DOCSLIB.ORG

13Th February 2015 the University of Reading C/O Mr Paul Mcateer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
13Th February 2015 the University of Reading C/O Mr Paul Mcateer 13th February 2015 The University of Reading c/o Mr Paul McAteer Assistant Project Manager Parsons Brinckerhoff Management Services - Sustainable Building Solutions South URS Building, Whiteknights Campus The University of Reading Shinfield Road Reading RG6 6AX Dear Paul, URS Building, The University of Reading Whiteknights Campus – Ecological Appraisal and Bat Building Inspection Thank you for commissioning EPR to carry out an ecological survey to inform the proposed redevelopment of the University of Reading URS building. Redevelopment proposals currently comprise renovation works to include cosmetic alterations to the building, such as replacement of cladding. There is also potential for a further floor to be added to the structure and the existing undercroft to be enclosed, creating a useable studio space. The full extent of redevelopment plans has not yet been finalised. I therefore decided to complete an Ecological Appraisal of the URS building and its surroundings with the aim of identifying potential ecological constraints and opportunities associated with any future works to the building as fully as possible, to inform development of the proposals. The URS building lies within a complex of teaching blocks and office buildings, interspersed with amenity gardens and ornamental planting, at the centre of the University of Reading Whiteknights Campus (National Grid Reference: SU 7332 7172) (Map 1). The campus is located to the south- west of Reading City centre within a largely residential urban setting. This letter provides a summary of survey methods, results and arising recommendations following a site visit, during which an initial Ecological Appraisal and Bat Inspection of the URS building and the predicted potential Zone of Influence of redevelopment works (hereafter “the Site”) (Map 1) was conducted. At the time of this visit, a similar survey of the nearby Library building was also completed, the results of which are provided in a separate letter report. Zone of Influence In order to identify the full extent of potential ecological issues associated with future redevelopment proposals at the Site, I have considered their likely Zone of Influence (ZOI) (IEEM, 2006; refer to Appendix 1). Taking into account the type and scale of those renovation works currently proposed, I consider that the potential Zone of Influence of the scheme, for the majority of biophysical changes, is likely to extend only to the URS building itself and immediately adjacent land. This area will be the focus of any proposed renovation works. The exception to this could be where extension to/demolition within the current building footprint is proposed, as part of finalised redevelopment plans. To allow for this eventuality, during the site survey, habitats in the area surrounding the URS building were also included in the Zone of Influence and assessed for potential ecological considerations. It should, however, be noted, that any future large-scale structural redevelopment and landscaping plans may necessitate further updating habitat assessment. Relevant Guidance, Legislation and Policy Legislation and policy relevant to ecological assessment works at the URS building is set out under Appendix 1 and summarised below. In undertaking this assessment, I have had regard to best practice guidance, including that detailed within the Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) in the United Kingdom (IEEM, 2006) and the Bat Conservation Trust (BCT) Bat Surveys, Good Practice Guidelines (BCT, 2012). In preparing my recommendations, due consideration has been given to biodiversity conservation legislation, planning policy and nature conservation priorities, both national and international, including: The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Legislation providing protection for sites and species, including the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (the ‘Habitats Regulations’) and the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended); Biodiversity conservation priorities under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006, and Reading Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP). Nature conservation policy under the local planning system, namely that detailed within the existing Reading Borough Council Core Strategy (2008) (in place ahead of an emerging Local Plan document). Methodology Methods employed for completion of the Ecological Appraisal and Bat Building Inspection are set out under Appendix 2 to this document and described in further detail, where necessary, below. The Ecological Appraisal comprised of a desktop study, followed by a site visit to complete a walkover survey and Bat Inspection of the URS building and its surrounding area. I visited the site with my colleagues John Atkinson (a licensed bat ecologist: Class Licence: CLS01806) and Philip Brown on the 27th of January 2015. Desktop Study As part of the desktop study, submissions were made to the Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and local Bat Group for a records search to identify sites designated for their conservation value as well as existing European Protected Species records within 5km, and notable species records within 2km of the Site. Designated Sites The locations of designated sites identified during the search are shown on Map 1. Statutory There are no statutory designated sites located within 5km of the Site. Non-Statutory 14 non-statutory designated sites, comprising Local Wildlife Sites (LWSs) and Local Nature Reserves (LNRs) lie within 5km of the Site. The closest of these is Whiteknights Park LWS, which occupies the eastern part of the Whiteknights Campus, approximately 200m from the Site. Recommendations with regards to designated sites Due to the low-impact nature of current proposals and the isolation of the majority of designated areas from the Site, by development and urban infrastructure, I do not consider that any designated conservation interests will be affected by renovation works as they currently stand. Should future plan development lead to proposals for significant structural demolition or construction and/or landscaping works, potential impacts on the nearby LWS and any necessary mitigation measures should be considered via consultation with a suitably-qualified ecologist. Protected Species Relevant protected species records are shown on Map 3 and discussed further in the below text, as appropriate. Habitats and Botany Map 1 shows habitats recorded within the potential Zone of Influence of renovation works at the URS building during the Ecological Appraisal survey. Target notes are given as Appendix 3. The URS building is located towards the south of the Site (Target Note (TN) 1) and is considered further in the protected species section below. The building is immediately surrounded by areas of paved hard-standing and tarmacked paths. To the north is an open area of amenity grassland (TN 2). This space is intensively managed and occupied by sparse ornamental shrub planting and scattered mature and semi-mature trees, comprising both coniferous and deciduous, mostly non-native varieties. A short ornamental hedge runs along the southern and part of the eastern and western edges of this open area. In the west this hedge comprises Beech but becomes a Holly cultivar at approximately the mid-point of the building. Tarmacked paths intersect the grassed area. Ornamental borders are present in some areas alongside pathways as well as immediately adjacent to the URS building on its western and southern aspects. Species in these areas comprise non-native ornamental shrub varieties and immature trees. A similar open space is present extending from the eastern aspect of the building (TN 3). The Chancellors Way road runs alongside the western and southern aspects of the building. To the south of this feature are further smaller open amenity grassland and garden areas, beyond which lie two building blocks containing the Admissions Office (TN 4), Allen Laboratory and Human and Environmental Sciences and Archaeology departments (TN 5). A small ornamental pond is present under the undercroft overhang on the western aspect of the building (TN 6). This feature is discussed further in the protected species section below. No botanical species or habitats of conservation importance were noted during the survey. In general, the amenity spaces within and immediately surrounding the Site are not considered to support features of ecological interest and therefore I do not consider that they present any ecological constraints to renovation plans. However some mature tree specimens and shrubs in the vicinity of the building may offer potential to support breeding birds, as discussed further in the protected species section below. Recommendations with regards to habitats and botany Existing mature trees and shrubs should be retained as part of any future renovation scheme for the building and any potential impacts on these features should be minimised via the introduction of suitable root protection zones and sensitive management techniques, as appropriate. Should any future large-scale structural/landscaping redevelopment be planned for the site and/or its surroundings, the need for further updating habitat assessment should be considered via consultation with a suitably-qualified ecologist. Protected Species As part of the Ecological Appraisal, the potential for onsite habitats with the Zone of Influence to support protected species was also assessed. Results and recommendations in relation to relevant protected species considerations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Federation Autumn Event and Open Honey Show Will Be Held on Thursday 29Th September At:
    FEDERATION OF BERKSHIRE BEEKEEPERS ASSOCIATIONS August 2005 President: Miss Margery Cooper Number 590 Hon. Secretary: Hon. Editor William Napper R.F.Crocker Flat 27A School Road The Federation, its Council and its Officers cannot be held responsi- 25 Shiplake Bottom Tilehurst, Reading. ble for the views expressed in the Newsletter or possible errors. Peppard Common, Berkshire. RG31 5AR. Oxon RG9 5HH Tel: 0790 6903413 E-mail:- [email protected] (0118 972 2315) Future Events 21st – 26th August 2005 Apimondia Dublin 29th September Federation Autumn Show & Talk Dr Keith Lucas-Pollination & alpine flora st rd 21 –23 October National Honey Show The Federation Autumn Event and Open Honey Show Will be held on Thursday 29th September at: - CHARVIL VILLAGE HALL, CHARVIL Dr. Keith Lucas of Reading University Will be speaking on pollination and alpine flora Honey Judge: - Mr. Nick Grey from Buckinghamshire Put it in your diary now! Show schedules and entry forms, which include special classes for children under 14, From Hazel Blackburn Tel: 0118 9475451 1 In the Apiary - August Experiences of the June gap seem to be mixed this year. One beekeeper from Cumbria says that so far, this season is the worst that he has experienced; queen-raising over the country appears to have been erratic. In our own area some varieties of oil seed rape have yielded heavily whilst where there is no rape, honey yields have been poor or non-existent, most of June was dry and latterly hot, this did not help, hopefully rain at the end of the month will have helped. For most beekeepers in our area, at the end of July nectar secretion will have all but ceased and colonies will have been contracting.
    [Show full text]
  • Land East of Watmore Lane, Winnersh Ecological Appraisal
    Date: November 2010 Land East of Watmore Lane, Winnersh Ecological Appraisal Prepared by CSa Environmental Planning On behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd Prepared Authorised Remarks Date File Ref by by First Issue - 18/11/10 AP/CC AM 166801 Report No. CSA/1668/01 Land East of Watmore Lane, Winnersh Ecological Appraisal Contents 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Methodology 4 Desktop Biological Records Search 4 Field Survey 4 Evaluation and Assessment 4 3.0 Ecological Context 9 Designated Sites 9 Biodiversity Action Plans 10 Planning Policy Statement 9 11 4.0 Site Description and Evaluation 12 General Site Description 12 Habitats 12 Fauna 15 Evaluation of Ecological Features 18 5.0 Discussion & Recommendations 20 Potential Impacts & Recommendations 20 Ecological Enhancement 25 6.0 Summary and Conclusions 26 Appendices Appendix A Magic Database Site Check Report and Plan Appendix B Data Search Response from TVERC Appendix C Data Search Response from Berkshire Bat Group Appendix D Data Search Response from Berkshire Ornithological Society Appendix E Habitats Plan CSA/1668/100 Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd CSa Environmental Planning 2 1668_01 November 2010 Land East of Watmore Lane, Winnersh Ecological Appraisal 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This report has been prepared by CSa Environmental Planning on behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd. It sets out the findings of an Ecological Appraisal of land east of Watmore Lane, Winnersh. The survey has been commissioned to provide an initial overview of potential ecology issues to inform proposals for residential development at the site. 1.2 This ecological appraisal aims to: • Undertake a desktop search for relevant biological records and assess their significance; • Review the site in relation to its wider ecological context; • Describe and map the habitats present at the site; • Identify any potential protected or notable species issues; • Specify any detailed survey work that may be required; • Assess potential impacts; and • Recommend appropriate mitigation and biodiversity enhancement measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Management Site Specification – Wokingham to Reading
    Wessex Route CP6 Year 1 - Vegetation Management Site Specification – Wokingham to Reading 1. Site of Work Wokingham Station to Reading Station 2. Vegetation Management Overview The line of route between Wokingham and Reading is generally a heavily wooded urban area, which narrows in places and runs through a series of cuttings and embankments. Management of lineside vegetation between Wokingham and Reading has been overlooked in recent years and as a result, this route now tops Network Rail Wessex’s priority list for vegetation management. Lineside vegetation along this route is to be managed in order to prevent it causing obstruction and damage to either the rail network or to our lineside neighbours. In considering the work required, several criteria have been considered: • All lines of route must have a safe cess (walkway) for staff who are required to walk along the lineside to carry out their duties. A minimum 7 metre wide cut-back of vegetation has been specified in order to maintain a 6 metre wide vegetation-free corridor either side of the outermost rails. • Embankments supporting the railway tracks generally need vegetation to be retained at the bottom third of their slope in order to maintain stability at the toe of the embankment. In certain circumstances all vegetation is removed to allow for retaining structures to be installed. Where vegetation has the potential to cause an issue to Network Rail’s lineside neighbours it is to be removed. • There are several cutting slopes (where the railway is lower in elevation than the surrounding terrain) on the Wokingham to Reading route.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Local Wildlife Sites in Wokingham 2018.Pdf
    Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre Sharing environmental information in Berkshire and Oxfordshire Local Wildlife Sites in Wokingham, Berkshire - 2017 This list includes Local Wildlife Sites. Please contact TVERC for information on: site location and boundary area (ha) designation date last survey date site description notable and protected habitats and species recorded on site Site Code Site Name District Parish SU76B04 Highgrove Copse Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76B05 St. Leger's Copse, Collin's Copse Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76C04 Wood North of Beech Hill Wokingham BC Swallowfield Coverts/Clayhill SU76C05 Norman's Shaw Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76C07 Wood and Ditch/Moat Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76D02 Woods Between Whitehouse and Wokingham BC Shinfield Highlands SU76D04 Clare's Green Road Grasslands Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76E01 Great Lea Pond Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76G01 The Marshes, Riseley Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76H01 Cuckoo Pen Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76H02 Great Wood Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76I06 The Grove Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76J01 Shinfield Park, Nore's Hill Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76J02 Pearmans Copse Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76L02 Wheeler's Copse.Featherstone Wokingham BC Swallowfield Copse SU76M01 Farley Hill Woods, Great Copse and Wokingham BC Swallowfield New Plantation SU76M03 Long Copse (South) and Robin Wokingham BC Arborfield and Hood Copse Newland SU76M04 Wyvol's Copse Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76M06 Spring Copse and Long Copse Wokingham BC Arborfield and (North) Newland SU76N01
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildife Sites Wokingham - 2021
    LOCAL WILDIFE SITES WOKINGHAM - 2021 This list includes Local Wildlife Sites. Please contact TVERC for information on: • site location and boundary • area (ha) • designation date • last survey date • site description • notable and protected habitats and species recorded on site Site Code Site Name District Parish SU76B04 Highgrove Copse Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76B05 St. Leger's Copse, Collin's Copse Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76C04 Wood North of Beech Hill Wokingham BC Swallowfield Coverts/Clayhil SU76C05 Norman's Shaw Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76C07 Wood and Ditch/Moat Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76D02 Woods Between Whitehouse Wokingham BC Shinfield and Highlands SU76D04 Clare's Green Road Grasslands Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76E01 Great Lea Pond Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76G01 The Marshes, Riseley Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76H01 Cuckoo Pen Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76I06 The Grove Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76J01 Shinfield Park, Nore's Hill Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76J02 Pearmans Copse Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76L02 Wheeler's Copse.Featherstone Wokingham BC Swallowfield Copse SU76M01 Farley Hill Woods, Great Copse Wokingham BC Swallowfield and New Plantation SU76M03 Long Copse (South) and Robin Wokingham BC Arborfield and Hood Copse Newland SU76M04 Wyvol's Copse Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU76M06 Spring Copse and Long Copse Wokingham BC Arborfield and (North) Newland SU76N01 Moor Copse Wokingham BC Arborfield and Newland SU76N02 Pound Copse Wokingham BC Arborfield and Newland SU76N03 Rounds Copse Wokingham BC Arborfield and Newland
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Living List 2019
    LOCAL WILDIFE SITES IN WOKINGHAM - 2019 This list includes Local Widlife Sites. Please contact TVERC for information on: • site location and boundary • area (ha) • designation date • last survey date • site description • notable and protected habitats and species recorded on site Site Code Site Name District Parish SU86B02 Fishers Copse Bracknell Forest Borough Sandhurst and Council and Wok Finchampstead SU86J02 Pockets Copse Bracknell Forest Borough Binfield and Council and Wokingham BC St. Nicholas SU87F06 Swains Copse Wokingham BC and Bracknell St Nicholas Forest BC SU87C08 Grassland Opposite Blackthorn Farm Wokingham BC and Windsor Ruscombe and Maidenhead SU86J01 Big Wood Bracknell Forest Borough Binfield and Council and Wokingham BC Wokingham SU87D05 Windsor Ait Windsor and Maidenhead & Waltham St Lawrence Wokingham BC SU87E02 Bear Grove Lindenhill Wood Wokingham BC SU76U03 Bearwood Estate - Woods and Lakes Wokingham BC Arborfield and Newland SU78R02 Branfords Woodlands Wokingham BC Remenham SU76Y06 Brook Farm Meadow Wokingham BC Barkham SU78W05 Cannon Wood Wokingham BC Remenham SU78R03 Chalk Grassland Remenham Wokingham BC SU76D04 Clare’s Green Road Grasslands Wokingham BC Shinfield SU76R04 Claypits Copse Wokingham BC Finchampstead SU76H01 Cuckoo Pen Wokingham BC Swallowfield SU87E04 Cuttler’s Coppice Wokingham BC Wargrave SU76W06 East Court Woods Wokingham BC Finchampstead SU78V06 Fairman’s Wood/Little Fairman’s Wokingham BC Wargrave Wood SU86B01 Finchamstead Ridges Wokingham BC Finchampstead SU76W01 Fleet Copse Wokingham BC Finchampstead
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report by the Director of Environment and Neighbourhood Services Reading Borough Council Item No
    COMMITTEE REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SERVICES READING BOROUGH COUNCIL ITEM NO. 14 PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE: 11th January 2017 Ward: Out of Borough App No.:162174 ADJ (South Oxfordshire ref P16/S3630/O) Address: Land at Peppard Road, Caversham, Proposal: Residential development of up to 245 residential dwellings (including up to 40% affordable housing), structural planting and landscaping, informal public open space and children’s play areas, vehicular access from Peppard Road and Kiln Road and associated ancillary works. All matters reserved with the exception of the main vehicular access Applicant: Gladman Development Ltd Date received: 2/11/2016 (by South Oxfordshire District Council) Major Application: South Oxfordshire District Council 13 week target decision date: 1/02/2017 RECOMMENDATION: 1. That South Oxfordshire District Council be informed that Reading Borough Council OBJECTS to the application on the following grounds: a) The proposal would have a significant impact on the surrounding infrastructure in Reading Borough including highways, education, open space/leisure facilities (encompassing the use of Clayfield Copse and Blackhouse Wood) and the provision of affordable housing. No clear plan or mechanism to secure appropriate mitigation to these impacts has been secured without which the scheme is considered unsustainable and contrary to para 203 of the National Planning Policy Framework. b) The proposed development would result in the increased use of substandard road junctions, which would have an adverse effect on road safety and the flow of traffic. c) The proposed development is unlikely to function or operate in a sustainable manner, taking account of the site’s relatively remote location, which is poorly served by public transport links and pedestrian/cycle routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist #71 (2019)
    The Reading Naturalist No. 71 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society Report for 2018 (Published 2019) Price to Non-Members £5.00 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 71 for the year 2018 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mr David Cliffe Honorary General Secretary Mr Rob Stallard Honorary Editor Mr Ken White , Yonder Cottage, Ashford Hill, Reading, RG19 8AX Honorary Recorders Botany: Dr Ren ée Grayer , 16 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Fungi: Position Vacant Lichens: Position Vacant Lepidoptera: Mr Norman Hal l, 44 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Entomology & other Invertebrates: Position Vacant Vertebrates: Mr Tony Rayner , The Red Cow, 46 Wallingford Road, Cholsey, Wallingford, OX10 9LB CONTENTS page Presidential Musings David Cliffe 1 Membership Norman Hall, Ian Duddle 2 Members’ Observations Julia Cooper, Rob Stallard 2 Excursions 2018 Jan Haseler, Norman Hall, 6 Sean O’Leary, Jerry Welsh Tricia Marcous é, Sarah White, Ken White Mid-week Walks 2018 Jan Haseler, Julia Cooper 18 Sue White Away Trips 2018 Jan Haseler 23 Indoor Meetings 2018 Renée Grayer, Rob Stallard 26 Susan Twitchett, Tricia Marcous é Winning photographs and photographs from outings RDNHS Members 33-36 Christmas Party and Photographic Competition Laurie Haseler 39 Presidential Address David Cliffe 41 Autumn Raptors in Andalucia Fiona Brown 45 A Sunflower Tale Sarah White 47 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2018 Renée Grayer 47 Recorder’s Report for Lepidoptera 2018 Norman Hall 52 Recorder’s Report for Vertebrates 2018 Tony Rayner 64 The Weather in Reading during 2018 Roger Brugge 68 Slugs in the Kitchen Rob Stallard 72 RDNHS Winter Goose and Swan Review Ken White 72 My special thanks to all the contributors for their thousands of hours of effort in the field, collating data & meeting the deadlines for reports whilst carrying on with their busy lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Register
    1 BSBI RARE PLANT REGISTER Berkshire & South Oxfordshire V.C. 22 MICHAEL J. CRAWLEY FRS UPDATED APRIL 2005 2 Symbols and conventions The Latin binomial (from Stace, 1997) appears on the left of the first line in bold, followed by the authority in Roman font and the English Name in italics. Names on subsequent lines in Roman font are synonyms (including names that appear in Druce’s (1897) or Bowen’s (1964) Flora of Berkshire that are different from the name of the same species in Stace). At the right hand side of the first line is a set of symbols showing - status (if non-native) - growth form - flowering time - trend in abundance (if any) The status is one of three categories: if the plant arrived in Britain after the last ice age without the direct help of humans it is defined as a native, and there is no symbol in this position. If the archaeological or documentary evidence indicates that a plant was brought to Berkshire intentionally of unintentionally by people, then that species is an alien. The alien species are in two categories ● neophytes ○ archaeophytes Neophytes are aliens that were introduced by people in recent times (post-1500 by convention) and for which we typically have precise dates for their first British and first Berkshire records. Neophytes may be naturalized (forming self-replacing populations) or casual (relying on repeated introduction). Archaeophytes are naturalized aliens that were carried about by people in pre-historic times, either intentionally for their utility, or unintentionally as contaminants of crop seeds. Archaeophytes were typically classified as natives in older floras.
    [Show full text]
  • PRE-SUBMISSION DRAFT READING BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012
    PRE-SUBMISSION DRAFT READING BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 November 2017 DRAFT READING BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN ● APRIL 2017 FOREWORD FOREWORD By Councillor Tony Page The Local Plan will be the document that guides development in Reading up to 2036, and it will therefore play a decisive role in how our town evolves over the next two decades. We are publishing this draft of the plan for consultation, and it is important to have your views on it, so that they can be taken into account in finalising the plan. Over recent years, Reading has had considerable economic success, and this has resulted in considerable investment to the town. However, this success brings its own issues. In particular, Reading faces a housing crisis. There are not enough homes in general, and there is a particularly acute need for affordable housing, which represents more than half of our overall housing need. This document is a major part of our response to this issue, although we continue to work with neighbouring Councils to look at the needs of the Reading area as a whole. Other critical issues to be considered include how to provide the employment space and supporting infrastructure to make sure that Reading’s attractiveness as a place to work, to live and to study can continue. The benefits of Reading’s economic success also need to be shared out more equally with those communities in Reading that suffer high levels of deprivation and exclusion. The plan also looks again at the message that Reading’s environment sends to visitors and residents, both in terms of revitalising tired and run-down sites and areas, and in placing greater focus on our considerable, but often overlooked, historic legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Report
    LAND SOUTH OF OLD BATH ROAD, SONNING, WOKINGHAM PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE REPORT on behalf of Arlington Retirement Lifestyles October 2020 Enplan, Gloucester House, 399 Silbury Boulevard, Milton Keynes MK9 2AH Offices also at Tunbridge Wells Directors: PG Russell-Vick DipLA CMLI • MA Carpenter BA(Hons) MRTPI • RJ Hodgetts BA(Hons) DipLA CMLI 01908 303701 [email protected] www.enplan.net Enplan is the trading name of Enplan UK Limited. Registered in England & Wales with Company Number 4608553. A list of directors is available at the registered office; Preston Park House, South Road, Brighton, BN1 6SB. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 | Enplan ref 06-941 Land to the west of The Range Landscape Report September 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 2.0 LANDSCAPE RELATED PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT .................................. 7 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, February 2019): ............................. 7 Core Strategy (2010)............................................................................................. 8 Managing Development’ Delivery Local Plan (2014) ............................................ 9 Wokingham Local Plan ....................................................................................... 11 3.0 LANDSCAPE CONTEXT .................................................................................... 13 Landscape Character .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GAZELLE CLOSE, WINNERSH Ecologocal Impact Assessment (Ecia)
    GAZELLE CLOSE, WINNERSH Ecologocal Impact Assessment (EcIA) for Roy Wood Transits Ltd April 2017 01 April 2017 © The Landmark Practice 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of The Landmark Practice. The Landmark Practice is a division of Landmark Environmental Consultants Ltd (Limited Company No 1939302). Landmark Ref: 2955 Client: Roy Wood Transits Ltd This document was produced under Landmark contract for Roy Wood Transits Ltd. Version Prepared by Checked by Approved by Issued D01 AP/MCIEEM RP/MCIEEM BR/MCIEEM AP/MCIEEM 20/03/2017 21/03/2017 22/03/2017 24/03/2017 FV AP/MCIEEM 21/04/2017 *D denotes a Draft version The information which we have prepared and provided is true, and has been prepared and provided in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. We confirm that the opinions expressed are our true and professional bona fide opinions. Tel: 0117 923 0455 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) has been prepared to assess the potential impacts of a proposed camper van showroom and car parking development at Gazelle Close, Winnersh by Roy Wood Transits Ltd. The report describes the ecological survey work undertaken to inform the application scheme, considers the impacts of the proposed development on the ecology of the site and its environs and describes the strategy devised to inform suitable mitigation and/or compensation measures required to address these impacts.
    [Show full text]