly the historic, inspirational views, or damage heritage assets. ■■ Restore and re-link areas of lowland heathland on higher sandy ground in the north, especially within the South Bucks Heaths and Parklands Area, to ■■ Protection, expansion and sustainable management of wetland habitats restore the extent and condition of this important resource. including wet woodlands, riverside willows and belts of poplar along the Thames floodplain, lowland meadows, fens and reedbeds.

39 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

■■ Restore, expand and re-link lowland dry acid grassland and (dry) lowland meadows and connect with wide grassland buffer strips running across slopes and adjacent to watercourses to help impede cross-land flows and further improve water quality whilst creating a robust and well-connected habitat network and enhancing adaptation to climate change.

■■ Protect, restore and sustainably manage historic parkland and wood pasture landscapes including those of international importance (e.g. Windsor Great Park SAC and Burnham Beeches SAC, a wood pasture landscape forming part of the South Bucks Heaths and Parklands) and less well known parkland/wood-pasture sites such as Haines Hill Park, accommodating high visitor numbers whilst protecting historic character and enhancing biodiversity

■■ Restoration and sustainable management of traditional orchards where economically viable, using local fruit tree varieties such as Cox’s Orange Pippin first grown at Colnbrook in 1825, Feltham Pippin and Langley Pippin.

■■ Support measures to encourage farming, particularly those which foster engagement between local communities and rural businesses as a way of checking the decline of local food production in the area and preserving the landscape.

■■ Spatial planning and design for urban development and infrastructure should aim to reduce surface water runoff; promote incorporation of water conservation measures; protect and restore habitats; improve the quality of rivers and groundwater and so protect drinking water supplies.

40 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Ecosystem service analysis Please note that the following analysis is based upon available data and current understanding of ecosystem services. It does not represent a comprehensive local The following section shows the analysis used to determine key Ecosystem assessment. Quality and quantity of data for each service is variable locally and Service opportunities within the area. These opportunities have been many of the services listed are not yet fully researched or understood. Therefore combined with the analysis of landscape opportunities to create Statements analysis and opportunities may change upon publication of further evidence and of Environmental Opportunity. better understanding of the inter-relationship between services at a local level.

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Food Mixed Predominantly low grade agricultural Regional Agriculture is generally in decline and virtually Growing interest in locally-grown Food provision agriculture land supporting a mixture of arable and expelled from the area within the M25, due produce presents opportunities for provision grazing regimes, the latter producing to pressures of development and recreation. farmers to explore new outlets. Available water Biodiversity sheep and some dairy and beef cattle. The value of land makes maintaining existing Derelict orchards can be restored for the Fertility of soils levels of agricultural activity a challenge. Regulating Many historic orchards now derelict and benefit of biodiversity, genetic diversity, water quality Rivers and redundant. Livestock numbers have fallen sharply and landscape and for growing heritage gravel beds much grazing land is now turned to horses varieties for select markets such as the Sense of Fruits and vegetables are grown on the resulting in a reduction of 38 per cent in other Colne Valley Food initiative. history gravel terraces, and the area is a historic livestock numbers between 2000 and 2009. supplier to London. Support the many measures that are In contrast to other land uses, the growing of Genetic underway to restore rivers and improve diversity The Thames not only supplies fish for hardy nursery stock has increased by 23 per water quality, including measures to local consumption but is also vital for cent. improve fish passage to increase fish sea-fish stocks. The Thames traditionally provided fish, stocks. notable eels, though the number of most species fell to a level which could only support local markets. The gravel beds of the upper tideway are an important nursery ground for several species of North Sea fish notably flounder.

41 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Timber Woodland Woodland is predominantly broadleaved Local Measures to increase plantation for timber Opportunities for increased timber Timber provision (12 per cent of the NCA), with needs to be balanced against loss of habitat, production are limited, though there may provision approximately 1,000 ha of coniferous productive agricultural land and landscape be scope for some new plantations. Biodiversity woodland (1 per cent of the NCA). character. The potential may therefore be The growing popularity of woodfuel in limited. Sense of place Woodland is mainly concentrated to the the area means that this is more likely to north of the area or as strands of wet Timber from broadleaf woodland may be be the focus for woodland management Regulating woodland along the Thames. under-utilised. Reinstatement of traditional in the near future and a return to more water flow woodland management may release small traditional management techniques Windsor Forest represents a large volumes of hardwoods. Regulating surviving segment of the once more soil quality heavily wooded southern clay plains. The areas of long-standing ancient semi- natural woodland within the area are Regulating important for biodiversity, carbon storage and soil erosion soil quality and structure. Deadwood provides important habitat, particularly for invertebrates and fungi which are important in this area. Water Reservoirs Most of the area’s water supply comes National Most of London’s fresh water is supplied from Measures to find additional storage for Water availability from the Thames. the Thames Valley. The area is already under flood waters within the Thames Valley availability Rivers pressure for water and this is likely to worsen may present opportunities for increasing Overall, the area is under considerable Regulating Chilterns chalk with effects of climate change and predicted water provision, by for example restoring pressure for water supply with only the water flow aquifer increased demand. and extending floodplains. Considerable River Lodden classed as having water investment in measures to improve rivers Recreation available for abstraction. Population is likely to increase with significant and enhance exhausted gravel workings new development planned for the area and Biodiversity to provide additional water storage to recent years have already seen drought meet increasing demand and counteract measures introduced. Sense of place effects of climate change. Many of these will also produce opportunities for biodiversity and recreation. There is a need to promote water conservation measures in new developments to support existing water resources and help manage demand.

42 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Genetic Royal Botanic Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew World National The area was once a major fruit supplier of the Preservation and restoration of surviving Genetic diversity Gardens at Kew Heritage Site falls within the NCA. London markets and many historic varieties orchards provide opportunities for diversity of fruit, particularly apples and including the revival of historic varieties of fruit for Orchards There are many derelict historic orchards Timber Cox’s Orange Pippin, were developed in this genetic diversity and local markets. containing some local varieties. provision Parkland area. Preservation of ancient trees in There is much historic parkland, ancient Biodiversity Heathland Historic parkland has been preserved as historic parklands and ancient woodland and some heathland. “islands” within an essentially urban context woodland provides a primary source of Food so certain preserved species may offer arboricultural genetic material. provision genetic resources. For example the oldest The Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew aim living vine at Hampton Court, numerous rare to deliver science-based conservation, species in Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew and using plant-based solutions to address descendants of Henry VIII’s original herd of global issues such as climate change. fallow deer. Kew houses the world’s largest and most diverse botanical collections. Biomass Broadleaf The existing woodland cover (13 per cent Regional Much existing woodland is under-managed Current local initiatives within the Biomass energy woodland of the NCA) offers potential for timber as or unmanaged. There are numerous initiatives NCA offer opportunities to create and energy biomass. being explored locally within the NCA to extend existing woodlands and improve Short rotation Biodiversity increase potential for biomass, particularly management to produce timber as a coppice woodfuel. local source of biomass. Recreation The potential yield for miscanthus is Opportunities for the creation of short Sense of place predominantly high throughout, excluding rotation coppice in wetter, less fertile the Maidenhead area, while that for short areas where it compliments existing Timber rotation coppice is predominantly medium. biodiversity assets and helps regulate provision water flow and quality, but does not http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/growing/ Regulating damage buried archaeological features water quality crops/industrial/energy/opportunities/index.htm or obscure heritage assets. Climate regulation Regulating soil erosion

43 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Climate Heathland Some of the loamy and Local Mineral soils can be low in organic matter, Flood management plans can result in restoration Climate regulation clayey floodplain soils with sometimes where under continuous arable of large amounts of floodplain, creating and regulation Wet and naturally high groundwater cultivation. extending wet woodland, water meadow and ancient Regulating (7 per cent) are peaty at semi-natural Wetlands and areas of permanent pasture and fens. water flow depth or include small woodland woodland contribute to climate regulation areas of peaty soils, while Carbon sequestration can be increased by Biodiversity through storage of carbon dioxide and increased Fens the naturally wet very acid increasing organic matter inputs and by reducing levels of organic matter in soils. Recent sandy and loamy soils (2 the frequency / area of cultivation. Regulating conservation efforts have begun to reverse the Water per cent) are mostly organic water quality meadows decline in the area of reed beds. The restoration of the area’s heathland also topsoils which are a store provides opportunities. Heathland on Wimbledon Recreation Peaty soils of carbon. Fertiliser inputs into arable production. Common SAC is managed under a countryside Sense of place and soils with The remaining soil types stewardship agreement so opportunities exist high levels of are mineral soils. to improve and extend this important habitat organic matter elsewhere within the NCA. 97 per cent of London’s natural reedbeds have Considerable opportunities exist within the been lost. floodplain of the Thames within this area to create further, extensive areas of reed bed making a considerable contribution to carbon storage, water quality and regulation of water flow. Encourage the creation of woodland as part of new housing and transport infrastructure development. Encourage reduced fertiliser inputs on cultivated soils by ensuring Government guidelines (Nitrate Vulnerable Zone regulations) are followed by farmers and land managers.

44 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Regulating Rivers Groundwater in the east Regional Pressure from abstraction for the large local Support initiatives to reduce pollutants such as Water water and north of the NCA population, industries and waste from sewage improvements to water treatment systems. availability Reservoirs quality predominantly failed to treatment works, plus the fact that almost all Agricultural pollutants also come from adjacent Recreation Water achieve good chemical water bodies are heavily modified for navigation NCAs so it is important to work with farmers and meadows and status, with a thin strip of give rise to poor water quality and biological Biodiversity landowners beyond the Thames Valley itself. flood plain good chemical condition to status. Food grazing the north along the foot of Work to eradicate non-native invasive species, 48 per cent of the NCA is in a Nitrate Vulnerable provision the Chiltern Hills. particularly along riverbanks and promote Zone (NVZ) and the Colne Valley in particular is awareness of the importance of biosecurity, Within the Thames subject to agricultural run-off but also suffers Sense of Place particularly in areas of heavy public usage, to catchment, around 41 from low flows due to abstraction, over-widening, prevent their spread. Sense of percent of rivers are at poor interaction with the canal network and pollution History biological status. incidents. The Lodden catchment also suffers from Encourage woodland creation and better agricultural pollutants as well as sewage effluent. woodland management to reduce risks of soil erosion, particularly in the north-western area at Further large-scale development is also planned the southern edge of the Chiltern Hills. for this catchment so demand for water will increase while climate change will almost certainly result in additional pressure, particularly on the chalk streams and rivers feeding the area. The importance of the area for water supply means that numerous initiatives, such as improvement to sewage treatment works affecting the Maidenhead-Sunbury catchment are underway to improve water quality across the NCA and the Environment Agency and water Companies are undertaking several monitoring projects to assess ecological priorities within the Thames catchment. Many initiatives, such as modifications at Arborfield, involve a wide range of partners including water companies, government agencies, wildlife groups and landowners. Significant improvements are expected to be delivered from current projects by 2015 which include addressing pollution issues by working with sewage treatment works, restoring river geomorphology and improvements for fish passage.

45 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Regulating Rivers Flood regulation is a National The Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan There are opportunities to restore wetlands, water Regulating water flow key issue throughout identifies that further action needs to be taken meadows and reedbeds as part of large floodwater flow Reservoirs the Thames and Colne to reduce flood risk throughout the area, with management initiatives. and other Water floodplains, with the policies that include taking action with others to waterbodies The Thames Rivers Restoration Trust Action Plan availability risk of flooding affecting store water or manage run-off in locations that (2009) aims to find areas where floodwater can be Floodplains significant numbers of provide overall flood risk reduction along with safely stored, restore natural shape and function Regulating settlements. Numerous environmental benefits. and form corridors between SSSI and reserves for water quality locks and weirs are used to Kennet Valley near Reading is recognised as a key wildlife to move around. maintain water levels. Biodiversity area for water storage potential in this NCA as Optimise design and implementation of future Sense of place it is unproductive agricultural land which often flood storage areas to create new wetland floods. habitats, such as floodplain grazing marsh, and Sense of Climate change will increase flood risks in this creating links with existing semi-natural habitats. history area. Because major settlements, including Manage water bodies, including ditches, to increase London, are threatened, this is likely to be a key structural diversity which will help to retain winter driver for action. floodwater for longer and provide refuges for species vulnerable to inundation events. Encourage agricultural practices that build up organic matter and reduce the risk of soil compaction and thus improve water infiltration. Restore and expand wetland habitats on floodplains, including wet pastures, reedbeds, traditionally graze alluvial flood meadows, to attenuate flood flows. Find ways of assimilating new or reinforced flood defences into local landscapes with minimum visual impact and disruption to existing habitat or species movement. Adopt strategic approaches to increasing the capacity of catchments to retain water, including addressing river management upstream to reduce impacts on landscapes downstream, notably the vulnerable floodplain of the Thames. Allow watercourses to revert to natural, dynamic courses where possible, thus allowing the energy of the water flow to dissipate.

46 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Regulating Soil Less than 25 per cent of the Local Although the percentage of farmed land is Work with farmers, land managers and Regulating soil land is agricultural and, of small, the number of catchments makes the area landowners both within the NCA and beyond to soil quality quality this, the large majority is vulnerable to nitrate pollution from surrounding encourage best practice to reduce agricultural Regulating Grade 3 soil. areas, with the Colne Valley being particularly pollutants. water quality susceptible to agricultural run-off. Encourage reduced fertiliser inputs on cultivated Biodiversity soils by ensuring Government guidelines (NVZ regulations) are followed by farmers and land managers. Regulating Woodland The freely draining loamy Regional Freely draining loamy soils are at higher risk of Increase woodland where appropriate, and better Regulating soil soils (31 per cent) have erosion on moderately or steeply sloping land woodland management to reduce risks of soil soil erosion Permanent erosion enhanced risk of erosion. where cultivated or where bare soil is exposed, erosion, particularly in the north-western area at pasture Regulating There is the potential for exacerbated where organic matter levels are low the southern edge of the Chiltern Hills. water quality Hedgerows wind erosion on some after repeated and continuous arable cultivation Encourage best practice in the timing and coarse textured cultivated or where soils are compacted. Biodiversity direction of cultivation to reduce erosion on Loamy free variants. draining soils Where soils suffer capping or slaking there is sloping ground. Climate A few of the component an increased risk of soil erosion, and these soils regulation Where possible encourage the reinstatement soils of the freely draining need to be managed carefully to reduce this with of cross-slope hedgerows and shelterbelts to base-rich soils (8 per cent) careful timing of cultivations and maintenance of minimise down-slope migration of soil and reduce may be susceptible to vegetation cover. wind erosion particularly in areas with lighter capping and slaking. Wet acid sandy and loamy soils are easily eroded soils. The naturally wet very acid if heavily trafficked or after heavy rain. sandy and loamy soils (2 Control of invasive non native species particularly . Coarser textured variants of loamy soils with per cent) are light soils at along the riverbank to reduce soil exposure and naturally high groundwater occurring on sloping some risk of wind erosion, erosion of the bank. or uneven ground are at increased risk of erosion. The wet loamy and/or clayey soils (covering 55 per cent of the NCA) are generally at low risk of soil erosion,

47 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Pollination Heathland Sources of nectar for Local The area was once a major fruit-growing region, Degraded orchards can be restored where Pollination pollinating insects are supplying much of the fruit for London markets. practical. Woodland Biodiversity provided by the remnants This has declined and, of the orchards that Opportunities exist to use Wimbledon Common Parks and of lowland heathland (68 survive, many are derelict. However, remaining Food as an exemplar to improve and extend heathland gardens ha) found on higher sandy orchards provide reserves for pollinating insects. production within the NCA, particularly on the sandy soils soils in the north, as well Existing heathland is rare in the NCA itself but on higher ground to the north around the South Hedgerows as areas of unimproved Sense of provides vital links between sites and the area is Bucks Heaths and Parkland area. grassland found as part history Orchards adjacent to Thames Basin Heaths NCA. of wetland complexes Work with, local authorities and parishes to create Sense of place Gardens or in wood pastures multi-functional green spaces incorporating and commons, and in sympathetic management for pollination Genetic the hedgerow network. including appropriate management of road verges diversity Historic parkland and into cutting regimes, adding to the network of domestic gardens also nectar sources close to pollinated food crops. provide nectar sources. Increase the area of semi-natural habitats, with Heathland on Wimbledon particular emphasis on unimproved flower-rich Common SAC is managed grasslands (lowland meadow) and floodplain under a countryside grazing marsh. stewardship agreement. Pest Agricultural Agriculture accounts Local Development and transport networks ensure that Opportunities exist to re-link the fragmented Pest regulation field margins for no more than a such agriculture that survives is relatively low- landscape by restoring hedgerows and creating regulation quarter of the NCA, being scale but fragmented. corridors using field margins, road verges, rivers Species-rich Food virtually expelled from and railway lines to allow predator species to hedgerows production the area within the M25. move freely. Woodland The surviving farmed Biodiversity Maintain and expand the area of semi-natural landscape is fragmented habitats, throughout the NCA to provide a range Small-scale and hedgerows are often Pollination of niches to support pest regulating species mixed farming neglected. including invertebrates, birds and mammals. Historic Other land use includes Mechanisms such as agri-environment schemes, parkland and golf courses, playing fields encourage the use of field margins, beetle banks wood pasture and pony paddocks. and headlands in arable land, to encourage pest regulating species in close proximity to food crops requiring pollination.

48 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities A sense Historic The natural beauty and wealth of the National The area has attracted poets, artists, writers The area is heavily used by both Sense of place of place/ buildings set in area around the Thames has resulted in and thinkers and the landscape, particularly residents and visitors. Opportunities Recreation inspiring parkland a landscape that has inspired people for views of the Thames from various vantage exist to protect, restore and sustainably manage historic landscapes including Biodiversity places Famous views centuries. points, has been immortalised in the work of greats such as J.M.W. Turner, Sir Walter Scott those of international importance A landscape crossed by major arterial Sense of River Thames and Shakespeare. Despite the encroachment and less well known parkland/wood- routes including the M4, M40, M25, M3 history of urban development almost everywhere, pasture sites such as Haines Hill Park, Ancient and Great Western Mainline railway there are still places where open landscape accommodating high visitor numbers Climate veteran trees with associated development and can be experienced. while protecting character and regulation Views of infrastructure as well as Heathrow enhancing biodiversity. Airport but containing 58 registered Though there are still beautiful areas, this Regulating Chilterns AONB The importance of tourism to the parks and gardens covering nearly 7,000 landscape is now severely fragmented. water quality area ensures that landscape is always Waterbodies ha of river meadows, woodland to the a consideration and has resulted in Sense of north, reservoirs, wetlands and rivers, continuing initiatives to restore historic inspiration internationally recognised historic features encourage awareness and buildings and views of the Chilterns in facilitate access. These include “London’s the west. Arcadia”, a £3.3 million HLF-funded project started in 2004 to enhance public spaces, link historic sites and improve river quality and biodiversity along the Thames between Teddington and Kew. The Thames Landscape Strategy was launched in 1994 with a 100 year plan to “conserve, enhance and promote for the future, one of the world’s great urban landscapes.

49 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities A sense of Historic The area is steeped in history and sites National A sense of history is provided by landscapes Although heritage is generally valued Sense of history buildings set in include Windsor Castle, Hampton Court familiar through their depiction in art and in an NCA which is under increasing history parkland Palace and Eton College literature, sites associated with Internationally pressure from development, there are Sense of famous historic events, such as the signing of opportunities to address particular Famous views 5,009 listed buildings, over 40 of them inspiration Magna Carta at Runnymede and large houses areas of concern such as preserving 6 within the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew River Thames of historical and architectural interest set conservation areas currently “at risk” Sense of place World Heritage Site. within ornamental parkland. There are also in the area north of the M40 around Ancient Recreation Historic links to London because of timber-framed farm buildings in the western Gerrard’s Cross. Individual sites currently veteran trees the Thames and subsequent transport clay vale farmland and Victorian model farms. at risk, such as Reading Abbey may Towns and routes. Important supplier of fresh The towns themselves are overwhelmingly benefit by being incorporated into new settlement produce (especially fruit) to London historic, including the suburbs, as are the lines development as areas of greenspace or markets until 19th century. of many of the routeways, those linking places to add heritage value and sense of place. More recent within the NCA and those directed towards historic Major towns on main routes out of London. elements – London, particularly the River Thames model farms, (Windsor, Reading, Staines) but Development has been relentless, aggregate also on main roads (Gerrard’s Cross, especially during the 20th century due to extraction, Maidenhead). Particular density of fine proximity of London and good transport airport buildings surrounding sites with strong links, particularly associated with new royal associations such as Windsor, light industries around Bracknell and Richmond and Hampton. Wokingham. This is ongoing. The need to maintain Heathrow as a major international Places of recreation and retreat for airport is widely recognised. Londoners including medieval hunting parties and 18th century sightseers. The area benefits hugely from its historical assets in terms of tourism and associated heritage industries A sense of Parkland The NCA has less than 1 per cent of its Local In an area dominated by development Protect and preserve existing areas of Tranquillity tranquillity area classified as undisturbed according and crossed by major transport routes, relative tranquillity. Waterbodies Recreation to CPRE data, with 43 per cent of the perceptions of tranquillity within the NCA and rivers Incorporate measures into new area classed as urban and the rest as are particularly important. Large areas of Sense of place development that integrates green and disturbed land. parkland and woodland, as well as the water open space to enhance and extend the bodies such as reservoirs and stretches of Biodiversity network of existing undisturbed and canal and along the Thames offer some relief tranquil places. from light and noise pollution from roads and industry, though noise from aircraft Realise opportunities to introduce using Heathrow is experienced throughout greenspace, and particularly tree the NCA. planting, into existing developments to buffer and minimise the effects of noise and light pollution.

50 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Recreation Rivers Recreation is supported by over 1,000 km National Visitors from all over the world travel to this Initiatives such as the Thames Landscape Recreation of rights of way, including the Thames NCA to enjoy attractions such as Hampton Strategy Riverside Management Plan Parkland Sense of Path National Trail, 3 NNRs and national Court, Windsor and the Royal Botanic incorporate measures to encourage history Commons cycleways. The historic parklands, Gardens at Kew. visitors such as improved access and commons, woodlands and waterbodies, cycle routes while also enhancing Sense of place The non-tidal Thames is a prime recreation National Trail including reservoirs, canal towpaths the quality of experience by clearing resource. The rivers, canal and other and Cycleway and the Thames itself are also important invasive non-native species, litter Biodiversity waterbodies provide the focus for numerous assets, many being publicly accessible. and planting hedges and trees to aid Lakes and pursuits such as boating, bird-watching and Tranquillity biodiversity. reservoirs angling, representing valuable amenities Historic houses within the heavily urbanised context. Measures to improve water quality and flood measures include opportunities for Village greens recreational activities. Biodiversity Broadleaved There are over 5,500 ha of BAP priority National Despite its urban character, this NCA is Measures to improve water quality and Biodiversity woodland habitat covering around 6 per cent of important for biodiversity with Windsor improve flood management will also Regulating the NCA. This includes over 2,500 ha Great Park being one of the most important benefit biodiversity with the creation Wet woodland water quality of woodland and around 2,000 ha of sites in Britain for invertebrates and fungi. of new wetlands and wetland habitats Wet meadows wetland habitat plus around 70 ha of The water bodies in the area support large and restored rivers forming corridors for Regulating lowland heathland. Over 800 ha of water assemblages of and a range of wildfowl. The wildlife between sites water flow Heathland bodies within the area are internationally meadows and pastures of the river valleys Some heathland in the area is already Regulating Dry acid designated as SPA and Ramsar for their are important for wading birds supporting managed under a countryside soil quality grassland importance to wildfowl. The NCA also breeding populations of lapwing, snipe, stewardship agreement so opportunities contains 4 SACs (Windsor Forest and curlew and redshank. Large numbers also Sense of place Ancient Great Park, Burnham Beeches, Richmond exist to improve and extend this over-winter on the flood plain, particularly woodland Park and Wimbledon Common) covering important habitat within the NCA Pollination lapwing and golden plover Rivers over 3,000 ha and Royal Botanic Gardens The creation of green and blue at Kew World Heritage Site. The area’s water bodies carry over 1 per cent Reservoirs infrastructure associated with new The gravel beds of the upper tideway of British wintering populations of tufted development can bring benefits for Canals are an important nursery ground for duck, pochard, goosander and numbers of biodiversity. several species of North Sea fish notably shoveler are internationally significant Parkland and Measures to ease fish passage, such flounder. wood pasture Though heathland area is small, it provides as elver ladders, will increase the vital links between larger areas in adjacent Commons A small part of the buffer Zone for population in the freshwater Thames Thames Basin Heaths SPA falls within the NCAs, particularly Thames Basin Heaths. upstream to the benefit of eels and other NCA. Juvenile eel populations in the River Thames aquatic species. have fallen by 98 per cent in the last five years (ZSL).

51 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Service Assets/attributes: State Main Analysis Opportunities Principal main contributors beneficiary services offered to service by opportunities Geodiversity 3 Geological The alluvial terraces alongside the Regional Former mineral extraction sites have been Manage former extraction sites for their Biodiversity SSSI Thames provide significant gravel yields landscaped and resulted in the creation of range of mutually beneficial interests Water and have been extensively excavated. internationally important water bodies. including geodiversity, biodiversity, 4 Local availability industrial heritage and educational Geological There are important geological Much carbon was stored when the chalk purposes. Sense of place Sites exposures, including those of the deposits were formed. Reading Beds, the Upper Chalk and Work to improve the condition of Regulating The geological SSSI provide important access London Clay, plus the only known designated sites. water flow to geodiversity, enabling interpretation, British example of a late Santonian-early understanding and continued research. Engage communities and property Tranquillity Campanian chalk phosphorite deposit Exposure of these features also makes a owners in encouraging use of local at South Lodge Pit. The sediments are an Recreation positive contribution towards sense of building materials. important resource for palaeontological place and sense of history. Accessible fossil Climate study. Develop restorative management exposures are particularly good for instilling regulation of Local Geological Sites offering a sense of history in young children. opportunities for volunteering and Sense of community engagement. history Maintain views of geological features and exposures and where appropriate, improve access to cuttings, quarries and other exposures of geological features to promote understanding and enjoyment.

52 National Character 115. Thames Valley Area profile: Supporting documents

Photo credits Front cover: London Wetland Centre © Natural England/Glen Cooper Page 4, 14, 27 & 34 © Natural England/Catherine Tonge Page 5 © Natural England/Paul Glendell Page 7, 13, 15 & 19 © Natural England/Anne-Katrin Purkiss Page 8 & 17 © Natural England/Peter Wakely Page 25 © Natural England/John Tyler Page 18 & 28 © Environment Agency

Natural England is here to secure a healthy natural environment for people to enjoy, where wildlife is protected and England’s traditional landscapes are safeguarded for future generations.

ISBN: 978-1-78367-171-7 Catalogue Code: NE379

Natural England publications are available as accessible pdfs from www.gov.uk/natural-england. Should an alternative format of this publication be required, please contact our enquiries line for more information: 0845 600 3078 or email [email protected]

This publication is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence v3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3

Please note: Natural England photographs are only available for non-commercial purposes. For information regarding the use of maps or data visit www.gov.uk/how-to-access-natural-englands-maps-and-data. © Natural England 2015

53 Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020

APPENDIX C: Wokingham Borough Council: 2004 Landscape Character Assessment. Type J: Settled and Farmed Clay: Sub Category J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

| 37

Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

J4: WOODLEY-EARLEY SETTLED AND FARMED CLAY

DESCRIPTION

Introduction 14.71 The Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay is located in the east of the district west of Reading. In common with the Wokingham- Winnersh Settled and Farmed Clay this area is densely settled. Falling almost entirely within established settlement boundaries, this area is not within the study area boundary (which specifically excludes the larger settlements). However, an assessment of the Wokingham landscape would be incomplete without reference to the district’s most extensive area of settlement and therefore an outline assessment of the landscape and its contribution to wider landscape character is included here (it is not a detailed townscape or urban character assessment).

14.72 The Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay is one of the most densely settled areas of the district with a strong urban and suburban character. Development is predominantly composed of post-war housing estates with associated commercial and institutional uses. Within the settled area there are pockets of open space, some large, which are public parks or associated with the grounds of institutions such as the University of Reading, schools and colleges. Many of these are wooded and located in prominent elevated locations or occupying linear corridors associated with the small tributary streams that cross the settled area. Location and Boundaries 14.73 Located east of which is contiguous with the urban area of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay, this area is to a large extent delineated by the administrative boundary. To the north a natural landscape boundary occurs defined by the transition to the floodplain landscape of the Thames River Valley (A1) and the distinctive Sonning Wooded Chalk Slopes (D2). To the east the boundary is defined by

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 339 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

the abrupt transition to the natural floodplain landscape of the Loddon River Valley with Open Water (B1). This boundary is largely defined by roads (including a section of the M4) along the floodplain edge and/or the edge of the current settlement limit.

Key Characteristics

• A highly urbanised landscape due the presence of the town of Reading and the extension of settlement (Woodley and Earley) into their former agricultural hinterland.

• Marginal agricultural land with a small remaining area of rural land (in the north) exhibiting an urban fringe character and defined by remnant fragment of arable agricultural land.

• The urban landscape is defined by dense settlement with post war and modern estates around earlier Victorian buildings and former country houses.

• Overriding suburban and urban character exaggerated by the developed network of roads including ‘A’ roads and the M4.

• Gently rolling clay ridge enclosing the Loddon Valley to the west, capped with linear bands of older river terrace outcrops, but largely imperceptible due to the urban influence.

• A number of Wildlife Heritage Sites both woodland and open water. Small tributary streams, many of which have been dammed to form lakes.

• The setting for the residential areas are enhanced by the subtly wooded ridgeline and stream corridors

• Generally an enclosed landscape but with some good views over surrounding lowlands from the open areas at the edge of the settled area.

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 340 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Physical Landscape 14.74 The Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay character area is based upon a gently rolling area underlain by London Clay, between the valleys of the Thames and Loddon, which rises from around 40m AOD to a ridge of land at between 60 and 80m AOD. Being located close to two important valley landscapes this area has been extensively overlain by a series of gravels relating to ancient river terraces. The soils produced are largely argillic brown earths with stagnogleys in the south, which are capable of supporting mixed farmland with woodland retained on the sandier and gravely areas.

14.75 There are a number of small, tributaries of the Loddon, which drain through this area in an easterly direction to connect to the Old River. Due to the urban situation these have been culverted/canalised in parts but they also form the basis for open spaces where they flow through open parkland. The principal lakes of the area are the large forked water body at Whiteknights campus, South Lake, and the pond near Long Moor. There is also a lake relating to the flooded former gravel extraction near Ashenbury Park with links to the Loddon River Valley with Open Water (B1). There was once also an additional large lake in the area – North Lake – close to South Lake, but this has been infilled. Historic Environment 14.76 The modern settlement dominates this landscape. However, Woodley and Earley (a Domesday settlement) contain “-leah” thus indicating early settlement was in a wooded landscape, which is further supported by the irregular boundaries (suggesting assart inclosures) of surviving areas of woodland, such as Alder Moor. A small area of the remaining undeveloped land to the north retains cropmarks indicative of Roman agriculture set within predominantly 20th century enclosure patterns.

14.77 The 1st edition OS map shows Woodley and Earley as small rural communities within a landscape comprising a mix of irregular and straight-sided fields, as well as extensive areas of parkland associated with large country houses such as Whiteknights Park (possibly the site of a Medieval deerpark at Earley, and now the

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 341 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

campus of Reading University), Bulmershe Court (now demolished, but built in 1777 with grounds designed by Capability Brown in an Italianate style), Maiden Early and Shinfield Lodge. The ornamental grounds of Whiteknights were once famous for their collection of plants collected by the Marquess of Blandford, later fifth Duke of Marlborough.

14.78 The Bath Road passes through the area, as does the Great Western Railway line, completed in 1840, at the point where it enters the Sonning cutting. Planned urban development after World War II encouraged by the success of Reading was stimulated by the A329(M) motorway which connects the area to the M4 motorway. Woodley and Earley were both granted town status in 1974.

Designations Summary of Importance

Scheduled Ancient Monuments

BCC. No. 176 Cropmark S. of Charvil Lane

BCC. No. 177 Cropmark N E of Model Farm Cottages.

Regional Archaeological Site

These sites are associated with the SAMs and also include areas south of Charvill, near Moor Copse and fields E of Shire Hall (N of M4)

Conservation Area

Woodley Green

Sonning

Listed Buildings

There are two within the Woodley Green conservation area. Elsewhere there are about sixteen individual buildings scattered across the area - relatively few given the size of the settled area. These include a number at Whiteknights and the college north of the M4, but are otherwise domestic in nature.

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 342 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Designations Summary of Importance

English Heritage Register of Historic Parks and Gardens

None.

Ecological Character 14.79 Although the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay is dominated by urban development, it has retained a significant number of sites of nature conservation value. This includes a variety of habitat types such as acid woodland, wet woodland, heathland and open water. In total there are two Local Nature Reserves and nine Wildlife Heritage Sites within this character area.

14.80 One of the Local Nature Reserves known as High Wood represents a substantial woodland block of some 15ha. It is acid oak woodland with hazel (Corylus avellana), wych elm (Ulmus glabra), sweet chestnut (Castinea sativa) and a ground layer dominated by bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) and bramble (Rubus fruiticosus). A small area of remnant heathland has been retained on the north side of the wood. Management of this site has focused on the removal of invasive species such as rhododendron (Rhodoendron ponticum) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus).

14.81 Of the woodland sites only Redhatch Copse is recognised as being of ancient origin, it is typical of the coppice woodlands in the District being dominated by oak (Quercus robur) and hazel. The remaining woodland sites are represented by small secondary woods, with eight having Wildlife Heritage Site status. The majority of these are wet woods are characterised by ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and alder (Alnus glutinosa) with notable ground layer species including opposite- leaved golden-saxifrage (Chrysosplenium oppositifolium) and marsh marigold (Caltha palustris).

Designations Summary of Importance

Sites of Special Scientific Interest

None

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 343 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Designations Summary of Importance

Local Nature Reserves

Highwood 15.1ha Woodland

Maiden Early Lakes and Woods10.1ha Open water, woodland

Aldermoors Mixed ancient semi-natural and secondary wet woodland

Ali’s Pond A small lined pond with a meadow surrounding it and two lengths of species rich hedgerow.

Wildlife Heritage Site/Registered Ancient Woodland

Redhatch Copse 3.7 / 3.7ha Ancient woodland

Pearmans Copse Ancient woodland

Oak Wood Ancient woodland

Moor Copse Ancient woodland

Waingel Copse Ancient woodland

Wildlife Heritage Site

Rushey Way Pond 0.1ha Open water

Old Pond Copse / Moor Copse 5.7ha Woodland

Southlake Park 6.8ha Open water, woodland

Whiteknights Park 26.2ha Woodland

Bulmershe Carr 0.7ha Wet woodland, open water

Alder Moors 11.1ha Woodland, open water

Norris’s Copse 8.4ha Woodland

Sandpit Copse 1.4ha Woodland

High Wood 15.09ha Woodland

Sandford Fen 3.66ha Calcareous woodland

The Moors Open meadow, wetlands, meadows

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 344 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Rural Land Use 14.82 There is relatively little land in this character area that could be considered ‘rural’. There are a few remnant fragments of relatively flat arable agricultural land located north of the Bath Road to the south of Sonning Farm – the teaching farm of the University of Reading.

14.83 Elsewhere within this area the land, which has not been given over to built development (and gardens) is used as public open space and typical urban fringe recreation spaces. This includes a large (but relatively well screened and infrequently visible) golf course at Charvil Hill. There are also a large number of playing fields associated with the schools including those north of the Bath Road. A number of the public parks or grounds of the large institutions have a natural character (including areas of important habitat) such as the bird sanctuary associated with the restored gravel workings at Ashenbury Park, The Moor Copse Recreation Ground and High Wood. Based upon former designed landscapes some of these areas including Whiteknights campus retain a parkland feel. There are also a small number of allotment sites in this character area.

14.84 The presence of wooded and open space within the urban framework (and street trees), particularly where they are associated with the more elevated areas is very important and provides a verdant counterpoint to the built fabric both from within and when viewed across the valley. The open spaces also permit occasional views out into the surrounding landscape, such as the views of the Loddon Valley from the reservoir site near Redhatch Copse. Settlement and Built Character 14.85 This area is extensively settled. The settlement has largely expanded due to the outwards growth of Reading and therefore the new settlement can be seen to have not so much expanded out from the older cores of Woodley Green, Earley and Butts Hill, but to have engulfed these earlier centres from the east with a disaggregated grid of planned post WW2 estates, culminating in the modern housing estates at the fringe of the area adjacent to the Loddon Valley. Early and Woodley are both settlements historically associated with the

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 345 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Loddon Valley. There is no discernable vernacular – the presence of older buildings in the historic cores being subsumed within the suburban architecture of later buildings. The historic core at Woodley Green is a Conservation Area.

EVALUATION

Landscape Quality 14.86 The landscape of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay (I4) (outside the settled area) is evaluated as being of moderate quality. Although character is generally weak, it is overall in moderate condition. The weak character relates to the fact that there are no obvious or striking landscape characteristics and the remaining land use is fragmented and lacks unity. The characteristics are in overall moderate condition. Although many features have been lost, many that remain are generally in good repair but there are numerous opportunities for improvement of other elements. Those aspects making a definite contribution to the landscape quality are settlement and built form, the presence of wildlife habitats and the former historic parkland at Whiteknights.

Landscape Strategy 14.87 The overall objective for the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay is to enhance remaining landscape features with opportunities to renew/create landscape character where the agricultural land has become marginal and fragmented due to urban pressures. This entails promoting positive change and management, whilst restoring lost elements which would enhance the character of the new landscape. Woodland planting is a key opportunity.

Landscape Sensitivity 14.88 The landscape components generally have a low or low-moderate degree of sensitivity. These different sensitivities combine to give the landscape of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay a low sensitivity overall with most characteristics important at the local scale. The most sensitive characteristics are the remnant historic parkland surviving as recreation areas/campus and the surviving

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 346 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

woodland, particularly the area of ancient woodland. Visual sensitivity is judged to be moderate. Although much of the landscape is enclosed, some good views can be gained over the surrounding lowlands from the open areas at the edge of the settled area.

The Changing Landscape: Key Issues 14.89 The following table sets out the main issues affecting the character of the Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay (J4) and the associated management guidelines for dealing with these issues. The overall objective is to ensure that the landscape is appropriately managed to enhance the distinctiveness and strength of character of the remaining fragments of undeveloped land through the renewal/creation of landscape character.

Key Issues Associated Guidelines Agriculture

Hedgerow loss and soil erosion is • Conserve hedgerows as important evident - this is associated with wildlife habitats and landscape the intensification of agriculture. features and promote This particularly applies to the management of hedgerows as area between Sonning and coppice, with oak standards left to Woodley. form future timber trees. Consider opportunities for

reinstatement of hedges, particularly where they have been lost from highly visible locations e.g. along roadsides.

Presence of marginal agricultural • Seek to maintain a positive land being kept in ‘hope’ value, interface between the built up and particularly around settlement rural areas to provide an edges, which is of poor visual appropriate setting for the character. settlement.

Forestry and Woodland Management

Loss of structure and species • Conserve all ancient woodland diversity of the traditionally sites, and continue to promote coppiced woodlands has occurred appropriate management through in the past through cessation of natural regeneration, control of coppice management and built non-native species and development. reintroduction of coppicing as a management tool for neglected

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 347 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Key Issues Associated Guidelines woodlands. Continue to manage the former parkland areas.

• Further woodland planting is a key opportunity in this area.

Minerals

Not likely to be an issue.

Habitat/Natural Features

Over-maturity of veteran parkland • Consider a tree planting and street trees is an on-going programme to plan for the next concern. generation of parkland and street trees.

Recreation

High demands for recreation • Seek sympathetic integration of including recreational facilities. new recreational features and seek to locate such activities in areas of lowest tranquillity.

Pressure for golf courses that have • Golf courses to be sympathetically an impact on the character of the sited and integrated into the landscape. landscape.

Pressure for more pony paddocks, • Develop guidance on management particularly at settlement edges of paddocks - to be sensitive to leading to a decrease in rural existing landscape character by intactness. retaining features of the landscape such as hedgerows.

Built Development

Demand for residential • Protect the individual identity of development is continuing to push settlements by conserving the towards the amalgamation of undeveloped character of the adjacent built areas and landscape around the settlement fragmentation of the remnant edge. This particularly applies to open rural landscape. the vulnerable area of land located between Woodley and the Thames

Valley/Sonning and across the Loddon near Winnersh.

Dilution of vernacular character • Conserve historic buildings and and loss of distinct architectural consider undertaking built style. character appraisals across the District to identify local styles,

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 348 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Key Issues Associated Guidelines layouts, densities and materials that may be appropriate in new buildings and the spaces between these buildings.

There is continuing pressure for • Consider undertaking character expansion and infill within appraisals of settlements within existing settlements leading to Wokingham District to identify loss of features such as trees, features worthy of conservation. woodland and historic features.

There is continuing pressure for • Undertake sensitive woodland new industrial developments and planting to reduce the intrusion of commercial premises, particularly the motorway, other major roads associated with the major and large buildings. transport corridors.

Pressure for expansion of built • Consider possibilities for development on the edges of woodland creation in urban fringe towns is leading to areas where these could enhance suburbanisation of the landscape, landscape character and quality, loss of individual settlement provide recreational potential, and identity and blocking of views. assist in the positive integration of the urban into the rural landscape while conserving significant views to landmark features.

Demand for industrial buildings • Care should be taken in the siting associated with transport and design of industrial buildings corridors leading to visual and estates to ensure that key intrusion of these elements in the landscape characteristics are landscape. maintained.

Pressure for built development on • Consider the impact of any the skyline is leading to loss of development on skylines – where wooded ridges which are it would have the potential to be characteristic of the Wokingham highly visible from adjacent landscape. character areas. Retain the wooded skylines of Wokingham.

Infrastructure

No significant additional issues.

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 349 Character Area J4: Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay

Wokingham District Landscape Character Assessment 350

APPENDIX D: Landscape Supporting Graphics

38 |

K E Y

Site Boundary

Kilometre line fromK Ecentre Y of the Site Site Boundary

Kilometre line from centre of the Site

K E Y

Site Boundary 3km 2km 1km

Kilometre line from centre of 3km 2km 1km the Site

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 revision date description dwn chkd W www.enplan.net

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard project Miltonscale Keynes MK9 2AHN/A1:25000 @ A3 06-941 T 01908 303701 Land to the West of theW www.enplan.netdate Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title projectdrawn by scale DLC N/A1:25000 @ A3 Site Context 06-941 (Location of Wider Viewpoints) Landchecked to the West of the date RH Range, Sonning Sep 2020 drawing number title revision drawn by - DLC Site Context Figure 1 (Location of Wider Viewpoints) checked RH DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 drawing number revision - Figure 1

3km 2km 1km DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A1:25000 @ A3 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by DLC Site Context (Location of Wider Viewpoints) checked RH

drawing number revision B Figure 1

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 K E Y

Site Boundary

10-15m AOD

15-20m AOD

20-25m AOD

25-30m AOD

35-40m AOD

40-45m AOD

45-50m AOD

50-55m AOD

55-60m AOD

60-65m AOD

65-70m AOD

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A1:25000 @A3 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by DLC Topography Plan checked RH drawing number revision B Figure 2

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Site Boundary

County Boundary

Site of Architectural Interest

Conservation Area

Site of Urban Value

Local Nature Reserve

Local Wildlife Site

EA Flood Zone 3

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A1:25000 @A3 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by DLC Landscape Designation Plan checked RH drawing number revision B Figure 3

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 K E Y

Site Boundary

Extent of ZTV

Location of reference markers

Radius lines from site centre in km

Notes:

Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV)

The reference marker could possibly be seen from within the area shaded red. The reference marker is at the highest point of the proposed buildings are Block A 12.2m, Block B 12.2m and Block C 11.46m above proposed ground level.

A ZTV map illustrates the potential (or theoretical) visibility of an object in the landscape. This analysis takes into account landscape features such as wooded groups and buildings etc. The analysis is made using Environment Agency Lidar data, survey information, aerial photography and local knowledge.

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A1:25000 @ A3 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by DLC Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) With checked Buffers RH drawing number revision B Figure 4

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 K E Y

Site Boundary 1 K E Y

Location of Site Views Site Boundary 1

Location of Wider Viewpoints Location of Site Views

Location of Wider Viewpoints 2

3 2

4 B 3 A 6 5 4 B 7 A 6 5 C K E Y Site Boundary 1 K E Y Location of Site Views

Location of Wider Viewpoints 7 D 2 HC 3 4 B A E 6 5 Site Boundary 7 C

DD G H E 1 G F H

E revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes F Sonning Gate MK9 2AH Golf Club T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net 8 project scale N/A G 06-941 9 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by DLC Landscape and Visual (Location of Viewpoints and Site checked Appraisal Views) RH

drawing number revision Location of- Site Views Figure 5 revision date description dwn chkd F DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Sonning Gate MK9 2AH Golf Club revision date description dwn chkd T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard 8 Location of Wider Viewpoints Milton Keynes Sonning Gate project MK9 2AH scale Golf Club N/A 06-941 T 01908 303701 9 W www.enplan.net Land to the West of the date 8 Sep 2020 Range, Sonningproject scale title drawn by N/A 9 06-941 DLC Landscape andLand Visual to the West of the date (Location of Viewpoints and Site checked Sep 2020 Appraisal Views)Range, SonningRH title drawn by drawing number revision DLC Landscape and Visual- 2 (Location of Viewpoints and Site checked Figure 5 Appraisal Views) RH

DO NOT SCALE FROM drawingTHIS DRAWING number I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 revision - Figure 5 3 DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542

B 4 A 6 5

7 C J D H E G

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Sonning Gate MK9 2AH Golf Club T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net 8 project scale N/A 9 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by DLC Landscape and Visual (Location of Viewpoints and Site checked Appraisal Views) RH

drawing number revision B Figure 5

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 K E YK E Y

Site BoundarySite Boundary K E Y K E Y LF1 - KnowleLF1 -Site Knowle Hill Boundary to Hill to LeatherheadLeatherhead Rolling RollingClay Clay Site Boundary FarmlandFarmland

LF2 - ClaygateLF2 -LF1 Claygate Rolling - Knowle RollingClay Hill toClay Farmland Leatherhead Rolling Clay FarmlandLF1 - Knowle Hill to Farmland Leatherhead Rolling Clay Farmland LR2 - OckhamLR2 -LF2 Ockham and - Claygate Clandon and Clandon Rolling Clay Wooded RollingFarmland Clayland WoodedLF2 - Claygate Rolling Clayland Rolling Clay Farmland LR2 - Ockham and Clandon LW2 - PrinceLW2 - PrinceCoverts Coverts to to LeatherheadWooded Common Rolling Clay Clayland LeatherheadLR2 - Ockham Common and Clandon Clay Woodland WoodlandWooded Rolling Clayland

RF7- LowerRF7- LW2WeyLower -River Prince Wey River Coverts to Floodplain Leatherhead Common Clay FloodplainLW2 - Prince Coverts to Woodland Leatherhead Common Clay Woodland RF10- LowerRF10-RF7- MoleLower Lower River Mole Wey River River Floodplain Floodplain FloodplainRF7- Lower Wey River Floodplain

RV4 - SendRV4 -RF10-River Send Valley LowerRiver Floor ValleyMole RiverFloor Floodplain RF10- Lower Mole River K E Y Floodplain Site Boundary SS9 - WeybridgeSS9 -RV4 Weybridge -Settled Send RiverSettled and Valley and Floor WoodedWooded Sandy SandyFarmland Farmland B1 - River Valley with Open RV4 - Send River Valley Floor Water. Loddon River Valley

D2 - Wooded Chalk Slopes SW5 - Wisley Sandy Woodland Sonning Wooded Chalk Slopes SW5 SS9- Wisley - Weybridge Sandy Woodland Settled and Wooded Sandy Farmland J4 - Settled and Farmed Clay SS9 - Weybridge Settled and Woodley-Earley Settled and Farmed Clay Wooded Sandy Farmland SW6 - FairmileSW6 SW5- Fairmile to -Esher Wisley to SandyEsher Sandy Sandy Woodland WoodlandWoodland SW5 - Wisley Sandy Woodland

SW6 - Fairmile to Esher Sandy Woodland SW6 - Fairmile to Esher Sandy Woodland

revision date description dwn chkd revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Milton Keynes MK9 2AH revision date description dwn chkd revision date description dwn chkd MK9 2AH revision date description dwn chkd Gloucester House, T 01908 303701 399 Silbury Boulevard T 01908Gloucester 303701 House, Milton Keynes W www.enplan.net MK9 2AH W www.enplan.net399 Silbury Boulevard

T 01908 303701 GloucesterMilton Keynes House, W www.enplan.net 399 MK9Silbury 2AH Boulevard project Milton Keynes scale project scale project scale N/A1:25000 @ A3 MK9T 2AH 01908 303701 06-941 W www.enplan.net N/A1:25000 @ A3 date N/A1:25000 @ A3 Land to the West of the 06-941T 01908 303701 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 06-941 W www.enplan.net date title drawn by Land to the West of the date DLC Landscape Character Landproject to the West of theSep 2020 scale Sep 2020 Areas checked Range, Sonning RH Range, Sonning N/A1:25000 @ A3 title project drawn by scale drawing number revision title 06-941 drawn by B N/A1:25000 @ A3 DLC date Figure 6 Landscape06-941Land Character to the West of theDLC Landscape Character Sep 2020 DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 checked date Areas LandRange, to the Sonning West of the checked Areas Sep 2020 title RH drawn by Range, Sonning RH DLC drawn by drawing numbertitle drawingLandscape number Characterrevision revisionDLC - checked LandscapeAreas Character - RH FigureFigureAreas 6 6 checked RH drawing number revision DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 DO drawingNOT SCALE number FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHTrevision AL100035542- Figure 6 - Figure 6 DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 View A - Viewpoint looking south east across the Application Site towards The Lawns from the northern boundary

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A View B - Viewpoint taken looking south west across the Application Site towards The Lawns from the northern boundary 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by Views A & B DLC

checked RH

drawing number revision Figure 7 B

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 View C - Viewpoint looking north west across the Application Site to the rear of The Lawns

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by View D - Viewpoint looking south east across the Application Site towards The Range from the western boundary Views C & D DLC

checked RH

drawing number revision Figure 8 B

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 View E - Viewpoint taken looking south across the Application Site towards The Red Lodge from the boundary

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 View F - Viewpoint taken from the southern boundary looking north across the Application Site towards the rear of The Red Lodge title drawn by Views E & F DLC

checked RH

drawing number revision Figure 9 B

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 View G - Viewpoint taken looking north across the Site from the midpoint of the southern boundary towards the rear of The Range

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 View H - Viewpoint taken from the south eastern corner boundary of the Application Site looking west towards the side of The Range title drawn by Views G & H DLC checked RH

drawing number revision Figure 10 B

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 View J - Viewpoint taken looking west across the Application Site from the eastern boundary towards the side of The Range

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by View J DLC checked RH

drawing number revision Figure 11 B

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Garde Road Approximate Location of Application Site

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint taken from road adjacent to Garde Road looking south towards Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard the Application Site Milton Keynes Viewpoint 1 1 MK9 2AH (Residential & Movement Corridor) T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

Visual Sensitivity High (Residential) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) project scale N/A 06-941 Camera Type Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Land to the West of the date Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 1 DLC checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD drawing number revision Figure 12 B Distance to Site 180m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Sunrise of Sonning Old Approximate Location A4 Bath Road Peoples Home of Application Site

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint taken looking south west towards the Application Site from the Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Viewpoint 2 footpath/ cycle way alongside the A4 Bath Road MK9 2AH (Recreational & Movement Corridor) T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net 2 Visual Sensitivity High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) project scale N/A 06-941 Camera Type Land to the West of the date Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by DLC Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 2 checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD drawing number revision Figure 13 B Distance to Site 70m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Approximate Location Old Bath Road A4 Bath Road of Application Site

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint taken looking south west towards the Application Site adjacent to the Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard entrance to Sunrise of Sonning Old Peoples Home Milton Keynes Viewpoint 3 MK9 2AH (Recreational & Movement Corridor) T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

Visual Sensitivity High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) 3 project scale N/A 06-941 Camera Type Land to the West of the date Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 3 DLC checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD drawing number revision Figure 14 B Distance to Site 60m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Old Bath Road Approximate Location of Application Site

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint taken looking south east towards the Application Site Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard (Recreational & Movement Corridor) Milton Keynes Viewpoint 4 MK9 2AH T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

Visual Sensitivity project scale High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) N/A 06-941 4 Land to the West of the date Camera Type Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Sep 2020 Range, Sonning title drawn by Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 4 DLC checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD drawing number revision Figure 15 B Distance to Site 20m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Old Bath Road Approximate Location of Application Site

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, Viewpoint taken looking south towards the Application Site 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Viewpoint 5 (Recreational & Movement Corridor) MK9 2AH T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) Visual Sensitivity project scale N/A 5 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Type Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Sep 2020 Range, Sonning title drawn by Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 5 DLC checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD drawing number revision Figure 16 B Distance to Site 8m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 A4 Bath Road Sunrise of Sonning Old Approximate Location Old Bath Road Peoples Home of Application Site

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, Viewpoint taken looking south east towards the Application Site from the footpath 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Viewpoint 6 adjacent to A4 Bath Road MK9 2AH T 01908 303701 (Recreational & Movement Corridor) W www.enplan.net

Visual Sensitivity High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Type Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Sep 2020 Range, Sonning 6 title drawn by DLC Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 6 checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD drawing number revision Figure 17 B Distance to Site 120m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 A4 Bath Road Sunrise of Sonning Old Approximate Location Old Bath Road Peoples Home of Application Site

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, Viewpoint taken looking south east towards the Application Site from the footpath 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Viewpoint 7 adjacent to Old Bath Road MK9 2AH T 01908 303701 (Recreational & Movement Corridor) W www.enplan.net High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) Visual Sensitivity project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Type Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Sep 2020 Range, Sonning 7 title drawn by DLC Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 7 checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD drawing number revision Figure 18 B Distance to Site 110m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Approximate Location Sonning Golf of Application Site Course

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint taken looking north towards the Application Site from the edge of Carpark Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard at Sonning Golf Club (private view) Milton Keynes Viewpoint 8 MK9 2AH (Recreational & Movement Corridor) T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net

Visual Sensitivity High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Type Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Sep 2020 Range, Sonning title drawn by DLC Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 8 checked RH Approx Elevation 50m AOD 8 drawing number revision Figure 19 B Distance to Site 195m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Approximate Location Sonning Golf of Application Site Course

22.09.2020

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, Viewpoint taken looking north towards the Application Site from inside of the 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes Viewpoint 9 Carpark at Sonning Golf Club (private view) MK9 2AH T 01908 303701 (Recreational & Movement Corridor) W www.enplan.net

Visual Sensitivity High (Users of the Footpath) Moderate (Users of the Public Highway) project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Type Nikon D3100 with 35mm lens equivalent Sep 2020 Range, Sonning title drawn by Date 22.09.2020 Viewpoint 9 DLC checked RH Approx Elevation 27m AOD 9 drawing number revision Figure 20 B Distance to Site 215m

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 2) Existing

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 2 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

OS grid reference X 476408 Y 175057 T 01908 303701 Ground height 54.99m AOD W www.enplan.net 2 View direction South project scale N/A Distance to site boundary 70m 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Nikon D3100 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 Lens 18.0 – 55.0 mm f’3.5 – 5.6 title drawn by Photomontage DLC Focal Length 35mm equ. 52mm Viewpoint 2 checked Camera height 1.65m (Existing) RH

Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.02am Figure 21 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 2) Year 1

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 2 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.02am Figure 22 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 2) Year 15

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 2 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.02am Figure 23 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 7) Existing

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 7 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

OS grid reference X 476277 Y 174943 T 01908 303701 Ground height 55.32m AOD W www.enplan.net

View direction East project scale N/A Distance to site boundary 50m 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Nikon D3100 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 7 title drawn by Lens 18.0 – 55.0 mm f’3.5 – 5.6 DLC Focal Length 35mm equ. 52mm Photomontage Viewpoint 7 checked Camera height 1.65m (Existing) RH Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.18am Figure 24 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 7) Year 1

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 7 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

OS grid reference X 476277 Y 174943 T 01908 303701 Ground height 55.32m AOD W www.enplan.net

View direction East project scale N/A Distance to site boundary 50m 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Nikon D3100 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 7 title drawn by Lens 18.0 – 55.0 mm f’3.5 – 5.6 DLC Focal Length 35mm equ. 52mm Photomontage Viewpoint 7 checked Camera height 1.65m (Year 1) RH Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.18am Figure 25 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 7) Year 15

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 7 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

OS grid reference X 476277 Y 174943 T 01908 303701 Ground height 55.32m AOD W www.enplan.net

View direction East project scale N/A Distance to site boundary 50m 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Nikon D3100 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 Lens 18.0 – 55.0 mm f’3.5 – 5.6 7 title drawn by Photomontage DLC Focal Length 35mm equ. 52mm Viewpoint 7 checked Camera height 1.65m (Year 15) RH

Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.18am Figure 26 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 9) Existing (private view)

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 9 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

OS grid reference X 476451 Y 174664 T 01908 303701 Ground height 54.42m AOD W www.enplan.net

View direction North project scale N/A Distance to site boundary 215m 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Nikon D3100 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by Lens 18.0 – 55.0 mm f’3.5 – 5.6 DLC Focal Length 35mm equ. 52mm Photomontage Viewpoint 9 checked Camera height 1.65m RH 9 (Existing) Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.33am Figure 27 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (View 9) Year 1 (private view)

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 9 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

OS grid reference X 476451 Y 174664 T 01908 303701 Ground height 54.42m AOD W www.enplan.net

View direction North project scale N/A Distance to site boundary 215m 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Nikon D3100 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by Lens 18.0 – 55.0 mm f’3.5 – 5.6 DLC Focal Length 35mm equ. 52mm Photomontage Viewpoint 9 checked Camera height 1.65m RH 9 (Year 1) Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.33am Figure 28 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 Photomontage (Viewpoint 9) Year 15 (private view)

revision date description dwn chkd

Viewpoint 9 Information Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

OS grid reference X 476451 Y 174664 T 01908 303701 Ground height 54.42m AOD W www.enplan.net

View direction North project scale N/A Distance to site boundary 215m 06-941 Land to the West of the date Camera Nikon D3100 Range, Sonning Sep 2020 title drawn by Lens 18.0 – 55.0 mm f’3.5 – 5.6 DLC Focal Length 35mm equ. 52mm Photomontage Viewpoint 9 checked Camera height 1.65m RH 9 (Year 15) Date 21 September 2020 drawing number revision Time 11.33am Figure 29 B Weather Conditions Clear and bright sun

DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING I COPYRIGHT AL100035542 N Note: The material contained in this document has been reproduced from an Ordnance Survey map with permissionof the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Proposed Trees Office. Crown Copyright Licence number AL100035542 Acer campestre ‘Streetwise’, Specimens Malus tschnoskii Magnolia loebneri 'Merrill' Prunus avium plena Cornus kousa var. chinensis Old Bath Road Carpinus betulus Hamamelis x intermedia pallida Betula pendula Euonymus alatus Quercus robur Laurus nobilis - topiary cones Amelanchier lamarckii Hydrangea paniculata 'Limelight' Sorbus aucuparia Syringa vulgaris 'Charles Joly' SITE BOUNDARY Liquidambar styraciflua 'Worplesdon' Cercis siliquastrum Liriodendron tulipifera Or similar approved PROPOSED BUILDING LINE Proposed Hedging Buxus sempervirens Taxus baccata Lonicera pileata Carpinus betulus Lavandulla angustifolia 'Munstead' PROPOSED TREE Escallonia 'Red Hedger' Further information see table Replace Buxus with Ilex crenata or similar approved

Proposed Shrub and Ground Cover Planting Pachysandra terminalis EXISTING TREE Euonymus ‘Dart’s Blanket’ Vinca minor Liriope muscari Bergenia cordifolia Hebe pinguifolia pagei PROPOSED SHRUB PLANTING BED Abelia x grandiflora Further information see table Hypericum ‘Hidcote’ Philadelphus ‘Belle Étoile’ Hebe ‘Mette’ Sarcococca confusa EXISTING PLANTING Viburnum davidii Miscanthus 'Klein Fontaine' Stipa tenuissima Mahonia x media ‘Charity’ Mahonia aquifolium Choisya ternata PROPOSED GRASS Supplier: Rowlawn Elaeagnus ebbingei Specification: Medallion BS3969:1998 Viburnum tinus 'Eve Price' Cotinus coggygria 'Royal Purple' Buddleja davidii 'Royal Red' Sedum 'Brilliant' & Sedum 'Herbstfreude' PROPOSED HEDGING Skimmia ssp. Further information see table Daphne odora 'Aureomarginata' Rosmarinus officinalis or similar approved HEDERA HELIX SCREEN Climbers Supplier: Hedera Screens Trachelospernum jasminoides Size: Bespoke Jasminum nudiflorum Rosa 'Zephrine Drouhin' Lonicera periclymenum 'Serotina' HOUSING BLOCK A Passiflora caerulea TARMAC/ ROAD SURFACE Clematis montana 'Elizabeth' Supplier: To Engineer Specification Garrya elliptica Specification: Vehicular Grade Tarmac or similar approved

BLOCK PAVING/ PATIO AREA Supplier: TBC Specification: Laid to a Herringbone Pattern

PROPOSED PERMEABLE BLOCK PAVING Supplier: Marshalls Specification:Tobermore Hydropave Tegula or similar approved

PATHWAYS BOWLING GREEN Supplier: TBC Specification: Resin bound surface or similar approved

HARDWOOD TREE? SEATING AREA Supplier: Woodscape Size: Bespoke Product

COMMUNAL GARDEN

revision date description dwn chkd

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard Milton Keynes MK9 2AH

T 01908 303701 W www.enplan.net COMMUNAL GARDEN HOUSING BLOCK C HOUSING BLOCK B

project scale N/A 06-941 Land to the West of the date B_30.09.2020_Title block update_DC

A_24.09.2020_Layout amendments in line with archiects updated base_DC Sep 2020 revision / date / description / drawn Range, Sonning

Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard, title drawn by Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK9 2AH DLC T 01908 303701 Illustrative Landscape W www.enplan.net

COMMUNAL GARDEN client Masterplan checked WITH PERGOLA & ARLINGTON RETIREMENT LIFESTYLES SEATING project scale RH RETIREMENT LIVING 1:250 @ A1 PROPOSALS date THE RANGE, RG4 6TQ drawing number revision title drawn DC - GENERAL ARRANGEMENT Figure 30 checked RH

drawing number revision 06-941-300 B