DOCSLIB.ORG

Iffo Rs V2.0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iffo Rs V2.0 IFFO RS V2.0 FISHERY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TEMPLATE REPORT Fishery Under Assessment Ecuador Small Pelagic Date August 2018 Assessor Sam Peacock IFFO RS Ltd, Unit C, Printworks, 22 Amelia Street, London, SE17 3BZ, United Kingdom Application details and summary of the assessment outcome Name: Address: Country: Zip: Tel. No. Fax. No. Email address: Applicant Code Key Contact: Title: Assessment Details Name of Assessment Body: RS Standards Assessor Name Peer Reviewer Assessment Initial/Surveillance/ Whole fish / By- Days Re-approval product Sam Peacock Improver Programme Whole fish Assessment Period March – April 2018 Scope Details Management Authority (Country/State) Ecuador Pacific chub mackerel Frigate tuna Shortfin scad Corbata Main Species Thread herrings Pacific anchoveta (chuhueco) Cornetfish Round herring Roncador Fishery Location Ecuador EEZ Gear Type(s) Purse seine Outcome of Assessment Clauses where improvements or further information M1, M2, A, F1, F3 are required 1 IFFO RS Fishery Assessment Methodology & Template Report Jan 2017 General Results General Clause Outcome (Pass/Gap) M1 - Management Framework PASS M2 - Surveillance, Control and Enforcement PASS F1 - Impacts on ETP Species GAP F2 - Impacts on Habitats PASS F3 - Ecosystem Impacts GAP Note: This table should be completed for whole fish assessments only. Species-Specific Results Category Species % landings Outcome (Pass/Gap) A1 GAP A2 GAP Pacific chub mackerel 31.4% A3 GAP A4 GAP Frigate tuna 18.4% Shortfin scad 12.6% Category A Corbata 10.8% Thread herrings 8.6% GAP – see notes Pacific anchoveta (chuhueco) 6.5% Cornetfish 2.8% Round herring 2.7% Roncador 1% Category B Optional – see section B Category C Jack mackerel 0.3% PASS Longnose anchovy 0.7% PASS Category D Pacific harvestfish 0.5% PASS Drums 0.4% PASS 2 IFFO RS Fishery Assessment Methodology & Template Report Jan 2017 HOW TO COMPLETE THIS ASSESSMENT REPORT This assessment template uses a modular approach to assessing fisheries against the IFFO RS standard. Whole Fish The process for completing the template for a whole fish assessment is as follows: 1. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete the Species Characterisation table, to determine which categories of species are present in the fishery. 2. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete clauses M1, M2, M3: Management. 3. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY A SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete clauses A1, A2, A3, A4 for each Category A species. 4. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY B SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete the Section B risk assessment for each Category B species. 5. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY C SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete clause C1 for each Category C species. 6. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY D SPECIES IN THE FISHERY: Complete Section D. 7. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete clauses F1, F2, F3: Further Impacts. A fishery must score a pass in all applicable clauses before approval may be recommended. To achieve a pass in a clause, the fishery/species must meet all of the minimum requirements. By-products The process for completing the template for by-product raw material is as follows: 1. ALL ASSESSMENTS: Complete the Species Characterisation table with the names of the by- product species and stocks under assessment. The ‘% landings’ column can be left empty; all by-products are considered as Category C and D. 2. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY C BYPRODUCTS UNDER ASSESSMENT: Complete clause C1 for each Category C by-product. 3. IF THERE ARE CATEGORY D BYPRODUCTS UNDER ASSESSMENT: Complete Section D. 4. ALL OTHER SECTIONS CAN BE DELETED. Clauses M1 - M3, F1 - F3, and Sections A and B do not need to be completed for a by-product assessment. By-product approval is awarded on a species-by-species basis. Each by-product species scoring a pass under the appropriate section may be approved against the IFFO RS Standard. 3 IFFO RS Fishery Assessment Methodology & Template Report Jan 2017 SPECIES CATEGORISATION The following table should be completed as fully as the available information permits. Any species representing more than 0.1% of the annual catch should be listed, along with an estimate of the proportion of the catch each species represents. The species should then be divided into Type 1 and Type 2 as follows: Type 1 Species can be considered the ‘target’ or ‘main’ species in the fishery. They make up the bulk of annual landings and are subjected to a detailed assessment. Type 2 Species can be considered the ‘bycatch’ or ‘minor’ species in the fishery. They make up a small proportion of the annual landings and are subjected to relatively high-level assessment. Type 1 Species must represent 95% of the total annual catch. Type 2 Species may represent a maximum of 5% of the annual catch (see Appendix B). Species which make up less than 0.1% of landings do not need to be listed (NOTE: ETP species are considered separately). The table should be extended if more space is needed. Discarded species should be included when known. The ‘stock’ column should be used to differentiate when there are multiple biological or management stocks of one species captured by the fishery. The ‘management’ column should be used to indicate whether there is an adequate management regime specifically aimed at the individual species/stock. In some cases it will be immediately clear whether there is a species-specific management regime in place (for example, if there is an annual TAC). In less clear circumstances, the rule of thumb should be that if the species meets the minimum requirements of clauses A1-A4, an adequate species-specific management regime is in place. NOTE: If any species is categorised as Endangered or Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, or if it appears in the CITES appendices, it cannot be approved for use as an IFFO RS raw material. This applied to whole fish as well as by-products. 4 IFFO RS Fishery Assessment Methodology & Template Report Jan 2017 TYPE 1 SPECIES (Representing 95% of the catch or more) Category A: Species-specific management regime in place. Category B: No species-specific management regime in place. TYPE 2 SPECIES (Representing 5% OF THE CATCH OR LESS) Category C: Species-specific management regime in place. Category D: No species-specific management regime in place. Common name Latin name Stock % of landings Management Category Pacific chub Scomber japonicus 31.4% Some A or B mackerel Frigate tuna Auxis brachydorax 18.4% A or B Decapterus Shortfin scad 12.6% A or B macrosoma Corbata Trichuuris lepturus 10.8% A or B Thread herrings Opisthonema spp 8.6% A or B Pacific Cetengraulis anchoveta 6.5% A or B mysticetus (chuhueco) Cornetfish Fistularia spp 2.8% A or B Etrumeus Round herring 2.7% A or B acuminatus Maemulopsis Roncador 1% A or B axillaris Longnose Anchoa nasus 0.7% No D anchovy Pacific Peprilus medius 0.5% No D harvestfish Drums Larimus spp 0.4% No D Jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi 0.3% Yes C Categorisation Note: Percentage of landings is calculated as an estimate of the average prevalence in the catch 2012 – 2016. Catch composition shifted substantially in 2012 due to a change in gear regulations. As the new gear regulation is expected to remain in place, the new catch composition is considered the most relevant. See Improver Programme Note 1 for more details. Improver Programme Note 1: The IFFO RS fishery assessment process begins with the categorisation of species caught in the fishery using the methodology described above. Full landings data were provided by the applicant breaking the catch down by species or genus for the period 2004 – 2016. However, it was also reported by the applicant that in 2012 a new regulation came into force which increased the minimum mesh size for Ecuadorian purse seiners, resulting in a substantial change in the catch composition in the fishery. For this reason, the categorisation of landings for the purposes of this assessment has used an average of 5 IFFO RS Fishery Assessment Methodology & Template Report Jan 2017 the landings between 2012 and 2016. There is considerable variation between years and so it is likely that the IFFO RS species list will change over time. Improver Programme Note 2: This assessment uses the IFFO RS methodology to determine which species are subjected to assessment. There are several other species which have historically seen some small landings in the fishery, but have not been present in significant numbers in recent years. If these species begin to re-appear in the catch, it is possible that they will exceed the 0.1% minimum proportion which will require them to be included in the assessment. 6 IFFO RS Fishery Assessment Methodology & Template Report Jan 2017 Background Section 1.1 Overview of the fishery The Ecuadorian small pelagic fishery is economically and socially important for the country. Industrial fishing began in the 1950s, but only began to grow into a substantial activity in the 1970s. Total reported landings reached a peak of nearly 1 million tonnes in the mid-1980s, but in recent years have generally fluctuated between 200,000-300,000t. Catch is heavily influenced by oceanographic and environmental variables, both in terms of total volume but also catch composition. There is extensive evidence to indicate that there is high natural variability in the relative sizes of the stocks targeted by the fishery, and therefore their relative prevalence in landings. Natural variability also affects whether certain species occur in the catch at all. De la Cuadra (2010) point out that in front of the Equator, the small pelagic fish species landed by the industrial fleet are strongly influenced by the short-term thermal changes that occur in the ocean, such as the warm and cold phase of the ENSO cycle (El Niño / Southern Oscillation).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recipes for Your Sustainable Seafood
    Recipes for your sustainable seafood Not sure how to cook what’s on offer at your local fish merchant? Here we recommend the fish that are sustainable to buy and suggest some recipes to try with them. Brown crab Cancer pagurus Brown crab, also known as edible crab, is the heaviest British crab. About a third of the weight of the crab is meat, two thirds is white and third is brown. It's used to make 'dressed crab' where the shell is cleaned out and used as the dish. Crab is also used to make fish cakes, crab sticks and paste. Brown crabs mature at about 10 years and averagely lives for 30 years, but some have been known to go on till they're 100! The vast majority of brown crabs in the UK are caught by potting. This is a low impact and relatively selective method of fishing, any bycatch or discards can be returned alive to the sea with high survival rates. Brown crab from the Inshore Potting Agreement Area in Devon, the Western Channel or Cornwall are the best choices for crab in the UK. Avoid eating crabs below the minimum landing size (13-14 cm in most areas of the UK) and crab claws, unless it is certain they have been removed from the animal after landing. Egg-bearing or "berried" females should be avoided at all times to allow them to spawn. (Information source: MSC Good Fish Guide) Brown crab Recipes - These four recipes from The Guardian include jungle curry with crab and a spring salad.
    [Show full text]
  • D13 the Marine Environment Development Consent Order
    ENERGY WORKING FOR BRITAIN FOR WORKING ENERGY Wylfa Newydd Project 6.4.13 ES Volume D - WNDA Development D13 - The marine environment PINS Reference Number: EN010007 Application Reference Number: 6.4.13 June 2018 Revision 1.0 Regulation Number: 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Horizon Internal DCRM Number: WN0902-JAC-PAC-CHT-00045 [This page is intentionally blank] Contents 13 The marine environment .................................................................................. 1 13.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 13.2 Study area ....................................................................................................... 1 13.3 Wylfa Newydd Development Area baseline environment ................................ 2 Conservation designations .............................................................................. 3 Water quality .................................................................................................... 9 Sediment quality ............................................................................................ 13 Phytoplankton and zooplankton ..................................................................... 15 Marine benthic habitats and species .............................................................. 18 Marine fish ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Landing Obligation and Its Implications on the Control of Fisheries
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES THE LANDING OBLIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE CONTROL OF FISHERIES STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries. AUTHORS Ocean Governance Consulting: Christopher Hedley Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science: Tom Catchpole, Ana Ribeiro Santos RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Marcus Breuer Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Adrienn Borka Lyna Pärt LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in September 2015. © European Union, 2015. Print ISBN 978-92-823-7938-7 doi:10.2861/694624 QA-02-15-709-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-823-7939-4 doi:10.2861/303902 QA-02-15-709-EN-N This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES THE LANDING OBLIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE CONTROL OF FISHERIES STUDY Abstract This study reviews the impacts of the new Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) rules requiring catches in regulated fisheries to be landed and counted against quotas of each Member State ("the landing obligation and requiring that catch of species subject to the landing obligation below a minimum conservation reference size be restricted to purposes other than direct human consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: [email protected]) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Canales Et Al 2015
    Fisheries Research 161 (2015) 261–268 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres Changes in the size-structure of a multispecies pelagic fishery off Northern Chile a,∗ b c,d e T. Mariella Canales , Richard Law , Rodrigo Wiff , Julia L. Blanchard a Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Departamento de Evaluación de Recursos, Blanco 839, Valparaíso, Chile b The University of York, York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis, Ron Cooke Hub, York YO10 5EG, UK c Copas Sur-Austral, Universidad de Concepción, Departamento de Oceanografía, Barrio Universitario s/n, Chile d Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Alameda 340, Santiago, Chile e The University of Sheffield, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Size-based indicators are important tools for understanding how environmental variability and fishing Received 13 February 2014 impact on marine populations and communities. Ideally, they would standardise fishery-independent Received in revised form 8 August 2014 survey data. However, this is not possible in many of the world’s ecosystems with important commercial Accepted 9 August 2014 fisheries. Using fishery-dependent data we investigated changes in the size–structure of pelagic catches off Northern Chile and whether or not these changes are influenced by the environment. We computed Keywords: single- and multispecies, size-based fishery indicators (SBFIs) from 1990 to 2008 for the main commercial Body size species, anchovy (Engraulis ringens), sardine (Sardinops sagax), jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) and Fishery Multispecies mackerel (Scomber japonicus).
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch® Standard for Fisheries
    1 Seafood Watch® Standard for Fisheries Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Seafood Watch Guiding Principles ...................................................................................................... 3 Seafood Watch Criteria and Scoring Methodology for Fisheries ........................................................... 5 Criterion 1 – Impacts on the Species Under Assessment ...................................................................... 8 Factor 1.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................... 9 Factor 1.2 Fishing Mortality ......................................................................................................... 19 Criterion 2 – Impacts on Other Capture Species ................................................................................ 22 Factor 2.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................. 26 Factor 2.2 Fishing Mortality ......................................................................................................... 27 Factor 2.3 Modifying Factor: Discards and Bait Use .................................................................... 29 Criterion
    [Show full text]
  • 5.2 Barents Sea Ecoregion – Fisheries Overview
    ICES Fisheries Overviews Barents Sea Ecoregion Published 29 November 2019 5.2 Barents Sea Ecoregion – Fisheries overview Table of contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Who is fishing ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Catches over time ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Description of the fisheries........................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Fisheries management ............................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Status of the fishery resources ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MSC Sustainable Fisheries Certification
    FOOD CERTIFICATION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Findhorn House, Dochfour Business Centre, Dochgarroch, Inverness, IV3 8GY, Scotland, UK Tel: 00 44 (0) 1463 223 039 Fax: 00 44 (0) 1463 246 380 www.foodcertint.com MSC Sustainable Fisheries Certification Public Comment Draft Report for the Irish Pelagic Sustainability Group (IPSG) Western mackerel ( Scomber scombrus ) pelagic trawl fishery JUNE 2009 prepared for: Irish Pelagic Sustainability Group (IPSG) by: Food Certification International Ltd A company incorporated in Scotland No SC313289. Registered address as above IPSG Western mackerel pelagic trawl fishery June 2009 Authors: T. Southall, P. Medley, N. Pfeiffer, M. Gill, M. McFadden Certification Body: Client Contact: Food Certification International Ltd Irish Pelagic Sustainability Group Findhorn House Bruach na Mara Dochfour Business Centre St Catherine’s Road Dochgarroch Killybegs Inverness Co. Donegal Scotland Eire IV3 8GY UK T: +44(0) 1463 223 039 T: +353 74 973 1089 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] W: www.foodcertint.com W: www.kfo.ie Food Certification International Public Comment Draft Report IPSG Western mackerel pelagic trawl fishery Contents 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Scope. .............................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Report structure...............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Regulations . (L. 1. 1968) L.I
    REp\' sue OF m lA',A FISHERIES REGULATIONS . (L. 1. 1968) L.I. 1968 FISHERIES REGULATIONS, 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS Regulation Fishery plans and fishing vessels 1. Fishery plans 2. Application for registration, licensing of local, industrial and semi- industrial fishing vessels 3. Licensing and identification of fishing vessels 4. Unauthorised use of registration number and identity 5. Markings on fishing vessel Fishing nets, fishing devices and fishing 6. Use of seine net in inland waters 7. Obstruction of water ways by use of set fishing gears 8. Use of set nets 9. Beach seine not to be used in marine protected areas 10. Manufacture, importation, sale and use of unauthorised fishing nets or other gears 11. Prohibited fishing methods 12. Minimum mesh sizes of fishing gears 13. Mesh size definition 14. Minimum landing size of commercially important species 15. Obstruction of mesh and use of chafers 16. Use of turtle excluder device i 7. Marine and freshwater mammals Fishing equipment 18. Lights and shapes to be exhibited by fishing vessels 19. Equipment to be carried by motorised and non-motorised fishing vessels 20. Light and equipment to be carried by small vessels 21. Fish aggregating devices 22. Research Fishing licence 23. Application for renewal of fishing Licence 24. Fishing in foreign waters 25. Markers on fishing gears L.I.1968 2 FISHERIES REGULATIONS, 2010 26. English Language as a medium of communication 27. Application for a licence to operate a canoe 28. Transfer of canoe licence 29. Brush-park fishing or "atidza" "(acadja)" 30. Trial fishing 31. Incidental catches 32.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Discards Using Selectivity Data: the Effects of Mesh Size Changes in the Mixed Demersal Fisheries in the Irish Sea
    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHOR(S) Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N2302 NAFO SCR Doc. 93/109 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 1993 'Estimating Discards Using Selectivity Data: the Effects of Mesh Size Changes in the Mixed Demersal Fisheries in the Irish Sea. by J. Casey Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Directorate of Fisheries Research Fisheries Laboratory Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, U.K. Abstract A model is described to predict the numbers at age of fish discarded in fisheries for which only landings at age are known. The model assumes a knowledge of the E distributionoflengthwiftneachagegroupindiepoputhfion,andusesmeshselection 0 characteristics, and an inferred discarding practice, to derive the proportions of each 0 age group discarded and landed. Mesh selectivity and discarding practice, in terms of 0 proportions of the catch discarded and landed, are described using a logistic fit to the proportions of the population entering the net that are caught, discarded and landed. The application of the model is illustrated using data from the mixed demersal fisheries 11 .1 in the Irish Sea, and the effects of mesh size and effort changes on catch predictions are examined. 71-5 t9 Introduction Catches of finfish in the Irish Sea are dominated by four main species; the common sole (Solea solea (Linnaeus, 1758)), plaice (Pleuronectesplatessa Linnaeus, 1758), cod (Gadus morhua Linnaeus, 1758) and whiting (Merlangias merlangus (Linnaeus, 1758)). The demersal fishery for these species in the Irish Sea is prosecuted by 3 main fleets, each using a different gear type; beam trawlers, otter trawlers and Nephrops trawlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT of the WORKING GROUP on STOCK ASSESSMENT of DEMERSAL SPECIES Split, Croatia 5-9 November 2012
    GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN COMMISSION GÉNÉRALE DES PÊCHES POUR LA MÉDITERRANÉE GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SAC) Fifteen Session Cairo, Egypt 20-24 February 2013 REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENT OF DEMERSAL SPECIES Split, Croatia 5-9 November 2012 OPENING SESSION (joint session for the two Working Groups on Demersal and Small Pelagic Species) 1. The meetings of the SCSA Working Groups on Demersal and Small Pelagic Species (WGs) were held in Split, Croatia from 5 to 9 November 2012. Organized by the Croatian Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries and hosted at the Hotel Best Western Art. The two meetings were held in parallel in two different meeting rooms, except for the opening session that was addressed to the two groups together. 2. Ms Pilar Hernández, from GFCM Secretariat, welcome the participants and thanked them for attending and providing contributions to this meeting, as well as the Croatian authorities and the Institute for their kindness in hosting and arranging the meeting. 3. She informed of several changes in the functioning promoted by the Secretariat according to recommendations of last years by the WGs and the SAC. Those changes are the new format of the Stock assessment forms, the creation of an online platform for the exchange of information based on SharePoint and the nomination of the moderator or chairman within the WGs, elected among their participants. She then underlined that these changes had been promoted for the sake of improving the overall process of stock assessment which is the pillar for the subsequent management actions and that must be based on the best possible science and on the most reliable data.
    [Show full text]